Upload
sorena
View
56
Download
9
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Eta Distributions. Eta Ratio (ITTF/TPT). Pt Distribution. Pt Ratio (ITTF/TPT). East & West vs run number. Looking at log files. For some events No tracks are found on the east Next event, no tracks are found on the west… For the same event, numbers are comparable:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
ITTF “Re-View” Session,August 11, 2003
Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez
ITTF Evaluation for Spectra
ITTF Evaluation for Spectra
2
Eta Distributions
3
Eta Ratio (ITTF/TPT)
4
Pt Distribution
5
Pt Ratio (ITTF/TPT)
6
East & West vs run number
7
Looking at log files For some events
No tracks are found on the eastNext event, no tracks are found on the west…For the same event, numbers are comparable:
TPT ITTF
Good globals 1212 1353
H+ East 136 132
H- East 158 148
H+ west 96 0
H- west 87 0
Next event has nothing in the west… then maybeagain in the east… Has to be a bug!
8
Hit and Tracking Data set used:
Hijing b<3 simulations Usually, absolute value of efficiency is too
ideal … comparisons between current code & IT
From loose to tight cutsLook at midrapidity (|eta|<0.5) mainlyAccepted MC tracks == 10 MC Hits at leastReconstructed track cuts:
Fit Points >= 10, no dca cut (3 cm for primaries)
Fit Points >= 24, dca < 1cm
9
Fit Points, Then and Now
Cuts:Central HijingGlobal dca<1,Fit Pts>=10
Integral normalized to 1
10
What’s the deal? Efficiency vs pT
Here, efficiency is:
Found & MatchedMC Accepted
June Review Aug. 6 Production
“Loose cut” data set
Tuning effort by our Wayne guys!! Note: some CVS glitch probably happened, as I’ve seen better numbers (Andrew).
11
…tighter dca and tighter fit points
Cuts like thoseused in identifiedspectra papers
June Review Aug. 6 Production
12
Efficiency vs eta, tight cuts
Cuts like thoseused in identifiedspectra papers
Asymmetry, wasn’tthere before…
13
Eta efficiency, loose cuts
Zbigniew sees thesame with loose cuts.
14
What’s happening? Distribution
Need to mask sectors properly
15
Efficiency and Bias
Again:Current best tune was not used for this production.
From Zbigniew,Bias and pullswere better before.Note scale.
16
pt Resolution
17
Curvature and tan() pulls.
18
Snapshot
Proper tuning of tracking parameters has led to improvements (Andrew). Efficiency improved
The best tune was not used for the Hijing production
Masking of sectors needs to be addressed No hardcoding of time-stamps (integration into BFC).
Energy loss calculation needs to be debugged for final tuning of bias.
Must have a consistent parameter set for the production that we all use. Need to finalize and commit BEST parameter set to the
library, which gives the performance we always advertised.