Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
II. FY15 Contract Attachment D2 Institution: Brookdale Community College
EOF Program Mission Statement
The mission of the Educational Opportunity Fund program at Brookdale Community College is
to recruit, enroll, and promote the college readiness and success of low-income first
generation students, representative of the demographic diversity of Monmouth County, and
determined to be under-prepared for college study.
The program, in partnership with the institution, is to provide a comprehensive array of
student support services designed to foster student learning and development and minimize
the financial burden of college attendance. These services include a summer bridge program,
skill assessments, remedial/developmental instruction, the monitoring of student academic
progress, advisement/counseling, career development, learning assistance, student leadership development, and financial support.
As a result of participation in these services, program students are to be prepared for
certificate/degree completion, transfer to four year colleges, workforce entry, and making
contributions to their communities in demonstrating responsible citizenship.
Goals & Objectives
Assessment of key program level and student learning outcomes is to provide evidence which
may be used to make decisions to improve services and activities; enhance student learning
and development; and inform planning, budgeting, policy, and accountability.
Operational components, services and activities reported on are:
Recruitment, Admission, and Enrollment
Summer Bridge Program
Advisement & Counseling
Financial Literacy Education Learning Assistance- Math Focus
Student Success Event Programming
Student Leadership Development
Project Excel: Probationary Student Interventions
Curricular Options as Student Supports
Communications Management and Learning Technology
Program Assessment Using Dashboard Indicators
____________________________________________________________________
Page 7
Brookdale Vision
Brookdale, the County College of Monmouth, is a dynamic community college system committed to student success, lifelong learning, economic development and the common good of society. Brookdale Community College plays a transformative role in our community, providing educational, cultural and professional programs and offerings to enable, empower and inspire community members to achieve their aspirations to the best of their abilities.
Brookdale Mission Brookdale Community College provides a comprehensive array of quality, affordable educational choices leading to transfer and career opportunities, certificates and associate degrees, access to post- associate learning, lifelong learning, and community development. Brookdale is an open-access, future- oriented institution committed to student success and development in a socially diverse environment.
Introduction
This section of the Annual Report Narrative visits each D2 goal in context of its objectives, its assessment method, and criteria for success.
Notations are made on the extent to which areas were addressed, Fully Met, Partially Met, Not Met; outcomes where applicable reported on, and
brief explanations where applicable provided.
There continues to be much work to do to realize the full potential of the FY15 major goals and objectives
developed and which are to lead in part to strengthening Brookdale EOF program’s ability to best serve its
mission. It is also important to acknowledge the D2 goals and objectives reported on only partially represent
the work of the program, its staff, our college partners, and our students. There is more to our program and
our accomplishments than what is associated with the progress towards meeting our FY15 D2 goals- and our
staff, college partners, and our students continue to demonstrate a desire to move our program forward.
The intention is to continue to pursue our FY15 D2 goals and most are relisted in our FY16 D2- and some have
been modified to reflect a different approach to process with little change to sought-after outcomes. This past
year we were not fully staffed for 6 months out of the year; there were transitional hurdles to contend with on
matters of staff taking on assignment to non-EOF initiatives, and new staff assigned to the EOF program
contended with assignments of significant challenge to them. Continuity of effort suffered under these
conditions.
New Student Programming Initiative of the Year
Student Leadership Development, Goal G, Page 16
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 8
FY15 D2 Major Goals and Objectives
Major Program Goals & Objectives
Assessment Method &
Criteria for Success
Outcomes
A. Recruitment, Admissions, & Enrollment
AUO Goal 1: By the end of June, 2015 admit a
population of EOF Fall 2015 FTFT prospects that
is diverse in entering demographics and
learning needs, and which is in compliance with
meeting both financial and academic eligibility
requirements prescribed under administrative
regulations governing the operation of the
program
Key Objective (s):
Objective 1: Maintain the high school market
as the primary source for student enrollment
and continue to utilize the HS on-site
admission program as the main feeder
mechanism- Objective Fully Met: 17 high
schools worked with
Objective 2: Target GED and high school
equivalency recipients as a secondary source
of enrollment and replicate with modifications
the on-site admission program- Objective Not
Met: Retirement of BCC Administrative Liaison
& transitional issues placed this on hold
Assessment Method
Utilize an Applicant Tracking
System to monitor student flow and
outcomes through the
recruitment, admission and
enrollment process
Criteria for Success
Provide conditional admission to
210 students and in finalizing
admission realize a yield of 125
admits by end of June, 2015
A. Composition: Recruitment Source
-85% or 106 high school
enrolled students
-15% or 19 students with GED/
high school equivalency diploma,
and/or high-risk from alternative
educational settings
Assessment Method: Fully Met
Applicant tracking system maintained
Criteria for Success: Partially Met
Realized yield of 135 admits by end of June, 2015
A. Composition: Recruitment Source, Partially
Met
-100% high school enrolled consisted of 125 admits
-No GED pool
Winston Churchill
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 9
Objective 3:Establish a community organization and
alternative educational outreach effort to identify
high-risk students for possible admission- Objective
Not Met: EOF support staffing vacancies did not
allow this initiative to be launched
0bjective 4: Maintain an admission design which
includes program application completion, review of
high school records to include meeting of GPA cut
scores, upon availability review of HSPA scores, use
of GED cut scores, use of basic skill placement
scores, and conducting of admission interviews
where needed- Objective Partially Met- GED focus
on hold
AUO Goal 2: Maintain an annual enrollment of EOF
grant recipients which includes fall
first-time, full-time first -year (initials ) and
continuing (renewal) EOF students that can be
supported with the FY 2015 EOF Article III
allocation
Key Objective (s)
Objective 1: Provide support services to assist
students with Brookdale and state aid processing and
monitor each using available information systems-
Objective Partially Met: EOF staffing vacancies
reduced service availability
Objective 2: Assess EOF grant disbursements on a
periodic basis, to include impact of ineligible renewal
students, full-time to part-time conversion, and
student term to term attrition, and address closing
available balances in the allocation- Objective
Partially Met: focus shifted to trying to address
other program needs based on vacancies and new
staff transitional challenges, resulting in less time
given to closing new student enrollment gaps
B. Composition: Residence, District
Factor A/B & High Distress/Labor
Surplus Designated
- Minimum 55% from Asbury Park, Long
Branch, Neptune, Keansburg,
Keyport, Highlands, and Freehold
C. Composition: Basic Skill Needs
-No need: 10%- One Area:25%
-Two Areas: 25%- Three Areas: 40%
To be measured by assessing the
EOF grant awarded enrollment using
the on-line supplemental roster and
internal reports
Criteria for Success
Provide EOF grants to minimum 375
students of which 120 are first-time,
full-time freshmen (initials), 55 are
BCC enrolled with prior college
history, and 200 are continuing
(renewal) students
B. Composition: Residence, District Factor A/B
& High Distress/Labor Surplus Designated, Partially
Met
- Minimum 55% not met; 50% yield for Asbury Park,
Long Branch, Neptune, Keansburg, Keyport,
Highland, and Freehold C. Composition: Basic Skill Needs- Fully Met
-No Need: 14%, One Area: 22%, Two Areas: 23% Three Areas: 35% Stronger profile evident in
comparison to projected entering basic skills needs
Utilized on-line roster and internal reports as
planned- Fully Met
Criteria for Success, Partially Met
Funded 315 students, 51 fall 14 FTFT, 46 BCC
enrolled with prior college history, and over 200
continuing (renewal students)- FTFT enrollment
impacted by number not meeting summer bridge
program participation requirements, and lack of
full staff (vacancies) to work with students on
financial aid processing matters.
Arnold H. Glasow
______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 10
Pablo Picasso
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11
Major Program Goals & Objectives
B. Summer Bridge Program
AUO Goal: Strengthen the college readiness of
first year students enrolled in the summer 2014
bridge program in preparation for their first
year of college enrollment
Key Objective (s):
Objective 1: Provide basic skill remediation
across reading, writing and math areas to
accelerate upward change of placement
entering the fall 14 semester- Objective
Partially Met: Curriculum provided but
projected upward movement in placements
not reached
Objective 2: Introduce students to learning
strategies, the career development process,
financial literacy concepts and strategies,
and college resources- Objective Met:
Curriculum delivered
Objective 3: Engage students in activities
which promote community-building and the
exercising of social responsibility- Objective
Partially Met: Project availability was limited
Objective 4: Assist students with completing
all financial aid processing requirements-
Objective Partially Met: Staffing resource
issue
Assessment Method & Criteria for Success
Assessment Method
To be measured by program
completion rates, class completion
rates, changes in fall 14 basic skill
placements, completion of Financial
Literacy 101 and FOCUS2 web-based
e-learning material, assessing
service project student participation
levels, examination of student
financial aid packages, summer
bridge student survey, and fall 14
full-time enrollment
Criteria for Success
-minimum 85% of students
recommended for continued
program enrollment,
-minimum 90% meeting passing
requirements for assigned classes,
-minimum 65% of students moving
up least one course level,
-minimum 85% completion of web-
based financial literacy and FOCUS2
material,
-90% student volunteer participation
rate for individual service projects,
-minimum 80% of student aid
packages complete
Outcomes
Assessment Method, Fully Met
All assessment processes were carried out.
Criteria For Success: Partially Met
-80% recommended for continued program
enrollment
-88% met passing requirements for assigned
classes,
-49% of students moved up at least one course
level,
-91% completed all web-based FOCUS2
modules, 62% completed all web-based financial
literacy modules,
-Two service projects were only offered and did not
provide adequate capacity for maximizing
opportunity for student participation,
-64% of student aid student packages complete or
27/42 fall 14 eligible FTFT
Albert Einstein
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 12
Major Program Goals & Objectives
C. Counseling and Advisement
SLO Goal: Students participating in counseling
and advisement services will demonstrate the
ability to develop and implement an
individualized plan for academic success,
personal and career development, in
addressing educational and life goals
Key Objectives (s) Students will:
Objective 1: Identify fields of study that are
consistent with their interests, abilities, and
life goals
Objective 2: Develop and implement a
meaningful educational plan
Objective 3: Know how to locate college policies
and procedures regarding registration,
academic standing, and student conduct
Objective 4: Identify and utilize resources
independently to evaluate their progress toward
degree completion
Objective 5: Know where and how to access
appropriate support services to accommodate
their unique needs
Assessment Method & Criteria for Success
Assessment Method
To be measured by an on-line
advising survey administered during
the fall 2014 and spring 15
semesters; the availability of the
Colleague Student Planning Module,
and use of FOCUS2- a career
assessment and planning web-based
system
Criteria for Success
Survey results are to show that at
minimum 75% of respondents
demonstrated behaviors indicative
of their ability to meet three or more
of the learning outcomes listed, and
have utilized the Colleague Student
Planning Module and FOCUS2
Outcomes
This SLO goal was not pursued- and it’s
planning and implementation is assigned to our
EOF counselors.
One of the two EOF counselors under voluntary
leave, left to serve as Executive Director, New
Jersey Center for Student Success. Each counselor
were to teach several sections of a college
readiness seminar for Poseidon- a new Early
College initiative established in partnership with
the Neptune District Board of Education. The one
counselor assumed responsibility for all of the
college readiness sections in the absence of the
second EOF counselor- while maintaining all
standard responsibilities for the program. A new
EOF counselor under temporary assignment came
on board but her transition coupled with the
limited availability of her EOF colleague made
moving this goal forward a task that could not be
addressed.
Major Program Goals & Objectives
D. Financial Literacy Education
SLO Goal: Students utilizing Financial Literacy
101, a web-based e-learning system, will
demonstrate an understanding of financial
literacy concepts and strategies serving to
motivate them to want to engage in financial
planning and protective behaviors for
ensuring their financial health
Key Objective (s) Students will:
AUO Objective 1: Infuse across the summer
bridge program, student success event
programming, and curricular options as
student supports- Objective Partially Met:
Summer only implementation
SLO Objective 1 : Assess financial stress and
spending habits and develop a monthly
budget that can be referenced on an ongoing
basis- Objective Partially Met: Summer only
implementation
SLO Objective 2: Identify key facts about
establishing and managing credit, credit
counseling, debt reduction/debt collection
rights, and identity theft and its prevention
strategies- Objective Partially Met: Summer
only implementation
Assessment Method &
Criteria for Success
Assessment Method
To be measured by pre-post quizzes,
worksheet completion, record of
actions plans, completion of
modules, student survey,
meeting requirements for certificate
completion
Criteria for Success
Realize increases in pre to post
financial literacy competency scores
Realize at minimum 85% student
eligibility for certificate completion
Student survey results are to
show positive perceptions of
programming efforts
Outcomes
Assessment Method, Partially Met
This initiative was launched and its assessment
methods and infusion across aspects of the
program were modified in light of the staff
shortages in our EOF SDA lines. For only 6 months
during the year did we have both of our EOF SDAs
on board- note each is a part-time position.
Criteria for Success- Partially Met
The pre and post design was eliminated
Certificate completion only applied to summer
program as staffing shortage required
elimination of Sept-May activities- 62% of the
students earned certificates, Minimum
Standard not Met
Student survey results were limited to summer 14
program offering, and were positive- the system
has a built in student survey feature for each
module, Standard Met
Napoleon Hill
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 13
Major Program Goals & Objectives
E. Learning Assistance- Math Focus
AUO Goal: Provide students weekly fall Math
Supervised Study Sessions to promote their
successful course completion
Key Objective (s)
Objective 1: Engage students in math study
skill assessment and introduce available on-line
resources- Objective Not Met: No instructor
follow-up
Objective 2: Utilize course specific math review
sheets to assess math proficiency & target
practice drills to include test simulation-
Objective Fully Met: Material secured and
used within sessions
Objective 3: Incorporate academic monitoring
system to alert math learning assistant of
student performance issues and conduct
follow- up- Objective Fully Met: System used
and one to one sessions spun off of outreach
Objective 4: On a formative and summative
basis gain student feedback on importance of
sessions and impact on their mastery of
course content- Objective Partially Met: Did
not administer survey
Assessment Method &
Criteria for Success
Assessment Method
One-minute feedback cards, student
survey, session attendance, final
course grades
Criteria for Success
Supervised Study: Minimum 65% of
students attending 50% or more
sessions with course performance
outcomes for this group as follows:
-minimum 75% course passing rate
-minimum aggregate GPA of 2.50
-minimum 75% of course grades in
A-C range
Outcomes
Assessment Methods, Partially Met
All assessment methods except the student
survey was employed.
Criteria for Success, Partially Met
Supervised Study: 61% of students attended
50% or more of sessions, Minimum Standard
Not Met
For 61% who attended 50% or more of sessions:
- 77% course passing rate achieved, Minimum
Standard Exceeded
- aggregate gpa of 2.50 achieved, Minimum
Standard Met
- 84% of course grades in A-C range, Minimum
Standard Exceeded
Booker T. Washington
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 14
Major Program Goals & Objectives
F. Student Success Event Programming
SLO Goal: Students participating in success events will increase their knowledge and comprehension of principles and practices which can promote their health and wellness, academic and career success, broaden their understanding of diversity issues, and
foster their active citizenship
Key Objectives (s) Students will:
Objective 1: Identify ways to develop preventative and lifelong habits which can maintain their physical and mental wellbeing
Objective 2: Describe learning strategies & list resources for managing their academic studies
Objective 3: Define academic, occupational, and
general employability skills in order to obtain and/or advance employment opportunities
Objective 4: List steps to completing the four year college transfer process and identify transfer resources available to them
Objective 5: Identify ways to reduce prejudice,
discrimination, and stereotyping and the impact of
those practices.
Objective 6: Identify ways to make a difference in
the civic life of our communities and recognize the
knowledge, skills, and values to make that
difference
Assessment Method & Criteria for Success
Assessment Method
To be measured by pre and post-
workshop surveys, conference
evaluations, and annual program
services survey
Criteria for Success
Evidence of learning gains across the
domains listed below and to include
learning applied in addressing student
goals related to these domains
-Health and Wellness
-Learning Strategies
-Employment/Workforce Entry
-Transfer Preparation
-Diversity Awareness
-Social Responsibility and Civic
Engagement
Outcomes
This SLO goal was not pursued- and while we
sponsored four conference venues and
delivered student programming for a number of
the targeted areas, the assessment model could
not be launched as staffing shortages, new hire
transition issues, and staff assignments unrelated
to EOF operations, contributed to significant difficulties
with mounting any consistent effort to address this goal.
This past year, we only had the availability of both
EOF SDA staff (each part-time) for 6 months of the
year, and this window of time was not conducive to
promoting the planning and development needed to
launch this assessment goal.
In addition, one of two EOF counselors under
voluntary leave, left to serve as Executive Director,
New Jersey Center for Student Success. Each
counselor was to teach several sections of a college
readiness seminar for Poseidon- a new Early College
initiative established in partnership with the
Neptune District Board of Education. The one
counselor assumed responsibility for all of the
college readiness sections in the absence of the
second EOF counselor- while maintaining all standard
responsibilities for the program.
A new EOF counselor under temporary assignment
came on board but her transition coupled with the
limited availability of her EOF colleague made
moving forward this goal a task that in coordination
with our EOF SDA staff could not be addressed
effectively.
Abraham Lincoln
______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 15
Major Program Goals & Objectives
G: Student Leadership Development
AUO Goal: Provide students opportunities to exercise
skills of active citizenship in demonstrating a
commitment and responsibility to work with others
towards public purposes
Key Objective (s)
Objective 1: Centralize coordination of programming within scope of responsibilities assigned to EOF SDA and student interns- Objective Partially Met:
Coordination shared between EOF SDA and EOF Director
Objective 2: Allocate special programming funds to support delivery of team development and training events -Objective Partially Met: Two retreats held
Objective 3: Sponsor public education events on
social issue topics; identify advocacy/direct action and community service projects and facilitate student participation; -Objective Fully Met: Over 25 service projects completed, including development of summer 15 calendar
Objective 4: Build into learning model an emphasis on service-learning -Objective Partially Met: primary method based on various forms of reflection
exercises
Objective 5: Establish co-sponsorships on programming with academic departments, student groups, and external organizations, Objective Not Met: student learning curve and team development
process pushed this off the plate
Objective 6: Seek funding support from the Office of Student Life and Activities, Objective Not Met:
student learning curve and team development process pushed this off the plate
Assessment Method &
Criteria for Success
Assessment Method
To be measured by personnel hires, budget set-up, and programming events
To be measured by student work
samples, student participation in
planning activities and reflection
exercises, student evaluation of program
To be measured by feedback surveys
from organizations, groups,
departments worked with
Criteria for Success
Minimum one project per month made
available to students, survey results are
to show that at minimum 75% of
respondents view their participation as
having met their expectations for being
of meaningful service to others;
organizations worked with are to confirm
benefits experienced with project
partnerships developed
-number and type of projects
-number of project participants
-number and types of organizations or
groups worked with
-planning meeting effectiveness
-team development process
-project participant feedback
-feedback from organizations, groups,
departments worked with
Outcomes
A decision was made to launch a Federal Work Study
supported full year service leadership program for first-
year students- under the coordination and facilitation of
an EOF SDA and the EOF director. Due to staff vacancy
there was only one EOF SDA on board- thus the
considerable involvement of the EOF director.
The EOF Rising Leaders Academy was born- and
while the objectives for this goal remained intact, the
service delivery model’s development and implementation
took center stage- and assessment as described in
this goal took a back seat.
The mission of the EOF Rising Leaders Academy is to foster
first year EOF student participation in community service,
advocacy, and public education activities, in addressing
societal issues of public concern.
All summer 14 bridge students had a Civic Engagement
Seminar build into their schedules and the it served as a
recruiting source for the new initiative. Thirteen students
were accepted in the Academy.
Academy participants attended 3 hour class sessions, once
a week throughout the fall and spring terms. Social issue
topics were explored and addressed through participation in
and development of service projects. Their learning was
supported by a team-development process built into the
class structure, and further supported by fall and winter
session retreats, and their attending several educational
seminars, workshops, and conferences.
Academy participants worked with a variety of
organizations, participated in over 25 service projects, and
developed the summer 15 bridge program’s civic
engagement calendar.
Malcolm X
______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 16
Major Program Goals & Objectives
H. Project Excel: Probationary
Student Interventions
AUO Goal: Provide students in academic
difficulty workshops, individualized plans, and
continuous support to improve their academic
standing and persistence towards graduation.
Key Objective (s)
Objective 1: Target full-time enrolled students on
college probation and or financial aid (SAP)
probation and require program participation
Objective 2: Post EOF grants ONLY after
students have attended a program
orientation meeting/ workshop
Objective 3: Assist students with assessing
difficulties, setting goals for addressing these,
and developing individualized action-plans
Objective 4: Use the college’s academic alert
system to monitor course performance
Objective 5: Conduct individual counseling
sessions for advisor/student follow-up
Objective 6: Create a within-term EOF grant
appeal process for non-participants factoring
in the November and March deadline dates for
requesting awards
Assessment Method &
Criteria for Success
Assessment Method
To be measured by data analysis of
term statistics, end of term
academic status, related changes,
and next term return rates;
compare same on participant and
non- participant basis; utilize survey
to assess student view on impact of
program on academic standing and
influence on decision to re-enroll for
next term
Criteria for Success
Realize minimum 50% student
participation rate within 7 weeks of
term, positive gains in number of
students removing themselves
from probation and or avoiding
suspension/dismissal, and
obtaining 70% next term re-
enrollment rate for program
participants
Outcomes
This AUO goal was not adequately supported –
due to the following.
One of the two EOF counselors under voluntary
leave, left to serve as Executive Director, New
Jersey Center for Student Success. Each counselor
were to teach several sections of a college
readiness seminar for Poseidon- a new Early College
initiative established in partnership with the
Neptune District Board of Education. The one
counselor assumed responsibility for all of the
college readiness sections in the absence of the
second EOF counselor- while maintaining all
standard responsibilities for the program. A new
EOF counselor under temporary assignment came
on board but her transition coupled with the limited
availability of her EOF colleague made moving this
goal forward a task that could not be fully
addressed.
In addition, student participation is promoted by
high intensity student outreach conducted by EOF
SDA staff- we were short one staff member for a
period of time as well. Student participation was so
weak that any assessment is pointless.
This assessment goal is maintained for 15-16.
Bo Bennett
______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 17
Major Program Goals & Objectives
I. Curricular Options as Student Supports
AUO Goal: Broaden curricular options to include offering both fall and spring courses that are part of the Human Development (HUDV) umbrella in
supporting the college success of program students
Objective 1: Continue to enroll FTFT students in EOF staffed course sections of First Year Seminar, a one
credit fall course that is part of the college’s Human Development (HUDV) curriculum and an FYE option- thread aspects of FOCUS 2 a career assessment and planning web-based system into the First Year Seminar-Objective Partially Met: FOCUS2 not threaded
Objective 2: Gain approval for EOF staff to teach during the spring term two additional courses that
are a part of the HUDV (Human Development) curriculum and enroll program students in these one credit courses- Achievement Motivation and Career Exploration Seminars-Objective Fully Met:
Courses ran
Objective 3: Utilize Achievement Motivation in part as an option for FTFT students with three developmental (basic skill) areas required for completion and for first year students in academic
difficulty-Objective Partially Met: Three area option not exercised
Objective 4: Utilize the Career Exploration Seminar
for first year students and students who are undecided about their majors- use FOCUS2 a career assessment and planning web- based system as the framework for the course-Objective Not Met: FOCUS2 not integrated
Assessment Method &
Criteria for Success Assessment Method
Note on record of approved courses and
designated EOF sections; course
enrollment rosters; program services
survey; instructor/course evaluations;
transcript analysis
Criteria for Success
Minimum 80% FTFT maintaining full-
time loads through spring 15 term
Student responses to program
services survey indicate strong
agreement that course enrollment
contributed to various success
measures to include:
-increased understanding of career
assessment & planning process and
increased strength of career
decidedness
-increased perceptions of desire to
succeed
-improved academic performance
Outcomes
Assessment Method, Partially Met
A section of Achievement Motivation Seminar and a
section of the Career Exploration Seminar, each a one
credit offering, was run for the spring 2015 semester,
course enrollment secured, program survey was not
developed, course evaluations not secured, and a
transcript analysis completed.
Criteria for Success, Not Met
One of the two EOF counselors under voluntary leave, left
to serve as Executive Director, New Jersey Center for
Student Success. Each counselor were to teach several
sections of a college readiness seminar for Poseidon- a
new Early College initiative established in partnership with
the Neptune District Board of Education. The one
counselor assumed responsibility for all of the college
readiness sections in the absence of the second EOF
counselor- while maintaining all standard responsibilities
for the program. A new EOF counselor under temporary
assignment came on board but her transition coupled with
the limited availability of her EOF colleague made moving
this goal forward a task that could not be fully addressed.
In addition, student participation is promoted by high
intensity student outreach conducted by EOF SDA staff-
we were short one staff member for a period of time as
well. Student participation was so weak that any
assessment is pointless.
Charles J. Givens
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 18
Major Program Goals & Objectives
J. Communications Management &
Learning Technology
AUO Goal: Redesign the EOF website to serve
as a student success portal, placing emphasis
on establishing the site as a communications
hub and educational resource for students,
parents, and educators
Key Objective (s)
O1: Build into site touch points which promote
prospective and current student use of the site
for admissions, enrollment, elements of direct
service provision, and to facilitate student
assessment of program services
O2: Integrate e-learning and adopted learning
management systems to address particular
student learning and development goals
O3: Incorporate social media integration to
broaden program visibility and create additional
program access points
O4: Provide parents and educators resources to
assist them with promoting the college access
and success of their children/students, in
particular low-income, first generation
O5: Based on college readiness address mobile-
ready site functionality
Assessment Method &
Criteria for Success
Assessment Method
To be measured by roll-out of
project management plan and
completion of associated milestones
Criteria for Success
Full site launch, January 2015
User post-launch feedback results on
file by March 2015
Outcomes
This goal was put on hold as a third EOF SDA,
a newly developed part-time position, was a late
fall hire and the majority of her time was devoted
to designing web-based student event invitations,
and web-based email marketing campaigns for
various program promotions, as well as engaging
in extensive student outreach efforts- primarily
scheduling individual student appointments with
for EOF SDS staff.
It is a 15-16 goal and while the above work
continues, we now have a preliminary site that is
live and undergoing modifications since July- and
is to be structured to address the objectives
listed in this goal.
Benjamin Franklin
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 19
Major Program Goals & Objectives
K. Dashboard Indicators AUO Goal: Develop a Dashboard that is to be used to facilitate decision-making and drive program improvements
Key Objective (s)
O1: Utilize key performance indicators established by our reporting agency and presented in Program Performance Criteria Reports issued to all programs and institutional Presidents- Objective Met: used
prior PPCs
O2: Determine if any key performance indicators may be drawn from the Annual Report prepared for the program’s reporting agency- Objective Met: used
prior annual reports
O3: Review major operations to identify key performance indicators and suitability for Dashboard
inclusion- Objective Not Met: work not begun
O4: Align elements of the dashboard to strategic directions established by the college’s Jubilee Plan- Objective Not Met- work not begun
05: Determine manner of Dashboard presentation
and review process used to facilitate decision-making Objective Not Met: Must select software solution before moving to this objective
06: Data collect based on Dashboard design and
selected period of time, and utilize the tool for impacting decision-making and program improvement goals- Objective Partially Met: Data gathering is in motion but Dashboard design, launch and use, must still be completed
Assessment Method &
Criteria for Success
Assessment Method
To be measured by:
-record of discussions with program
staff to include orientation to
assessment tool and process for
developing the Dashboard
-record of discussion with Institutional
Research and Planning
-record of key indicators and
data collection methods
-release of periodic progress reports on
Dashboard development
-record of Dashboard adoption to
include data collection timetable, and
related report preparation and
presentation
Criteria for Success
Dashboard on record by January, 2015,
and Dashboard data available and used
by March 2015 to set improvement
targets
Outcomes
-
Assessment Method, Partially Met
We met with Institutional Research and Planning and the
initiative is not an area they have any significant
experience with. Our EOF Program Coordinator while
versed in internal MIS systems has no experience with
this type of initiative either.
We have gathered data-sets in excel files but no longer
are receiving Performance Criteria Reports, and as we
should we are gathering similar information internally-
using in part data gathered for the Annual Report and
referencing prior PPC reports.
A short list has been compiled of software solutions to
develop the Dashboard primarily using Excel
spreadsheets or Access files. We will need to find an all-
one product, front to back end that allows for web-site
integration.
An important next step is to ascertain any limitations
our website framework and content management
features have- and select a software solution
developed for novice-users.
Criteria for Success, Not Met
Dashboard not up, and initiative is maintained
for FY16 implementation.
Data collection based on a determination of key
performance indicators may be drawn from:
Walter Scott
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 20
OSHE/EOF FY15 Annual Report Narrative _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Brookdale Community College EOF Program, CAR Suite 105
Lincroft, NJ
Main Office: 732-224-2510 Fax: 732-224-1969
FY15 Program Staff
Richard Morales-Wright, Director
Kathy Trammell, Program Coordinator Eunice Clark, Senior Office Assistant
Fidel Wilson, EOF Counselor Maria Fernandez, EOF Counselor Yesenia Madas, EOF Counselor
Orpha Vernet, Student Development Associate Christina Skyers, Student Development Associate
Rebecca Clark, Student Development Associate Catherine Cutlip, Student Development Associate
Karen O’Neill, Student Development Associate ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Preparing students for college completion, transfer to four year colleges, workforce entry, and responsible citizenship ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________