EXHIBIT D

MPAG Meeting Summary

Exhibit D

Belmore State Forest (BSF)

10-Year Resource Management Plan

Management Plan Advisory Group (MPAG) Public Meeting/Public Hearing Summary

February 20, 2008, 6:00/6:30 p.m. @ Penney Farms Town Hall

4100 Clark Avenue, Penney Farms, Florida 32079

MPAG Members Present: Affiliation: Matthew Corby St. John’s River Water Management District Roger Farrell 4-H Association Volunteer-President Allan Hallman Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Biologist Bruce Hill Florida Division of Forestry (DOF), Jacksonville District Manager Kelly Mosley Landowner- Clay County FFA Teacher Members Absent: Chereese Stewart Clay County Commissioner-District 5 Hallie Stevens The Nature Conservancy William Grubbs Soil and Water Conservation District

Public Present: Mary Berning Interested citizen Carol Nechvatal Interested citizen Marguerite Mueller Interested citizen Eugene and Matt Hickey (Father/son) Adjacent Landowner Mac DuPree Interested Citizen Edwin Matthews Interested Citizen Kensel Harris Interested Citizen Lester Culver Interested Citizen Charles Green Adjacent Landowner Rod Murray Interested Citizen Arvid and Linda Nelson Interested Citizens Bob Buehen Jennings State Forest Liaison Panel Member DOF Staff Present: Steven Montgomery Forester, Belmore State Forest Todd Knapp Forest Resource Administrator, JSF Frank Burley Forestry Supervisor II, JSF Heather Venter Biological Scientist II, JSF Elizabeth Smith Administrative Secretary, JSF Jim Grubbs State Lands Management Coordinator Katie Lewis State Lands Planning Coordinator ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 6:15 p.m. Public Meeting: Jim Grubbs started by thanking the MPAG members for attending and introduced Katie Lewis. Jim continued the meeting by giving an overview of the approval process of a ten-year resource management plan. Jim went on to explain the purpose of the public hearing to the MPAG members and others that were present. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Exhibit D

6:30 p.m. Public Hearing: Jim Grubbs opened by welcoming members and thanking them for their participation in the BSF 10-Year Resource Management Plan Advisory Group (MPAG). Jim explained the purpose of management plans and the approval process (through the Acquisition and Restoration Council). Frank Burley thanked everyone for making the effort to come to public hearing. Then, he introduced the JSF staff as well as members of the MPAG to the public in attendance. One member of the public had the following comment at that time: A landowner was concerned that individuals living in the community were not notified of the meeting and were not aware of what would be occurring on BSF. Jacksonville District staff assured the gentleman that copies of the management plan were available 30 days prior to the meetings in three of the local libraries and at the Jennings State Forest office headquarters. He was also informed that the meeting announcement had be published in the Clay County newspaper as well as on signs posted on the BSF forest boundary. Following the introductions, Steven Montgomery, Forester of BSF provided a power point presentation describing the natural community types, waterways, and research areas on BSF. Five (5) MPAG members and fourteen (14) interested citizens from the public were in attendance for the public hearing. The floor was opened up to questions. Below is a summary of questions asked during the public hearing. Does Ates Creek flow to the north? Steven Montgomery stated Ates Creek indeed flows to the north, where it eventually flows into the South Fork of Black Creek. Are all the roads on BSF going to be accessible to the public? Steven Montgomery stated that not all of the roads on BSF would be open for public use, but most of them will be. The roads in the southwest boundary of the forest may be too sandy for public use. He also stated that the road map in the plan will identify roads that will be opened to the public. What kinds of recreation will be available to the public on the BSF? Frank Burley replied that they plan to offer hiking, bicycling, horseback riding, camping, hunting, and fishing on BSF. Will there be ATV use available on the property? Why? Frank Burley stated that ATV use was not a planned use on BSF. Jim Grubbs explained that balancing compatible-uses is something that we struggle with on all state lands. Is the property along the eastern boundary under state ownership? Beth Smith stated that the property to the east is currently owned by Wachovia, but it has been included in the BSF optimal boundary map. Is BSF open to hiking? Is the boundary fenced? Frank Burley stated that at the moment, BSF is not open to hiking just yet, but should be in early summer. Most of the forest boundary has been fenced. Will the hunting on BSF be regulated? Frank Burley answered that FWC will be regulating the hunting on BSF. The FWC representative added that the information will be included in the hunting brochure for BSF. Would it be possible to have a non-quota hunt for senior citizens? Frank Burley stated that issue will need to be addressed by FWC because they will be regulating the hunting on BSF. Would the roads be open for driving during hunting season? Frank Burley stated that the roads for public access will remain open all year. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 7:00 P.M. Additional Public Comments

Horseback riders would like to see parking areas available for horse trailers that are close to the trails. Have no objections to hunting, it is an inconvenience, but it is okay.

Exhibit D

The community would like to be more aware of what is going on at BSF. Concerned with the under staffing of FWC officers.

Could the state keep in mind, the idea of having an ATV area on the east side of the forest that has no residential area adjacent to it, so noise pollution would not be an issue?

I was born near the forest and could provide some history of the families that lived in the area. Would like to have a senior citizen quota hunt. Would like to see a senior citizen hunt quota that is limited to Clay County. Would like to have ATV use on BSF. All for the multiple-use concept, but hunters pay and get the shortest

amount of time. FWC should consider dog hunting on BSF. A general request for more public use. Continually look for more public lands. Seems like everyone

contributes to purchasing the lands, but few get to use them. Jim Grubbs thanked everyone for attending and offering their comments. The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. **Attached is an additional written comment received from a MPAG member prior to the hearing.

Exhibit D

Belmore State Forest (JSF) 10-Year Resource Management Plan

Management Plan Advisory Group (MPAG)

Public Meeting Summary February 21, 2008, 10:00a.m. @ Penney Farms Town Hall

4100 Clark Avenue, Penney Farms, Florida 32079

MPAG Members Present: Affiliation: Bruce Hill Florida Division of Forestry (DOF), Jacksonville District Manager Allan Hallman Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Biologist Matthew Corby St. John’s River Water Management District Tom Cheyne (for William Grubbs) Soil and Water Conservation District Roger Farrell 4-H Association Volunteer-President Members Absent: Chereese Stewart Clay County Commissioner-District 5 Kelly Mosley FFA Teacher and Landowner Hallie Stevens Nature Conservancy Others Present: Todd Knapp DOF, Forest Resource Administrator, JSF Frank Burley DOF, Forestry Supervisor II, JSF Heather Venter DOF, Biological Scientist II, JSF Elizabeth Smith DOF, Administrative Secretary, JSF Jim Grubbs DOF, State Lands Management Coordinator Katie Lewis DOF, State Lands Planning Coordinator ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 10:05a.m. Public meeting: Jim Grubbs thanked everyone for attending and explained that the purpose of this meeting was to record any comments the MPAG members may have related to the Ten-Year Resource Management Plan for Belmore State Forest and the public testimony from the previous night. The plan was reviewed section-by-section and below is a summary of the comments by topic. Introduction (Page 2) - The group discussed that information concerning the Satsuma tract addition should be discuss either in the introduction or under the land acquisition section. I.C. Goals and Objectives for the Next Ten-Year Period- Goal 4. Objective 4. (Page 7) – One member suggested that the objective be revised to read “Develop an environmental education outreach program with local schools and community groups.” II.A.5 Proximity to Other Public Resources (Page 8) – The group decided that Satsuma Tract should be removed from the list because it will be managed as part of Belmore State Forest. II.B.1 Land Acquisition Program (Page 9) – One member would like to see more information included in this section about the two hundred (200) acres of BSF partially funded by a cooperative agreement between the Department of Environmental Protection and the Florida National Guard. -It was decided by all that a statement needed to be added explaining that this management plan addresses the 8,736.71 acres of BSF purchased with Board of Trustees funds and details concerning the Satsuma Tract will be addressed in the Forest Legacy Stewardship Plan, which will be appended to the BSF management plan.

Exhibit D

II.B.3 Purpose for Acquisition (Page 9) – A member would like to have language added, below the main goals of DOF, to explain the partnership purpose with the National Guard for the Army Compatible Use Buffer (ACUB) on the 200 acres that they partially funded. II.B.5 Alternate Uses Considered (Page 10) - The issue of All-terrain Vehicle (ATV) use on BSF was discussed. MPAG members voted 3 to 1 that that ATV use should be added to this section as one of the alternate uses listed that was considered and determined not compatible. III.B.5 Endangered and Threatened Species (Page 12) – A member suggested that Exhibit G, “List of Observed Wildlife on BSF” be referenced again in this section because it contains listed species as well. -Spell out FNAI, if this is the first time it occurs in the plan. IV.A.3 Roads and Bridges (Page 14) – A member of the State Forest staff stated that this section will be updated to include recommendations and needs from the recently completed bridge survey. An updated road map (Exhibit I) that shows roads open for public use, management roads, and closed roads would also be added to this section. IV.A.5 Fire Management (Page 16) - The question was asked “are photo plots done on BSF?” Heather Venter answered that “photo plots are done every year on BSF.” Todd Knapp added “it is DOF policy to do so in order to record the progress of management on the forest.” IV.A.6.b Silvicultural Operations (Page 17) – One member thought it would be helpful to explain what “artificial regeneration” is, or give an example such as hand planting in the text for members of the general public who may read the document. IV.A.9.d Hunter and Public Access (Page 20) – A member suggested that this section be updated to include information about the Wildlife Management Area (WMA) on BSF. IV.A.9.e Law Enforcement (Page 20) - “DOF” should be changed to “FDACS, Office of Agricultural Law Enforcement Officers.” IV.C.2 (Impact of Planned Uses on Resources of the Property) Wildlife (Page 32) - One member suggested adding “the use of food plots on disturbed areas be should be evaluated” to the end of the existing paragraph. Another member added that “the importance of feeders for wildlife observation should not be overlooked.” V.A Management Summary/ Operation Infrastructure (Page 32) – The current annual budget would be updated to show the Fiscal Year 2007/08. V.B Management Needs, Priority Schedule, and Cost Estimates (Page 33) – Priority 1- It was suggested that this priority be updated to include a new objective for bridge maintenance costs based on findings from the most recent bridge survey and inspection. Priority 1- Number (5) - It was suggested that this objective be revised to read “Upgrade facilities at the Penney Farms Work Center” with a new cost estimate. Comments on the Exhibits Exhibit A (Location Map) - Suggested that it be updated to include the Satsuma Tract of BSF. Exhibit B (Optimal Boundary) - Suggested that it be updated using 2004 aerials. Exhibit E (Soils Map) – Suggested that it be revised to include soil map unit numbers inside the polygons that coincide with the names and colors of the soil types. Jim Grubbs closed the meeting by thanking everyone for participating in the Management Plan Advisory Group for the Belmore State Forest Ten-year Resource Management Plan. Meeting adjourned at 11:25a.m.

EXHIBIT E

Compliance with the Local Comprehensive Plan

Exhibit E

EXHIBIT F

Soils Map and Legend

Exhibit F

EXHIBIT G

Management Procedures for Archaeological and Historical Sites and Properties on State-Owned or Controlled Lands

Exhibit G

Management Procedures for Archaeological and Historical Sites and Properties on State-Owned or

Controlled Properties (Revised February 2007)

These procedures apply to state agencies, local governments, and non-profits that manage state-owned properties. A. General Discussion Historic resources are both archaeological sites and historic structures. Per Chapter 267, Florida Statutes, ‘Historic property’ or ‘historic resource’ means any prehistoric district, site, building, object, or other real or personal property of historical, architectural, or archaeological value, and folklife resources. These properties or resources may include, but are not limited to, monuments, memorials, Indian habitations, ceremonial sites, abandoned settlements, sunken or abandoned ships, engineering works, treasure trove, artifacts, or other objects with intrinsic historical or archaeological value, or any part thereof, relating to the history, government, and culture of the state.” B. Agency Responsibilities Per State Policy relative to historic properties, state agencies of the executive branch must allow the Division of Historical Resources (Division) the opportunity to comment on any undertakings, whether these undertakings directly involve the state agency, i.e., land management responsibilities, or the state agency has indirect jurisdiction, i.e. permitting authority, grants, etc. No state funds should be expended on the undertaking until the Division has the opportunity to review and comment on the project, permit, grant, etc. State agencies shall preserve the historic resources which are owned or controlled by the agency. Regarding proposed demolition or substantial alterations of historic properties, consultation with the Division must occur, and alternatives to demolition must be considered. State agencies must consult with Division to establish a program to location, inventory and evaluate all historic properties under ownership or controlled by the agency. C. Statutory Authority Statutory Authority and more in depth information can be found in the following: Chapter 253, F.S. – State Lands Chapter 267, F.S. – Historical Resources Chapter 872, F.S. – Offenses Concerning Dead Bodies and Graves Other helpful citations and references: Chapter 1A-32, F.A.C. – Archaeological Research Chapter 1A-44, F.A.C. – Procedures for Reporting and Determining Jurisdiction Over Unmarked Human Burials Chapter 1A-46, F.A C. – Archaeological and Historical Report Standards and Guidelines

Exhibit G

The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings D. Management Implementation Even though the Division sits on the Acquisition and Restoration Council and approves land management plans, these plans are conceptual. Specific information regarding individual projects must be submitted to the Division for review and recommendations. Managers of state lands must coordinate any land clearing or ground disturbing activities with the Division to allow for review and comment on the proposed project. Recommendations may include, but are not limited to: approval of the project as submitted, pre-testing of the project site by a certified archaeological monitor, cultural resource assessment survey by a qualified professional archaeologist, modifications to the proposed project to avoid or mitigate potential adverse effects. Projects such as additions, exterior alteration, or related new construction regarding historic structures must also be submitted to the Division of Historical Resources for review and comment by the Division’s architects. Projects involving structures fifty years of age or older, must be submitted to this agency for a significance determination. In rare cases, structures under fifty years of age may be deemed historically significant. These must be evaluated on a case by case basis. Adverse impacts to significant sites, either archaeological sites or historic buildings, must be avoided. Furthermore, managers of state property should make preparations for locating and evaluating historic resources, both archaeological sites and historic structures. E. Minimum Review Documentation Requirements In order to have a proposed project reviewed by the Division, the following information, at a minimum, must be submitted for comments and recommendations. Project Description – A detailed description of the proposed project including all related activities. For land clearing or ground disturbing activities, the depth and extent of the disturbance, use of heavy equipment, location of lay down yard, etc. For historic structures, specific details regarding rehabilitation, demolition, etc. Project Location – The exact location of the project indicated on a USGS Quadrangle map, is preferable. A management base map may be acceptable. Aerial photos indicating the exact project area as supplemental information are helpful. Photographs – Photographs of the project area are always useful. Photographs of structures are required. Description of Project Area – Note the acreage of the project, describe the present condition of project area, and any past land uses or disturbances. Description of Structures – Describe the condition and setting of each building within project area if approximately fifty years of age or older. Recorded Archaeological Sites or Historic Structures – Provide Florida Master Site File numbers for all recorded historic resources within or adjacent to the project area. This information should be in the current management plan; however, it can be obtained by contacting the Florida Master Site File at (850) 245-6440 or Suncom 205-6440.

* * *

Exhibit G

Questions relating to the treatment of archaeological and historic resources on state lands should be directed to: Susan M. Harp Historic Preservation Planner Division of Historical Resources Bureau of Historic Preservation Compliance and Review Section R. A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 Phone: (850) 245-6333 Suncom: 205-6333 Fax: (850) 245-6438

EXHIBIT H

Wildlife Species List

Exhibit H

LIST OF WILDLIFE SPECIES FOUND ON BELMORE STATE FOREST

Compiled By: Heather Venter

Legend: * = Federally Listed; Bold = state listed species; SSC = species of special concern; T = threatened

Mammals:

Marsupials Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana

Armadillos Nine- banded Armadillo Dasypus novemcintus Moles and Shrews Southern Short-tailed Shrew Blarina carolinensis Least Shrew Cyptotis parva Eastern Mole Scalopus aquaticus

Bats Evening Bat Nycticeius humeralis Seminole Bat Lasiurus seminolus Red Bat Lasiurus borealis

Rabbits Eastern Cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus

Marsh Rabbit Sylvilagus palustris Rodents Gray Squirrel Sciurus carolinensis Southern Flying Squirrel Glaucomys volans Sherman’s Fox Squirrel*SSC Sciurus niger shermani Cotton Mouse Peromyscus gossypinus Cotton Rat Sigmodon hispidus Carnivores Raccoon Procyon lotor Striped Skunk Mephitis mephitis Florida Black Bear* T Ursus americanus floridanus Hooved Mammals White-tailed Deer Odocoileus virginianus Wild Hog Sus scrofa Birds:

Songbirds Northern Mockingbird Mimus polyglottos Brown Thrasher Toxostoma rufum Northern Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura Common Ground Dove Columbina passerina

Birds con’t:

Blue Jay Cyanocitta cristata Carolina Wren Thryothorus ludovicianus Blue-Gray Knatcatcher Polioptila caerulea Eastern Towhee Pipilo erthrophthalmus Eastern Phoebe Sayornis phoebe Tufted Titmouse Baeolophus bicolor Galliformes Northern Bobwhite Colinus virginianus Wild Turkey Meleagris gallopavo Birds of Prey Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis Red-shoulder Hawk Buteo lineatus Coopers Hawk Accipiter cooperii Eastern Screech Owl Otis asio

Reptiles and Amphibians: Frogs and Toads Green Tree Frog Hyla cinerea Oak Toad Bufo quercicus Alligators American Alligator*SSC Alligator mississippiensis Turtles and Tortoises Gopher Tortoise*T Gopherus polyphemus Venomous Snakes Eastern Cottonmouth Agkistrodon piscivorus Eastern Diamondback Crotalus adamanteus Dusky Pygmy Rattlesnake Sistrurus miliarius barbouri Non-venomous Snakes Eastern Coachwhip Masticophis flagellum flagellum Black Racer Coluber constrictor Eastern Indigo*T Drymarchon corias couperi Lizards Green Anole Anolis carolinensis Southern Fence Lizard Sceloporus undulatus undulatus Ground Skink Scincella lateralis

Exhibit H

EXHIBIT I

FNAI Managed Area Tracking Record

Exhibit I

EXHIBIT J

Road Map

Exhibit J

EXHIBIT K

Planned and Existing Facilities

Exhibit K

EXHIBIT L

FNAI Ecological Communities Map

Exhibit L

Exhibit K

Exh

ibit

L