Upload
vungoc
View
219
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ANNUAL REPORT 2007UIUC, June 12, 2007
Bret Rietow (MS Student) &Brian G. Thomas
Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Flow in a Funnel Mold
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 2
Objectives
– Model fluid flow in a funnel mold caster– Compare steel flow with water models– Investigate the effect of casting speed
Dimensions:Narrow Face: 90 mmWide Face: 1450 mmMold Length: 1200 mmMax. Funnel Width: 170 mmSEN Submergence: 265 mm
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 3
Nozzle 2: Geometry and Operating Conditions
Casting Speed = 3.6 m/min(slab size = 90x1450 mm)
Inlet velocity (F.S.) = 1.56 m/sSteel density = 7000 Kg / m3Steel viscosity = 0.006Kg/m.s
All Dimensions are in mm
Front View Side View
D80
1165
392
143
155 28
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 4
Velocity in nozzle
Front View Side View
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 5
Port outlet velocity
Side ViewFront View
Back Flow
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 6
Jet Characteristics
<4%Back Flow Zone Percentage
1.62Port-to-bore Ratio
79.4Vertical Jet Angle (degrees)
1.14Jet Speed (m/s)
3.6Casting Speed (m/min)
Good uniform spread of flow leaving ports despite a large port to bore ratio.
Steep downward jet, resulting in a slower flow on the top fluid surface.
A high casting speed can be run with this nozzle without EMBR.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 7
Model Formulation: including steel shell
• CON1D used to predict shell thickness
• Mass and momentum “sinks” used at fluid boundaries to simulate solidification– Sinks are a function of shell curvature
• Standard k-epsilon turbulence model
• FLUENT solves N.S. equations for steady, single phase flow
θ
Vcasting
Vn
ρsolid
ρliquid
A1
A2
A3
C.V (Volume=V)
x
z
Vt
izc
zc
VVC
vVnkMomentumSi
VC
vVMassSink
*..
**..
**
ρ
ρ
−=
−=
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 8
Model Validation
• Comparison to previous work performed by QuanYuan on a parallel mold thin-slab caster
984mm 132mmFree-Slip Bounary
Casting Speed:25.4mm/s
zy
x
Shell Boundaries
Jet
2400mm
934mm 80mm
Pressure B.C. at Bottom
Liquid-pool
7.98 × 10-7Fluid Kinematic Viscosity (m2/s)
25.4Casting Speed (mm/s)
127SEN Submergence Depth (mm)
32Bottom nozzle Port Diameter (mm)
75 × 32 (inner bore)
Nozzle Port Height × Thickness (mm × mm)
2400Domain Length (mm)
132 (top)79.48 (domain bottom)
Domain Thickness (mm)
984 (top)934.04 (domain bottom)
Domain Width (mm)
1200Mold Length (mm)
132Mold Thickness (mm)
984Mold Width (mm)
Case 2-SParameter/Property
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 9
Model Validation (top surface velocity)
-0.09
-0.04
0.01
0.06
0.11
0.16
0.21
0.26
-0.08 0.02 0.12 0.22 0.32 0.42
Distance from Center [m]
Ho
rizo
nta
l Ve
loc
ity
to
wa
rds
SE
N [
m/s
]
• Horizontal Velocity at Top Surface WF Centerline
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 10
Model Validation (cont.)
-0.27
-0.22
-0.17
-0.12
-0.07
-0.02
0.03
0.08
0.13
0.18
0.23
0.28
0.33
0.38
0.43
0.48
-0.64 -0.54 -0.44 -0.34 -0.24 -0.14 -0.04 0.06 0.16 0.26 0.36 0.46 0.56
Distance from Center [m]
Do
wn
wa
rd V
elo
cit
y, V
z [m
/s]
• Downward Velocity along WF Centerline, 0.5m from top surface
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 11
Funnel Mold Design
Funnel Taper through Mold(not to scale; all units in mm)
900
300
Mold Top40
8
Steel
Mold
10893.19090
160240325
Mold Top
900 mm below Top to Mold Bottom Surface
170148.39090
Mold Thickness (all units in mm)
Nozzle
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 12
Funnel Mold Model
170Mold Thickness in top funnel region (mm)
8.57 × 10-7Fluid Kinematic Viscosity (m2/s)
3.6Casting Speed (m/min)
265SEN Submergence Depth (mm)
201.53 × 28Nozzle 2: Port Effective Height ×Thickness (mm × mm)
2500Domain Length (mm)
90 (top)50.84 (domain bottom)
Domain Thickness (mm)
1450 (top)1414 (domain bottom)
Domain Width (mm)
1200Mold Length (mm)
90Mold Thickness at narrow face (mm)
1450Mold Width (mm)
3.6 m/minCasting Speed
Y
Z
0
-3.2
-3
-2.8
-2.6
-2.4
-2.2
-2
-1.8
-1.6
-1.4
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2 Solidifying steel shell greatly affects shape of liquid pool
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 13
Flow Pattern details
Centerline
3.6m/min steel caster
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 14
Surface velocity details
Uniform flow towards SEN (idealized symmetric steady flow pattern)
Rounded SEN allows smooth streamlined flow and penetration into gap between SEN and WF
Funnel effect is small (flow behavior similar to parallel mold)
3.6m/min steel caster
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 15
Flow Pattern details
Velicity vectors and streamlines in WF Centerline
3.6m/min steel caster
X
Z
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0
-3.2
-3
-2.8
-2.6
-2.4
-2.2
-2
-1.8
-1.6
-1.4
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
1 m/s
X
Z
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0
-1.4
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
Note: Lower recirculation zone extends deep into caster
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 16
X
Z
-0.6
-0.6
-0.4
-0.4
-0.2
-0.2
0
0
-1.4
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
X
Z
-0.6
-0.6
-0.4
-0.4
-0.2
-0.2
0
0
-1.4 -
-1.2 -
-1 -
-0.8 -
-0.6 -
-0.4 -
-0.2 -
0
0.2
X
Z
-0.6
-0.6
-0.4
-0.4
-0.2
-0.2
0
0
-1.4 -
-1.2 -
-1 -
-0.8 -
-0.6 -
-0.4 -
-0.2 -
0 0
0.2 0
X
Z
-0.6
-0.6
-0.4
-0.4
-0.2
-0.2
0
0
-1.4
-1.2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
Overall Flow Pattern (CL comparison)
Qualitatively similar flow patterns (water model has lower NF impingement)
3.6 m/min 4.8 m/min3.6m/min Water model 4.2m/min
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 17
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
-0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0
Distance from Centerline, X [m]
Ve
loc
ity
Ma
gn
itu
de
, U
mag
[m
/s]
3.6 Water
3.6 Steel
4.2 Steel
4.8 Steel
SEN
Shell Front
Narrowface
Centerline
Surface velocity(towards SEN, across width near top surface)
Water model produces much lower surface speeds
Liquid slag on Top Surface
3.6 m/min
4.8 m/min
Increasing casting speed linearly increases surface velocity
3.6 m/min Water model
10 mm
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 18
Downward velocity(down centerline near NF)
Water model produces excessive speeds low in caster
-3.5
-3.25
-3
-2.75
-2.5
-2.25
-2
-1.75
-1.5
-1.25
-1
-0.75
-0.5
-0.25
0
0.25
0.5
-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Downward Velocity, Uz [m/s]
Do
ma
in H
eig
ht,
Z [
m]
3.6 Water
3.6 Steel
4.2 Steel
4.8 Steel
Liquid Steel Top Surface
0.6 m
3.6 m/min
4.8 m/min
Increasing casting speed increases velocity more towards end of lower recirculation region
3.6 m/min Water model
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 19
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
-0.05 -0.045 -0.04 -0.035 -0.03 -0.025 -0.02 -0.015 -0.01 -0.005 0
Distance from Centerline, X [m]
Do
wn
war
ds
Vel
oci
ty,
Uz [
m/s
]
3.6 Water
3.6 Steel
4.2 Steel
4.8 Steel
Shell Front Centerline
Wideface
Downward velocity(through thickness 1m below meniscus)
Water model under-predicts speed in upper recirculation region(lack of shell resistance to push flow upwards)
3.6 m/min
4.8 m/min
Increasing casting speed linearly increases velocity
3.6 m/min Water model
1 m
0.6 m
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 20
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
-0.05 -0.045 -0.04 -0.035 -0.03 -0.025 -0.02 -0.015 -0.01 -0.005 0
Distance from Centerline, X [m]
Do
wn
wa
rds
Ve
loc
ity
, U
z [
m/s
]
3.6 Water
3.6 Steel
4.2 Steel
4.8 Steel
CenterlineShell Front
Wideface
Downward velocity(through thickness 2m below meniscus)
Water model produces higher speed estimates in lower recirculation region
3.6 m/min
4.8 m/min
Increasing casting speed linearly increases velocity
2 m
0.6 m
3.6 m/min Water model
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 21
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
-0.05 -0.045 -0.04 -0.035 -0.03 -0.025 -0.02 -0.015 -0.01 -0.005 0
Distance from Centerline, X [m]
Do
wn
wa
rds
Ve
loc
ity
, U
z [
m/s
]3.6 Water
3.6 Steel
4.2 Steel
4.8 Steel
CenterlineShell Front
Wideface
Downward velocity(through thickness near NF)
Water model produces excessive speeds low in caster (missing shell)
3.6 m/min
4.8 m/min
Increasing casting speed increases velocity linearly
3 m
0.6 m
3.6 m/min Water model
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 22
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
-0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0
Distance from Centerline, X [m]
Do
wn
wa
rds
Ve
loc
ity
, U
z [
m/s
]
3.6 Water
3.6 Steel
4.2 Steel
4.8 Steel
CenterlineShell Front
Narrowface
Downward velocity(across width 3m below meniscus)
Water model produces excessive speeds low in caster (missing shell)
3.6 m/min
4.8 m/min
Increasing casting speed increases velocity linearly
3 m
3.6 m/min Water model
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 23
Top-Surface Standing Wave Profile
SEN
Narrowface
-8.00
-7.00
-6.00
-5.00
-4.00
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
-0.8 -0.75 -0.7 -0.65 -0.6 -0.55 -0.5 -0.45 -0.4 -0.35 -0.3 -0.25 -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0
Distance from Centerline, X [m]
Su
rfa
ce
He
igh
t D
efo
rma
tio
n, ∆
h [
mm
]
3.6 Water
3.6 Steel
4.2 Steel
4.8 Steel
Steel-slag interface height along wideface centerline approximated using fixed surface pressures
3.6 m/min
4.8 m/ming
ppheight
fluxsteel
mean
∗−−
=)( ρρ
Higher standing waves in steel than water model
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 24
Conclusions: Steel Caster / Water Model
• Water model and steel both have generally similar classic double-roll flow patterns. The funnel effect is small.
• Water model underpredicts velocity in upper mold, including 32% low top surface velocity (0.34 vs 0.48 m/s), and less surface turbulence.
• Steel shell provides resistance to flow (~50% drop in cross section area), so “pushes” more fluid to the surface, increasing recirculation velocities.
• Water jet penetrates deeper than steel jet, impinging ~0.13m lower on NF, due to lack of shell taper restricting downward flow.
• Far below top surface, downward steel flow is nearly uniform (at the casting speed), so all particles penetrating this far are eventually trapped. Water model sends flow disturbances far into strand: producing more eddies in low-velocity regions and extending lower recirculation zone.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 25
Conclusions: Effect of Casting Speed
• Increasing casting speed has little effect on single-phase flow pattern and jet impingement location (-0.835 m below the top surface). Lower recirculation region is extended further down the strand.
• Velocity increases almost linearly with casting speed. Maximum surface velocity increases with casting speed, from 0.48 m/s (3.6 m/min) to 0.57m/s (4.8 m/min)
• Increasing casting speed produces quadraticallyincreasing top surface wave height and profile
• The highest point of the standing wave occurs near the meniscus and slopes downward to the SEN.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • Metals Processing Simulation Lab • BG Thomas 26
Acknowledgements
• Continuous Casting Consortium Members (Algoma, Baosteel, Corus, Delavan, Labein, LWB Refractories, Mittal Riverdale, Nucor, Postech, Steel Dynamics)
• National Science Foundation– GOALI DMI 05-00453 (Online)
• National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) at UIUC
• Fluent, Inc.• Former UIUC researchers: L. Zhang and J.
Aoki