Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
P R O M OT F. P R Ol E C 'I P R O S P K R
Five-Year Review Report
For ThePalmetto Recycling Superfund Site
Columbia, Richland County, South Carolina
June 2004
PREPARED BY:South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
2600 Bull StreetColumbia, SC 29201
PREPARED FOR:Region 4
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Approved by: & < s^h^-frj Date:Winston A. SmithDirectorWaste Management Division
10114965
Table of Contents
List of Acronyms iii
Executive Summary 1
Five-Year Review Summary Form 2
Section 1. Introduction 4
Section 2. Site Chronology 5
Section 3. Background A. Physical Characteristics B. History of Contamination and Response Action
666
Section 4. Remedial Actions A. Remedy Selection B. Remedy Implementation C. Operation and Maintenance
7888
Section 5. Progress Since the Last Five-Year Review 9
Section 6. Five-Year Review Process A. Administrative Components B. Community Involvement C. Document Review/Data Review D. Site Inspection E. Interviews
9999910
Section 7. Technical Assessment A. Is the Remedy Functioning as Intended by the Decision Documents B. Are the Exposure Assumptions, Toxicity Data, Cleanup Levels, and Remedial Action Objectives (RAOs) used at the Time of the Remedy Selection Still Valid C. Has Any Other Information Come to Light that Could Call into Question the Protectiveness of the Remedy D. Technical Assessment Summary
101010
10
10
Section 8. Issues 10
Section 9. Recommendations and Follow-up Actions 10
Section 10. Protectiveness Statement(s) 11
Section 11. Next Review 11
i
Attachments: A. Site Location Maps B. Groundwater Flow Patterns C. Constituents Found in Soil Before Remediation D. Excavation Verification Survey (Horizontal and Vertical Extent of Excavation) E. Constituents Found in Groundwater Before Remediation F. Constituents Found in Groundwater After Remediation G. Copies of Newspaper Notice - Community Involvement And Interview Documentation Form H. Applicable or Relevant & Appropriate Requirements Review I. List of Documents Reviewed J. Site Inspection Check Form and Photographs
ii
List of Acronyms
ARAR Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement CD Consent Decree CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency EW Extraction Well CFR Code of Federal Regulations ESD Explanation of Significant DifferenceMCL Maximum Contaminant Level MCLG Maximum Contaminant Level Goal MW Monitoring Well NCP National Contingency Plan NPL National Priorities List O&M Operation and Maintenance OU Operable Unit PRP Potentially Responsible Party RA Remedial Action RAO Remedial Action Objective RD Remedial Design RI/FS Remedial Investigation/Feasibility StudyROD Record of Decision RPM Remedial Project Manager SDWA Safe Drinking Water ActSCDHEC South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control VOC Volatile Organic Compound
iii
Executive Summary
The Palmetto Recycling Site is located about 8 miles north of Columbia, South Carolina, in rural Richland County.The site is positioned between U.S. Routes 321 and 21 on the north side of Koon Store Road (State RoadS-40-61). The Site occupies approximately 1.5 acres.
Palmetto Recycling, Inc. purchased the property in 1979 for the purpose of operating a battery recycling company.From 1979 to 1983, the facility was involved in the reclamation of lead from batteries. A below-grade fiberglasscollection sump received wastewater contaminated with sulfuric acid from various plant operations. A studyconducted by SCDHEC identified elevated concentrations of lead and iron in the groundwater samples collectednext to the sump. The investigation also revealed the presence of elevated concentrations of lead in on-site soils.
On March 30, 1995, EPA issued a Record of Decision that selected a remedy of excavation of contaminatedsurface soil (one foot) that exceeded the remediation goal of 400 ppm for lead. The excavated area was backfilledwith clean soil. The Record of Decision also required groundwater monitoring to confirm that the remedy waseffective at protecting human health and the environment.
The cleanup levels established in the Record of Decision for soil have been met. In addition, current groundwatermonitoring indicates that the groundwater concentrations for lead are below the health-based level of 15 parts perbillion (ppb). The Site was deleted from the NPL on October 13,2000.
1
Five-Year Review Summary Form
SITE IDENTIFICATION
Site name: Palmetto Recycling
EPAID:SCD037398120
Region: 4 State: SC City/County: Columbia / Richland County
SITE STATUS
NPL Status: D Final X Deleted D Other (specify)
Remediation Status (choose all that apply): D Under Construction D Operating X Complete
Multiple OUs? D YES X NO Construction completion date: 02 / 03 / 1999
Has site been put into reuse? D YES X NO
REVIEW STATUS
Lead agency: x EPA State D Tribe U Other Federal Agency
Author name: Yvonne Jones
Author title: Remedial Project Manager Author affiliation: U.S. EPA, Region 4
Review period: 02 / 18/2004 to 047 19/2004
Date(s) of site inspection: 04 /14 / 2004
Type of review:LJ Post-SARA Q Pre-SARAD Non-NPL Remedial Action SiteX Regional Discretion_______
L'NPL-Rcmoval only[iNPLState/Tribc-LeadD Statutory Review
Review number: x 1 (first) 2 (second) D 3 (third) Hi Other (specify)
Triggering action:D Actual RA On-site Construction at OU #X Construction CompletionD Other (specify)
D Actual RA Start at OU#D Previous Five-Year Review Report
Triggering action date: 02 / 03 / 1999
Due date: 02/03/2004
Five-Year Review Summary Form, cont'd.
Issues:
No issues have come to light that calls into question the protectiveness of the remedy.
Recommendations and Follow-up Actions: No further action at this Site is recommended at this time.
Protectiveness Statement(s):
All immediate threats at the Site have been addressed, and the remedy is protective of human health and theenvironment.
Long-term Protectiveness:
The cleanup goals established in the Record of Decision for soil have been met. The long-term protectiveness of theremedial action was verified by continued monitoring of groundwater to confirm that the remedy was effective atprotecting human health and the environment. Current groundwater monitoring indicates that the groundwaterconcentrations for lead are below the health-based level of 15 parts per billion (ppb).
3
Section 1. Introduction
The purpose of the five-year review is to determine whether the remedy at a site is protective of human health andthe environment. The methods, findings, and conclusions of reviews are documented in Five-Year Review reports.In addition, Five-Year Review reports identify issues found during the review, if any, and identify recommendationsto further evaluate and address them as necessary.
The Agency is preparing this Five-Year Review report pursuant to CERCLA § 121 and the National ContingencyPlan (NCP). CERCLA § 121 states:
If the President selects a remedial action that results in any hazardous substances, pollutants, orcontaminants remaining at the site, the President shall review such remedial action no less oftenthan each five years after the initiation of such remedial action to assure that human health and theenvironment are being protected by the remedial action being implemented. In addition, if upon suchreview it is the judgment of the President that action is appropriate at such site in accordance withsection [104] or [106], the President shall take or require such action. The President shall report tothe Congress a list of facilities for which such review is required, the results of all such reviews, and any actions taken as a result of such reviews.
The Agency interpreted this requirement further in the NCP; 40 CFR § 300.430(f)(4)(ii) states:
If a remedial action is selected that results in hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminantsremaining at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, the leadagency shall review such action no less often than every five years after the initiation of the selectedremedial action.
The EPA-Region 4 in conjunction with SCDHEC conducted the five-year review of the remedy implemented at thePalmetto Recycling Superfund Site in Columbia, South Carolina. This review was conducted for the Site fromFebruary 2004 through April 2004. This report documents the results of the review.
This is the first five-year review for the Palmetto Recycling Site. As required by the ROD and at the request ofSCDHEC, a five-year review is being conducted to assess the continued effectiveness of the remedial action and tosummarize the data obtained from groundwater monitoring.
4
Section 2. Site Chronology
Table 1 - Chronology of Site Events
Event Date
Palmetto Recycling, Inc. purchases the property for the purpose of operating abattery recycling company
1979
Palmetto Recycling involved in the reclamation of lead from batteries 1979 to 1983
SCDHEC denies applications by Palmetto Recycling, Inc. to operate a hazardouswaste facility and to transport hazardous wastes
1981
Palmetto Recycling files for bankruptcy 02/11/1983
10,800 gallons of contaminated water is collected by Bryson Industries Services and taken to Alternate Energy Resources
04/25/1984
100 drums containing liquid caustic waste are removed from the Site 1984
A total of 365 tons of soils removed from various areas on-site and placed in off-sitelandfills
1985 and 1986
EPA conducts a Preliminary Assessment 1987
The Palmetto Recycling Site added to the NPL 07/1987
EPA conducts Remedial Investigation field activities at the Site 04/1993 to 06/1993; 03/1994 to 07/1994
EPA issues a Record of Decision 03/30/1995
Consent Decree is signed between the United States and Lucent Technologies, Inc. 05/1997
Remedial Design for the specific remedial actions is approved 04/1998
Several components of the Remedial Design are implemented 11/1998- 01/1999
Approximately 947 cubic yards of soil is excavated down to one-foot and removed from the Site and backfilled with clean material
01/12/1999- 02/03/1999
Remedial Action Final inspection 02/17/1999
Final Close-Out Report issued 07/21/1999
The Site is deleted from the NPL 10/13/2000
5
Section 3. Background
The Palmetto Recycling Site is located about 8 miles north of Columbia, South Carolina, in rural Richland County.The site is positioned between U.S. Routes 321 and 21 on the north side of Koon Store Road (State RoadS-40-61). It occupies approximately 1.5 acres and is bounded by Koon Store Road to the south, an unnamed dirtroad (and farther removed, Dry Fork Creek) to the east, an unnamed tributary of Dry Fork Creek to the north, anda residence to the west (EPA, 1995).
A. Physical Characteristics
The Site is situated in the Piedmont Physiographic Province and the Carolina Slate Belt Geologic Province of SouthCarolina. The Carolina Slate Belt is part of an extensive group of metamorphosed, volcanic, and sedimentary rocksoccurring along the southeast edge of the Piedmont Province from Georgia to Virginia. In the vicinity of the site,these rocks consist of meta-argillite, phyllite, volcanic tuff and volcanic flows of the Asbill Pond Formation. Most of these rocks are mantled by residual soil that is developed through in-situ weathering of fractured or jointedmetamorphic rocks.
Lithologic evaluation of split-spoon and core samples (limited to the upper 84 feet of materials) was conducted withfield descriptions and geotechnical tests. Lithologic evaluation of split-spoon samples showed soils and saprolitewere composed of varying combinations of gravel, sand, silt, and clay. The dominant lithologies were clay and silt,the primary constituents of argillite. Sands were typically fine-grained. Soil colors included red, yellow, gray, brown,and green.
The initial assessment of hydrogeological conditions at the Site was conducted by SCDHEC. Groundwater datacollected during this assessment consisted of water table measurements collected from five monitoring wells. Resultsof the measurements indicated the depth to groundwater was 5 to 11 feet below ground surface. Water tablecontours indicate the direction of groundwater is southeast toward Dry Fork Creek (EPA, 1995).
B. History of Contamination and Response Action
Palmetto Recycling, Inc. purchased the property on Koon Store Road in 1979 for the purpose of operating abattery recycling company. From 1979 to 1983, the facility was involved in the reclamation of lead from batteries.It is unknown what activities occurred onsite prior to 1979. A collection sump received wastewater contaminatedwith sulfuric acid from various plant operations. The sump was a below-grade fiberglass tank in an unlined pit.Specific neutralization process details are unknown, but at some point, Palmetto Recycling started dischargingwastewater of unknown composition to the local sewer system. In addition, a former employee reported that duringoperations, liquid wastes were dumped north of the site, outside the fenced area.
After discharging wastewater for an unknown period of time, Palmetto Recycling attempted to obtain a dischargepermit. In 1981, the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) deniedapplications by Palmetto Recycling, inc. to operate a hazardous waste facility and to transport hazardous wastes.After this attempt, some waste liquids were sent offsite to an acid recycler and some were disposed of onsite. It isnot known if these wastes were neutralized before shipment or onsite disposal. The quantities are also unknown.Plastic battery cases and lead plates were eventually sold to other companies as reusable materials. A studyconducted by SCDHEC identified elevated concentrations of lead and iron in the groundwater samples collectednext to the sump. High levels of lead, barium, and chromium were found in sediment from the unnamed stream that
6
runs north of the Site. The investigation also revealed the presence of elevated concentrations of lead in on-sitesoils. SCDHEC noted the presence of a five-foot deep, unlined acid pit containing 1,800 gallons of acid waste atthe Site, as well as 100 drums of caustic waste and an unstable pile of battery casings.
On February 11, 1983, Palmetto Recycling filed for bankruptcy and Ryan Hovis was appointed trustee. In 1984,workers removing equipment from the Site destroyed a section of the roof that covered the on-site wastewatercollection sump. The wastewater consisted of lead oxide and sulfuric acid from the wash process. As a result of thisincident, sump water percolated through soils adjacent to the pit area. To address immediate health andenvironmental risks posed by the Site, three removal actions have occurred at the Site. On April 25, 1984, 10,800gallons of contaminated water were collected by Bryson Industries Services and taken to Alternate EnergyResources. Later in 1984, approximately 100 drums containing liquid caustic waste were removed from the Site.On October 2, 1985, SCDHEC authorized Future Fuel Development, Inc., to remove site soils contaminated withlead and chromium. A total of 365 tons of soils were removed from various areas on-site and placed in off-sitelandfills during 1985 and 1986.
In 1986, EPA conducted a Preliminary Assessment of the Site. EPA proposed the Site for inclusion on theNational Priorities List (NPL) in January 1987. The Palmetto Recycling Site was formally added to the NPL in July1987.
In 1992, EPA negotiated with parties it had identified as Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) for the Site toconduct a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS). An agreement was not reached between EPA and theparties. Therefore, EPA conducted RI Field activities at the Site from April 1993 through June 1993 and fromMarch 1994 through July 1994 (EPA, 1995).
In May 1997, a Consent Decree was signed between the United States and one PRP. EPA and the South CarolinaDepartment of Health and Environmental Control approved a Remedial Design for the specific remedial actions inApril 1998. From November 1998 through January 1999, several components of the Remedial Action wereimplemented, which included verification sampling and analysis, monitoring well abandonment, a structuralinspection, an asbestos survey analysis, approval of backfill material and permitting activities. The verificationsample test results, together with previous RI and Remedial Design (on-site and residential) test results, were usedto further refine excavation boundaries and confirm that residential properties were not contaminated. Sampleresults showed that lead levels in the adjacent residential yard were below 400 ppm. Based on this data, revised(reduced) excavation boundaries were approved by EPA and SCDHEC on December 24, 1998. BetweenJanuary 11, 1999 and February 3, 1999, a total of 363 drums of Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) wereappropriately segregated, characterized and removed off-site to a RCRA qualifying facility. In addition,approximately 6,500 gallons of liquid IDW were removed off-site to a qualifying publicly owned treatment works(Direct, 2000).
EPA and SCDHEC found that the remedy significantly reduced the release of contaminants to the environment andcontinues to provide adequate protection to human health. Consequently, the Site was deleted from the NPLOctober 13, 2000.
Section 4. Remedial Actions
As a result of the Baseline Risk Assessment, EPA determined that remediation of surface soil would be required forthe protection of human health and the environment. The remediation level of 400 ppm for lead is designed to
7
protect children from developing lead blood levels above 10 µg/dl. The Baseline Risk Assessment concluded thatthe subsurface soils, the surface water, and the sediments at the Site were not media of concern.
A. Remedy Selection
On March 30, 1995, EPA issued a Record of Decision that selected the following remedy:
SURFACE SOIL - SOURCE CONTROL • Excavate contaminated surface soil that exceeds the remediation level of 400 ppm for lead and
verification sampling; • Backfill the excavated area with clean soil and establish a vegetative cover to minimize undue
surface water runoff and minimize erosion; • Transport soil exceeding the Land Disposal Restriction (LDR) of 5 ppm for lead using the Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test to a RCRA Subtitle C Facility. Transport soil notexceeding the 5 ppm LDR to a Subtitle D solid waste landfill.
SITE MONITORING • Monitor groundwater on an annual basis for at least five years to evaluate the Site progress.
ADDITIONAL SAMPLING • Collect additional confirmation samples from the adjacent residential yards and from the dirt road
that borders the Site to the east to confirm the absence of soil contamination. (EPA, 1995).
B. Remedy Implementation
Soil excavation activities began on January 12, 1999. Approximately 947 cubic yards of soil were excavated downto one-foot and removed from the Site. After excavation was completed in each area, a post-excavation surveywas performed to verify removal of the top one-foot of soil. Excavated soil and sediment were transported to anddisposed at a qualifying Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facility. Backfilling the Site with cleansoil provided further assurance that the Site no longer poses any threats to human health or the environment.Construction activities concluded on February 3, 1999.
Although contaminants were no longer impacting the groundwater at the Site, the Record of Decision requiredgroundwater monitoring to confirm that the remedy was effective at protecting human health and the environment(Direct, 2000).
C. Operation and Maintenance
The cleanup goals established in the Record of Decision for soil have been met. In addition, groundwatermonitoring indicates that the groundwater concentrations for lead are below the health-based level of 15 parts perbillion (ppb). The concentration levels detected during groundwater monitoring range from non-detect to 3.2 ppb(Direct, 2000). Operation and maintenance cost information is not currently available.
8
Section 5. Progress Since the Last Five-Year Review
This is the first Five Year Review for this Site.
Section 6. Five-Year Review Process
A. Administrative Components
SCDHEC initiated the five-year review in February 2004. The components of this Five-Year review consist ofcommunity involvement, data/document review, site inspection, and interviews, as summarized below.
B. Community Involvement
Activities involving the community in the Five-Year review were initiated with a notice that was sent to the localnewspaper stating that a Five-Year review was to be conducted. This notice was posted in The State Newspaperon April 11, 2004. A copy of the public notice is provided in Attachment G of this report.
Within thirty (30) calendar days of the report finalization, a notice will be published in The State Newspaperannouncing that the Five-Year Review report for the Palmetto Recycling Superfund site is complete, and that theresults of the review and the report are available to the public at the Northeast Regional Library (7490 ParklaneRoad, Columbia, SC 29223; Ph: 803-736-6575). This report will also be placed in the Administrative file at boththe EPA Region 4 and SCDHEC offices.
C. Document Review/Data Review
This Five-Year review consisted of a review of relevant documents including O&M records and monitoring data(See Attachment J).
The cleanup levels established in the Record of Decision for soil have been met. Approximately 947 cubic yards ofsoil were excavated down to one-foot and removed from the Site. Confirmation was conducted verify the removalof the top one-foot of soil. Excavated soil and sediment were transported to and disposed at a qualifying ResourceConservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facility. Backfilling the Site with clean fill provided further assurance thatthe Site no longer poses any threats to human health or the environment. Construction activities concluded onFebruary 3, 1999. fn addition, groundwater monitoring indicates that the groundwater concentrations for lead arebelow the health-based level of 15 parts per billion (ppb). The concentration levels detected during groundwatermonitoring range from non-detect to 3.2 ppb.
D. Site Inspection
Inspection at the Site was conducted on April 14, 2004. The purpose of the inspection was to assess theprotectiveness of the remedy, including the protectiveness of the wells. Representatives from SCDHEC Bureau ofLand and Waste Management participated in this site inspection. The site inspection included walking the Site andinspecting groundwater monitoring wells. No significant protectiveness issues were identified.
The Site inspection check form and site photographs are provided in the Attachment J.
9
E. Interviews
Interviews were conducted with various parties connected to the site. Yvonne Jones (RPM, EPA Region 4) wasinterviewed on April 12, 2004. An interview with the SCDHEC project Manager, Mihir Mehta, was alsoconducted during the site inspection on April 14, 2004. Monitoring well placement, current uses of the propertiessurrounding the Site, and potential future use of the Palmetto Recycling Site were discussed with the SCDHECproject manager during the site inspection. These interviews also discussed the information presented in thedocument review section of this report. Information presented in the Site Inspection Check List also resulted from the interviews conducted. The interview documentation form is in Attachment G.
Section 7. Technical Assessment
A. Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents?
The review of documents, ARARs, and the results of the site inspection indicate that the remedy is functioning asintended by the ROD.
B. Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial actionobjectives (RAOs) used at the time of the remedy selection still valid?
The exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action objectives (RAOs) used at the time ofthe remedy selection are still valid.
C. Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question theprotectiveness of the remedy?
No other information has come to light that calls into question the protectiveness of the remedy.
Technical Assessment Summary:
According to the data reviewed, the site inspection, and the interviews, the remedy is functioning as intended by theROD. There have been no changes in the physical conditions of the Site that would affect the protectiveness of theremedy. There have been no changes to the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, or remedial actionobjectives (RAOs) used at the time of the remedy selection. There is no other information that calls into questionthe protectiveness of the remedy.
Section 8. Issues
No issues have come to light that calls into question the protectiveness of the remedy.
Section 9. Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions
No further action at this Site is recommended at this time.
10
Section 10. Protectiveness Statement
The remedy is protective of human health and the environment under current conditions. Monitoring data indicatethat the remedy is functioning as required to achieve protectiveness of human health and the environment.
Section 11. Next Review
The cleanup levels established in the ROD for soil have been met. In addition, current groundwater monitoringindicates that the groundwater concentrations for lead are below the health-based level of 15 ppb. Theconcentration levels detected during groundwater monitoring range from non-detect to 3.2 ppb. As required by theROD and at the request of SCDHEC, a five-year review was conducted to assess the continued effectiveness ofthe remedial action and to summarize the data obtained from groundwater monitoring. Another five-year review forthe Palmetto Recycling Superfund Site is not required.
11
ATTACHMENT A
Site Location Maps
G:\ott\polmetto\remd\rev\sitemap.dwg 4/20/99 8:39 am
COLUMBIARICHLAND COUNTY
PALMETTORECYCLING
SOURCE: RlAS REPORT, COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORP.. NOVEMBER 1994
REMEDIAL ACTIONPALMETTO RECYCLING SITE
RICHLAND COUNTY,SOUTH CAROLINA
LAWCNQNURINC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
SITE LOCATION MAP
JOB NO. 41-2603-02 FIGURE 1
-EXISTING CONCRETE PAD WITHSTEEL (RAUE SUPERSTRUCTURE
LEGEND___ FFNCC
—— ...—— iNTtRUITICNT DRAINAGE
• ULlf MONilOHWG WELL« INlfRUCDUlF UQNIIOHINC WILL• 'jHAUOW UQNIIORINC WtU
» A8AMOONCD MONUORtNC WCLl
SCAIE IN f f f l
K>« - Ri iNVtSltCAnvt OCRiVCO WASH.SOUBO. Of BASt UAP: BIAS BEPOfll COu rfOCRAL PROCRAUS CORP. NOvCMBCR 1994
REMEDIAL ACTION-PALMETTO RECYCLING SITElCHl AND COIJN1 Y. *>C
SITE IAYOUT ANDWELL LOCATION MAP
41-2603-02rrr-n—rrrrs-r. ;—iCURt 2
ATTACHMENT B
Groundwater Flow Patterns
LEGEND
——- 1REELINE* SHALLOW MONITOR WLU
a SEDIMENT SAMPLE
240-CONTOUR OF EQUALWATER ELEVATION (fl. 6/2/93)
(2-10.31) WATER ELEVATION (msi.n)DIRECTION OF GROUNOWMERFLOW
5G-06
M W - 4 S
(237.25)
SCALE IN TEET
COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATIONa subsidiary of Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
Lr-1
COM FPC ARCS IV
POTENTIOMETRIC S'URFACE MAP OF SHALLOW WATER B E A R I N G ZONEPALMETTO RECYCLING
COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA FIGURE No.
CDc.
LEGEND
— «--- FENCE——— TRCfLINE
INIERMEDIATE MON-.IOR WELL
CONfCilR Of" fOUALWAlL'R [ lEVA i iON (!l. 6/:/9
(24? 32) WATER TABLE ElP/AHON (msl.il)
"""— -— «^. DIRECTION OF CROUNDWATERFLOW
0 C>G 100
SCALE IN FEET
G
COM FPC ARCS IV
POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP OF INTERMEDIATE WATER BEARING ZONEPALMETTO RECYCLING
COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA FIGURE No. 2
c
COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATIONa subsidiary of Camp Dresser & McKec Inc.
LEGEND
—<—— FENCE———- IRECL"jE
• DEEP MONITOR WELL
CONTOUR OF EQUAL240———— WAIER ELEVATION ( f t . 6/2/93)
(246 90) WATER IABLE ELEVATION (msl.C.)
~~~—-~ DIRECTION OF CROUNDWA1ERFLOW
SCALE IN FECT
UH-4D(236.47)
COM FPC ARCS IV
POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP OF DEEP WATER BEARING ZONEPALMETTO RECYCLING
COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA FIGURE No. 3
Oc(J"loo
COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATIONa subsidiary of Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ATTACHMENT C
Constituents Found in Soil Before Remediation
Palmetto Recvcling Site - Remedial Design Work PlanLAW Project 41-2603-02
June 2.5. 199'
Table 1: Previous Surface Soil Sample Results for Lead'
Sample Location
SS-01SS-02SS-03SS-04SS-05SS-06SS-07SS-08
DlD2D3D4D5D6D7D8
PR-01PR-02PR-03PR-04PR-05
PR-06(2)
PR-07(2)
PR-08
Lead Concentration(ppm)
15.1160140
1,5005802937
410630
6,40065591601903801106706.9J22J6.3J160J14J
300J120J
Notes:(1) Results from Table 3-5 of the RJ/FS, November 16, 1994.(2) For duplicate and split samples, this table reports the highest
value detected at each location.J - Denotes estimated value.
Prepared by/Date: CMH 12/2/96Checked by/Date: AMM 12/4/96
Palmetto Recycling SiteFinal Construction/Remedial Action ReportLAW Project 41-2603-02
May 6, 1999(Revised July 13. 1999)
Table I: Total Lead Analytical Results for Surface Soil SamplesRemedial Action - Verification Samples
SampleIdentification
RAS-101RAS-102RAS-103RAS-104RAS-105RAS-106RAS-107RAS-108RAS-109RAS-110RAS-111RAS-112RAS-113RAS-114RAS-115RAS-116RAS-117RAS-118RAS-119RAS-120RAS-121*RAS-122*RAS-123RAS-201RAS-202
SampleDate
1 7-Nov-98!7-Nov-9818-Nov-9817-Nov-9817-Nov-9818-Nov-9817-Nov-9818-Nov-981 7-Nov-9817-Nov-98!7-Nov-9818-Nov-98l8-Nov-9817-Nov-9817-Nov-981 7-Nov-9817-Nov-9818-Nov-98l7-Nov-9818-Nov-981 7-Nov-981 7-Nov-981 8-Nov-985-Jan-995-Jan-99
Detection Limit(ppm)
1.651.691.421.691.561.691.641.598.261.591.541.501.591.721.751.641.748.401.591.681.611.711.671.721.69
Lead Concentration(ppm)
116128
82.258.072.217.770.1152916240301542433633108
54.8185
1320131
38.914.71 1 1232264222
Note:Lead analyzed by SW-846, Method 6010.Total lead results for all three equipment blanks were non-detect.ppm - parts per million
*RAS-122 is a field duplicate of RAS-104 (Table 2) andRAS-123 is a field duplicate of RAS-108 (Table 2).
Page 1 ofPrepared By: ACW12/14/98
Checked By: CED 4/22/99
Palmetto Recycling SiteFinal Construction/Remedial Action ReportLAW Project 41-2603-02
Mav6. 1999
Table 2: Field Duplicate Results for Surface Soil SamplesRemedial Action - Verification Samples
SampleIdentification
RAS-104RAS-108
SampleDate
17-Nov-9818-Nov-98
DetectionLimit(ppm)
1.691.59
LeadConcentration
(ppm)58152
FieldDuplicate
IdentificationRAS-122RAS-123
DetectionLimit(ppm)
1.711.67
LeadConcentration
(ppm)1 1 1232
Note:Lead analyzed by SW-846, Method 6010ppm - parts per million
Page 1 of:Prepared Uy: ACW 12/14/98
Checked Bv: CEO 4/22/99
EXISTING CONCRETEPAD WITH STEELFRAME SUPERSTRUCTURE
NO SAM*U3 Wtt OUICm VO.OW lit CCMCKTZ FOUNDATION win SAJ*>UNC AT T« COSING CTNO»CTt nxjNOATXW* Ml»ira «M CCUCCTED racw 3CCIMNT AKnc IX FOMOATKM »rtM 1MVUKC AT nc onmc OMCIVTT rauNDATKUKZ CF « 3ATA: «/n KPOHT COM FtKRAL P*nGKAUS C«f>^ NOVCWBDt lt>4
LEGEND
in oocBnooi oi mo
SCALE IN FEET
PALMETTO RECYCLING SITE
RICHLAND COC'.MTY. SCSURFACE SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS
AND LEAD ANALYTICAL RESULTS 41-2603-02
ATTACHMENT D
Excavation Verification Survey (Horizontal and Vertical Extent of Excavation)
U.S. EPA Region IV
SDMSUnscannable Material Target Sheet
DocID: IQMMA6 Site ID:
Site Name:
Nature of Material;
Map:
Photos:
Blueprints:
Slides:
Other (describe):
Amount of material:
Computer Disks:
CD-ROM:
Oversized Report:
Log Book:
*Please contact the appropriate Records Center to view the material.*
ATTACHMENT E
Constituents Found in Groundwater Before Remediation
Results from Table 5-3 of the RI/FS, November 16,1994
Table 1STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF CONSTITUENTS DETECTED IN GROUNDWATER
PALMETTO RECYCLING SITECOLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA
Constituent.
Inorganics
ArsenicBariumCobalt
ChromiumCopper
MolybdenumNickelLead
StrontiumTitaniumVanadium
YttriumZinc
MercuryAluminumManganese
CalciumMagnesium
IronSodium
Potassium
Volatile Organics
ChloroformCarbon disulfide
Methyl ethyl ketone
Semi-volatile organics
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
•: ••:",. •• •. •: ;• BACICGRpUND SAMPLES I;
Background; . Concentration ••i'-;'5v-::"Raihge':- • ' ;: ;. :; WL)
ND(2 - 15)11-50
ND(8) - 22ND(2) - 9.8ND(3) - 18ND(2) - 3.5
ND(30) - 5,300ND( l ) -9 .3
4 7 - 7 8ND(2) - 68ND(2) - 14ND(2) - 5.8
9.1 - 120ND(0.10-0.2)
ND(50) - 13,000530- 1,800
3,200 - 6,8002,800 - 4,8006,000 - 28,0006,700 - 16,000ND(400) - 630
ND(10)ND(10) - 3
ND(10)
ND(10) - 36
:: :;:.L Average ;•:* •-"'• •: Background •Concentration
>^(Mg/Lr:-.'';;.
0329
5.2101.88984.458306.43.0570
4,285852
4,9503,86711,36712,2832,282
04.33
0
15.33
;•••.•'.;. Baseline .Concentration'^;^^^
0641810203.6
1,7968.81166013
6.01140
8,5701,7049,9007,734
22,73424,5664,564
08.66
0
30.66
NQN^ACKGRQIJI^ISAI^LES :
i^tebiic^htratibi^.:;-^•^'••^•R^nge::;'-:^';-'.:".
W:&«^&
ND(2) - 3814-82
ND(4) - 25ND(2) - 25ND(2) - 29ND(2) -3 .1ND(20) - 79ND(1)- 19
17 -71ND(2) - 10ND(2) - 3
ND(2)ND(20) - 180
ND(0.10)-0.26ND(90) - 20,000
290- 1,600750 - 20,000
1,400 - 12,0004,600 - 44,0003,200 - 42,000
ND(400) - 4,300
ND(10) - 6ND(10) - 7ND(10) - 9
ND(10)
•D'f-Vivy^auy.fi'^f'.ill^imiiftji
211362
1 (out of 3)85
3 (out of 3)1 (out of 3)
10 (out of 3)
101811111111113
1 (out of 9)1 (out of 9)1 (out of 9)
0 (out of 9)
Baseline concentration = background concentration multiplied by a factor of 2.ND() = Not detected. The number in parenthesis is the sample quantitation limit.
Results from Table 5-4 of the RI/FS, November 16,1994
Table 2
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING SUMMARYPALMETTO RECYCLING SITE
COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA
V< VT1LE ORGAN1CSCh >formCai oon disulfideMi "1 ethyl ketoncSE -VOLATILE ORGANICSBis ethylhexyl)phthalateMETALSArsenicBariumCobaltChromiumCopperMolybdenumNickelLeadStrontiumTitaniumVanadiumYttriumZincMercuryAluminumManganeseCalciumMagnesiumIronSodiumPotassium
MW-01SRound 1
10U10U10U
10U
2U268U820UNA30U7NANA20UNA77o.iou4100530370028001200067002800U
MW-OISRound 2
NANANA
NA
15U468.14.6142.0U126.878209.65.8510.2U1300055032003400940016000560
MW-OHRound 1
10U3J10U
36
2U1120U630UNA53003UNANA4UNA26O.IOU44095044003700670011000I800U
MW-OHRound 2
NANANA
NA
15U50229.8183.5409.34768142.31200.2U87001800530048002800012000630
MW-OIDRound 1
10U10U10U
10U
4U2910U3U3UNA30U2UNANA4UNA590.1 OUsou6606800440060001400020000U
MW-OIDRound 2
NANANA
NA
15U304.92.0U2.42.0U8.4IU502.0U2.0U20U9.10.2U4262063004100610014000400U
MW-02SRound 1
NANANA
NA
NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA
MW-02SRound 1 (DUP)
10U10U10U
IOU
6U3230U3U20UNA30U5UNANA3UNA67O.IOU16005607501400670058002400U
MW-02IRound 1
IOUIOUIOU
IOU
387540U1730UNA7915NANA30UNA180O.IOU84001600920065004400032004300U
MW-02IRound 2
NANANA
NA
15U14146.04.63.1303.517103.02.0U280.2U18009703900430079003200400U
MW-02DRound i :; .
IOUIOUIOU
IOU
5U3120U3U3UNA273UNANA3UNA20UO.IOU360U6002000038007200100003200U
Concentrations presented in ug/1
NA lot analyzedJ .stimated value
U Material was anlayzed for but not detected. The number is the minimum quantitation limit.U.' Material was analyzed for but not detected. The number is estimated for the minimum quantitation limit.
MW - Monitor wellS -ShallowI - IntermediateD-Deep
CD
CD
Results from Table 5-4 of the RI/FS, November 16,1994
Table 2(continued)
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING SUMMARYPALMETTO RECYCLING SITE
COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA
VOLATILE ORGANICSChloroformCarbon disulOdcMethyl ethyl kctoneSEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICSBis(2-ethylhexyl)phlhalateMETALSArsenicBariumCobaltChromiumCopperMolybdenumNickel_xadStrontiumTitaniumVanadiumYttriumZincMercuryAluminumManganeseCalciumMagnesiumron
Sodium'otassium
.::.-, MW-03SRound 1
IOU10UIOU
IOU
196050U2529NA6911NANA30UNA160O.IOU20000110040001200042000120004300
MW-03IRound I
6J7JIOU
IOU
7U4840U4AllNA6219NANA3UNA86O.IOU6500160011000740018000420004700U
MW-03IRound 2
NANANA
NA
15U20252.0U2.0U2.0U26l.OU692.0U20U2.0U370.2U1701300540052001000013000740
MWrOSI
Round2(DUP)
NANANA
NA
15U21242.0U2.0U2.0U26l.OU712.0U2.0U2.0U390.2U1501300550053001000014000490
MW-03DRound )
IOUIOUIOU
IOU
4U52IOU3U3UNA40U3UNANA3UNA27O.IOU130U6201200083007100120002700U
MW-03D - • . . . :Round I (UUP)
IOUIOUIOU
IOU
4U5320U3U3UNA30U2UNANA3UNA25O.IOUI IOU6201200083007100120003000U
MW-04S ..'.;Round 1
IOUIOUIOU
IOU
2U7020U820UNA565NANA20UNA45O.IOU5100290260040001600087002700U
:: MW-04I •Round I.
IOUIOUIOU
IOU
5U4220U33UNA462UNANA3UNA300.26500760550046001200083002400U
: MW-04D' : ' . : ' Round 1
IOUIOU9J
IOU
4U824U3U2.7UNA20U2UNANA3UNA24O.IOU90U4301300081004600110002700U
Concentrations presented in ug/l
NA - Not analyzedJ - Estimated value
U - Material was anlayzed for but not detected. The number is the minimum quanlitation limit.UJ - Material was analyzed for but not detected. The number is estimated for the minimum quanlitation limit.
MW - Monitor wellS -ShallowI - Intermediate
D-Dcep
CM
o
CD
toO
ATTACHMENT F
Constituents Found in Groundwater After Remediation
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION 4, SCIENCE and ECOSYSTEM SUPPORT DIVISION
ATHENS, GEORGIA 30605-2720
4SES-EI JAN 1 8 2000
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Palmetto Recycling Site DataColumbia, South CarolinaSESD Project Number: 00-0013
At FROM: Tim Simpson, Environmental ScientistHazardous Waste Section
THRU: Archie Lee, ChiefHazardous Waste Section
TO. Yvonne Jones, RPMNorth Site Management BranchWaste Management Division
Attached are the analytical results for the groundwater samples collected on November
11, 1999 at the Palmetto Recycling Site in Columbia, South Carolina. The results indicated that
that mercury (1 .9J ug/1) was detected in one sample (PR04SMW). If you have any questions,
please call me at (706) 355-8736.
Attachment
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYRegion 4
Science and Ecosystem Support Division980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
MEMORANDUM
Date: 01711/2000
Subject: Results of METALS Inorganic Chemistry Section Sample Analysis00-0013 Palmetto Recycling
SC
From: Gulhrie, Diane
To: Simpson, Tim
CC: WMD/NSMB
•QA Office
Mtached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have anyquestions, please contact me.
ATTACHMENT
December 13, 1999INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT
Case Number: 27547Project NumberSite: Palmetto
Sample No.558
559
560
5 ^^ A^ ^
562
5G3
5C-1
A
: 00-0013Recyclinq,
ElementSbCrMnHgK
AlSbMnHgK
SbCu
MnHgK
SbHgKTl
SbFeHgK
SbAs
CrCu
MnHgK
SbAs
CrMnHgKAg
Columbia
FlaqJUJJJ
UJJRJ
JU
JRJ
JRJU
JURUJ
JU
UU
JRJ
JU
UJRJU
, scReason
Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%Baseline instability in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limit ^•i" V;j' '"*Serial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%
Positives in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 73.3%Matrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%
Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but: < CRDLMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%
Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%Baseline instability in cal blanks
Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%Positives in cal blanksBlind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference =52.1%Positives in cal blanks
Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLBaseline instability in cal blanks% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%
Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLBaseline instability in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%Baseline instability in cal blanks
December 13, 1999INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)
Case Number; 27547Project NumberSite: Palmetto
Sample No.565
566
567
•568
569
>70
A
.- 00-0013Recyclina,
ElementSbAs
BaMnHgK
SbAs
MnHgK
SbAs
MnHgK
SbAs
MnHgK
AlSbAs
Cd
Cu
MnHgK
SbBaCrMnHgKV
Columbia
FlapJU
UJRJ
JU
JRJ
JU
JRJ
JU
JRJ
UJU
U
U
JRJ
JUUJ .RJU
, sc
ReasonMatrix spike recovery = 73.3%% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLPositives in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%
Matrix spike recovery = 73,3%% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%
Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%
Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52:1%
Positives in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 73.3%% RSD > 20%, for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDL% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDL% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%
Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%Positives in cal blanksBaseline instability in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%Baseline instability in cal blanks
December 13, 1999INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS"REPORT (continued)
Case Number; 27547Project NumberSite: Palmetto
Sample No.571
S72
: 00-0013Recyc liner.
ElementAlSbCrFeMnHgK
AlSbMnHgK
Columbia,
FlaqUJUUJRJ
UJJRJ
SC
ReasonPositives in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 73.3%Baseline instability in cal blanksPositives in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference =
Positives in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 73.3%Matrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference =
52.1%
52.1%
-TALS bAlviri_c era - iv ocou,
Sample 558METALS SCAN
Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR04SMW/Media: GROUNDWATER
Project: 00-0013
SCCase No: 27547MD No: RR98 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by. Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 15:40Ending:
RESULTS3202.1UJ2.2'J20
0.10U0.30U
2600U0.40U
3.52.4
11001.2
2400140J1.9J13
200J1.8U
0.40U7700
2.1U0.50U
14NA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
CYANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is Known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents Z.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample 559METALS SCAN
Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR04IMW/Media: GROUNDWATER
:000 Project: 00-0013
SCCase No: 27547MD No: RR99 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 10:30Ending:
RESULTS35U
2.1UJ2.2U42
0.1 OU0.30U48000.30U
8.40.50U9300
1.1U4000
650J0.10UR
18250J1.8U
0.40U7200
2.1U0.50U
13UNA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKEL .POTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUM ;
THALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
CYANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
.'it I Al_O GMIVlT I-C. AMM/AL. I 01 IV r IUUUV.UWM ucue. u i/ i i/^uuu i*>.
Sample 560METALS SCAN
Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR04DMW /Media: GROUNDWATER
:000 Project: 00-0013
SCCase No: 27547MD No: RSOO Inorg Contractor. SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 15:45Ending:
RESULTS35U
2.1UJ2.2U65
0.1 OU0.30U74000.30U3.01.0U
40001.1U
570031 OJ
0.10UR6.2330J1.8U
0.40U7200
2.1U0.50U
17NA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVER ' ;SODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
CYANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
.£TALi>
Sample 561METALS SCAN
Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PRTUBMW/Media: GROUNDWATER
L000 Project: 00-0013
SCCase No: 27547MD No; RS01 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/199908:20Ending:
RESULTS35U
2.1UJ2.2U
0.80U0.1 OU0.30U2600U0.30U0.60U0.50U
19U1.1U39U
2.4U0.1 OUR
1.3U3.2UJ1.8U
0.40U160U2.8U
0.50U13U
NA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVER ' ;SODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
CYANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
^-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.3-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems. 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2 constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
'ETALS SAMPLt
Sample 562METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PRPB1MW/Media: GROUNDWATER
- KCOIUW iv ocou, MI
Project: 00-0013
SCCase No: 27547MD No: RS02 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 16:10Ending:
RESULTS35U
2.1UJ2.2U
0.801)0.10U0.30U2600U0.30U0.60U0.50U
60U1.1U39U
2.4U0.10UR
1.3U13UJ
1.8U0.40U160U2.2U
0.50U17
NA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
CYANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
ETALS SAMPLt AIWM.TGIG - KCkJlUN IV C5C.OU, M I I* IWl iUWL
Sample 563METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR01DMW/Media: GROUNDWATER
Project: 00-0013
SCCase No: 27547MD No: RRS8 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guihrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/01/1999 15:30Ending:
RESULTS35U
2.1UJ4.71)34
0.1 OU0.30U52000.80U
8.80.80U6800
3.23600660J0.1 OUR
12. 290J
1.8U0.40U
110002.1U
0.50U28
NA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
iYANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
1ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS ERA - REGION IV SESU, Al HLNS, rrouucuon uaie: u i / i i/^uuu 10.00
Sample 564;METALS SCAN
Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR01IMW/Media: GROUNDWATER
2000 Project: 00-0013
SCCase No: 27547MD No: RR39 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/01/1999 17:00Ending:
RESULTS35U
2.1UJ4.4U18
0.10U0.30U5000
1.2U11
0.50U8800
1.1U40001200J0.10UR
23. 270J
1.8U0.80U9500
2.1U0.50U
38NA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
CYANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verificationC-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
rTAL5 SAIVlKUt ANALYSIS
Sample 565METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR03IMW /Media: GROUNDWATER
00 Project: 00-0013
, SCCase No: 27547MD No: RR90 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 10:20Ending:
RESULTS35U
2.1UJ3.2U6.3U
0.10U0.30U32000.30U
130.50U8200
1.1U3900940J
0.10UR22
610J1.8U
0.40U6300
2.1U0.50U
39NA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUM iTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
CYANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present resampling and reanatysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.cons!ituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
PETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV SESD^ATHENS, GA
Sample 566METALS SCAN
Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR3IDMW/Media: GROUNDWATER
000 Project: 00-0013
S^^TI Production Date: 01/11/20
scCase No: 27547MD No: RR91 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 10:20Ending:
RESULTS35U
2.1UJ3.9U8.1
0.10U0.30U38000.30U
160.50U9700
1.1U46001100J0.10UR
27700J1.8U
0.40U7100
2.1U0.50U
45NA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUM . ;SILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
:YANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
^.-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.^-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.3-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
-TALS era - KCOIUU IV ocou, M i nci^o, f~ I UU UUkltwM I LSOtC. V I/ I I / 4 . V W W IW.W
Sample 567METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR02DMW /Media: GROUNDWATER
Project: 00-0013
SCCase No: 27547MD No: RR92 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 11:30Ending:
RESULTS35U
2.1UJ3.7U27
0.1 OU0.30U
51000.30U
7.40.50U
120001.1U
3300770J
0.10UR16
360J1.8U
0.40U8700
2.1U0.50U
13UNA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
:YANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.X-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc Indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS ERA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Hroaucuon uate: uim/*uuu 10:00
Sample 568METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR03DMW /Media: GROUNDWATER
:000 Project: 00-0013
SCCase No: 27547MD No: RR93 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor.Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 11:50Ending:
RESULTS35U
2.1UJ2.3U60
0.10U0.30U
120000.30U
7.00.50U
73001.1U
850061 OJ
0.10UR16
430J1.8U
0.40U10000
2.1U0.50U
13UNA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVER ;SODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
CYANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
1ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS ERA - REGION IV SESD^ATHENS, GA
Sample 569METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PRQ3SMW/Media: GROUNDWATER
:000 Project. 00-0013
Production Date: 01/11/200QJ3:35
scCase No: 27547MD No: RR94 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 12:20Ending:
RESULTS190U2.1UJ3.0U14
0.1 OU0.40U2600U0.30U
5.50.50U6901.1U
910110J
0.10UR3.8380J1.8U
0.40U5000
2.1U0.50U
18NA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
CYANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
.1ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS ERA - REGION IV SESjMyHENS, GA
Sample 5701METALS SCAN
Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR01SMW/Media: GROUNDWATER
Project: 00-0013
sam^ri Production Date: 01/11/2
scCase No: 27547MD No: RR95 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 14:20Ending:
RESULTS9402.1UJ2.2U1.7U
0.1 OU0.30U2600U
1.2U2.83.3
26001.1U
1800260J0.1 OUR9.9
. 270J1.8U
0.40U6100
2.1U1.1U37
NA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUM . ' 'SILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
CYANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
-.-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.-(-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.:'.-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification,^-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV SESD^THENS, GA
Sample 571METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR02SMW/Media: GROUNDWATER
'000 Project. 00-0013
Production Date: 01/11/200.
scCase No: 27547MD No: RR96 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 11:00Ending:
RESULTS110U2.1UJ2.2U24
0.10U0.30U
2600U0.30U
7.12.9150U1.1U
990180J
0.10UR13
170J1.8U
0.40U5800
2.1U0.50U
45NA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
:YANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
•'-.-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.•factual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit,^-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification,^-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2,constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
;ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV SESt^JHENS, GA
Sample 572METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR02IMW/Media: GROUNDWATER
000 Project: 00-0013
Production Date: 01/11/20
scCase No: 27547MDNo: RR97 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 16:05Ending:
RESULTS53U
2.1UJ4.19.0
0.10U0.30U36000.30U
150.50U
110001.1U
410091 OJ
0.10UR34
. 180J1.8U
0.40U8000
2.1U0.50U
40NA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUM ' ;
SILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
:YANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
-'-.-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.•C-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit."Vqc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification,^-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS ERA-REGION IV S
Sample 5METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: QA009PES /Media: WATSPK
2000 Project: 00-0013
THENS, GA Production Date: 01/11/
, scCase No: 27547MD No: RR87 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 14:00Ending:0015542
RESULTS35U
2.1U21
0.80U17
8.42600U
1889
2.7751.1U39U
2.4U1.41.3U291.8U
0.40U160U2.1U
0.50U600
NA
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L
ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE
3YANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.<-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.:3,-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.3-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION 4, SCIENCE and ECOSYSTEM SUPPORT DIVISION
ATHENS, GEORGIA 30605-2720 •'
4SESD-EIB " MAY 0 9 2000
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Palmetto Recycling Site DataColumbia, South CarolinaSESD Project Number: 00-0256
FROM: Tim Simpson, Environmental ScientistSuperfund and Air Section /'
THRU: Archie Lee, Chief <^x^"^"Superfund and Air Section
TO: Yvonne Jones, RPMNorth Site Management BranchWaste Management Division
Attached are the analytical results for the groundwater samples collected on the week of
March 20, 2000 at.the Pal.rne.tto Recycling Site in Columbia, South Carolina. The results
indicated that mercury (0.35 UG/L) was detected in one sample (PR04S). This is the same
well that contained low levels of mercury in the November 1999 sampling event. If you have any
questions, please call me at 706-355-8736.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYRegion 4
Science and Ecosystem Support Division980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
MEMORANDUM
Date: 05/04/2000
Subject: Results of METALS Sample Analysis00-0256 Palmetto Recycling
SC
From: White, TerriTo: Simpson, Tim
CC: SESD/EIB/HWS
Thru: Scifres, JennyChief, Inorganic Chemistry Section • " •Analytical Support Branch
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have anyquestions, please contact me.
ATTACHMENT
METALS SAMPL»YSIS
2000
ERA - REGION IV S
Sample 4228METALS SCAN
Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: QAEB1 /Media: EQUIPMENT RINSE BLANK
2000 Project: 00-0256
HENS, GA Production Date: 05/04/:
SC
Produced by: White, TerriRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/20/2000 12:45Ending:
RESULTS1.0U1.0U
NA1.0U
0.50U0.50U
1.0U5.0U1.0U
0.50U1.0U1.0U
0.50U2.0U1.0U1.0U
NA1.0U
0.50U1.0U1.0USOU
NA0.20U
40U2.0U
0.40U0.020U0.040U0.20U
0.020U
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/L
ANALYTESILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCOBALTCHROMIUM (COPPERMOLYBDENUMNICKELLEADANTIMONYSELENIUMTINSTRONTIUMTELLURIUMTITANIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUMMAGNESIUM ;:IRONSODIUM l
POTASSIUM
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-ma.terial was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.u-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems:. 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
METALS SAMPL ERA-REGION IV S HENS, GA Production Date: 05/04/: 5:07
Sample 4232METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PRQ11/Media: GROUNDWATER
2000 Project: 00-0256
,sc
Produced by: White, TerriRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/20/2000 14:10Ending:
RESULTS1.0U1.1
NA21
0.50U0.50U
125.0U1.0U
0.50U231.0U
0.50U2.0U1.0U30
NA1.0U
0.50U1.0U1.0USOU
NA0.20U
40U1300
4.73.91010
0.21
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/L
ANALYTE :
SILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCOBALTCHROMIUMCOPPERMOLYBDENUMNICKELLEADANTIMONYSELENIUMTINSTRONTIUMTELLURIUMTITANIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUM .MAGNESIUMIRONSODIUMPOTASSIUM
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane •
METALS SAMPL EPA-REGION IV S HENS, GA Production Date: 05/04/
Sample 4229 ~FY 2000 Project: 00-0256METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto Recycling , SCProgram: SSFId/Station: PR01S/Media: GROUNDWATER
Produced by: White, TerriRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/20/2000 13:25Ending:
RESULTS1.0U1.0U
NA4.0
0.50U0.50U
1.0U5.0U2.1
0.50U8.31.0U
0.50U2.0U1.0U5.9
NA1.9
0.50U1.0U1.0USOU
NA0.20U300
241.62.4
0.637.9
0.19
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/L
ANALYTESILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCOBALTCHROMIUMCOPPERMOLYBDENUMNICKELLEADANTIMONYSELENIUMTINSTRONTIUMTELLURIUM ' ;TITANIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUMMAGNESIUMIRON :•SODIUMPOTASSIUM
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 !when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane .
METALS SAMPL EPA - REGION IV SE HENS, GA Production Date: 05/04/2 :07
Sample 4231METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR03S /Media: GROUNDWATER
2000 Project: 00-0256
,sc
Produced by: White, TerriRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/20/2000 14:00Ending:
RESULTS1.0U1.4
NA16
0.50U0.52
7.55.0U2.2
0.50U5.81.2
0.50U2.0U1.0U6.0
NA2.0
0.50U1.0U1.2SOU
NA0.20U570130
0.661.01.36.8
0.34
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/L
ANALYTESILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCOBALTCHROMIUMCOPPERMOLYBDENUM =NICKELLEADANTIMONYSELENIUMTINSTRONTIUMTELLURIUMTITANIUMTHALLIUM ;VANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUMMAGNESIUMIRONSODIUMPOTASSIUM
Vaverage value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of.material.>\-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. -U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.0-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
METALS SAMP LYSIS ERA-REGION IV S HENS, GA Production Date: OS/04/ 5:07
Sample 4230METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: RR02S/Media: GROUNDWATER
rY 2000 Project: 00-0256
,SC
Produced by: White, TerriRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/20/2000 13:40Ending:
RESULTS1.0U1.0U
NA29
0.50U0.50U
8.45.0U4.7
0.50U15
1.0U0.50U
2.0U1.0U3.8
NA1.0U
0.50U1.0U1.0USOU
NA0.20U
91170J
0.40U1.0
0.062A7.1J
0.13
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/L
ANALYTE "SILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCOBALTCHROMIUMCOPPERMOLYBDENUMNICKELLEADANTIMONYSELENIUMTINSTRONTIUMTELLURIUMTITANIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUMMAGNESIUMIRONSODIUMPOTASSIUM
QC RESULTS FOR MANGANESE AND SODIUM ARE ABOVE ACCEPTABLE LIMITS
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence oi' material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: Lwhen no value is reported, see chlordane constituents Z.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane •
METALS SAMPL LYSIS EPA - REGION IV S IfHENS, GA Production Date: OS/04/
Sample 4233METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PRQ4S/Media: GROUNDWATER
2000 Project: 00-0256
SC
Produced by: White, TerriRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/21/2000 10:40Ending:
RESULTS1.0U2.8
NA26
0.50U0.50U
5.05.0U4.0
0.50U16
1.50.50U
2.0U1.0U7.6
NA5.7
0.50U3.61.0USOU
NA0.3514001701.62.72.910
0.53
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/L
ANALYTESILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCOBALTCHROMIUMCOPPERMOLYBDENUMNICKELLEADANTIMONYSELENIUMTINSTRONTIUMTELLURIUMTITANIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUMMAGNESIUM " :
IRONSODIUMPOTASSIUM
•Vaverage value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantisation limit.^-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents Z.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
METALS SAMPLE, YSIS EPA-REGION IV SES [HENS, GA Production Date: 05/04/2 :07
Sample 4234™METALS SCANFacility: PalmettoProgram: SSFId/Station: PRQ4I /
™ "^ 2000 Project: 00-0256 "^^ Produced by: White, Terri ^Requestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSON
Recycling , SC _ . Beginning: 03/21/2000 10:23Ending:
w
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS1 .OU UG/L1.9 UG/L
NA UG/L46 UG/L
0.50U UG/L0.50U UG/L
12 UG/L5.0U UG/L1.0U UG/L
0.50U UG/L23 UG/L
1.0U UG/L0.50U UG/L
2.0U UG/L1.0U UG/L40 UG/L
NA UG/L1.0U UG/L
0.50U UG/L1.0U UG/L1.0U UG/LSOU UG/L
NA UG/L0.20U UG/L
40U UG/L890 UG/L5.3 MG/L4.5 MG/L12 MG/L
9.2 MG/L0.24 MG/L
ANALYTESILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCOBALTCHROMIUMCOPPERMOLYBDENUMNICKELLEAD . :ANTIMONYSELENIUMTINSTRONTIUMTELLURIUMTITANIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUMMAGNESIUMIRONSODIUMPOTASSIUM
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: Lwhen no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
METALS SAMPL LYSIS EPA - REGION IV S ITHENS, GA Production Date: 05/04/i
Sample 4235METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: QAPRE /Media: PRESERVATIVE BLANK
Y 2000 Project: 00-0256
,SC
Produced by: White, TerriRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/21/2000 10:34Ending:
RESULTS1.0U1.0U
NA1.0U
0.50U0.50U
1.0U5.0U1.0U
0.50U1.0U1.0U
0.50U2.0U1.0U1.0U
NA1.0U
0.50U1.0U1.0USOU
NA0.20U
40U2.0U
0.40U0.020U0.092
0.20U0.020U
UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/L
ANALYTESILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUM *COBALTCHROMIUMCOPPERMOLYBDENUMNICKELLEADANTIMONYSELENIUMTIN " :STRONTIUMTELLURIUMTITANIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUMMAGNESIUM -IRONSODIUMPOTASSIUM
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: Lwhen no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane •
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYRegion.4
Science and Ecosystem Support Division980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
MEMORANDUM
Date: 03/28/2000
Subject: Results of CLASSICALS/NUTRIENTS Sample Analysis00-0256 Palmetto Recycling
SC
From: Tnomason, John
To: Simpson, Tim
CC: SESD/EIB/HWS
Thru: Scifres, JennyChief, Inorganic Chemistry Section -: • • - - - - -Analytical Support Branch
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have anyquestions, please contact me.
ATTACHMENT
CLASSICALS/N TS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV S THENS, GA Production Date: 03/28 5:53
Sample 422SPECIFIED TESTSFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR01S/Media: GROUNDWATER
2000 Project: 00-0256
,sc
Produced by: Thomason, JohnRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/20/2000 13:25Ending:
RESULTS UNITS4.7A MG/L
ANALYTECHLORIDE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum qua'ntitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
CLASSICALS/NU
0^^
kTS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV SE HENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2
Sample 4230SPECIFIED TESTSFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR02S /Media: GROUNDWATER
2000 Project: 00-0256
,SC
Produced by: Thomason, JohnRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/20/2000 13:40Ending:
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE7.9 MG/L CHLORIDE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane .
CLASSICALS/NU TS SAMPLE ANALYSIS ERA-REGION IV S pTHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/
Sample 4231SPECIFIED TESTSFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: RR03S/Media: GROUNDWATER
2000 Project: 00-0256
,SC
Produced by: Thomason, JohnRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/20/2000 14:00Ending:
RESULTS UNITS3.5 MG/L
ANALYTECHLORIDE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given: U-materia! was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: l.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane •
CLASSICALS/N SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV THENS, GA Production Date:
Sample
SPECIFIED TESTSFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR01 1 /Media: GROUNDWATER
2000 Project: 00-0256
, SC
Produced by: Thomason, JohnRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/20/2000 14:10Ending.
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE2.8 MG/L CHLORIDE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: Lwhen no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
CLASS1CALS/NU TS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV S GA Production Date:
Sample 4233SPEC.FIED TESTSFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR04S /Media: GROUNDWATER
2000 Project: 00-0256
, SC
Produced by: Thomason, JohnRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/21/2000 10:40Ending:
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE9.5 MG/L CHLORIDE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence cf material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum qua'ntitalion limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane .
LAWGlBB
February 16, 2001
Ms. Yvonne JonesNorth Superfiind Site ManagementRegion IV, USEPA61 Forsyth StreetAtlanta, GA 30303-3104
Subject: Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent Technologies, Inc., Morristown, New JerseyLAW Project 41-2603-02
Dear Ms. Jones:
Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (LAW) is pleased to submit three copies of theAnnual Ground-Water and Analysis Report on behalf of Lucent Technologies Inc. (Lucent). Weare pleased to report that lead was not detected in any of the well samples.
Should you have any questions or comments concerning the enclosures, please contact CynthiaDraper at (770) 421-3565.
Sincerely,
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
lia E. Draper, P.E, Frederick K. Marotte, P.E.Senior Engineer Principal
cc: Steve Oberkrom
LAW Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.3200 Town Point Drive, NW. Suite 100 • Kennesaw. GA 301'
770-421-3-100
AWGlBB
February 16, 2001
Mr. Steve OberkromEnvironmental Liabilities ManagerLucent Technologies, Inc.777 North Blue ParkwayLees- Summit, MO 64086
Subject: Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent Technologies, Inc., Morristown, New JerseyLAW Project 41-2603-02
Dear Mr. Oberkrom:
Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (LAW) is pleased to provide this report for thesampling and analysis of ground water from the ground-water monitoring wells at the Palmetto RecyclingShe (She) located in Columbia, South Carolina (Figure 1). The ground-water sampling and analysisprocedures were performed in general accordance with the Remedial Action Work Plan (Revised June 2,
1999) to be conducted annually for a five year period following the completion of the RA excavation andremoval activities. This report summarizes the field procedures and the laboratory results of the secondannual sampling event.
Regulatory Status
As required by the Record of Decision (ROD, 1995), surface soils with concentrations above 400 ppmwere excavated from the Site and the area was backfilled (January 1999 through February 1999). A pre-final inspection of the Site by the USEPA and SCDHEC was held in February 1999 and confirmed thatthe RA activities had been completed. The USEPA removed the Site from the National Priority List(NPL) in October 2000.
LAW Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.3200 Town Point Drive, NW. Suite 100 • Kennesaw, GA 30144
770-421-3400
Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site. Columbia. South CarolinaLucent Technologies. Inc..Morristown, New JerseyLAW Project 41-2603-02
February 16. 2001
In accordance with the Remedial Action Plan for future Site monitoring, the ROD required that the
ground water be sampled and analyzed annually for total lead for a five-year period. The first annual
ground-water monitoring event, led by the EPA, was completed in November 1999. Lead concentrations
in all ground-water samples were below the Federal Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for drinking
water. The results of the second annual monitoring event, conducted by Lucent, are provided herein.
Field Procedures
The authorized field work was conducted from October 30, 2000 through November 2, 2000 and included
sampling twelve monitoring wells (MW-1S, I, D, MW-2S, 1, D, MW-3S, I, D, and MW-4S, I, D) foranalysis of total and dissolved lead (EPA Method 6010). The monitoring well locations are provided onFigure 2.
All field equipment was inspected, decontaminated, and calibrated prior to the sampling of each well.Prior to purging of each well, the ground water depth was measured and documented. The wells werethen purged using a low-flow purging technique until three well volumes were removed. After theremoval of three well volumes, the wells were sampled and the liquid analyzed by a certified laboratoryfor dissolved and total lead. Due to slow recharge (0.25 gallon/hour), MW-1I and MW-2I had only one totwo well volumes purged prior to sampling. The purged water was drummed and temporarily stored onSite. The water will be transported to and treated by AMBAC International upon their approval.
Laboratory Results
The laboratory analytical results and sample date are listed in the following table. The laboratory
analytical results reports are attached.
Ground-Water Analytical Results for the Palmetto Recycling Site
Monitoring Well
MW-1SMW-1I
MW-1DMW-2SMW-2I
Date
11/01/0011/02/0010/31/0010/30/0011/02/00
Total Lead(me/I)
NDNDNDNDND
DissolvedLead (me/I)
NDNDNDNDND
Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent Technologies, Inc., Morristown, New JerseyLAW Project 41-2603-02
February 16, 2001
Ground-Water Analytical Results for the Palmetto Recycling Site(Continued)
Well
MW-2DMW-3SMW-3IMW-3D
*MW-13D (DUP)MW-4SMW-4I
*MW-14I (DUP)MW-4D
Rinse Blank IRinse Blank IIRinse Blank III
Date
11/01/0010/31/0010/31/0010/30/0010/30/0010/31/0010/31/0010/31/0011/01/0010/30/0010/31/0011/1/00
Total Lead
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
DissolvedLeadNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
ND = concentrations not detected above the 0.005 mg/L detection limit.*MW-13D is the field duplicate of MW-3D.*MW-14I is the field duplicate of MW-4I.
Lead was not detected in the ground-water samples above the detection limit. These results are consistent
with the results from the previous ground-water sampling events conducted by the USEPA.
Should you have any comments or questions on the ground-water sampling results, please call Cynthia E.
Draper at (770) 421-3565. We appreciate this opportunity to provide continued services to Lucent.
Sincerely,
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Cynthia E. Draper, P.E.Senior Engineer
Attachments
V Frederick K. Marotte, P.E.Principal
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stMnc.com
LOG NO
S E V E R N
SERVICESSTL Savannah
LOG NO: SO-07475Received: 31 OCT 00Reported: 13 NOV 00
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-260302
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 104401113REPORT OF RESULTS Page 1
DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
D7475-1D7475-2D7475-3D7475-4
MW-2SMW-3DMW-13DRinse Blank 1
10-30-00/16:2510-30-00/15:5010-30-00/12:0010-30-00/16:10
PARAMETER 07475-1 07475-2 07475-3 07475-4
'..ead. (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep Date
^Analysis DateFBatch ID
Lead, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
<0.00501
11.01.0011.02.00
1101L
<0.00501
11.01.0011.02.00
1101L
<0.00501
11.01.0011.02.00
1101L
<0.00501
11.01.0011.02.00
1101L
<0.00501
11.01.0011.02.00
1101L
<0.00501
11.01.0011.02.00
1101L
<0.00501
11.01.0011.02.00
1101L
<0.00501
11.01.0011.02.00
1101L
STL Savannah is s part of Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc.
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stHnc.com
,OG NO
S E V E R N
SERVICESSTL Savannah
"~" LOG NO: SO-07475Received: 31 OCT 00Reported: 13 NOV 00
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-260302
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 104401113REPORT OF RESULTS Page 2
DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , QC REPORT FOR LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
7475-5 Method Blank7475-6 Lab Control Standard % Recovery
'ARAMETER 07475-5 07475-6
.ead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis Date
(Jatch ID
jad, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
<0.00501
11.01.0011.02.00
1101L
<0.00501
11.01.0011.02.00
1101L
94 %1
11 .01 .0011.02.00
1101L
94 %1
11.01.0011.02.00
1101L
These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questionsregarding this test report should be directed to the STL Project Managerwho signed this test report.
T)lloria D. Fulwood, Project Manager
Final Page Of Report
STL Savannah is a part of Severn Trent Laboratories. Inc.
S E V E R N
SERV1CES
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stlnnc.com STL Savannah—————————————————————————————————————————————————————— LOG NO: SO-07494
Received: 01 NOV 00Reported: 15 NOV 00
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By. Client
Code: 105401116REPORT OF RESULTS Page 1
DATE/NO SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
37494-137494-237494-337494-437494-5
MW-1DRinse Blank 2MW-14IMW-3SMW-4S
10-31-00/16:0010-31-00/15:3510-31-00/12:0010-31-00/12:0010-31-00/14:00
PARAMETER 07494-1 07494-2 07494-3 07494-4 07494-5
Lead (6010) , mg/1Dilution Factor
kprep Date"Analysis DateBatch ID
Lead, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
<0.00501
11.02.0C11.03.00
1102H
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
STL Savannah is a part p' Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc
S E V E R N
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stl-inc.com
TvRENTSERVICES
STL SavannahLOG NO: SO-07494
Received: 01 NOV 00Reported: 15 NOV 00
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144
-OG NO
REPORT OF RESULTS
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , LIQUID SAMPLES
Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 105401116Page 2
DATE/TIME SAMPLED
J 7 4 9 4 - 6)7494-7
MW-3IMW-4I
10-31-00/15:0010-31-00/16:50
3ARAMETER 07494-6 07494-7
,ead (6010), mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
fead, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
STL Savannah is a part of Seve-n Trent Laboratories, Inc.
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stHnc.com
,OG NO
S E V E R N
SERVICESSTL Savannah
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— LOG NO: SO-07494Received: 01 NOV 00Reported: 15 NOV 00
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 105401116REPORT OF RESULTS Page 3
DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , QC REPORT FOR LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
17494-8 Method Blank17494-9 Lab Control Standard % RecoveryJ7494-10 LCS Accuracy Control Limit (%R)
3ARAMETER
..ead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis Date•3citch ID
jead, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
07494-8
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
<0.00501
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
07494-9
92 %1
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
92 %1
11.02.0011.03.00
1102H
07494-10
75-125 %
75-125 %•
. .'.
These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questionsregarding this test report should be directed to the STL Project Managerwho signed this test report.SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Third Edition,September 1986, and Updates I, II, IIA, IIB, and III.
Gloria D. Fulwood, Project Manager
Final Page Of Report
STL Savannah is a part of Seve.-n Trent l..3bo.ratories, Inc.
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stMnc.com
S E V E R N
SERVICESSTL Savannah
LOG NO: SO-07519Received: 02 NOV 00Reported: 14 NOV 00
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144
,OG NO
REPORT OF RESULTS
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , LIQUID SAMPLES
Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 154601114Page 1
DATE/TIME SAMPLED
7519-17519-27519-37519-4
MW-1SMW-2DMW-4DRinse Blank III
11-01-0011-01-0011-01-0011-01-00
ARAMETER 07519-1 07519-2 07519-3 07519-4
,ead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep Datekvnalysis Date^atch ID
<ead, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
<0.00501
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
<0.00501
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
<0.00501
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
<0.00501
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
<0.00501
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
<0.00501
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
<0.00501
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
<0.00501
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
STL Savannah i? a part of Severn Trent Laborato-ies. Inc.
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stl-inc.com
NO
S E V E R NT R E N T
SERVICESSTL Savannah
—————————————————————————————=——————————————————————— LOG NO: SO-07519Received: 02 NOV 00Reported: 14 NOV 00
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 154601114REPORT OF RESULTS Page 2
DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , QC REPORT FOR LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
J7519-5 Method Blank57519-6 Lab Control Standard % RecoveryD7519-7 LCS Accuracy Control Limit (%R)
?ARAMETER
Lead, Dissolved (6010), mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
07519-5 07519-6
<0.00501
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
100 %1
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
07519-7
^ead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
<0.00501
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
100 %1
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
75-125 %
. . .
75-125
ST1. Savannah is a Dart of Severn Trent Laboratories. Inc.
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah. GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stl-inc.com
,OG NO
S E V E R NT/RENT
SERVICESSTL Savannah
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— LOG NO: SO-07519Received: 02 NOV 00Reported: 14 NOV 00
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 154601114REPORT OF RESULTS Page 3
DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , QC REPORT FOR LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
7519-8 Matrix Spike Result7519-9 Matrix Spike % Recovery7519-10 Matrix Spike Duplicate Result7519-11 Matrix Spike Duplicate % Recovery7519-12 MS Accuracy Advisory Limit (%R)
ARAMETER 07519-8 07519-9 07519-10 07519-11 07519-12
,ead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorLPrep Date'Analysis DateBatch ID
0.4701
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
94 %1
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
0.4741
11.03.0011.06.00
1103G
95 %1
11.03.0011 .06 .00
1103G
75-125 %...------. . .
,ead, Dissolved (6010), mg/1 0.487 97 % 0.494 99 * 75-125 %Dilution Factor 1 l l 1 ---Prep Date 11.03.00 11.03.00 11.03.00 11.03.00Analysis Date 11.06.00 11.06.00 11.06.00 11.06.00 ---Batch ID 1103G 1103G 1103G 1103G
STL Savannah is a oar; of Severn Trent Laboratories, l^c
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stl-mc.com
jOG NO
S E V E R NT i R E N T
SERVICESSTL Savannah
————————————————————————————————————————————————————— LOG NO: SO-07519Received: 02 NOV 00Reported: 14 NOV 00
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 154601114REPORT OF RESULTS Page 4
DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , QC REPORT FOR LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
17519-13 Precision (%RPD) MS/MSD
'ARAMETER
(6010) , %
. Dissolved (6010), %
07519-13
1.1 %
2.0 %
SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Third Edition,September 1986, and Updates I, II, IIA, IIB, and III.
Jloria D. Fulwood, Project Manager
Final Page Of Report
STL Savannah is z part of Sewn Tien! Laboratories. Inc.
S E V E R N/ T R E N T
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stl-inc.com
SERVICESSTL Savannah
LOG NO: SO-07570Received: 03 NOV 00Reported: 15 NOV 00
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144
,OG NO
REPORT OF RESULTS
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , LIQUID SAMPLES
Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 105401116Page 1
DATE/TIME SAMPLED
57570-1 MW1-I17570-2 MW2-I
'ARAMETER
,ead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
"ead, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
1111
07570-1
<0.00501
11.06.0011.08.00
1106L
<0.00501
11.06.0011.08.00
1106L
-02-00-02-00
07570-2
<0.00501
11.06.0011.08.00
1106L
<0.00501
11.06.0011.08.00
1106L
STL Savannah is a part of Sevorn Trent Laboratories. Inc.
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • wvm.stl-inc.com
.OG NO
S E V E R N
SERVICESSTL Savannah
————————————————————————————————————————————————————— LOG NO: SO-07570Received: 03 NOV 00Reported: 15 NOV 00
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 105401116REPORT OF RESULTS Page 2
DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , QC REPORT FOR LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
17570-3 Method Blank17570-4 Lab Control Standard % Recovery17570-5 LCS Accuracy Control Limit (%R)
'ARAMETER
.,ead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DatekBatch ID
.lead, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
07570-3
<0.00501
11.06.0011.07.00
1106L
<0.00501
11.06.0011.07.00
1106L
07570-4
89 %1
11.06.0011.07.00
1106L
89 %1
11.06.0011.07.00
1106L
07570-5
75-125 %
75-125 %
These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questionsregarding this test report should be directed to the STL Project Managerwho signed this test report.SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Third Edition,September 1986, and Updates I, II, IIA, IIB, and III.
Gloria D. Fulwood, Project Manager
Final Page Of Report
STL Savannah is a part of Severn Trent Laboratories. Inc
Jttr
j S CD 2816 Industrial Plaza Drive. Tallahassee, FL 32301 Phone: (850) 878-3994 Fax: (850) 878-9504
• L sab o raa 1 o" U» " ^^^^^^HJj n (t r.nniM S<>v«in Trmt Uitxwatonfts. Inc.
^PROJECT REFERENCE
JSTL (LAB) PROJECT MANAGER I fr~
C:TW>r\ft VuA\AiQDc3kCUENT (SITE) PM ..1 1 L V\v .jOrrtVl^ \ r"'ftCJ«r
CLIENT VAME »
PROJECT NO.
IA \ ~/5(.o cP.O. NUMBER
CLIENT PHONE
C_? 900 Lakeside Drive, Mobile, AL 36693 Phone: (334) 666-6633 Fax: (334) 666-6696
PROJECT LOCATION
~\ri_ C->O (STATE) ^COJ n-O^l ov_CONTRACT NO.
CLIENT FAX
iJJ^H'OO ^-^O^S-l ^4?CLIENT EMAIL
CLIENT ADDRESS
COMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (if applicable)/ '
SAMPLEDATE
U-2.-OC\\-a-or
ij
TIME
>
SAMPLE
/•»s &vJ l (\A- 3>O \HM
IDENTIFICATION
TY\u,\.T«\UO^T-
JRELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)
x?. XL*.,,RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)
^^DATE
RECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY:(SIC"«JURE)
DATE
Ilk loo
MATRIXTYPE
£5
0
sccGtro
CO
MP
OS
ITE
(C
)
AQU
EOU
S (
WAT
ER)
/s
H
_j
LID
OR
SE
MI
°5
D (O
IL. S
OLV
ENT.
ETC
)
O
toDOUJDOZOz
REQUIRED ANALYSES
11
ANUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED
1
f
TIME RELINQU>SHED BY: (SIGNATURE) ^x
C^6lu^/ I/O ]XTIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) ""- — '
ii
DATE
H'eP-ODDATE
TIME
TIME
PAGE OF
STANDARD REPORT _^^DELIVERY C_J
DATE DUE
EXPEDDELIVE(SURCH*
D
TED REPORTRY QvnoE) — '
NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTED PERSHIPMENT:
REMARKS
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)
RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)
LABORATORY USE ONLY
TIME CUSTODY INTACT
gfP YESNO
CUSTODYSEAL NO.
STL-SL LOG NO.
DATE TIME
DATE TIME
LABORATORY REMARKS:
^v^^DMIMML. Y OIO HCVJUCC3 1 MIMU OnMIlM \jr OUO 1 UL» T nCOVTint/ ^(» 5102LaRoche Aven;ie. Savannah. GA 31404 Phone- (912) 354-7858 Fax: (012) 352-0165
CZ5 2846 Industrial Plaz.l Drive. Tallahassee. FL 32301 Phone: (850) 878-399J Fax: (850) 678-9504
Cj 900 Lakeside Drive. Mobile. AL 36G93 Phone: (33J) 656-663.T Fax: (3341 666-6696
PROJECT REFERENCE
\ ft\rr\tf\h) \^e<LJC.Vr\cSTL (LAB) PROJECT MANAGER /+ d
r \ • ! _ ; . 1T"\or. ft i \>L\i,iV»jr>e''CLIENT (SITE) PM
T^ EVvr.rJL.Ul
PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION
Li\ — O/ V-xTk *- f O-C^L (STATE) ^V"*
P.O. NUMBER CONTRACT NO.
CLIENT PHONE CLIENT FAX
"^"lo Ui3ii 3 HOO ~)TO 4^i\ SH^GJCLIENT EMAIL
CLIENT ADDRESS
»3A(5 o 1 OLor\ \s\rxr l-^f r^J i y>J. jLi }~\T£ \ooCOMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (il applicable):
SAMPLEDATE
U-l\ v - \\ v - \\M\V-1\H
TIME
jjors!
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
rv\u-i-i<=)mtJ-J}^KMJ-4C^
\V\U3- 2\^> rpc5K\VO- Oh 51',rN<;c. fcWVtTf
"^-tof i xjr^>rcs/-c\;i>d ^f»^>l/-s> '.
\N\tncA-i p*-W»Avj lAorNp. Exrr\)jc\\ N
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) —————
RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)
MATRIXTYPE
LtJ
OCQ
CEOLtO
0
CO
MP
OS
ITE
AQ
UE
OU
S (
WA
TER
)
gOin
SO
LID
OR
SE
MI
D (O
IL.
SOLV
ENT,
ET
C)
NO
NAQ
UEO
US
LIQ
UI
REQUIRED ANALYSES
3
0O_9
^J
&
1
I
1 1 1NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED
1
f
f
\
\
\
PATL> • / TIME^ — RELINQUISHED' BY: >STSNATURE) r — •1 i \t ' \C ^/(AJS-^_ j Ju^^ ^\
DATE TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)
1
1
1
\
1
\
DATE
;\\-\*ATE
TIME
TIME '
PAGE . °lSTANDARD REPORT —^DELIVERY CJ
DATE DUE
EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY(SURCHARGE)
DATE DUE
O
NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTED PERSHIPMENT.
REMARKS
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE
RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE
LABORATORY USE ONLYRECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY:(SIGNATURE)
L/ /)f~N Urv-"*<^
DATE TIME CUSTODY INTACT
uiz.) o ^V& YES• NO
CUSTODYSEAL NO.
STL-SL LOG NO.
TIME
TIME
LABORATORY REMARKS:
ORI
GIN
AL
,\J^^r
RPsBiE vi-niig.au*~= ^=
^^^^T""" j'
AINALYUIS) ritZUUCa AINU UI-IAIN Uf UUSIUUT Ht^UTTCT qg) 5102 LnRoche Avenue, Savannan, UA JM04 Hnone- isi^i a3J-/n:«i raT^u, li^-uiba
CD 2846 Industrial Plaza Drive. Tallahassee, FL 32301 Phone: (850) 878-3994 Fax: (850) 878-9504
C~) 900 Lakeside Drive. Mobile. AL 36693 Phone: (334) 666-6633 Fa«. (334) 666-6696
PROJECT REFERENCE
r'PAcneun *^fl ^c.\.r>vSTL (LAB) PROJECT MANAGER (^ (J
CLIENT (SITE) PM
CLIENT ME
PROJECT NO.
P.O. NUMBER
CLIENT PHONE
7"7o|l2.l-2>t-iOO
PROJECT LOCATION(STATE) .<•£»
CONTRACT NO.
CLIENT FAX
CLIENT EMAIL
CLIENT ADDRESS
cj£lOO I Oi f-% Tt>\Pu IXs X.<=/W 5>FiLv3 , CJ PJ oD\HM•COMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (il applicable):
g SAMPLEj DATE
|r»)3l JOO
l# /3 \I601031/00
:'
...
TIME
\k :oo^\3^IZM
IJXT&:
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
pr\lO- \t>
/Auu- HZ
T^r i^ptr^fv*^ ^K-i^-
V^^^^^\^^ ^Pr-c&r^Ur-*" ^ \ I
7 i • i
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)
y 1//£• ' // /&?~1»/4SI
RECEIVED BY: SIGNATURE)
DATE TIME
DATE TIME
MATRIXTYPE
CO
MPO
SITE
(C
) O
R G
RA
B (G
) IN
DICA
TE
AQ
UE
OU
S (
WA
TER
)
XK
SO
LID
OR
SE
MIS
OLI
D
NO
NA
OU
EO
US
LIQ
UID
(OIL
. S
OLV
EN
T, E
TC)
REQUIRED ANALYSES
I
m
<
1
\•
NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED
1
1
RELINQUISHED BY: •^IG!ATURE) .
DECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) Qfi
\
\
t
D/nE ,
DATE
TIME
17: 35TIME
•••
PAGE \ °'\STANDARD REPORT __DELIVERY (_}
DATE DUE
EXPEDDELIVE(SURCH
D
TED REPORTRY Q^PGE) ^-s
NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTED PERSHIPMENT:
REMARKS
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)
RECEIVED BY: (SGNATURE)
LABORATORY USE ONLYRECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY: DATE? / TIME CUSTODY INTACT
^>NO
CUSTODYSEAL NO.
STL-SL LOG NO.
DATE TIME
DATE TIME
LABORATORY REMARKS:
<f
OR
IGIN
AL
L-t ^D
CD 2846 Industrial Plaza Drive, Tallahassee. FL 32301 Phone: (850) 878-399-1 Fax- (850) 878-9504
IRil O 900 Lakosid" Drive. Mobile, AL 36693 Phone:(334)666-6633 Fax:(334)666-6696
A rtr^tnn nl Sr>wern [rftnt l..il>OMlnri«c. hr..
PJSQJECT REFERENCK \ L( CX-A^-t-Q jp "O TvuGucJii fl
STL (LAB) PROJECT MANAGER \ \
CLIENT (SITEI PM .
CLIENT^1|\ME
LAv)CLIENT ADDRESS
^- \^>Cc^<i-S
PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION
yl~3&o3'0^ (STATE) <^d.P.D. NUMBER CONTRACT NO.
CLIENT PHONE CLIENT FAX
CLIENT EMAIL
*« fi»*tJ Dr. knr«^cu^ £A zowyCOMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (if applicable): ' / S
SAMPLEDATE
(O/ 2//0O(ohlfaoIt /SI/DO
(*h(foo
TIME
!1\OO]U\OO
\f:oo'16 : toJUoTF ',
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
/Aw - J> $/A U3 - Ll <>M w - S A\ w - V-^
7=br Ltnpft-s^rJfcdl dArv^lr^ -T^r^sr T?'Hey\ -V- T>rrs<^fGe)nvr\<rci^feL/ LL,(£ri€r rVr-r-ipt———————— / -4 —— —— — L_
*RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)
RECEIVED B1/ (SIGNATURE)
MATRIXTYPE
CO
MP
OS
ITE
(C
) O
R G
RA
B (
G)
INDI
CATE
AQU
EOU
S (
WAT
ER)
K3hkxiiS
OLI
D O
R S
EM
ISO
LIC D
(CIL
, S
OLV
EN
T,
ET
C)
NO
NA
OU
EO
US
LIQ
UI
REQUIRED ANALYSES
1*^f^
^^^^
C5\ tJ
' ^^ ,NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED
1
I
i
1
DATE, . TIME RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATUHW r ~^/ Q/-t ' / J * — 1 ^s.
DATE/ TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)
/1I1
DATE
DATE
TIME
TIME '
;.
,
« 0, ;
STANDARD REPORT _^DELIVERY C_)
DATE DUE
EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY f-~\(SUnCHAPGE) —
NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTED PERSHIPMENT:
REMARKS
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME
X)RtCEIVEDBY:(SGNATURE) DATE TIME
LABORATORY USE ONLYRECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY:(SIGNATURE)^? S
'^t/^^' ———
DATE' i TIME CUSTODY INTACT
/ ' NO
CUSTODYSEAL NO.
STL-SL LOG NO. LABORATORY REMARKS:
OR
IGIN
AL
r\.^^^r
J S§ ~ O 2846 Industrial Plaza Drive. Tallahassce. FL 32301 Phone:(850)878-3994 Fax:(850)878-9504
rt t£&L&jftjJb9CIu|.U ^— ^ 900 Lakeside D'ive. Mobile. AL 36693 Phon»- (334) 666-6633 Fax: (334) 6(56-6696
f« ^0 .*«,„ .C
^PROJECT REFERENCE -_ ' ,
3STL (LAB) PROJECT MANAGER fx J
fSvSfiCc. l^rcUKLS
I L~~T\VJ J£A-V 'i fcH^jf-^-^cqe^
PROJECT NO.
P.6. NUMBER
CLIENT RHONE
PROJECT LOCATION(STATE) / /*
CONTRACT NO.
CLIENT FAX
CLIENT EMAIL
CLIENT ADDRESS «
.T300 7^* /*^ -2V Kw.«je.<xt.tus GA W/V^COMPANY CONTRACTINI/THIS WORK (il applicable): ' /i
S SAMPLE? DATE
^\Dl&looj/2)/!)6/OO
J/0/W°^
P/3J/PO
i}j
TIME
\B ',^616 '.50& • oo\(, ',\0
< h
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
/AiJ-^L-5AAu;- ?>bMu/- libA TM kr 1
^c1, fv v*pf*.stsrtJL dfisJlvzJL-' 7,/^s^ -fil-t«_r cwvj_ p/i»'
/;fe)A/ ftZ&^z-PT'f In*!•^= - " ——— ; ————— -^ /^
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)
.0 si/
RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)
DATE TIME
DATE TIME
MATRIXTYPE
CO
MP
OS
ITE
(C
) O
R G
RA
B (
G)
INDI
CATE
/sf
^
AQ
UE
OU
S (
WA
TER
)
IXXXPC
<3
/
1-
SO
LID
OR
SE
MIS
OLI
Dav
d
eN
ON
AQ
UE
OU
S L
.QU
ID (
OIL
. S
OLV
EN
T. E
TC)
f^v
TiXVM.\
REQUIRED ANALYSES
^
0
1
£>o 1
0
t iNUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED
I
|
1
1
•* S»
W
RELINQUISHED BtY^eiGNATUREl /] .
ffltCEIVED BY: (siGNATiM^
i
1
|
|
"V j)4«j
r M£K
*— n
DATE
DATE
-r/J-dea£i
TIME
I7-/5"TIME
41
PAGE
STANDDELIVE
D
EXPEDDELIVE(SURCH
D
OF1 /ARO REPORT _-RY Cj
ATE DUE ______ .. ___ .
TED REPORTRY Q4RGE) ^— '
NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTED PERSHIPMENT:
REMARKS
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)
RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)
LABORATORY USE ONLY
RECEIVED FOR LABORATORY B#: DATE/ TIME CUSTODY INTACT
<E5>TJO
CUSTODYSEAL NO.
STL-SL LOG NO.
5%) 9 *?5
DATE TIME
DATE TIME
LABORATORY REMARKS:
.
OR
IGIN
AL
LAWGlBB 1 FILE COPY4652 4466 1284February 5, 2002
Ms. Yvonne JonesNorth Superfund Site ManagementRegion IV, USEPA61 Forsyth StreetAtlanta, GA 30303-3104
Subject: Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent Technologies, Inc.LAW Project 41-2603-02
Dear Ms. Jones:
Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (LAW) is pleased to provide the enclosed report for
the sampling and analysis of ground water from the ground-water monitoring wells at the Palmetto
Recycling Site (Site) located in Columbia, South Carolina. The ground-water sampling and analysis
procedures were performed in general accordance with the Remedial Action Work Plan (Revised June 2,
1999). The ground-water sampling is to be conducted annually for a five-year period following the
completion of the RA excavation and removal activities in 1999. This report summarizes the field
procedures and the laboratory results of the third annual sampling event.
The results of the third annual sampling event are provided in the enclosed report and show that lead was
not detected in any of the ground-water samples. The analytical results for lead for this sampling eventand the previous events indicate that the lead concentrations in the groundwater samples are below
drinking water standards.
Should you have any comments or questions on the ground-water sampling results, please call Cynthia E.Draper at (770) 421-3565 or Joe Chikowski at (732) 793-3531.
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
„.Cyjlthia E. Draper, ?',.E. Frederick K. Marotte, P.ESejnior Engineer " Principal
Attachmentscc: Joe Chikowski
i_AW Engineering an:.' Envnoniiic-niai Se; vices. Inc.3200 Town Point l>ive NW Suite 100 • Kenr.oia-.v. GA 30'-)J
77Q-.1?;-3-100 • - a x - 770 421-3^36
LAWGlBB
February 4, 2002
4652 4466 1295Mr. Joe Chikowski25 East Pelican WayOcean Beach, Unit IIILavallette, NJ 08735
Subject: Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia,Soitth CarolinaLucent TechnologiesLAW Project No.: 41-2603-02
Dear Mr. Chikowski:
Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (LAW) is pleased to provide this report for the
sampling and analysis of ground water from the ground-water monitoring wells at the Palmetto Recycling
Site (Site) located in Columbia, South Carolina (Figure 1). The ground-water sampling and analysis
procedures were performed in general accordance with the Remedial Action Work Plan (Revised June 2,
1999). The ground-water sampling is to be conducted annually for a five-year period following the
completion of the RA excavation and removal activities in 1999. This report summarizes the field
procedures and the laboratory results of the third annual sampling event.
Regulatory Status
As required by the Record of Decision (ROD, 1995), surface soils with concentrations above 400 ppmwere excavated from the Site and the area was backfilled (January 1999 through February 1999). A pre-fmal inspection of the Site by the USEPA and SCDHEC was held in February 1999 and confirmed that
the RA activities had been completed. The USEPA removed the Site from the National Priority List(NPL) in October 2000.
LAW Engiriefti'ir.g and Erv:,-cn:v;<T-.;2: Services. Inc.3200 Town Poirv; Drive NW S..M-C- 100 - Kenncs.T.v. C»A 301-14
770-4^1 -3-JOO • r;v<- 770-421-3486
Annual Ground- Water Sampling and Analysis Report February- 4. 2002Palmetto Recycling Site, Columbia. South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesLA W Project 41-2603-02Page 2 of 4
In accordance with the Remedial Action Plan for future Site monitoring, the ROD required that the
ground water be sampled and analyzed annually for total lead for a five-year period. The first annualground-water monitoring event, led by the EPA, was completed in November 1999 and the second annual
ground-water monitoring event, led by Lucent, was completed in October 2000. Lead concentrations in
all ground-water samples for both sampling events were below the Federal Maximum Contaminant Level
(MCL) for drinking water. The results of the third annual monitoring event, conducted by Lucent, are
provided herein.
Field Procedures
The fieldwork was conducted from December 3, 2001 through December 5, 2001 and included sampling
eleven monitoring wells (MW-1S, I, D, MW-2S, D, MW-3S, I, D, and MW-4S, I, D) for analysis of total
and dissolved lead (EPA Method 6010). Due to slow recharge at MW-2I and an appearance of a high
level of turbidity, approval was obtained from Yvonne Jones of the USEPA to return on the following
week with a different pump, capable of a greater lift, to obtain a sample from MW-2I. Yvonne Jones of
the USEPA reported that she informed Jim Bowman of the SCDHEC of the field adjustment. The
monitoring well locations are provided on Figure 2.
All field equipment was inspected, decontaminated, and calibrated prior to the sampling of each well.Prior to purging of each well, the ground-water depth was measured and documented. All wells except
MW-2I were then purged using a low-flow purging technique using a peristaltic pump unt i l three wellvolumes were removed. After the removal of three well volumes, the wells were sampled and the liquid
analyzed by a certified laboratory for dissolved and total lead. Due to slow recharge (0.25 gallon/4 hour)at MW-2I, the well was purged dry using a Teflon bailer, on December 5, 2001. After the well wasallowed to recharge, a sample was collected and sent to the laboratory. Yvonne Jones of the USEPA wasnotified of the appearance of high turbidity in this sample and the laboratory was notified to put the
sample analysis on hold. At this time, verbal approval was obtained from Yvonne Jones at the USEPA toreturn to the site the following week with more suitable sampling equipment. On Monday December 10,2001 MW-2I was purged dry using a Grundfos Redi-Flo3 Submersible Pump. The well was then allowedto recharge to approximately its original water level and the sample was collected on Tuesday, December
11, 2001. The sample collected from MW-2I on December 11, 2001, contained less turbidity then thanthe previous sample sent to the laboratory for analysis. The December 5, 2001 sample for MW-2I was
Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis Report February 4. 2002Palmetto Recycling Site. Columbia, South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesLAW Project 41-2603-02Page 3 of 4
not analyzed and discarded appropriately. This procedure was verbally approved by Yvonne Jones of the
USEPA and communicated to the SCDHEC The December 11 .sample for MW-2I was analyzed for lead.
Laboratory Results
The laboratory analytical results and sample date are listed in the following table and the laboratoryanalytical result reports are attached.
Ground-Water Analytical Results for the Palmetto Recycling Site
Monitoring Well
MW-1SMW-1IMW-1DMW-2SMW-2IMW-2D
MW-12D*MW-3SMW-3I
MW-13I*MW-3DMW-4SMW-4IMW-4D
Rinse Blank
Sample Date
12/04/0!12/04/0112/04/0112/04/0112/11/0112/04/0112/04/0112/04/0112/05/0112/05/0112/05/0112/05/0112/05/0112/05/0112/05/01
Total Lead(mg/1)
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
DissolvedLead (mg/1)
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
ND = concentrations not detected above the 0.005 mg/L detection limit.*MW-12D is the field duplicate of MW-2D.*MW-13I is the field duplicate of MW-3I.
Lead was not detected in the ground-water samples above the detection limit. These results are consistentwith the results from the previous ground-water sampling events conducted by the USEPA and Lucent.
Annual Ground- Water Sampling and A nalysis Report February 4. 2002Palmetto Recycling Site, Columbia. South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesLAW Project 4 1-2603-02Page 4 of 4
Should you have any comments or questions on the ground^KSter sampling results, please call Cynthia E.
Draper at (770) 421-3565. We appreciate this opportunity to provide continued services to Lucent.
Sincerely,
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
dthia E. Draper, Pj. Frederick K. Marorte, P.E.
enior Engineer Principal
Attachments
ATTACHMENTS
G:\att\polmetto\remd\rev\sitemap.dwg 4/20/99 8:39 am
COLUMBIAHIGHLAND COUNTY
PALMETTORECYCLING
SOURCE: RIAS REPORT. COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORP.. NOVEMBER 1994
REMEDIAL ACTIONPALMETTO RECYCLING SITE
RICHLAND COUNTY,SOUTH CAROLINA
LAWENQNCCR1NG AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
SITE LOCATION MAP
JOB NO. 41-2603-02 FIGURE 1
S E V E R N
5102 URoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stWnc.com
SERVICES
STL Savannah
NO
LOG NO: SI-18062Received: 12 DEC 01Reported: 20 DEC 01
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 152011220Page l
DATE/TIME SAMPLED
REPORT OF RESULTS
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , LIQUID SAMPLES
62-1 MW2I
AMETER
12-11-01/11:20
18062-1
.d (6010) , mg/1lution Factor•ep Datelalysis Dateitch ID
, (Dissolved) (6010) , mg/1"lution Factorrep Datenalysis Dateatch ID
cO.00501
12.13.0112.15.01
12131
<0.00501
12.13.0112.15.01
1213H
STL Savannah is a part of Severn Trent Laboratories. Inc
S E V E R NT R E N T
SERVICES
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah. GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.sttnnc.com STL Savannah
NO
LOG NO: SI-18062Received: 12 DEC 01Reported: 20 DEC 01
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 152011220REPORT OF RESULTS Page 2
—— DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , QC- REPORT FOR LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
2-2 Method Blank2-3 Lab Control Standard % Recovery2-4 LCS Accuracy Control Limit (%R)
METER
1 (6010) , mg/1.ution Factor:p Dateklysis Datefch ID
3, (Dissolved) (6010), mg/1lution Factor2p Datealysis Datetch ID
18062-2
<0.00501
12.13.0112.15.01
12131
<0.00501
12.13.0112.15.01
1213H
18062-3
103 %1
12.13.0112.15.01
12131
106 %1
12.13.0112.15.01
1213H
18062-4
75-125 %...
...
75-125 %
...- - -- - -
These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questionsregarding this test report should be directed to the STL Project Managerwho signed this test report.
jria D. Fulwood, Project Manager
Final Page Of Report
or?.!nr:«5. !nr
mg>J£giJL | f " " ^^ Jiu<: Ldrtuuie avenue rnune. \?iiLt OJH-/OJO i ^
• -T-R-1i-NT- •
IQQQH STL SavannahPROJECT REFERENCE
STLJLAB) PROJECT MANAGERCl4 OC^O^ TV ) 3OrfrSr-\
CUENT (SITE) P.M .
C_AA f^AV\yi Q_ wt TvO -er\CLIENlJRAME *
PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATIONHi3U,0?50P (STATE)P.O. NUMBER CONTRACT NO.
CLIENT PHONE CUENT FAX
CLIENT E-MAIL
CLIENT ADDRESS tt\ V ^ Slf"/
COMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (if applicable)
SAMPLE
>
•"t^T^RTfVl
TIME
\vo-o-H=95?5
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
IY^J^J^. _"Rn^ - 3^
ARELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)
RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)
DATE TIME RELINQUISHED BY: (SlG>*
odvaiuidii, un oitu«» rax: jai^j OD/JHJIDO
C_^ Alternate Laboratory Name/ LocationPhone:Fax:
MATRIXTYPE
OR G
RAB
(G)
INDI
CATE
COM
POSI
TE (C
AQUE
OUS
(WAT
ERSO
LID O
R SE
MIS
OLID
rr
NONA
QUEO
US L
IQUI
D (O
IL S
OLVE
NT, .
..)
AJUREX
^^
REQUIRED ANALYSIS
•J
$
i
*j/O
gw
i'
r" s'i ESEf?¥\ V s"VT IV!a
NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED
^
^
DATE TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)
(/t^F^"*~> —
DATE
DATE
S)i — — —^
TIME
TIME
PAGE OF
STANDARD REPORTDELIVERY (^)
DATE DUE
EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY Q(SURCHARGE)
DATE DUE
NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMIHEDPER SHIPMENT:
REMARKS
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME
RECEIVED BY. (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME
;.;K£... • LABORATORY USE ONLYRECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY:(SIGNATURE!
K/ <2 — *£L~ — -
DATE . -TIME CUSTOD/ INTACT. ''^ YES <C3""~' ——— '
c-sUSTODYEALNO.
STL SAVANNAHLOG NO.
LABORATORY REMARKS ...
ORIGINAL - RETURN TO LABORATORY WITH SAMPLE(S)
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah. GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stMnc.com
NO
S E V E R NT R E N T
SERVICES
STL Savannah
LOG NO: SI- 17845Received: 05 DEC 01
_ __________ Reported: 13 DEC 01Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 095211213REPORT OF RESULTS Page 1
DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
15-115-215-315-415-5
MW1IMW2DMW12DMW2SMW1S
12.12121212
-04-01/08:20-04-01/11:00-04-01/12:00-04-01/16:20-04-01/14:50
AMETER 17845-1 17845-2 17845-3 17845-4 17845-5
d (6010) , mg/1^ution FactorBp Dateralysis Dateitch ID
<
1212
0.00501
.06.01
.10.011206K
<
1212
0.00501
.06.01
.10.011206K
<
1212
0.00501
.06.01
.10.011206K
<
1212
0.00501
.06.01
.10.011206K
<
1212
0 .00501
-06.01- 10.011206K
id, (Dissolved).lution Factor:ep Datelalysis Dateitch ID
(6010), mg/1 <0.00501
12.07.0112.11.01
1207G
<0.00501
12.07.0112.11.01
1207G
<0.00501
12.07.0112.11.01
1207G
<0.00501
12.07.0112.11.01
1207G
<0 .00501-
12.07.0112.11.01
1207G
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 364 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stHnc.com
S E V E R NT R E N T
SERVICES
STL Savannah
NO
LOG NO: SI-17845Received: 05 DEC 01Reported: 13 DEC 01
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 095211213Page 2
DATE/TIME^SAMPLED
REPORT OF RESULTS
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION / LIQUID'SAMPLES
45-6 MW1D45-7 MW3S
12-04-01/13:1012-04-01/16:30
AMETER 17845-6 17845-7
d (6010) , mg/1lution Factorep Date.alysis DateJtch ID
Jd, (Dissolved) (6010) , mg/1.lution Factorrep Datelalysis Dateitch ID
<0 .00501
12.06.0112.10.01
1206K
< 0 . 0 0 5 01
12.07.0112.11.01
1207G
<0 .00501
12.06.0112.10.01
1206K
<0 .00501
12.07.0112.11.01
1207G
STL Savannah is a nnr! n' Swm T--."-t Inho.'riiOnes. lie
S E V E R NT R E N T
SERVICES
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.sttnnc.com STL Savannah
LOG NO: SI-17845Received: 05 DEC 01Reported: 13 DEC 01
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 095211213REPORT OF RESULTS Page 3
DATE/NO SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , .QC-REPORT FOR LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
.45-8 Method Blank45-9 Lab Control Standard % Recovery45-10 LCS Accuracy Control Limit (%R)
LAMETER
id (6010) , mg/1.lution Factor:ep Datelalysis Date
^:ch ID
id, (Dissolved) (6010) , mg/1Llution Factorrep Datelalysis Dateitch ID
17845-8
< 0 . 0 0 5 01
12.06.0112.09.01
1206K
<0 .00501
12.07.0112.11.01
1207G
17845-9
110 %1
12.06.0112.09 .01
1206K
104 %1
12.07.0112.11.01
1207G
17845-10
75-125 %
- - -
75-125 *
- - -
These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questionsregarding this test report should be directed to the STL Project Managerwho signed this test report.
D. Fulwood, Project Manager
Final Page Of Report
STL Savannah is a part oi Severn Trent Laboratories. Inc
^ •••( •••••• H ^i^r Diu^ LdnuLiie nvL-nue riiuni.-. \~Ji^i jj-<-/ujo ^^^^
• T R E N T ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^H•QgtfZ^H STL Savannah
PROJECT REFERENCE
STULAB) PROJECT MANAGER (j
CLIENT (SITE) PM
CLIENT NAME
Z-/1IA/
PROJECT NO.
Hl-{U*{& -D^LP.O. NUMBER
CLIENT PHONE ._
PROJECT LOCATION(STATE) ^(^
CONTRACT NO.
CLIENT FAX
CLIENT E-MAIL
CLIENT ADDRESS, ^Ccjfcc /OO /,a£.OQ ) 0«->rx /UYI,/V'/% /jf l4t*s\f)~if\iAj Lrfl <^(^lf-ft-fCOMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (if applicable)
SAMPLEt^TE
/^/Worjai^la;Ja./H/ftjlAltf/o'
TIME
(T^AO/looUODIt^-o
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
mco/TAv w ^l f^MVS/ labfAt; £3
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)
RECEIVED BY (SIGNATURE)
DATE
DATE
RECEIVEDFDR LABORATORY M: / /I '„ DATE
/•TIME
TIME
<•._ .> Alternate Laboratory Name/LocationPhone:Fax:
MATRIXTYPE
&Si3CD
§oo:O0UJ
1U
&UJ
CODOUJ
1
KK•y
Q_tO
UJ
orOQ
8 tr
£UJ
i05
s2
REQUIRED ANALYSIS
I1N,
0
|
\1
*>
*,
4
•
i•
_ . 1•
NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED
KKKt*
RELINQUISHED B\ (SIGNATUREh,
RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)
K
KK^
DATE
\i\t4o\DATE
TIME
^'}'\7C^
TIME
PAGE OF
STANDARD REPORTDELIVERY (^)
DATE DUE
EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY (^'j,(SURCHARGE)
DATE DUE
NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTEDPER SHIPMENT:
REMARKS
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME
1RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME
LABORATORY USE ONLY
TIME CUSTODY INTAprYES C(X^
CUSTODYSEAL NO.
STL SAVANNAHLOG NO.
fl T7FK
LABORATOPf REMARKS
^ /
ORIGINAL - RETURN TO LABORATORY WFTH SAMPLE(S)
Savannah, GA 31404
STL SavannahFax: (912) 352-0165
CD Alternate Laboratory Name/LocationPhone:Fax:
PRUIECT REFERENCE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION(STATE) ££
MATRIXTYPE REQUIRED ANALYSIS
PAGE OF
STL (LAB) PROJECT MAffAGER P.O. NUMBER CONTRACT NO.
CCltNT (SITE) PM CLIENT PHONE CLIENT FAX
CLIENT NAME3*1 on
CLIENT E-MAIL
CLIENT ADDRESS
J2,«Stccfcc/t)Q
COMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (il applicable)
SAMPLEDATE TIME
PO
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AQ SO
PnNUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED
STANDARD REPORTDELIVERY
DATE DUE
EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY(SURCHARGE)
DATE DUE
NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTEDPER SHIPMENT:
REMARKS
ervef<rr
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME R E L I N Q I S H E D BY: DATE TIME RELINQUISHED BY. (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME
RECEIVED BY (SIGNATURE). . . . . . . . . . ... ,.-; .,.,..,.
DATE TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME
LABORATORY USE ONLYDATE TIME CUST•ODYlJjrtCT CUSTODY
SEAL NO.STL SAVANNAHLOG NO.
LABORATORY REMARKS
ORIGINAL - RETURN TO LABORATORY WFTH SAMPLE(S)
S E V E R NT R E N T
SERVICES
5102 LaRoche Avenue » Savannah. GA 314Q4 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fan: 912 352 0165 ' wvw.stMnc.com______ STL Savannah
LOG NO: SI-17912Received: 06 DEC 01Reported: 14 DEC 01
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02
«=\t»wBnMi£rr sProject: Palmetto Recycling
Sampled By: ClientCode: 154411214
Page 1DATE/TIME SAMPLEDNO
REPORT OF RESULTS
SAMPLE DESCR-IPTION , LIQUID SAMPLES
2-12-2.2-3.2-4.2-5
MW-4SMW-4IMW-4DEquipment BlankMW-3D
12-05-01/08:1012-05-01/11:2012-05-01/15:3012-05-01/13:0012-05-01/14:00
METER 17912-1 17912-2 17912-3 17912-4 17912-5
1 (6010), mg/1fcution FactorUp Datealysis Datetch ID
<0.00501
12.07.0112.10.01
1207H
<0.00501
12.07.0112.10.01
1207H
<0.00501
12.07.0112.10.01
1207H
<0.00501
12.07.0112 . 10 .01
1207H
<0.00501
12.07.0112.10.01
1207H
d, (Dissolved) (6010), mg/1 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050lution Factor 1 1 1 1. 1ep Date 12.07.01 12.07.01 12.07.01 12.07.01 12.07.01alysis Date 12.11.01 12.11.01 12.11.01 12.11.01 12.11.01tch ID 1207K 1207K 1207K 1207K 1207K
S E V E R N
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stlnnc.com
T R E N TSERVICES
STL Savannah
NO
LOG NO: SI-17912Received: 06 DEC 01Reported: 14 DEC 01
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 154411214Page 2
DATE/TIME SAMPLED
REPORT OF RESULTS
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , LIQUJD SAMPLES
12-612-7
MW-3IMW-13I
12-05-01/10:1012-05-01/10:10
AMETER 17912-6 17912-7
d (6010), mg/1lution Factorep Datealysis Datefcch ID
<0.00501
12.07.0112.10.01
1207H
<0.00501
12.07.0112.10.01
1207H
.d, (Dissolved)
.lution Factor:ep Datelalysis Dateitch ID
(6010), mg/1 <0.00501
12.07.0112.11.01
1207K
<0.00501
12.07.0112.11.01
1207K
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah. GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stMnc.com
; NO
S E V E R NT R E N T
SERVICES
STL SavannahLOG NO: SI-17912
Received: 06 DEC 01Reported: 14 DEC 01
KB. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 154411214REPORT OF RESULTS Page 3
DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , QC REPORT FOR LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
H2-9 Method Blank*12-10 Lab Control Standard * RecoveryJ12-11 LCS Accuracy Control Limit (%R)
IAMETER 17912-9 17912-10 17912-11
id (6010) , mg/1Llution Factorrep Datetoalysis DateItch ID
ad, (Dissolved) (6010) , mg/1ilution Factorrep Datenalysis Dateatch ID
<0
12.12.
<0
12.12.
.00501
07.0110.011207H
.00501
07.0111.011207K
105 %1
12.07.0112.10.01
1207H
104 %1
12.07.0112.11.01
1207K
75-125 %
...
75-125 %.........- - -
These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questionsregarding this test report should be directed to the STL Project Managerwho signed this test report.
oria D. Fulwood, Project Manager
Final Page Of Report
T R E N TSERVICES STL Savannah
•102 LaRoche AvenueSavannah, GA 31404
Phone: (912) 354-7858Fax: (912) 352-0165
ORIGINAL - RETURN TO LABORATORY WITH SAMPLE(S)
mtJMLSblflHP " [^^ S1U^ La«ocne Avenue Hhone: (yiii) 3b4-/Bba ^^• T I? P M T ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ iHKittWiiliaMEtUii H^MH^Hl ^ ^UL]lU£]l££&S^
I ^ ^H STL SavannahPROJECT REFERENCE
STL (LAB) PROJECT MANAGER 1 C
CT\ ot \ cx, T~Y/sA (j cv^-JCLIENT (SITE) PM
CLIENT N/lwE »
PROJECT NO.
i HI~^l(«O3-O 2lr P.O. NUMBER
CLIENT PHONE
PROJECT LOCATION(STATE) *£(^
CONTRACT NO.
CLIENT FAX
CLIENT E-MAIL
CLOT ADDRESS ^ Jlol^1-!
COMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (if applicable)
SAMPLEDATE
M/5^y\
*
TIME
if 00\0(0io\o\12>O
• .
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
^\i^~30AXc-u - 3~E-r^uo-i^x^\^0 - i^H "^L .
\Si<f^s\l>>-ir^ ,-yxH ^rt^\T"P5/ < "/v^ / JL -i "" Vi—^c-
/ ^
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)
RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)
DATE TIME
DATE TIME
CI5 Alternate Laboratory Name/LocationPhone:Fax:
MATRIXTYPE
OR G
RAB
(G) t
GoiC
ATt
COM
POSI
TE (C
a:UJ
AQUE
OUS
(WA1
tt
^
^
? /
0
8
SOLID
OR
SEM
P
t i VLIQ
UID
(O
IL S
OLVE
NT, .
..)NO
NAQU
EOUS
\
REQUIRED ANALYSIS— '
1
4of-
V
g|
IiJ1^ H.^ 9-,*hf:& {\hWMh
NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMInED
X
A'A *
v\CA
/^TfJJt^^CJr^ /J/'RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) "~~"
X^Xw^H?
[——
^kc^(.{MA
l^kDATE
sJrrir:V
^ '
TIME
TIME
^•^nff
,
» -p if »]
^LViA>c
PAGE OF
STANDARD REPORTDELIVERY ^^
DATE DUE
EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY C~)(SURCHARGq ^~^
DATE DUE
NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTEDPER SHIPMENT:
REMARKS
for 0:->-s*\«** Le* |;
IX
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME
RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME
,'K- :•.-• • LABORATORY USE ONLY
RECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY'(SIGNATURE/ / // J
^A**#4fa6rDATE/ . ;-t1ME
(f%/;l 5"
CUSTODY INTACT
NO O
CUSTODYSEAL NO.
STL SAVANNAHLOG NO.
57199/2LABORATORY REMARKS
s
// ORIGINAL - RETURN TO LABORATORY WfTH SAMPLE(S)
MACTECDecember 2, 2002
Ms. Yvonne JonesNorth Superfund Site ManagementRegion IV, USEPA61 Forsyth StreetAtlanta, GA 30303-3104
Subject: 2002 Annual Groundwater Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent Technologies, Inc.MACTEC Project 41-2603-02
Dear Ms. Jones:
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. is pleased to provide the enclosed report for the sampling andanalysis of groundwater from the groundwater monitoring wells at the Palmetto Recycling Site (Site) inColumbia, South Carolina. The groundwater sampling and analysis procedures were performed ingeneral accordance with the Remedial Action Work Plan (Revised June 2, 1999) and the "2002 AnnualGroundwater Sampling Event" letter issued by the USEPA in September 2002, allowing for a reductionof sampling locations (Attachment A). Groundwater sampling will be conducted annually for a five-yearperiod following the completion of the remedial action excavation and removal activities in 1999. Thisreport summarizes the field procedures and the laboratory results of the Fourth Annual Sampling Event.
The results of the Fourth Annual Sampling Event are provided in the enclosed report showing that leadwas not detected in any of the groundwater samples. The analytical results for lead for this samplingevent and the previous events indicate that the lead concentrations in the groundwater samples are belowdrinking water standards.
Should you have any comments or questions on the groundwater sampling results, please call TauraNichols at (770) 421-3341 or Joe Chikowski at (732) 793-3531.
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
Taura Nichols Frederick K. Marotte, P.E.Project Engineer Principal Engineer
Attachmentscc: Joe Chikowski
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.3200 Town Point Drive NW; Suite 100
Kennesaw, GA30144770-421-3400 • Fax: 770-421-3486
MACTEC
November 21,2002
Mr. Joe Chikowski25 East Pelican WayOcean Beach, Unit IIILavallette, NJ 08735
Subject: 2002 Annual Groundwater Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesMACTEC Project No.: 41-2603-02
Dear Mr. Chikowski:
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. is pleased to provide this report for the sampling and analysis
of groundwater from the groundwater monitoring wells al the Palmetto Recycling Site (Site) in Columbia,
South Carolina (Figure 1). The groundwater sampling and analysis procedures were performed in general
accordance with the Remedial Action Work Plan (Revised June 2, 1999) and the "2002 Annual
Groundwater Sampling Event" letter issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA) in September 2002, allowing for a reduction of sampling locations (Attachment A).Groundwater sampling will be conducted annually for a five-year period following the completion of the
remedial action (RA) excavation and removal activities in 1999. This report summarizes the fieldprocedures and the laboratory results of the Fourth Annual Sampling Event.
Regulatory Status
As required by the Record of Decision (ROD, 1995), surface soils with lead concentrations above 400
ppm were excavated from the Site and the area was backfilled (January 1999 through February 1999). Apre-final inspection of the Site by the USEPA and South Carolina Department of Health and
Environmental Control was held in February 1999 and confirmed that the RA activities had been
completed. The USEPA removed the Site from the National Priority List (NPL) in October 2000.
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.-3200 Town Point Drive NW; Suite 100
Kennesaw, GA30144770-42^3400-Fax: 770-421-3486
Annual Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Report November 21, 2002Palmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesMACTEC Project 41-2603-02Page 2 of '3
In accordance with the Remedial Action Plan for future Site monitoring, the ROD required that the
groundwater be sampled and analyzed annually for total lead over a five-year period. The First AnnualGroundwater Monitoring Event, led by the EPA, was completed in November 1999. The Second and
Third Annual Groundwater Monitoring Events, led by Lucent, were completed in October 2000 and
December 2001, respectively. Lead concentrations in all Groundwater samples for the sampling events
were below the Federal Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for drinking water. The results of theFourth Annual Monitoring Event, conducted by Lucent, are provided herein.
After the third sampling event, Lucent proposed to discontinue the 2002 and 2003 Annual Groundwater
Sampling Events, because lead has not been detected (above drinking water standards) in the groundwatermonitoring wells sampled during the Remedial Action activities. Although this request was denied, EPA
allowed Lucent to reduce the monitoring well locations from twelve to eight during the 2002 AnnualGroundwater Sampling Event, as long as these locations included MW-1S, MW-3S, D, and MW-4S. The
letter from EPA is provided as Attachment A.
Field Procedures
The fieldwork was conducted from October 28, 2002 through October 30, 2002 and included sampling
eight monitoring wells (MW-1S, I, MW-3S, I, D, and MW-4S, I, D) for analysis of total and dissolved
lead (EPA Method 6010). The monitoring well locations are provided on Figure 2.
All field equipment was inspected, decontaminated, and calibrated prior to sampling each well. Before
purging each well, the Groundwater depth was measured and documented. All wells were then purgedusing a low-flow purging technique with a peristaltic pump until three well volumes were removed. Afterthe removal of three well volumes, the wells were sampled, and the groundwater sample was analyzed bya certified laboratory for dissolved and total lead. Due to high turbidity, the first sample from MW-1S(collected on October 28, 2002) was not analyzed and subsequently discarded appropriately. A secondsample, which was analyzed, was collected the following day, after the well had recharged and the
turbidity decreased. Also, MW-1I was only partially purged on October 28, 2002. The last ten gallons
were not purged due to nightfall. Yvonne Jones of the USEPA was notified and concurred that purging of
MW-11 could be continued and sampled the following day.
Annual Groundwater Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesMACTEC Project 41-2603-02Page 3 of 3
November 21, 2002
Laboratory Results
The laboratory analytical results and sample date are listed in the following table and the laboratoryanalytical result reports are provided as Attachment B.
Groundwater Analytical Results for the Palmetto Recycling Site
Monitoring Well
MW-1SMW-1IMW-3SMW-3IMW-3DMW-4SMW-4IMW-4D
Sample Date
10/29/0210/29/0210/30/0210/30/0210/30/0210/29/0210/29/0210/29/02
Total Lead(mg/1)
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
DissolvedLead (mg/1)
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
ND = concentrations not detected above the 0.005 mg/L detection limit
Lead was not detected in the groundwater samples above the detection limit. These results are consistentwith the results from the previous groundwater sampling events conducted by the USEPA and Lucent.
Should you have any comments or questions on the groundwater sampling results, please call TauraNichols at (770) 421-3341. We appreciate this opportunity to provide continued services to Lucent.
Sincerely,
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
Taura NicholsProject Engineer
Frederick K. Marotte, P.E.Principal Engineer
FIGURES
G:\ott\polmetto\remd\rev\sitemop.dwg 4/20/99 8:39 am
COLUMBIAHIGHLAND COUNTY
PALMETTORECYCLING
SOURCE: RlAS REPORT. COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORP.. NOVEMBER 1994
REMEDIAL ACTIONPALMETTO RECYCLING SITE
RICHLAND COUNTY.SOUTH CAROLINA
LAWENONttRINC AMD CNVWOMWCN1M. SERVICES
SITE LOCATION MAP
JOB NO. 41-2603-02 FIGURE 1
1 '
EXISTING CONCRETE PAD WITHSTEEL FRAME SUPERSTRUCTURE
,.__-- / STORACC ARE*»_——*~ \/ (REMOVED DURING RA)
LEGEND
BITtRwlTTCNT DRA»JAC£
• MTIBwtDUTC UOHTORMC "111• SWLUX MMTOBHC ItU.• ABANOONEO WOKaoRtNC wtU
SCAlt IN TEE!
DW - fc VnCSTIGAn^ 0(RtV[D W*STtSOORCt ff BASE UAP: tn/TS REPORT COU rtDCRAl. f S CORP, NOVCUKR 1
REMEDIAL ACTION-PALMETTO RECYCLING SITE
t. sc LAW
SITE LAYOUT ANDWELL LOCATION MAP
41-2603-022| I
ATTACHMENT A
UNITED STATES ENVTROKMENTAL PROTECnON AGENCY
REGION 4
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Septembo- 20.2002
Ms. Taura Nicholsreject Coordinator!•' iw Engineering & Environmental Services3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100" enne saw. Ge orgia 30144
Subject 2002 Annual Groundwater Sampling EventPalmetto Re cycling Site. Richland County, Columbia. South Carolina
Dear Ms. Nichols:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed the results of the groundwatersamples collected during the 1999, 2000 and 2001 Annual Groundwater Sampling Events and Lucent's
'ropoazi to Discontinue the 2002 & 2003 Annud Groundwater Sampling Events at the Palmettoycling Site dated April 29, 2002. At this time, EPA can not grant the discontinuation of the 2002 and
nual Groundwater Sampling Events. However. EPA wiH allow Lucent to reduce the monitoring well; from twelve to eight during the 2002 Annual Groundwater Sampling Event The eight monitoring
well locations shall include MW-1S, MW-3S. MW-3D & MW-4S. If the results of the 2002 Annual'Troundwater SamplingEvent are consistent (below the MCL) with the results ofprevious annual groundwaterampling events. EPA will allow Lucent to further reduce sampling points from eight to four for the 2003
Annual Groundwater Sampling Event. In addition, Lucent has the option to conduct the 2003 Annualjroundwater Sampling Event 6 months upon completion of the 2002 Annual Groundwater SamplingEvent.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, pie as efeelfree to contact me at A 04- 5 6 2- 879 3.iPA looks forward to continuing our cooperative working relationship with Lucent.
Sincerely.
Yvonne O. Jones
. :c: Mihir Mehta. SCDHEC
ATTACHMENT B
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stMnc.com
S E V E R N. T;R ENT
SERVICES
STL Savannah
LOG NO
LOG NO: S2-47832Received: 31 OCT 02Reported: 12 NOV 02
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-260302
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 141621112REPORT OF RESULTS Page 1
DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
47832-147832-247832-347832-447832-5
MW-4SMW-1SMW-1IMW-4IMW-4D
10-29-02/10:5510-29-02/12:3010-29-02/15:4510-29-02/15:4510-29-02/17:00
PARAMETER 47832-1 47832-2 47832-3 47832-4 47832-5
Kad (6010) , mg/1ilution Factorrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
Lead, (Dissolved) (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
<0.00501
11.05.0211.06.02
1105K
<0.00501
11.01.0211.05.02
1101J
<0.00501
11.05.0211.06.02
1105K
<0.00501
11.01.0211.05.02
1101J
<0.00501
11.05.0211.06.02
1105K
<0.00501
11.01.0211.05.02
1101J
<0.00501
11.05.0211.06.02
1105K
<0.00501
11.01.0211.05.02
1101J
<0.00501
11.05.0211.06.02
1105K
<0.0050.1
11.01.0211.05.02
1101J
STL Savannah (s a part of Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc.
S E V E R NTil E NT
SERVICES
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 3517858 -Tax: 912'352 0165 • www.sfrinc.com STL Savannah
LOG NO
LOG NO: S2-47832Received: 31 OCT 02Reported: 12 NOV 02
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-260302
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 141621112REPORT OF RESULTS Page 2
DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
47832-647832-747832-8
MW-3IMW-3SMW-3D
10-30-02/11:3210-30-02/11:4510-30-02/13:30
PARAMETER 47832-6 47832-7 47832-8
Lead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep Date^nalysis DatePiatch ID
Lead, (Dissolved) (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
<0.00501
11.05.0211.06.02
1105K
<0.00501
11.01.0211.05.02
1101J
<0.00501
11.05.0211.06.02
1105K
<0.00501
11.01.0211.05.02
1101J
<0.00501
11.05.0211.06.02
1105K
<0.00501
11.01.0211.05.02
1101J
Swarmed tea part <X Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc.
5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 3547858* fax: 91? 352 0165 • www.stMnc.com
S E V E R N
SERVICES
STL Savannah
LOG NO
LOG NO: S2-47832Received: 31 OCX 02Reported: 12 NOV 02
Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-260302
Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client
Code: 141621112REPORT OF .RESULTS Page 3
DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , QC REPORT FOR LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
47832-9 Method Blank47832-10 Lab Control Standard % Recovery
PARAMETER
Lead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep Date
^Analysis Datekatch ID
Lead, (Dissolved) (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
47832-9
<0.00501
11.05.0211.06.02
1105K
<0.00501
11.01.0211.05.02
1101J
47832-10
105 %1
11.05.0211.06.02
1105K
105 %1
11.01.0211.05.02
1101J
These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questionsregarding this test report should be directed to the STL Project Managerwho signed this test report.SC CERT #98001001
SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Third Edition,September 1986, and Updates -I, II, IIA, IIB, and III.
Gloria D. Fulwood, Project Manager
Final Page Of Report
STL Savannah te a psrtrf Senem Trent Laboratories, Inc.
REQUEST AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
STL Savannah
- >enai-'TL Savannah
5102 LaRocne AvenueSavannah, GA 31404
Website: www.stHnc.comPhone: (912) 354-7858Fax: (912) 352-0165
dD Alternate Laboratory Name/LocationPhone:Fax:
JECT REFERENCE PROJECT NO.
W-3L FP.O. NUMBER
PROJECT LOCATION
(STATICMATRIXTYPE REQUIRED ANALYSIS
PAGE OF
PROJECT MANAGR
CLIENT (SITE) PM
CONTRACT NO.
CLIENT PHONEV)0
CLIENT FAX^71 d-
CLIENT ADDRESS
CLIENT E-MAIL
COMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (if applicable)
SAMPLETIME SAMPLE IDENTIHCATION
s V*
NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED
STANDARD REPORTDELIVERY
DATE DUE
EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY(SURCHARGE)
DATE DUE
NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTEDPER SHIPMENT: .
REMARKS
- i 5la mW- I
I5HSt ^ W - M D
X\5Zd
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME RELINUISHED BY: (SIGNATUR DATE TIME RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME
RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME cSviR E c v o BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME
LABORATORY 'JSE ONLYDATE . •'•: :• TIME CUSTODY INTACT
'-YES'-OCUSTODYSEAL NO.
STL SAVANNAH •-.LOG NO. '.•
LABORATORY REMARKS
notAiMAl _ PFTIIRM TO I B DAP ATORV WITH SBMPIt(S\
MACTEC
December 8, 2003
Ms. Yvonne JonesNorth Superfund Site ManagementRegion IV, USEPA61 Forsyth StreetAtlanta, GA 30303-3104
Subject: 2003 Annual Grounthvater Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesMACTEC Project 41-2603-02
Dear Ms. Jones:
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. is pleased to provide the enclosed report for the Fifth Annual
Sampling Event at the Palmetto Recycling Site in Columbia, South Carolina. Groundwater sampling was
conducted annually for a five-year period following the completion of the remedial action excavation and
removal activities in 1999. This report summarizes the field procedures and the laboratory results of the
Fifth Annual Sampling Event. The groundwater sampling and analysis procedures were performed in
general accordance with the Remedial Action Work Plan (Revised June 2, 1999) and the "2002 Annual
Groundwater Sampling Event" letter issued by the USEPA in September 2002, allowing for a reduction
in the number of samples collected.
The results of the Fifth Annual Sampling Event are provided in the enclosed report and show that leadwas not detected above the detection limit of 0.005 mg/1 in the groundwater samples. The analytical
results for lead for this sampling event and the four previous events indicate that the lead concentrationsin the groundwater samples were below the Federal MCLs for drinking water (0.015 mg/1). In accordance
with the Remedial Action Plan for future Site monitoring, the ROD required that groundwater be sampled
and analyzed annually for total lead for five years. Since the lead concentrations in groundwater have
consistently remained below MCLs, Lucent requests the discontinuation of the annual groundwater
sampling events as specified in the ROD. It is our understanding that the USEPA plans on conducting a
Five-Year Review for this site. If you need assistance preparing the Five-Year Review, please let usknow if we may be of assistance.
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting3200 Town Point Drive NW, Suite 100 • Kennesaw, GA 30144
770-421-3400 • Fax: 770-421-3486
Should you have any comments or questions on the groundwater sampling results, please call Cynthia
Draper or Taura Nichols at (770) 421-3400 of Mactec or Steve Oberkrom of Lucent at (816) 246-7108.
MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC.
Frederick K. Marotte, P.E.Principal
.jCynthia DraperProject Manager
Taura NicholsProject Engineer
WITH PERMISSION
Attachments
cc: Steve OberkromMihir Mehta
MACTEC
December 8, 2003
Mr. Steve Oberkrom1067 N.W. Highpoint DriveLee's Summit, Missouri 64081
Subject: 2003 Annual Groundwater Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesMACTEC Project No.: 41-2603-02
Dear Mr. Oberkrom:
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. is pleased to provide this report for the sampling and analysis
of groundwater from the groundwater monitoring wells at the Palmetto Recycling Site (Site) in Columbia,South Carolina (Figure 1). The groundwater sampling and analysis procedures were performed in general
accordance with the Remedial Action Work Plan (Revised June 2, 1999) and the "2002 Annual
Groundwater Sampling Event" letter issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) in September 2002, allowing for a reduction of sampling locations. Groundwater sampling was
conducted annually for a five-year period following the completion of the remedial action (RA)
excavation and removal activities in 1999. This report summarizes the field procedures and the
laboratory results of the Fifth Annual Sampling Event.
Regulatory Status
As required by the Record of Decision (ROD, 1995), surface soils with lead concentrations above 400
ppm were excavated from the Site and the area was backfilled (January 1999 through February 1999). A
pre-fmal inspection of the Site by the USEPA and South Carolina Department of Health and
Environmental Control (SCDHEC) was held in February 1999 and confirmed that the RA activities had
been completed. The USEPA removed the Site from the National Priority List (NPL) in October 2000.
In accordance with the Remedial Action Plan for future Site monitoring, the ROD required that the
groundwater be sampled and analyzed annually for total lead over a five-year period. The First Annual
Groundwater Monitoring Event, led by the EPA, was completed in November 1999. The Second, Third
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting3200 Town Point Drive NW, Suite 100 • Kennesaw, GA 30144
770-421-3400 • Fax: 770-421-3486
Draft Annual Groundwater Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South Carolina, Lucent TechnologiesMACTEC Project 41-2603-02
December 8, 2003Page 2of3
and Fourth Annual Groundwater Monitoring Events, led by Lucent, were completed in October 2000,
December 2001, and October 2002, respectively. Lead concentrations in all groundwater samples for the
sampling events were below the Federal Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for drinking water. The
results of the Fifth Annual Monitoring Event, conducted by Lucent, are provided herein.
Field Procedures
The fieldwork conducted on October 23, 2003 included sampling four monitoring wells (MW-1S, MW-
3S, MW-3D, and MW-4S) for analysis of total and dissolved lead (EPA Method 6010). The monitoring
well locations are provided on Figure 2.
Field equipment was inspected, decontaminated, and calibrated prior to sampling each well. Before
purging of each well, the groundwater depth was measured and documented. Wells were then purgedusing a low-flow purging technique with a peristaltic pump until three well volumes were removed. After
the removal of three well volumes, the wells were sampled, and the groundwater samples were analyzedby a certified laboratory for dissolved and total lead. Due to increased turbidity (>10 NTU) at monitoring
well MW-4S, more than four well volumes were purged in this well. This well was sampled with a
turbidity of 20 NTU. The USEPA and SCDHEC were on-site to supervise the groundwater sampling.
Laboratory Results
The laboratory analytical results and sample data are listed in the following table and the laboratoryanalytical report is provided as Attachment A.
Groundwater Analytical Results for the Palmetto Recycling Site
Monitoring Well
MW-1SMW-3SMW-3DMW-4S
Sample Date
10/23/0310/23/0310/23/0310/23/03
Total Lead(nig/1)NDNDNDND
DissolvedLead (mg/1)NDNDNDND
ND = concentrations not detected above the 0.005 mg/L detection limit.
Draft Annual Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Report December 8. 2003Palmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South Carolina, Lucent Technologies Page Jo/3MACTEC Project 41-2603-02
Lead was not detected in the groundwater samples above the detection limit nor was it detected above the
MCL for drinking water (0.015 mg/L). These results are consistent with the results from the previous
groundwater sampling events conducted by the USEPA and Lucent.
Should you have any comments or questions on the groundwater sampling results, please call Taura
Nichols at (770) 421-3341 or Cynthia Draper at (770) 421-3565. We appreciate this opportunity to
provide continued services to Lucent.
Sincerely,
MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC.
Frederick K. Marotte, P.E. Juynthia DraperPrincipal Project Manager
WITH PERMISSIONTaura NicholsProject Engineer
FIGURES
G:\ott\polmetto\remd\rev\sitemop.dwg 4/20/99 8:39 om
COLUMBIARICHLAND COUNTY
PALMETTORECYCLING
SOURCE: RI/FS REPORT. COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORP.. NOVEMBER 1994
REMEDIAL ACTIONALMETTO RECYCLING SITE
RICHLAND COUNTY,SOUTH CAROLINA
LAWENGINEERING AMD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
SITE LOCATION MAP
JOB NO. 41-2603-02 FIGURE 1
EXISTING CONCRETE PAD WITHSUEL FRAME SUPIRSTRUCTURF.
LEGEND
——...—— KTCftirtTTCNT DRAINAGE
• HTERUtOATI UOWTOfflHC «LL• SHALLOW MOHTIORMC *tLt
• ABANDONED MONITORING wtu
SCALE IN FEET
I - ttl MVCSnCATWC OCRMO WASTESOURCC Or BASE UAf»; th/TJ RCPORf COW FTOCHAl PAOCRAWS CORP.. NOVCuDCR 1
REMEDIAL ACTION-PALMETTO RECYCLING SITE
rot/Nir. scSITE LAYOUT AND
WELL LOCATION MAP 41-2603-02ICURE
ATTACHMENT A
S E V E R N STLSTL Savannah 5102 LaRoche Avenue - Savannah CA 31404 Telephone:(912) 354-7858 Fax:(912) 351-3673
Analytical Report
For: Ms. Tara NicholsMACTEC Engineering and Consulting3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144
CC:
Order Number:S388609SDG Number:
Client Project ID:Project
Report DateSampled By
Sample Received DateRequisition Number: 41-260302
Purchase Order:
Palmetto Recycling11/07/2003Client10/27/2003
Gloria D. Fulwood, Project Manager
gfulwood@stl-i nc.com
The test results in this report meet all NELAP requirements for parameters for whichaccreditation is required or available. Any exceptions to NELAP requirements are noted inthis report. Pursuant to NELAP, this report may not be reproduced, except in full, without thewritten approval of the laboratory.
Page 1 of 6
STL Savannah 5102 LaRoche Avenue - Savannah CA 31404 Telephone:(912) 354-7858 Fax:(912) 351-3673
Sample SummaryOrder: S388609
Date Received: 10/27/2003Client: MACTEC Engineering and Consulting
Project: Palmetto Recycling
G lent Sanple IDEquipment BlankMW-1SW-3SIW-3DMW-3D DUPMW-4S
Lab Sanple ID5388609*15388609*25388609*35388609*45388609*55388609*6
MatrixLiquidLiquidLiquidLiquidLiquidLiquid
Date Sanpled10/23/2003 14:4010/23/2003 12:3010/23/2003 10:3010/23/2003 14:3010/23/2003 14:3010/23/2003 17:27
Page 2 of 6
STL Savannah 5102 LaRoche Avenue - Savannah CA 31404 Telephone:(912) 354-7858 Fax:(912) 351-3673
K Analytical Data Report
Sanple ID Description
88609-1 Equipment Blank88609-2 IW-1S88609-3 NW-3S88609-4 MW-3D88609-5 MW-3D DUP
Parameter Uhits
Lead (6010)
Lead mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
Lead, (Dissolved) (6010)
Lead, (Dissolved) mg/1Dilution FactorPrep Date
Ksis DateID
Matrix Date Received Date Sampled SDG#
Lab88609-1
<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281
<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281
Sanple IDs88609-2
<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281
<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281
Liquid 10/27/03Liquid 10/27/03Liquid 10/27/03Liquid 10/27/03Liquid 10/27/03
88609-3
<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281
<fl.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281
10/23/0310/23/0310/23/0310/23/0310/23/03
88609-4
<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281
<0.0050I10/28/0310/29/0310281
14:4012:3010:3014:3014:30
88609-5
<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281
<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281
Page 3 of 6
STL Savannah 5102 LaRoche Avenue - Savannah CA 31404 Telephone:(912) 354-7858 Fax:(912) 351-3673
Sanple ID Description
Analytical Data Report
Matrix Date Received Date Sanpled SDG#
88609-6 MW-4S
Parameter Lhits
Lead, (Dissolved) (6010)
Lead, (Dissolved)Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
rng/1
Liquid 10/27/03 10/23/03 17:27Lab Sanple IDs
88609-6
Lead (6010)
LeadDilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
mg/1 <0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281
<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281
Page 4 of 6
STL Savannah 5102 LaRoche Avenue - Savannah CA 31404 Telephone:(912) 354-7858 Fax:(912) 351-3673
Analytical Data Report
Sanple ID Description Matrix Date Received Date Sanpled SDG#
88609-7 Method Blank88609-8 Lab Control Standard % Recovery
Paraneter Lhits
Liquid 10/27/03Liquid 10/27/03
Lab Sanple IDs88609-7 88609-8
Lead (6010)
LeadDilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
mg/1 <0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281
101 %110/28/0310/29/0310281
Lead, (Dissolved) (6010)
Lead, (Dissolved)Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID
mg/1 <0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281
101 %110/28/0310/29/0310281
Page 5 of 6
STL Savannah 5102 LaRoche Avenue - Savannah CA 31404 Telephone:(912) 354-7858 Fax: (912) 351-3673
se test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questionsregarding this test report should be directed to the STL Project Managerwho signed this test report.SC CERT #98001001
SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Third Edition,September 1986, and Updates I, II, IIA, IIB, and III.
Page 6 of 6
Serial Number" 19417ANALYSIS REQUEST AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD STL Savannah
5102 LaRoche AvenueSavannah, GA 31404
Website: www.stl-inc.comPhone: (912)354-7858Fax: (912)352-0165
d> Alternate Laboratory Name/LocationPhone:Fax:
PROJECT REFERENCE PROJECT NO. PROJECT UDCATION(STATE)
MATRIXTYPE REQUIRED ANALYSIS PAGE OF
STL (LAB) PROJECT
CUEfiTJSITE) PM
P.O. NUMBER CONTRACT NO.
CLIENT PHONE
CLIENT NAME
LuCCAf
CLIENT FAX
CLIENT ADDRESS
CLIENT E-MAIL
6-COMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (if applicable)
/<rs
SAMPLEDATE TIME
C-/3SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
s
STANDARD REPORTDELIVERY
DATE DUE
EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY <O(SURCHARGE)
DATE DUE
NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTEDPER SHIPMENT:
NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED REMARKS
/" /i>//Vi ^C~
/0(3,V*^XX VX IV
RELIN DAT TIME DATE TIME RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME
RECEIVED BY: (SiGNAliORE) DATE TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DAfE RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME
LABORATORY USE ONLYRECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY: CUSTODY INTACT
YES ONO O
CUSTODYSEAL NO.
STL SAVANNAHLOG NO.
LABORATORY REMARKS '
STL824O680 (12/02)
ATTACHMENT G
Copies of Newspaper Notice - Community Involvement And
Interview Documentation Form
FROM SCDHEC EQC LAND/WASTE MANAGEMENTIHa U.S. Environments!Protection Agency (ERA)Region a and the SouinCaralina*Bep»<J<neni olHeoltn and Environmon-tal Conuol (DHEC)announce the com-mencement ol a Hve-Vear Review lor lha Pal-metto Recycling Super-land Sto in Columbia.Richland County, SouthCarolina. f~ivo ' YearRevio«$ are intended 10evaluate me protective-neaa or cleanup actionsU&*n at Superlund eiiee.EPA issued a Record ofDecision (ROD) in March30. 1995. which selected
(MON) 5. 17 '04 11:04/ST. 11:04/NO. 4861492560 P 2
THE STATE-RECORD CO., INC.Columbia, South Carolina
publisher of2004
excavation and
ROD required tho callec-lion ol additional confir-
the absence or presenceof aoll contaminationthrough olf-oilo migra-tion. The ROD also
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINACOUNTY OF RICHLAND
Personally appeared before me, Peggy Lawrence, Advertising Sales SupportManager of THE STATE, and makes oath that the advertisement,
that the remedy wasallociivo ai proieclinghuman health -a/id Uieenvironment. This is thefirst Rve-Year Review forthie Site.
Notice ~ Five Vear review for Palmetto Recycling Superfund Site, Columbia, SC
report will be availablefor public review or copy-ing at tne NortheastRegional Library, 7180Parklane Road. Colum-bia. SC 29223.For further informationpleaaa contactKalsna o. LongFederal and DrycleaningRamsdlailon SectionBureau of Land andWaste Management-SCDHEC8901 Farrow RoadColumbia SC, 29203Ph: (803) 896-4073Fax: (603) 396-4392E-Mail:
was inserted in THE STATE, a daily newspaper of general circulation published inCity of Columbia, State and County aforesaid, in the issues of
April 11,2004
Yvonne O. JonesRemedial Project Manag-erUS Environmental Pro-tection Agency. Region
Waste Management Orvl-slpn61 Forsyth Sireei. TlrtiA^nta. GA 30303 Subscribed and sworn to before mePh: (40i) 562-8793E-Mail:
on this day April 15, 2004
Notary Public
My commission expiresMarch 10.2013 "Errors- the liability of the publisher on account of errors in
or omissions from any advertisement will in no way exceedthe amount of the charge for the space occupied by the item inerror, and then only for the first incorrect insertion. "
INTERVIEW DOCUMENTATION FORMThe following is a list of individual interviewed
Yvonne Jones Remedial Project MgrName Title/Position
Mihir Mehta, P.E. Environmental EngrName Title/Position
Name Title/Position
Name Title/Position
Name Title/Position
Name Title/Position
for this five-year review.
EPA-Region 4Organization
SCDHEC-BLWMOrganization
Organization
Organization
Organization
Organization
04-12-2004Date
04-14-2004Date
Date
Date
Date
Date
ATTACHMENT H
Applicable or Relevant & Appropriate Requirements Review
MEMORANDUM
To: Keisha Long, Project Manager Federal and Dry Cleaning Remediation Section Division of Site Assessment and Remediation Bureau of Land and Waste Management
From: Gregory C. Simones, P. G., Risk Assessor Federal Facility Agreement Section Division of Site Assessment and Remediation Bureau of Land and Waste Management
Date: March 29, 2004
Re: Palmetto Recycling Site Columbia, Richland County, South Carolina
Review of Cleanup Levels
The above referenced document has been reviewed as it relates to Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), EPA Region IV Supplemental Guidance to RAGS, and the EPA Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance (Appendix G).
The following comments were generated from the review of this document. If you should have any questions, please contact me at (803) 896-4081.
Per your request (electronic, 03/25/04), I have reviewed the Soil Cleanup Goal for lead listed in the ROD (Table 4, Page 18) against current resources readily available through the Internet. The question, "Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action objectives (RAOs) used al the time of the remedy selection still valid?", from the five-year review guidance is used for this portion of the review.
Recommendations Regarding Remedial Levels For Chemicals in Site Soil
1) Lead - Yes, still valid; The remediation level of 400 mg/kg was based on the 1994 OSWER Directive 9355.4-12. The current soil remediation level is unchanged according to the 2001 Final Rule for Lead, "Identification of Dangerous Levels of Lead" on page 1211, Section II.F.3.
Therefore, it is recommended that no changes to the reviewed remediation levels be made.
Selected References
1) ATSDR, 2003, 1999 ToxProfile for Lead.
2) Federal Register, January 5, 2001, USEPA, 40 CFR Part 745, Lead; Identification of Dangerous Levels of Lead; Final Rule, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 1205-1240. http://www.epa.gov/lead/403 final.pdf.
3) USEPA, 2004, IRIS.
4) USEPA, August 2003, Superfund Lead-Contaminated Residential Sites Handbook, OSWER No. 9285.7-50, http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/lead/products/handbook.pdf.
5) USEPA, June 2001, Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance - Appendix G, EPA 540-R-01-007, OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P.
6) USEPA, March 1995, Record of Decision, Palmetto Recycling, Inc., Columbia, SC, EPA/ROD/R04-95/223, http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0495223.pdf.
ATTACHMENT I
List of Documents Reviewed
List of Documents Reviewed
1. "2002 Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Report, Palmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South Carolina."Mactec, December 2, 2002.
2. "2003 Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Report, Palmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South Carolina,"Mactec, December 8, 2003.
3. "Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis Report, Palmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, SouthCarolina," LawGibb Group, February 5, 2002.
4. ATSDR, 2003, 1999 ToxProfile for Lead.
5. "Direct Final Deletion of the Palmetto Recycling Site from the National Priorities List," EPA Region IV, July2000.
6. "EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Palmetto Recycling, Inc, EPA ID: SCD037398120, OU 01,Columbia, SC", March 30, 1995.
7. Federal Register, January 5, 2001, USEPA, 40 CFR Part 745, Lead; Identification of Dangerous Levels ofLead; Final Rule, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 1205-1240. http://www.epa.gov/lead/403 final.pdf.
8. "Final Close Out Report for the Palmetto Recycling Superfund Site, Columbia, Richland County, SouthCarolina," EPA Region IV (July 1999).
9. "Final Construction/Remedial Action Report for the Palmetto Recycling Site," LawGibb Group, May 6,1999 (Revised July 13, 1999).
10. "Palmetto Recycling Site Data," EPA Region IV Science and Ecosystem Support Division, January 18,2000.
11. "Palmetto Recycling Site Data," EPA Region IV Science and Ecosystem Support Division, May 9, 2000.
12. "Palmetto Superfund Site, Field Survey 11/18/98, Asbestos Survey in Office Building and Sample Results,"LawGibb Group, December 8, 1998.
13. "Transmittal of Draft Remedial Investigation (RI), Palmetto Recycling Superfund Site," CDM-FPC, Inc.,February 1994.
14. USEPA, June 2001, Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance - Appendix G, EPA 540-R-01-007,OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P.
15. USEPA, 2003, List of Drinking Water Contaminants and MCLs, 10 pp.
16. USEPA, August 2003, Superfund Lead-Contaminated Residential Sites Handbook, OSWER No.9285.7-50, http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/leadyproducts/handbook.pdf.
17. USEPA, 2004, IRIS.
ATTACHMENT J
Site Inspection Check Form and Photographs
OSWKRNo. 9355.7-03B-P
Five-Year Review Site Inspection Checklist
t
I. SITE INFORMATION
Site name: Palmetto Recycling
Location and Region: Columbia, SC; Region 4
Agency, office, or company leading the five-yearreview: SCDHEC
Remedy Includes: (Check all that apply)D Landfill cover/containment DD Access controls DD Institutional controls D0 Groundwatcr pump and treatment0 Surface water collection and treatmentQDOther Excavation/Soil cover
Date of inspection: 04/14/2004
EPA ID: SCD037398120
Weather/temperature: 62°; Partly
Monitored natural attenuationGroundwater containmentVertical barrier walls
cloudy
Attachments: D Inspection team roster attached
II. INTERVIEWS
1 . O&M site manager Yvonne Jones
D Site map attached
(Check all that apply)
RPMName Title
Interviewed D at site D at office DDby phone Phone no. 404-562-8793_Problems, suggestions: D Report attached
04/12/2004Date
2. O&M staffName
Interviewed D at site D at office D by phone PhoneProblems, suggestions: D Report attached
Title Dateno.
tG-l
OSWERNo. 9355.7-03B-P
t
Local regulatory authorities and response agencies (i.e., State and Tribal offices, emergency responseoffice, police department, office of public health or environmental health, zoning office, recorder ofdeeds, or other city and county offices, etc.) Fill in all that apply.
Agency _SCDHEC___Contact _Keisha D. Long_
NameEnvironmental Engr Assoc
Title Dale803-896-4073
Phone no.Problems; suggestions; 0 Report attached
Agency _SCDHEC______Contact _Mihir Mehta, P.E._
NameEnvironmental Engr
Title04/12/2004 803-896-4088
Date Phone no.Problems; suggestions; D Report attached
Agency __________________Contact __________________
NameProblems; suggestions; D Report attached
Title Date Phone no.
Agency ____________________Contact __________________
NameProblems; suggestions; D Report attached
Title Date Phone no.
Other interviews (optional) D Report attached.
G-2
t OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P
m. ON-SITE DOCUMENTS & RECORDS VERIFIED (Check all that apply)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
O&M DocumentsD O&M manual DD As-built drawingsD Maintenance logsRemarks
Readily available D Up toD Readily availableD Readily available
Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan D Readily availableD Contingency plan/emergency response plan D Readily availableRemarks
O&M and OSHA Training Records D Readily availableRemarks
Permits and Service AgreementsD Air discharge permitD Effluent dischargeD Waste disposal, POTW DD Other permitsRemarks
Gas Generation Records DRemarks
Settlement Monument RecordsRemarks
Groundwater Monitoring RecordsRemarks
Leachate Extraction RecordsRemarks
Discharge Compliance RecordsD A i rD Water (effluent)Remarks
Daily Access/Security LogsRemarks
D Readily availableD Readily available
Readily available D Up toD Readilv available
Readily available D Up to
D Readily available
D Readily available
D Readily available
D Readily availableD Readily available
D Readily available
date DN/AD Up to daleD Up to date
D Up to dateD Up to date
D Up to date
D Up to dateD Up to date
date DN/AD Up to date
date DN/A
D Up to date
DDUp to date
D Up to date
D Up to dateD Up to date
D Up to date
DN/ADN/A
DN/ADN/A
DN/A
DN/ADN/ADN/A
DN/A
DN/A
DN/A
DN/ADN/A
DN/A
G-3
OSWERNo. 9355.7-03B-P
t
IV. O&M COSTS
1. O&M OrganizationD State in-house 0 Contractor for StateDDPRP in-house D Contractor for PRPD Federal Facility in-houseD Contractor for Federal FacilityD Other
2. O&M Cost RecordsD Readily available D Up to dateD Funding mechanism/agreement in placeOriginal O&M cost estimate D Breakdown attached
Total annual cost by year for review period if available
From To D Breakdown attached
3.
A.
1.
B.
1.
Date DateFrom To
Date DateFrom To
Date DateFrom To
Date DateFrom To
Date Date
Unanticipated or Unusually HighDescribe costs and reasons:
V. ACCESS AND INSTI'
Fencing
Total costD Breakdown attached
Total costD Breakdown attached
Total costD Breakdown attached
Total costD Breakdown attached
Total cost
O&M Costs During Review Period
rUTIONAL CONTROLS D Applicable DD N/A
Fencing damaged D Location shown on site map D Gates secured DN/ARemarks
Other Access Restrictions
Signs and other security measuresRemarks
D Location shown on site map DN/A
G-4
t OSWERNo. 9355.7-03 fi-P
c.1.
2.
D.
1.
2.
3.
Institutional Controls (ICs)
Implementation and enforcementSite conditions imply ICs not properly implemented D Yes D NoSite conditions imply ICs not being fully enforced D Yes D No
Tvpe of monitoring (e.g.. self-reporting, drive bv")FrequencvResponsible party/agcncvContact
Name Title Date
Reporting is up-to-date D Yes D NoReports are verified by the lead agency D Yes D No
Specific requirements in deed or decision documents have been met D Yes 0 NoViolations have been reported D Yes D NoOther problems or suggestions: D Report attached
Adequacy D ICs are adequate D ICs are inadequateRemarks
General
Vandalism/trespassing D Location shown on site map DNo vandalism evidentRemarks
Land use changes on site DN/ARemarks
Land use changes off site DN/ARemarks
DN/ADN/A
Phone no.
DN/ADN/ADN/ADN/A
DN/A
VI. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS
A.
1.
Roads D Applicable D N/A
Roads damaged D Location shown on site map DRoads adequate D N/ARemarks
G-5
OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P
B. Other Site Conditions
Remarks
VII. LANDFILL COVERS D Applicable DN/A
VIII. VERTICAL BARRIER WALLS D Applicable DN/A
A.
IX. GROUNDWATER/SURFACE WATER REMEDIES DApplicable DN/AGrouhdwater Extraction Wells, Pumps, and Pipelines D Applicable DN/A
1 . Pumps, Wellhead Plumbing, and ElectricalD Good condition D All required wells properly operating D Needs Maintenance D N/ARemarks
2.
3.
B.
1.
2.
3.
Extraction System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes, and Other AppurtenancesD Good condition D Needs MaintenanceRemarks
Spare Parts and EquipmentD Readily available D Good condition D Requires upgrade 0 Needs toRemarks
be provided
Surface Water Collection Structures, Pumps, and Pipelines D Applicable DN/A
Collection Structures, Pumps, and ElectricalD Good condition D Needs MaintenanceRemarks
Surface Water Collection System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes, and Other AppurtenancesD Good condition D Needs MaintenanceRemarks
Spare Parts and EquipmentD Readily available D Good condition D Requires upgrade 0 Needs toRemarks
be provided
tG-6
OSWER No. 9355.7-03K-P
t
c.1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
D.1.
2.
Treatment System D Applicable DN/A
Treatment Train (Check components that apply)D Metals removal D Oil/water separation D BioremediationD Air stripping D Carbon adsorbersD FiltersD Additive (e.g.. chelation agent. flocculcnOD OthersD Good condition D Needs MaintenanceD Sampling ports properly marked and functionalD Sampling/maintenance log displayed and up to dateD Equipment properly identifiedD Quantity of groundwater treated annuallyD Quantity of surface water treated annuallyRemarks
Electrical Enclosures and Panels (properly rated and functional)D N/A D Good condition D Needs MaintenanceRemarks
Tanks, Vaults, Storage Vessels0 N/A D Good condition D Proper secondary containment D Needs MaintenanceRemarks
Discharge Structure and AppurtenancesD N/A D Good condition D Needs MaintenanceRemarks
Treatment Building(s)D N/A D Good condition (esp. roof and doorways) D Needs repairD Chemicals and equipment properly storedRemarks
Monitoring Wells (pump and treatment remedy)D Properly secured/locked D Functioning D Routinely sampled D GoodD All required wells located D Needs MaintenanceRemarks
Monitoring DataMonitoring DataDls routinely submitted on time D Is of acceptable qualityMonitoring data suggests: No plume onsiteD Groundwater plume is effectively contained D Contaminant concentrations
conditionDN/A
are declining
G-7
OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P
D. Monitored Natural Attenuation
Monitoring Wells (natural attenuation remedy)D Properly secured/locked DFunctioningDRoutinely sampled DGood conditionDAII required wells located D Needs Maintenance D N/ARemarks________________________________________________
X. OTHER REMEDIES
If there are remedies applied at the site which are not covered above, attach an inspection sheet describingthe physical nature and condition of any facility associated with the remedy. An example would be soilvapor extraction.
XI. OVERALL OBSERVATIONS
A. Implementation of the Remedy
The cleanup goals established in the Record of Decision for soil have been met. Thelong-term protectiveness of the remedial action (excavation/soil cover) was verified bycontinued monitoring of groundwater to confirm that the remedy was effective atprotecting human health and the environment. Current groundwater monitoringindicates that the groundwater concentrations for lead are below the health-based levelof 15 parts per billion (ppb).
B. Adequacy of O&MCurrent groundwater monitoring indicates that the groundwater concentrations for leadare below the health-based level of 15 parts per billion (ppb).
C. Early Indicators of Potential Remedy ProblemsNot Applicable
D. Opportunities for OptimizationNot Applicable
G-8
Shell of the Palmetto Recycling, Inc. building. Koon Store Road is to the left
Residence across the street (Koon Store Road) from the Site
Monitoring wells at the Site