View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This report is an examination of textbooks in elementary and junior high schools of the Israeli State educational system. Issues explored include immigration to and settlement in the Land of Israel, and in two history textbooks that deal with the beginnings of Zionism but which are parts of the old curriculum.
Citation preview
IPCRI ¦ ? ² ³ £� ¥² ¨¬ù£¨ ¦ ?�² ±¡ ¨ ¦ � ©£¢ « ¦ ®
Rú???Y??å�?�Súör??�?ÉuU?z�¾ÉoåtUå�U?t?Israel/Palestine Center for Research and Information
Examination of Israeli Textbooks In
Elementary Schools of
The State Educational System
April 2004
February, 2004
Summary – Examination of Israeli textbooks in
elementary schools of the State educational system
Contents
A. Introduction 2
B. Expressions of a positive attitude toward tolerance,
pluralism, peace.
4
C. Expressions of a negative attitude toward tolerance,
pluralism, peace.
12
D. The religious, cultural, and national image of Arabs and
Palestinians.
13
E. The Israeli narrative and the Palestinian narrative.
The question of borders and Palestinian national identity.
15
F. Themes and areas in which examples could be added to
express a positive attitude toward pluralism, tolerance,
and peace, and suggestions for improvements.
21
Summary. 23
Compiled by:
Meirav Perlstein
Rona Ben Giat
Yael Ohad-Karni
Reviewed by Mazen
A. Introduction
This report is an examination of textbooks in elementary and junior high schools of
the Israeli State educational system. It is important to point out that this summary
does not constitute a comprehensive examination of the complete official curriculum,
but rather an examination of a relatively limited number of textbooks and workbooks
designed for 1st – 8th grade students.
The choice of the textbooks was random and should thus not be seen as a
representative sample.
All the books were examined according to the following criteria:
• Examples expressing a positive attitude toward tolerance, pluralism, and peace.
• Examples expressing a negative or ambiguous attitude toward tolerance,
pluralism, and peace.
• Themes / areas in which examples could be added to express a positive attitude
toward tolerance, pluralism, and peace, as well as suggestions for improvement
or change.
In addition to the above, we also examined the following issues:
• The religious, cultural, and national image of Palestinians and Arabs.
• The Palestinian national identity, and the geographical and political definition of
Palestine.
• The national Israeli narrative and how it relates to the Palestinian narrative.
The latter three issues were covered mainly by the history textbooks. However, the
history curriculum, whose aim is to structure the past and to create belongingness to
the neighborhood, community, place of residence, country, etc., begins in 1st grade by
focusing on those aspects that are closest to the child. From 6th grade onward the
history of the Jewish People does not deal with the history of the Land of Israel up to
the beginnings of Zionism – this subject is only dealt with in 9th grade. Because we
examined the books that are intended for 1st – 8th grades, the question of the national
Israeli narrative and how it relates to the Palestinian narrative is not particularly
relevant. These issues appear in the textbooks for 1st – 6th grades which deal with
immigration to and settlement in the Land of Israel, and in two history textbooks that
deal with the beginnings of Zionism but which are part of the old curriculum
(“Chapters in the history of the Yishuv [pre-state settlement] in the first villages” and
“The beginnings of Zionism”).
* Our work is based on content analysis and not on quantitative data.
We examined textbooks in the following subjects
The Bible (7 student workbooks)
Literature (6 textbooks)
Written expression and language (4 textbooks and workbooks)
Geography (A textbook and a workbook)
Civics (1 textbook. The subject is only taught in 8th grade)
History (8 textbooks)
All of the text books reviewed were first examined by Mazen Abu Aita who high
lighted problematic sections and sentences from the point of view of a Palestinian
reading the Israeli text books. The books were then reviewed and analyzed by the
IPCRI team. The following are the results of their findings:
B. Examples of a positive attitude to tolerance, pluralism, and peace
Bible studies –
The workbooks in Bible studies designed for elementary-school students in the State
educational system uses an interdisciplinary approach and includes Mishnaic and
Talmudic legends, literature, language development exercises, and discussion of
moral values.
In the discussion of moral values, as well as in the choice of homiletic interpretations,
legends and literary extracts, the emphasis, in general, is on moral values and
universal human feelings.
The Bible stories present the students with stories of the Patriarchs and the religious
and national development of the Jewish People. Despite this, the compilation of the
material in the workbooks we examined often tends to emphasize the common
elements of different peoples and religions, and of men and women.
Thus, for example, the chapter of the Genesis workbook designed for 2nd grade
students that deals with the Creation states: “When we say ‘man knows how to think’
we mean both men and women” (Genesis – Activity booklet for young learners, by
Bina Geller-Talitman and Chana Shalita, p. 8).
Later, in the context of the seventh day of the Creation, the students are asked: “To
whom was the day of rest given? Answer with the help of the clues”. The clues are
presented in drawings that depict people engaged in various tasks – a Chinese, an
Indian, a dark-skinned person, women, etc. (ibid. p. 13).
In contexts in which Ishmael is mentioned or holy places such as the Cave of
Machpelah, the students are presented with information whose content encourages
them to recognize and accept Muslim culture and religion, and emphasizes the
connection between the two religions.
In the context of the birth of Ishmael, it is stated: “The angel said that Ishmael would
create a great people, and Abraham arranged for Ishmael to be circumcised when he
was thirteen years old. The Muslims, who see themselves as descendents of Ishmael,
conduct a circumcision ceremony for boys turning thirteen” (ibid. pp. 68-69).
Concerning Sarah’s death and her burial in the Cave of Machpelah, it is stated: “The
Cave of Machpelah is a holy place for both Jews and Muslims…these days both Jews
and Muslims pray there” (ibid. p. 95, as well as in the workbook “With Joshua – a
workbook for students” by Aviva Tirosh and Bina Geller Talitman, p. 72).
In stories that deal with wars and with conflicts, emphasis is placed on the attempt to
find a peaceful solution to the conflict.
For example, emphasizing the fact that “Abraham solved the quarrel between his
shepherds and Lot’s shepherds peacefully; he suggested that they separate and he
allowed Lot first choice of where to settle”. Taking advantage of this opportunity, the
students are presented with an additional assumption that is raised in one of the stories
of the sages concerning the quarrel between the shepherds. The proposal is presented
to the students by means of a drawing and speech bubbles:
Drawing 1: Abram says: “Why are you leading Lot’s flocks into fields that do not
belong to you?”
Drawing 2: Abram says: “You are entering other people’s fields and you shouldn’t be
doing it”. (Genesis – Workbook for the student, pp. 59-61).
In the context of the story of the feud between Isaac’s shepherds and those of
Abimelech over the wells, the students are invited “to draw up the peace treaty
between Isaac and the King of Gerer”, and the writers add: “these days as well there
are treaties between people and between countries. You can see a picture of the
signing of a peace treaty”. The picture that appears is that of Rabin and Hussein at the
peace-signing ceremony between Israel and Jordan (ibid. p. 111).
In the context of the story of the flood, the dove appears with the olive branch as a
symbol of peace, together with pictures of Israeli stamps from the series “My Peace”
consisting of children’s drawings in which Arab and Jewish figures are shown holding
hands (ibid. p. 30).
In the context of the call of Avner ben-Ner (Saul’s military commander) to Joab
(David’s military commander): “Shall the sword devour for ever?” (2 Samuel 2:26),
an assignment is proposed for the students. “You have set up an organization to
prevent wars. What phrase in the chapter would you choose as a slogan?” (“With
King David – student workbook for the Second Book of Samuel”, by Aviva Tirosh
and Bina Geller Talitman, p. 25).
In all the workbooks, the suggested activities encourage the students to ask questions
and to criticize the behavior of the heroes (God included) from a moral standpoint,
both their attitude to their own people and to other peoples.
The fact is often emphasized that values or norms that were acceptable in Biblical
times are different from currently acceptable values and behavior norms.
For example, in the context of the punishment meted out to the family of the priest Eli
(1 Samuel), it is stated: “All of Eli’s family, including those not yet born, were to be
punished. How does this seem to you today? (Remember that opinions change)”.
(“With Samuel and his generation – student workbook for the First Book of Samuel”,
by Bina Geller Talitman and Aviva Tirosh, p. 25.)
On Saul’s war against the Amalekites (1 Samuel, 15), the students are asked to think
about and discuss the following: “Samuel demanded in God’s name to kill the women
and children of Israel’s historic enemy in addition to the men. What would you think
of an act like this if it were done in our times? – and the writers add, “It is interesting:
Samuel demands that all the Amalekites be killed, including women and children.
Today, killing on such a scale is known as “genocide”, which means “destroying a
nation”. According to a treaty between member states of the United Nations, genocide
is completely forbidden” (ibid. p. 101).
The teaching of the Book of Joshua, which deals almost entirely with the wars to
conquer the Land of Canaan, including the commandment to destroy the seven
Canaanite nations, is problematic from the start, especially for 4th grade students. The
writers of the workbook “With Joshua – student workbook” (Aviva Tirosh and Bina
Geller Talitman) attempt to deal with the moral problems that emerge from the
Biblical text by means of assignments that encourage moral judgment and critical
thinking, and by sharpening the distinction between what was acceptable in Biblical
times and today.
For example, in the context of the Achan episode (Joshua, 7) it is stated: “Why is the
whole Jewish people accused of sin? Is it right that the whole Jewish people should
suffer because one person sinned?…In Biblical times it was acceptable to punish a
whole family when one of its members sinned. In light of what is currently
acceptable, is it justified that Achan’s family was punished? Give reasons.” The
writers add a recommendation to the teacher: “The teacher can initiate a discussion on
society’s responsibility for the behavior of its members” (ibid. pp. 45-46).
With regard to the conquest of Ai (Joshua, 8) the students are asked: “What is your
opinion, as people living here today, of the killing of all the inhabitants of Ai by
Joshua and his army?” For their creative assignments, the students are invited to put
themselves in another person’s shoes – the enemy: “A refugee from Ai flees to
another city and writes a report for the local newspaper there. Write or record”.
Encouraging the students to identify with the suffering of the other is expressed
clearly in the context of the story of the banishment of Hagar and Ishmael (Genesis,
21). The writers invite the children to ask questions about the story or to express an
opinion about one of the characters (Sarah, Abraham, or God). A contemporary Israeli
story is also presented, “My heart is with Ishmael” by Yael Medini. Na’ama, the
speaker in the story, talks about the friendship and the love that existed between her
and Ishmael (and other children), and about the heartbreak, the tears and the pain
when he left. The writer causes the children to be very critical of Abraham and Sarah
(“Genesis – activity booklet fo r young learners”, pp. 85-88). An activity that
encourages the children to feel empathy toward Ishmael can also be found in the story
of Abraham’s death. The suggested activity: “After the funeral, Isaac and Ishmael sat
down to talk. What did they talk about? Perhaps they remembered incidents from their
childhood? Perhaps Ishmael spoke about how he felt when he and his mother were
banished?” (ibid. p. 104).
At various junctures there is emphasis on the idea that social and moral responsibility
is not limited to one’s own people.
For example, in the context of laws designed to assist the poor and the stranger
(Leviticus, 19), “Gilad asks: I don’t understand why the Torah commands us to treat
the stranger well. Sari answers: I think that it’s hard for people to treat strangers well.
Why don’t you join the discussion?” (“Exodus and Leviticus – Activity booklet for
young learners”, by Bina Geller Talitman and Chana Shalita, p. 159.)
The idea that social and moral responsibility is not limited to the People of Israel is
particularly evident in the teaching of the Book of Jonah. For example:
1. “God said to Jonah: ‘Arise, go to Nineveh’ (1:2). From this we learn that God
is responsible for all people and not only for the Jewish people… toward the
end of the story we come across the verse ‘and should not I pity Nineveh, that
great city’ (4:11). What does this teach us about how God relates to human
beings?”
2. In the context of comparing Jonah’s behavior to that of the sailors (who were
not Jews) during the storm at sea, the legend is presented from Pirkei d’Rabbi
Eliezer, who elaborates and emphasizes the many attempts made by the sailors
to avoid throwing Jonah into the sea. In light of the legend, the students are
asked: “How does the legend strengthen and emphasize the human and moral
behavior of the sailors?”
3. The context: The sins of the people of Nineveh and God’s moral demands of
all the nations.
”The following legends are found in the Talmud; read them. Legend A –
While the people of Israel were crossing the sea, the ministering angels asked
them to sing to the Almighty, and the Almighty said to them: you are
drowning because of my actions and you sing to me? Legend B – The
Almighty rejects no one, he accepts everyone, the twenty (gates of repentance)
are always open, and anyone who wishes to enter may do so. Legend C –
Elijah said, “I am sure that the spirit of holiness can be found in everything
that takes place between Israelite and stranger, between man and woman,
between slave and handmaiden.”
Among the questions asked in light of the legends: “How in Legend B is the
idea expressed that all people are equal”, and “it can be said that Legend C
provides an explanation and justification for anyone opposed to racialism and
discrimination. How?”
4. Summary exercise on the Book of Jonah – the students are asked to bring
examples of the major issues they dealt with in studying the Book of Jonah:
”Is there any basis for the belief that people are capable of changing?” “Are
there moral values that the nations of the world hold in common?” “Can
human society exist only with laws or only with compassion?” (Workbook on
the books of the prophets Jonah, and Amos”, by Bina Geller Talitman and
Rachel Nechemkin.)
Pluralism – In the literature, written expression and geography elementary school
textbooks that we examined, the general trend was a positive attitude toward “the
other”.
The trend is to emphasize pluralism in relation to “the other” in various countries:
China, Greece, Japan, Nigeria, as well as through stories from diverse ethnic
communities.
For example, from a story about Martians: “People from different places in the world
are really the same, even on Mars”. (New Israel Anthology, Book F, p. 153.) The
approach to common human characteristics in all places is complex, both regarding
positive characteristics such as wisdom and attentiveness, as well as negative
characteristics such as the herd instinct, a tendency not to offer assistance, etc. For
example, Shofman: “People don’t tend toward pluralism”.
Regarding festivals, only Jewish festivals are considered and not those of other
groups. Also, concerning the Memorial Day for fallen soldiers of the Israel Defense
Forces, it is stated: “All Israel’s citizens remember the fallen and talk about their
bravery” (“Through words, Book B, p. 103). No mention is made of Arab citizens.
The history textbooks we examined reveal a basically pluralistic attitude toward
ethnic, national, and religious groups. The books, texts, and student assignments
recognize the rights of various groups to maintain the lifestyle they are familiar with
and to which they aspire, and to preserve their tradition and uniqueness. However, in
view of the fact that these textbooks are designed for students in Jewish State-
education elementary schools, they deal predominantly with the history of the Jewish
People, with Zionism, and with Jewish settlement in the Land of Israel.
The attitude of the Muslims to the Jews during the period of the Muslim empires is
described as a considerate attitude to Judaism as a religion and as a community. It is
emphasized that Jews obtained recognition as a separate but not humiliated religious-
ethnic group in Muslim society of the Middle Ages and during the Ottoman Period.
For example, the relationship between Jews and Muslims is better than that between
Muslims and Christians. A textbook dealing with the socio-demographic structure of
Jerusalem, includes the different lifestyles found in the city, and relates positively to
the three monotheistic religions. For example, a student assignment encourages the
students to become familiar with the three houses of worship of the different religions
(synagogue, mosque, and church).
1) Page 149 – A whole chapter is devoted to Christianity, including the story of the
life of Jesus, the relationship between Jesus and the Jewish population, quotations
from the New Testament, such as “The Sermon on the Mount”, including sentences
such as: “Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate
you.”
2) Page 152 – Only in the second half of the twentieth century did the Christian
Church decide to renounce the blame placed on the Jewish People for Jesus’
crucifixion.
3) “The new religion opened its doors to everyone…”, p. 154.
4) Details of the theological characteristics of Christianity, including extensive details
of the texts, the sacraments and the organization of the Church.
The attitude to the Palestinian Arabs in the Land of Israel during the initial
immigrations is rarely described as positive, yet these positive descriptions should be
mentioned.
An infrequent example is the representation of the Palestinian Arab as an intellectual
with an academic profession. A well-known Arab doctor living in Jaffa treats people
who contracted diseases in the Petach Tikva swamps (p. 35).
There are also a few photographs of Palestinian notables, contrary to their image in
most references as simple, uncultured, and poor. For example, a photograph of Arab
notables in traditional dress (p. 50).
In the map on page 31, there are no Jewish settlements, which is evidence of
recognition of the presence of Arabs in the Land of Israel before Zionism, and that the
importance of Arab settlement is not negated.
A further expression of a pluralistic position is that of the pictures on pages 56 and 57
in which children appear with skullcaps, while in other pictures they appear without
skullcaps (see also page 62).
The attitude to gender is part of the pluralistic liberal approach, and should be
considered here.
In the literature the two sexes are dealt with on the basis of equality. A textbook in 2nd
grade shows a man and a women both wearing aprons. Also in a story in which Jews
invite Bedouins to visit them, and the Jewish woman is asked to greet them (Through
words, Book B, p. 142).
Part of the history curriculum deals with the growing status of women from the
beginning of the 20th century, including the Land of Israel and particularly the
agricultural settlements,. The study of European liberal political movements also
confronts the students with the gender issue and is important in formulating the
students’ attitudes. While we would expect some mention of the status of Jewish
women or Arab women in traditional society, this issue is not dealt with. In fact there
also appears to be a certain disregard of the status of women in the history of Zionist
settlement in the Land of Israel, for besides photographs of pioneer women working
in agriculture, not a single female labor leader or Zionist leader is mentioned.
Peace and reconciliation – The literature and written expression curriculums tend to
emphasize the values of peace and reconciliation. Ideas about reconciliation are
diverse:
Viewing events from different viewpoints. Thus, for example, seeing the story of
Little Red Riding Hood or the Three Pigs from the wolf’s viewpoint raises the
possibility of different narratives of the same event. The story appears in the 7th grade
anthology and it also prepares the ground for the possibility of seeing different
narratives of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Dialogue and listening. The statement that “wisdom lies in the children” (An
assortment for 7th grade, p. 155) teaches the idea of listening with an open mind to
everyone, and not only to experts. Or the insightful distinction between permitted
feelings of ha te and envy and forbidden behaviors such as violence, the solution being
a dialogue of speaking and listening. This is what happens in the story of Joseph’s
brothers (Through words, Book 2, p. 28).
Unification as a solution to conflict. In the story of the Galilee Arabs – how the kadi
judged between the warring factions, the Dan, the Hazbani, and the Banias rivers and
made them into one river. That is to say, unification can solve quarrels. The story is
presented as a metaphor of the Days of Awe as days of forgiveness (Through words,
Book E, p. 150).
Doing things together. A 6th grade textbook talks about an encounter between a
Jewish boy, Uri, and an Arab boy, Sami, which begins in an atmosphere of fear, but
afterwards Uri tells Sami that his father was killed in war, and Sami, who was
expelled from his village, covers Uri so that he won’t be cold when he goes to sleep.
In some of the history textbooks it is mentioned that when the Jews started buying
land in the Land of Israel their policy was to be considerate toward the Arabs. For
example, Arthur Ruppin showed consideration to the villagers by not buying land for
Jewish settlement too close to the Arab settlements.
Page 252: “Ruppin did not content himself with establishing Degania. As the person
responsible for Zionist settlement in the country, he took care of buying land that was
put up for sale. He specially tried to buy land located far from Arab settlements,
preferring swamps and sand dunes so as not to incur the envy of the Arab inhabitants.
He also gave the Arabs permission to continue drawing water from the springs in
areas that he bought, and hoped, through this gesture, to maintain good neighborly
relations…”
War and peace. The main message is that wars only lead to pain and disrupt the
continuity of life. The stories about wars are not militant, but rather express sadness.
In the 2nd grade written expression booklet, the message of the story “My father is a
soldier” is that it really isn’t admirable that the father is a soldier…
Or the shocking story in a 7th grade textbook of attempts to survive in the Holocaust,
in which there is no hatred toward the Germans nor even toward the Nazis. This is
also the case with stories dealing with struggle and memory in which there is pain,
sadness and comradeship, but no hatred. In the stories, the person who confronts us as
an enemy is a person who feels and hurts just as we do.
“There are victories and there are defeats, but peace depends on you” (Through
words, Book E, p. 234).
C. Examples expressing an ambiguous or negative attitude to pluralism,
tolerance, and peace.
In general we found few instances of an ambiguous or negative attitude. More
noticeable is the situation where no position is taken.
The Bible
The Bible textbooks contain isolated examples of statements or suggested activities
that express a negative or ambiguous attitude toward tolerance, pluralism and peace
(despite the fact that the Biblical text itself contains not a few examples of this kind,
and as we saw in these cases, the students are encouraged to think about them
critically and to judge them on moral grounds).
The examples that we found appear in the booklet “With King David – a student
workbook on the Second Book of Samuel” by Aviva Tirosh and Bina Geller
Talitman.
1. A song of praise was composed to celebrate David’s conquest of
Jerusalem, written by one of the king’s writers” (p. 43).
2. In the context of Chapter 8, a summary of David’s wars, the workbook
contains a map showing the areas of the kingdom that were conquered.
David’s wars were not wars of liberation, but rather wars of conquest
to expand borders. This distinction is lacking. Furthermore, the
following sentence appears in the summary: “David’s wars brought the
nation peace and security” (pp. 51-52).
Expressions of a negative or ambiguous attitude to tolerance are detailed below in the
various school subjects, and especially history, because the other subjects do not
specifically relate to Palestinians, and in general the attitude to foreigners is liberal.
D. The image of the Palestinian in Israeli textbooks.
In textbooks on the Bible, the Palestinian does not appear – see our comments in the
introduction regarding this understandable absence.
In the textbooks on the Bible, the concept “Arab” or Muslim appears in the religious
and not the Palestinian context. The places holy to Islam appear in the context of the
Cave of Machpelah but not in connection to other places.
In the literature and written expression textbooks we examined, no particular attention
was given to the image of the Palestinian, but rather to those who are different. The
“other” in a social or ethnic context is perceived as being on the border of the exotic,
as in stories about Chinese or Japanese, or has a gender emphasis as a woman, or is a
disabled person, etc.
In the history textbooks we examined, the dominant image of the Palestinian is the
traditional appellation “the Arab”. In general: The image of the Palestinian is that of a
religious person, connected to and closely identified with the holy places in the Land
of Israel.
The central image is that of a farmer, or a fallach in Arabic, as opposed to the Zionist-
Israeli who is described as an agriculturalist.
For example, “Journey to the kibbutz”, p. 12, question 4, the map clarifies who lives
in Nazareth and Jaffa, whether Jews or non-Jews, and the names of the settlements in
which non-Jews live.
The Palestinian knows about and loves working the land, and in certain periods is
described as being more proficient in this work than the Jews who came from Europe.
The Palestinian knows how to handle weapons, and how to ride a horse. On the one
hand this is a positive image, because he is independent and knows how to defend
himself, as opposed to the Diaspora Jew, but on the other hand he sometimes uses this
weapon against his Jewish neighbors, especially in order to steal from them.
It is appropriate in this context to point to the negative implication of the term “Arab
work” which is related to the Arabs – Palestinians – as menial laborers. The
Palestinian was considered as a good worker in the [Jewish] villages in the days of the
First Immigration.
Page 40: Today only Arabs work Israeli land. Work on the land is work for Arabs –
the mother says to the father. Together with this, reservations are expressed about the
fact that Arabs plant trees in Herzl Forest, which detracts from the dignity of the
visionary of the Jewish state.
A distinction is made between “Hebrew” work and “Arab” work, and the following
quotation reveals the intention: “The Jews are struggling to meet [the challenge] of
work and defense, Hebrew hands will build the land and not Arab hands” p. 66. Also
on pages 62-63, the following dialogue appears: “And who is working in the fields?”
“Arabs”, “And what are the Jews doing?” “Managing the work, supervising”, “I am
shocked. Is this how our country will be built? The Jews will provide the work and
the work itself will be done for them by Arabs, and I dreamed of a different Land of
Israel, a land in which Jews work the land and enjoy the fruits of their labors. I won’t
allow foreigners to build my land”. In other words, the Arabs are a foreign element
that should be removed from the labor market.
Physical image – Children are often greatly influenced by the physical image of the
person in question, and their imagination fills in the small and unclear details.
Regarding the Palestinians, some descriptions (isolated ones it should be mentioned),
describe the large physical dimensions of the Arab-Palestinian stevedore (Journey to
the kibbutz). Page 18: “An Arab is selling ‘dates of India’, I was scared they were
poisonous, but the Jew who helped us before said that it was alright – it’s date juice.”
The Palestinian’s appearance is unfamiliar to the Jewish immigrants and he seems
frightening, threatening. Thus the stevedore who lifts the child up and puts him down
on the beach leaves us feeling unsure of his intentions.
The Palestinian stevedores are called “pirates”, which is clearly an expression of fear.
The vociferousness of the Arab stevedores creates apprehension among the Jews.
Some of the textbooks relate positively to the Arabs who lived in the country prior to
the Zionist settlement and in its early years, and these Arabs are described as wearing
tailored clothes and as being upright citizens. Their pleasant and respectable
appearance leaves the reader with a positive impression.
We thus see that the different textbooks do not present a uniform image of the Arab-
Palestinian.
The cultural image of the Palestinian is that of a person and of a group that is
connected to Arab-Muslim Eastern culture and not to Western culture.
The culture of the Palestinians is not described as urban but rather as a culture of
fellachim, pp. 204-205; pastoral scene with photographs of making coffee and playing
traditional musical instruments. There is also the story of Arabs who trespassed on the
lands which Petach Tikva residents used for grazing and for growing corn. It should
be mentioned that most of the country’s Arab residents were rural and not urban
residents.
The Palestinian is considered as not technologically advanced and not interested in
learning the new methods or keeping abreast with modern industrial culture. On the
contrary, the general aspiration is to preserve tradition.
In the books we examined, the Muslim orientation of most of the Palestinian
population is emphasized. Mention is made, however, of the Christian orientation of
part of the population.
Political image. In all the textbooks we examined, no mention is made of the
Palestinians’ political organization. No mention is made of cultural, economic or
political institutions that operate in the Arab-Palestinian public environment.
This is different from what is described in the Jewish sector, although here too the
political aspect is not emphasized in the elementary school textbooks.
E. The Israeli narrative
Countries use curriculums in all areas in order to shape the national super-narrative, in
addition to their primary pedagogical role of promoting education as well as social
and cultural development. The curriculum is a tool for shaping and educating the
coming generations. Some countries have a core program that determines the basic
contents for students throughout the country as an underlying condition for the
existence of a state-run system, while other countries determine guidelines and are not
involved in all the details of the curriculum.
In recent years the national narrative has entered the public discourse in various
countries, especially countries or national groups involved in the process of shaping
and consolidating themselves, or young countries in the process of determining their
borders or which lack existential security. This public discourse brings about, among
others, deep internal dissention concerning the collective identity, and existence of
partial identities such as that of minorities within the country, as well as cultural and
content changes in light of the different public streams.
The Israeli-Palestinian case, in which two nations are simultaneously involved in
formulating their national identity, and are involved in a public discussion about the
conflictual existential situation between them, is a special case which emphasizes the
importance of dealing with the national narrative as part of the elementary school
curriculum where the child’s collective identity is initially shaped.
In the textbooks we examined we found that the Bible textbooks relate in depth to the
religious development and consolidation of the Jewish People as a nation, and to the
its connection with the Land of Israel as a homeland. The relevant period dealt with
thus precedes the Christian era, the consequence being that there is no consideration
of the Palestinian narrative.
Page 10 – A girl and her family are fearful of immigrating to the Land of Israel
because there are very few Jews in the country, and most of the inhabitants are Arabs,
Bedouin and nomads. (It should be pointed out that this is an innovation in the Zionist
discourse, for it is not stated that the Arabs are aggressive and violent. Is this also
evidence of a lack of settlement continuity in the Land of Israel?) It is not pleasant to
live next to strangers.
An example from the table on page 15.
The written expression textbooks consider the Israeli and the Palestinian narrative in a
few places.
The Proclamation of Independence contains a key sentence regarding the Arabs in
Israel: “We appeal to the Arab inhabitants of the State of Israel”. Here the Arab
people are not called “Palestinians”, nor are they spoken of as citizens of the country
but only as inhabitants.
The story of the war of 1948, and its effect on both the Arab population in the Land of
Israel and on the Israeli-Jewish population, tells about wealthy Arabs who sold their
lands to the Zionists before 1948, on which a city was built in which mainly Jews
settled. Another story describes how Arabs left their villages because of armed gangs
who forced them out against their will. From the two stories we understand that the
narrative taught in the Israeli textbooks does not speak about the expulsion of Arabs
by Israeli soldiers, but rather that they left their villages because of dominant and
powerful members of their own people who suggested or urged them with promises to
leave their homes.
Concerning the reasons for the outbreak of the 1948 war, it is explained to the
students that the Arabs who left Beit She’an fled, and according to the Jewish
inhabitants, “we didn’t want this war”. “They started it”, a Jewish child says, and the
narrator, an adult, remains silent and does not react. Silence as admission. “A stone
tells.”
Other verbal expression textbooks teach that the Jews who lived alongside Arabs in
Beit She’an or in Jerusalem maintained good neighborly relations, and the Jews
promised the Arabs that they would look after their property after they fled, and
“when quiet returns to the country, you can return”, and a Jew promises an Arab “I
will take care of the apartment”.
Page 15 – Shaul Tchernichovsky’s poem “I believe”. This poem conveys a lack of
consideration for and a disregard of the other side, especially as the poet’s wish is
“then my people as well will return and flourish, and a generation will arise in the
land, the iron chains will be removed, the light will be seen clearly”. In other words,
the wish is for a lively and fruitful future, without relating to the “other” living in the
country.
The fear is expressed that the Jews will leave the country, while at the same time the
presence of others who live in this country is negated: “The emissary told us that the
situation in the Jewish villages is precarious. Arab workers are working in them and if
we don’t go and work in them, the Jews will leave the villages and we will lose the
land.
The attitude in the book toward the Arabs is ethnocentric and patronizing. The
demand is made to only employ Jews. That is to say, in this case there is also
delegitimization and negation of the Arabs, especially in the area of work, and an
attempt to evict them from the labor market. When the work supervisor in the story
fires the Arab workers, this is perceived as an achievement (pp. 100-101).
This trend continues on page 144: “You recall that my friends from Ben Shemen, who
came with me to the Galilee, moved to the Kinneret farm. They continued to live
cooperatively, worked the land, and enjoyed the good life the Galilee provided them.
Everything went well until one day the work supervisor hired Arabs to work on the
farm. My friends objected and spoke to the manager of the farm, but when this didn’t
help they declared a strike and left the farm in protest…”.
On page 261, the book gives a good example of the methods of “redeeming the land”:
“They even bought their working tools with their own money and didn’t wait for the
institutions to give them money. They knew that if they didn’t hurry to settle the
place, the Arabs living in the vicinity were liable to start cultivating the land, which
would make it very difficult to remove them.
The Jewish National Fund also bought land which then belonged to it in most legal
way possible. Does this sound strange? It was the law in those days and that is how
one had to behave.”
2. The Question of National Identity
The books we examined, designed in the main for elementary and junior high school
students, do not deal specifically with Palestinian national identity, that is to say, an
identity having the status of a recognized nation, with territorial ownership, and the
wish for an independent country.
Clearly, these conflictual issues will arise later in the upper high school classes when
the curriculum deals in depth with the twentieth century, and especially the history of
the Land of Israel and the relationship between the two nations.
One issue that is inextricably linked to the question of national identity in the Israeli-
Palestinian conflict is the question of the borders. Our findings show that despite its
importance, the question is not presented directly as a subject of study, but is rather
dealt with indirectly.
The question of the borders of the Land of Israel arises directly, or in the main
indirectly, in a number of subjects, among other reasons because students only start
studying the geography of the Land of Israel in junior high school. However, in the
Israel Studies textbooks in elementary school there are maps and texts that describe
various places in the Land of Israel. In the main, the maps do not relate to the political
borders, but are presented mainly in the context of the new Zionist settlement in the
Land of Israel.
Against this background, we need to examine the attitude to the Palestinian
settlements that existed prior to the definition of Israel’s political borders after the war
of 1948. The appearance of these settlements by name or not by name could attest to a
positive approach to the Palestinian people; on the other hand, not mentioning the
Arab settlements would attest to the negation and the conscious disregard of their
existence.
It should be mentioned that in the past the definition of the borders of the Land of
Israel was always a geographical and not a political issue. Only after the publication
of the First White Paper in 1922 and the Mandate document of 1922 did the question
of the political borders arise, borders that were defined in relation to the French
Mandate in Lebanon and Syria, and the British Mandate in Jordan.
The maps that appear in the history textbooks that we examined do not indicate Arab
settlements that existed in the Land of Israel prior to 1881 – the beginning of Zionist
settlement. (The beginnings of Zionism, Published by T.L., pp. 87, 108, 121.)
The conclusion that emerges from these textbooks is that the borders of “Arab
Palestine” are not dealt with in the historical maps.
The geographical textbooks dealing with the characteristics of the coastal plain do not
mention any Arab settlements in the region, except for Jaffa – the Arab city that was
the main port for the Land of Israel, and Acre.
On the other hand, in the maps of the Land of Israel in the written expression
textbooks that were examined, there is no demarcation of political borders, including
a lack of demarcation of the borders of the State of Israel before 1967. That is to say,
the Land of Israel implies the State of Israel, and there is no reference to Arab
settlements or political borders between the Jordan River and the sea.
The textbooks we examined do not deal with the issue of Palestinian national identity,
the reason being that they do not cover the relevant period.
There is no reference to Palestinian political organization in the history textbooks.
F. Themes and areas in which examples could be added to express a positive
attitude toward pluralism, tolerance, and peace, and suggestions for
improvement or change
Bible
Despite the fact that we found many cases in which value and moral issues arising
from the Biblical text are dealt with, there are places where this is lacking. For
example:
1. In the workbook on the Book of Genesis, in the context of God’s words to
Abraham in the Covenant between the Parts (Genesis, 15) – the main ideas are
presented: “God made a covenant with Abram. According to the covenant, Abram’s
people would believe in God and listen to him, and God would help his people. God
told Abram that his people would be slaves in Egypt. God promised that after four
hundred years he would take them out of Egypt and return them to Canaan” (p. 68).
The workbook does not relate to the reasoning why they would only return to Canaan
after four hundred years – “for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete” (that
the sins of the people of Canaan have not yet reached the level that would justify their
expulsion from the land). This reasoning could provide an opportunity for a critical
discussion on taking the land from the people living on it, as well as the possibility
that a corrupt society will ultimately destroy itself.
However, these issues are sometimes even difficult for high school students in the
upper grades to grasp, especially because we are dealing with “God’s promise”. Thus,
taking into account the young age of the students in this case (2nd grade), the writers
are probably correct in their assessment.
2. In the booklet “Exodus and Leviticus – Activity booklet for young learners”, by
Bina Geller Talitman and Chana Shalita:
a. In Exodus, Chapter1, the women are the heroes. Yocheved, Miriam
and Pharaoh’s daughter are the ones who reveal compassion and
courage in dealing with the order to kill the babies. In our view the
possibility is not sufficiently stressed that the midwives who saved the
Israelite children were Egyptians (besides Pharaoh’s daughter, of
course). The story stresses that there were also good people among the
Egyptians, and that feelings of compassion and courage do not reside
in any particular people. Examples and stories could have been
brought from other periods and from the “here and now”.
b. There is room to expand the discussion on the subject of slavery and
of taking away a person’s freedom.
3. In the workbook “With King David – student workbook for the Second Book of
Samuel”, by Aviva Tirosh and Bina Geller Talitman:
a. In the context of the sin of David and Bathsheba, while the writers do
relate to the subject of “illegal orders”, there is room to emphasize that
these orders are also relevant with regard to an enemy, and examples
could and should be brought from our reality, including the story of
Kfar Kassem which led to the coining of the term “a manifestly illegal
order”.
4. In the workbook “With Samuel and his generation – student workbook for the
First Book of Samuel”, by Bina Geller Talitman and Aviva Tirosh:
In the context of Chapter 13, the background to Saul’s war against the Philistines, it is
stated in the workbook: “The Philistines ruled Israel. This affected the daily life of the
people and its military strength. Jonathan attacked the Philistine garrison and by so
doing declared a revolt against the Philistines. Was it important and justified to revolt
against the Philistines?” (pp. 85-89). These statements constitute an attempt to
understand the people’s distress at being ruled by the Philistines and their motivation
to revolt. The discussion could be expanded to include the distress of any people ruled
by another, at any place and at any time, including the present.
(Possibly there is an expectation that the teacher will do this, for this is a student
workbook designed to be used as a basis for a guided discussion by the teacher in the
classroom).
History
In our opinion, the textbooks published before the 1990s should be examined and
updated with regard to the Israeli narrative and the attitude to the Palestinians.
The approach to Palestinian activities and organizational methods in the Land of
Israel in the 1920s and 1930s following the British conquest of 1917, should be
updated. The British conquest profoundly affected the two peoples, economically,
politically, and socially. Ignoring these developments makes it impossible to adopt a
balanced approach to the Arab minority in the State of Israel.
Summary
An examination of the elementary school textbooks in various subjects in the State
educational system leads to the following conclusions:
• The trend in most school subjects is to maintain a balanced and positive attitude
toward tolerance, peace and pluralism. In literature, written expression, and even
Bible studies, a positive and accepting attitude to the “other” is emphasized.
• In a subject such as history which is concerned with the modern collective
narrative, as opposed to Bible studies in which the ancient narrative is less
binding and controversial, there is a clear emphasis on the Israeli-Zionist story.
This narrative emphasizes the role played by the Jews in building the country up
to the establishment of the state, and their close attachment to and love of the
land as agricultural workers, no less than its Arab inhabitants. On the other hand,
a clear attempt is made to preserve a balance and not to ignore the presence of
the non-Jewish inhabitants of the Land of Israel prior to Zionism, and during the
period of settling the national home, and setting up the state.
• Most of the textbooks do not deal directly with the political aspects of the
country, but rather with its social, ethnic, cultural and religious aspects. This
might be due to the wish to avoid a political discussion which the younger
children would find intolerable.
• We feel that it is appropriate to draw attention to the fact that most of the
textbooks and the workbooks have been adapted to children of elementary
school age. For this reason, the political aspects, including the national narrative,
are not emphasized, even though they are referred to in the story of the history of
Zionist settlement in the Land of Israel.
Our hope is that the balance will continue, that the injustices requiring correction will
be corrected as well as the contents of the books, and that the factual aspects will be
more emphasized than the mythological aspects.
APPENDICES
Textbooks examined in this survey.
Name of Book: Literature Selections – Rina Tzedakah
Examples of an ambiguous or
negative approach toward
pluralism / tolerance / peace
pp. 10-11: Problematic attitude toward gender –
Women are presented as if their major occupation is
hobbies (piano, guitar) or other pastimes such as
preparing salads. Men and women are
disproportionately represented, and even though one
of the exercises has a female manager, this is the
only serious occupation.
pp. 33-35: In the story “Mahmoud Abu Gandil’s
donkey”, Mahmoud the Arab is portrayed as a sly
merchant who cheats the Jewish boy who brings him
ten pairs of shoes and expects to obtain a donkey in
return, but the merchant disappears.
p. 59: In the story with the Persian, there is a
sentence “until the clever Jewish doctor arrives” – a
sentence that displays a jarring superiority when told
by a Jew.
Examples of a positive
approach toward pluralism /
tolerance / peace
The book is pluralistic in that its sources include
many places: China, Greece, and Japan, as well as
stories of different communities. On the one hand a
story deals with a Pole who is involved with a
woman who is worse than the Angel of Death, but
there is also a story of a woman who prays quickly
and who displays positive assertive characteristics.
Themes / areas in which
examples could be added to
express a positive attitude
toward pluralism / tolerance /
and peace.
Suggestions for improvement
/ change
The book is very diverse in its allegorical content as
well as its use of stories from many places, such as
China, Greece, and Japan. Arab authors could of
course be added and/or Arab folk tales. The literature
is original and shouldn’t be changed, although it
could be diversified.
Name of Book: People in different places – The geography of the world’s
population
Examples of an ambiguous or
negative approach toward
pluralism / tolerance / peace
p. 107: The Proclamation of Independence is
mentioned with particular emphasis on the aspect of
the Jewish national home. While this chapter is
concerned with immigration, it does not deal with
the problematic aspect of a “national home” for the
non-Jewish population. Even when the non-Jewish
population is mentioned, no attention is given to the
problematic nature of its national identity. For
example, on p. 109 it is stated that “the only source
of growth of the non-Jewish population in Israel in
natural growth, while immigration plays no part in
its growth” – without explaining the reason for this.
Examples of a positive
approach toward pluralism /
tolerance / peace
The conception is pluralistic. Examples are drawn
from all over the world, and attention is devoted to a
range of worldwide problems – family size,
increasing birthrate, divorce, social welfare,
education, housing, and development. The book
includes in-depth case studies of three places:
Nigeria, Sweden, and Israel. With regard to the non-
Jewish population in the Israeli case study, the book
describes in text and in pictures the transition from a
traditional lifestyle to modernity (p. 110). The
concept of the village would, in the past, be
attributed to an Arab village, while here it refers to a
Jewish village. (p. 160)
Themes / areas in which
examples could be added to
express a positive attitude
toward pluralism / tolerance /
and peace.
The Israeli example describes the Russian
immigration. The Ethiopian immigration is neither
mentioned in the text nor in the pictures.
Suggestions for improvement
/ change
Name of Book: People in different places – An activity booklet
Examples of an ambiguous or
negative approach toward
pluralism / tolerance / peace
p. 43: The settlement of the coastal plain. Very little
attention is given to the Arab population who lived
in the area, and the book only deals with the
purchase of land from people who agreed to sell. No
mention is made of removal of the Arabs. With
regard to the impact of immigration on the state of
Israel, on page 112 the students are asked to find
common elements that have been created in the
country. An example is given of the Day of
Remembrance for the fallen in Israel’s wars and
Holocaust day, examples that are so problematic for
Arab citizens, but whose implications are not
considered.
Examples of a positive
approach toward pluralism /
tolerance / peace
Assignments for expanding knowledge – p. 94:
“Interview an Israeli citizen who does not belong to
the group to which you belong…” This is an
admirable assignment; the question is whether it is
implemented.
The book is empathic to the problems faced by
immigrants, including people moving within the
country. A section on pages 115 and 116 considers
the pros and cons of unrestricted immigration, and
considers the moral aspects of tolerance toward
strangers.
Themes / areas in which
examples could be added to
express a positive attitude
toward pluralism / tolerance /
and peace.
Suggestions for improvement
/ change
Activities should be added that stress the complexity
and the difficulty of living in a country with a
population of different nationalities, emphasizing the
difficulties experienced by minorities. Ways should
be found to foster tolerance. This book invites
students to deal with these issues in depth, and this
should be exploited.
Name of Book: On the tip of my tongue, Vol. 2
Examples of an ambiguous or
negative approach toward
pluralism / tolerance / peace
p. 21: A map without the borders of the West Bank
and the Gaza Strip. Also, only the cities of Haifa, Tel
Aviv, Jerusalem, Be’er Sheva and Eilat are included.
Shfrar’am, Gaza, etc. are not indicated.
pp. 22-23: Mention is only made of male
professionals.
Examples of a positive
approach toward pluralism /
tolerance / peace
p. 40: Both sexes are dealt with equally, and there is
even a picture of both a man and a woman wearing
aprons.
Themes / areas in which
examples could be added to
express a positive attitude
In general, universal human actions are considered,
including delinquent behavior – stealing (p. 100).
Lacking on page 40 is any consideration of others
toward pluralism / tolerance /
and peace.
who are different, e.g. religious people, Arabs, and
Ethiopians.
Suggestions for improvement
/ change
Name of Book: Reading isn’t everything – A booklet of comprehension exercises
– Part A
Examples of an ambiguous or
negative approach toward
pluralism / tolerance / peace
p. 65: The map of Israel does not show the borders of
the West Bank and the Gaza Strip – annexation.
Examples of a positive
approach toward pluralism /
tolerance / peace
pp. 76-77: People from different cultures are
mentioned – the Bedouin. The approach is mainly
descriptive and traditional.
Themes / areas in which
examples could be added to
express a positive attitude
toward pluralism / tolerance /
and peace.
p. 76: The Bedouin are dealt with in terms of
traditional characteristics. Some modern aspects
should be added, e.g. children going to school
dressed in jeans and playing computer games, in
order to show a more complex picture.
Suggestions for improvement
/ change
Name of Book: New Israeli readings – Vol. F
Examples of an ambiguous or
negative approach toward
pluralism / tolerance / peace
Examples of a positive
approach toward pluralism /
tolerance / peace
p. 153: Martians – people from different places in the
world are actually the same, including Martians.
p. 38: I believe – “I also believe in people and that
the time will come when there is peace between
nations”.
p. 47: Shofman – The Two. Relates to the herd
instinct in people. People don’t tend to offer
assistance, but there will always be two who are
different and who will provide help to others.
p. 67: The inner boundaries – on the war and the
convoy of Arab refugees leaving Beit She’an for
Jordan. Initially there was a border of foreignness,
and now an actual border. On p. 67 Gad says: “We
didn’t want this war – they started it and I kept
quiet.” This silence raises doubts about the
statement. Is it as simple as saying that they started it
and that they thus deserve the consequences?
p. 71: Uri and Sami – an encounter between a Jewish
and an Arab child that begins in fear and ends with
the Jewish child telling the Arab child that his father
was killed in the war, and Sami, who was expelled
from his village, covering Uri so that he won’t be
cold when he goes to sleep.
Themes / areas in which
examples could be added to
express a positive attitude
toward pluralism / tolerance /
and peace.
Suggestions for improvement
/ change
p. 78: Brotherhood in Ramle – only one Jew at that
time [who did not have a good relationship with the
Arab population] and he “was an Ashkenazi who
didn’t understand the Arab concept of hospitality”.
(In the end he too was hospitable.)
What is lacking is any consideration of the presence
of the pre-state Arab population that was removed.
The description of the refugees who left is too brief.
By 6th grade the children should be capable of
understanding the complexity of coexistence
between the two nationalities in Israel.
Name of Book: Through words – Vol. E
Examples of an ambiguous or
negative approach toward
pluralism / tolerance / peace
Examples of a positive
approach toward pluralism /
tolerance / peace
pp. 25-27: A situation of the strong versus the weak
in which both have a place.
On family togetherness – tolerance toward families
that are different: a child who is embarrassed by his
wagoner father, a child growing up in a foster
family, girls living in poverty. On the issue of
participating in society – stories about attempts to
join in with others that arouse empathy toward
people who are different – from different countries,
exceptional or disabled children.
p. 108: Children’s rights – emphasizing that all
children have rights, irrespective of religion, race,
sex, or national origin.
p. 109: A joke about the difference between a battle
and a massacre that raises many important questions.
p. 115: Story about a wonderful Arab Bedouin
hunter.
p. 128: Story about an Arab landlord, Muhammad,
and his Jewish tenant in Jerusalem. The Partition
Resolution and the riots created fear which led
Muhammad to leave to Jordan. The end is optimistic:
“I’ll look after the apartment” the Jew tells the Arab,
“and when the country is quiet, you can return”.
p. 150: The story told by the Galilee Arabs about the
creation of the Jordan river. How the kadi judged
between the warring factions, the Dan, Hatzbani, and
Banias rivers, and made them one – that is to say,
unification solves quarrels. This book refers to the
message of the Days of Awe as being that of
forgiveness.
p. 220: The choice offered in the Proclamation of
Independence, “Call on the Arab nation…”
p. 226: New immigrants talk – stories of strangers
from many countries.
p. 232: Anti-militaristic message – war is bad.
p. 234: There are victories and there are defeats, but
peace depends on you.
p. 236: On peace in the United Nations Charter.
p. 294: A story about the wisdom of a Bedouin sheik.
Themes / areas in which
examples could be added to
express a positive attitude
toward pluralism / tolerance /
and peace.
Suggestions for improvement
/ change
Name of Book: Diversity – For 7th Grade
Examples of an ambiguous or
negative approach toward
pluralism / tolerance / peace
Examples of a positive
approach toward pluralism /
tolerance / peace
p. 52: Photographs from an elementary school –
tolerance toward people of different nationalities.
p. 124: The story of Little Red Riding Hood and the
Three Pigs from the viewpoint of the wolf – raises
the possibility of different narratives around a single
event.
p. 155: Wisdom actually resides in the children. This
encourages the students to listen to everyone.
p. 287: It comes back to me – A shocking story about
attempts to survive in the Holocaust in which there is
no hatred toward the Germans or even toward the
Nazis. Also the stories dealing with struggles and
with memory that are replete with pain, sadness, and
comradeship, yet no hate. The stories attest to the
fact that even though my adversary is considered as
the enemy, he or she is still a person like me.
Themes / areas in which
examples could be added to
express a positive attitude
toward pluralism / tolerance /
and peace.
The book is filled with drawings that add layers of
interpretation to the stories and provide another view
of the same idea. This strengthens the idea of
different narratives of the same event.
Suggestions for improvement
/ change
What is lacking is a view of the “enemy” as a person,
and a tendency to ignore his existence.
Name of Book: Friends: Part A and B – Activity workbook
Examples of an ambiguous or
negative approach toward
pluralism / tolerance / peace
Examples of a positive
approach toward pluralism /
tolerance / peace
Part A, p. 21: “My father is a soldier” – The
message: there is nothing particularly admirable in
the fact that the father is a soldier..
The workbook attempts to identify my feelings and
those of others, as well as a continuum of reactions
of what precedes what. These are important
assignments in creating empathy toward and
understanding of others’ feelings.
Themes / areas in which
examples could be added to
express a positive attitude
toward pluralism / tolerance /
and peace.
Feelings are identified in day-to-day events.
Suggestions for improvement
/ change
Name of Book: Through words – Vol. D
Examples of an ambiguous or
negative approach toward
pluralism / tolerance / peace
p. 258: A stone in the wall speaks about how the
homes were built on land purchased from the Arabs,
and how we gave baksheesh to the Turks to look the
other way.
p. 75: A complex story that includes tolerance and
love of humanity, but which also offers a single
explanation of why the Arabs left their villages,
namely, because Arab “gangs” called on them to do
so.
Examples of a positive
approach toward pluralism /
tolerance / peace
p. 15: A story about accepting strangers, the
difficulties involved in accepting strangers and the
guilt feelings aroused by not accepting strangers.
p. 75: The almond tree on the border – a sad story
about the border that runs between two good friends,
“Jews and Arabs” which turns them into enemies,
accompanied by the words of Abu Salach, “war is
not good”.
p. 107: Herzl’s exhortation: “Build your homes so
that foreigners will feel good in your midst”.
p. 143: From the Proclamation of Independence – the
call to the Arab inhabitants to participate in the
country on the basis of equal citizenship.
p. 146: Eulogy for Goni who fell in war: “He wasn’t
killed because we hate Arabs”.
The whole chapter on the Day of Remembrance and
the Day of Independence emphasizes peace,
including a Chinese story whose message is peace.
p. 150: A free nation – trusts its borders and trusts its
neighbors.
p. 162: A song of peace.
p. 166-7: Good neighborly relations between a
Jewish girl and an Arab boy whose wish to do good
for each other is ended sadly by the war.
In the chapter of stories about different places, there
is a story on p. 236 of a meeting between a Jew and
an Arab and the sadness of separation.
p. 252: The wisdom of a sheik who ensures that
justice is done between Bedouin.
Stories of tolerance toward strangers, the poor, and
the elderly. pp. 96, 111-115, 282, 284-288. Also, the
stories about war are not militaristic.
Themes / areas in which
examples could be added to
express a positive attitude
toward pluralism / tolerance /
and peace.
Suggestions for improvement
/ change
Name of Book: Through words – Vol. B
Examples of an ambiguous or
negative approach toward
pluralism / tolerance / peace
p. 97: A strange choice from the Proclamation of
Independence – “We call upon the Arab inhabitants
of the State of Israel to preserve peace”. No
clarification is provided that they are citizens like
any others.
p. 98: Justifying the establishment of the State of
Israel on the basis of hatred for the Jews.
p. 103: All Israel’s citizens remember the fallen and
talk about their bravery. No mention is made of Arab
citizens.
pp. 110-111: Jerusalem – Mosques and churches are
conspicuous in the photograph, yet the text only
relates to the Jewish Quarter and the Western Wall.
At no point is it mentioned that Jerusalem is holy to
other religions.
Regarding festivals – only Jewish festivals are
mentioned.
Examples of a positive
approach toward pluralism /
tolerance / peace
p. 8: Tolerance toward the unfamiliar stranger, the
difficult process of absorption, and finally the person
becomes like everyone else “quarrels and makes up,
loves and hates”.
p. 15: A respectful attitude to the poor.
p. 28: Joseph’s brothers – An insightful distinction
between permitted feelings of hate and envy and
forbidden violent behavior, the solution being
dialogue.
p. 89: Elijah the Prophet has a white beard like
grandfather Abraham, and wears a large Arab
traditional garment. This creates closeness between
the characters.
p. 142-143: Jews host Bedouin and the Bedouin ask
a woman to greet their hosts.
Themes / areas in which
examples could be added to
express a positive attitude
toward pluralism / tolerance /
Festivals of other nationalities and religions should
be included.
Mention should be made of the Muslim and
Christian holy places in Jerusalem.
and peace.
Suggestions for improvement
/ change
Name of Book: Workshop in Bible studies for elementary school students in the
State educational system, by Bina Geller Talitman and Chana Shalita.
The approach – As described in the body of the report, “this activity booklet uses an
interdisciplinary approach to facilitate the understanding of young learners, in
addition to a rich variety of activities connected to the Book of Genesis. The booklet
contains Mishnaic and Talmudic legends, literature, songs, and sources of
information. The activities include language development, discussion of moral values,
multi-directional cognitive development, and creativity”.
General assessment – In the discussion of moral values as well as the homiletic
interpretations, the legends and the literary extracts that are chosen to enrich the
Biblical text, the emphasis is on moral values and universal human feelings. The
proposed activities encourage the children to ask questions, to criticize the behavior of
the heroes on moral grounds, to express feelings, and to hypothesize what the
characters thought and felt.
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
The subject: The promise of the land to Abraham’s
descendents –
1. In the Torah portion Lech Lecha, no reference is made to
the fact that the Bible notes the presence of other people in
the land (“and the Canaanite was already in the land”), p. 54.
2. The main ideas of the Covenant between the Parts are
presented in the booklet: “God made a covenant with
Abram. According to the covenant, Abram’s people would
believe in God and listen to him, and God would help his
people. God told Avram that his people would be slaves in
Egypt. God promised that after four hundred years he would
take them out of Egypt and return them to Canaan” (p. 68).
The workbook does not relate to the reasoning why they
would only return to Canaan after four hundred years – “for
the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete” (that the
sins of the people of Canaan have not yet reached the level
that would justify their expulsion from the land). This
reasoning could provide an opportunity for a critical
discussion on taking the land from the people living on it, as
well as the possibility that a corrupt society will ultimately
destroy itself.
However, these issues are even sometimes difficult for high
school students in the upper grades to grasp, especially
because we are dealing with “God’s promise”. Thus, taking
into account the young age of the students in this case (2nd
grade), the writers are probably correct in their assessment.
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1. In the introduction to the students: “The Book of Genesis
is …the book concerns people in general …and Jews in
particular for every generation and at any time. The
characters and the stories…serve as examples of human
behavior to this day.”
2. On the commandment to Adam after the Creation – the
interpretation emphasizes the positive and constructive
meaning (and not the belligerent meaning that could be
implied by the text). “Fill the earth and subdue it; have
dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air,
and over every living thing…” The accompanying pictures
are of working the land, building a home, and milking a cow
(p. 6).
3. Emphasizing equality between the sexes. The context –
the creation of man. “When we say ‘man’ we mean
something different each time: Sometimes we mean the first
man, sometimes it is someone’s name, sometimes we mean
both man and woman. For example, when we say ‘man can
think’, we mean both men and women” (p. 8).
4. The context – The seventh day of Creation – the Sabbath.
The question put to the students: “To whom was the day of
rest given? Answer with the help of the clues.” The clues are
presented in a drawing with images of people working in
different occupations – a Chinese, an Indian, a dark-skinned
person, women, etc. (p. 13).
5. The context – The Flood – The dove with an olive branch
as a symbol of peace. Pictures of Israeli stamps from the
series “My Peace” consisting of children’s drawings in
which the dove appears, as well as Arab and Jewish figures
holding hands (p. 38).
6. The context – The Tower of Babel – A homiletic
interpretation demonstrating the idea of the building of the
Tower of Babel as the worship of materialism and power, at
the expense of human behavior and social sensitivity (p. 47).
7. The context – The quarrel between Abram’s shepherds
and Lot’s shepherds. Abram solved the quarrel peacefully.
He suggested that they separate and allowed Lot first choice
of where to settle. The children are told that in one of the
stories of the sages there is a further hypothesis of why the
shepherds quarreled. The hypothesis is presented to the
children by means of a drawing:
Drawing 1: Abram says: “Why are you leading Lot’s flocks
into fields that do not belong to you?”
Drawing 2: Abram says: “You are entering other people’s
fields and you shouldn’t be doing it” (pp. 59-61).
8. The context – Sodom and Gomorrah – “It was important
to Abraham that God would punish justly and that not all the
people in Sodom would be punished…” Activity: “You are
invited to write a letter to God with thoughts you have about
all kinds of unfair things that are happening in the world”
(pp. 75-77).
9. The context – The banishment of Hagar and Ishmael and
the covenant.
- The children are invited to ask a question about the story or
to express their opinion about one of the characters (Sarah,
Abraham, God).
- A contemporary story is presented, called “My heart is
with Ishmael (by Yael Medini). Na’ama talks about the
friendship and love that existed between her and Ishmael
(and other children), and about the heartbreak, the tears and
the pain when he left. The writer causes the children to be
very critical of Abraham and Sarah (pp. 85-88).
“The angel said that Ishmael would create a great people,
and Abraham arranged for Ishmael to be circumcised when
he was thirteen years old. The Muslims, who see themselves
as descendents of Ishmael, conduct a circumcision ceremony
for boys turning thirteen.”
The children are also encouraged to feel empathic toward
Ishmael in the context of Abraham’s death. The suggested
activity: “After the funeral, Isaac and Ishmael sat down to
talk. What did they talk about? Perhaps they remembered
incidents from their childhood? Perhaps Ishmael spoke
about how he felt when he and his mother were banished?”
(p. 104)
10. The context – Sarah’s death in the Cave of Machpela.
“The Cave of Machpela is a holy place for both Jews and
Muslims…Both groups pray there today (p. 95).
11. The context – The feud between Isaac’s shepherds and
those of Abimelech over the wells. “You are invited to draw
up the peace treaty between Isaac and the King of Gerer”
(p. 111). “These days as well there are treaties between
people and between countries. You can see a picture of the
signing of a peace treaty”. The picture that appears is that of
Rabin and Hussein at the peace-signing ceremony between
Israel and Jordan.
12. The context – The meeting of Esau and Jacob. From the
stories of our sages: “Why was Jacob afraid? Jacob said…I
neither want to kill nor to be killed. Jacob’s fear is that
might kill Esau.” (p. 136)
13. The context – The selling of Joseph. “If I were Joseph’s
brother” – “It’s a pity that this family…didn’t talk about the
situation…Perhaps, had they spoken, things would not have
deteriorated so much…” (p. 144)
Name of Book: Exodus and Leviticus – Activity booklet for young readers, by
Bina Geller Talitman and Chana Shalita.
As stated on the cover, the booklet offers activities dealing with language
development, values, multi-dimensional cognitive development, and creativity.
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1. On Exodus, 2 – “Gilad says: ‘In my opinion, Moses was
rash, he was too quick to kill the Egyptian’. How would you
answer Gilad? Moses intervened on behalf of the weak (It
would be beneficial to emphasize that his intervention on
behalf of the weak included the assistance he gave to the
daughters of Jethro, who were not of his people). If you are
familiar with stories of people who intervened for the
benefit of weaker people, bring these stories to the class.”
(p. 19).
2. On Exodus, 14 – “The Egyptians drown in the sea. From
the stories of our sages: ‘One of the sages asks himself: The
Egyptians have already been severely punished. Why did
God not find a way to save the Children of Israel without
drowning the Egyptians?’ The legend says that God
consulted with the angels and some were opposed to
drowning the Egyptians. The angel Gabriel tipped the scales
by bringing a brick with an Israelite child’s bones sunk into
it, a child who the Egyptians had buried. The end of the
story: ‘The angels were pleased and sang when the
Egyptians drowned, while God in his sadness said: The
work of my hands is drowning and you are singing before
me?’” (p. 82)
3. On Leviticus, 15. The context – Laws intended to serve
the poor and the stranger. “Gilad asks: I don’t understand
why the Torah commands us to treat the stranger well. Sari
answers: I think that it’s hard for people to treat strangers
well. Why don’t you join the discussion?” (p. 159)
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
1. In Exodus, 1, the women are the heroes. Yocheved,
Miriam, and Pharaoh’s daughter are the ones who reveal
compassion and courage in dealing with the order to kill the
babies. In our view the possibility is not sufficiently stressed
that the midwives who saved the Israelite babies were
(apparently) Egyptians. The story stresses that there were
good people among the Egyptians, and that feelings of
compassion and courage do not reside in any particular
people. Examples and stories could have been brought from
other periods and from the present time.
2. There is room to expand the discussion on the subject of
slavery and of taking away a person’s freedom.
3. There is also room to raise the dilemma of the ten plagues
in general, and the killing of the firstborn in particular.
Name of Book: Series with the Bible – With Joshua – Workbook for students by
Aviva Tirosh and Bina Geller Talitman
The teaching of the Book of Joshua, which deals almost entirely with the wars to
conquer the Land of Canaan, including the commandment to destroy the seven
Canaanite nations, is problematic from the start, especially for 4th grade students. It
would, however, be incorrect to ignore the book. The book cover states: “The method
of working assists the student to become familiar with the people of the world of that
time. The workbook contains assignments that develop comprehension of the Biblical
text, moral judgment, critical and creative thinking.” One of the ways in which the
writers attempt to deal with the moral problems that emerge from the Biblical text, is
by sharpening the distinction between what was acceptable in Biblical times and what
is acceptable today.
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1. Chapter 7, the Achan episode – “Why is the whole Jewish
people accused of sin? Is it right that the whole Jewish
people should suffer because one person sinned?”.
“In Biblical times it was acceptable to punish a whole family
when one of its members sinned. In light of what is currently
acceptable, is it justified that Achan’s family was punished.
What can this chapter teach us today?” (pp. 44-46). There is
room to ask whether in certain cases we, the state of Israel
for example, would behave in this way. Is it acceptable?
2. Chapter 8, the conquest of Ai – “What is your opinion, as
people living here today, of the killing of the inhabitants of
Ai by Joshua and his army?” “Joshua allowed the people of
Israel to take loot. On the other hand, the IDF strictly forbids
the taking of loot. Why do you think that Joshua permitted
the taking of loot? And why does the IDF prohibit it?” For
their creative assignments, the students are invited to put
themselves in another person’s shoes: “A refugee from Ai
flees to another city and writes a report for the local
newspaper there. Write or record”.
3. Chapter 14. “It is interesting that the Cave of Machpelah
is holy not only to Jews but also to Muslims and to
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Instances in which there is no attempt to deal with value
issues and moral problems arising from the Biblical text:
1. Chapter 3. Reference is made to the fact that Verse 10
mentions the different nations living in the land, and the
students are asked to name them, but no attempt is made to
deal with value issues around the fact that many nations
lived in this land.
2. The conquest of Jericho. There is no specific reference to
the destruction of the people of Jericho. Rather, the
workbook deals with the different meanings of the word
“cherem” [boycott, excommunicate]. However, the value
issue is dealt with in the context of the conquest of Ai.
The way the workbook relates to the connection between
the Bible and the national Israeli narrative:
pp. 68-69: “Some of the place names that we use today are
connected to the history of the people of Israel. They are
ancient-new names. Interestingly, Binyamin Ze’ev Herzl,
the visionary of the Jewish state, called one of his books
‘Altneuland’ which means ancient-new land. In the name he
chose he wished to express the idea that the Jews from the
Diaspora would return to an ancient land and build a new
state.” There is here an emphasis on the historical
connection to the country. The way the book is written does
not imply exclusivity, nor does it negate the contact that
others have to this land.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
Name of Book: Series with the Bible – With and without Judges – Workbook for
students on the Book of Judges and the Book of Ruth, by Aviva Tirosh and Bina
Geller Talitman
In the main, the Book of Judges deals with stories of war. In this case, the wars are
not those of conquest, but rather wars of liberation. Many activities in the booklet
encourage value judgments on the part of the students.
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1. Chapter 4: Yael and Sisera. “What is your opinion about
what Yael, wife of Heber the Kennite did? Bear in mind that
the concept of hospitality was important in the ancient
world”. (p. 30)
2. Chapter 8, Gideon: “Why in your opinion did the people
of Succoth and Penuel refuse Gideon? Bear in mind where
these cities are located”. (Is this an attempt to understand the
problems faced by the people of Succoth? And of Penuel?
(p. 58)
3. Chapter 10, Yiftach’s war against the people of Ammon.
“Yiftach did not immediately declare war but tried to
conduct negotiations with the king of the people of Ammon”
(p. 75). (A suggestion for elaboration: The students could
examine possible alternatives facing Yiftach after the failure
of the initial negotiations, and could suggest a way of
solving the conflict peacefully.)
4. Chapter 14, Samson. “Samson wished to take his revenge
on the Philistines who had insulted his wife and his family,
and he burned many of the Philistines’ fields. What do you
think about this?” (p. 103) On Samson’s exploitation of the
foxes: “If a newspaper had been published at the time with
an announcement from the SPCA, what would have been
written in the announcement?” “The tribe of Dan issued a
newspaper at the time expressing various opinions about
Samson. What do you think about the way Samson chose to
die?” (p. 105, 113)
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
The book contains pictures designed to demonstrate the
agricultural work (using old methods) mentioned in the
stories (plowing with oxen, threshing wheat, sheep shearing
etc.). These pictures are generally of Arab villages. On the
one hand, they reflect the inhabitants’ contact to the land,
which is a positive message. On the other hand, they could
strengthen the stereotype of the Arab as primitive. Pictures
could be included, for example, of an Arab plowing with a
tractor, or a Jew shearing sheep.
Name of Book: Series with the Bible – With Samuel and his generation –
Workbook for students on the First Book of Samuel, by Bina Geller Talitman
and Aviva Tirosh
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1. The Eli family punishment – “All of Eli’s family,
including those not yet born, were to be punished. How does
this seem to you today? (Remember that opinions change)”
(p. 25).
2. “Ilana asks: How can we condemn Eli’s family for not
obeying their father? After all, it is written ‘Because God
desired to kill them’ (Verse 25). That is to say, God did not
allow them to choose how to behave. Was he correct in
punishing them?”
3. Chapter 7, Samuel as a leader. “We have seen that Samuel
fulfilled many roles (spiritual leader, priest, and judge). Do
you think it is appropriate for a single leader to have so
many dut ies? Give your reasons. In a democratic system (in
which the people choose the leaders) it is not acceptable for
one person to hold so many positions. Can you think why?”
(pp. 49-50)
4. Chapter 9, Saul is chosen to be king. “It is said of Saul
that he was modest, and that he related to his slave in the
same way that he related to himself, ‘lest my father cease
caring about the donkeys and become worried about us’. Is
humility an important characteristic for a leader? Give your
reasons. How in modern times are the people involved in
choosing leaders in democratic society? Does the law
currently regard someone who is opposed to the regime as
corrupt?” (p. 68).
5. Chapter 15, Saul’s war against the Amalakites. “Think
about and discuss: Samuel demanded in God’s name to kill
the women and children of Israel’s historic enemy. What
would you think of an act like this if it were done in our
times? Samuel’s demand that all the Amalekites be killed,
including women and children, is interesting. Today, killing
on such a scale is known as ‘genocide’, which means
‘destroying a nation’. According to a treaty between member
states of the United Nations, genocide is completely
forbidden.” (p. 101)
6. Chapter 22, Saul kills the priests of Nob. “The major
question to be discussed in teaching the chapter is: What is
your opinion of Saul’s behavior toward the priests of Nob?”
(p. 123)
7. Chapter 31, the death of Saul and his sons and their
burial. “It is interesting that IDF soldiers are explicitly
instructed not to leave fallen soldiers on the battlefield…also
IDF soldiers are instructed to respectfully bury fallen enemy
soldiers.” (p. 144)
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
Chapter 13, the background to Saul’s war against the
Philistines. The workbook deals with this subject: “The
Philistines ruled Israel. This affected the daily life of the
people and its military strength. Jonathan attacked the
Philistine garrison and by so doing declared a revolt against
the Philistines. Was it important and justified to revolt
against the Philistines?” (pp. 85-89). These statements
constitute an attempt to understand the people’s distress at
being ruled by the Philistines and their motivation to revolt.
The discussion could be expanded to include the distress of
any people ruled by another, at any place and at any time,
including the present.
(Possibly there is an expectation that the teacher will do this,
for this is a student workbook designed to be used as a basis
for a guided discussion by the teacher in the classroom).
Name of Book: Series with the Bible – With King David – Workbook for students
on the Second Book of Samuel, by Aviva Tirosh and Bina Geller Talitman
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1. “A song of praise was composed to celebrate David’s
conquest of Jerusalem, written by one of the king’s writers.”
(p. 43)
2. Chapter 8, a summary of David’s wars. The workbook
contains a map showing the areas of the kingdom that were
conquered. David’s wars were not wars of liberation, but
rather wars of conquest to expand borders. This distinction
is lacking. Furthermore, the following sentence appears in
the summary: “David’s wars brought the nation peace and
security”. (pp. 51-52)
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1. Chapter 1, David mourns Saul’s death. “Was David
correct when he ordered the Amalakite boy to be killed?”. A
writing assignment: “One of David’s young followers spoke
to his family…he felt that the Amalakite boy should not
have been killed. What did he say? How did his family
respond?” (p. 8).
2. Chapter 2:26, Avner’s call to Joab: “Shall the sword
devour for ever?” “A language assignment: You have set up
an organization to prevent wars. What phrase in the chapter
would you choose as a slogan?” (p. 25)
3. In the context of the conquest of Jerusalem (Jebus) by
King David. An aerial photograph of “the south-eastern
corner of the Old City with the mosque of the Dome of the
Rock”. The photograph indicates the area of the City of
David as well as the names of other sites, including the
mosque (p. 37).
4. In the context of David’s sin with Bathsheba, “David is
guilty of Uria’s death. Joab is also guilty of Uria’s death,
because he carried out David’s orders. It is interesting that
according to the laws of the state of Israel, it is forbidden for
a soldier to carry out a clearly illegal order. Let us assume
that a soldier today receives an order like the one Joab
received. How should he react?” (pp. 54-58)
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
1. Chapter 2, “Sha ll the sword devour for ever”. There is
room to expand the discussion on the value of peace.
2. David’s conquest of Jerusalem. Under the heading “it is
interesting to know”, there is a review of the history of
Jerusalem from the Canaanite period and the period of
David. The review concludes: “When the State of Israel was
established, Jerusalem was declared as the country’s
capital”. There is room to relate here to the fact that
Jerusalem is also holy to Muslims and Christians (as was
stated with regard to the Cave of Machpelah in other
workbooks).
3. In the context of David’s sin with Bathsheba, when
dealing with illegal orders, there is room to emphasize that
these orders are also relevant to those you are fighting
against, and examples could and should be brought from our
reality, including the story of Kfar Kassem which led to the
coining of the term “a manifestly illegal order”. (It should,
however, be borne in mind that this is a student workbook
which serves as the basis for a class discussion. In any
event, it is the teacher’s task to expand the discussion. It is
preferable that an example such as Kfar Kassem be brought
by the teacher.
4. Chapter 12, the parable of the “poor man’s lamb”. On
page 66, it is stated: “The story of the poor man’s lamb has
become a symbol of a story with a moral”. Real life
examples can be presented.
Name of Book: Workbook on the prophets Jonah and Amos, by Bina Geller
Talitman and Rachel Nechemkin - for junior-high-school students
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
The Book of Jonah:
1. “God said to Jonah: ‘Arise, go to Nineveh’ (1:2). From
this we learn that God is responsible for all people and not
only for the Jewish people. Toward the end of the story we
come across the verse ‘and should not I pity Nineveh, that
great city’ (4:11). What does this teach us about how God
relates to human beings?”
2. In the context of comparing Jonah’s behavior to that of
the sailors (who were not Jews) during the storm at sea, the
workbook quotes the legend from Pirkei d’Rabbi Eliezer,
who elaborates and emphasizes the many attempts made by
the sailors to avoid throwing Jonah into the sea. In light of
the legend, the students are asked: “How does the legend
strengthen and emphasize the human and moral behavior of
the sailors?”
3. The context: The sins of the people of Nineveh and God’s
moral demands of all the nations.
“The following legends are found in the Talmud; read them.
Legend A – While the people of Israel were crossing the sea,
the ministering angels asked them to sing to the Almighty,
and the Almighty said to them: you are drowning because of
my actions and you sing to me? Legend B – The Almighty
rejects no one, he accepts everyone, the twenty (gates of
repentance) are always open, and anyone who wishes to
enter may do so. Legend C – Elijah said, ‘I am sure that the
spirit of holiness can be found in everything that takes place
between Israelite and stranger, between man and woman,
between slave and handmaiden.’”
Among the questions asked in light of the legends: “How in
Legend B is the idea expressed that all people are equal”,
and “it can be said that Legend C provides an explanation
and justification for anyone opposed to racialism and
discrimination. How?” (p. 39)
4. Summary exercise on the Book of Jonah – the students
are asked to bring examples of the major issues they dealt
with in studying the Book of Jonah:
”Is there any basis for the belief that people are capable of
changing?” “Are there moral values that the nations of the
world hold in common?” “Can human society exist with
laws alone or with compassion alone?” (p. 39)
The Book of Amos:
Amos’s prophecies deal mainly with criticism of moral and
social behavior in the kingdom of Israel. The activities
suggested in the workbook also encourage the students to
examine what is happening in our society today.
Examples:
1. “If Amos were living today, what social phenomena
would he prophesy as being harmful?”
“Do Amos’s admonitions remind you of incidents that
happened in our society (country)? (p. 79)
2. “Amos accuses the Samarian women of stealing and
exploiting. Imagine how contemporary feminists would
view Amos’s accusations? “Do you think that social
corruption and social gaps could weaken a country and a
society?” (p. 93)
3. “The prophet interprets current events in God’s
name…Amos and the people disagree strongly about the
interpretation of the events that happened then. a) Do similar
arguments still exist today about the interpretation of
events? b) Can you give contemporary examples of how a
social or political phenomenon is interpreted in different
ways?
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
In Chapter 3:2, Amos says “You only have I known of all
the families of the earth; Therefore I will punish you for all
your iniquities." The workbook relates to the fact that the
connection between God and Israel is dependent on the
people’s behavior. There is room to emphasize that being
the “Chosen People” does not give the people of Israel
special rights nor any position of superiority, but rather that
it demands moral behavior from the people. For this reason,
says Amos, the kingdom of Israel will be punished heavily
for its moral and social sins.
Name of Book: The first agricultural settlements – Chapters in the history of the
Yishuv (pre-state settlement), T. L. Publishers, Jerusalem, 1992
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1. p. 10: A girl and her family are fearful of immigrating to
the Land of Israel because there are very few Jews in the
country, and most of the inhabitants are Arabs, Bedouin and
nomads. (It should be pointed out that this is an innovation
in the Zionist discourse, for it is not stated that the Arabs are
aggressive and violent. Is this also evidence of a lack of
settlement continuity in the Land of Israel?) It is not pleasant
to live next to strangers.
2. p. 14: “The Arab porters” in Jaffa port.
3. The Turkish clerk frightened the daughter and apparently
the father as well. The Turk takes baksheesh in order to
allow entry into the country. “This is how it is in our
country” (p. 15).
4. p. 40: Today only Arabs work Israeli land. Work on the
land is for Arabs, the mother says to the father.
5. p. 12: Question 4 – The map clarifies who lives in
Nazareth and Jaffa, whether Jews or non-Jews, and the
names of the settlements in which non-Jews live.
6. p. 18: An Arab is selling “dates of India”, I was scared
they were poisonous, but the Jew who helped us before said
that it was alright – it’s date juice.
7. p. 31: There are no Jewish settlements on the map.
8. p. 35: A well-known Arab doctor living in Jaffa treats
people who contracted diseases in the Petach Tikva swamps.
9. p. 50: A photograph of Arab notables in traditional dress.
10. p. 49: A Jew working the land with a plow and a horse.
11. pp. 204-205: Pastoral scene with photographs of making
coffee and playing traditional musical instruments. There is
also the story of Arabs who trespassed on lands which
Petach Tikva residents used for grazing and for growing
corn.
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
Name of Book: The 19th century – Yesterday’s world, Center for Educational
Technology
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) p. 104: The Ottomans cruelly suppressed a revolt in the
Balkans, including the use of murder and robbery in addition
to military force.
2) Most of the inhabitants, traditional Muslims, opposed the
amendments and the granting of equal status to non-
Muslims.
3) p. 114: Hatred toward Israel in Algeria. Outbreaks during
the Dreyfus case in 1892 as well as anti-Semitic cartoons.
4) p. 193: It is unclear what happened to the Arabs of the
Land of Israel during the first world war.
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) Western winds of change penetrate the government of the
Ottoman Empire (p. 109). The equality accomplishments did
not, however, match the declarations.
2) The Ottoman authorities treated the Jews of the Empire
with tolerance, despite the fact that their legal status was
defined as being under guardianship (p. 110).
3) p. 111: The attitude to Jews is based on Christian anti-
Semitism, and some Jews preferred to flee to areas under
Ottoman control in order to benefit from the more tolerant
attitude toward them.
4) p. 143: A section dealing with the demography of the
Arabs of the Land of Israel prior to the First Immigration,
according to which 150-300 thousand Arabs live in the
country.
5) p. 144: A 1914 quote from a Jerusalem [Arab]
intellectual, Halil Sachanini – “The conquest of Palestine by
Zionism is the conquest of the soul of the Arab people…”
6) A map on page 147 denotes settlements with a mixed
population.
7) p. 161: The cover photograph of a memorial book of the
Hashomer [guards] Association. The rider on his horse is
wearing a keffiya (Arab head covering), holding his gun and
looking very brave. The text mentions that the Hashomer
guards replaced the Arab and Circassian guards, and that
this was part of the Jewish national liberation.
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
Name of Book: The beginnings of Zionism, T. L. Publications
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) Much attention is devoted to anti-Semitism (Chapters 1,
2, and 3), including the Dreyfus case and the Russian
pogroms.
2) p. 178: A section is called “The beginnings of the
decline”, claiming that from the Ottoman conquest the
country started to decline.
3) The map on p. 108 does not indicate Arab settlements, as
if they disappeared from the map on p. 78. (See also the map
on p. 121 which does not indicate Arab settlements).
4) pp. 139-141: An imaginary discussion describing the
purchase of land by the Zionists and the ostensibly willing
sale by wealthy Arabs to further their economic interests.
5) p. 167: The struggle of Hebrew labor against “the Jewish
farmer who supervises the Arab worker”, in which “the
Arab worker doesn’t know who we are and why we came”.
p. 169: “A tiresome struggle between the Arab worker and
the untrusting farmer…”
6) p. 180: “The Arab guards did not do their work
properly…the non-Jewish guards would be paid (by the
farmers) and would participate (with their friends) in
stealing and pilfering…”
7) pp. 183-184: The struggle over guarding and over the
ownership of land between the outsiders and the Arabs.
8) The Jews were known by the Arabs as “people who
should surely die”.
9) The description of Jaffa is harsh and one-sided,
mentioning only the filth and the stench, etc. From the story
on p. 195, it appears that Tel Aviv was established for the
simple reason that the Arab landlords raised the rent [in
Jaffa], in addition to the other daily difficulties the Jews
experienced.
- No attention is given to the status of the Arabs and to their
situation in relation to the stratification of Hebrew work, nor
to the question of the guarding of the new Jewish
settlements.
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) Map on p. 87: Arab settlements are indicated on a map of
the Land of Israel prior to 1881, and there are clearly more
Arab settlements than Jewish. In the text, however, the Arab
settlements are not mentioned, neither is the nature of Arab
settlement at the time.
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
Name of Book: Each man and his home – Published by Educational Programs
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) p. 8: “I don’t think that all the homes are buildings. For
example Bedouin live in tents and that’s their home. Also,
Chana, my mother’s friend, lives in a hut…”
2) p. 25: A drawing of a Bedouin desert encampment,
including camels and sheep. It is stated that there are people
in the desert who live in tents. No mention is made of the
fact that there are buildings in the Saudi Arabian desert.
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) p. 41: The Children of Israel in the desert are dressed like
Bedouin, ride on camels, and the tent is similar to a succah.
2) In some photographs (pp. 56-57) the children are wearing
skullcaps, while in other photographs they are not wearing
skullcaps (also see p. 62).
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
In the chapter dealing with apartments, a photograph and
text could be added on Arabs living in apartments in cities
and towns (p. 35), or a photograph of the Bedouin town of
Rahat.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
Photographs could be added of buildings in Arab villages or
cities in which Arabs live, as well as their characteristic
Eastern furniture.
Name of Book: “Our city of Jerusalem” – Workbook published by Am Oved,
1993
The book is tendentious and unbalanced. Sometimes the three religions are
mentioned, but there is no balance between them, and the tendency is to favor
Judaism and the Jews in Jerusalem. The pluralistic aspect of the city is ignored, while
its Jewish character is emphasized. No attention is devoted to the status of the Arabs
in the city nor to their historical and religious attachment to it. Lacking as well are the
elements of cooperation, a shared destiny, and an egalitarian and tolerant attitude.
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) p. 77, Section 5: “The holy places for us the Jews in the
Old City.”
Section 10: The proposed activity for the children –
“Prepare an album in the class of the Jewish holy places in
Jerusalem.”
2) The book does not deal with the Old City; there is only a
birds-eye view and no tour. The children are told not to walk
alone in the western city center (CBD), and not to go to the
Old City at all. Also on p. 27, reference is made to “places
on the map of Jerusalem” – none of the Arab neighborhoods
are mentioned.
3) Most of the examples point to the Jewish People’s deep
connection to the city, while ignoring the Arabs’ attachment
to the city, thereby furthering their delegitimization.
4) The book opens with the question of who is a
Jerusalemite. The three children answering are “Yaron,
Yael, and Rami” [Jewish names]. There is no mention of a
Palestinian child’s name.
5) p. 23: “…all those years Jews couldn’t visit the Western
Wall. Since the liberation of the Old City and the
reunification of Jerusalem in the six day war…” Use of the
words “liberation” and “reunification” are quite jarring.
6) p. 41: Map of The City of David and Mount Moriah.
Nowhere on this map is mention made of El-Kuds or of the
places holy to Arabs or to Islam.
7) p. 78: A section refers to “respect for others” with a quote
from the mayor that “the lifestyle in Jerusalem…the
Jerusalem municipality enables minorities to maintain their
own lifestyle”. The students are then asked: “Which
minorities was the mayor referring to?”. This appellation is
unacceptable. Why are the Arabs/Christians not referred to
as such, instead of the euphemism minorities.
8) p. 132: The children are asked to write a story: “I was a
child in the Jewish Quarter in the War of Independence”.
The assignment refers only to Jewish children. No mention
is made of the fact that there were also Arab children at that
time.
9) Chapter 8 deals with the capital of Israel and the city of
holy places. The chapter presents the Jerusalem Basic Law
uncritically and without any discussion on the implications
of a law of this kind. In Section C, the authors go even
further and write about “the eternal city of the Jewish
People”. Again, without critical examination of the
significance of “eternal” and of the place of the Arabs in this
“eternity”
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) p. 70: A chapter dealing with Jerusalem divided between
Israel and Jordan does not stress the unity, but rather
highlights the division.
2) With regard to Jerusalem neighborhoods, a differentiation
is made between neighborhoods built up to 1920, those built
between 1921 and 1948, between 1948 and 1967, and after
1967.
3) Some of the maps include Arab neighborhoods.
4) p. 16, question 4: “Examine what happened to Aelia
Capitolina, Jerusalem, and El Kuds. What do these names
mean, and which of them is still used today?”
5) A short section dealing with “a comparison of
neighborhoods”. The question is raised of what a mixed city
is, the explanation given is that “Jerusalem is a city in which
various ethnic, religious, and national groups live. Each
population group has its own beliefs, opinions, and
lifestyle”.
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Maps could be included showing:
- Arab neighborhoods.
- Jerusalem during the Ottoman Turkish period.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
Name of Book: A journey into the past – Greece, Rome, and Jerusalem,
Published by the Center for Educational Technology, 6th grade textbook.
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) p. 151: Jesus’ remarks about the behavior of the priests
aroused anger in Jerusalem. The high priest decides to hand
Jesus over to the Roman prefect on charges of rebellion
against Roman rule (this is the traditional story).
2) Since then, according to Christian belief, the Jewish
people is guilty of having crucified Jesus the Messiah, an
accusation that has passed from generation to generation and
has served as the basis of hatred of the Jews by the
Christians (p. 152).
3) pp. 161-162: Jerusalem as the center of world Jewry, a
destination for pilgrims, and a religious and economic center
for Diaspora Jewry.
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) p. 149: A complete chapter on Christianity, including the
story of Jesus’ life, the relationship between Jesus and the
Jewish community, quotations from the New Testament
such as “The Sermon on the Mount”: “Love your enemies,
bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you.”
2) p. 152: Only in the second half of the 20th century did the
Christian Church decide to renounce the blame placed on the
Jewish People for Jesus’ crucifixion.
3) “The new religion opened its doors to everyone…” p.154.
4) Details of the theological characteristics of Christianity,
including extensive details of the texts, the sacraments and
the organization of the Church.
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
The book does not deal with the Muslim Period and does not
mention Arab culture, because it did not exist before the 7th
century. Regarding Jerusalem – No one disputes the fact that
Jerusalem was the center for the Jewish people in the first
and third centuries BCE. The lack of reference to other
religions is thus legitimate.
Name of Book: A journey into Israeli democracy – Civics textbook,
T. L. Publications
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) p. 55: The illustration describes the Israeli-Palestinian in a
naïve, ambiguous manner, with a traditional head covering,
pondering whether to be loyal to “Israel or to the Arab
states”.
2) pp. 67-77: Discussion on the weighty questions
concerning the areas over the Green Line.
3) Map of the Land of Israel connects the Book of Joshua to
the State of Israel today.
4) p. 70: The war of 1948 is called the War of Independence
and the fate of the Palestinian population is not mentioned.
What is mentioned is that Jordan annexed the West Bank
between 1948-1967 and did not establish an independent
state for Israeli Arabs.
5) Concerning the citizens’ obligations, the exemption from
army service given to Yeshiva students and Arabs is
mentioned, without indicating the reason for the exemption.
6) p. 26: Deals with the status of residents who do not have
citizenship – Palestinians in the occupied territories are not
mentioned.
7) p. 54: Attitudes of Israeli men and women who speak of
the difficulty of being loyal to the country and of their
contacts with the Palestinian people and the Arab world.
8) p. 65: The State of Israel, the Jewish national home.
National minorities are not mentioned as part of the
definition of the state.
9) p. 149: Question 10: “An Arab throws a stone…and a Jew
throws a stone…who will be punished more severely? The
question aims to clarify the concept of equality, but the
example is tendentious.
10) p. 19: In the section dealing with the creation of new
countries, Palestine is not mentioned, even as a footnote.
Israel too is not mentioned.
11) The use of the term “Judea, Samaria and the Gaza
Region” pp. 78-80 confers legitimacy on these areas.
12) p. 88: Activity No. 4. “The Citizenship Law”. The
problematic nature of this right should be clarified. No
attention is given to the ramifications of this law for the
Arab minority.
13) p. 91: “The country’s Arab citizens are entitled to the
full civil rights granted to Jewish Israeli citizens, but in
certain areas this is not the case”. These areas should be
discussed.
14) p. 105: Discussion on the Proclamation of
Independence: “The State of Israel will be a Jewish and
democratic state based on the principles of freedom,
equality, and justice for all its Jewish and Arab inhabitants”.
There is no in-depth discussion on the gap between the
vision and the reality.
15) p. 113: The students undertake an activity on the subject
of “living with dignity”. The examples presented are from
Sierra Leone or Indonesia, and none from our region.
16) p. 129: An in-depth discussion on the question: “When
is it necessary to infringe on a citizen’s rights in order to
protect other citizens.” Again the examples are from abroad,
or more specifically from the United States. There seems to
be a fear of dealing with local examples.
17) p. 238: A chapter that deals with “the media and the
rights of the individual”. There are no examples from the
Israeli media connected to freedom of speech for the Arab
minority in the country.
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) p. 156, question 11: A university inaugurated a
department of aeronautical engineering. It was proposed that
Druze and Arabs not be permitted to study in the
department. The issue is one of discrimination – social
equality and the prohibition against discrimination.
2) p. 288: The passing of the Human Dignity and Liberty
Law is mentioned.
3) pp. 78-80: Discussion on the future of the occupied
territories.
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
Name of Book: The history of Israel and the nations – Part 2 – For State
education schools – T. L. Publications
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) p. 286, Section 47: On the attitude of the Christian
Church to the Jews, and the humiliation the Jews were
exposed to. It should be mentioned that there is much
evidence that this was in fact the Church’s attitude, and the
textbook thus cannot be accused of being exceptionally
biased.
2) Chapter X – Violent hatred of Israel during the Crusades
(p. 341).
Section 58 – Disturbances and expulsion – p. 354, the
expulsion of Jews from England.
Section 59 – The Expulsion from Spain.
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
The book devotes a number of chapters to familiarizing the
students with the principles of the two great religions, and
the history of their development as a religion and as a
worldwide organization.
Chapter IV, p. 143: On Christianity, including comments on
the missionary attitude adopted to anyone who was different
from them.
Section 28, p. 176: On the Arabs before Mohammed.
Section 30, p. 186: The foundations of Islam, the Five
Commandments, architectural and artistic characteristics,
etc. On the Koran: the explanation is not particularly
detailed but it is neutral. The pilgrimage to Mecca is also
explained.
Section 31, p. 197: On the Islamic conquest and the spread
of Islam.
Chapter VI: Deals entirely with the period of Ottoman rule
and the attitude of the rulers to the Jews in Babylon, Spain,
and throughout the Empire.
p. 220: The Jewish inhabitants were considered as inferior,
but the authorities did not interfere in their internal life.
Section 38, p. 237: On the Jewish cultural flourishing in
Spain and the positive encounter between Jews and
Muslims.
Chapter VII – Christian Europe in the Middle Ages. The
chapter deals with the papacy, the principles of Christianity,
the organization of the Christian Church, the role of the
priest, etc.
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
Name of Book: Language tells the culture – “Ela Vesitra”, Books A, B, and C
The books teach Arabic and the culture most connected to it, i.e. Islam. In general, the
contents of the booklets are adequate and comprehensive, and there is an attempt to
familiarize the students with the components and contents of modern Arab culture and
the sources of the Islamic religion. The material relates positively to the Dome of the
Rock and its status in the eyes of the Muslim population. In its current form, the series
contributes to pluralism and inter-cultural tolerance.
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) Throughout the booklets the close comparison between
Arabic and Hebrew clearly conveys a message of equality,
similarity, and linguistic and cultural affinity. The language
differences are clear but not emphasized. An attempt is also
made to teach the students the rudiments of Arabic language
and writing (p. 110).
2) Children’s names or the names of places in which Arabs
lived before 1948, and the situation after 1967 are not
hidden, yet they do not have a political connotation. The
emphasis is far more on the cultural aspect.
Book A:
1) The maps on pages 61 and 71 present an intelligent and
sophisticated question: “Which is the smallest country?”.
This leads every Israeli student to the conclusion the
Lebanon is the smallest country in the Middle East and not
Israel as is usually thought.
2) p. 71: A description of the three monotheistic religions in
Jerusalem.
3) p. 82: Examples and photographs are presented from all
the places that are holy to the three religions. This attests to
a pluralistic approach and of mutual respect between the
different groups. Also on p. 83 there is an explanation of the
words El Kuds, an alternative name for Jerusalem that was
created in the 10th century and is still used today. The name
is derived from the Arabic source meaning “the holy of
holies”.
4) p. 86: The explanation of the word “Arab” – both the
question and the answer are objective, to the point, and
balanced.
Book C:
1) p. 89: An Arabic literary extract is presented, which
points to a positive attitude toward modern Arabic.
2) Many activities direct the students to the Koran. p. 149:
“Find details in the following extract from the Koran that do
not appear on the identity card…” This creates a positive
attitude to the Koran, as well as enriching the students’
knowledge about the Koran. Also on pp. 150-155, the
students are presented with examples from the first chapter
of the Koran.
3) p. 100: A full section on the importance of the Dome of
the Rock for Muslims. The elaboration of the importance is
not, however, limited to Muslims, for it is stated: “The area
under the Temple Mount where the Dome of the Rock is
located is holy to Jews and to Muslims. Jerusalem thus
constitutes the core of the conflict between Israel and the
Arab world in general, and between Israel and the
Palestinians in particular.”
4) p. 101: A section details the Muslim festivals.
5) p. 110: A complete section on “the beginnings of the
Arab language and writing”, which is an attempt to
familiarize the students with how Arabic evolved.
Booklet A:
p. 130: The students are invited to discuss the following
issues: “The Middle East is a region in which there have
always been conflicts between nations; Israel should allow
Arabs from neighboring countries to pass through its
territory; Arab countries are very interested in signing a
peace treaty with Israel; the holy places should be an area
under United Nations control; the region’s borders should be
open to all the region’s inhabitants; the countries in the
region should issue a joint currency, similar to the Euro,
which all the countries in the region will trade in.”
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
Name of Book: Getting to know the Bedouin in the desert / Readings
The book presents the Bedouin encampment and the Bedouins’ current occupations in
the city by means of photographs and drawings.
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
pp. 4-5: The children experience certain aspects of Bedouin
life such as building a tent, an activity which creates affinity
between the two people/cultures.
- An extended discussion on the nature of the desert, which
does not dwell on the fixed and stigmatic connection
between the Bedouin and the desert, a connection that many
Bedouin and non-Bedouin Arabs feel creates socio-
economic discrimination (Chapter 1).
- p. 22: The Bedouin tent seems ramshackle, but the students
are provided with explanations about the types of tents, the
types of materials, how the tent is built, and life inside the
tent.
p. 88: A positive message emerges from the story about
Bedouin customs of hospitality – “Bedouins like coffee, like
to grind it, and like to host guests..”
- No negative attitudes toward Jews or other nationalities are
attributed to the Bedouin. They are considered as good and
honest hosts.
- Current Jewish settlement in the desert is not presented,
nor the modern version of “making the desert bloom”.
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
Name of Book: Our homeland – Published by the Educational Television
The book maintains a balanced and tolerant attitude toward the other side.
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
- The description of the country as an unpopulated
wilderness conveys a false image with highly negative
implications for the children and the local inhabitants.
pp. 8-9: While the word “wilderness” is used, the
photographs attest to the existence of settlements and of life
within them. There is a contradiction but not an unequivocal
statement that this is a wilderness. Possibly the Hebrew
word “desolate” captures the ambiguity.
p. 87: There are statements that accuse the Arabs of
attacking small settlements established by the Jews, but the
language used is not particularly violent. The feeling is not
that of an armed confrontation, and certainly not a national,
but rather a local struggle . “…the Arabs attacked the
agricultural settlements from time to time, but were repulsed
by the guards. Guards, farmers, and workers were killed, but
the important idea was the fact…”
- The major emphasis was on building and developing the
new Jewish settlements. Examples on pp. 106-107, and
p. 134.
- Map on p. 65: “Map of the Land of Israel at the beginning
of the 19th century”. Not a single Arab settlement is
indicated.
p. 54: “The wagon was harnessed to a camel, and sometimes
two, which the Arabs found quite astonishing” – that is to
say, the Jews appear as more developed and cultured than
the Arabs.
p. 95: “The Hashomer organization attributed particular
importance to peaceful relations with the Arab
environment”. The relationship between Hashomer and the
local Arab population was ambivalent and problematic. In
order to present a balanced objective picture, the relationship
between the two sides needs to be understood.
- No attention is devoted to the status of the Arabs in the
country.
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
p. 14: Mentions that there are places in the country that are
holy to the three religions. “Do you think there are cities that
are holy to the three religions?” Also, “What are the houses
of worship of the three most common religions in the
country called?”. From the above, there seems to be a
positive attitude toward pluralism.
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Suggestions for
improvement / change
- There is a lack of consideration of the situation of the local
Arab population during this period, especially in light of the
policy of purchasing land and of expanding Jewish
settlement in the country.
- The pattern of relationships between Jews and Arabs
during the early years of Jewish settlement could be
elaborated (beyond what is dealt with on p. 45).
Name of Book: Journey to the kibbutz – Readings on the history of pre -state
settlement
The strong general trend in the book is to emphasize the Zionist enterprise, the
Jewishness of the new settlers, and the connection between the Land of Israel and the
Zionist Movement. The book encourages intolerance and a lack of pluralism, and does
little to further partnership, coexistence, or mutual respect.
Examples of an
ambiguous or negative
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) A highly negative, tendentious stereotypical and even
monstrous description of the Arabs (p. 38). “A group of
Arabs appearing suddenly on the deck, put an end to our joy.
They were truly terrifying: their upper bodies were naked,
they wore wide trousers and wide red belts on their hips. On
their heads they wore small skullcaps. From the moment
they appeared, they didn’t stop shouting. They ran like
madmen on the deck, grabbed the suitcases and piled them
up. They behaved with terrible rowdiness and I was sure that
they were pirates…” And on the same page: “And then a
giant Arab passed by, a real Samson, holding a child’s hand,
who out of fear managed to shout. In his other hand he held
a large box and on his back he carried a heavy package…he
took my white hand in his black hand and growled a few
times hada hada.”
2) Map on p. 47: No Arab villages are indicated in the
mountain region.
3) p. 53: Historical facts about the Jewish minority that can
be interpreted in various ways.
4) A distinction is made between “Hebrew” work and
“Arab” work, and the following quotation reveals the
intention: “The Jews are struggling to meet [the challenge]
of work and defense, Hebrew hands will build the land and
not Arab hands” p. 66. Also on pages 62-63, the following
dialogue appears: “And who is working in the fields?”
“Arabs”, “And what are the Jews doing?” “Managing the
work, supervising”, “I am shocked. Is this how our country
will be built? The Jews will provide the work and the work
itself will be done for them by Arabs, and I dreamed of a
different Land of Israel, a land in which Jews work the land
and enjoy the fruits of their labors. I won’t allow foreigners
to build my land”. In other words, the Arabs are a foreign
element that should be removed from the labor market.
Page 15 – Shaul Tchernichovsky’s poem “I believe”. This
poem conveys a lack of consideration for and a disregard of
the other side, especially as the poet’s wish is “then my
people as well will return and flourish, and a generation will
arise in the land, the iron chains will be removed, the light
will be seen clearly”. In other words, the wish is for a lively
and fruitful future, without relating to the “other” living in
the country.
6) The fear is expressed that the Jews will leave the country,
while simultaneously the presence of others who live in this
country is negated: “The emissary told us that the situation
in the Jewish villages is precarious. Arab workers are
working in them and if we don’t go and work in them, the
Jews will leave the villages and we will lose the land. I was
happy to finally find a person who would clarify for me
what I have to do in life…”
7) The description of Jaffa, the bustling Arab city, is
couched in negative terms: “Jaffa, with its Eastern look, did
not make a good impression on me…its streets are narrow
and dirty, the peddlers are boisterous, the camels walk
slowly on the street, and the signs are in Arabic – all these
left me with the feeling that I wasn’t in the Land of Israel.
Arabic and Arabs and where are the Jews? Arabs and Arabic
– and where is Hebrew?
8) The predominant attitude in the book toward the Arabs is
ethnocentric and patronizing: “I don’t want you to dirty your
hands and to humiliate yourself by working. I won’t give
you work because I am protecting your dignity…” (p. 64)
9) Arabs planting a forest in memory of Herzl is described
as a shock: “And we learned that in Ben Shemen adjacent to
the city of Lod, Arab workers are employed to plant a forest
in Herzl’s memory. We were shocked. How is it possible? A
forest to the memory of the great leader on the nation’s land
planted with Arab work. We saw this as a desecration of
Herzl’s memory. We demanded the work supervisor to
employ only Jews.” That is to say, in this case there is also
delegitimization and negation of the Arabs, especially in the
area of work, and an attempt to evict them from the labor
market. When the work supervisor in this story fires the
Arab workers, this is perceived as an achievement (pp. 100-
101).
10) This trend continues on page 144: “You recall that my
friends from Ben Shemen, who came with me to the Galilee,
moved to the Kinneret farm. They continued to live
cooperatively, worked the land, and enjoyed the good life
the Galilee provided them. Everything went well until one
day the work supervisor hired Arabs to work on the farm.
My friends objected and spoke to the manager of the farm,
but when this didn’t help they declared a strike and left the
farm in protest…”.
11) p. 261: The book gives a good example of the methods
of “redeeming the land”: “They even bought their working
tools with their own money and didn’t wait for the
institutions to give them money. They knew that if they
didn’t hurry to settle the place, the Arabs living in the
vicinity were liable to start cultivating the land, which would
make it very difficult to remove them.
The Jewish National Fund also bought land which then
belonged to it in most legal way possible. Does this sound
strange? It was the law in those days and that is how one had
to behave.”
Examples of a positive
approach toward
pluralism / tolerance /
peace
1) p. 252: Ruppin did not content himself with establishing
Degania. As the person responsible for Zionist settlement in
the country, he took care of buying land that was put up for
sale. He specially tried to buy land located far from Arab
settlements, preferring swamps and sand dunes so as not to
incur the envy of the Arab inhabitants. He also gave the
Arabs permission to continue drawing water from the
springs in areas that he bought, and hoped, through this
gesture, to maintain good neighborly relations…”
Themes / areas in
which examples could
be added to express a
positive attitude
toward pluralism /
tolerance / and peace.
Suggestions for
improvement / change