Upload
elleiram-arellano
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/4/2019 Evaluation of Expert Teachers And
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluation-of-expert-teachers-and 1/9
EVALUATION OF EXPERT
TEACHERS AND
EVALUATION SYSTEM
Reporter: Marielle Grace S. Arellano
8/4/2019 Evaluation of Expert Teachers And
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluation-of-expert-teachers-and 2/9
EVALUATION OF EXPERT
TEACHERS
In order to reward and motivate teaching excellence, Cangelosi
(1991) suggests summative evaluations based on cost-effective
measurements to serve as bases for designing merit-pay
programs (based on levels of productivity), and career ladder
programs (schemes to enhance teachers’ opportunities for
promotions). The success of these strategies depends on how
well the evaluation instruments discriminate meritorious,
excellent instruction from a teaching performance that is merely
competent.
8/4/2019 Evaluation of Expert Teachers And
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluation-of-expert-teachers-and 3/9
EVALUATION OF EXPERT
TEACHERS • Summative evaluations for expert teachers are
designed to identify exemplary meritoriousinstruction. This presupposes that they areproperly identified and screened. They can be
recognized through:• Consistent high summative evaluations ratings
on classroom performance over a period of 3 years
• Endorsement from peers (colleagues and
professional groups)• Fulfillment of higher level credentials (i.e.,
graduate programs) • Scholarly work (research and publications).
8/4/2019 Evaluation of Expert Teachers And
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluation-of-expert-teachers-and 4/9
EVALUATION SYSTEM The choice of criteria is usually guided by the
mission-vision of the school, as well as accepted
concepts and principles found in the literature.
As a rule, the evaluation system implemented in
a school is clearly defined in faculty and
administrative manuals.
8/4/2019 Evaluation of Expert Teachers And
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluation-of-expert-teachers-and 5/9
EVALUATION SYSTEM Evaluation systems include specific elements such as:
Rationale – explains the nature, objectives and
benefits to be derived from the evaluation systemAreas of evaluation – identify the different
dimensions to be assessed in addition to classroomteaching such as efforts exerted towardsprofessional growth, demonstration of ethical
conduct, community involvement and otherindicators of what may be considered as “going theextra mile”
8/4/2019 Evaluation of Expert Teachers And
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluation-of-expert-teachers-and 6/9
EVALUATION SYSTEM The evaluation procedure specifies the
following:The data-gathering process (including the
instruments to be used)
The feedback mechanism
The needed documents to be submitted to support
claims about accomplishments and achievements.
8/4/2019 Evaluation of Expert Teachers And
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluation-of-expert-teachers-and 7/9
EVALUATION SYSTEM The schedule and frequency of the evaluation
The identification of the evaluators (i.e.principal, assistant principal, subject area
coordinator)
It also explains the way the different criteriawill be assessed and the weight apportionedfor each criterion
8/4/2019 Evaluation of Expert Teachers And
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluation-of-expert-teachers-and 8/9
OVERALL FACULTY EVALUATION
FORM
8/4/2019 Evaluation of Expert Teachers And
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluation-of-expert-teachers-and 9/9
AN EXAMPLE OF
ASSIGNING WEIGHTS