Upload
ngotuyen
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 0
© WZL/IPT
© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Exercise Quality Management
07 Quality Management in the Early Phases –
Focus Product
Dipl.-Ing. Dipl. Wirt.-Ing. Björn Falk
Dipl.-Ing. Dipl. Wirt.-Ing. Björn Falk
Group Perceived Quality & Product Value Management
Department Quality Management
Chair of Metrology and Quality Management
Steinbachstr. 25 (ADITEC), D-52074 Aachen,
Tel.: +49 (0)241 80-27667
Fax: +49 (0)241 80-22193
Email: [email protected]
URL: http://www.wzl.rwth-aachen.de
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 1
© WZL/IPT
Seite 1© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Customer Statements - Examples
� quiet solid
� fragile cover
� reliable affecting device
� cut off connections or the refusal of the commands are only two follows of its pettish attitude
� I once switched it on in the cinema and I nearly went blind
� disoriented software
� good gadget, good freaky functions
� dull sound
� distorted sound
� spongy keyboard
� weak keyboard
� it does not sound strange when you squeeze it, not like it couldbe damaged easily
� after the first downthrow the display went crazy and you could not use it any longer
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 2
© WZL/IPT
Seite 2© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Identification of Critical Customer Requirements
Customers Need
Specific Measurable CriteriumCustomers ExpectationsReal Customer Statements
�All required packages/ patches
contained in the installation file.
�Software is 100% compatible to
customers IT-System.
�The software doesn‘t work the way
the salesman has promised.
�These Software doesn‘t work
properly.
�No further choices to be made on a (telephone) menu.
�Customer is connected to the
responsible serviceman within 30
sec.
�Wants to speak to a serviceman.� I‘ll talk to the serviceman right now.
I won‘t accept waiting any longer.
�Chainsaw starts with second pull of
the starter rope.
�Chainsaw starts with a power of
XY N pulling on the rope.
�Want to start the chainsaw fast.�The chainsaw shall be easy to start.
�The rope shall be pullable with less
power.
Voice of Customer (VOC)Critical Customer Requirement
(CCR)
Identification of critical Customer Requirements
The translation of the customers voice into measurable specific product characteristics is essential for product development.
For customer oriented development the critical characteristics have to be identified and target values to be defined.
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 3
© WZL/IPT
Seite 3© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Kano-Model
Fulfilment of requirements
Quality and performance
requirementes
e.g.
low fuel consumption
e.g. dynamic Navigation system
Requirements for
exciting characteristics
Basic requirements
e.g. Airbags
Cu
sto
me
rs
ati
sfa
cti
on
Tim
e
Indifferent quality characteristics
Reverse quality
characteristics
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 4
© WZL/IPT
Seite 4© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Determination of Product Characteristics which delight
� Characteristics:
– The product characteristics are valuable for the customer
– They are unknown to the customer.
� Determination:
– Careful choice of target groups (Interviews with single
persons or small groups)
– The specific topics are mostly unknown
– Essential are:
� Open minded users who can imagine to use alternative
services, products or a combination of both. (extern)
� creative engineers with a strong comprehension of
feasible concepts. (intern)
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 5
© WZL/IPT
Seite 5© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Application of the Kano-Model: Determination of Critical CustomerRequirements (CCR)
� Field of application:
– Determination which products or services are (not) esteemed
by the customer.
– Validation of critical customer requirements.
� Approach:
– Specific questioning of the customer regarding special
characteristics or requirements
� Assessment of the fulfillment of a requirement
� Assessment of the non-fulfillment of a requirement
– Structuring the statements into:
� Delightment („I‘m loving it“)
� Expectation („That goes without saying!“)
� Indifference („I‘m not sure“)
� Dislike („I don‘t like it“)
Tim
e
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 6
© WZL/IPT
Seite 6© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
dislike
indiffer
ence
Expect.
delight
fulfilm
en
t
dislikeindiffer
ence
expecta
tion
delight
Non-fulfilment
Application of the Kano-Model
� Characteristic which delight the customer
� Quality- and Performance characteristic/ requirement
� Basic characteristic/ must-be requirement
� Quality Characteristic with potential for improving through substitution by other characteristics.
� „Bad idea“ or reason for dissatisfaction with the product.
� Customer statement is inappropriate.
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 7
© WZL/IPT
Seite 7© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
dislike
indifference
expect
delight
Fu
lfilme
nt
dislike
indifference
expect
delightg
Non-fulfilment
Application of the Kano Model – An Example
� Time until pizza is delivered:
� Question: Less than 30 min.?
� Answer: That's normal.
� Question: More than 30 min.?
� Answer: That's not acceptable.
– A waiting time of more than 30 min. will not be accepted.
� Question: Less than 15 minutes?
� Answer: I‘ll be delighted.
� Question: More than 15 min.?
� Answer: That's normal.
– A waiting time of less than 15 min is a characteristic which delights the customer.
� To be evaluated:
– How is the influence on costs if characteristic is realized.
– Is the market attractiveness high enough under consideration of monetary matters?dislike
indifference
expect
delight
Erfü
llun
g
dislikeindifference
expectdelightg
Nichterfüllung
1
2
1
2
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 8
© WZL/IPT
Seite 8© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Determination ofCustomer Requirements
1
Correlationsbetween different
Quality Characteristics
3
Assessing the correlationbetween Customer Requirements
and Quality Characteristics
4
House of Quality - Procedure
What?
Selection of importantQuality Characteristics
2
How?
Ranking theQuality Characteristics
5
How much?
Derivate new target valuesand other figures
6
Why?
House of Quality – Procedure:
1. Determination of Customer Requirements (What?)
2. Selection of important Quality Characteristics (How?)
3. Correlations of the different Quality Characteristics
4. Assessing the correlation between Production Requirements and Quality Characteristics
5. Ranking the Quality Characteristics (How much?)
6. Derivate new target values and other figures (Why?)
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 9
© WZL/IPT
Seite 9© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Four phases after ASI - American Supplier Institute
closing force [Fs]
extruder speed [n]
controller
pressing pressure [pd]
Easy-to-close doors
10N
Product planning
. . .
Extrusion pressure
30
Process planning
. . .
Extruder speed [n]
250
Production planning
. . .
Closing force [Fs]
7
Sealing
N
mm²
Component planning
. . .
1
min
Clo
sin
g forc
e [
Fs]
Pre
ssin
g p
ressure
[pd]
Extr
uder
speed [n]
Contr
olle
r
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 10
© WZL/IPT
Seite 10© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
1 6. .
CR: Customer Requirements
QC: Quality Characteristics
Customer Requirements
Directionof improvement
Quality
Characteristics
2
Correlation
between
CR and QC
4
5
Cu
sto
me
re
va
lua
tio
n
Be
nch
ma
rkin
g(C
usto
me
r
vie
w)
Benchmarking(Technical
view)
6
6
6Steps for developing a
House of Quality
House of Quality - Structure
Imp
ort
an
ce
Cu
sto
me
rR
eq
uir
em
en
ts1
Important quality
characteristics
Correlation
3
Techn. difficulty
Techn. evaluation
QFD - Quality Function Deployment
House of Quality – Structure:
Today the House of Quality is one of the most commonly used tools for implementing Quality Function Deployment, providing a combination of various matrices, lists and tables, to support the individual transformation steps in QFD process. The conversion of Customer Requirements into Quality Characteristics is supported and evaluated by using weighted relations to link the contents of the various matrices and tables.
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 11
© WZL/IPT
Seite 11© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
� The tyre should be rain capable� The tyre should have good emergency running properties
� The tyre shouldn‘t cause too much noise� The tyre should provide low fuel consumption
� The tyre should have a high durability
� The tyre should have a sportive handling
Determination of Customer Requirements
Customer Requirements:
Application of the QFD Method
Determination of Customer Requirements:
The QFD Method will be used for designing a car tyre. At first a primary investigation in form of a survey is accomplished.
The exemplary results of a survey are shown above.
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 12
© WZL/IPT
Seite 12© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Pair wise Comparison
...
...
...
requirement B
requirement A
Customer Requirements
0
req
uir
em
en
tA
2
req
uir
em
en
tB
we
igh
tG
i
su
mS
i
...
„A“ more important than „B“
inscribe „2“
Matrix field for inscription
of the lines summation.
„B“ less important than „A“
inscribe „0“
Pair-wise comparison
At first the QFD weightings are determined with a pair wise comparison of all requirements which have resulted from the survey. In the following all Customer Requirements in the matrix are compared with each other.
If a Customer Requirement (e.g. “A” from line 1) is more important than the other requirement in the pair (“B” from column 2), a “2” has to be inscribed in the appropriate matrix array. In case of the same importance a “1”, in case of less importance a “0” has to be inscribed.
To get the weighted Customer Requirements use the following formulas:
for a range of 1 to 5
for a range of 1 to 10
Wi : weight; Si : sum of correlating line; Smax : maximum line sum;
Smin : minimum line sum
Last but not least the weighted Customer Requirements are inscribed into the House of Quality.
+
−
−⋅= 14
minmax
min
SS
SSRdW i
i
+
−
−⋅= 19
minmax
min
SS
SSRdW i
i
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 13
© WZL/IPT
Seite 13© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Exercise: Pair wise Comparison
A customer survey provides the following information to you:
� The tyres‘ rain capability is more important than low noise emission or low fuel
consumption as well as the other requirements.
� The good emergency running capabilities are as same important as high speed capability
and a sportive handling but are less important than a high durability.
� Just the rain capability is more important than a low fuel consumption.
� Low noise emission is more important than good emergency running capabilities, a
sportive handling and high speed capability but less important than the other
requirements.
� High durability is as same important as sportive handling and more important than the
high speed capability.
� Sportive handling and high speed capability are of the same importance.
Calculate the weight of each customer requirement by the use of the pair wise comparison.
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 14
© WZL/IPT
Seite 14© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Excercise: Comparison in Pairs
high-speed capable
low fuel consuption
low noise
good emergency running properties
rain capable
customer requirements rain
ca
pa
ble
go
od
em
erg
en
cy
run
nin
gp
rop
ert
ies
low
no
ise
low
fuelco
nsu
ptio
n
hig
h-s
pe
ed
ca
pa
ble
hig
h d
ura
bili
ty
we
igh
tW
i
su
mS
i
high durability
sportive handling
sp
ort
ive
ha
nd
ling
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
2
0
2
0
2
2
2
1
2
2
10
6
2
12
1
4
3
1
5
0
2
0
0
2
00 2 2 2 7 3
00 1 0 1 3 11
1
2
2
1
2
1
Smax= 12
Smin= 2
Smax - Smin= 10
Rd(4x(4/10)+1)
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 15
© WZL/IPT
Seite 15© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
House of Quality – car tyre
Strong Correlation
Medium Correlation
Weak Correlation
= 9
= 3
= 1
Ccusto
mer
Evalu
ation
Customer Requirements
Importance tr
ead
patt
ern
nylo
noverl
ays
ste
elb
elt
fabric
layer
inn
er
layer
sid
efr
am
e
core
pro
file
core
chip
per
rain capable 5
1 2 3 4 5 6
good emergency runningproperties
1
low noise 3
low fuel consumption 4
high-speed capable 1
high durability 3
sportive handling 1
1234
56
118 9 57 18 30 46 12 37 12
10 1 5 2 3 4 1 3 1
Target Values
Absolute Importance
Importance 1-10
Technical Evaluation
Com
pon
ents
Strong Positive
Positive
Negative
Strong Negative
+++-
Directionof Improvement
Maximum
Neutral
Minimum
Product B
Product A
Benchmarking
- Customer Evaluation- Technical Evaluation
--
Case study “car tyre”: Completely elaborated House of Quality
The picture shows the QFD on the production level by the example of a car tyre. The proceeding differs from the ASI concept and shows that the QFD works as a flexible instrument.
In the first House of Quality (HoQ) of this example it is not possible to name target values because the components can’t be defined in physical values. Therefore it is not possible to identify the direction of improvement and to sign in the matrix of the rooftop.
This HoQ analyses the influence of Customer Requirements on the product components.
Example – Planning of Components
The HoQ of the car tyre shows that the technical parameter “tread pattern” is related to most of the Customer Requirements. Now this parameter will be shown in detail.
The detailed view could also have been achieved in the very first HoQ, but then it wouldn’t have been that clearly arranged. It has to be decided individually which procedure is suited best regarding time, profit and usage.
The HoQ concerning the tread pattern offers the possibility to plot the target values, the direction of improvement and the matrix of the rooftop.
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 16
© WZL/IPT
Seite 16© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Quality Characteristics of the component “tread pattern”
� cap-material: % silica
� cap-material: % flexibiliser
� cap-profile: share of negative tread (profile)
� cap-profil: profile depth
� base: density
� base: hardness
� shoulder: angle
� shoulder: hardness
� ...
Quality Characteristics:
Identification of Quality Characteristics (QC)
In the following work step the Quality Characteristics of the tread pattern will be identified. They represent measurable criteria for the fulfilment of the Customer Requirements and can be used for the technical implementation.
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 17
© WZL/IPT
Seite 17© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Rooftop Matrix
custo
mer
evalu
atio
n
cap base shoulder
material profil
customer requirements
importance
% s
ilica
% f
lexi
bili
ser
quota
of
tread
deepe
nin
gs
tread d
epth
de
nsety
hard
ness
angle
hard
ness
custo
mer
evalu
atio
n
rain capable 5
1 2 3 4 5 6
good emergency running
prosperties1
low noise 3
low fuel consumption 4
high-speed capable 1
high durability 3
sportive handling 1
15% 10% 7% 6mm0,8
kg/dm3
90o
Shore A10o 85
o
Shore A
12
3456
69 75 94 78 51 43 6 10
7 8 10 8 6 5 1 1
technical evaluations
target values
absolute importance
importance 1-10
- - + +
qualit
y -
chara
cte
ristics
shouldermaterial profile
cap base
% s
ilica
% f
lexib
ilise
r
Qu
ota
of
tre
ad
de
ep
en
ing
s
tre
ad
de
pth
de
nsity
ha
rdn
ess
an
gle
ha
rdn
ess
- - + +
Rooftop Matrix
The Rooftop Matrix is used for the identification of interactions between the various Quality Characteristics.
These can be of different characteristic:
- Strong Positiv interaction ++
- Positiv interaction +
- Neutral no inscription
- Negative interaction -
- Strong negative interaction --
Example:
Silica and flexibiliser are both parts of the cap material. The procentual quota of the flexibiliser should stay the same but the quota of silica should be raised. Because the material is a mixture of both a procentualchange of one part influences the quota of the other part which means there is a strong negative interaction (shown by - -).
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 18
© WZL/IPT
Seite 18© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Correlation Matrix
custo
mer
evalu
atio
n
cap base shoulder
material profil
customer requirements
importance
% s
ilica
% f
lexi
bili
ser
quota
of
tread
deepe
nin
gs
tread
depth
de
nsety
hard
ness
angle
hard
ness
custo
mer
evalu
atio
n
rain capable 5
1 2 3 4 5 6
good emergency running
prosperties1
low noise 3
low fuel consumption 4
high-speed capable 1
high durability 3
sportive handling 1
15% 10% 7% 6mm0,8
kg/dm390
o
Shore A10
o 85o
Shore A
1
2
34
56
69 75 94 78 51 43 6 10
7 8 10 8 6 5 1 1
technical evaluations
target values
absolute importance
importance 1-10
- - + +
+qualit
y-
chara
cte
ristics
Customer requirements
importance
% s
ilica
% f
lexib
iliser
quota
of
tread
deepenin
gs
tread
depth
densety
hard
ness
angle
hard
ness
rain capable 5
good emergency runningproperties 1
low noise 3
low fuel consumption 4
high-speed capable 1
high durability 3
sportive handling 1
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Absolute importance
Importance 1-10Q
ualit
y
chara
cte
ristics
5 x + 3 x + 4 x + 3 x =
5 x 9 + 3 x 1 + 4 x 3 + 3 x 3 = 69
69 75 94 78 51 43 6 107 8 10 8 6 5 1 1
Symbols are used for documenting the correlation between Customer Requirements and Quality Characteristics in the matrix. Three intensity levels are distinguished when using the tabular description.
A circle with a dot in the middle represents for a very strong correlation. For the calculation of the characteristic importance a numeric value of 9 is used.
A medium strong correlation is represented by simple circles (value: 3).
Triangles are used to point out a weak correlation (value: 1).
Usually the correlations are determined during a discussion of experts from all concerned business divisions like design, planning, construction, manufacturing, assembly and quality assurance. According to that only a relatively rough gradation can be used when evaluating the correlations. The term “intensity of correlation” is comparable to the same term, which is used in the fields of statistics.
Than the absolute and the relative importance can be calculated. The absolute importance is calculated by summing up the product of the weight and the value of correlation within a column. The relative importance can be calculated analogue to the calculation of the weight used for the pair wise comparison. (See next page)
Exercise: Calculate the absolute and relative importance of the quality characteristics.
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 19
© WZL/IPT
Seite 19© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
This page stays empty for technical reasons
A strong correlation exists, if the change of a Quality Characteristic leads to a systematic change of the customer satisfaction (in the sense of the fulfilment of a certain Customer Requirement).
The algorithm for calculating the absolute importance of Quality Characteristics can be described as the following:
Importance of the first Customer Requirement (CR#1) multiplied with the correlation to the first Quality Characteristic (QC#1) plus the importance of CR#2 multiplied with the correlation to QC#1 plus CR#3 x QC#1 plus .... This proceeding has to be repeated for every column (quality characteristic).
The relative importance is calculated analogue to the pair wise comparison :
i = column j = row
Gj = weight of Customer Requirement
Bij = strength of correlation with Quality Chrateristic
for a range of 1 to 5
for a range of 1 to 10
Wi : weighting; Si : sum of correlating line; Smax : maximum line sum;
Smin : minimum line sum
+
−
−⋅= 19
minmax
min
AA
AARdW i
i
+
−
−⋅= 14
minmax
min
AA
AARdW i
i
( )ij
n
j
ji BGA ⋅=∑=1
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 20
© WZL/IPT
Seite 20© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Benchmark - customer evaluation
- - + +
+
custo
mer
evalu
atio
n
cap base shoulder
material profil
customer requirements
importance
% s
ilica
% f
lexi
bili
ser
quota
of
tread
deepe
nin
gs
tread
depth
de
nsety
hard
ness
angle
hard
ness
custo
mer
evalu
atio
n
rain capable 5
1 2 3 4 5 6
good emergency running
prosperties1
low noise 3
low fuel consumption 4
high-speed capable 1
high durability 3
sportive handling 1
15% 10% 7% 6mm0,8
kg/dm3
90o
Shore A10
o 85o
Shore A
12
345
669 75 94 78 51 43 6 10
7 8 10 8 6 5 1 1
technical evaluations
target values
absolute importance
importance 1-10
Customer Requirements
Importance C
usto
mer
evalu
ation
rain capable 5 ... 1 2 3 4 5 6
good emergency runningproperties 1 ...
low noise 3 ...
low fuel consumption 4 ...
high-speed capable 1 ...
high durability 3 ...
sportive handling 1 ...
Benchmark Customer View – Technical View
An additional goal of using QFD in product planning is to determine target values for a detailed development. For this purpose the Quality Characteristics and the Customer Requirements have to be analysed accurately by regarding realisation aspects and their respective market potential.
The way which is usually taken to find out a solution is to compare products directly (benchmarking) and to survey customers about how the regarded products fulfil their requirements.
So the HoQ has to be completed by a customer based and a technical based comparison. Such comparisons in QFD mostly use an integer scale from 1 (“particularly well“ resp. “fulfilled“) to 6 (“particularly bad“ resp. “not fulfilled“). The results of a customer survey and a technical comparison are displayed above and on the following page.
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 21
© WZL/IPT
Seite 21© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Benchmark - technical evaluation
custo
mer
evalu
atio
n
cap base shoulder
material profil
customer requirements
importance
% s
ilica
% f
lexi
bili
ser
quota
of
tread
deepe
nin
gs
tread
depth
de
nsety
hard
ness
angle
hard
ness
custo
mer
evalu
atio
n
rain capable 5
1 2 3 4 5 6
good emergency running
prosperties1
low noise 3
low fuel consumption 4
high-speed capable 1
high durability 3
sportive handling 1
15% 10% 7% 6mm0,8
kg/dm390
o
Shore A10
o 85o
Shore A
1
2
34
56
69 75 94 78 51 43 6 10
7 8 10 8 6 5 1 1
technical evaluations
target values
absolute importance
importance 1-10
- - + +
+qualit
y-
chara
cte
ristics
cap base shoulder
material profil
% s
ilica
% f
lexib
ilise
r
qu
ota
of
tre
ad
de
ep
en
ing
s
tre
ad
de
pth
de
nsity
ha
rdn
ess
an
gle
ha
rdn
ess
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
15% 10% 7% 6mm0,8
kg/dm3
90o
Shore A10
o 85o
Shore A
1
2
3
4
5
6
Technical evaluation
Target values
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 22
© WZL/IPT
Seite 22© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Process planning cap – third phase (ASI)
Importance 1 - 10
Target values
8Tread depth
10Quota of tread deepenings
8% Flexibiliser
7% Silica
Absolute importance
Vulc
aniz
ing
furn
ace
Extr
uder
Ble
nder
Imp
ort
an
ce
� �
� �
� �
� �
16297135
6 1 10
Process Steps
Quality
Characteristics
Process planning
The HoQ of process planning determines the correlation between process steps and Quality Charactericsof the components.
Analogue to the very first HoQ it is not possible to set up target values or the direction of improvement. Hence filling in the rooftop matrix is not feasible.
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 23
© WZL/IPT
Seite 23© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Production planning extruder – fourth phase (ASI)
Absolute importance
Target values
8tread depth
10quota of tread deepenings
8% flexibiliser
7% silica
Direction of improvement
conveyor
belt
speed
wid
thof
die
heig
htof
die
revs
tem
pera
ture
Imp
ort
an
ce
� � �
� � �
�
� � �
80°C70/ min
15mm �
25mm/s
87 15 82 54 72
���
--
++
�
200mm
10
Importance 1 - 10 10 2 9 54 81
Setting Parameter
Quality
Characteristics
Production planning
The production planning provides the correlation between the setting parameters and the Quality Characteristics of the components. This HoQ can be filled in completely. Another thinkable possibility might be to combine the third and fourth house in only one House of Quality.
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 24
© WZL/IPT
Seite 24© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Attachments for Exercise 07
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 25
© WZL/IPT
Seite 25© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
KX
X/X
.03
1 rubber 38%
(natural- and synthetic rubber)
2 fillers 30%
(soot, silica, chalk, ...)
3 reinforcements 16%
(steel, rayon, polyester, nylon)
4 flexibiliser (oil, resin, ...) 10%
5 vulcanising materials
(sulphur, zinc oxide, ...) 4%
6 several chemicals 1%
(wax, antioxidants, ...)
7 miscellaneous 1%
Tyre materials
source: Continental AG
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 26
© WZL/IPT
Seite 26© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
KX
X/X
.03
The structure of a tyre
Cap: tread and mixture influence the characteristics
Base: cuts the rolling resistance
Nylon overlays: increase the high speed capability
Steel belt: increases the driving stability
Carcass: relevant for form and stability of the tyre
Inner layer: gas proof inner layer replaces the tube
Side frame: protects carcass against damaging and atmos-pheric influences
Core profile: used for steering precision and driving stability. Influences the comfort
Core: ensures a solid fit on the rim
Chipper: for precise steering and a high driving stability source: Continental AG
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 27
© WZL/IPT
Seite 27© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
conventional tyre
rubber/rubber-contact of the side causes a
fast destruction of the tyre.
RFT tyre
TPMS
Inserts
Insert-profiles in the side panel carry the
load in case of loss of pressure und avert
the rubber / rubber-contact.
Run Flat Tyres (RFT)
source: Continental AG
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 28
© WZL/IPT
Seite 28© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
1/2 tread pattern
3 nylon overlays
4 steel belt
synthetic- and natural rubber mixtures
Cap ensures grip, abrasion resistance, driving
stability and stopping performance
Base reduces the rolling resistance
Shoulder constitutes an optimal transition from the
tread pattern to the side panel
rubber covered nylon
ensures high speed stability
steel belt of high tensile strength
ensures form- and driving stability
reduces the rolling resistance
increases the driving performance
Tyre components and their function
source: Continental AG
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 29
© WZL/IPT
Seite 29© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
6 inner layer
Rubber covered rayon or polyester
ensures dimensional stability and averts inflation
butyl rubber mixture
ensures airproofness
nature rubber mixtures
Influences the driving comfort
protects against lateral damages
averts ageing damages (ozone, UV-radiation)
5 fabric layer
7 side frame
Tyre components and their function
source: Continental AG
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 30
© WZL/IPT
Seite 30© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
8 core profile
9 core
10 chipper
synthetic rubber mixture
ensures driving stability
increases the precision of steering
Influences the driving comfort
rubber covered steel wire
ensures tight fit on the rim
Rubber covered rayon or nylon
ensures driving stability
increases the precision of steering
ensures durability
Tyre components and their function
source: Continental AG
Quality Management – Prof. Schmitt Exercise 07
Quality Function Deployment E 07 page 31
© WZL/IPT
Seite 31© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT
Fabrication of tyres
source: Continental AG
inner layercalendering
tread pattern-extrusion
woven textilecalendering
Core winding
tread pattern-cut
layer-cut
belt-cutbead filler-
application
rubber chemicalsMixing facilities
Steel beltcalendering
side frame-extrusion
carcass-manufacture
blank-manufacture
visualinspection
uniformity measuring
heating