Upload
kayla-hood
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
European Cooperative Network for European Cooperative Network for Research, Diagnosis and Therapy of Parkinson´s DiseaseResearch, Diagnosis and Therapy of Parkinson´s Disease
EuroPa Plenary EuroPa Plenary MeetingMeeting
WORK PACKAGE 3WORK PACKAGE 3 - Patient Registry -- Patient Registry -
- MAIN TASKS -- MAIN TASKS -
√√ Establishment of an european Registry of Parkinson´s Establishment of an european Registry of Parkinson´s Disease patientsDisease patients
√√ Development of the Minimal Data Set (MDS) and Development of the Minimal Data Set (MDS) and Sampling Procedure for patient recruitmentSampling Procedure for patient recruitment
√√ Participation in the database development and test-runParticipation in the database development and test-run
√ Keep track of the weekly entry rate and follow up visitsKeep track of the weekly entry rate and follow up visits
√ Quality control of medical data entryQuality control of medical data entry
-- MILESTONES -MILESTONES -
Time Due
(months)
Completed milestones
Ongoing
milestones
1st period
Start of data entry
18 √√
2 nd period
First 1000 patients
30 √√
First 4000 patients
36 √√
- DELIVERABLES -- DELIVERABLES -MONTHMONTH NATURENATURE CURRENT STATUSCURRENT STATUS
1 1 stst meeting of the meeting of the Registry groupRegistry group
22 OtherOther CC meeting 01/02CC meeting 01/02
Registry policyRegistry policy 66 OtherOther Discussed at SC meeting 07/02Discussed at SC meeting 07/02
Discussed at SC meeting 07/03Discussed at SC meeting 07/03
Approved 08/03Approved 08/03
Minimal Data SetMinimal Data Set 1212 PublicPublic Finalized 12/03Finalized 12/03
Updated 09/03Updated 09/03
2 2 nd nd meeting of the meeting of the Registry groupRegistry group
1818 OtherOther Conference call 06/03Conference call 06/03
Functioning user´s-Functioning user´s-interfaceinterface
1818 OtherOther Available since 05/03Available since 05/03
- CENTER STATUS -- CENTER STATUS - Actively
recruitingWeb
data
entry
Ethical Committee approval
Data Protection approval
Follow up visits on going
Marburg √√ √√ √√ √√ √√
London √√ √√ √√ √√ √√
Groningen √√ √√ no no no
Innsbruck √√ √√ √√ √√ √√
Barcelona √√ √√ √√ √√ no
Lisbon √√ √√ √√ √√ no
Toulouse √√ √√ not needed √√ no
Tel Aviv √√ √√ not needed √√ no
Naples √√ √√ √√ √√ no
Prague √√ √√ √√ no no
Lund not active not active not active not active not active
- REGISTRY ENTRY OVER TIME -- REGISTRY ENTRY OVER TIME -
planned
obtained
Milestones (months)Milestones (months)
PatientsPatients
0 18 30 34 36
4000
3000
2000
1000
500 397397
1610161017761776
- BREAKDOWN OF CENTRES- BREAKDOWN OF CENTRES --
N=1776N=1776
Innsbruck(277)
Marburg(237)
Naples(211)
London(205)
Toulouse(183)
Prague(185)
Barcelona(123)
Lisbon(116)
Groningen(119)
Tel Aviv(120)
- RANDOM SAMPLE -- RANDOM SAMPLE -
N= 1447N= 1447
Innsbruck(232)
Marburg(127)
Naples(117)
London(184)
Toulouse(182)
Prague(165)
Barcelona(122)
Lisbon(107)
Groningen(116)
Tel Aviv(95)
- FIRST DATABASE QUERY -- FIRST DATABASE QUERY -
√√ Test the functionality of the Recruitment ToolTest the functionality of the Recruitment Tool
√√ Check-up of the completeness of all FormsCheck-up of the completeness of all Forms
√√ Comparability of the results among centresComparability of the results among centres
√√ Medical data quality controlMedical data quality control
√√ Contribution to the future exploitation of the RegistryContribution to the future exploitation of the Registry
OBJECTIVESOBJECTIVES
- QUERY PATIENTS -- QUERY PATIENTS -
216
179
247
99 MarburgMarburg
GroningenGroningen
LondonLondon
InnsbruckInnsbruck
- HOEHN & YAHR -- HOEHN & YAHR -
H&Y
1 – 1,5
H&Y
2 – 2,5
H&Y
3 - 4
H&Y
5
Marburg 34 (15%)
40 (18%)
60 (27%)
41 (18%)
22 (10%)
13 (6%)
6 (2%)
London 9 (5%)
14 (7%)
14 (7%)
31 (17%)
65 (36%)
20 (11%)
2 (1%)
Innsbruck 25 (10%)
2 (0,8%)
96 (38%)
39 (15%)
61 (24%)
22 (8%)
2 (0,8%)
Groningen 7 (7%)
10 (10%)
36 (36%)
24 (24%)
16 (16%)
6 (6%)
0 (0%)
-- DEMENTIA - PSYCHOSIS DEMENTIA - PSYCHOSIS DEPRESSIONDEPRESSION - -
DEMENTIA PSYCHOSIS DEPRESSION
Marburg 5 (2%) 22 (10%) 15 (7%)
London 26 (14%) 40 (22%) 17 (9%)
Innsbruck 35 (14%) 32 (13%) 74 (29%)
Groningen 20 (20%) 8 (8%) 19 (19%)
- PAIN - SLEEP DISORDERS -- PAIN - SLEEP DISORDERS -
PAINPAIN SLEEP SLEEP DISORDERSDISORDERS
Marburg 31 (14 %) 70 (32%)
London 91 (50%) 128 (71%)
Innsbruck 114 (46%) 179 (72%)
Groningen 24 (24%) 66 (66%)
- PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS -- PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS -
√ Marked heterogeneity of clinical features among centres
* Selection bias
* Geographical differences
* „Interrater reliability“
- WP3 PROPOSALS -- WP3 PROPOSALS -
√ Check the validity of the databaseCheck the validity of the database
√√ Implement the export tool Implement the export tool
√√ Define protocols for common database queriesDefine protocols for common database queries