Finsbury Park News - August 14

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Finsbury Park News - August 14

    1/8

    If you wish to have anything included in future newsletters forward to the [email protected]

    Monthly News

    London Underground would have us believe that

    fairness is one of the five behaviours expected ofall staff. Really? A driver at Arnos Grove raised a

    grievance against a Duty Manager who forced him

    onto overtime by giving him false information andfailing to use any of the available spares. The

    evidence was strong, with radio and phone

    messages obtained and listened to by the

    investigating manager, all of which showed what

    the DTSM had done. Despite this, the investigatingmanager decided that, although errors had been

    made by the manager, he could not conclude that hehad acted maliciously. This ludicrous and self-

    serving decision was upheld by the TOM at appeal.

    A different grievance was raised by a driver on the

    last day of strike action earlier in the year. Healleged that a picket had been abusive towards him

    when they met at a railway station on their

    respective journeys home. In this case there was noverifiable evidence, only one personsword against

    the other. However, the same manager (by acoincidence) who had investigated the first

    grievance and found nothing malicious in theactions of the accused DTSM, decided to suspend

    the picket from duty and subject him to a Drug and

    Alcohol Test (which proved negative). After

    thorough investigations (so thorough that no-oneeven bothered to interview the

    Picketswife who was the only other witness to the

    incident), the picket was told that he would be sent

    to a CDI where he could be sacked. This unsettling

    and frankly disgraceful period was finally broughtto a close after some excellent behind-the -scenes

    work by RMT reps backed with the full support of

    the branch with a request for ballot for industrial

    action should our member be disciplined. Thepicket has now been returned to work after a

    worrying period of over 2 months.Fairness? These managers dont know the meaningof the word. It seems that with grievances, its not

    about whats right its about who raises the

    grievance and whos on the end of It If you raise agrievance against a manager, you need to show himholding a smoking gun with a corpse lying at his

    feet. Even then, the investigating manager wil

    probably conclude that he acted in self-defence!

    ROUND TH E BRANCH REPS REPORTS

    Zehra Nazim Brixton

    Hello all. The beginning of this year was very difficulfor me and I was off the trains while dealing withsome health issues. Although I was off the trains was, as some of you know, still dealing with unionduties. Some of these duties included the newtimetable, the roster and allocation and driversmoving to Seven Sisters. There are going to be somemore drivers coming into Brixton but we will not be atfull complement until these drivers are fully qualified.

    There have been some concerns about nights notbeing covered. I have asked management about thisand the response was that this is due to coverage andcancelations, and that it was better suited to coveduties during the day and leave the night uncovered.If anyone needs more information please contact me.So as we now stand; we're 17 drivers down from theold timetable. Now that the new duty books havebeen issued a couple of issues have

    Finsbury Park

    Branch

    All grades united in one common object August 2014

  • 8/11/2019 Finsbury Park News - August 14

    2/8

  • 8/11/2019 Finsbury Park News - August 14

    3/8

    3

    blown bulbs. A sensible way forward I hear you

    say. It would be if it didn't mean that the LEDsignals were harder to see on approach, if the signal

    head is out of alignment, thus resulting in a

    potential increase in SPADs. A signal on the

    approach to Bounds Green W/B was clobberedseveral times in a couple of months; the signal was

    realigned and wasn't hit for 18 months, bingo! The

    Rep's took their concerns to Phil Hufton and as aresult a new type LED bulb, with a wider spread of

    light, has been designed and will soon be fitted

    throughout the tunnel section on the Picc. The IRRep's are going to pursue the SPAD's on personal

    file issue and we should push for all SPADs to be

    removed from drivers records since the fitting of the

    old type LED bulbs !The Piccadilly Line OPOmonitors suffer from sunlight issues at certain

    locations which result in problems viewing the PTI.

    The Rep's are pursuing better equipment at known

    trouble spots to engineer out the problem. In themeantime, if you're in any doubt of the view of the

    PTI, request assisted despatch at Cat A platforms. If

    anything happens you could well find yourself on amanslaughter charge! A number of suggestions to

    improve our cabs have been submitted. Our ageing

    fleet is with us for a number of years and certain

    things are falling into decline. Advice is to keepbooking up faults as the depots will tell us nothings

    wrong if defect log books are empty. Still pursuing

    the solution of disarming the console buttons when

    the CSDE over ride is operated. A figure of 25k hasbeen mentioned, all we need now is for Picc

    management to place the order. No engineeringmitigation as yet to prevent doors opening between

    stations, so if you lose your pilot light, fear the

    worst!

    Meetings have taken place regarding the proposed

    new CFDT. We are dead against any walking across

    the track to gain access to the depot and are seekingsafer alternative walkways. Why do we need a new

    depot anyway? Thought LUL were trying to saveMoney??

    Dave

    Mark Walters Seven Sisters Local Rep

    I t would appear that Victoria L ine Managers are

    up to there old tr icks " if everything fail s blame the

    Driver" .

    When a train arrived a couple of minutes late and

    was routed off book into Brixton platform 2 insteadof platform 1, the Driver not seeing a Manager

    assumed that their next train would be departing

    from the same platform. Upon leaving the step back

    room he noticed the train in platform 2 was alreadyopened up but the train in platform 1 was not

    Believing there may have been a reformation on his

    second train as so often happens and afterinterrogating his duty book, he made his way to the

    north end office along his 'booked' departure

    platform, which was platform 1.

    Upon arriving there he was informed by the DTSM

    that the train in platform 2 was indeed his train, but

    he had put another driver on it due to not being able

    to find the correct Driver. After the Driver hadexplained how this situation had arisen from his

    point of view i.e. no information, a train opened upalready and arriving off book in the first place, hewas asked to take the train in platform 1 with no

    further issues, or so it would seem!

    The day after, he was interviewed by a DRM who

    told him that in his opinion the delay was caused bythe Driver and would be logged as an error against

    him for not being in the 'correct position' on time.

    The DRM also stated that the Driver was also atfault for not contacting the signaler when he first

    arrived and for being on the 'wrong' (booked)departure platform.

    The Driver of course strongly feels that the cause of

    the delay was not solely down to him and offered

    plenty of mitigating circumstances, which wereignored. This incident has indeed raised many

    issues about how step backs are being managed at

    both Brixton and Walthamstow as a consequence

  • 8/11/2019 Finsbury Park News - August 14

    4/8

    4

    the following points are being taken up with the

    Line Management. Because trains are frequentlyreformed and given to others, was the Driver wrong

    to go to his booked departure platform? If the

    Drivers train was actually in platform 1, but he/she

    was standing on 2 and it departed late as aconsequence would management not argue that they

    were not in position? There is no directive which

    states that a Driver should pick up from the sameplatform if arrived off book without being notified

    to do so first by a Manager? There is also no

    directive which states that a Driver should informthe signaler that he/she as arrived off book?

    Surely the correct platform position for departure is

    that which is stated in the duty book as it is

    reflecting the working timetable. And should aDriver work outside the timetable he/she should be

    advised to do so first? Are signalers notifying step

    back managers that trains will be arriving off book

    at any given time, and are step back managersnotifying Drivers upon arrival.

    All of these questions will be answered.

    Tel: 07930320454

    Email:[email protected]

    RMT Preparing Ballot Of Locked OutCleaners

    Our members working for ISS on the London

    Underground Contract have been in dispute with

    their employer for many months over the use of a

    Biometric Fingerprinting to book on for duty. We

    had been in talks with the company but now this

    process has been imposed by the company on our

    members. As a result of this imposition, our

    members have been reminded of the unions

    instruction that they should refuse to use the

    Biometric technology and should continue to use

    the agreed manner to book on.The GGC has noted

    a resolution from our Finsbury Park Branch that a

    number of our members have now been locked out

    of their workplace for refusing to use the Biometric

    Booking on System. In many cases those being

    locked out have been RMT representatives. In

    support of these members, the Council o

    Executives agreed to make a one of payment of

    50 to those who had been locked out as of 8th

    July 2014 and will be keeping the situation under

    review. Furthermore, the GGC has noted that talks

    are taking place under the auspices of ACAS. In

    the meantime, in support of our locked ou

    members, we are preparing a ballot matrix o

    affected members

    How does this meet any dignity at work rule

    scrambling across obstacles to book on?

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/11/2019 Finsbury Park News - August 14

    5/8

    5

  • 8/11/2019 Finsbury Park News - August 14

    6/8

    6

    RMT takes fight against global union-

    busters Sodexo to their London HQCampaigners and trade unionist fighting the

    victimisation and dismissal of RMT union

    activist Petrit Mihaj have been taking the battle

    against global union-busters Sodexo to the

    front door of the companys London

    headquarters

    Petrit has been a major force in building union

    organisation on the LUL Sodexo depot catering

    contract and has been instrumental in securing

    union recognition and delivering improvements

    in pay and conditions and effective

    representation of staff. An Employment

    Tribunal has already ruled that Petrits

    dismissal was 100% unfair and that he was

    sacked for his trade union activities but under

    the UKs notorious anti-union laws the

    company are under no obligation to reinstate

    him to his original job.

    RMT has had no option but to begin a

    campaign of industrial action and public

    protests to secure workplace justice and a

    return to work for Petrit Mihaj.

    Sodexo itself, one of the Governments

    favourite private contractors, has a long

    worldwide form sheet when it comes to union

    bashing and treating its workforce like dirt.

    With a lucrative portfolio of contracts in prisons

    the NHS, schools, defence and other parts of

    the public sector, Sodexo was recently

    exposed in the national press for a catalogue

    of claims of bullying, racism and harassment

    This includes a report that an employee was hit

    by a director who said it was punch a black

    week. Other reports say that the personne

    section in Sodexos defence division has been

    ethnically cleansed of non-white staff.

    The culture of bullying and racism isntrestricted to Sodexos UK operations. In 2005

    the company was forced to pay 47.2 million to

    settle a lawsuit brought by thousands of black

    employees in America who had been routinely

    barred from promotion and segregated by the

    company.

    RMT Acting General Secretary Mick Cash said

    It is shameful that a company like Sodexowith its shocking track record of racism

    bullying and union-busting, are allowed to win

    Government and London Underground

    contracts. That is the message that we wil

    taking to the front door of Sodexos London

    headquarters on Monday morning along with

    the call for the reinstatement of our colleague

    Petrit Mihaj.

    Petrit has stood up for the union and for his

    colleagues and it is only right that the entire

    RMT organisation, and the rest of the wider

    labour and trade union movement, stands

    shoulder to shoulder with him now that he is

    being attacked and victimised. Petrits fight is

    part of the global battle against these bullying

  • 8/11/2019 Finsbury Park News - August 14

    7/8

    7

    union-busting facilities companies who are

    hoovering up multi-million pound public

    contracts while treating their staff like dirt. They

    should be banned from public works, as the

    law allows.

    This is the most blatant and clear-cut example

    of victimisation and dismissal on the grounds of

    union activity that it is possible to imagine a

    fact backed up by the Employment Tribunal. It

    is due to the anti-union and anti-worker laws in

    this country that we have to continue to

    campaign for the reinstatement of Petrit Mihaj

    and in defence of strong, fighting union

    organisation at Sodexo and other facilities

    companys out of the same mould please

    support the future protests outside thisshameful employer.

    Our Regional Organiser has reported that

    management are not conducting meaningful

    negotiations over this plans and are in fact moving

    to implement them without agreement. We are

    acting in conjunction with our sister union TSSA

    and have outlined our demands which are as

    follows:

    A clear unconditional commitment that no

    member of staff will suffer a loss of

    substantive pay

    To state how many jobs they propose to cut,

    if it has been changed from 953 after the

    station by station review.

    To state what contingency plans have been

    put in place should they continue to close

    ticket offices.

    Assurances for the withdrawal of thei

    notices summoning staff to the

    Development Centres.

    Meaningful negotiations

    A mass meeting of all London Underground

    members has been arranged to discuss the

    current situation in our campaign against LULs

    plans to cut jobs and close ticket offices. The

    meeting has been called to gauge the view o

    members which will be fed back to the unions

    executive when it considers our next course of

    action.

    The meeting will take place on Friday 22nd

    August 2014 at the Indian YMCA near Warren

    Street Station from 2pm.

    Indian YMCA

    41 Fitzroy Square

    London W1T 6AQ

    HAVE YOU VOTED IN

    THE GS ELECTION

    YET?CLOSING DATE 22ND

    SEPTEMEBER.

    Get your vote in the

    post today!

  • 8/11/2019 Finsbury Park News - August 14

    8/8

    8

    A Message from our Chair

    We are half way through the year, and under ourStanding Orders, many of our Reps have so far

    fallen very short of our target of 25%

    attendance. As your branch Chair I am cannot andwill not sit back while some are claiming to step up,

    are apparantly "sleeping" on the job.

    As a result I've asked the Secretary to compile a listof the attendance of Reps and Officers before thenext branch meeting for me in September. It will

    not quite be a "name & shame" but as we approach

    the next round of strike action we need all soldiers

    standing on the front line. We also need you, as therank and file members to be asking your Reps each

    month "What did you do at the branch last month

    Comrade?" Accountability is a two way street; youcheck them locally. As Officers we check them at

    the branch.

    Attendance at branch meetings have remainedhealthy, we have not lost a branch meting so far this

    year other than those we've moved due to

    strikes. We now have a full level of Officers and

    Chair but still outstanding a Treasurer. We are shortof a number of Rep's within the Cleaners Grade,

    especially on the Piccadilly Line and Brixton. Most

    of our Reps seem to be short on "hands on" trainingon discipline hearing thereby ending up leaving

    cases to the level II Reps. On the rest of the

    combine all Reps are being called together onFriday the 22nd to address the latest developments

    regarding Every Jobs Matter (EJM) and to see

    where we are going with the dispute. In my other

    role as Vic President of the Regional Council, withthe help of another one of our Branch member Dave

    Rayfield, in his role as LTRC Membership

    Secretary, we have kicked off the Combine wideRecruitment and Retentions starting with of course

    part of our branch, and have so far done the Centra

    and Bakerloo lines. Next month we are hoping tovisit the Docklands. These Regional R&R will all

    be coordinated by Dave Rayfield.

    The Branches are great place for training on public

    speaking and information about what's happeningon other parts of the branch area and is open to all

    RMT members. Every second Thursday we have an

    opening for guest speakers. If you have a subject

    you want to inform our members about, give me acall in advance of the 2nd meeting each month.

    Glenroy Watson hair Finsbury Park