Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
(except logo’s)
The good, the efficient, and the open changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science
Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman Geneva Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), Geneva, June 18, 2015
@MsPhelps@jeroenbosman
Simple cyclic model of the research workflow
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing and application
Iterations of search and reading
Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments and measurements
Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow, with loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing and application
Iterations of search and reading
Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments and measurements
A multi-cyclic, multi-orderedmodel of the research workflow, with loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing and application
Iterations of search and reading
Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments and measurements
A multi-cyclic, multi-orderedmodel of the research workflow, with loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing and application
Iterations of search and reading
Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments and measurements
Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)
• declaring competing interests• replication & reproducibility• meaningful assessment• effective quality checks• credit where it is due• no fraud, plagiarism
• connected tools & platforms• no publ. size restrictions• null result publishing• speed of publication• (web)standards, IDs• semantic discovery• re-useability• versioning
open peer review •open (lab)notes •
plain language •open drafting •
open access •CC-0/BY •
good
efficient open
technical changes & standards
research governance
changes
economic & copyright
changes
researcher
funder
publisher
public
government library
good
efficient open
Ongoing discussions
researcher
funder
publisher
public
government library
2005
2010
Discovery
Analysis
WritingPublication
Out
reac
h
Assessm
ent
Changing research workflows
Open Science
Survey: scholarly communication tools
Survey: scholarly communication tools
Survey: 1st 1000 results
What is you research role? What discipline are you working in?
Survey: 1st 1000 results
64 countries1 300
Breakdown examples
What tools do you use to get access to literature etc.?
Breakdown examples
What tools do you use to archive/share data &code ?
Tool combinations in workflows
ResearchGate(share pub + researcher
profile)
SPSSLaTeX
1000
0
Distribution across Good-Efficient-Open
Good Efficient Open
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
Make these data work for you
?
Make these data work for you
Do Asian postdocs look more to impact factors to select a journal to publish in than
their Latin American counterparts?
Make these data work for you
Is sharing ‘preprints’ gaining traction beyond the fields of astronomy, physics and math, and
if so, what platforms are used?
Make these data work for you
Which tools are used in multiple research phases, and are they leading tools
in any of these phases?
Policy applications
Policy applications
“Focus shifting from ‘journals’ to individual publishable units
(articles, but also other research output)”
“Clear(er) shift towards open science / open access, leading to a diminishing importance of traditional journals”
Call to action
[Tussenslide (of transitie in slide) over custom URL?]
http://101innovations.wordpress.com
Call to action
[Tussenslide (of transitie in slide) over custom URL?]
http://101innovations.wordpress.com
custom URL
Call to action
Thank you!
