Evaluation Report for FY 2009-2010 13-06-11

8/6/2019 Evaluation Report for FY 2009-2010 13-06-11

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluation-report-for-fy-2009-2010-13-06-11 1/74

OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER—————

REPORT

ON

EVALUATION OF THEPERFORMANCE

OF

PUBLIC AGENCIES

FOR THE

FINANCIAL YEAR 2009/2010

June, 2011



ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOREWORD......................................................................... iv

PREFACE............................................................................ viii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................... x

CHAPTER ONE .................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 1

CHAPTER TWO ................................................................... 4 THE PROCESS OF PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING ANDEVALUATION ................................................................................... 4

CHAPTER THREE ............................................................... 5 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY....................... 5

CHAPTER FOUR.................................................................. 6 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS.................................... 6

4.1 Ministries/Departments .............................................................. 6 4.2 State Corporations...................................................................... 7 4.3 Local Authorities........................................................................ 8 4.4 Tertiary Institutions .................................................................... 9

CHAPTER FIVE.................................................................. 11 LESSONS LEARNT ..........................................................................11

5.1 Guidelines and Methodology.....................................................11 5.2 Impact on the Ground................................................................11 5.3 Process of Performance Contracts Negotiation and Evaluation..11

CHAPTER SIX .................................................................... 13 OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS ANDWAY FORWARD..............................................................................13

6.1 Observations .........................................................................13 6.2 Conclusions ..........................................................................13 6.3 Recommendations.................................................................13 6.4 Way Forward .......................................................................14

ANNEXES ............................................................................ 15

ANNEX I............................................................................... 16 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION GUIDELINES.............................16

ANNEX II ............................................................................. 20 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS FORMINISTRIES/DEPARTMENTS.........................................................20

ANNEX III............................................................................ 22 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS FOR STATECORPORATIONS…..........................................................................22



iii

ANNEX IV............................................................................ 32 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS FOR STATECORPORATIONS BY FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY ……… .. …….32

ANNEX V ............................................................................. 43 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS FOR LOCALAUTHORITIES..................................................................................43

ANNEX VI............................................................................ 49 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS FOR LOCALAUTHORITIES BY CATEGORY................................................................................49

ANNEX VII .......................................................................... 56 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS FOR TERTIARYINSTITUTIONS.................................................................................56

ANNEX VIII......................................................................... 60 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS OF TERTIARYINSTITUTIONS BY PARENT MINISTRY ........... .............. ........ ......60



iv

FOREWORD

On the occasion to release the performance evaluation results for all publicagencies in April last year, I made reference to the great lengths countriesare going, to create global competitiveness for their economies, in the faceof rapidly decreasing resources. I also made reference to a number of professional and moral rituals that our governance system was beingsubjected to, to enable the country to find its rightful niche in the globaleconomic race.

Many of these precepts subsequently found their way into the newConstitution, and are therefore well on the way to full implementation.Chapters 4, 6, 11, 12 and 13 of the new Constitution are particularlypertinent in this regard.

Cognizant of the need to sustain the momentum of performanceimprovement, and the significance of the Constitutional provisions, myoffice has moved swiftly to consolidate the gains realized since the reformagenda in general was conceived in 1993, and the inception of performance contracting in particular, in 2004, in order to fully buttress theperformance improvement momentum. A number of significant milestoneshave been attained in this regard. These include the following:

1. Incorporation, early in 2005, of the Customer Service DeliveryCharter in the performance contracts for all service oriented andregulatory public agencies;

2. Rolling out of Customer Service Delivery Charters to 16institutions which interface directly with the grass root Mwananchi.The roll-out of Charters is in the process of being expanded tocover other ‘front-office’ agencies of the Government;

3. Piloting of the “ e-service delivery” project with the Ministry of Immigration and Registration of Persons to fast-track processing of national Identity Cards and Passports. This is a tripartite programto track processing of the two documents, including possiblequeries and complaints during the process. The tripartite axiscomprises the public (customer), Government agency, and thePerformance Contracting Department, to which communication

between the two is looped, to facilitate tracking of customersatisfaction. The “ e-service delivery” project will be extended toother service institutions as they finalize their back-officeautomation;



v

4. Stakeholder engagement to partner in tracking implementation of the service charters. My office has initiated programs to involvecivil society in this regard;

5. Partnering with the Public Complaints Standing Committee to track public complaints using the Service Charter as the service deliverystandards benchmark;

6. Movement from haphazard identification of performance indicatorsand setting of targets to the development of a clear set of SectorPerformance Standards, based on international best practices;

7. Carried out a nation-wide customer satisfaction survey early thisyear, which indicated a Customer Satisfaction Index of 63.5%,which compares favorably with those of New Zealand (68% in2007) and Canada (67% in 2005) which also used the CommonMeasurement Tool (CMT) to carry out the survey;

8. Movement from a manual version of target setting, vetting andevaluation to an automated platform, which was applied for thefirst time this year, resulting in enormous savings in time andfunds, in addition to improving accuracy and efficiency;

9. The process of negotiating performance contracts has alsowitnessed a revolution, up from a situation where ad hoc Task Force Members would handle individual institutions, to the currentpractice of joint negotiation by sectors, which has assisted ineliciting and drawing on collective synergies to achieve the nowcommonly shared Vision 2030;

10. Further, the Performance Contracting Department in my office haslaunched an ambitious program to train and cascade thePerformance Management system, including the Service DeliveryCharters, to all the districts in the country. The program is a jointventure between the Government of Kenya on the one hand, andthe UNDP and other development partners who contribute tobasket funds, on the other. Under the program, a total of 8,200Provincial and District Departmental Heads, ConstituencyDevelopment Funds officials and Civil Society were trainedbetween 1st November 2010 and 2nd March, 2011;

11. In addition, my office, through the Performance Contracting

Department, Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Planning,National Development and Vision 2030, is preparing to roll out“Target Sector Hearings” in order to secure public participationand ownership in the process of target setting, and to create a clear



vi

linkage between the processes of planning, budgeting and results.This is an initiative where Permanent Secretaries will be requiredto subject their performance indicators and targets to publicscrutiny before securing exchequer finance and signingperformance contracts.

These are the elements that create the pedestal for the mandate of myoffice, particularly the element of supervising the performance of publicinstitutions. They also constitute the launch pad for the achievement of Vision 2030. But even as we celebrate the results of the 7th Cycleperformance contracts, I am concerned that a number of key publicinstitutions have not found the need to join the larger fraternity of publicinstitutions in embracing performance contracts. The National Bank of Kenya and the Development Bank of Kenya are institutions in point. As Ihave said in the past, implementation of performance contracts is notselective policy which excepts some public agencies. Supervision of theperformance of public institutions by my office, revolves around theperformance contracting system; this system is not optional. The wholecountry will henceforth be expecting to see all public offices andinstitutions, including the Central Bank of Kenya, signing performancecontracts.

There are a number of offices and groups I wish to acknowledge for thesuccesses my office has realized so far, in the propagation and

implementation of performance contracting.My gratitude goes first to His Excellency the President for remainingsteadfast in his support of the performance contracting process. ThePermanent Secretary/ Secretary to the Cabinet and Head of the PublicService and my Permanent Secretary, for ensuring sustained impetus in thegrowth of the system, which now covers 470 public agencies.

Accolades are due too, to our Permanent Secretaries, Chairmen and Chief Executives of State Corporations, Chairmen, Mayors and Clerks of LocalAuthorities, Chancellors, Vice Chancellors and Chairmen of Councils of our Public Universities, Chairmen and Principals of Tertiary Institutions,

and indeed all public officers, for the sustained enthusiasm with whichthey have embraced the system.

I wish too, to pay particular tribute to the ad hoc Task Force Members, theexternal pool of experts who have served to impart credibility and





viii

PREFACE

Evaluation of the performance of all public institutions on performancecontract for the 2009/10 Financial Year (excepting institutions whosefinancial year is the calendar year) was completed in October 2010.

Over a relatively short period of time, the evaluation process andmethodology have gone through radical evolution. First, early in 2010, asmall team of IT experts from the Office of the Prime Minister, thePerformance Contracting Department, the Directorate of e-Governmentand the Ministry of Local Government set out to automate the processes of target setting, negotiation and vetting of performance contracts, and theevaluation methodology.

The team succeeded in automating the inputting and substitution processesin target setting, negotiation and vetting of performance contracts but,more significantly, was able to break down a hitherto complexmeasurement formula to an automated platform. The team proceeded tocapture performance contract matrices of all public institutions, includingthe indicators and targets, in the platform. All that public institutions arerequired to do then is to fill in the “achievement” column in these matricesand obtain the composite score at the touch of a button. As a result, outsidethe moderation period at which evidence of achievement is examined, theentire performance evaluation process for all public institutions for the2009/10 FY took three weeks, a far cry from the over four months that itused to take before automation. The extended benefit of the automationwas the dramatic reduction of ad hoc Evaluation Task Force membersfrom over 100 to only 18!

Secondly, the evaluation formula has been improved to make it possible tocompute the criteria range and to eliminate repeated use of disparate“upper/lower” criteria value and disparate spans. This has made theformula even more user friendly. The process of automation is continuousand the next frontier is:

1. Making the process fully web-based to minimize the need for lengthyinter-personal interventions, thereby saving valuable managementtime;

2. Rolling out software for real-time monitoring of performance andproject implementation;

3. Improvement of the performance contracting system as a whole is adynamic process which continuously incorporates new value-addingconcepts and global developments in performance management.

I wish to take the opportunity to thank all those who make it possible tosustain the process. First and foremost my gratitude goes to His Excellency



ix

the President and the Rt. Hon. Prime Minister, for tirelessly stoking themomentum to keep the process alive, and colleague Permanent Secretariesfor steadying it from the driving seat. My appreciation goes too to allpublic officials for successfully implementing the system and living with itsince 2004, and the ad hoc Task Force members for a most valuablePublic/Private Partnership. Our Development Partners, particularly UNDPunder the basket funding, and on an individual note, the SIDA, haveworked closely with the Performance Contracting Department and aretruly partners to a success story.

RICHARD E. NDUBAI, C.B.S.,Permanent Secretary.

Nairobi, 16th June, 2011.



x

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The policy decision to introduce Performance Contracts in themanagement of the Public Service was conveyed in the EconomicRecovery Strategy for Wealth and Employment Creation (ERS), (2003-2007).

The process began in October 2004 when 16 pilot State Corporationssigned and implemented Performance Contracts. In the Financial Year,2008/2009, a total of 425 Agencies (43 Ministries/Departments, 139 StateCorporations, 175 Local Authorities and 68 Tertiary Institutions) signedand implemented Performance Contracts. Two (2) Ministries/Departmentsdid not sign Performance Contracts during the year under review. TheFinancial Year 2009/2010 is the sixth year of full scale implementation of Performance Contracts in the Public Service by all Government

Ministries/Departments, State Corporations, Local Authorities and TertiaryInstitutions.

For the Financial Year 2009/2010, the process of evaluation andmoderation was made much easier through automation. With support fromofficers from e-Government, the Performance Contracting Department wasable to develop a Performance Contracting Management and TrackingSystem, hereinafter referred to as The System. The Agencies were able toundertake self evaluation and were moderated by members of the Ad-HocEvaluation team.

In the Financial Year 2009/2010, none of the Ministries/Departments,State Corporations, Local Authorities and Tertiary Institutions achievedthe “ Excellent” 1 grade.

For the Ministries/Departments, 31, representing 68.9 per cent, attained the“Very Good ”2 grade while 14, representing 31.1 per cent, achieved the“Good” 3 grade. None of the Ministries/Departments attained the “ Fair ”4or the “ Poor ”5 grades.

Out of 162 State Corporations that were evaluated, 105, representing 64.8per cent, achieved the “ Very Good ” grade and 52, representing 32.1 percent, achieved the “ Good ” grade. One (1) State Corporation, representingone 0.6 per cent, achieved “ Fair ” grade and four (4) representing 2.5 percent, attained “ Poor ” grade.

For footnotes 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, see the Performance Evaluation Guidelines in Annex 1 of

this report.



xi

Out of the 175 Local Authorities that were evaluated, none was in the“Excellent” grade. Twenty one (21), representing 12 per cent, achievedthe “ Very Good ” grade. A total of 128 Local Authorities, representing73.1 per cent, achieved the “ Good ” grade. Five (5) Local Authorities,representing 2.9 per cent, and 21 Local Authorities, representing 21 percent, achieved the “Fair” and “ Poor ” grades respectively.

Out of the 61 Tertiary Institutions, 24, representing 39.3 per cent, achieved“Very Good ” grade, Thirty six (36), representing 59.1 per cent, achieved“Good ” grade. None of the Tertiary Institutions achieved the “ Fai r” whileone (1) representing 1.6 per cent achieved the “ Poor ” grade.

Over the last six years of the implementation of Performance Contracts byPublic Agencies, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the Agencieshave embraced the Performance Contracting Strategy as shown by

improved performance. Further, the implementation of the strategy hasalso enhanced service delivery. From the results, it is clear that sustainedapplication of the Performance Contracting Strategy is a necessary pre-requisite for streamlining the management and operations of the PublicService so as to work better more efficiently. However, for the Strategy tobe fully integrated and become effective, it is imperative that it isextended to all institutions within the three arms of Government andcascaded to all levels.





2

4. On 15th January, 2004, the Government, vide Cabinet Memo No.CAB(03)115, directed that all Permanent Secretaries/AccountingOfficers of Ministries/Departments and Chief Executive Officers of State Corporations be placed on Performance Contracts by June2004.

5. To roll out the strategy, the Government established the PerformanceContracts Steering Committee (PCSC) in August 2003. TheCommittee was gazetted on 8th April, 2005. The PCSC is responsiblefor the overall administration and coordination of PerformanceContracts in the public service. In the process of implementingperformance contracts, the Committee is assisted by an Ad-HocNegotiation/Evaluation Task Force comprising experts drawn fromoutside the public service. The Ad-Hoc Task Forces are responsiblefor negotiating Performance Contracts, evaluating and moderatingperformance of Ministries/Departments on behalf of the PermanentSecretary, Secretary to the Cabinet and Head of Public Service. TheAd-Hoc Evaluation Task Force also evaluates and moderates theperformance of State Corporations, Local Authorities and TertiaryInstitutions.

6. Performance Contracts were first introduced on 1st October, 2004 in16 largely commercial State Corporations. In 2005/2006, all the then35 Government Ministries/Departments, 116 State Corporations andfive pilot Local Authorities signed Performance Contracts and wereevaluated in September 2006. In 2006/2007, all the 38 GovernmentMinistries/Departments, 127 State Corporations and 175 LocalAuthorities signed Performance Contracts and were evaluated inOctober 2007. During 2007/2008 all the 38 GovernmentMinistries/Departments, 130 State Corporations and 175 LocalAuthorities signed Performance Contracts and were evaluated inOctober 2008. Evaluation of performance in respect of the FinancialYear 2008/2009 involved 45 Ministries/Departments, 139 StateCorporations, 175 Local Authorities and 68 Tertiary Institutions.During the FY 2009/2010, 45 Ministries/Departments, 156 StateCorporations, 175 Local Authorities and 61 Tertiary Institutionssigned Performance contracts and were evaluated.

7. With the introduction of Performance Contracting and TrackingManagement System, the process of evaluation and moderationinvolved two steps. The first step involved self evaluation by eachAgency using the Automated System. The second step involvedmoderation of the results of each Agency based on the concreteevidence availed by each Agency. The self evaluation and themoderation were conducted at the same venue for each category of the Ministries/ Departments, State Corporations and Tertiary



3

Institutions. For the local Authorities the Moderators met with theCouncils in five centres- Kisumu, Nakuru, Embu, Mombasa andNairobi.

8. This report is divided into six chapters. Chapter One covers theintroduction; Chapter Two contains the process of performancecontracting and evaluation; Chapter Three contains the performanceevaluation methodology; Chapter Four contains the performanceevaluation results of Ministries/Departments, State CorporationsLocal Authorities and Tertiary Institutions; Chapter Five contains thelessons learnt, and Chapter Six contains the observations,conclusions, recommendations and the way forward.



4

CHAPTER TWO

THE PROCESS OF PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING ANDEVALUATION

9. The Performance Contracting Department has continued to developtools and instruments for implementing Performance Contracts andevaluating performance which include: subsidiary legislations forState Corporations and Local Authorities; Model PerformanceContracts; Performance Contracts Matrices; Training Manuals andInformation Booklets; Guidelines for Drafting and ImplementingPerformance Contracts and Evaluation of Performance. Of particularsignificance, has been the Automation of the evaluation andmoderation process as an instrument for enhancing efficiency,harmony, accountability and saving on the time taken for evaluation

and moderation.10. With Automation of the evaluation and moderation process, the

number of the members of the Ad-Hoc Task Force was reducedconsiderably as well as the time taken for the self evaluation andmoderation. A total of 18 Ad-Hoc members were involved in theevaluation and moderation of all the Agencies. Six (6) officers frome-Government worked closely with five (5) officers from thePerformance Contracting Department to provide the Technicalexpertise on the automated system. With this set up the moderationof Ministries/ Departments took only three (3) days, that of StateCorporations took four (4) days, that of Tertiary Institutions took two(2) days and that of the 175 Local Authorities took only 9 days. This

definitely represents a huge saving on Time and Funds whileenhancing efficiency and effectiveness of the process. The processwas undertaken in accordance with the Sixth Cycle EvaluationGuidelines ( Annex I ).

11. For the purpose of continuous monitoring and reporting onperformance, Public Agencies are required to file quarterly andannual performance reports in prescribed formats. Performanceevaluation for each public agency is based on the signed PerformanceContract and the Annual Performance Report.



5

CHAPTER THREE

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY12. Evaluation of the performance of Public Agencies entails the rating of

actual achievements against performance targets negotiated andagreed upon at the beginning of the financial year. The resultantdifferences are resolved into raw scores, weighted scores andultimately denominated into Composite Scores. The performancerating of the institutions is based on the following attributes andcriteria:

Attribute Criteria

Excellent - Achievement between 30% and 100% above target.Very Good - Achievement of the set target in the performancecontract up to 129.99% of the target.

Good - Achievement between 70% and 99.99% of the set targetFair - Achievement between 50% and 69.99% of the targetPoor - Achievement between 0% and 49.99% of the target

Performance rated as Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair or Poor isaccordingly translated into a composite score as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 – Performance and Composite Score

Composite ScorePerformance GradeUpper - Lower

Excellent 1.00 - 1.49Very Good 1.50 - 2.49Good 2.50 - 3.49Fair 3.50 - 3.59Poor 3.60 - 5.00

The complete set of the Guidelines used for evaluation of performanceduring the Financial Year 2009/2010 are shown in Annex I.



6

CHAPTER FOUR

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS

4.1 Ministries/Departments13. A total of 45 Ministries/Departments signed Performance Contracts

for the period starting 1st July, 2009 and ending 30th June, 2010 andwere evaluated in September 2010.

Table 2 - Performance of Ministries/Departments by GradePerformance Grade Number PercentageExcellent 0 0Very Good 31 68.9Good 14 31.1Fair 0 0Poor 0 0Total 45 100

The complete list of Ministries/Departments, indicating the CompositeScores and the ranking is shown in Annex II.

14. The best 10 performing Ministries are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 – Best Performing Ministries/DepartmentsNo. Ministry Composite

Score

1. Ministry of Planning, National Development andVision 2030 2.1010

2. Ministry of Gender, Children and SocialDevelopment

2.1096

3. Cabinet Office 2.1121

4. Ministry of Energy 2.1145

5. Public Service Commission 2.1338

6. Ministry of Water and Irrigation 2.1756

7. Ministry of Public Works 2.1889

8. Ministry of State for Public Service 2.1990

9. Ministry of Lands 2.2132

10. Ministry of Agriculture 2.2192



7

4.2 State Corporations

15. A total of 162 State Corporations that were on Performance Contractswere evaluated. In addition, the following four (4) State Corporationsdid not sign Performance Contracts during the year under review.

1. Geothermal Development Company2. Kenya Investment Authority3. Water Appeals Board4. Kenya Sisal Board

Kenya National Assurance Company (2000) Ltd has now adopted thenormal Government Financial Year and its performance will beevaluated at the end of the FY 2011/12.

The performance evaluation results are shown in Table 4.

Table 4 - Performance of State Corporations by Grade

PerformanceGrade

Number Percentage

Excellent 0 0Very Good 105 64.8Good 52 32.1Fair 1 0.6Poor 4 2.5Total 162 100

16. The complete listing of State Corporations indicating the compositescores and ranking is shown in Annex III. The top ten performing

State Corporations are shown in Table 5.Table 5 - Best Performing State Corporations

No.State

CorporationParent

MinistryFunctionalCategory

CompositeScore

1. Kenya WineAgenciesLimited

Trade Commercial / Manufacturing

1.5131

2. Nyayo TeaZonesDevelopmentCorporation

Agriculture Commercial/ Manufacturing

1.5229

3. University of Nairobi

HigherEducation,Science andTechnology

PublicUniversities

1.5843



8

4.

KenyaLiteratureBureau

Education Commercial / Manufacturing

1.8594

5. KenyattaUniversity


PublicUniversities

1.9426

6. Kenya PipelineCompanyLimited

Energy Commercial / Manufacturing

1.9796

7. NationalIrrigationBoard

Water andIrrigation

Regulatory 1.9847

8. Jomo KenyattaUniversity of Agriculture andTechnology


PublicUniversities

1.9851

9. Kenya Re-InsuranceCorporation

Finance Financial 2.0009

10. KenyattaInternationalConference

Centre

Tourism Commercial / Manufacturing

2.0121

17. The performance of State Corporations is further presented inaccordance with functional categories in Annex IV.

4.3 Local Authorities

18. A total of 175 Local Authorities that were on Performance Contractswere evaluated and the results are shown in Table 6.

Table 6- Performance of Local Authorities by Grade Performance Number PercentageExcellent 0 0Very Good 21 12Good 128 73.1Fair 5 2.9Poor 21 12Total 175 100



9

19. The details of the performance of all Local Authorities including theircategorization are given in Annexes V and VI respectively. The bestten performing Local Authorities are shown in Table 7.

Table 7 – Best Performing Local Authorities

No. Local Authority Composite Score1. Town Council of Nyamache 2.26012. Municipal Council of Chuka 2.30593. County Council of Masaku 2.3632

4. County Council of Bureti 2.3637

5. Municipal Council of Nakuru 2.3701

6. County Council of Ol-Kejuado 2.3762

7. County Council of Thika 2.3799

8. Municipal Council of Eldoret 2.3949

9. Municipal Council of Nyeri 2.4084

10. County Council of Nyambene 2.4125

4.4 Tertiary Institutions

20. A total of 61 Tertiary Institutions in the Ministry of Education andMinistry of Higher Education, Science and Technology were onPerformance Contracts and were evaluated and the results areshown in Table 8.

Table 8- Performance of Tertiary Institutions by Grade Performance Number PercentageExcellent 0 0Very Good 24 39.3Good 36 59.1Fair 0 0Poor 1 1.6Total 61 100

21. The details of the performance of all Tertiary Institutions on

Performance Contract including their categorization are given inAnnex VII and VIII respectively. The best ten performing TertiaryInstitutions are shown in Table 9.



10

Table 9 – Best Performing Tertiary Institutions

No. Tertiary Institutions CompositeScore

1. Kenya Technical Teachers College 1.86192. Eldoret Polytechnic 1.96613. Mawego Technical Training Institute 2.11754. Sigalagala Technical Training Institute 2.16415. Rift Valley Technical Training Institute 2.16576. Kenya Institute for the Blind 2.1881

7. Thika Technical Training Institute 2.19548. Bumbe Technical Training Institute 2.21779. Igoji Teachers Training College 2.2183

10. Nyeri Technical Training Institute 2.2876



11

CHAPTER FIVE

LESSONS LEARNT22. The lessons learnt during the process of negotiation, evaluation and

moderation were categorized into three broad areas: guidelines and methodology; impact on the ground; and; process of negotiation and evaluation.

5.1 Guidelines and Methodology

23. Under the guidelines and methodology, a number of lessons havebeen learnt.

(a ) There is a visible mismatch between annual work planning of public agencies and performance contracting. Similardiscrepancies are visible between Annual Reports andPerformance Contract reports.

(b) The use of the Automated System enhanced the standardizationof reporting formats and should continue.

(c) A significant number of Agencies appear not to be very familiarwith the Guidelines of evaluation.

5.2 Impact on the Ground

24. With regard to impact on the ground, the following lessons have beenlearnt.

(a ) There has been visible improvement in the overall performanceof institutions and even individual officers, since PerformanceContracts were introduced. Additional capacity building shouldbe directed towards improving qualitative management practicessuch as Monitoring and Evaluation of programmes/projects,reporting of achievement as well as documentation of theevidence of achievement.

(b) The performance ranking and public recognition have beeninstrumental in motivating Public Agencies to pursueachievement of the agreed targets competitively and withcommitment. This has resulted in remarkable improvement inperformance, and positive impact on service delivery.

5.3 Process of Performance Contracts Negotiation and Evaluation

25. The following lessons have been learnt with respect to the processesof negotiation and evaluation.



12

(a ) The continued use of an external team of independentNegotiators, Evaluators and Moderators has ensured anindependent outcome.

(b) Regular monitoring of the implementation of the PerformanceContracts is a vital aspect for its success. Providing feedback onquarterly reports and taking corrective action, where necessary,are key ingredients for the attainment of a performance culture.

(c) Factoring in specific sector performance standards into thePerformance Contracting framework will enhance visibility andachievement of key results.



13

CHAPTER SIX

OBSERVATIONS, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS ANDWAY FORWARD

6.1 Observations

26. The overall performance of Ministries/Departments has improvedwith 68.9 % in the “Very Good” category compared to 33% in thesame category in the FY 2008/2009. Similarly, the performance of State Corporations has improved significantly with 64.8% in the“Very Good” category compared to 45% in the same category inthe FY 2008/2009. It is note worthy that only 32.1% of the StateCorporations are in the “Good” category compared to 51% in thesame category in FY 2008/2009.

For Local Authorities, the number in the “Very Good” category hasdoubled from 6% in FY 2008/2009 to 12% in FY 2009/2010 whilethe number in the “Good” category has reduced from 84% in FY2008/2009 to 73.1% in FY 2009/2010. However, a few LocalAuthorities are still performing poorly such that the number in the“Poor” has increased from 6% in FY 2008/2009 to 12% in FY2009/2010.

For the Tertiary Institutions, the performance continues to improvewith 39.3% in the “Very Good” category up from 35% in FY2008/2009. It is also significant that only 1.6% of the TertiaryInstitutions are in the “Poor” category compared to 6% in the FY2008/2009.

6.2 Conclusions27. It is evident that as a result of introduction of the Performance

Contracts Strategy, there is greater efficiency, accountability, andimproved service delivery.

28. The Performance Contracting Department should monitor theimplementation of the Performance Contracting Strategy on acontinuous basis in order to identify gaps and plan to undertakecapacity development for the Public Agencies as necessary.

6.3 Recommendations

29. Based on the lessons learnt and an overview of the implementationof the Performance Contracts Strategy, the followingrecommendations are made.

(i) To ensure smooth implementation of the PerformanceContracts Strategy, particularly with regard to providingfeedback on quarterly, mid-year and annual reports, there is



14

an urgent need to strengthen the capacity of the PerformanceContracting Department.

(ii) To motivate growth and improvement, an award category forthe three (3) most-improved public agencies should beintroduced and maintained.

(iii) There is a need to institute visible sanctions as deemedappropriate for Public Agencies ranked in the “Poor” grade.

(iv) All Public Agencies should be evaluated not only on theirrecorded improvements, but also on their ability to attain andmaintain internationally recognized Sector PerformanceStandards. This would make it possible to compare theperformance of Public Agencies in Kenya with similaragencies within the region as well as in other developingcountries.

(v) A mid-term review should be undertaken for all PublicAgencies during the contract year in order to assess progresstowards achievement of the annual performance targets.

(vi) To ensure sustainability of the Performance ContractsStrategy as a management tool, it should be legislated andentrenched in the Laws of Kenya.

(vii) Each Public Agency should create and/or strengthen aPerformance Contract unit at a senior level directlyresponsible for the implementation of the Strategy.

(viii) There is a need to review the existing legal and institutionalframeworks that currently govern the operations of PublicAgencies to harmonize them with the requirements of thePerformance Contracts Strategy.

(ix) There is a need to assess the impact of the PerformanceContracting process at the grassroots level.

6.4 Way Forward

30. Performance Contracting should cover all Public Agencies in thethree arms of Government, without exception.

31. With the use of the Automated System of self evaluation andModeration, there is a need to enhance the capacity of members of

the Ad-hoc Task Force involved in the exercise.



15

ANNEXES

I.

Performance Evaluation Guidelines.II. Performance Evaluation Results for Ministries/Departments.

III. Performance Evaluation Results for State Corporations.

IV. Performance Evaluation Results for State Corporations byFunctional Category.

V. Performance Evaluation Results for Local Authorities.

VI. Performance Evaluation Results for Local Authorities byCategory.

VII. Performance Evaluation Results for Tertiary Institutions.

VIII. Performance Evaluation Results for Tertiary Institutions byParent Ministry.





17

There is room for furthering performance on any indicator whoseachievement is assigned a criteria value of 2.49. In this regard,achievement above 100% may be assigned higher criteria value inproportion to the “additional” performance.Very Good - Achievement of the set target in the performance

contract up to 129.99% of the target.

Good - Achievement between 70% and 99.99% of the set targetFair - Achievement between 50% and 69.99% of the targetPoor - Achievement between 0% and 49.99% of the target2. Operating Rules

Rule 1 Performance cannot rise above criteria value of 1.

Achievement of >200% of the target therefore attracts a rawscore of 1. It is accordingly not necessary to engage infurther calculation of raw score when achievement is>200% of the target.

Rule 2 Performance cannot fall below criteria value of 5.

Achievement of <0 therefore attracts a raw score of 5. It istherefore not necessary to engage in further calculation of the raw score when achievement is zero or negative.

3. Basic Requirements

1. Strategic plan2. 4th Quarter/Annual performance reports in standard formats3. Guidelines for evaluating performance contracts

4.

Approved budget5. Copies of: Vetted Performance Contract; Letter of Vetting Other supporting documents as need arise.

4. Computation of the Raw Score

Computation of the Raw Score entails determining the proportion of the span (as indicated above) which will go into the achievement units(or values) in order to determine wherein within the range, theachievement falls. It therefore presumes the criteria value range inwhich the specified achievement level falls is already known.

The Methodology for calculating raw score is dependent oncriteria value range in which achievement falls. It is more likemeasuring the distance which performance has “traveled” insidethe span of respective range. It is therefore not the same fordifferent criteria value ranges.



18

Step 1: Determine the criteria value range where the actualperformance falls, as follows:

The determination of the criteria value range for “Excellent”, “VeryGood”, “Good”, “Fair” and “Poor” would be as follows:

(i) Excellent = 1.3 T ≤ Xa ≤ 2T

(ii) Very Good = T ≤ Xa <1.3T

(iii) Good = 0.7T ≤ Xa < T

(iv) Fair = 0.5T ≤ Xa < 0.7T

(v) Poor = 0 ≤ Xa < 0.5T

EXCELLENT V. GOOD GOOD FAIR POOR

2T 1.3T T 0.7T 0.5T 0

1.00 1.49 2.49 3.50 3.60 5

Step 2: Calculate Raw Score using the following formulae

The following units XU, XL will be used with the indicated meanings:

XU = value corresponding to upper criteria value range;

XL = value corresponding to lower criteria value range.

For example in the case of “excellent” performance, XU = 2T

XL = 1.3T

XU and XL will differ for different performance ranges depending onwhere Xa falls.

The following formulae will be used to calculate the Raw Score:





20

ANNEX II

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS FORMINISTRIES/DEPARTMENTS

No. Ministry/Department CompositeScore

EXCELLENTNone

VERY GOOD1. Ministry of Planning, National Development

and Vision 20302.1010

2. Ministry of Gender, Children and Social

Development

2.1096

3. Cabinet Office 2.11214. Ministry of Energy 2.11455. Public Service Commission 2.13386. Ministry of Water and Irrigation 2.17567. Ministry of Public Works 2.1889

8. Ministry of State for Public Service 2.19909. Ministry of Lands 2.213210. Ministry of Agriculture 2.219211. State House 2.247412. Ministry of Livestock Development 2.2481

13. Ministry of Information and Communications 2.273214. Ministry of Environment and Mineral

Resources2.2739

15. Ministry of State for Development of Northern Kenya and Other Arid Lands

2.2924

16. State Law Office 2.311617. Ministry of Trade 2.318118. Ministry of State for Provincial

Administration and Internal Security2.3379

19. Ministry of Industrialization 2.352320. Ministry of Justice, National Cohesion and

Constitutional Affairs2.3541

21. Ministry of State for National Heritage andCulture

2.3816

22. Ministry of Housing 2.3860



21

No. Ministry/Department CompositeScore

23. Ministry of Roads 2.3861

24. Ministry of Medical Services 2.401325. Performance Contracting Department 2.408426. Ministry of State for Immigration and

Registration of Persons2.4145

27. Ministry of Regional DevelopmentAuthorities

2.4315

28. Ministry of Higher Education, Science andTechnology

2.4322

29. Office of the Vice President and Ministry of Home Affairs

2.4596

30. Ministry of Co-operative Development andMarketing

2.4686

31. Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation 2.4902GOOD

32. Ministry of Labour 2.524933. Office of the Prime Minister 2.530234. Ministry of Tourism 2.547335. Ministry of Fisheries Development 2.547336. Ministry of State for Special Programmes 2.561537. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and

Ministry of Finance2.5905

38. Ministry of Education 2.612139. Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2.658140. Ministry of Nairobi Metropolitan

Development2.6834

41. Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife 2.6846

42. Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports 2.693843. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and

Ministry of Local Government2.7132

44. Ministry of East African Community 2.847845. Ministry of Transport 2.8619

FAIR

None POORNone



22

ANNEX III

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS FORSTATE CORPORATIONS

No. STATECORPORATION

PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

EXCELLENTNone

VERY GOOD1. Kenya Wine

Agencies Ltd.Trade Commercial/

Manufacturing1.5131

2. Nyayo Tea ZonesDevelopmentCorporation


1.5229

3. University of Nairobi


PublicUniversities

1.5843

4. Kenya LiteratureBureau

Education Commercial/ Manufacturing

1.8594



PublicUniversities

1.9426

6. Kenya PipelineCompany Ltd.

Energy Commercial/ Manufacturing

1.9796

7. National IrrigationBoard

Water andIrrigation

Regulatory 1.9847



PublicUniversities

1.9851



10. KenyattaInternationalConference Centre

Tourism Commercial/ Manufacturing

2.0121

11. Kenya EducationStaff Institute

Education TertiaryEducation andTraining

2.0351

12. Moi University HigherEducation,Science andTechnology

PublicUniversities

2.0482

13. Kenya WaterInstitute

Water andIrrigation

TertiaryEducation

2.0602



23


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

14. Postal Corporationof Kenya

Information andCommunication

Commercial/ Manufacturing

2.0624

15. Coffee ResearchFoundation

Agriculture Training andResearch

2.0658

16. Kenya NationalLibrary Services

Gender, Childrenand SocialDevelopment

Service 2.0892

17. Lake VictoriaNorth WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.0982

18. NationalCommission onGender andDevelopment


Service 2.1035

19. Kenya Power andLighting CompanyLimited


2.1044

20. Egerton University HigherEducation,Science andTechnology

PublicUniversities

2.1143

21. Athi WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.1372

22. Kenya ForestService

Forestry andWildlife

Service 2.1434

23. Kenya AirportsAuthority

Transport Commercial/ Manufacturing

2.1446

24. Water ServicesTrust Fund

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.1487

25. Nzoia SugarCompany


2.1601

26. InsuranceRegulatoryAuthority

Finance Regulatory 2.1608

27. National WaterConservation andPipelineCorporation

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.1638

28. Ewaso Ng’iroNorth DevelopmentAuthority

RegionalDevelopmentAuthorities

RegionalDevelopment

2.1641

29. Kenya Institute of Education

Education Service 2.1692

30. Kimathi UniversityCollege


Higher Education 2.1724



24


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

31. CommunicationsCommission of Kenya

Information andCommunications

Regulatory 2.1726

32. Pwani UniversityCollege



33. South NyanzaSugar Company


2.1891

34. HigherEducation Loans

Board


35. Kenya Dairy Board Livestock Development

Regulatory 2.1921

36. RuralElectrificationAuthority

Energy Service 2.1942

37. Tea ResearchFoundation of Kenya


2.1978

38. National Museumsof Kenya

Home Affairs Training andResearch

2.2062

39. Consolidated Bank of Kenya


40. Kenya RevenueAuthority


41. Kenya ICT Board Information andCommunication

2.2247

42. Kisii University

College

Higher

Education,Science andTechnology


43. Kenya ElectricityGeneratingCompany Ltd.


2.2411

44. Kenya TouristBoard

Tourism Service 2.2447

45. Kenya Institute of Administration

Public Service Training andResearch

2.2525

46. ConstituencyDevelopment Fund

Planning,NationalDevelopment &Vision 2030

Service 2.2540

47. Kenya CoconutDevelopmentAuthority

Agriculture Regulatory 2.2587

48. Kenya RailwaysCorporation


2.2592



25


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

49. Kenya MaritimeAuthority

Transport Regulatory 2.2642

50. PrivatizationCommission of Kenya

Finance Service 2.2643

51. Moi Teaching andReferral Hospital

Health Service 2.2666

52. Co-operativeCollege of Kenya

CooperativeDevelopment andMarketing

TertiaryEducation

2.2733

53. Tana WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.2781

54. Catering and

Tourism TrainingDevelopment LevyTrustees

Tourism Regulatory 2.2844

55. Export PromotionCouncil

Trade Regulatory 2.2923

56. Kenya Roads Board Roads Financial 2.302957. Kenya Sugar

BoardAgriculture Regulatory 2.3065

58. Kenya Bureau of Standards

Industrialization Regulatory 2.3235

59. Maseno University HigherEducation,Science andTechnology

PublicUniversities

2.3270

60. Kenya SugarResearchFoundation


2.3299

61. NationalCoordinatingAgency forPopulation andDevelopment

Planning,NationalDevelopment andVision 2030

Service 2.3342

62. Kenya Post OfficeSavings Bank


63. Kenya NationalExaminations

Council


64. Masinde MuliroUniversity of Science andTechnology


PublicUniversities

2.3409



26


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

65. Kenya NationalBureau of Statistics

Ministry of Planning,NationalDevelopment &Vision 2030

Service 2.3417

66. Kenya MedicalResearch Institute

Health Training andResearch

2.3522

67. NGO CoordinationBoard

Home Affairs Regulatory 2.3571

68. Northern WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.3579

69. National CampaignAgainst DrugAbuse Authority

ProvincialAdministrationand InternalSecurity

Service 2.3638

70. Kenya MedicalSupplies Agency


71. South EasternUniversity College



72. Kenya Accountantsand SecretariesNationalExaminationsBoard


73. MombasaPolytechnicUniversity College



74. Capital MarketsAuthority

Finance 2.3762

75. Water ResourcesManagementAuthority

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.3798

76. Retirement BenefitsAuthority


77. Commission forHigher Education


Regulatory 2.3908

78. Council of legalEducation

Justice, NationalCohesion &ConstitutionalAffairs

Regulatory 2.3929

79. Kenya ForestryResearch Institute


Training andResearch

2.3933



27


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

80. Kenya TouristDevelopmentCorporation

Tourism Financial 2.3947

81. Rift Valley WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.4015

82. Water ServicesRegulatory Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.4031

83. Lake VictoriaSouth WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.4032

84. National Councilfor Persons withDisabilities

Home Affairs Service 2.4185

85. Kenya Urban

Roads Authority

Roads Financial 2.4199

86. Bondo UniversityCollege

Ministry of HigherEducation,Science andTechnology


87. Meru UniversityCollege of Scienceand Technology


HigherEducation,

2.4253

88. Kenya NationalTradingCorporation

Trade Financial 2.4266

89. Teachers Service

Commission


90. Kenya Marine andFisheries ResearchInstitute

FisheriesDevelopment


2.4318

91. Kenya OrdinanceFactoriesCorporation

Defence Service 2.4318

92. NationalEnvironmentalManagementAuthority

Environment andMineralResources

Regulatory 2.4340

93. Kenya CopyrightBoard

State Law Office Regulatory 2.4414

94. Kenya AgriculturalResearch Institute


2.4551

95. Kenya PolytechnicUniversity College





28


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

96. Tana and AthiRiversDevelopmentAuthority


RegionalDevelopment

2.4626

97. Kenya Institute forPublic PolicyResearch andAnalysis



2.4763

98. Kenya ElectricityTransmissionCompany


2.4771

99. Kenya IndustrialResearch andDevelopment

Institute

Industrialization Training andResearch

2.4784

100. AgriculturalDevelopmentCorporation

Agriculture Service 2.4834

101. Tea Board of Kenya


102. Horticultural CropsDevelopmentAuthority


103. National HospitalInsurance Fund

Health Financial 2.4922

104. Kenya CivilAviation Authority


105. Ewaso Ng’iro

South DevelopmentAuthority

Regional

DevelopmentAuthorities

Regional

Development

2.4999

GOOD 106. Public Procurement

OversightAuthority


107. Kenya PortsAuthority


2.5271

108. Kenya Plant HealthInspectorateServices


109. National AidsControl Council

SpecialProgrammes

Service 2.5308

110. Kenya FilmCommission


Regulatory 2.5521

111. Local AuthoritiesProvident Fund

LocalGovernment

Service 2.5579

112. Energy RegulatoryCommission

Energy Regulatory 2.5594



29


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

113. Coast DevelopmentAuthority


RegionalDevelopment

2.5612

114. Lake BasinDevelopmentAuthority


RegionalDevelopment

2.5698

115. National SocialSecurity Fund

Labour Financial 2.5777

116. Kenya SafariLodges and Hotels


2.5911

117. Pest ControlProducts Board


118. Youth EnterpriseDevelopment Fund

Youth Affairsand Sports

Service 2.6183

119. Bomas of Kenya Tourism Service 2.6337120. Kenya Ferry

Services Ltd.Transport Service 2.6346

121. National Cerealsand Produce Board


2.6392

122. National Councilfor ChildrenServices


123. Narok UniversityCollege


TertiaryEducation

2.6569

124. Kenya Institute of Special Education


125. IndustrialDevelopment Bank


126. Kenya MedicalTraining College

Health TertiaryEducation

2.6724

127. Kenya WildlifeService


128. Tanathi WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.6778

129. Sports StadiaManagement Board


Service 2.6783

130. Kenya IndustrialProperty Institute

Industrialization Service 2.6811

131. Kenya SeedCompany Ltd.


2.6877

132. Export ProcessingZones Authority




30


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

133. Kerio ValleyDevelopmentAuthority


RegionalDevelopment

2.7107

134. Chuka UniversityCollege



135. Brand Kenya Board Tourism Service 2.7253136. Kenyatta National

HospitalHealth Service 2.7518

137. KabiangaUniversity College

HigherEducation,Science and

Technology


138. KenyaBroadcastingCorporation



2.7736

139. Industrial andCommercialDevelopmentCorporation


140. Coffee Board of Kenya


141. Kenya NationalHighwaysAuthority

Roads Service 2.8199

142. Kenya Utalii

College

Tourism Tertiary

Education

2.8234

143. Kenya Rural RoadsAuthority


144. Kenya IndustrialEstates

Industrialization Financial 2.9010

145. National HousingCorporation

Housing Commercial/ Manufacturing

2.9503

146. Multi-MediaUniversity Collegeof Kenya



147. BukuraAgriculturalCollege

Agriculture TertiaryEducation

3.0917

148. Pyrethrum Board of Kenya


3.1682

149. Kenya NationalShipping Line

Transport Financial 3.1909

150. National Oil Energy Commercial/ 3.1991



31


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

Corporation of Kenya

Manufacturing

151. NumericalMachiningComplex

Industrialization Commercial/ Manufacturing

3.2002

152. Agro Chemical andFood CompanyLtd.


3.2219

153. Coast WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 3.2314

154. CoffeeDevelopment Fund


155. New KenyaCooperative

Creameries Ltd.

CooperativeDevelopment and

Marketing


3.3303

156. CottonDevelopmentAuthority


157. Jomo KenyattaFoundation


3.4791

FAIR158. Kenya Meat

CommissionLivestock Development


3.5974

POOR159. Agricultural

FinanceCorporation

Agriculture Financial 3.6455

160. East AfricanPortland CementCompany Ltd.


3.6830

161. Chemelil SugarCompany


3.9958

162. School EquipmentProduction Unit


4.4609



32

ANNEX IV

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS FORSTATE CORPORATIONS BY FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY

1. FinancialNo. STATE

CORPORATIONPARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE



2. Consolidated Bank of Kenya


3. Kenya RevenueAuthority


4. Kenya RoadsBoard


5. Kenya Post OfficeSavings Bank


6. Kenya TouristDevelopmentCorporation

Tourism Financial 2.3947

7. Kenya UrbanRoads Authority


8. Kenya NationalTradingCorporation


9. National HospitalInsurance Fund

Health Financial 2.4922

10.

National SocialSecurity Fund Labour Financial 2.5777

11. IndustrialDevelopment Bank


12. Industrial andCommercialDevelopmentCorporation


13. Kenya Rural RoadsAuthority


14. Kenya IndustrialEstates

Industrialization Financial 2.9010

15. Kenya NationalShipping Line

Transport Financial 3.1909

16. AgriculturalFinanceCorporation

Agriculture Financial 3.6455



33

2. Commercial/Manufacturing


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

1. Kenya WineAgencies Ltd.

Trade Commercial/ Manufacturing

1.5131

2. Nyayo Tea ZonesDevelopmentCorporation


1.5229

3. Kenya LiteratureBureau


1.8594

4. Kenya PipelineCompany Ltd.


1.9796

5. KenyattaInternationalConference Centre


2.0121

6. Postal Corporationof Kenya

Information andCommunication


2.0624

7. Kenya Power andLighting CompanyLimited


2.1044

8. Kenya AirportsAuthority


2.1446

9. Nzoia SugarCompany


2.1601

10. South NyanzaSugar Company


2.1891

11. Kenya ElectricityGeneratingCompany Ltd.


2.2411

12. Kenya RailwaysCorporation


2.2592

13. Kenya ElectricityTransmissionCompany


2.4771

14. Kenya PortsAuthority


2.5271

15. Kenya SafariLodges and Hotels


2.5911

16. National Cerealsand Produce Board


2.6392

17. Kenya SeedCompany Ltd.


2.6877

18.

KenyaBroadcastingCorporation


Commercial/ Manufacturing 2.7736

19. National HousingCorporation

Housing Commercial/ Manufacturing

2.9503



34


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

20. Pyrethrum Boardof Kenya


3.1682

21. National OilCorporation of Kenya


3.1991

22. NumericalMachiningComplex


3.2002

23. Agro Chemical andFood CompanyLtd.


3.2219

24. New KenyaCooperativeCreameries Ltd.

CooperativeDevelopmentand Marketing


3.3303

25. Jomo KenyattaFoundation


3.4791

26. Kenya MeatCommission

Livestock Development


3.5974

27. East AfricanPortland CementCompany Ltd.


3.6830

28. Chemelil SugarCompany


3.9958

29. School EquipmentProduction Unit


4.4609

3. Regulatory


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

EXCELLENTNone

VERY GOOD1. National Irrigation

BoardWater andIrrigation

Regulatory 1.9847

2. InsuranceRegulatoryAuthority


3. CommunicationsCommission of Kenya


Regulatory 2.1726

4. Kenya Dairy Board Livestock Development

Regulatory 2.1921

5. Kenya CoconutDevelopmentAuthority




35


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

6. Kenya MaritimeAuthority


7. Catering andTourism TrainingDevelopment LevyTrustees

Tourism Regulatory 2.2844

8. Export PromotionCouncil


9. Kenya SugarBoard


10. Kenya Bureau of Standards

Industrialization Regulatory 2.3235

11.

NGO CoordinationBoard Home Affairs Regulatory 2.3571

12. Capital MarketsAuthority


13. RetirementBenefits Authority


14. Commission forHigher Education


Regulatory 2.3908

15. Council of legalEducation

Justice, NationalCohesion &ConstitutionalAffairs

Regulatory 2.3929

16. NationalEnvironmentalManagementAuthority

Environment andMineralResources

Regulatory 2.4340

17. Kenya CopyrightBoard

State Law Office Regulatory 2.4414

18. Tea Board of Kenya


19. Horticultural CropsDevelopmentAuthority


20. Kenya CivilAviation Authority


GOOD21. Public Procurement

OversightAuthority




36


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

22. Kenya Plant HealthInspectorateServices


23. Kenya FilmCommission


Regulatory 2.5521

24. Energy RegulatoryCommission

Energy Regulatory 2.5594

25. Pest ControlProducts Board


26. Export ProcessingZones Authority


27. Coffee Board of Kenya


28. CoffeeDevelopment Fund


29. CottonDevelopmentAuthority


FAIRNone

POORNone

4. Public Universities


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

1. University of

Nairobi

Higher

Education,Science andTechnology

Public

Universities

1.5843



PublicUniversities

1.9426



PublicUniversities

1.9851

4. Moi University HigherEducation,Science andTechnology

PublicUniversities

2.0482

5. Egerton University HigherEducation,Science andTechnology

PublicUniversities

2.1143



37


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

6. Maseno University HigherEducation,Science andTechnology

PublicUniversities

2.3270

7. Masinde MuliroUniversity of Science andTechnology


PublicUniversities

2.3409

5. Higher Education


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

1. Pwani UniversityCollege



2. South EasternUniversity College



3. Bondo UniversityCollege



4. Kenya PolytechnicUniversity College

HigherEducation,

Science andTechnology


5. Chuka UniversityCollege



6. Kimathi UniversityCollege



7. Kisii UniversityCollege

HigherEducation,Science and

Technology


8. MombasaPolytechnicUniversity College





38

6. Training and Research


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

9. Kabianga UniversityCollege



10. Multi-MediaUniversity College of Kenya



11. Meru UniversityCollege of Scienceand Technology


Higher Education, 2.4253


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

1. Coffee ResearchFoundation


2.0658

2. Tea ResearchFoundation of Kenya


2.1978

3. National Museumsof Kenya

Home Affairs Training andResearch

2.2062

4. Kenya Institute of Administration

Public Service Training andResearch

2.2525

5. Kenya SugarResearchFoundation


2.3299

6. Kenya MedicalResearch Institute

Health Training andResearch

2.3522

7. Kenya ForestryResearch Institute



2.3933

8. Kenya Marine andFisheries ResearchInstitute

FisheriesDevelopment


2.4318

9. Kenya AgriculturalResearch Institute


2.4551

10. Kenya Institute forPublic PolicyResearch andAnalysis

Planning,NationalDevelopmentand Vision2030


2.4763

11. Kenya IndustrialResearch andDevelopmentInstitute

Industrialization


2.4784



39

7. Service


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

EXCELLENTNone

VERY GOOD1. Kenya National

Library ServicesGender, Childrenand SocialDevelopment

Service 2.0892

2. Lake VictoriaNorth WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.0982

3. NationalCommission onGender andDevelopment


Service 2.1035

4. Athi WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.1372

5. Kenya ForestService


Service 2.1434

6. Water ServicesTrust Fund

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.1487

7. National WaterConservation andPipelineCorporation

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.1638

8. Kenya Institute of Education


9.

HigherEducation LoansBoard


10. RuralElectrificationAuthority

Energy Service 2.1942

11. Kenya ICT Board Information andCommunication

Service 2.2247

12. Kenya TouristBoard


13. ConstituencyDevelopment Fund

Planning,NationalDevelopment &Vision 2030

Service 2.2540

14. PrivatizationCommission of Kenya


15. Moi Teaching andReferral Hospital




40


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

16. Tana WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.2781

17. NationalCoordinatingAgency forPopulation andDevelopment


Service 2.3342

18. Kenya NationalExaminationsCouncil


19. Kenya NationalBureau of Statistics

Ministry of Planning,

NationalDevelopment &Vision 2030

Service 2.3417

20. Northern WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.3579

21. National CampaignAgainst DrugAbuse Authority

ProvincialAdministrationand InternalSecurity

Service 2.3638

22. Kenya MedicalSupplies Agency


23. Kenya Accountantsand SecretariesNationalExaminationsBoard


24. Water ResourcesManagementAuthority

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.3798

25. Rift Valley WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.4015

26. Water ServicesRegulatory Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.4031

27. Lake VictoriaSouth WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.4032

28. National Councilfor Persons withDisabilities


29.

Teachers ServiceCommission Education Service 2.4299

30. Kenya OrdinanceFactoriesCorporation

Defence Service 2.4318



41


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

31. AgriculturalDevelopmentCorporation

Agriculture Service 2.4834

GOOD32. National Aids

Control CouncilSpecialProgrammes

Service 2.5308

33. Local AuthoritiesProvident Fund

LocalGovernment

Service 2.5579

34. Youth EnterpriseDevelopment Fund


Service 2.6183

35. Bomas of Kenya Tourism Service 2.633736. Kenya Ferry

Services Ltd.

Transport Service 2.6346

37. National Councilfor ChildrenServices


38. Kenya Institute of Special Education


39. Kenya WildlifeService


40. Tanathi WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 2.6778

41. Sports StadiaManagement Board


Service 2.6783

42. Kenya IndustrialProperty Institute

Industrialization Service 2.6811

43. Brand Kenya Board Tourism Service 2.725344. Kenyatta National

HospitalHealth Service 2.7518

45. Kenya NationalHighwaysAuthority

Roads Service 2.8199

46. Coast WaterServices Board

Water andIrrigation

Service 3.2314

FAIRNone

POORNone



42

8. Regional Development Authorities

9. Tertiary Education

NO. STATECORPORATION

PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

1. Kenya EducationStaff Institute

Education Tertiary Educationand Training

2.0351

2. Kenya WaterInstitute Water andIrrigation Tertiary Education 2.0602

3. Co-operativeCollege of Kenya

CooperativeDevelopmentand Marketing

Tertiary Education 2.2733

4. Narok UniversityCollege


Tertiary Education 2.6569

5. Kenya MedicalTraining College

Health Tertiary Education 2.6724

6. Kenya UtaliiCollege

Tourism Tertiary Education 2.8234

7. Bukura

AgriculturalCollege

Agriculture Tertiary Education 3.0917


PARENTMINISTRY

FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

COMPOSITESCORE

1. Ewaso Ng’iroNorth DevelopmentAuthority


RegionalDevelopment

2.1641

2. Tana and AthiRiversDevelopmentAuthority


RegionalDevelopment

2.4626

3. Ewaso Ng’iroSouth DevelopmentAuthority


RegionalDevelopment

2.4999

4. Coast Development

Authority

Regional

DevelopmentAuthorities

Regional

Development

2.5612

5. Lake BasinDevelopmentAuthority


RegionalDevelopment

2.5698

6. Kerio ValleyDevelopmentAuthority


RegionalDevelopment

2.7107



43

ANNEX V

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS FOR LOCALAUTHORITIESNo. LOCAL AUTHORITY COMPOSITE SCORE

EXCELLENT

None

VERY GOOD

1. Town Council of Nyamache 2.2601

2. Municipal Council of Chuka 2.30593. County Council of Masaku 2.3632

4. County Council of Bureti 2.36375. Municipal Council of Nakuru 2.3701

6. County Council of Ol- Kejuado 2.3762



9. Municipal Council of Nyeri 2.4084

10. County Council of Nyambene 2.412511. Town Council of Rongo 2.4266

12. Town Council of Molo 2.4290

13. Town Council of Ugunja 2.4310

14. City Council of Nairobi 2.4428

15. County Council of Moyale 2.448416. County Council of Kipsigis 2.4528

17. County Council of Kirinyaga 2.458018. County Council of Kakamega 2.4608

19. Town Council of Kilifi 2.4613

20. County Council of Nyeri 2.483421. County Council of Kilifi 2.4934

GOOD

22. Town Council of Malava 2.5028

23. Municipal Council of Murang'a 2.519624. County Council of Vihiga 2.5217

25. Municipal Council of Kakamega 2.5242



44

No. LOCAL AUTHORITY COMPOSITE SCORE

26. County Council of Migori 2.527827. County Council of Kiambu 2.5313

28. County Council of Kitui 2.5339

29. Municipal Council of Meru 2.548030. County Council of Koibatek 2.5496

31. Municipal Council of Vihiga 2.5862

32. Municipal Council of Homa Bay 2.6021

33. County Council of Nyando 2.6055

34. Town Council of Chogoria 2.612935. County Council of Keiyo 2.6156

36. County Council of Mwingi 2.625837. Town Council of Kikuyu 2.6314

38. County Council of Tharaka 2.634539. Town Council of Ukwala 2.6356

40. County Council of Murang'a 2.636141. Municipal Council of Mavoko 2.6399

42. Municipal Council of Migori 2.6525

43. County Council of Kisumu 2.6559

44. Municipal Council of Mombasa 2.6564

45. Town Council of Luanda 2.6598

46. County Council of Taita Taveta 2.661847. Town Council of Mbita Point 2.6667

48. Municipal Council of Mumias 2.6810

49. County Council of Bomet 2.6886

50. Municipal Council of Ruiru 2.6899

51. Town Council of Kangema 2.690952. Town Council of Sirisia 2.6933

53. Municipal Council of Kiambu 2.7010

54. Municipal Council of Thika 2.7019

55. Town Council of Malaba 2.7061

56. Municipal Council of Bungoma 2.7201

57. County Council of Isiolo 2.7361



45


58. Town Council of Yala 2.7382

59. Municipal Council of Embu 2.745360. Municipal Council of Bomet 2.7577

61. Town Council of Muhoroni 2.7610

62. Town Council of Ol-kalou 2.761763. Town Council of Makuyu 2.767364. Town Council of Nandi-Hills 2.7723

65. County Council of Makueni 2.7773

66. County Council of Gucha 2.7799

67. County Council of Nandi 2.7871

68. Municipal Council of Limuru 2.7881

69. Municipal Council of Machakos 2.7898

70. Town Council of Ogembo 2.7926

71. County Council of Nzoia 2.7941

72. County Council of Butere -Mumias 2.7949

73. County Council of Embu 2.812374. Municipal Council of Kisumu 2.8297

75. Municipal Council of Kericho 2.8354

76. Municipal Council of Malindi 2.8371

77. County Council of Suba 2.843578. Municipal Council of Kabarnet 2.8529

79. Municipal Council of Nyahururu 2.8536

80. Municipal Council of Voi 2.860681. Town Council of Karuri 2.8705

82. Town Council of Awendo 2.8748

83. County Council of Bungoma 2.8812

84. County Council of Bondo 2.8844

85. County Council of Wareng 2.8898

86.

Town Council of Narok 2.894387. Town Council of Malakisi 2.9145

88. Municipal Council of Webuye 2.9176



46


89. Municipal Council of Kapsabet 2.928690. County Council of Nakuru 2.9308

91. County Council of Nyandarua 2.933692. County Council of Nyamira 2.9350

93. Municipal Council of Kitui 2.941394. County Council of Gusii 2.9455

95. Municipal Council of Busia 2.9612

96. Municipal Council of Maua 2.980297. County Council of Pokot 2.9820

98. County Council of Baringo 2.987799. Municipal Council of Garissa 2.9968

100. Municipal Council of Lodwar 3.0024

101. Town Council of Kwale 3.0114102. County Council of Turkana 3.0319

103. County Council of Rachuonyo 3.0354

104. Town Council of Eldama Ravine 3.0381

105. Town Council of Othaya 3.0404106. Town Council of Keroka 3.0534

107. Town Council of Maragua 3.0549

108. Municipal Council of Kisii 3.0714109. Municipal Council of Siaya 3.0776

110. Town Council of Bondo 3.0864

111. County Council of Malindi 3.0867112. Town Council of Kipkelion 3.0887

113. County Council of Narok 3.1069

114. Town Council of Kandara 3.1189115. Town Council of Burnt Forest 3.1207

116. County Council of Lugari 3.1235

117. Town Council of Wote 3.1281

118. County Council of Marakwet 3.1291

119. Town Council of Maralal 3.1360

120. Town Council of Rumuruti 3.1443



47


121. County Council of Marsabit 3.1466122. Town Council of Funyula 3.1770

123. Town Council of Kangundo 3.1804124. County Council of Transmara 3.1882

125. County Council of Tana River 3.2001

126. County Council of Mbeere 3.2140127. County Council of Laikipia 3.2165

128. Municipal Council of Kehancha 3.2279

129. County Council of Samburu 3.2783

130. County Council of Meru South 3.2898131. Town Council of Chepareria 3.3075

132. County Council of Mandera 3.3120

133. Municipal Council of Kimilili 3.3269

134. Municipal Council of Naivasha 3.3308

135. Town Council of Oyugis 3.3351

136. Town Council of Masimba 3.3405

137. Town Council of Mwingi 3.3427138. Town Council of Iten-Tambach 3.3897

139. Municipal Council of Runyenjes 3.3906140. Town Council of Ahero 3.4138

141. Municipal Council of Kapenguria 3.4186

142. Town Council of Mandera 3.4203

143. County Council of Mt. Elgon 3.4326

144. Town Council of Nyamira 3.4532

145. Town Council of Matuu 3.4681

146. Town Council of Mariakani 3.4722147. Municipal Council of Karatina 3.4800148. Town Council of Sagana 3.4971

149. Municipal Council of Kerugoya-Kutus 3.4985FAIR

150. County Council of Busia 3.5167



48


151. Town Council of Nambale 3.5403

152. County Council of Kwale 3.5489

153. County Council of Meru Central 3.5766154. Town Council of Suneka 3.5849

POOR

155. Municipal Council of Kitale 3.6636

156. County Council of Garissa 3.6682

157. Municipal Council of Nanyuki 3.6951

158. County Council of Lamu 3.6985159. County Council of Wajir 3.7017

160. County Council of Maragua 3.7128161. Town Council of Nyansiongo 3.7525

162. County Council of Teso 3.7634

163. County Council of Ijara 3.8489

164. Town Council of Sotik 3.8526

165. Town Council of Port Victoria 3.9370

166. Town Council of Kendu Bay 4.0462

167. County Council of Homa Bay 4.0506

168. Town Council of Londiani 4.0563

169. Town Council of Taveta 4.0590170. Town Council of Nyamarambe 4.1089

171. County Council of Siaya 4.1281

172. Town Council of Kajiado 4.3484

173. Town Council of Litein 4.3672

174. Town Council of Mtito Andei 4.5726175. Town Council of Tabaka 4.6748



49

ANNEX VI

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS FOR LOCALAUTHORITIES BY CATEGORY1. City/Municipal Councils


EXCELLENT

NoneVERY GOOD

1. Municipal Council of Chuka 2.30592. Municipal Council of Nakuru 2.3701


4. Municipal Council of Nyeri 2.40845. City Council of Nairobi 2.4428

GOOD

6. Municipal Council of Murang'a 2.51967. Municipal Council of Kakamega 2.5242

8. Municipal Council of Meru 2.54809. Municipal Council of Vihiga 2.5862

10. Municipal Council of Homabay 2.6021

11. Municipal Council of Mavoko 2.6399

12. Municipal Council of Migori 2.6525

13. Municipal Council of Mombasa 2.656414. Municipal Council of Mumias 2.6810

15. Municipal Council of Ruiru 2.6899

16. Municipal Council of Kiambu 2.7010

17. Municipal Council of Thika 2.7019

18. Municipal Council of Bungoma 2.7201

19. Municipal Council of Embu 2.745320. Municipal Council of Bomet 2.7577

21. Municipal Council of Limuru 2.7881

22. Municipal Council of Machakos 2.7898

23. Municipal Council of Kisumu 2.8297

24. Municipal Council of Kericho 2.8354



50


25. Municipal Council of Malindi 2.837126. Municipal Council of Kabarnet 2.8529

27. Municipal Council of Nyahururu 2.8536

28. Municipal Council of Voi 2.860629. Municipal Council of Webuye 2.9176

30. Municipal Council of Kapsabet 2.9286

31. Municipal Council of Kitui 2.941332. Municipal Council of Busia 2.9612

33. Municipal Council of Maua 2.980234. Municipal Council of Garissa 2.9968

35. Municipal Council of Lodwar 3.0024

36. Municipal Council of Kisii 3.0714

37. Municipal Council of Siaya 3.0776

38. Municipal Council of Kehancha 3.2279

39. Municipal Council of Kimilili 3.3269

40. Municipal Council of Naivasha 3.3308

41. Municipal Council of Runyenjes 3.390642. Municipal Council of Kapenguria 3.4186

43. Municipal Council of Karatina 3.4800

44. Municipal Council of Kerugoya-Kutus 3.4985FAIR

None

POOR

45. Municipal Council of Kitale 3.6636

46. Municipal Council of Nanyuki 3.6951



51

2. County Councils


EXCELLENT

None

VERY GOOD

1. County Council of Masaku 2.3632

2. County Council of Bureti 2.3637

3. County Council of Ol- Kejuado 2.3762


5. County Council of Nyambene 2.4125

6.

County Council of Moyale 2.44847. County Council of Kipsigis 2.4528

8. County Council of Kirinyaga 2.45809. County Council of Kakamega 2.4608

10. County Council of Nyeri 2.483411. County Council of Kilifi 2.4934

GOOD

12. County Council of Vihiga 2.5217

13. County Council of Migori 2.5278

14. County Council of Kiambu 2.5313

15. County Council of Kitui 2.533916. County Council of Koibatek 2.5496

17. County Council of Nyando 2.6055

18. County Council of Keiyo 2.6156

19. County Council of Mwingi 2.6258

20. County Council of Tharaka 2.634521. County Council of Murang'a 2.636122. County Council of Kisumu 2.6559

23. County Council of Taita Taveta 2.661824. County Council of Bomet 2.6886

25. County Council of Isiolo 2.736126. County Council of Makueni 2.7773

27. County Council of Gucha 2.7799



52


28. County Council of Nandi 2.787129. County Council of Nzoia 2.7941

30. County Council of Butere -Mumias 2.7949

31. County Council of Embu 2.812332. County Council of Suba 2.8435

33. County Council of Bungoma 2.8812

34. County Council of Bondo 2.8844

35. County Council of Wareng 2.8898

36. County Council of Nakuru 2.9308

37. County Council of Nyandarua 2.933638. County Council of Nyamira 2.9350

39. County Council of Gusii 2.9455

40. County Council of Pokot 2.9820

41. County Council of Baringo 2.987742. County Council of Turkana 3.0319

43. County Council of Rachuonyo 3.0354

44. County Council of Malindi 3.086745. County Council of Narok 3.1069

46. County Council of Lugari 3.1235

47. County Council of Marakwet 3.1291

48. County Council of Marsabit 3.146649. County Council of Transmara 3.1882

50. County Council of Tana River 3.2001

51. County Council of Mbeere 3.214052. County Council of Laikipia 3.2165

53. County Council of Samburu 3.2783

54. County Council of Meru South 3.289855. County Council of Mandera 3.3120

56. County Council of Mt. Elgon 3.4326FAIR

57. County Council of Busia 3.5167



53


58. County Council of Kwale 3.5489

59. County Council of Meru Central 3.5766POOR

60. County Council of Garissa 3.6682

61. County Council of Lamu 3.698562. County Council of Wajir 3.7017

63. County Council of Maragua 3.712864. County Council of Teso 3.7634

65. County Council of Ijara 3.8489

66. County Council of Homa Bay 4.0506

67. County Council of Siaya 4.1281

3. Town Councils


EXCELLENT

None

VERY GOOD

1. Town Council of Nyamache 2.2601

2. Town Council of Rongo 2.4266

3. Town Council of Molo 2.4290

4. Town Council of Ugunja 2.4310

5. Town Council of Kilifi 2.4613GOOD

6. Town Council of Malava 2.5028

7. Town Council of Chogoria 2.61298. Town Council of Kikuyu 2.6314

9. Town Council of Ukwala 2.6356

10. Town Council of Luanda 2.6598

11. Town Council of Mbita Point 2.6667

12. Town Council of Kangema 2.690913. Town Council of Sirisia 2.6933



54


14. Town Council of Malaba 2.706115. Town Council of Yala 2.7382

16. Town Council of Muhoroni 2.7610

17. Town Council of Olkalou 2.761718. Town Council of Makuyu 2.767319. Town Council of Nandi-Hills 2.7723

20. Town Council of Ogembo 2.7926

21. Town Council of Karuri 2.8705

22. Town Council of Awendo 2.8748

23. Town Council of Narok 2.8943

24. Town Council of Malakisi 2.9145

25. Town Council of Kwale 3.011426. Town Council of Eldama Ravine 3.0381

27. Town Council of Othaya 3.040428. Town Council of Keroka 3.0534

29. Town Council of Maragua 3.054930. Town Council of Bondo 3.0864

31. Town Council of Kipkelion 3.0887

32. Town Council of Kandara 3.1189

33.

Town Council of Burnt Forest 3.120734. Town Council of Wote 3.1281

35. Town Council of Maralal 3.1360

36. Town Council of Rumuruti 3.1443

37. Town Council of Funyula 3.1770

38. Town Council of Kangundo 3.180439. Town Council of Chepareria 3.3075

40. Town Council of Oyugis 3.3351

41. Town Council of Masimba 3.3405

42. Town Council of Mwingi 3.342743. Town Council of Iten-Tambach 3.3897

44. Town Council of Ahero 3.4138

45. Town Council of Mandera 3.4203



55


46. Town Council of Nyamira 3.4532

47. Town Council of Matuu 3.4681

48. Town Council of Mariakani 3.472249. Town Council of Sagana 3.4971

FAIR

50. Town Council of Nambale 3.5403

51. Town Council of Suneka 3.5849

POOR

52. Town Council of Nyansiongo 3.7525

53.

Town Council of Sotik 3.852654. Town Council of Port Victoria 3.9370

55. Town Council of Kendu Bay 4.0462

56. Town Council of Londiani 4.0563

57. Town Council of Taveta 4.059058. Town Council of Nyamarambe 4.1089

59. Town Council of Kajiado 4.3484

60. Town Council of Litein 4.3672

61. Town Council of Mtito Andei 4.572662. Town Council of Tabaka 4.6748



56

ANNEX VII

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS FOR TERTIARYINSTITUTIONS

No. TERTIARYINSTITUTION

PARENT MINISTRY COMPOSITESCORE

EXCELLENT

None

VERY GOOD

1. Kenya TechnicalTeachers College

Higher Education, Scienceand Technology

1.8619

2.

Eldoret Polytechnic Higher Education, Scienceand Technology 1.96613. Mawego Technical

Training InstituteHigher Education, Scienceand Technology

2.1175

4. Sigalagala TechnicalTraining Institute


2.1641

5. Rift Valley TechnicalTraining Institute


2.1657

6. Kenya Institute For TheBlind

Education 2.1881

7. Thika TechnicalTraining Institute


2.1954

8. Bumbe TechnicalTraining Institute


2.2177

9. Igoji Teachers TrainingCollege


2.2183

10. Nyeri TechnicalTraining Institute


2.2876

11. Kitale TechnicalTraining Institute


2.2943

12. Machakos TechnicalTraining Institute


2.3285

13. St. Mark's TeachersTraining College,Kigari

Education 2.3319

14. Rift Valley Institute of Science and Technology


2.3416

15. North Eastern ProvinceTechnical TrainingInstitute


2.3593

16. Coast Institute of Technology


2.4001



57



17. Kisumu Polytechnic Higher Education, Scienceand Technology

2.4088

18. Paramount Chief Kinyanjui TechnicalTraining Institute


2.4217

19. Mombasa TechnicalTraining Institute


2.4263

20. N’kabune TechnicalTraining Institute


2.4294

21. Michuki TechnicalTraining Institute


2.4353

22. Kaiboi TechnicalTraining Institute


2.4368

23. Meru TechnicalTraining Institute


2.4402

24. Murang'a TeachersTraining College

Education 2.4498

GOOD

25. Mathenge TechnicalTraining Institute


2.5238

26. Nairobi TechnicalTraining Institute


2.5305

27. Maasai TechnicalTraining Institute


2.5442

28. Ol'lessos TechnicalTaining Institute


2.5604

29.

Kiambu Institute of Science AndTechnology

Higher Education, Scienceand Technology 2.5752

30. Kirinyaga TechnicalInstitute of Technology


2.5990

31. Nyandarua Institute of Science and Technology


2.6059

32. Shanzu TeachersTraining College

Education 2.6232

33. Kaimosi TeachersTraining College

Education 2.6404

34. Machakos TeachersTraining College

Education 2.6519

35. Friends Kaimosi

College of Technology

Higher Education, Science

and Technology

2.6618

36. Bondo TeachersTraining College

Education 2.6945

37. Kabete TechnicalTraining Institute


2.7027



58



38. Kamwenja TeachersTraining College

Education 2.7164

39. Eregi Teachers TrainingCollege

Education 2.7452

40. Kagumo TeachersTraining College


2.7468

41. Garissa Teachers

Training College

Education 2.7494

42. Gusii Institute of Technology


2.7693

43. Asumbi TeachersTraining College

Education 2.8091

44. Tambach TeachersTraining College

Education 2.8279

45. Sang'alo Institute of Science and Technology


2.8373

46. Meru Teachers TrainingCollege

Education 2.8519

47. Murang'a College of Technology


2.8527

48. Kibabii DiplomaTeachers TrainingCollege


2.8532

49. Ramogi Institute of Technology


2.8538

50. Karen Technical

Training Institute ForThe Deaf


and Technology

2.8934

51. Moi Teachers College,Baringo

Education 2.9206

52. Thogoto TeachersTraining College

Education 2.9827

53. Mosoriot TeachersTraining College

Education 2.9960

54. Migori TeachersTraining College

Education 3.0311

55. Machakos TechnicalTraining Institute forThe Blind


3.0407

56. Kericho TeachersTraining College

Education 3.0947

57. Rwika Institute of Technology


3.2117

58. St. Johns TeachersTraining College,Kilimambogo

Education 3.2336



59



59. Moi Institute of Technology


3.4271

60. St. Joseph NyangomaTechnical TrainingInstitute for the Deaf


3.4881

FAIR

None

POOR

61. Siaya Institute of Technology


3.6011



60

ANNEX VIII

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS OF TERTIARYINSTITUTIONS BY PARENT MINISTRY

1. Tertiary institutions under Ministry of Higher Education, Scienceand Technology



EXCELLENT

None

VERY GOOD1. Kenya Technical

Teachers CollegeHigher Education, Scienceand Technology

1.8619

2. Eldoret Polytechnic Higher Education, Scienceand Technology

1.9661

3. Mawego TechnicalTraining Institute


2.1175

4. Sigalagala TechnicalTraining Institute


2.1641

5. Rift Valley TechnicalTraining Institute


2.1657

6. Thika TechnicalTraining Institute


2.1954

7. Bumbe TechnicalTraining Institute


2.2177

8. Igoji Teachers TrainingCollege


2.2183

9. Nyeri TechnicalTraining Institute


2.2876

10. Kitale TechnicalTraining Institute


2.2943

11. Machakos TechnicalTraining Institute


2.3285

12. Rift Valley Institute of Science and Technology


2.3416

13. North Eastern ProvinceTechnical TrainingInstitute


2.3593

14. Coast Institute of Technology


2.4001

15. Kisumu Polytechnic Higher Education, Scienceand Technology

2.4088



61



16. Paramount Chief Kinyanjui TechnicalTraining Institute


2.4217

17. Mombasa TechnicalTraining Institute


2.4263

18. N’kabune TechnicalTraining Institute


2.4294

19. Michuki TechnicalTraining Institute


2.4353

20. Kaiboi TechnicalTraining Institute


2.4368

21. Meru TechnicalTraining Institute


2.4402

GOOD22. Mathenge Technical

Training InstituteHigher Education, Scienceand Technology

2.5238

23. Nairobi TechnicalTraining Institute


2.5305

24. Maasai TechnicalTraining Institute


2.5442

25. Ol'lessos TechnicalTaining Institute


2.5604

26. Kiambu Institute of Science AndTechnology


2.5752

27. Kirinyaga Technical

Institute of Technology


and Technology

2.5990

28. Nyandarua Institute of Science and Technology


2.6059

29. Friends KaimosiCollege of Technology


2.6618

30. Kabete TechnicalTraining Institute


2.7027

31. Kagumo TeachersTraining College


2.7468

32. Gusii Institute of Technology


2.7693

33. Sang'alo Institute of Science and Technology


2.8373

34. Murang'a College of

Technology


and Technology

2.8527






PARENT MINISTRY FUNCTIONALCATEGORY

3. Murang'a TeachersTraining College

Education 2.4498

GOOD

4. Shanzu TeachersTraining College

Education 2.6232

5. Kaimosi TeachersTraining College

Education 2.6404

6. Machakos TeachersTraining College

Education 2.6519

7. Bondo TeachersTraining College

Education 2.6945

8. Kamwenja TeachersTraining College

Education 2.7164

9.

Eregi Teachers TrainingCollege Education 2.7452

10. Garissa Teachers

Training College

Education 2.7494

11. Asumbi TeachersTraining College

Education 2.8091

12. Tambach TeachersTraining College

Education 2.8279

13. Meru Teachers TrainingCollege

Education 2.8519

14. Moi Teachers College,Baringo

Education 2.9206

15. Thogoto Teachers

Training College

Education 2.9827

16. Mosoriot TeachersTraining College

Education 2.9960

17. Migori TeachersTraining College

Education 3.0311

18. Kericho TeachersTraining College

Education 3.0947

19. St. Johns TeachersTraining College,Kilimambogo

Education 3.2336

FAIR

None

POOR

Documents

Evaluation Report for FY 2009-2010 13-06-11