View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Graduate Mission
Superior Graduate Study Options Quality of Enrollment Advanced Scholarship through Assessment Rigorous Courses & Options Student Scholarship Faculty Scholarship
Criterion 1: Sustained Achievements Attracting Quality Candidates Enrollment Management
Recruitment Plan Selection Criteria Acceptance Rate
Assistantship/Scholarship Management Annual Awards Competitive Awards
Matriculation Management Graduate Placement
Criterion 2 Sustained Achievements Fostering Scholarship
Assessment Results Center for Academic Support & Achievement Written & Oral Communication Depth of Knowledge (Technology & Ethics) Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Research & Scholarship
Assessment Results Graduate School
Criterion 3 Rigorous Courses and Options
Sustained Mission Planning Sustained Curricular Leadership
Administration Contributions to Quality Faculty Contributions to Quality
External Review Contributions to Quality Capstone Contributions to Quality Student Contributions to Quality Alumni Contributions to Quality External Partnership Contributions To Quality
Criterion 4 Sustained Student Research/Creative Activities Sustained Student Research
Productivity Engagement
Commitment to Research & Travel Grants Showcasing Scholarship Award Participation
What is a Consultation?
Informal Summary Documenting Criteria Informal Presentation to Review Board Only Guidance for a Decision about a Full Review Identification of Criteria that Appear to be Met Identification of Criteria that Appear not to be Met
How Does it Start?
Chair Collaborates with Coordinator: Makes decision to apply
Chair & Coordinator Select Program Team, Team Leader, Team Consultants (if desired)
Chair or Coordinator Request a Consultation Date
Outcome Following a Consultation
Dean Provides a Formal Summary of Strengths/Weaknesses via the CGS Board’s Review in 30 Days
Meeting with Dean to Review Report Program Communicates Decision for Pursuing Full
Review
What is a Full Review?
Comprehensive Evaluation of a Program Formal Report with Format Expectations Report Required 30 Days in Advance Presentation to Entire CGS CGS Provides Feedback to Review Board Board Makes Recommendation to Dean Formal Report and Decision
What is Included in a Full Review Report?
Program Mission Program Degree Requirements Program Admission Requirements Other Essential Elements Documentation of How Criteria Met/Sustained Highlights of Exemplary Achievements
How is a Full Review Conducted?
Documents Reviewed by CGS & CGS Board Formal Presentation to CGS by Program Team Program Team Discussion with CGS CGS Board Discussion with CGS Recommendation by CGS Board to Dean Decision by Dean
What is the Outcome of a Full Review
Program Achieves or Does Not Achieve the First Choice Designation
Review Board Provides Dean with Summary Report Dean Completes Formal Report for Program If Achieved, Resources Follow If Not Achieved, Meetings Held to Review Needs
AQIGP: Academic Quality Improvement for Graduate Programs
Selection Process
Consultation Process
Report
Suspending Enrollments
Enrollment Limitations Assessment Limitations Curriculum Limitations Student Research/Creative Activity Limitations Faculty Scholarship Limitations