Wallace Beversdorf (Team Leader) Sylvie Brouder Paramjit (Pammi) Sachdeva Rasheed Sulaiman Deborah Templeton

Evaluation of the CGIAR Research Program

on Wheat

Volume 2 – Annexes

April 2015

This evaluation has been commissioned by the Independent Evaluation Arrangement (IEA) of CGIAR.

The Independent Evaluation Arrangement (IEA) of CGIAR encourages fair use of this material provided proper citation is made.

Correct citation: CGIAR-IEA (2015) Annexes to the Evaluation of CGIAR Research Program on Wheat. Rome, Italy: Independent Evaluation Arrangement (IEA) of CGIAR iea.cgiar.org

http://iea.cgiar.org/

1

Wheat Evaluation, Annexes, April 2015

iea.cgiar.org

Table of contents

ANNEX A. - Evaluation Team Members – Short Bios ........................................... 2

ANNEX B. - Country visits ..................................................................................... 3

ANNEX C. - List of people met .............................................................................. 5

ANNEX D. - List of sample projects ..................................................................... 18

ANNEX E. - Assessment of publications ............................................................. 21

ANNEX F. - WHEAT researcher survey ............................................................... 26

ANNEX G. - Sample project assessment - TEMPLATE ......................................... 49

ANNEX H. - Peer review scoring of a random sample of publications – TEMPLATE 54

2

Wheat Evaluation, Annexes, April 2015

iea.cgiar.org

ANNEX A. - Evaluation Team Members – Short Bios

Wallace (Wally) Beversdorf - Evaluation Team Leader. Since 2005 Wally has been an independent consultant, involved in several reviews of research, including CSIRO Flagship program reviews and 2007 mid-term review of the Generation Challenge Program. Before 2005 he worked over 10 years in the private seed sector, including positions as Head of Novartis world-wide R&D, Head of Syngenta Plant Science and Vice President for Syngenta Biotechnology. He has also worked in the academia, holding positions at the Guelph University. He has a PhD in plant breeding and genetics.

Sylvie Brouder - Evaluation Team Member. Since 2005 Sylvie has served as Professor of Agronomy at Purdue University where she has been working for nearly 20 years. She is also Director of the Purdue University Water Quality Field Station. Her research interests include crop nutrient use efficiency, agroecosystem viability and sustainability and ecophysiology linked to abiotic stress tolerance. Through her teaching, outreach and consultancy activities she has been involved in international agricultural research and science agenda development. She has PhD in ecology.

Deborah (Debbie) Templeton - Evaluation Team Member. Until September 2013 Debbie worked for ACIAR for over 10 years primarily managing the Impact Assessment program. Between ACIAR employment, Debbie also worked for 3 years as social scientist (impact assessment specialist) at IRRI. She has experience in capacity building in research evaluation and impact assessment and in managing and conducting impact assessments. She has PhD in economics.

Rasheed Sulaiman - Evaluation Team Member. Rasheed is the Director of the Centre for Research on Innovation and Science Policy in India (since 2006). Prior to that, he worked as senior scientist at the National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research at ICAR. He has expertise in agricultural extension systems and policy, and agricultural innovation system. His research also covers the role of private sector and public-private partnerships, developing new approaches to reaching rural women and evaluation of ICTs in agriculture. He has a PhD in agricultural extension.

Paramjit (Pammi) Sachdeva - Evaluation Team Member. Pammi is specialized in program and institutional assessment and HR management with expertise also in capacity development, systems analysis and organizational design. Since 2001 he has worked as an independent consultant and been involved in a number of external reviews of CGIAR Centers and programs, and in international development project and human resource management consultancies. Previously he worked at the World Bank as senior management specialist and advisor and earlier in his career at ISNAR as senior research officer. He has a PhD in social systems sciences.

3

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

ANNEX B. - Country visits Date Country Team

members Main schedule

21-24 Sep Turkey WB, DT Ankara visit CIMMYT/ICARDA office Visit research institutes

Izmir Visit Regional Cereal Rust Research Center in the Aegean Agricultural Research Institute

24-26 Sep Lebanon WB, DT Beirut Terbol, AREC, Kfardan LARI ICARDA offices in Beirut

26 Sep – 1 Oct

Ethiopia WB, DT Addis Ababa Meeting with ICARDA & CIMMYT staff and presentation on Collaborative Activities with Ethiopian NARS

WB, DT Debre Zeit Debre Zeit ARC, Green house, single race & international nurseries, breeding activities, seed producers & farmers seed producers, on farm trials and Gonde seed farm

WB, DT Asella KARC, irrigation facility, international and single race nurseries, seed labs, Breeding and Seed Activities

WB, DT Addis Ababa EIAR Quality Lab and Meeting with EIAR management 1-4 Oct Morocco WB, DT Casablanca INRA campus (greenhouse, biotech of INRA, quality lab and future building of

ICARDA) Meeting with ICARDA staff Bread wheat presentation, Durum wheat presentation

4

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

Date Country Team members

Main schedule

Marchouch Marchouch station (all wheat personnel attending) Annoceur Annoceur station, visit of durum off-season.

Focus on RWA screening. Gigu Arrival to farmers communities in Gigu together with professor

Boulif (ENA Meknes), presentation of farmers school (ICARDA's contribution) and of IFAD activities on-farm in Meknes area, visit of the farm and lunch with farmers

8—13 Nov Bangladesh RS WRC Dinajpur meet with WRC Scientists and DAE (Department of Agricultural Extension) and BADC (Bangladesh Agriculture Development Corporation

RS Rangpur Discuss with CSISA-CIMMYT, SRFSI staff and OFRD/BARI Scientists NGO partners (RDRS, etc.)

RS Dhaka Discuss with BARI authorities/Seed Certification Agency 14-17 Nov India RS

SB Arra and Patna

Zero tillage wheat sowing, interaction with service providers, farmers , KVK and other partners

RS SB

Samatipur, Pusa

Visit fields with bed planting, zero tillage intercropping of maize and interaction with women farmers in Bandra Visit to BISA farm-Pusa Interaction with Head, IARI Research Station of RAU officials Interaction with ICAR and other partners in ICAR complex-Patna

5

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

ANNEX C. - List of people met SURNAME, Name Position Organization Country visit

Abeyo, Bekele Wheat Breeder, Global Wheat Program CIMMYT Ethiopia

Abinasa, Mohammed Wheat Breeder ICARDA Ethiopia

Adhikari, Mani Krishna ADO CIMMYT Bangladesh

Afram, Michel Antoine President – Director General Lebanese Agricultural Research Institute Lebanon

Aliy, Sheriff Research Extension Specialist – Technology Promotion Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center EIAR Ethiopia

Amil, Rola PhD Student ICARDA Lebanon

Amri, Ahmed Head, Genetic Resources Section ICARDA Morocco

Andaloussi, Abbad Head , Plant Protection Department INRA Morocco

Asaad, Siham Head, ICARDA’s Seed Health Laboratories ICARDA Lebanon

Atilaw, Abebe Director, Technology Multiplication Directorate and Coordinator, Deployment of Rust Resistant Wheat Varieties in Ethiopia EIAR Ethiopia

Austin, Nick Chief Executive Officer of ACIAR, Pacific Countries representative on the CGIAR Fund Council ACIAR Australia

Badstue, Lone Gender Specialist, SEP CIMMYT Mexico

Bakshi, Elahi Applied Ag Economist CIMMYT Bangladesh

Bandyopadhyay, Ranajit Pathologist ICARDA Mexico

Bänziger, Marianne Deputy Director General Research & Partnership CIMMYT Mexico

6

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

SURNAME, Name Position Organization Country visit

Barma, Naresh Ch Deb Chief Scientific Officer BARI, Gazipur Bangladesh

Bassi, Fillipo Durum Wheat Breeder ICARDA Morocco

Baum, Michael Director - BIGMP CIMMYT Mexico

Bennani, Sahar

INRA Morocco

Bhatt, B. P Director ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region India

Bishaw, Zewdie Head, Seed Section ICARDA Ethiopia

Bodruzzaman, Md Principal Scientific Officer (Soils) Wheat Research Center, Dinakpur Bangladesh

Braun, Hans Program Director Global Wheat Program CIMMYT Mexico

Briones, Ernesto Senior Systems Developer IITA Mexico

Chand, Ramesh Professor-cum-Plant Pathologist Banaras Hindu University Obrégon

Chanyalew, Solomon Center Director, Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center EIAR Ethiopia

Chatrath, R Principal Scientist Directorate of Wheat Research (DWR), Karnal, ICAR India

Chikoye, David R4D Director, IITA-Southern Africa IITA Mexico

Chowdhury, S. Consultant Borlaug Institute for South Asia India

7

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

SURNAME, Name Position Organization Country visit Coffman, Ronnie Principal Investigator, Durable Rust Resistance Prog Cornell University Obrégon

Dababat, Amer Plant Pathologist and Nematologist Global Wheat Program

CIMMYT Turkey

Datta, Swapan K Deputy Director General (Crop Science) Indian Council of Ag Research Obrégon De la O Elizagaray, Marisa Manager, Risk Management & International Policy CIMMYT Mexico

Debele, Tolessa SARD-SC Coordinator for ESA ICARDA Ethiopia

Degite, Gemechu Chair Ethiopian Seed Enterprise (ESE) Gonde-Iteya Basic Seed Farm Ethiopia

Dessalegn, Tadesse

Technical Coordinator, East African Agricultural Productivity Project Wheat Regional Center of Excellence Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center EIAR Ethiopia

Dixon, John Principal Adviser Research and Cropping Systems and Economics (CSE) program manager.

ACIAR Australia

Duveiller, Etienne Director of Research for South Asia CIMMYT Obrégon

Dwivedi, P K Programme Coordinator Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Buxar India

El Bouhssini, Mustapha Entomologist ICARDA Morocco

El Hassouni , Khaoula sponsored by GRDC

Morocco

Erenstein, Olaf Program Director, Socioeconomics Program CIMMYT Mexico

Figueroa, Pedro Plant Pthologise in National Wheat Program INIFAP Obrégon

Firke, Asnake Director, Crop Research EIAR Ethiopia

Fisher, Tony Honorary Research Fellow at CSIRO, Member of WHEAT Stakeholder Committee CSIRO Australia

8

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

SURNAME, Name Position Organization Country visit

Freymond, Jean Secretary SASAKAWA Africa Association Obrégon

Fulss, Richard Head, Knowledge Management CIMMYT Mexico

Gathala, Mahesh Cropping System Agronomist, Leader SRFSI CIMMYT Bangladesh

Gérard, Bruno Program Director, Global Conservation Agriculture CIMMYT Mexico

Ghosh, Anup Kumar Senior Agricultural officer

Resilient Farming Systems Intensification (SRFSI) Project, RDRS Bangladesh

Girma, Bedada Durable Rust Resistant Program, Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center EIAR Ethiopia

Govaerts, Bram Associate Director, Global Conservation Agriculture CIMMYT Mexico (Texcoco and Obrégon)

Guertin, Michelle Senior Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning Specialist CIMMYT Skype

Gupta, Pryianka sponsored Borlaug Scholarship Individual Morocco

Gupta, R K Principal Scientist Directorate of Wheat Research (DWR), Karnal, ICAR India

Gutterson, Neal President, CEO Mendel Biotechnology Obrégon

Haddad, Nicolas Manager, Agricultural Research and Education Center (AREC) American University of Beirut Lebanon

Hannan, Abdul Deputy Director Department of Agricultural Extension Bangladesh

Haque, Anarul Extension Agronomist, CSISA, Hub Manager, Rangpur CIMMYT Bangladesh

Harris, Abdul Principal Scientists Agronomy ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region India

9

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

SURNAME, Name Position Organization Country visit

Hassen, Haloma Consultant in small ruminant research ICARDA Morocco

Hearne, Sara Senior Scientist, Maize Molecular Geneticist/Pre-breeder CIMMYT Mexico

Herremans, Anna (former) Director, International Finance CIMMYT Mexico

Hassan, Selima Sr Scientific Officer BARI, On Farm Research Division, Rangpur Bangladesh

Hobbs, Huntington Leader, Strategic Planning and Research Coordination, MasAgro CIMMYT Mexico

Hodson, David GIS and Decision Support Systems SEP CIMMYT Ethiopia

Homma, Shitaye Durum Wheat Breeder, Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center EIAR Ethiopia

Hossain, Akbar Senior Agronomist Wheat Research Center, Dinakpur Bangladesh

Hossain, Mofazzul Deputy Director Seed Marketing Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation Bangladesh

Hossain, Monwar Scientific Officer (Plant Breeding) Wheat Research Center, Dinakpur Bangladesh

Hossain, Zakir Scientific Officer (Agricultral Engineer) Wheat Research Center, Dinakpur Bangladesh

Hundie, Bekele Plant Pathologist, Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center EIAR Ethiopia

Huttner, Eric Research Program Manager, Crop Improvement & Management ACIAR Obrégon and Australia

Idris, Mohammad Principal Scientist (Entomology) ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region India

10

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

SURNAME, Name Position Organization Country visit

Iraqi, Driss Coordinator, Biotechnology Unit INRA Morocco Jahan (Belal), Abu Hena Sorwar Principal Scientific Officer BARI, Gazipur Bangladesh

Jakobi, Nina WHEAT Program Assistant CRP Mexico

Jaleta, Moti Agricultural Economist SEP CIMMYT Ethiopia

Jat, H S Cropping Systems Agronomist, CSISA Central Soil Salinity Research Institute India

Jat, M L Senior Cropping Systems Agronomicst & CIMMYT-CCAFS South Asia Coordinator, CIMMYT CIMMYT India

Jat, Raj Kumar Cropping Systems Agronomist Borlaug Institute for South Asia India

Kaan, Kathy Program Manager BMGF Obrégon Kan, Mustafa Agricultural Economist, Department of Economy, Statistic and Extension Bahri Dagdas International

Agricultural Research Institute Turkey

Karim, Rezaul Upzilla Agricultural Officer Department of Agricultural Extension Bangladesh

Kassie, Grima T Agricultural Economist, SEPRP ICARDA Morocco

Keil, Alwin Senior Agricultural Economist CIMMYT India

Kemal, Seid Ahmad Pathologist ICARDA Ethiopia SURNAME, Name Position Organization Country visit

Keser, Mesut IWWIP, Coordinator for ICARDA ICARDA Turkey

11

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

Kircalioğlu, Gün Research Coordinator Aegean Agricultural Research Institute

Turkey

Kiwan, Pierre Assistant Researcher , Terbol Research Station ICARDA Lebanon

Kommerell, Victor WHEAT Program Manager CIMMYT Mexico

Kumar, Mithilesh Director of Research Rajendra Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur India

Kumar, Virender Cropping Systems Agronomist CIMMYT India

Legesse, Wasihun Wheat Breeder , Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center EIAR Ethiopia

Listman, Michael G. Senior Science Writer, Corporate Communications CIMMYT Mexico

Lopez Saavedra, Victor Manager of Institutional Relations TTF-MasAgro CIMMYT Mexico

Lopez, Diana Project Management Unit CIMMYT Mexico

Lumpkin, Thomas DG CIMMYT Mexico

Machlab, Hassan Country Manager/Lebanon ICARDA Lebanon

Malaker, Paritosh Kumar Director Wheat Research Center, Dinakpur Bangladesh

Mallari, Sally MAIZE Program Assistant CIMMYT Mexico

Mallik, R. S. Senior Agronomist And Csisa Objective 1 Leader CIMMYT India

Mamo, Beditu Chair

Memher Agera Seed Multiplication and Marketing Cooperative Ethiopia

12

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

SURNAME, Name Position Organization Country visit

Medina, Richard Director, Internal Audit CIMMYT Mexico Members of the Mahila Kisan Sakhi CSISA - Bihar, Mahila Samaykhya, Muzaffarpur n/a India

Mendoza, Fernando P Senior Internal Auditor IITA Mexico

Menkir, Abebe Team leader for maize improvement research at IITA, Focal Point for CRP at IITA IITA Mexico Mert, Zafer Phytopathologist / Plant pathologist, Department of Crop Diseases and Resistance

Breeding The Central Research Institute for Field Crops (TARM), Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock (MFAL)

Turkey

Mir, Patricia V Risk Management Analyst CIMMYT Mexico

Mishra, Satya Prakash Officer VST Tillers Tractors Ltd India

Mishra, V.K. Professor, Dept. of Genetics and Plant Breeding Banaras Hindu University Obrégon

Mitiku, Demessie Seed Agronomist, Supporting Seed Demonstration for Private Seed Growers AMUARI High Yield Varieties and Agricultural Products PLC Ethiopia

Mittal, Surabhi Economist CIMMYT India

Miyamoto, Masaaki Chief Executive Officer SASAKAWA Africa Association Obrégon

Momin, Abdul Cropping Systems Agronomist, Manager-CSISA Jessore Hub CIMMYT Bangladesh

Nachit, Miloudi Former Durum Wheat Breeder and now Consultant with focus on pre-breeding and on farm trials ICARDA Morocco

Nasserlehaq, Nsarellah Durum Wheat Breeder INRA Morocco

Nawar, Fawzy Senior documentation specialist, Genetic Resources Section ICARDA Morocco

13

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

SURNAME, Name Position Organization Country visit Nazari, Kumarse Plant Pathologist, Cereal Rust Regional Center ICARDA Turkey

Ortiz Monasterio, Ivan Agronomist, Wheat Harvest Coordinator CIMMYT Mexico

Ozdemir, Fatih Director, Bahri Dagdas International Agricultural Research Institute, IWWIP Coordinator for Turkey

BDIARI Turkey

Ozkan, Isa Head, Field Crops Research Department MFAL Turkey

Pandit, D B Cropping Systems Agronomist, Manager-CSISA Mymensingh CIMMYT Bangladesh

Payne, Thomas S. CIMMYT Board Secretary CIMMYT Mexico

Peksuslu, Ali Director, AEGEAN Agricultural Research Institute Turkey

Pfeiffer, Wolfgang H Deputy Director, Operations HarvestPlus Obrégon

Pixley, Kevin Program Director, Genetic Resources Program CIMMYT Mexico

Powell, Wayne Chief Science Officer CGIAR Obrégon

Rahman, Ataur Specialist Conservation Agriculture BARI, Gazipur Bangladesh

Rajasekharan, Nellooli P. Director, International Human Resources CIMMYT Mexico

Rashid, Mamunur A&E Coordinator

Resilient Farming Systems Intensification (SRFSI) Project, RDRS Bangladesh

Renard, Geneviève MAIZE and WHEAT Communication Specialis GCP Mexico

Reynolds, Mathew Head Wheat Physiology CIMMYT Obrégon

Reza, Mustafa Alir Senior Scientific Officer, (Wheat Pathology) Wheat Research Center, Dinakpur Bangladesh

14

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

SURNAME, Name Position Organization Country visit

Ribaut, Jean-Marcel Director, Generation Challenge Program CIMMYT Mexico

Riis-Jacobsen, Jens Director of Int. Systems and Information Technology CIMMYT Mexico

Rodriguez, Horacio MasAgro Extension Coordinator CIMMYT Mexico

Rorisa, Bejiqa Cooperative Farmer

Guchi Habe Badosa Bread Wheat and Seed Multiplication and Value Chain Cooperative Ethiopia

Rossi, Frederik Agricultural Economist, Manager-CSISA Faridpur Hub CIMMYT Bangladesh

Rugema, Hilary Coordinator, Crop Productivity Improvement SASAKAWA Africa Association Obrégon

Saidi, Seddik Head, Plant Breeding Department INRA Morocco

Saint Pierre, Carolina Scientist, Wheat Phenotyping Coordinator SeeD CIMMYT Obrégon

Sanchez –Garcia, Miguel Spring Wheat Breeder ICARDA Morocco

SanVicente, Felix Breeding lead for the tropics in Mexico CIMMYT Mexico

Sarker, Abu Zaman Princial Scientific Officer (Agronomy) Wheat Research Center, Dinakpur Bangladesh

Sayem, Abu Regional Director Agricultural Information Service (Ministry of Agriculture) Bangladesh

Schulthess, Urs Crop modeler, Global Conservation Agricultural program CIMMYT Mexico

Sefera, Tadessa Center Director, Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center EIAR Ethiopia

Segovia, Vanessa Post Doctorial Fellow ICARDA Turkey

Senthil, R. Principal Scientist Directorate of Wheat Research (DWR), Karnal, ICAR India

15

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

SURNAME, Name Position Organization Country visit

Shahjahan, Md Croping Systems Agronomist, , Manager-CSISA Khulna Hub CIMMYT Bangladesh

Sharma, Indu Director and Member, Wheat Management Committee (CRP-Wheat) Directorate of Wheat Research (DWR), Karnal, ICAR India

Sharma, P C Head, Crop Improvement Central Soil Salinity Research Institute India

Sharma, R K Principal Scientist Directorate of Wheat Research (DWR), Karnal, ICAR India

Short, Thomas W. DDG Support Services CIMMYT Mexico

Silim, Said Nahdy Country Manager ICARDA Ethiopia and Coordinator Sub-Saharan Africa Regional Program ICARDA Ethiopia

Sim, Graham Director, International Finance CIMMYT Mexico

Singh, Ravi P Head, Bread Wheat Improvement & Rust Res CIMMYT Obrégon

Singh, Satyavir Principal Scientist Directorate of Wheat Research (DWR), Karnal, ICAR India

Sohail, Quahir Spring Wheat Breeder ICARDA Morocco

Solanki, I S Head Indian Agricultural Research Institute India

Solh, Mahmoud DG ICARDA Lebanon

Souihka, Allah Manager, Marchouch Station ICARDA Morocco

Sugandhi, ? Gender Cordinator, CSISA CIMMYT India

Tadessa, Zerihun National Coordinator, Wheat Program EIAR Ethiopia

Tadesse, Wuletaw Bread Wheat Breeder ICARDA Morocco SURNAME, Name Position Organization Country visit

16

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

Tafesse, Mekasha Driver and Logistical Assistant ICARDA Ethiopia

Tanwir, Niayer Secretary Creation Welfacer Society India

Tawkaz, Sawsan Head, ICARDA’s Double Haploid Laboratory ICARDA Lebanon

Teklu, Kifle Participating Farmer

Memher Agera Seed Multiplication and Marketing Cooperative Ethiopia

Tesfaye, Bezabih Seed Specialist AMUARI High Yield Varieties and Agricultural Products PLC Ethiopia

Tessema, Alemu Chair Denkaka Megertu Cooperative Ethiopia

Thornton, Matthew Hub Coordinator CIMMYT Mexico

Tiwari, Ratan Principal Scientist Directorate of Wheat Research (DWR), Karnal, ICAR India

Tiwari, T. P. Cropping System Agronomist & Country Representative CIMMYT Bangladesh Tovar Mondragon, Jose Ramiro Manager, Financial Planning CIMMYT Mexico

Trachsel, Sam Scientist, Global Maize Program CIMMYT Mexico

Tsivelikas, Athanasios Genebank Manager ICARDA Morocco

Uddin, Mohdi Cropping System Agronomist, Manager-CSISA Faridpur Hub CIMMYT Bangladesh

Udupa, Sripada Senior Scientist, Biotechnology, ICARDA Morocco

van Ginkel, Maarten DDGR ICARDA Lebanon

Wakjira, Adunga Deputy Director General EIAR Ethiopia

17

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

SURNAME, Name Position Organization Country visit

Ward, Rick Principal Scientist, Global Wheat Program CIMMYT Obrégon

Watson, David MAIZE Program Manager CIMMYT Mexico

Willcox, Martha Senior Scientist working with the Seeds Discovery (SeeD) project CIMMYT Mexico

Worku, Zewuditu Woman Farmer n/a Ethiopia

Yai, Kebede Cooperative Farmer

Guchi Habe Badosa Bread Wheat and Seed Multiplication and Value Chain Cooperative Ethiopia

Yasmin, Samina Cropping Systems Agronomist, Manager-CSISA Barisal Hub CIMMYT Bangladesh

Yazbek, Mariana Post Doc Fellow, Genetic Resources ICARDA Lebanon

Zaim, Meryem sponsored by GRDC n/a Morocco

Zehr, Usha Barwale Chief Technology Officer, Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Ltd. MAHYCO Obrégon

18

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

ANNEX D. - List of sample projects A total of 40 projects were selected from the project database. These included the 10 largest projects (according to the budget allocated to WHEAT) as well as 30 projects which were randomly selected by Flagship. Projects had to be replaced from the initial selection and some projects utlimately could not be reviewed because information was found insufficient or was only available in Spanish, or treated as confidential. The evaluation team looked at a total of 34 projects listed below: No Title FP Lead A4031.09.19 Accelerating adoption of yellow rust resistance winter varieties in Central Asia 4 Other

A4031.09.24 The Potential for Wheat Production in Sub-Saharan Africa: Analysis of Biophysical Suitability and Economic Profitability 1 CIMMYT

A4031.0918 Enhanced quality and healthy seed testing system for International Winter Wheat Improvement Program (IWWIP) 3 Other

B 1198 Enhancing cotton germplasm, improving resistance to cotton leaf curl virus and supporting cotton best management practices for small farmers. 4 ICARDA

B1146 Joint ICARDA-ARC Wheat Improvement Program 2 ICARDA B1202 Pakistan Wheat production enhancement 3+4+5 ICARDA B1202 Pakistan Wheat Production Enhancement Initiative 2+3+5 ICARDA B1287 Support to Agricultural Research for Development of Strategic Crops in Africa (SARD-SC)‘ 5 ICARDA B1313 Wheat Productivity Improvement towards Food Self-sufficiency 5 ICARDA B1355 and 1356 Mobilizing Novel Genes from Wheat 2 CIMMYT/ICARDA

C0035 Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA)-Phase II 4 CIMMYT

19

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

No Title FP Lead C0037 Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA)-India 4 CIMMYT C0040 MASAGRO-Desarrollo sustentable con el agricultor 4 CIMMYT C0064 Africa Rising: Research in Sustainable Intensification for the next generation 4 CIMMYT

n/a

Wheat Addressing the challenge of climate change for sustainable food security in Turkey, Iran, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Morocco and Spain through the exploitation of wheat Genetic Resources, adoption of resilient improved varieties on farmers fields and their socio-economic impact. 2 CIMMYT

R0148 MASAGRO-Descubriendo la diversidad genética de las semillas 4 CIMMYT T0083 Expansion of the Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA) in Bangladesh 4 CIMMYT W 0286 Development of Heat Tolerant Wheat for South Asia 3 CIMMYT

W0101 Desarrollo de nuevas variedades de trigo duro, trigo harinero y triticale a partir de germoplasma procedente del CIMMYT-Phase III 3 CIMMYT

W0204 Identification and utilization of novel sources of resistance against soil borne pathogens in wheat (CIM00014) 3 CIMMYT W0205 Enhanced Delivery of CIMMYT Germplasm to Australia 3 CIMMYT

W0212 Development of Cereal Germplasm and the Screening for Disease Resistance and End-Use Quality: CIMMYT - Triticale Improvement Component 3 CIMMYT

W0235 Identifying new genetic sources and evaluating United States wheat germplasm for resistance to stem rust in Eastern Africa (25856) 3 CIMMYT W0239 Pakistan Wheat production enhancement 3+4+5 CIMMYT

20

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

No Title FP Lead W0250 Durable Rust Resistance in Wheat (Phase II 3 CIMMYT

W0252 Genetics and Physiology of Wheat Development to Flowering: Tool to breed for improved adaptation and yield potential: 2 CIMMYT

W0265 Sustainable Wheat & Maize Production in Afghanistan ( 5 CIMMYT W0266 Agricultural Innovation Programme 4 CIMMYT W0269 KAI-Agricultural Technologies in Kazakhstan 3 CIMMYT W0273 Joint Development of Korean Winter Bread Wheat Lines with heat tolerance and high protein n/a CIMMYT W0276 Russia-Omsk Institute 3 CIMMYT W0281 Field evaluation of Genetically Modified Wheat 2 CIMMYT W0289 Rapid Development of Climate Resilient Wheat Varieties for South Asia using Genomic Selection 2+3 CIMMYT W1/2 activity Socioeconomics & policies for wheat futures, 1 CIMMYT

21

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

ANNEX E. - Assessment of publications Selection of individual publications for assessment The team intended to assess 37 publications in total. The publications were categorized according to the Center that issued them (CIMMYT and ICARDA) and to discipline (i.e. whether they related to agronomy, breeding or socio-economics). Target numbers were then developed based on how many publications each Center had published in the 3 disciplines (see Table 1 below). Publications for assessment were then selected randomly from the database according to these target numbers.

Table 1 - Criteria for selection of sample publications

SAMPLE ACTUAL

CIMMYT ICARDA TOTAL CIMMYT ICARDA

CIMMYT ICARDA

Agronomy 85% 15% 10 9 1 6 1 Socio-economics 71% 29% 6 4 2 5 2 Breeding 75% 25% 21 17 4 19 3 Number of Publications 30 7 30 6

After all publications had been identified, an assessor was assigned for each one, bearing in mind the areas of competence, expertise and experience of the assessors. Some of the publications were re-classified (especially some of the agronomy publications which related more to breeding). One publications by

22

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

ICARDA was not assessed, as it could not be accessed (Genome-wide association mapping for five major pest resistances in wheat, Molecular Breed). The total of 36 publications assessed by the evaluation team are shown in the table below.

Team member YEAR Title JOURNAL

CENTER Type

SB 2012 Achieving yield gains in wheat Plant, Cell & Environment (5.14 in 2012, year of publication CIMMYT Breeding

DT 2012 Agricultural Extension, Collective Action and Innovation Systems: Lessons on Network Brokering from Peru and Mexico The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension

CIMMYT Socio econ

RS 2012 Analysis of genotypic variation for NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) and its relationship with grain yield in winter wheat under terminal heat stress Plant Breeding 131(2012) ICARDA Breeding

WB 2012 Analysis of leaf and stripe rust severities reveals pathotype changes and multiple minor QTLs associated with resistance in an Avocet × Pastor wheat population TAG 2012 CIMMYT Breeding

RS 2012 Breeding progress for yield in winter wheat genotypes targeted to irrigated environments of the CWANA region Euphytica (2013) ICARDA Breeding

RS 2012 Conservation Agriculture in Maize- and Wheat-Based Systems in the (Sub)tropics: Lessons from Adaptation Initiatives in South Asia, Mexico, and Southern Africa Journal of Sustainable Agriculture (2012)

CIMMYT Socio econ

RS 2012 Conservation agriculture, increased organic carbon in the top-soil macro-aggregates and reduced soil CO 2 emissions Plant Soil (2012) CIMMYT Agronomy

DT 2012 Food sovereignty or the human right to adequate food: which concept serves better as international development policy for global hunger and poverty reduction?

Agric Hum Values (2012) CIMMYT

Socio econ

23

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

Team member YEAR Title JOURNAL

CENTER Type

WB 2012 From genotype × environment interaction to gene × environment interaction by Crossa, J Current Genomics Current Genomics 2012 CIMMYT Breeding

RS 2012 Genetic structures of the CIMMYT international yield trial targeted to irrigated environments Mol Breeding CIMMYT Breeding

WB 2012 Genetic yield gains and changes in associated traits of CIMMYT spring bread wheat in a "Historic" set representing 30 years of Breeding Crop Science, 2012 CIMMYT Breeding

WB 2012 Genetic yield gains of the CIMMYT International semi-arid wheat yield Crop Science (2012) CIMMYT Breeding

SB 2012 Global Crop Improvement Networks to Bridge Technology Gaps J. of Exp. Botany (5.242 for 2012 – year of publication) CIMMYT Agronomy

RS 2012 Global incidence of wheat rusts and powdery mildew during 1969-2010 and durability of resistance of winter wheat variety Bezostaya 1 Eur J Plant Pathol Breeding

WB 2012 Lr68: A new gene conferring slow rusting resistance to leaf rust in wheat Theoretical and Applied Genetics CIMMYT Breeding WB 2012 Multi-trait and multi-environment QTL analyses for resistance to wheat diseases Open Access PLOS-One (2012) CIMMYT Breeding

DT 2012 Performance of biofortified spring wheat genotypes in target environments for grain zinc and iron concentrations Field Crops Research 137 (2012) CIMMYT Breeding

WB 2012 Phenotyping transgenic wheat for drought resistance (2012) Journal of Experimental Botany CIMMYT Breeding

SB 2012 Physiological Traits for Improving Heat Tolerance in Wheat Plant Physiology (6.56 in year of publication, 2012) CIMMYT Breeding

24

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

Team member YEAR Title JOURNAL

CENTER Type

SB 2012 Quantifying how winter wheat crops accumulate and use nitrogen reserves during growth Field Crops Research (2.47 in year of publication, 2012)

CIMMYT Agronomy

SB 2012 Stay-green in spring wheat can be determined by spectral reflectance measurements (normalized difference vegetation index) independently from phenology

J. of Experimental Botany (5.242 for 2012 – year of publication)

CIMMYT Breeding

DT 2012 The Production Functions of Wheat Production in Turkey Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 18 (No 2) 2012 ICARDA Socio econ

SB 2012 The yield correlations of selectable physiological traits in populations of advanced spring wheat lines grown in warm and drought environments Field Crops Research; CIMMYT Breeding

WB 2012 Virulence of Beauveria bassiana against Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) at different time periods of application Journal of Entomology and Nematology (2012)

ICARDA Agronomy

RS 2013 Assessing the impacts of GAFTA on selected members’ bilateral agricultural trade: an application of the Gravity Model. Am-Euras. J. Agric. & Environ. Science (2013)

ICARDA Socio econ

DT 2013 Crops that feed the world 10. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by wheat in global food security Food Sec. (2013) CIMMYT Socio econ

RS 2013 Earliness in wheat: A key to adaptation under terminal and continual high temperature stress in South Asia Field Crops Research (2013) CIMMYT Agronomy

WB 2013 Genetic analysis of adult plant resistance to yellow rust and leaf rust in common spring wheat Plant Disease (2013) CIMMYT Breeding

25

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

Team member YEAR Title JOURNAL

CENTER Type

SB 2013 Historical changes in grain yield and quality of spring wheat varieties cultivated in Siberia from 1900 to 2010 Canadian Journal of Plant Science CIMMYT Breeding

SB 2013 Identification and characterization of international Fusarium head blight screening nurseries of wheat at CIMMYT, Mexico J. Plant Pathology (1.71 in 2013, year of publication)

CIMMYT Breeding

RS 2013 Meta: A suite of sas programs to analyze multienvironment Breed trials Agronomy Journal Volume 105, Issue 1, 2013 CIMMYT Agronomy

SB 2013 Mineral nitrogen dynamics in irrigated rice-wheat system under different irrigation and establishment methods and residue levels in arid drylands of Central Asia

European Journal of Agronomy (2.92)

CIMMYT Agronomy

WB 2013 QTL mapping of slow-rusting, adult plant resistance to race Ug99 of stem rust fungus in PBW343/Muu RIL population TAG 2013 CIMMYT Breeding

WB 2014 Association Mapping of Resistance to Yellow Rust in Winter Wheat Cultivars and Elite Genotypes Crop Science (2014) ICARDA Breeding

DT 2014 From adoption claims to understanding farmers and contexts: A literature review of Conservation Agriculture (CA) adoption among smallholder farmers in southern Africa

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 187 (2014) 116–132

CIMMYT Socio econ

DT 2014 Meeting demands for increased cereal production in China Journal of Cereal Science 59 (2014) 235e244 CIMMYT Breeding

26

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

ANNEX F. - WHEAT researcher survey Sent out: 13 Nov 2014 Reminder sent by CIMMYT: 2 Dec 2014 Closed: 11 Dec 2014

Total CIMMYT ICARDA Other (competitive partner grants)

Survey sent to 109 58 32 19 Responses 66 43 15 9 Response rate 61% 74% 47% 47% Complete Reponses 43 28 9 6 Completed response rate 39% 48% 28% 32%

27

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

Survey population

MALE 81.8%

FEMALE 18.2%

Gender (Q2)

Program/FP leader/theme leader , 12.1%

Principle Investigator/Se

nior scientist 45.5%

Associate scientist/Post

doctoral fellow , 22.7%

Research Fellow , 0.0%

Other (please specify) 19.7% Position (Q3)

28

Wheat Evaluation

iea.cgiar.org

since 2012, 20, 30%

2008-2011, 21, 32%

pre 2008, 25, 38%

Working with org since (Q5)

Crop sciences 77.3%

Natural resource

sciences 4.5%

Social sciences , 7.6%

Informatics 1.5%

Other (please specify) 9.1%

Research area (Q4)

Afghanistan , 1.5% Bangladesh , 4.5% China 3.0%

Ethiopia , 3.0%

Germany, 1.5%

India , 9.1%

Jordan 1.5%

Lebanon , 3.0%

Mexico 33.3%Morocco 10.6%

Nepal 4.5%

Pakistan , 3.0%

South Africa , 3.0%Syria, 3.0%

Tunisia 1.5%

Turkey 10.6%

Uzbekistan 3.0%

Duty station (Q6)

29

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

CRP engagement

11

42

17

14

25

810

3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

less than 30% 40-70% More than 80%

For which CRP(s) do you currently work? (Q7)

MAIZE

WHEAT

Other CRPs

30

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

less than 30%, 17, 30%

40-70%, 14, 25%

More than 80%, 25, 45%

Working for WHEAT..... (Q7)

15 17

10

34

2621

94

9

18

8

05

10152025303540 SI mentioned in top 3 (Q8)

31

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

13

29

39

28

18

11

05

1015202530354045

FP1 MaximizingBenefits for

Poor Women,Children, and

Men

FP2 NovelDiversity and

Tools to Adaptto Climatic and

ResourceConstraints

FP3 GlobalBreeding

Partnerships toMeet Future

Food Demands

FP4 SustainableIntensification

of Wheat-based system

FP 5 Engagingand

strengthening

DON'T KNOW

FP mentioned in top 3 (Q8)

32

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

My home organization 73.7%

WHEAT, 24.6%

Other (please specify) 1.8%

What entity/organization do you primarily identify with? (Q10)

29

6

0

13

8

10

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

My home organization WHEAT Other (please specify)

What entity/organization do you primarily identify with? (Q10)

before 2011

after 2011

33

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

13

17

6 6

8

2

5

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

1 2 3 4 5 6 more than 7

How many different projects in WHEAT are you currently working on? (Q11)

34

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

20

17

11

8

1

0

5

10

15

20

25

I hav

e pa

rtic

ipat

ed in

des

igni

ng W

HEAT

incl

udin

g its

pro

gram

stru

ctur

e,ob

ject

ives

, mai

n th

eorie

s of c

hang

e an

dIn

term

edia

te D

evel

opm

ent o

utco

mes

(IDO

s).

I hav

e no

t par

ticip

ated

in d

esig

ning

the

WHE

AT b

ut h

ave

read

key

pro

gram

docu

men

ts a

nd k

now

the

prog

ram

stru

ctur

e, o

bjec

tives

, mai

n th

eorie

s of

chan

ge, I

DOs a

nd k

ey o

rgan

izatio

nsin

volv

ed.

I hav

e so

me

know

ledg

e of

the

prog

ram

stru

ctur

e, o

bjec

tives

, mai

n th

eorie

s of

chan

ge, I

DOs a

nd k

ey o

rgan

izatio

nsin

volv

ed.

I hav

e so

me

know

ledg

e of

the

WHE

AT,

but k

now

onl

y th

e SI

s/FP

s tha

t my

wor

kco

ntrib

utes

to.

I kno

w v

ery

little

of n

othi

ng a

bout

WHE

AT

How well do you know WHEAT? (Q13)

35

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

RESEARCH Q 14. What is your perception of the factors influencing the choice of research topics in the WHEAT Flagship you mostly contribute to?

3

0

1

1

0

1

2

4

3

1

1

4

2

1

5

7

8

3

5

12

8

9

13

11

12

11

13

14

10

20

24

20

15

13

10

7

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Expressed needs of clients or beneficiaries

Funding availability

Donor priorities

WHEAT strategy

Scientific interest/knowledge gap

Center strategy

1 - No influence at all

2

3

4

5

6 - Primary influence

36

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

Q 15. According to you, which are currently the three most important research activities within WHEAT and where you think the emphasis should be?

26

12

7

3

1

0

0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Strategic research to produce International Public Goods

Adaptive research

Local research to produce feed-back and synthesis for global…

Scaling-out of research results

“Blue sky”, high risk research

Technical assistance

Other

Current most important research activities (top rated)

32

5

4

4

3

1

0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Strategic research to produce International Public Goods

“Blue sky”, high risk research

Local research to produce feed-back and synthesis for…

Adaptive research

Scaling-out of research results

Technical assistance

Other

Where emphasis should be (top rated)

37

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

Q 16. The CRP receives funding from different sources where the Windows 1 and 2 are of least restricted type. What is your view of how W1/2 funds are used in WHEAT?

0

0

2

4

1

3

4

1

1

4

1

5

4

4

7

4

7

5

4

8

9

8

6

7

9

6

8

10

11

2

10

8

9

7

10

10

11

7

8

6

8

9

11

12

6

10

1

2

2

3

9

12

9

5

7

2

8

4

3

4

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Leverage bilateral funding

Fill gaps in research funding

Increase integration between different areas of research

Enhance desirable partnerships through competitive grants

Enhance research quality through competitive grants

Increase gender relevant research

Provide opportunities for long-term, high risk research

Provide accountability through ex post studies

Provide relevance through ex ante studies

Cover overhead costs

1- Not at all

2

3

4

5

6- Main Purpose

38

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

Q 17. In your view, how well are the following aspects for enhancing the effectiveness of WHEAT managed? Please score using a scale of 1-6 where 1=not well at all and 6=very well.

0

0

0

1

0

1

1

2

1

3

4

4

6

5

8

6

8

7

9

10

11

10

15

15

16

19

15

16

13

5

10

10

7

8

2

1

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Development of impact pathway

Engagement with partners

Annual progress monitoring

Capacity building

Analysis of target groups

Feed-back between W1/W2 and bilateral projects

1- Not well at all

2

3

4

5

6- Very well managed

39

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

Q 18. In your view, what are important pathways through which research in WHEAT aims to have impact? Please score using a scale of 1-6 where 1=not an impact pathway at all and 6=primary impact pathway.

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

2

3

2

0

3

4

5

4

5

6

6

8

6

9

12

8

12

10

14

20

17

13

16

10

31

21

17

14

12

10

12

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Influencing food security through global germplasmdevelopment

Influencing rural livelihoods through enhanced productivity

Enhancing varietal use through better seed dissemination

Enhancing environmental sustainability through improvedfarming practices

Enabling equitable benefits from research

Influencing funding of cereal research

Influencing partner research agendas in developingcountries

1-Not an impact pathway at all

2

3

4

5

6-Primary impact pathway

40

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

Q 19. In your view, how effectively are the measures listed below managed in your Center/CRP for assuring and enhancing high quality of research? Please score using a scale of 6 where 1=no attention at all and 6=very effectively.

2

1

0

0

1

2

1

3

2

2

5

2

2

4

4

4

5

4

7

5

5

9

6

9

9

9

10

9

10

9

9

10

10

8

10

15

11

10

12

19

9

13

8

13

15

14

9

6

15

12

13

6

15

10

12

8

8

6

10

8

5

7

4

6

4

5

5

6

4

5

3

2

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Infrastructure needed for high quality science

Strategic use of grants

Availability and quality of technical facilities/ equipment

Learning and knowledge management

Availability and quality of research support

Acceptance and encouragement of innovative thinking

Researcher performance assessment

Research data management

Quality assurance processes such as internal peer feed-back

Allocation of competences and appropriate skill mix to researchteams

Personal incentives for high research quality

Encouragement for learning from “ failure”

1 - No attention

2

3

4

5

6 - Very effectively

41

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

PARTNERSHIPS

20

5

5

4

3

2

2

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0 5 10 15 20 25

National research institutions

Other CGIAR centers

National governments

Universities in developing countries

Universities in developed countries

Other CRPs

Other

Farmer organizations

Civil society organizations

National agricultural extension systems

Donor implementation agencies

International NGOs

Local NGOs

Ultimate beneficiaries

Most involved partners (top rated)

42

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

0 10 20 30 40

Other CRPs

Other CGIAR centers

National governments

Universities in developing countries

Universities in developed countries

National research institutions

National agricultural extension systems

Donor implementation agencies

International NGOs

Local NGOs

Farmer organizations

Civil society organizations

Ultimate beneficiaries

Other

Top 3 most involved partners (Q21)

43

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

Q 22. In your view, to what extent do the current partnerships increase the likely effectiveness of your WHEAT-related research in areas listed below? Please score in scale of 6 where 1 -= not at all; and 6 = very much

0

1

0

1

1

3

1

2

4

4

6

5

10

7

6

9

8

12

15

17

16

12

13

10

17

16

16

16

13

13

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Help in outreach of the research results

Increase the relevance of your research

Help scale out your research results

Build on synergies which result in more streamlined researchimplementation

Increase the state-of-art in research

Help in attracting funding

1 - Not at all

2

3

4

5

6 - Very much

44

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

Q 24: In your view, to what extent are the partners in WHEAT involved in Program activities as listed below? (Please score in scale of 6 where 1 -= not at all; and 6 = very much involved)

1

3

3

3

6

6

7

8

8

6

5

5

8

9

10

15

12

13

9

12

12

11

7

8

5

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Research prioritization

Planning of projects

Publishing research result

Receiving mentoring in research

Feed-back from clients/users back to research

1- Not at all

2

3

4

5

6- Very much involved

45

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

GENDER Q 25. Please indicate your agreement with the following statements that relate to mainstreaming of gender issues in your work and WHEAT.

0

1

1

0

1

1

2

2

7

9

4

4

3

6

4

5

5

4

12

16

10

10

13

12

12

10

16

6

7

7

3

4

2

7

3

1

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Gender disaggregated data on results are collected when everappropriate.

The WHEAT gender strategy has been well communicated toteams and researchers.

The WHEAT gender strategy influences the way my team plansand conducts its work.

There is too much emphasis in gender even in research wheregender does not matter.

There is sufficient funding to implement the gender-relatedactivities

The WHEAT gender strategy influences the way most teams inthe CRP plan and conduct their work.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Somewhat disagree

Somewhat agree

Agree

Strongly Agree

46

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

Capacity development

Q 26. Please indicate your agreement your agreement with the following statements that related to capacity development (CD) in your work and WHEAT. Please score in a scale of 6 where 1=very dissatisfied and 6=very satisfied.

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

2

0

2

2

2

2

5

6

8

8

5

5

5

4

5

3

14

4

5

9

7

11

12

10

8

20

14

14

16

14

10

10

1

7

9

10

8

9

8

6

2

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

My Center is addressing institutional andorganizational CD needs in developing

countries very well,WHEAT is addressing well institutional and

organizational CD needs in developingcountries very well.

Training and mentoring are equitablytargeting men and women.

CD activities are designed so as to enhanceuptake of research results and likely

effectiveness.

CD activities are well integrated to research

My Center is addressing CD capacity needsof individuals very well.

WHEAT is addressing CD needs ofindividuals very well.

There is sufficient funding available for CDactivities

Stronglydisagree

Disagree

Somewhatdisagree

Somewhatagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

47

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

Satisfaction/value added

Q 27. Please indicate how satisfied you are with the following working conditions for your work. Please score in a scale of 6 where 1=very dissatisfied and 6=very

0

0

0

0

2

1

2

0

6

3

2

6

7

6

7

3

9

7

9

8

9

12

10

11

14

12

9

7

14

12

9

11

10

8

10

8

14

13

10

10

7

12

9

7

7

4

3

4

3

5

1

2

1

0

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%100%

Share of time required for training andmentoring

Share of time required for coordinating amongpartners

Share of time required for travel and meetings(whether for Center or CRP)

Incentives for cooperating with non-CGIARpartners

Share of time allocated to research (compared totime for administration and reporting; whether…

Reliability and predictability of bilateral projectfunding

Incentives for working across themes anddisciplines in the CRP

Incentives for cooperating with other CGIARCenters or CRPs

Reliability and predictability of CGIAR fundingthrough Window1/Window2

1- Very dissatisfied

2

3

4

5

6 - Very satisfied

48

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

Q 28. Please indicate your agreement with the following statements related to the value WHEAT has had or is likely to have influencing the success of your research compared to past Center-based implementation of the research. Please score in a scale of 6 where 1=very dissatisfied and 6=very satisfied.

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

2

1

1

1

0

1

2

3

1

2

5

2

1

6

6

10

9

8

7

11

8

11

10

9

11

9

8

8

11

12

8

7

13

12

9

11

11

18

17

15

17

12

13

14

13

9

14

9

7

4

3

7

4

3

2

5

1

3

2

0

1

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

WHEAT is enabling research to be better aligned to beneficiary needs.

The results framework in WHEAT will improve the value-added fromresearch.

Research is becoming strategically better focused on developmentoutcomes.

WHEAT provides a better framework for guiding and focusingresearch planning.

Due to WHEAT, capacity development is now addressed morestrategically to improve research effectiveness

WHEAT has improved the way in which gender issues are integratedto research

My research is better rationalized in the broader context of programobjectives.

WHEAT encourages accountability for development outcomes (notjust research outputs)

WHEAT is creating or enhancing synergies between participatingCenters.

Research is becoming better integrated across disciplines and teamstowards results.

WHEAT has good potential to help streamline administrativeprocedures

WHEAT has good potential to help streamline monitoring andreporting

1 - Very dissatisfied

2

3

4

5

6 - Very satisfied

49

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

ANNEX G. - Sample project assessment - TEMPLATE PROJECT NUMBER: (if applicable) PROJECT TITLE: FLAGSHIP PROJECT NUMBER: TYPE OF PROJECT: RESEARCH more downstream DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED – please explain briefly LEAD: CIMMYT/ICARDA/other Filled out by: Date: Documentation used for assessment: RELEVANCE AND COHERENCE: Alignment with WHEAT objectives Project alignment means that project objectives and activities to achieve those objectives are clearly defined and match with those of the SI/FP

• Is the project presented as part of WHEAT CRP?

• To what extent is the project/activity aligned to the FP (or specific SI) objectives and WHEAT IDOs? - Very well - Moderately - Poorly

Comments:

1. Relevance of project

• Are the main target beneficiaries of the project clearly defined?

50

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

• Does the project reflect needs and priorities of target group?

• Does the project address globally/regionally important issues where CGIAR has comparative advantage?

2. SCIENCE QUALITY

• Is the research addressing researchable issues?

3. • Are research hypothesis clearly formulated and testable?

4. • Does the project use state of the art methodology?

5.

6. To what extent do the choices of research topics and research designs reflect a high quality of scientific thinking, state-of-the-art knowledge of the scientific literature and complements research done elsewhere?

7. • To what extent does the research reflect an iterative process between downstream and upstream research? Has feedback from

downstream work been incorporated in research design?

LIKELY EFFECTIVENESS:

• Is there an impact pathway described and is it realistic?

51

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

8. • How has progress been in terms of research results and outputs?

9. • Are limitations and delays explained?

10. • How does the project design address the scaling-up and out of research outputs?

11. • Does the project include an implementation modality (partnerships, management) which reflects an appropriate role for CIMMYT/IITA?

12. • What has been the main success so far? (MENTION ONE MAJOR ACHIEVEMENT) Assess its significance.

13. Are constraints to research outputs as well as uptake/impact and challenges mentioned and addressed?

14. • Is the reference to when impact (adoption) is expected and in what scale? How likely do you see this realizing?

PARTNERSHIPS

• What types of partners are included in the project?

• Are the partners’ roles clearly defined?

15. • How is the work divided between CIMMYT/ICARDA and the partners?

52

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

• To what extent are these partners relevant and likely effective in relation to the project's objectives and design -- at the project's

conceptual stage? - High - Substantial - Modest - Low - Not mentioned

GENDER

16. • Does the project/research strategy address gender specific issues?

17. • Does the project report on gender disaggregated results?

• From the point of view of achieving the objectives of the project, has there been an under-emphasis, appropriate emphasis, or over-

emphasis on gender analysis and gender-specific research in terms of achieving the Flagship IDO? - Under-emphasis - Appropriate emphasis - Over-emphasis - Not mentioned

CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

18.

53

iea.cgiar.org

Wheat Evaluation

• Are there any capacity building measures mentioned and who do they target?

• What capacity building activities have been implemented?

• From the point of view of achieving the objectives of the project, has there been an under-emphasis, appropriate emphasis, or over-emphasis on capacity development in terms of achieving the Flagship IDO?

- Under-emphasis - Appropriate emphasis - Over-emphasis - Not mentioned

CONCLUSION/OBSERVATIONS please briefly explain any qualifiers to the above questions (issues that could not be reflected) as well as briefly state the main strengths as well as issues relating to this project

54

Wheat Evaluation

ANNEX H. - Peer review scoring of a random sample of publications – TEMPLATE

Number of publication (according to our list and file name): Name of publication: Journal name: Center: CIMMYT/ICARDA Area: Agronomy/Breeding/Socio econ Team member to review publication Team members shall assess each publication according to the following standardized criteria and approach: Criterion Assessment approach methodological rigor and coherence of data analysis

Scale1

comprehensiveness of research narrative Scale innovativeness; novelty Observation: would novelty be expected, if yes

what kind of novelty was observed quality (and appropriateness) of publication venue

Observation of low-quality or inappropriate venue relative to subject and quality of paper

collaboration (especially co-authorship) evident Observation of extent of authorship and with whom

“fit” with CRP objectives Observation of outliers overall quality of publication (including additional criteria at evaluator discretion)

Brief narrative

19. When there are other outputs than published work – such as germplasm - systematic assessment of quality may be difficult and assessment of quality can be based on project reports, volume of output, extent of use/uptake and user perceptions.

1 Scale of 4 (1=poor; 2=mediocre; 3=good; 4=excellent) or 6 (1=poor; 2=quite poor; 3=adequate; 4=quite good; 5=good; 6=excellent). Eventually evaluation findings should not have too many scales.

ANNEX A. - Evaluation Team Members – Short BiosANNEX B. - Country visitsANNEX C. - List of people metANNEX D. - List of sample projectsANNEX E. - Assessment of publicationsANNEX F. - WHEAT researcher surveyANNEX G. - Sample project assessment - TEMPLATEANNEX H. - Peer review scoring of a random sample of publications – TEMPLATE