Upload
barbara-lloyd
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ErtmerThe
E T E C / 6 0 0T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
E d u c a t i o n a l Te c h n o l o g y
A d a m H a l e m a n oK a s e y F e r n a n d e z
M i a B e a t t y
C a s e S t u d y
ErtmerThe E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Label EvaluateIdentify
Identify
Identify Characteristics Thompson Run Elementary school seems to be a great place to work.
The school has consistently met the testing requirements for state
standards and the principal.
Shannon Ensman, is an enthusiastic new hire with a background as
assistant principal at a school with a strong emphasis in hands on
experiences and technology integration.
Shannon has been with the school for one year and would like to
implement some positive changes to the curriculum and teacher practices
in her second year.
Thomas Run Elementary is equipped with the supplies and technology
needed to incorporate hands on experiences and technology integration
into the daily curriculum.
NextPrevious
Outline Rationale
C a s e S t u d y
Identify
Identify
Label EvaluateIdentify
Identify NextPrevious
Outline Rationale
E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Identify Characteristics (Continued) Recently, Shannon has hired Carla Fox to help jump start her vision of a
forward thinking, hands on, technology based school.
Carla is willing and able to teach others and is considered to be a master
teacher and recognized as "County Teacher of the Year" and "Innovative
Instructor for Region 10".
Carla graduated from a rigorous 5 year integration based teaching program
with a specialization in educational technology and received a master's
degree in instructional design.
Many of the teachers have a hard time accepting Shannon’s enforcement of
training in “innovative teaching practices.”
ErtmerThe C a s e S t u d y
Identify
Label Evaluate Outline RationaleIdentify
Identify
E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Identify Characteristics (Continued) To introduce and discuss the training Shannon called for an initial school
wide staff meeting.
Mrs. Hodge, Mr. Schlegelmilch and other teachers do not see the need for
reform because their school consistently "meets" standardized tests.
Mrs. Hodge also states that they have tried similar university innovations
before and test scores did not improve and classrooms seemed to be more
chaotic during the trial period.
Mr. Puskorious, a new teacher, wanted to improve but wanted further
training in classroom management strategies before learning/ worrying
about technology integration.
NextPrevious
ErtmerThe C a s e S t u d y
Identify
Label Evaluate Outline RationaleIdentify
Identify
E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Identify Characteristics (Continued) Mr. Zurovachak, a veteran teacher, is very supportive of the new training
and looks forward to being part of the new Principal's innovative vision.
First year teacher Mr. Fitzgerald is also very enthusiastic about the training
and would love to have the time to collaborate with his fellow teachers.
Mrs. Hodge’s negative attitude seemed to pervade the discussion,
preventing others from sharing their opinion.
Other teachers emailed Shannon (such as Mrs. Lynn) to give their support.
Carla was already collaborating with Mrs. Lynn so she could potentially help
Carla recruit other teachers.
Another issue with the proposed training is that teachers would not be
compensated.
NextPrevious
ErtmerThe C a s e S t u d y
Identify
Label Evaluate Outline RationaleIdentify
Identify NextPrevious
E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Identify Characteristics (Continued) Some teachers are unwilling to put time and effort into the training
because much of their time is devoted to their classes to begin with.
Carla is being asked to take on 2 roles although she is only paid for one.
As a teacher, Carla is expected to model new teaching approaches and
become a model for other teachers.
As an instructional designer, Carla is expected to lead efforts to identify,
plan for, and implement the necessary changes embodied in Shannon's
visions for the school .
ErtmerThe C a s e S t u d y
Label
Label
Label Evaluate Outline RationaleIdentify
NextPrevious
E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Label Players in the Scenario
Opinion Leaders
The protagonist of this narrative, Carla Fox, is a highly regarded and well
reputed educator with a fair number of public accolades under her belt.
The school’s principal, Shannon Ensman, is a progressive minded innovator
with strong commitment toward the exploration and promotion of change
within the context of learning strategies and interdisciplinary approaches.
Followers of Change
Mr. Fitzgerald is a recent graduate and first year educator.
Mrs. Lynn is a quiet and reserved educator.
Mr. Zurovachak is a well-respected veteran educator.
ErtmerThe C a s e S t u d y
Label
Label
Label Evaluate Outline RationaleIdentify
Resistance of Change
Mrs. Hodge is an outspoken veteran educator with a known aversion for
change.
Mr. Schlegelmilch is an educator seeking compensatory payment for
additional work tasks that must be done in order to bring about change.
Mr. Puskorious is another novice educator with self-confessed classroom
management issues. He feels that additional classroom support is needed.
Due to personal concerns regarding the prevailing workload and arduous
teaching environments, Mr. Schlegelmilch and Mr. Puskorious have
tentatively sided with Mrs. Hodge in her staunch stance against the
proposed revisited reform agenda.
NextPrevious
E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Label Players in the Scenario
ErtmerThe C a s e S t u d y
Evalu
ate
Evaluate
Label Evaluate Outline RationaleIdentify
E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Evaluate Makeup of the Ad Hoc Committee The ad hoc committee at Thompson Run Elementary consists of Carla, a master
teacher who is a well reputable educator with a background in instructional
design.
Mrs. Lynn is a reserved but innovative classroom teacher whom Carla Fox
collaborates with and Mr. Zurovachak, is a veteran teacher.
The three ad hoc committee members are all in favor of school-wide changes.
Mr. Fitzgerald, a new teacher who seems eager to share his knowledge, and an
opposed teacher such as Mrs. Hodge or Mr. Schlegelmich.
We feel the opposed teacher can gain and contribute to the committee as
much as the other members, and if she or he can change their views about the
school-wide reform, they may be able to persuade other opposed teachers.
ErtmerThe C a s e S t u d y
Outlin
e
Outline
Label Evaluate Outline Rationale
NextPrevious
Identify
E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Outline for Initial Committee Meeting
1. Plan for Meeting 1Introduction (5 minutes) total.
a. Welcome all.b. Brief Introduction of Main Objective.
2. Ice Breaker (15 minutes) total.a. ???
3. Focus on Integrating Hands On Experiences (1 hour 15 minutes) totala. Research proving the benefits of incorporating hands on experiences
(5 minutes).b. Connections with Common Core standards (10 minutes).c. Examples of lessons plan ideas throughout all areas (10 minutes).
Main Objective: To inspire teachers to enthusiastically incorporate new teaching practices into their class curriculum.
ErtmerThe C a s e S t u d y
Outlin
e
Outline
Label Evaluate Outline RationaleIdentify
E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Outline for Initial Committee Meeting (Continued)
d. Activity: Brief lesson example (25 minutes).
i. Group 1 Focus: Language Arts 1. Activity: Make a book? Reader’s Theatre?
ii. Group 2 Focus: Science1. Activity: Experiment: ?
iii. Group 3 Focus: Social Studies1. Activity: Role Play?
iv. Group 4 Focus: Math1. Activity: Something using Manipulative?
v. Group 5 Focus: Health1. Activity: Spreading germs glitter game?
Main Objective: To inspire teachers to enthusiastically incorporate new teaching practices into their class curriculum.
NextPrevious
ErtmerThe C a s e S t u d y
Outlin
e
Outline
Label Evaluate Outline RationaleIdentify
E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Outline for Initial Committee Meeting (Continued)
e. Reflection i. Group Sharing (10 minutes).ii. Discussion (10 minutes).iii. Survey (5 minutes).
4. Break Time (15 minutes) total.a. Snacks
5. Focus on Integrating Educational Technology (60 minutes) total b. Research proving the benefits of incorporating technology (5 minutes).c. Connections with Common Core Standards (5 minutes).
Main Objective: To inspire teachers to enthusiastically incorporate new teaching practices into their class curriculum.
NextPrevious
ErtmerThe C a s e S t u d y
Outlin
e
Outline
Label Evaluate Outline RationaleIdentify
E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Outline for Initial Committee Meeting (Continued)
c. Overview of different technology resources available at the school (5 minutes).
d. Examples of lessons plan ideas throughout all areas (10 minutes).e. Activity: Brief interactive lesson example utilizing one of the technologies
(perhaps a SMART board game) (20 minutes).i. Group 1 Focus: Language Arts ii. Group 2 Focus: Scienceiii. Group 3 Focus: Social Studiesiv. Group 4 Focus: Math
f. Reflection i. Discussion (10 minutes).ii. Survey (5 minutes).
Main Objective: To inspire teachers to enthusiastically incorporate new teaching practices into their class curriculum.
NextPrevious
ErtmerThe C a s e S t u d y
Outlin
e
Outline
Label Evaluate Outline RationaleIdentify
E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Outline for Initial Committee Meeting (Continued)
6. Conclusion (40 minutes) total.a. Recap meeting (10 minutes).b. Discussion: did we achieve our objective? (5 minutes).c. Circle Time (20 minutes).
i. Everyone shares 1 sentence about what they like/ don’t like about the meeting and proposed training.
ii. Pass around a special item such as a talking stick. iii. One speaker at a time, one sentence only.
d. Thanks you and Good-byes (5 minutes).
Total Time: 3 ½ hours
Main Objective: To inspire teachers to enthusiastically incorporate new teaching practices into their class curriculum.
NextPrevious
ErtmerThe C a s e S t u d y
Ratio
nale
Rationale
Label Evaluate Outline Rationale
NextPrevious
Identify
E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Rationale of Committee Meeting Outline The focus of our meeting is not only professional development, but also
community development.
We believe that the success of the training depends on the livelihood of the
learning community and we would like to foster that by incorporating
experiences that will require the teachers to work together in groups.
After training, teachers hopefully begin to implement these strategies used,
they can share out ideas, what worked or didn't, problems, etc. during PLC's
(Professional Learning Committees) in their grade levels.
The meeting will include an ice breaker, snack time and activity examples.
Ideally, we would have at least ½ of a professional development day to
devote to the cause, but could shorten the training or divide it into two
meetings that are 1 ½ hours each.
ErtmerThe C a s e S t u d y
Rationale
Label Evaluate Outline RationaleIdentify
NextPrevious
E T E C / 6 0 0 T h e o r y & P r a c t i c e
Ratio
nale
Rationale of Committee Meeting Outline (Continued)
We hope to engage the teachers just as we hope them to engage their
students in the classroom.
The hands on and interactive activities facilitated will hopefully make
teachers excited to bring them into their own curriculum.
We will provide an array of ideas for each subject area that we will
expand upon in future meetings.
Enthusiastic teachers will be encouraged to plan a simple sample
activity for subsequent meetings or to share in other ways.
Sharing will further the success of the learning community so we would
like to give teachers to share as much as possible as often run out of
time to do this on a daily basis.
ErtmerThe C a s e S t u d y