Environmental Safeguard Monitoring Report - adb.org · Lingkungan) RPL Indonesian Environmental Monitoring Plan (Rencana Pemantauan Lingkungan) RRDP Regional Roads Development Project

Environmental Safeguard Monitoring Report

15 September 2017 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report

INO: Loan 2817- Regional Road Development

Project

Prepared by Project Management Unit, Directorate of Road Network Development, for the

Directorate General of Highways, Ministry of Public Works and Housing and the Asian

Development Bank.

NOTES

(i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Indonesia ends on 31 December. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2011 ends on 31 December 2011.

(ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This environmental safeguard monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

AMDAL Indonesian Environmental Impact Assessment (Analisis Mengenai

Dampak Lingkungan Hidup)

AMP Asphalt mixing plant

ANDAL Indonesian Environmental Impact Statement (Analisis Dampak

Lingkungan Hidup)

BLHD Regional Environmental Agency (Badan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah)

CTC Core Team Consultant

DSC Design and Supervision Consultants

DGH Directorate General of Highway (Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga)

Dinas PU Provincial Public Works Agency (Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Provinsi)

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

EMP Environmental Management Plan

EMMP Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (issued by DGH as

part of the contract)

GOI Government of Indonesia

GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism

IEE Initial Environmental Examination

IDB Islamic Development Bank

MPWH Ministry of Public Works and Housing

MPR Monthly Progress Report

PIU Project Implementation Unit

PMU Project Management Unit

RKL Indonesian Environmental Management Plan (Rencana Pengelolaan

Lingkungan)

RPL Indonesian Environmental Monitoring Plan (Rencana Pemantauan

Lingkungan)

RRDP Regional Roads Development Project

Sub-EARS Environmental Affairs and Road Safety Sub-Directorate

UKL-UPL Indonesian Environmental Management Effort and Environmental

Monitoring Effort Document (Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan - Upaya

Pemantauan Lingkungan)

2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS..........................................................................................................i

TABLES.................................................................................................................................ii

FIGURES............................................................................................................................... ii

APPENDICES........................................................................................................................ ii

Part I: INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1

1.1. Brief Project Description ............................................................................................ 1

1.2. Objectives of the AEMR ............................................................................................ 4

1.3. Construction Activities and Project Progress in 2015................................................. 4

1.4. RRDP Project Organization and Environmental Management Team......................... 7

Part II: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING.......................................................................... 11

2.1. Environmental Approvals and Permits..................................................................... 11

2.2. Environmental Monitoring........................................................................................ 17

Part III: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ...................................................................... 28

3.1 Environmental Management Plan (EMP)................................................................. 28

3.2 Status of Monthly Environmental Report Submission .............................................. 33

3.3 Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures.......................................................... 34

3.4 ADB Review Missions and CTC Site Inspections .................................................... 34

3.5. Non-compliances and Corrective Action Plans ........................................................ 35

3.6. Public Consultations................................................................................................ 42

3.7. Public Complaints/Grievances and Resolutions....................................................... 42

PART IV: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................... 44

4.1. Conclusions............................................................................................................. 44

4.2. Recommendations................................................................................................... 45



ii

TABLES

Table 1: Status of RRDP Sub-projects/Packages (as of 2015).............................................. 5

Table 2: Environmental Documents/Permits of RRDP Sub-projects/Packages ................... 12

Table 3: Environmental Documents/Permits for Asphalt Mixing Plant and Quarry............... 14

Table 4: Status of Environmental Monitoring in 2015 .......................................................... 18

Table 5: Baseline Ambient Air Quality Measurements......................................................... 23

Table 6: Baseline River Water Quality Measurements ........................................................ 24

Table 7: Baseline Noise Level Measurements .................................................................... 26

Table 8: Status of DGH, SDEA, PMU and CTC on EMP Responsibilities............................ 28

Table 9: Status of the DSC on EMP Responsibilities in 2015.............................................. 30

Table 10: Status of the Contractors on EMP Responsibilities.............................................. 32

Table 11: Detailed Status of Monthly Environmental Report Submissions........................... 33

Table 12: ADB Review Mission and CTC Inspection........................................................... 34

Table 13: Non-Compliances and Corrective/Preventive Actions Identified in 2015.............. 36

Table 14: Complaints/ Grievances Recorded in 2015.......................................................... 42

FIGURES

Figure 1: Location Sub--projects/Packages at West and North Kalimantan........................... 2

Figure 2: Location Sub-projects/Packages at Central and East Java .................................... 3

Figure 3: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation - National ............................... 8

Figure 4: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 1: West Kalimantan .... 9

Figure 5: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 1: North Kalimantan.... 9

Figure 6: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 2: Central Java ......... 10

Figure 7: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 3: East Java.............. 10

Figure 8: Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM)................................................................ 43

APPENDICES

Appendix A - Implementation of Environmental Mitigating Measures – Construction Phase

Appendix B - Air Quality, Water Quality, and Noise Level Monitoring Data

Appendix C - Photographs



1

PART I: INTRODUCTION

1.1. Brief Project Description

1. The Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP) is financed through a Project Loan from

the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Islamic Development Bank (IDB). The project

proponent and executing agency is the Directorate General of Highways (DGH), known as

Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga (Ditjen Bina Marga) of the Ministry of Public Works and

Housing (MPWH), known as Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat.

Since October 2014, the Government of Indonesia has combined the public work and

public housing sectors into the Ministry of Public Works and Housing of.

2. The RRDP aims to improve important national and strategic road corridors in Northern

Kalimantan and Southern Java to encourage economic growth in these two (2) less

developed and poorer areas of Indonesia. The rehabilitation, capacity expansion and new

construction of roads will improve connectivity and access to services in the

abovementioned provinces. Improved road infrastructure in southern Java is necessary

for increased economic growth to improve access to markets and to attract investment in

that area. Road network development in Kalimantan will ensure that economic

development will occur in less developed and remote areas. The Project will improve

access of poor rural and minority villages to income generating opportunities and social

services, particularly in North Kalimantan.

3. The RRDP consists of eleven (11) sub-projects or packages and the scope of works

include: rehabilitation, improvement or construction about 476 km of roads and bridges in

four (4) provinces of Indonesia, namely West Kalimantan and North Kalimantan (Figure

1); and Central Java and East Java (Figure 2). Of the 476 km, about 3.860 km will involve

the rehabilitation or replacement of bridges and 40 km will be the construction of new roads

along agricultural areas where there are existing earthen tracks in some sections. ADB

finances approximately 400 km of roads in East Java, West and East Kalimantan, and

consulting services. IDB provides funding for approximately 76 km of roads in Central

Java.

4. The civil works of the RRDP included widening and partial reconstruction of all roads to a

minimum width of 6 m with some minor deviations. All subproject roads are designed as

two-lane two-way roads, which consist of a 6-meter carriage way plus 2 x 1-meter m

aggregate shoulder and 2 x 1-meter side ditch. New alignment will also be constructed

along existing tracks and/or delineated areas. Rehabilitation, asphalt pavement, and

widening works will be undertaken on existing substandard 2-lane gravel or asphalt roads

which are strategic to meet national highway standards.



2

Figure 1: Location Sub--projects/Packages at West and North Kalimantan



3

Figure 2: Location Sub-projects/Packages at Central and East Java



4

1.2. Objectives of the AEMR

5. The objective of the Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR) is to present the

environmental mitigation and monitoring activities undertaken by the RRDP in 2015. This

report also includes updates on project progress, status including gaps identified in the

EMP implementation and environmental monitoring data. Further, it reports on non-

compliances identified in the ADB Review Mission and CTC site inspections conducted in

that year. Community complaints and Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) implemented

in 2015 are also reported.

6. The method employed for developing this AEMR is based on data and information that are

reviewed, extracted, analyzed, and as available from the following sources:

• Design and Supervision Consultant (DSC) Monthly Environmental Reports from

October 2014 to December 2015;

• Core Team Consultant (CTC) Environmental Specialist Site Visit Reports; and

• Correspondences of/between the contractors, DSC, and CTC.

1.3. Construction Activities and Project Progress in 2015

7. The eighteen (18) road sections of the RRDP were grouped into eleven (11) construction

work packages (CW). The packages including their contractor details and work progress

achieved up to the end of 2015 are shown in Table 1. The contractors for the eleven (11)

CW packages had been mobilized and commenced the construction activities in 2015.

8. The road sections that are combined into a single construction work package are as

follows:

West Kalimantan

• Sosok – Tayan and Tanjung – Batas Kota Sangau were grouped as CW-05;

• Singkawang - Tebas Section1 (previously Singkawang overlay), Singkawang -

Tebas (Section 2), Sambas Bypass and Tanjung Harapan - Galing as CW-06; and

• Galing - Simpang Tanjung and Simpang Tanjung - Aruk (Batas Serawak, Malaysia)

as CW-07.

North Kalimantan (previously part of East Kalimantan)

• Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas and Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas -

Sekatak Buji (Phase 1) as CW-08; and

• Simpang Tiga Apas - Simanggaris (Section 2) and Simanggaris - Batas Negara

(Serudong) as CW-11.



5

Table 1: Status of RRDP Sub-projects/Packages (as of 2015)

Package No. Road Section Length (km) Contractor Activities and Progress

Central Java

CW-01 Tambak Mulyo – Wawar 38.46 Joint operation of PT

Pembangunan Perumahan

(Persero) and PT Armada Hada

Graha

Clearing and grubbing, common

embankment, and common

excavation

Project progress: 2.24%

CW-02 Giriwoyo - Duwet (Section-1) 23.75 PT.Hutama Karya (Persero) Bridge construction and road

widening (excavation)


CW-03 Wawar - Congot 14.13 PT. Jaya Konstruksi Manggala

Pratama, Tbk

Clearing and grubbing, box

culverts, and masonry works for

retaining wall


East Java

CW-04 Jolosutro – Sendangbiru 21.30 PT. Hutama Karya (Persero) Road shoulder, drainage and

bridge construction


West Kalimantan

CW-05

Sosok - Tayan 41.60 Joint operation of PT Yasa Patria

Perkasa and PT Budi Bakti Prima

Common excavation and

asphalting works

Project progress: 8.71%Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau 37.60

CW-06

Tebas - Singkawang Section 1 (previously

Singkawang overlay)

3.60 Joint operation of PT Brantas

Abipraya, PT Tri Citra Perdana

and PT Trifa Abadi

Excavation (road widening) and

side ditch

Project progress: 58.26%Tebas - Singkawang Section 2 26.20

Sambas Bypass 6.10



6

Package No. Road Section Length (km) Contractor Activities and Progress

Galing - Tanjung Harapan 20.07

CW-07

Simpang Tanjung - Galing 40.91 Joint operation of PT Waskita

Karya and PT Yala Patria Perkasa

Bridge construction, excavation

and grade preparation, and side

ditch


Aruk (Batas Sarawak) -Simpang Tanjung 11.13

North Kalimantan (This area was part of East Kalimantan Province prior to 2013)

CW-08

Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung

Palas, and Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas -

Sekatak Buji (Section 1)

34.82 PT Waskita Karya Excavation and grade preparation,

pavement widening and shoulders,

side ditch, and box culvert


CW-09

Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji

(Section2)

65.03 Joint operation of PT Brantas

Abipraya and PT Mahir Jaya

Mahakam Raya

Side ditch


CW-10

Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris

(Section-1)

45.00 Joint operation of PT

Pembangunan Perumahan and PT

Perdasa

Excavation and embankment, side

ditch, and grade preparation


CW-11


(Section-2)

27.15 Halla Corporation Common excavation and rock

excavation, common embankment,

and side ditch/drainage

Project progress: 12.02%Simanggaris - Batas Negara (Serudong) 20.80



7

1.4. RRDP Project Organization and Environmental Management Team

9. Several national and provincial agencies are involved in the RRDP implementation and its

project management chart at the national level is shown in Figure 3. The Directorate

General of Highways (DGH) under the Ministry of Public Works and Housing (MPWH) is

the executing agency responsible for the overall RRDP implementation. The Project

Management Unit (PMU) established within DGH are headed by the Director of the

Directorate Road Networks Development, and it facilitates land acquisition, resettlement,

and environmental mitigation. Further, it ensures that local concerns are addressed

adequately.

10. An Officer in Charge has been designated for the PMU to oversee day-to-day activities

and prepare progress reports. The PMU is assisted by the Core Team Consultant (CTC).

The PMU in coordination with the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) for the Environmental

and Road Safety (EAR) of the Directorate Road Networks Development ensured that the

EMP are implemented throughout the project phases. The Design and Supervision

Consultants (DSC) are expected to conduct regular monitoring of the EMP implementation

by the Contractors and submit monthly environmental reports to the DGH/PMU and CTC.

The CTC will coordinate with the DSC in this aspect. In total, there are eleven (11)

contractors and/or its joint operation partners working for the respective CW in Central and

East Java as well as West and North Kalimantan, and these contractors are supervised

by three (3) DSCs. Figures 4 to 7 show the project management organization of the RRDP

based on the contractors and DSCs working areas in West and North Kalimantan as well

as in Central and East Java.

11. The DSCs worked with their respective Contractors under their supervision on the EMP

implementation. During the construction stage, the Contractors are primarily responsible

for the implementation of the environmental mitigation measures and associated

monitoring for their respective contract work packages. The DSCs should monitor and

prepare the monthly environmental reports and submit these reports to the PMU and CTC.

Th DSCs appointed for the 11 CW packages are:

• DSC-1 CECI Engineering Consultants, Inc., for all CW packages in West and North

Kalimantan;

• DSC-2 Botek Bosphorus Technical Consulting Corporation for all CW packages in

Central Java; and

• DSC-3 PT Perentjana Djaja for the work package in East Java Province.

The CTC appointed for the RRDP is Renardet S.A. and its joint venture partners. Based

on the submitted monthly environmental reports of the DSCs, the PMU with the assistance

of the CTC prepares the Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring Reports for submission

to ADB through the DGH. The PMU coordinates with the DSCs on matters related to the

submitted monthly environmental reports.



8

Figure 3: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation - National



9

Figure 4: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 1: West Kalimantan

Figure 5: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 1: North Kalimantan



10

Figure 6: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 2: Central Java

Figure 7: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 3: East Java



11

PART II: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

2.1. Environmental Approvals and Permits

12. Since the IEE of the RRDP issued in October 2011, the Government of Indonesia has

promulgated the Government Regulation (Peraturan Pemerintah) No. 27 of 2012 (“GR

27/2012”) on Environmental Permitting. The GR 27/2012 requires that every business

and/or activity that will generate significant environmental impacts must have an AMDAL

(Environmental Impact Assessment), whereas those that do not generate significant

impacts must have a UKL-UPL (Environmental Management Effort and Environmental

Monitoring Effort) document. These documents are subject to approval by the Ministry of

Environment and Forestry or local governments (i.e. provincial and regency/municipality)

depending on the nature and scope of the business and/or activity. Based on the AMDAL

or UKL-UPL approval, the business and/or activity must apply for the Environmental Permit

(Izin Lingkungan) to the same government authority that granted the AMDAL or UKL-UPL

approval.

13. The requirement to secure the Environmental License in addition to the AMDAL or UKL-

UPL approval only applies for the AMDAL and UKL-UPL approved by the government after

the stipulation of the GR 27/2012. This means that the AMDAL and UKL-UPL approvals

of the RRDP granted prior to the stipulation of this GR remains valid and hence the project

owner does not require to apply for the Environmental Permit if no changes or

modifications are made to the mentioned documents. If changes to these documents are

made, a new or amended AMDAL and UKL-UPL will be subject to a new approval process

and subsequently the application for the Environmental Permit will be required. Table 2

presents the government approvals secured for the AMDAL and UKL-UPL of the RRDP

sub-project/work packages that were reported in 2015. Table 3 presents the similar

approvals secured for the asphalt mixing plant and quarry distributed within the sub-

project/packages of the RRDP.

14. There are no records indicating whether the AMDAL or UKL-UPL approval as well as

Environmental Permit exist for the CW-04 road package (East Java) and part of the CW-

06 road package (West Kalimantan). There are also similar issues in terms of no records

indicating the existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL approval as well as Environmental Permit

for the asphalt mixing plants (AMPs) and quarries for all CW packages in North Kalimantan

and East Java. However, UKL-UPL approvals have been secured for some AMPs and

quarries operated by the CW packages in West Kalimantan and Central Java.

Confirmation is required for the existence of these mandatory environmental approvals

and permits for some CW road packages, AMPs and the quarries as identified in Tables 2

and 3.

15. The proposed addition of the 12.3 km Sambas - Tanjung Harapan road section, located in

Sambas District of West Kalimantan Province, requires the preparation of a new

environmental approval and permit. The design of the road was being undertaken in 2015,

and therefore the preparation of an AMDAL or UKL-UPL will be proceeded by the DSC-1,

after consultation with the Regional Environmental Agency (BLHD) and the Sub-

directorate of Environmental Affairs and Road Safety (Directorate of Road Networks

Development under the DGH).



12

Table 2: Environmental Documents/Permits of RRDP Sub-projects/Packages

Package No. Road Section Environmental Approval/Permit Approval/Permit Holder

Central Java

CW-01 Tambak Mulyo – Wawar

Length: 38.46 km

AMDAL approval No. 6655.1/14/2005 (dated 5 October 2005)

granted by Governor of Central Java

Road Agency (Dinas Bina Marga) of

Central Java Province

CW-02 Giriwoyo - Duwet (Section-1)

Length: 23.75 km

CW-03 Wawar - Congot

Length: 14.13 km

East Java

CW-04 Jolosutro – Sendangbiru

Length: 21.30 km

The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL approvals for this CW

package is subject to confirmation.

Subject to confirmation

West Kalimantan

CW-05

Sosok – Tayan

Length: 41.60 km

UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/30/BLHKPK-A (dated 16 February

2011) granted by the Environmental Agency (BLH) of Sanggau

Regency

Directorate General of Highways

Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau

Length: 37.60 km

UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/31/BLHKPK-A (dated 16

February 2011) granted by BLH of Sanggau Regency


CW-06

Tebas - Singkawang Section 1

(previously Singkawang overlay)

Length: 3.60 km

AMDAL approval No. 154/BLHD/2013 (dated 18 February 2013)

granted by Governor of West Kalimantan.



Road Agency (Dinas Bina Marga) of

West Kalimantan ProvinceTebas - Singkawang (Section 2)

Length: 26.20 km

Sambas Bypass

Length: 6.10 km



Subject to confirmation



13

Package No. Road Section Environmental Approval/Permit Approval/Permit Holder

Galing - Tanjung Harapan

Length: 20.07 km

UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/42/BLH-A (dated 16 February

2011) granted by BLH of Sambas Regency


CW-07

Simpang Tanjung - Galing

Length: 40.91 km

UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/10/BLH-A (dated 13 January

2011) granted by BLH of Sambas Regency


Aruk (Batas Sarawak) -Simpang

Tanjung

Length: 11.13 km

AMDAL approval No. 542/BLH/2015 (dated 9 July 2015) and

Environmental Permit No. 543/BLH/2015 (dated 9 July 2015);

granted by Head (Bupati) of Sambas Regency.


North Kalimantan

CW-08

Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung

Palas

Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak

Buji (Section 1)

Length: 34.82 kmUKL-UPL approval No. 24/660/BPDL-1/XII-2010 (dated 20

December 2010) granted by Bapedalda of Bulungan RegencyDirectorate General of Highways

CW-09

Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak

Buji (Section2)

Length: 65.03 km

CW-10


(Section -1)

Length: 45.00 kmUKL-UPL approval No. 660/334/B.1.1/BLHD/VIII/2013 (dated 7

August 2013) granted by Head of Nunukan Regency; and

Environmental Permit No. 188.45/614/VIII/2013 (dated 7 August

2013) granted by Head of Nunukan Regency


CW-11


(Section-2)

Length: 27.15 km

Simanggaris - Batas Negara (Serudong)

Length: 20.80 km

UKL-UPL approval No. 666/SCI/B.1.1/BLHD/XII/2016 (dated 13

December 2010) granted by Head of Nunukan Regency




14

Table 3: Environmental Documents/Permits for Asphalt Mixing Plant and Quarry

Package

No.Road Section

Asphalt mixing plant Quarry

Environmental Approval/PermitApproval/Permit

HolderEnvironmental Approval/Permit

Approval/Permit

Holder

Central Java

CW-01

Tambak Mulyo – Wawar

Length: 38.46 km

UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/634 (dated

23 June 2015) granted by the

Environmental Office (KLH) of Kebumen

Regency; and

The existence of Environmental Permit

for this facility is subject to confirmation.

PT Armada Hada

Graha

UKL/UPL approval based on KLH of

Kabupaten Kebumen Decree No.

660.1/158/II/2014 (dated 18 February

2014)



CV Lista Karya

CW-02

Giriwoyo - Duwet

(Section-1)

Length: 23.75 km

UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/UKl-

UPL.059/2015 (dated 9 October 2015)

granted by KLH office of Wonogiri

Regency.



PT Ratna The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL

approval or Environmental Permit for this

facility is subject to confirmation.

-

CW-03

Wawar - Congot

Length: 14.13 km

UKL/UPL approval No. 665.2/17/2015

(dated 22 May 2015) granted by KLH

office of Purworejo Regency; and



PT Jaya Kontruksi

Manggala Pratama,

The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL



-

East Java

CW-04

Jolosutro – Sendangbiru

Length: 21.30 km




- The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL



-



15

Package

No.Road Section




Approval/Permit

Holder

West Kalimantan

CW-05

Sosok – Tayan

Length: 41.60 kmThe existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL



-

UKL-UPL approval No.

660.1/02/BLHKPK-A (dated 11 January

2016) granted by the Regional

Environmental Office (BLHD) of Sanggau

Regency.



CV Yasa Quarindo

Tanjung - Batas Kota

Sanggau

Length: 37.60 km

CW-06

Tebas - Singkawang

Section 1 (previously

Singkawang overlay)

Length: 3.60 km

UKL/UPL approval No. 31/BI.H/2015

(dated 23 June 2014) granted by KLH of

Sambas Regency.



PT Brantas Abipraya




-

Tebas - Singkawang

(Section 2)

Length: 26.20 km

Sambas Bypass

Length: 6.10 km

Galing - Tanjung

Harapan

Length: 20.07 km

CW-07

Simpang Tanjung -

Galing

Length: 40.91 km

UKL/UPL approval No. 47/BLH/2015

(dated 17 September 2015) granted by

BLH of Sambas Regency.



Joint operation of PT

Waskita Karya and

PT Yasa Patria

Perkasa

UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/278.a/BLH-

A (dated 22 December 2014) granted by

BLH of Sambas Regency



PT Jaya Kontruksi

Manggala PratamaAruk (Batas Sarawak) -

Simpang Tanjung

Length: 11.13 km



16

Package

No.Road Section




Approval/Permit

Holder

North Kalimantan

CW-08

Tanjung Selor -

Simpang Tiga Tanjung

Palas


Palas - Sekatak Buji

(Section 1)

Length: 34.82 km




-




-

CW-09


Palas - Sekatak Buji

(Section2)

Length: 65.03 km







-

CW-10

Simpang Tiga Apas -

Simanggaris (Section-1)

Length: 45.00 km







-

Simpang Tiga Apas -

Simanggaris (Section-2)

Length: 27.15 km







-

CW-11

Simanggaris - Batas

Negara (Serudong)

Length: 20.80 km







-



17

2.2. Environmental Monitoring

16. The IEE’s Table 21 of the INO: RRDP (dated October 2011) requires the DSC, prior to the

commencement of the site works, should undertake environmental sampling (i.e. air

quality, noise, water quality, etc.) to establish the baseline conditions at each CW area.

Further, the DSC is required to implement the periodic Environmental Monitoring during

the construction phase as presented in Table 4. It generally requires the DSC to:

• Undertake monthly visual inspection of the following aspects: quarries and borrow

sites; material storage; erosion; landslide/rock fall; hydrocarbon/chemical storage;

waste management; surface water quality; air quality; noise; vibration;

landscaping/restoration; community; and traffic management; and

• Prepare monthly environmental monitoring reports for submission to PMU/SDEA

and CTC.

17. The status of each environmental monitoring requirements as reported by all DSCs is

summarized in Table 4, indicating that a few monitoring means were fully implemented as

part of the ongoing construction activities. Some monitoring was deemed as partially

implemented due to incomplete record suggesting whether the required monitoring means

have been regularly undertaken and the results documented. Nevertheless, most of the

monitoring means have not been implemented due to prolonged absence of the

environmental specialist of each DSC. Some quarry and borrow sites are still in operation,

and therefore some monitoring requirements with this regard are not yet applicable at this

stage.

18. The environmental monthly reports submitted by the DSC in 2015 does not have the

required environmental monitoring data indicating that both the baseline and periodic

sampling have not been undertaken for the mentioned period. In the light of these data,

the 2015 AEMR, however, attempts to present the available environmental baseline data

sourced from the government-approved AMDAL and UKL-UPL documents of the RRDP

sub-Projects/Work Packages, asphalt mixing plants and quarries/borrow pits (see Tables

5 to 7).



18

Table 4: Status of Environmental Monitoring

Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means FrequencyGuideline Values/Standards/

IndicatorsStatus in 2015

1. Quarries and

Borrow Operation

Quarry and borrow sites Undertaken in

designated areas duly

licensed/ approved by

concerned authority

Visual inspection to

ensure fill is only

obtained from licensed

designated sites

Monthly by DSC (i) Environmental

permit/approval from

concerned agency.

(ii) Activities shall be limited to

licensed designated areas

only.

Partially implemented due to the

absence of UKL-UPL approval

and/or Environmental Permit for

some quarries and borrow sites.

Quarry and borrow sites Implementation of

erosion control

Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) No evidence of water

ponding or presence of fresh

gullies.

(ii) No increased visual turbidity

of surface water.

Partially implemented as there is

incomplete record indicating

whether this inspection has

been regularly conducted and

the result reported.

Quarry and borrow sites Proper site closure as

specified in the

environmental mitigation

plan.

Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Pre-quarry conditions

(ii) Site left in a tidy state with

stable side slopes, proper

drainage and provided with

vegetation cover

(iii) DSC’s report testifying to

completion of restoration

work

Not applicable as quarries and

borrow sites are still in

operation.

2. Material Storage Site

Project alignment,

construction yard

Compliance with

requirements

Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Activities shall be limited to

designated areas only

(ii) Materials management

procedures implemented.

(iii) No visible puddles of oil or

oil contaminated soil.








19



3. Erosion

Project alignment Implementation of

erosion control

Visual inspection of

erosion prevention

measures and

occurrence of erosion

Monthly by DSC (i) Erosion control design

parameters.

(ii) No increased visual turbidity

of surface waters.






4. Landslide/Rockfall

Active landslide/ rock fall

sections and steep

mountainous slopes

Vegetation cover is

maintained.

Visual Inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Identified areas during

detailed design phase.

(ii) Adequacy, quality, and

specifications of planting;

Survival rate of plants.

Fully implemented as part of the

construction activities

Slope stabilization

engineering structures

(all susceptible areas

shall be protected by

either temporary or

permanent stabilization

works)

Slope stabilization

measures, landslide/

rockfall protection

measures

Visual inspection Monthly by DSC Adequacy, quality, and

specifications of landslide/rock

fall protection measures.


construction activities

5. Hydrocarbon/

Chemical Storage

Construction camps Compliance with


requirements

Visual Inspection of

storage facilities

Monthly by DSC Provision of adequate storage

facilities

Not implemented

6. Waste Management

Construction camps Cleanliness of workers’

camps

Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Proper collection, storage,

and disposal of solid waste.

(ii) Provision of clean and

adequate sanitation facilities.


camp operations.



20



Construction camps Proper site closure Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Timely and effective waste

disposal.

(ii) Site appearance restored.

(iii) DSC’s report testifying

restoration of site.

Not applicable as the

construction camps are still

used.

7. Surface Water

Quality

Bridge construction sites Local surface waters are

protected

Visual inspection of

water management

Monthly by DSC (i) Project activities do not

cause turbidity/siltation and

flow obstruction of surface

waters.

(ii) Adequacy, quality, and

specifications of protection

measures provided against

washouts






All bridge construction

sites – upstream and

directly downstream of

major rivers or after a

pollution event

(i) Total suspended

solids (TSS)

(ii) Oil and grease,

(iii) Turbidity,

(iv) pH

Water sample collection

and analyses by

accredited laboratory

By DSC:

(i) once before

commencement of

construction works

(baseline); and

(ii) subsequently after a

reported pollution

event and/or

complaints)

Standardization of River

Categories II based on

Governmental Regulation No.

82 of 2001

Not implemented

8. Air Quality

Sensitive sites such as

major settlements,

schools, hospitals, etc.,

close to construction

sites and other project-

related facilities where

(i) TSP

(ii) PM10

Air sample collection

and analyses by

accredited laboratory

By DSC:

(i) once before

commencement of

construction works;

and

(ii) subsequently 1 time

The Control of Air Pollution,

Government Regulation No. 41

of 1999

Not implemented



21



emission of high dust

levels occur.

a year

Asphalt mixing plant Designated areas Visual inspection to

ensure asphalt plant is

located >1 km from

residential areas

Monthly by DSC i) Environmental

approval/permit from

concerned agency.

ii) Activities shall be limited to

designated areas only

Partially implemented due to the

absence of UKL-UPL approval

and/or Environmental Permit for

some asphalt mixing plants.

Dust Compliance with

required mitigation

measures

Visual inspection to

ensure dust suppression

work plan is being

implemented

Monthly by DSC i) Measures, location, and

schedule for dust

suppression activities

ii) Air pollution control

equipment installed on

vehicles

iii) No complaints from

residents.

Partially implemented as there

was evidence of community

complaints about dust from the

road construction.

9. Noise

Sensitive areas Noise levels in dB(A) Noise meter By DSC:

i) Once before

commencement of

construction

activities; and

ii) Subsequently 2

times a year

i) The Control of Air Pollution,

Government Regulation No.

41 of 1999.

ii) Complaints from residents

Not implemented

10. Vibration

Sensitive areas Compliance with

required mitigation

measures

Visual inspection Monthly by DSC Complaints from residents Fully implemented as part of the

construction activities and

record of community complaints

11. Landscaping/

Reforestation



22



Project alignment Progress of reforestation

activities

Visual inspection Monthly by DSC i) Adequacy, quality and

specifications of planting

ii) Survival rate of plants

iii) Watchman on site



whether the progress of

reforestation has been

monitored.

12. Community

Project alignment (i) Consultations

(ii) Information

disclosure

Consult with government

and community groups

along the alignment to

monitor environmental

concerns

On-going by DSC (i) Number of public

consultations conducted

(ii) Recipients of project-related

documents

(iii) Number of complaints.


construction activities.

13. Traffic Management

Project alignment (i) Number of

complaints

(ii) Number of traffic

enforcers in place

(iii) Number of traffic and

warning signs in

place

Visual inspection to strict

adherence to applicable


measures

On-going by DSC Number of complaints and

accidents


construction activities.



23

19. As presented in Table 5, there are no baseline ambient air quality measurements or results

available reported in 2015 for the CW packages in Central and East Java as well as North

Kalimantan. However, some CW packages for West Kalimantan, particularly CW-06 and

CW-07, have baseline particulate matter (PM10) and total suspended particulate (TSP)

concentrations for one road section and their respective asphalt mixing plants (AMP) and

quarries. These two parameters are detected well below the Indonesian National Ambient

Air Quality Standards i.e. 150 µg/Nm3 (for PM10) and 230 µg/Nm3 (for TSP) as stipulated

in Government Regulation (GR) No. 41 of 1999 on Air Pollution Control.

Table 5: Baseline Ambient Air Quality Measurements

Road Section / Sampling PointSampling

DatePM10 TSP

Information

Source

Threshold value set by

GR No 41 of 1999150 µg/Nm3 230 µg/Nm3

Central Java

CW-01: Tambak Mulyo - Wawar - - - -

CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet - - - -

CW-03: Wawar - Congot - - - -

East Java -

CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru - - - -

West Kalimantan

CW-05 - Sosok – Tayan, Tanjung -

Batas Kota Sangga

8 Feb 2015 - 12 UKL-UPL Quarry -

Tambang Baru area

CW-06: Tebas -Singkawang Section

1 & 2, Sambas Bypass, Galing -

Tanjung Harapan

AMDAL for Tebas -

Singkawang

Section 1 & 2

Lat. 01013’37.5”

Long. 109o09’41.5”

19 Jan 2012

17 58.49

Lat. 01010’18.8”

Long. 109o01’06.4”18 62.24

Lat. 01003’23.7”

Long. 108o58’25.4”23 102

Lat. 00055’02.7”

Long. 108o59’01.0”24 105

- Access to AMP5 Mar 2014

- 30 UKL-UPL Asphalt

Mixing Plant- Base Camp - 28

- Galian C (Quarry)17 Sep 2010

- 30UKL-UPL Quarry

- Pontianak – Sambas road - 27

CW-07: Simpang Tanjung – Galing,

Simpang Tanjung-Aruk (Batas

Sarawak)AMDAL for

Simpang Tanjung-

Aruk- Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 1 road29 Apr 2015

- 72

- Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 2 road - 54



24

Road Section / Sampling PointSampling

DatePM10 TSP

Information

Source

- Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 3 road - 63

- Depan Kantor/Mess 5 Mar 2015 - 22UKL-UPL Asphalt

Mixing Plant

- Quarry area 16 Oct 2014 - 17 UKL-UPL Quarry

North Kalimantan

CW-08: Tanjung Selor - Simpang

Tiga Tanjung Palas, Simpang Tiga

Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji

(Section 1)

- - - -

CW-09: Simpang Tiga Tanjung

Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 2)- - - -

CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas -

Simanggaris (Section -1 & 2)- - - -

CW-11: Simanggaris - Batas Negara

(Serudong)- - - -

20. There are no baseline water quality measurements or results reported in 2015 for the CW

packages in Central and East Java as well as North Kalimantan. However, some water

quality data are available for some CW packages in West Kalimantan, and the results are

presented in Table 6 and interpreted against the water quality standards stipulated in

Government Regulation No. 82 Year 2001 on Water Quality Management and Water

Pollution Control, particularly Class 2 standards typically applied for water recreational

purpose, aqua culture, farming, irrigation, and other water uses required similar standards,

as follows:

• TSS are below the threshold value of 50 mg/L, except for the quarry area of CW-07

which indicates a concentration of around 81.3 mg/L;

• Oil and grease are well below the threshold value of 1 mg/L;

• Turbidity exceed the threshold value of 25 NTU for most locations and these

conditions are typical for water bodies in Kalimantan, which has a vast peatland,

except for the CW-06 AMDAL monitoring station in Sungai Singkawang, the CW-06

and CW-07 UKL-UPL monitoring station at their Asphalt Mixing Plants; and

• pH levels are within the range of 6 – 9 for most locations, except for the quarry area

of CW-07 showing pH of slightly below 6.

Table 6: Baseline River Water Quality Measurements

Location SamplingDate

TSS Oil andGrease

Turbidity pH

Threshold values 50 mg/L 1 mg/L 25 NTU 6 - 9

Central Java

CW-01: Tambak Mulyo - Wawar -



25

Location SamplingDate

TSS Oil andGrease

Turbidity pH

CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet - - - - -

CW-03: Wawar - Congot - - - - -

East Java

CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru - - - - -

West Kalimantan

CW-05: Sosok – Tayan, Tanjung -Batas Kota Sanggau

- Parit area (ditch)1

8 Feb 2015 30 0.15 29 6.28

CW-06: Tebas -SingkawangSection 1 & 2, Sambas Bypass,Galing -Tanjung Harapan2

- Sungai Tebas (Lat. 01013’10.1”Long. 109o08’55.9”)

19 Jan2012

29.2 0.316 55.2 6.05

- Sungai Sebangkau (Lat.0107’49” Long. 108o58’10.9”)

29.5 0.377 54.6 6.38

- Sungai Sebakau (Lat.01003’25.5” Long.108o58’26.9”)

81.3 0.317 58.1 6.37

- Sungai Singkawang (Lat.00055’03.9” Long. 108o59’01.9”

20.4 0.246 11.4 6.54

- Working area3 5 Mar 2014 17 0.22 21 6.26

- Quarry site4 17 Sep 2010 - - - 7.09

CW-07: Simpang Tanjung –Galing, Simpang Tanjung - Aruk5

(Lat. 01038’21.4” Long. 09o37’4.6”)

Apr 2015

38 <0.01 - 6.4

- Sungai Keranji (Lat.01037’27.9” Long.109o37’44.6”)

20 <0.01 - 6.2

- Sungai Sajingan (Lat.01037’11.6” Long. 109o38’27”)

20 <0.01 - 6.2

- PT. Waskita AMP5 5 Mar 2015 13 0.23 0,225 6.5

- Quarry site6 16 Oct 2014 93 0.14 38 5.37

North Kalimantan

CW-08: Tanjung Selor - SimpangTiga Tanjung Palas, SimpangTiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji(Section 1)

- - - - -

CW-09: Simpang Tiga TanjungPalas - Sekatak Buji (Section 2)

- - - - -

CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris (Section -1 & 2)

- - - - -

CW-11: Simanggaris - BatasNegara (Serudong)

- - - - -

Note: 1UKL-UPL Quarry2AMDAL for Tebas -Singkawang Section 1 & 23UKL-UPL Asphalt Mixing Plant for CW-064UKL-UPL Quarry for CW-065PT Waskita asphalt mixing plant6UKL-UPL Quarry for CW-07



26

21. Table 7 indicates that there were no baseline measurements or periodic monitoring

undertaken or reported in 2015 for the CW packages in Central and East Java as well as

North Kalimantan. However, some baseline noise was reported for the CW packages in

West Kalimantan, indicating the noise levels measured are within the standards of 55

dB(A) for residential area and 70 dB(A) for industrial area as prescribed in the Minister of

Environment Decree No. Kep-48/MENLH/11/1996. Slightly higher noise levels were

measured and reported in the CW-06’s AMDAL for Tebas -Singkawang Section 1 & 2

which may be attributed to the sampling station locations which are along the inter-urban

road/highway.

Table 7: Baseline Noise Level Measurements

Location Sampling Date Noise Level [dB(A)]

Ambient noise level standard

Kep-48/1996

70dB(A) for industrial area

55 dB(A) for residential area

Central Java

CW-01: Tambak Mulyo - Wawar - -

CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet - -

CW-03: Wawar - Congot - -

East Java

CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru - -

West Kalimantan

CW-05 - Sosok – Tayan, Tanjung - Batas Kota

Sanggau1

- Tambang Baru (Quarry area)

8 Feb 2015 52.0

CW-06: Tebas -Singkawang (Section 1 & 2)2

- Lat. 01013’37.5”, Long. 109o09’41.5”

19 Jan 2012

72.3 ± 1.12

- Lat. 01010’18.8”, Long. 109o01’06.4” 55.9 ± 1,12

- Lat. 01003’23.7”, Long. 108o58’25.4” 69.2 ± 1,12

- Lat. 00055’02.7”, Long. 108o59’01.0” 72.3 ± 1,12

- Access to the area3

5 Mar 201445.7

- Base Camp Area3 45.5

- Quarry area (Galian C)4

17 Sep 201065.8

- Pontianak – Sambas road4 70.2

CW-07: Simpang Tanjung – Galing, Simpang

Tanjung – Aruk5

29 Apr 2015- Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 1 road 58

- Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 2 road 60

- Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 3 road 53

- Front of the office/Mess6 5 Mar 2015 62.3

- Quarry site/Penambangan7 16 Oct 2014 50.7



27

Location Sampling Date Noise Level [dB(A)]

North Kalimantan

CW-08: Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung

Palas, Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak

Buji (Section 1)

- -

CW-09: Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak

Buji (Section 2)- -

CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris

(Section -1 & 2)- -

CW-11: Simanggaris - Batas Negara (Serudong) - -

Note: 1UKL-UPL for CW-052AMDAL for Tebas -Singkawang Section 1 & 23UKL-UPL Asphalt Mixing Plant for CW-064UKL-UPL Quarry for CW-065PT Waskita asphalt mixing plant6UKL-UPL Quarry for CW-07



28

PART III: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

3.1. Environmental Management Plan (EMP)

22. The EMP containing mitigation measures to be implemented during the construction phase

is defined in Table 20 of the IEE document, which is prepared by the Directorate General

of Highways and approved/issued by ADB in October 2011. Each contractor appointed is

responsible for implementing the EMP within its project-specific areas. Further, the

roles/responsibilities and its status as of 2015 with regard to this EMP implementation is

distributed within a wider organization in Table 23 of the IEE document.

23. The status of the implementation of the EMP responsibilities that should be fulfilled is

presented in: Table 8 for the organizations at the national level; Table 9 for the DSC; and

Table 10 for the contractors. The status is indicated as “Fully Implemented” and “Not

Implemented”. If the status is indicated as “Partially Implemented” it means that efforts

were undertaken to implement the mitigation measures, but the records are incomplete,

hindered by organizational matters, or the responsibility is not specifically stated in the

Terms of Reference/Contract, and these are described in subsequent tables.

Table 8: Status of DGH, SDEA, PMU and CTC on EMP Responsibilities

Agency/Role Responsibilities Status in 2015

Sub-directorate of

Environmental Affairs (SDEA),

now is the Sub-directorate of

Environmental and Road

Safety (SDERS) of the

Directorate of the Road

Network Development (under

the DGH) Environmental –

responsible for environmental

and social monitoring

Set procedures for environmental

management and monitoring based

on GOI and ADB requirements

Fully Implemented

Coordinate with PMU to ensure that

the EMP is implemented properly and

that required monitoring and reporting

are undertaken as required

Partially Implemented

(As per the organizational

structure presented in Figure 3,

there is no direct connection

between the PIU-SDERS and

PMU. Coordination is done at

the level of the Directorate of

the Road Network

Development.)

Provide training to provincial and

District officials on the environmental

and social management system for

road projects

Fully Implemented

(Trainings conducted by the

SDERS may not necessarily be

through the project but is in

performance of their mandate)

Coordinate with BLHD offices at the

District, City, and Provincial Levels

with regard to compliance of the

Project to GOI environmental

requirements

Fully Implemented

Project Management Unit

(PMU) responsible for day-to-

day management and

implementation of the project

Include the EMP in tender and

contract documents

Fully Implemented

Ensure that EMP provisions are

strictly implemented during various

project phases

Fully Implemented

Undertake monitoring of the

implementation of the EMMP

Fully Implemented



29

Agency/Role Responsibilities Status in 2015

(mitigation and monitoring measures)

with assistance from DSC

Ensure that DSC prepared monthly

reports, environmental monitoring

reports for submission to PMU/CTC.

Fully Implemented

With support from CTC, prepare semi-

annual environmental monitoring

reports for submission to ADB

Fully Implemented

Core Team Consultants (CTC)

provides project management

support to PMU with a

representative in each ‘Balai’

office

Prepare semi-annual reports on EMP

implementation (mitigation measures,

establishment of ambient baseline

data baseline, ambient monitoring,

etc.) based on the monthly monitoring

reports submitted by DSC.

The semi-annual environmental

monitoring reports shall be submitted

to ADB through DGH/PMU.

Fully Implemented

Implement the environmental capacity

building/training program proposed in

the IEE.

The training shall be conducted for

SDEA, Office PU, P2JN, and DGH

staff at provincial and district offices,

and environmental staff at the

provincial (Provinsi) and district

(Kabupaten) local governments

through training workshops on ADB’s

environmental safeguards

requirements and international best

practice on environmental

management and monitoring

Fully Implemented

(Not specifically mentioned in

the CTC TOR but training was

conducted for Contractors,

DSC and Satker/PPK)

Develop an environmental auditing

protocol for the construction period for

DSC’s guidance

Not implemented (Not specified

in the CTC TOR)



30

Table 9: Status of the DSC on EMP Responsibilities in 2015

Responsibilities

DSC – 1: CECI

Engineering

Consultants Inc.

–West and North

Kalimantan

DSC – 2: Botek

Bosphorus

Consulting -

Central Java

DCS – 3: PT

Perentjana Djaja

– East Java

Undertake regular monitoring of the

contractor’s implementation of the

environmental mitigation measures

specified in the EMP

Partially

implemented due

to incomplete

records indicating

whether

monitoring of the

EMP has been

regularly

conducted

Partially

implemented due

to incomplete

records indicating

whether

monitoring of the

EMP has been

regularly

conducted

Partially

implemented due

to incomplete

records indicating

whether

monitoring of the

EMP has been

regularly

conducted

Prepare monthly environmental monitoring

reports for submission to DGH/PMU and

CTC.

Such reports shall be the basis for the

semi-annual environmental monitoring

reports to be prepared by CTC for

submission to ADB.

Partially

Implemented as

report submission

was not regularly

submitted

Not Implemented Partially

Implemented as

report submission

was not regularly

submitted

Engage an accredited/licensed laboratory

or institution to undertake establishment

of baseline data on air quality, noise and

surface water quality prior to

commencement of site works based on

the EMMP.

Prepare corresponding reports for

submission to DGH/PMU and CTC.

Not implemented Not implemented Not implemented

Engage an accredited/licensed laboratory

or institution to conduct sampling during

construction phase and in response to

complaints or when there are pollution

events.

Prepare corresponding reports for

submission to DGH/PMU and CTC.


Review and approve the specific

environmental management plans (Dust

Suppression Program, Sewage

Management Plan, Solid Waste

Management Plan) to be prepared by the

contractors as specified in the EMP

Partially

implemented as

not all plans have

been submitted.

Partially

implemented as

not all plans have

been submitted.

Partially

implemented as

not all plans have

been submitted.

Provide on-the-job training to PU Office,

P2JN staff, provincial and district DGH

staff as well as to province and district

environmental staff on monitoring of

contractor’s environmental performance

and preparation of monitoring reports


Supervise civil works to ensure

compliance with the EMP

Partially

implemented as

there is incomplete

record indicating

whether the EMP

Partially

implemented as

there is

incomplete record

indicating whether

the EMP has been

Partially

implemented as

there is

incomplete record

indicating whether

the EMP has been



31

Responsibilities

DSC – 1: CECI

Engineering

Consultants Inc.

–West and North

Kalimantan

DSC – 2: Botek

Bosphorus

Consulting -

Central Java

DCS – 3: PT

Perentjana Djaja

– East Java

has been entirely

implemented

entirely

implemented

entirely

implemented

Recruit an environment, health and safety

manager who will be responsible in

ensuring that environmental mitigation

measures specified in the EMP are

implemented properly


Implement and provide sufficient funding

and human resources for proper and

timely implementation of required

mitigation measures in the EMP


Review and approve environmental

assessment reports required by the

Government.

Partially

implemented as

the record

indicating that

AMDAL, UKL-UPL

and Environmental

Permit for the CW

packages in West

Kalimantan only.

Partially

Implemented as

the record

indicating that

AMDAL, UKL-UPL

and Environmental

Permit available

only for some

AMP and quarries.

Not implemented

as currently no

record indicating

the existence of

AMDAL, UKL-

UPL, and

Environmental

Permit

Undertake monitoring of the project’s

environmental performance based on their

mandate




32

Table 10: Status of the Contractors on EMP Responsibilities

Contractors

Status in 2015

Recruitment of

Environmental, Health and

Safety Manager

Sufficient funding and

human resources

Central Java

CW-01 Tambak Mulyo – Wawar

Contractors: Joint operation of PT

Pembangunan Perumahan and PT Armada

Hada Graha

Fully implemented (Mr

Muhammad Isro)

Fully implemented

CW-02 Giriwoyo - Duwet (Section-1)

Contractor: PT Hutama Karya

Fully implemented

(Mr Siswoyo)

Fully implemented

CW-03 Wawar - Congot

Contractors: PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala

Pratama, Tbk

Fully implemented

(Mr Banon Andoko)

Fully implemented

East Java

CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru

Contractor: PT. Hutama Karya

Fully implemented

(Mr Hardian Yudi)

Fully implemented

West Kalimantan

CW-05: Sosok – Tayan; and Tanjung –

Batas Kota

Contractors: Joint operation of PT Yasa

Patria Perkasa and PT Budi Bakti Prima

Fully implemented

(Mr Julius Manglaia)

Fully implemented

CW-06: Tebas – Singkawang (Section 1 &

2); Sambas Bypass; and Galing – Tanjung

Harapan

Contractors: Joint operation of PT Brantas

Abipraya, PT Tri Citra Perdana and PT Trifa

Abadi

Fully implemented

(Mr Rara Ade Rohmah Sari)

Fully implemented

CW-07: Simpang Tanjung - Galing; Aruk

(Batas Sarawak) – Simpang Tanjung

Contractors: Joint operation PT Waskita

Karya and PT Yala Patria Perkasa

Fully implemented

(Mr Hendrik Prasetio)

Fully implemented

North Kalimantan

CW-08: Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga

Tanjung Palas; and Simpang Tiga Tanjung

Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 1)

Contractor: PT Waskita Karya

Not implemented Not implemented

CW-09: Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas -

Sekatak Buji (Section 2)

Contractors: Joint operation of PT Brantas

Abipraya and PT Mahir Jaya Mahakam Raya


CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas - Simanggaris

(Section1)

Contractors: Joint operation of PT

Pembangunan Perumahan and PT Perdasa




33

Contractors

Status in 2015

Recruitment of

Environmental, Health and

Safety Manager

Sufficient funding and

human resources

CW-11: Simpang Tiga Apas - Simanggaris

(Section 2); and Simanggaris – Batas

Negara (Serudong)

Contractor: Halla Corporation


3.2. Status of Monthly Environmental Report Submission

24. The DSC-1, responsible for the execution of the CW packages in West and North

Kalimantan, started to submit the Monthly Environmental Reports on May 2015 although

the construction work have already started on much earlier dates as shown in Table 11.

construction start date. The DSC-2, responsible for the execution of CW packages in

Central Java did not submit the Monthly Environmental Reports in 2015 notwithstanding

that construction works have already started for several months. The DSC-3, responsible

for the execution of CW packages in East Java did not submit the monthly environmental

reports from 2014 up to April 2015.

Table 11: Detailed Status of Monthly Environmental Report Submissions

PackageConstruction Start

DateDSC Status in 2015

Central Java

CW-01 3 Aug 2015

DSC-2

No report submitted by DSC

CW-02 23 Jul 2015 No report submitted by DSC

CW-03 June 2015 No report submitted by DSC

East Java

CW-04 18 Oct 2013 DSC-3 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015

West Kalimantan

DSC- 1

CW-05 15 Jun 2015 Complete submission for 2015

CW-06 17 Dec 2013 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015


North Kalimantan


CW-09 4 Sep 2014 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015

CW-10 10 Jul 2014 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015

CW-11 1 Oct 2014 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015



34

3.3. Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures

25. The status of environmental mitigation measures implemented by the RRDP contractors

as required by the EMP are summarized in Appendix A. The information presented in this

table is based on the monthly environmental monitoring reports submitted by the DSC. It

is noted that these monthly reports are not regularly submitted by the DSC to CTC. Where

complete information is not available due to the significant absence of monthly

environmental reports, the implementation of the mitigation measures is therefore

considered “Not implemented.” Appendix B presents the environmental baseline and

monitoring results available for the CW construction packages in West Kalimantan. No

similar results were reported for those in Central and East Java as well as North

Kalimantan. Appendix C presents the photographs undertaken at the time of the Project

Mission and/or CTC site visit.

3.4. ADB Review Missions and CTC Site Inspections

26. ADB Project Review Missions with the participation of the CTC were undertaken to review

the implementation of the overall projects and progress as well as environmental

mitigation. The ADB Midterm Review Mission was undertaken from 23 September to 11

November 2014 and the ADB Project Review Mission from 15 September to 12 November

2015. CTC site inspections were also conducted independently in 2014 to assess the

implementation of environmental mitigation measures and monitoring undertaken by the

Contractors associated with the implementation of the eleven (11) RRDP’s construction

packages. No CTC site visits were done in 2015 as its Environmental Specialist have

resigned and have not been replaced in that year. Table 12 present the ADB Missions and

CTC visits undertaken in 2015

27. The outcomes and notes resulting from the mentioned missions and site visits that require

corrective actions and follow-ups are recorded and summarized in Tables 13 and 14.

Table 12: ADB Review Mission and CTC Inspection

Package No. Mission/Inspection Date

Central Java

CW-01: Tambak Mulyo – Wawar ADB Project Review Mission 2015

CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet (Section-1) ADB Project Review Mission 2015

CW-03: Wawar - Congot ADB Project Review Mission 2015

East Java

CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014

ADB Project Review Mission 2015

CTC Site Visit (12 – 14 May 2014)

West Kalimantan

CW-05:

• Sosok – Tayan

• Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau

ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014


CW-06: CTC Site Visit (19 – 22 May 2014)



35

Package No. Mission/Inspection Date

• Singkawang overlay

• Tebas - Singkawang (Section 1 & 2)

• Sambas Bypass

• Galing - Tanjung Harapan

CTC Site Visit (16 – 20 September 2014)



CW-07:

• Simpang Tanjung - Galing

• Aruk (Batas Sarawak) -Simpang Tanjung

CTC Site Inspection (19 – 22 May 2014)

CTC Site Visit (16 – 20 September 2014)



North Kalimantan

CW-08:

• Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas

• Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji

(Section 1

CTC Site Visit

(10 – 14 November 2014)



CW-09:

• Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji

(Section2)

CTC Site Visit

(10 – 14 November 2014)



CW-10:

• Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris (Section-1)

• Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris (Section-2)

CTC Site Visit

(10 – 14 November 2014)



CW-11:

Simanggaris - Batas Negara (Serudong)

CTC Site Visit

(10 – 14 November 2014)



3.5. Non-compliances and Corrective Action Plans

28. The status of the non-compliances and corrective action plans, both immediate and long-

term (preventive) and due dates, as identified based on the ADB Review Missions and

CTC site inspection, are shown in Table 13. Non-compliances that require immediate

action have already been addressed. This will have to go through the review and approval

process of the GOI and ADB.



36

Table 13: Non-Compliances and Corrective/Preventive Actions Identified in 2015

Mission/

Inspection

Date

Description of

Non-ComplianceProject Package/Location

Immediate

Corrective

Action/s

Status

Long Term

Preventive

Action/s

Due Date Status

September

- December

2015

Landslide prone

areas at the

specified locations.

East Java

• CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru on

STA 18 and STA 19 + 600 (right)

West Kalimantan

• CW-05: Sosok – Tayan on STA

33+850, STA 32+800, STA 32+500,

• CW-05: Sp Tanjung Bts Kota Sanggau

on STA 30+500, STA 29+200, STA

28+100, STA 20+200 and STA 13+200

• CW-07: Galing – Simpang Tanjung) on

STA 26+575, STA 28+325, STA

28+550 and STA 29+235 STA 33+850,

STA 32+800, STA 32+500, STA

30+500

North Kalimantan

• CW-08: Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji

(Section 1) on STA 16+000 – 16+60


(Section 2) on Pimping village

• CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas –

Simanggaris


Simanggaris, Simanggaris Batas

Negara

Put appropriate

traffic signs to warn

motorists.

Implemented for all

specified locations

The Contractor to

reassess the slope

protection

measures and

redesign if

necessary for

approval by the

DSC and DGH.

April 2016 To be

reported in

2016



37

Mission/

Inspection

Date

Description of


Immediate

Corrective

Action/s

Status

Long Term

Preventive

Action/s

Due Date Status

September

- December

2015

A considerable

number of unused

asphalt contained

in drums are

leaking asphalt to

the soil.

East Java

• CW-04 AMP

West Kalimantan

• CW-05 AMP

• CW-06 AMP

• CW-07 AMP

DSC to advise

Contractors to

store asphalt

drums in one

location with

impermeable

flooring.

Not implemented Prepare Action

Plan for Asphalt

Drum Handling and

Spilled Asphalt

Disposal.

April 2016 To be

reported in

2016

September

- December

2015

Dusty conditions

from ongoing road

works and

movement of trucks

and heavy

equipment

Central Java

• CW-01: Tambak Mulyo – Wawar

• CW-02: Wonogiri – Duwet

• CW-03: Wawar – Congot

East Java

• CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru

West Kalimantan

• CW-05: Sosok – Tayan, Simpang

Tanjung – Batas Kota Sanggau,

• CW-06: Singkawang – Tebas (Section

1 and Section 2), Sambas – Tanjung

Harapan, Tanjung Harapan –Galing

• CW-07: Galing – Simpang Tanjung

North Kalimantan

• CW-08: Tanjung Selor – Sekatak Buji

(Section 1)


(Section 2)


Simanggaris (Section1)

• Increase

monitoring

frequency from

spot checks to

constant visual

monitoring

• Increase

watering

frequency from

once a day to

twice daily at the

minimum with

standby water

trucks especially

during hot days.

• Prioritize

watering

activities in

sensitive areas

(e.g. schools,

religious places,

commercial and

residential areas)

Implemented for all

specified locations

(ongoing)

- - -



38

Mission/

Inspection

Date

Description of


Immediate

Corrective

Action/s

Status

Long Term

Preventive

Action/s

Due Date Status


Simanggaris (Section 2), Simanggaris –

Serudong /Batas Negara

September

- December

2015

Drainage

construction works

has caused traffic.

No traffic signs

installed.

East Java

CW-04 at STA 2 + 150 - STA 2 + 225

Install the

appropriate traffic

signs

Implemented - - -

September

- December

2015

Not enough lighting

at the bridge

construction work

site.

East Java

CW-04: On the bridge at Wonogiri

• Install sufficient

lighting to

illuminate and

warn on the road

hazards at the

bridge

• Install

appropriate

traffic/warning

signs

Implemented - - -

September

- December

2015

Obstruction at the

box culvert which

obstructs water

flow and can be

cause of overflow

to the asphalt

pavement.

East Java

CW-04: Box Culvert in STA 2 + 275

covered mounds of earth so that during

heavy rains the water can flow to the

asphalt surface and box culvert not

functioning properly.

Remove

obstruction to allow

the free flow of

water at the box

culvert.

Implemented - - -

September

- December

2015

No traffic road

block/sign at an

intersection where

works are ongoing,

causing confusion

to motorists

East Java

CW-04: Intersection at the STA 00 + 000

Install appropriate

road blocks and

warning signs

Implemented - - -



39

Mission/

Inspection

Date

Description of


Immediate

Corrective

Action/s

Status

Long Term

Preventive

Action/s

Due Date Status

September

- December

2015

No traffic signs

installed to warn

that works are

ongoing

East Java

CW-04: Along alignment of Jolosutro –

Sendangbiru

Install appropriate

warning signs

Implemented - - -

September

- December

2015

Accumulation of

water at the

intersection of two

downward slopes

(basin).

East Java

• CW-04: Between STA 00 + 250 to STA

00 + 300

• CW-04: In the STA 00 + 325, STA 1 +

850, 2 + 800, 21 + 297

• CW-04: STA 02+200

Temporarily divert

the flow of water

Implemented for all

locations

The Contractor to

reassess the road

design and

redesign if

necessary for

approval by the

DSC and DGH.

April 2016 To be

reported in

2016

March-

August

2015

Dusty conditions

from ongoing road

works and

movement of trucks

and heavy

equipment

East Java

• CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru -

STA 15 + 800 to STA16 + 050

West Kalimantan

• CW-05: Sosok – Tayan, Simpang

Tanjung – Batas Kota Sanggau

• CW-06: Singkawang – Tebas (Section

1 and Section 2), Sambas – Tanjung

Harapan, Tanjung Harapan –Galing


North Kalimantan


(Section 1), Tanjung Palas – Sekatak

Buji (Section 2)


(Section 2)

• CW-10: Simpang 3 Apas –


• Increase

monitoring

frequency from

spot checks to

constant visual

monitoring

• Increase

watering

frequency from

once a day to

twice daily at the

minimum with

standby water

trucks especially

during hot days

• Prioritize

watering

activities in

sensitive areas

(e.g. schools,

religious places,

Implemented for all

locations (ongoing)

- - -



40

Mission/

Inspection

Date

Description of


Immediate

Corrective

Action/s

Status

Long Term

Preventive

Action/s

Due Date Status




commercial and

residential areas)

March-

August

2015

The relocation of

21 electricity poles

which will be

affected by the

excavation works

has not yet been

implemented

East Java

CW-04 - Jolosutro – Sendangbiru

• Implement the

relocation of the

poles in

coordination with

the concerned

agencies,

institutions and

local residents

Implemented - - -

September

2014 -

February

2015

Dusty conditions

from ongoing road

works and

movement of trucks

and heavy

equipment

East Java


West Kalimantan

• CW-06: Singkawang – Tebas (Sections

1 and 2), Sambas – Tanjung Harapan,

Tanjung Harapan – Galing


North Kalimantan


(Section 1), Tanjung Palas – Sekatak

Buji (Section 2)

• CW-08 and CW-09: Tanjung Selor -

Simpang 3 Tanjung Palas - Sekatak

Buji segments


(Section 2)



• Increase

monitoring

frequency from

spot checks to

constant visual

monitoring

• Increase

watering

frequency from

once a day to

twice daily at the

minimum with

standby water

trucks especially

during hot days.

• Prioritize

watering

activities in

sensitive areas

(e.g. schools,

religious places,

Implemented on all

locations (ongoing)

- - -



41

Mission/

Inspection

Date

Description of


Immediate

Corrective

Action/s

Status

Long Term

Preventive

Action/s

Due Date Status




commercial and

residential areas)

March-

August

2014

Drainage

construction work

is temporarily

stopped resulting to

exposed

embankment

East Java


West Kalimantan

• CW-06: Singkawang – Tebas (Sections

1 and 2), Sambas – Tanjung Harapan,

Tanjung Harapan –Galing


• Install

appropriate

warning signs

• Resume

construction

work

immediately

Implemented on all

locations (ongoing)

- - -



42

3.6. Public Consultations

29. The Public Consultations with the affected stakeholders were conducted between

September 2008 to August 2011 during the project preparation for the different project

work packages of the RRDP. The outcomes of this Public Consultations are documented

in the IEE document.

30. No formal public consultation or public meeting associated with RRDP was reported in the

DSC’s monthly reports submitted for the period of January to December 2015. However,

as per information verbally conveyed by the Contractors, informal talks between the

employees of the contractors and local communities on general matters of concern relative

to RRDP implementation were conducted, but not documented.

3.7. Public Complaints/Grievances and Resolutions

31. Five (5) complaints from the local community were registered in 2015. These complaints

were directly related to the ongoing construction activities in West Kalimantan and East

Java as presented in Table 14. These complaints have been followed up and the

corresponding status is presented in the following table.

Table 14: Complaints/ Grievances Recorded in 2015

Date Package Complaints Action Required Status

West Kalimantan

June 2015 CW-06: Tebas –

Singkawang

(near the junior

high school/SMP

4 Singkawang

Dust pollution Constant monitoring

and prompt watering

when high dust level

is observed

Completed, and the

action is undertaken

as ongoing effort.

Garbage Maintain cleanliness

onsite and provide

trash bags/cans

Completed, and the


as ongoing effort.

Improvement of traffic

signs

Install appropriate

traffic signs

Completed, and the

traffic signs installed

CW-06: Tebas –

Singkawang

Flow of mud into the

road due to

embankment caused

by the ongoing

drainage works

Install barriers to

prevent flow of mud

to the road while

waiting for collection

trucks

Completed, and the


as ongoing effort.

Prompt collections

of excavation waste

materials

Completed, and the


as ongoing effort.

East Java

September

2015

CW-04: Jolosutro

– Sendangbiru at

STA 1+833 and

STA 2+000

Request of villagers to

reinstall the removed

culverts as soon as

possible to discharge

water into the cave

that serves as drain

and water sources for

Hamlet Sendangbiru

Schedule as soon

as possible the

installation of

culverts/drain

Completed



43

32. The role of the local community is very important during the implementation of project

activities. Hence, the village heads are expected to be well informed and involved in the

monitoring of the implementation of the environmental mitigation measures and respective

monitoring. Any complaints and/or grievances should be reported to the Head of the

Village for resolution. If the grievance/complaint is not resolved at the level of the Village

Head, the same will be forwarded to the Implementation Unit (PIU)/PPK. The DSC through

the Environment and/or Resettlement Engineer will assist the PIU/PPK to resolve the

grievance/complaint. If it is still not resolved at the level of the PIU/PPK, the

grievance/complaint will then be referred to the Balai (Regional Implementing Agency),

which will be assisted by the respective DSC, Kasatker and PPK for final resolution. This

grievance redress mechanism is show in Figure 8.

Figure 8: Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM)



44

PART IV: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1. Conclusions

33. This AEMR 2015 of the RRDP is compiled for the submission to ADB. This AEMR presents

the status of environmental monitoring and mitigation measures (as specified in the IEE)

undertaken by the contractors and DSCs working for the Regional Roads Development

Project in Central and East Java as well as West and North Kalimantan in 2015. The

conclusions drawn from this AEMR are presented in the following.

34. The AMDAL and UKL-UPL approvals and/or Environmental Permits as the GOI’s

mandatory requirements exist for the road construction in Central Java, West and North

Kalimantan. However, there are no records indicating that this environmental approval and

permit exist for the CW-04 road construction (East Java) and for parts of the CW-06 road

construction (West Kalimantan), and therefore confirmation with this regard is required.

35. The UKL-UPL approvals and/or Environmental Permits have been secured for some

asphalt mixing plants and quarries/borrow pits operated by the contractors/sub-contractors

working for the road construction in West Kalimantan and Central Java. However, there

are no records indicating that this environmental approval and permit exist for the

mentioned facilities operated for the road construction in North Kalimantan and East Java.

36. The proposed addition of the 12.3 km Sambas - Tanjung Harapan road section, located in

Sambas District of West Kalimantan Province, requires the preparation of a new

environmental approval and permit. The road design was being undertaken, and therefore

the preparation of the environmental approval and permit had not been confirmed in 2015.

37. Baseline environmental sampling and periodic environmental monitoring during the

construction phase, as required by the IEE, have not been conducted by the DSCs due to

the absence of their respective Environmental Specialist at that time.

38. The conduct of environmental monitoring, as specified in the IEE, has been partial by the

DSCs due the absence of their respective Environmental Specialist and incomplete

record/monthly reports indicating whether the monitoring has been regularly conducted

and the results reported. The inability to submit the required Monthly Environmental

Reports can be attributed to the failure of some of the Contractors and the DSC to hire

their Environmental Officers.

39. Most of the responsibilities of the Directorate General of Highways, SDEA, Project

Management Unit, and Core Team Consultants to implement the EMP have been

undertaken. Only few of them are either not yet implemented or partially implemented due

to changes in the RRDP organization and some scope of works not defined in the

ToR/Contract.

40. There are considerable gaps reported for the DSCs and their respective contractors in

fulfilling their responsibilities on the EMP due to the absence of their respective

environmental specialists/officers and incomplete records indicating whether the

implementation of the EMP responsibilities have been undertaken.

41. ADB Project Review Missions were conducted in 2014 and 2015 to review the

implementation and progress of the RRDP. CTC accompanied the Missions and



45

conducted its own inspections in 2014. CTC did not undertake the site inspection in 2015

as its Environmental Specialist resigned in that year. Non-conformances and

corresponding corrective actions were identified and followed up for those requiring

immediate actions. Some corrective actions are implemented as ongoing activity as part

of the construction activity.

42. Five (5) community complaints were reported and followed up in 2015 and these related

to the construction activities in West Kalimantan and East Java. The complaints were

associated with airborne dust, garbage, Improvement of traffic signs, mud overflow onto

the road, and request of villagers to reinstall the removed culverts. No community

grievance redress mechanism was reported for 2015

4.2. Recommendations

43. Based on the aforementioned conclusions of the 2015 AEMR report, the following

recommendations are presented in this report.

44. The absence of AMDAL and UKL-UPL approval as well as Environmental Permit for the

road construction works, asphalt mixing plants and quarries/borrow pits identified in this

report should be confirmed in the next reporting.

45. The conduct of monitoring for ambient air quality, surface water quality and noise level as

required in the IEE of RRDP should be prioritized by the DSCs to enable assessment of

the impact of the ongoing works on the quality of the environment. This is applicable for

those work packages with baseline data. For work packages without baseline data, the

results can be compared with the statutory standards.

46. The DSCs should immediately hire their respective Environmental Specialists to undertake

their obligations for an informed and consistent implementation of the environmental

monitoring and mitigation measures as well as submitting the monthly environmental

monitoring report in a regular and timely manner; and the DSC should improve supervision

of the Contractors on strictly implementation of the mitigation measures.

47. The DSC should monitor compliance of the Contractors to government requirements for

the UKL-UPL of the asphalt mixing plants and quarries to be included in the Monthly

Environmental Reports as well as for the AMDAL of some road sections.

48. The Contractors should be consistent in implementing mitigation measures and

conducting regular orientation for the workers on good housekeeping practices, especially

in the asphalt mixing plants.

49. The Monthly Environmental Reports, submitted by the DSC to PMU and CTC, should not

only contain the DGH’s checklist of environmental mitigation and monitoring, but also

updates on the following:

• recent status of immediate corrective actions taken to observed non-compliances and

the status of action plans for non-compliances with long term preventive actions

taking into consideration the due dates indicated;

• the existence of the AMDAL and UKL-UPL approvals as well as Environmental

Permits that have not been identified for the work packages in East Java, West and



46

North Kalimantan;

• develop notes/documentation on meetings and consultations with stakeholders

including courtesy calls and informal discussions with Village Chiefs and/or the local

government and other stakeholders and government offices; and

• properly document any complaints and grievances including follow-up actions.

Implementation of Environmental Mitigating Measures –

Construction Phase

APPENDI X A

Issue / PotentialImpact

Mitigation measuresDSC3 DSC-1

CW -04 CW-05 CW-06 CW-07 CW-08 CW-09 CW-10 CW-11

1. Soil and Material

Issue:

Utilization of

productive land

Potential impact:

Loss of fertility of

arable land

(i) At construction sites and other areas affected by project

activities, the topsoil (about 15 cm) will be kept and refilled after

excavation is over to minimize the impact on productive lands.

F F F F F F F F

(ii) It may be necessary to construct new access roads to aggregate

sites, and place them through agricultural lands. These

temporary roads will be made along existing farm tracks so as to

avoid losses to agricultural lands.

F F F F F F F F

(iii) Contractors shall present proposed construction road alignments

and hauling schedule for approval by the DSC before

construction is to commence.F F F F F F F F

(iv) In unavoidable circumstances, suitable compensation will be paid

to people whose land will be temporarily acquired for the duration

of the operations. The compensation will cover for loss of income

for the duration of acquisition and land restoration.

F F F F F F F F

(v) Contractors shall avoid as much as possible, usage of productive

agricultural land. If such land is used, the contractor shall restore

them to their original state after completion of civil works.F F F F F F F F

Issue:

Reclaimedpavement

Potential impact:

Generation ofspoils/solid waste

(i) Contractors will be encouraged to recycle reclaimed asphalt

pavement in cold mixes or aggregate in granular or stabilized

surface material for subgrade and base layers and village access

road maintenance and to use recyclable materials as much as

possible. The material that cannot be reused will be taken to

specific official waste dumping sites approved by the Bapedalda.

N N N N N N N N

(ii) All suitable material obtained from roadway excavation work will

be used for construction of embankment/ earthen shoulders. P F F F F F F

Appendix A: Implementation of Environmental Mitigation Measures – Construction

Phase ( “F” – Fully Implemented “P” – Partially Implemented “N” – Not Implemented )

Issue:

Soil erosion

Potential impact:High suspendedsolid contents ofriver, sedimentation.

(i) Erosion control and slope stabilization measures shall be

provided such as: (a) side ditches and berms, rock lining and

slope walls along the road, where appropriate. (b) proper

drainage system (c) shrub buffer strips sites in areas of high

erosion risk (d) cross drainage to accommodate floodwater/run-

off in case subproject roads are on elevated fills that will obstruct

natural drainage.

F N F F F F F F

(ii) On hill slopes and other potentially erodible places along the

roadside, appropriate vegetation that retards erosion will be

planted.F F F F F F F F

(iii) On sections with filling and cutting, the slopes will be protected by

mild slope and planted with appropriate vegetation.N N N N N N N N

(iv) As much as possible, construction activities in hilly areas are to

be undertaken during dry season only.N N N N N N N N

Issue:

Spoils Disposal andstockpiling ofconstructionmaterials

Potential impact:

Damage toproductive land,deterioration ofwater quality andobstruction ofwatercourses

(i) Spoils shall only be disposed to areas approved by local

authority.F F N N N N N N

(ii) Spoil disposal shall not cause sedimentation and obstruction of

flow of watercourses, damage to agricultural land and densely

vegetated areas.F F N N N N N N

(iii) The spoils disposal site shall be located at least 50 m from

surface water courses and shall be protected from erosion by

avoiding formation of steep slopes and grassing.F F N N N N N N

(iv) Water courses (rivers, canals, etc.) shall be kept free of

excavation spoil and construction debris, floating and submerged.N N N N N N N N

(v) Spoil and construction materials stockpile area shall be located

away from waterbodies and under no circumstances will these

materials be dumped into watercourses.N N N N N N N N

Issue:

Slope Stability

Potential impact:

(i) A balanced cut and fill approach will be designed for each road

link. Excess cut, if any, will be used to shape the embankment

side slopes, strengthening the toe of the high slopes road bench

and filling the low lying public lands and for plantation in pre-

approved areas.

N N N N N N N N

Erosion andlandslides

(ii) Embankments shall be monitored during construction for signs of

erosion; long-term material stockpiles will be covered to prevent

wind erosion.N N N N N N N N

(iii) Retaining structures will be constructed for protection of slopes

from landslides and existing vegetation cover shall be left

undisturbed during construction whenever possible.N N N N N N N N

(iv) Removal of vegetation and cutting of trees will be done

judiciously and limited to minimum possible extent.N N N N N N N N

(v) Vegetative cover shall be provided on slopes by planting grass

and creepers on erosion and landslide prone sections.N N N N N N N N

(vi) To the extent feasible, the length and steepness of cut and fill

slopes will be minimized particularly at borrow, quarry and spoil

sites.N N N N N N N N

(vii) Silt dikes and runoff ditches will be installed where appropriate to

prevent silt from entering farmland and water bodies.N N N N N N N N

2. Water

Issue:

Construction ofbridges/drainagestructures instreams/rivers

Potential impact:

Flood, inundation,mudflow, pollution,and adverse effectson runoff flowpattern

(i) Drainage works shall be constructed as designed based on the

historical flood data and flood forecasting.N N N N N N N N

(ii) Ensure bridge works shall not cause obstruction of river flow and

flooding of adjacent area.N N N N N N N N

(iii) In sections along rivers and streams, earth and stones will be

properly disposed of so that they do not block rivers and streams,

resulting in adverse impact on water quality and flow regime.N N N N N N N N

(iv) Slope stabilization measures (e.g., planting of fast growing native

species of grass and shrubs, etc.) shall be implemented on

exposed surfaces along river embankments to reduce material

wash-away material.

N N N N N N N N

(v) Cofferdams, silt fences, sediment barriers or other appropriate

devices shall be provided during bridge works to prevent

migration of silt during excavation and boring operations within

streams. Dewatering and cleaning of cofferdams will be

performed to prevent siltation by pumping from cofferdams to a

N N N N N N N N

settling basin or a containment unit.

(vi) In bridge demolition sites, efforts will be made to avoid "dropping

the bridge" into rivers/streams. This will be done by "sawing"

appropriate sections of the bridge and using cranes to lift these

sections away, or alternatively by construction of a platform onto

which the bridge could be dropped.

N N N N N N N N

Issue: Siltation

Potential impact:

Deterioration ofsurface water quality

(i) Provide slope stabilization measures on exposed surfaces by

planting grass and creepers and implementation of other suitable

measures to reduce washing away of materials.N N N N N N N N

(ii) Construction materials containing fine particles, e.g. limestone or

laterite, shall be stored in an enclosure such that sediment laden

water does not drain into nearby watercourses, but rather

percolates slowly into the soil.

N N N N N N N N

(iii) Sediment laden construction water will be discharged into settling

lagoons or tanks prior to final discharge.N N N N N N N N

(iv) Construct retaining structures such as gabion baskets, rip-rap,

etc. for river bank protection.N N N N N N N N

Issue:

Spills from BitumenPlants

Potential impact:

Contamination ofwater table orsurface drainage –could come fromspilled bitumen orpetroleum productsused to thin thebitumen. Bitumen isstored in drumswhich may leak orwhich are oftenpunctured duringhandling after longperiods (> 6 months

(i) Bitumen shall not be allowed to enter either running or dry

streambeds and nor will be disposed of in ditches or small waste

disposal sites prepared by the contractor.P F F P P P P P

(ii) Bitumen storage and mixing areas as well as storage areas for

other petroleum products used in the preparation of the bitumen

mixture shall be protected against spills and all contaminated soil

must be properly handled according to national and local

regulations. As a minimum, these areas must be provided with

concrete flooring and surrounded by an embankment to readily

contain and clean-up spills.P F F P P P P P

in the elements) ofstorage.

3. Air, Noise, andVibration

Issue:

Air pollution

Potential impact:

Gaseous and dustemissions causinghealth hazard toworkers and nearbyresidents.

(i) The contractor will submit a dust suppression program prior to

construction. The plan will detail action to be taken to minimize

dust generation including specific locations, schedule, etc. (e.g.,

spraying of roads with water, vegetation cover in borrow sites),

and will identify equipment to be used.

F F F F F F F

(ii) Construction equipment will be maintained to a good standard

and idling of engines will be discouraged. Machinery causing

excessive pollution (e.g., visible smoke) will be banned from

construction sites.

F F F F F F F F

(iii) All construction equipment and vehicles shall have valid

certifications indicating compliance to vehicle emission

standards.F F F F F F F F

(iv) Siting of asphalt plants will be more than 1 km of settlements and

other sensitive receptors (schools, hospitals, etc.)F F F F F F F F

(v) Necessary environmental clearance shall be obtained prior to

establishment and operation of asphalt mixing plants. N N N N N N N N

(vi) On rainless day undertake watering, at least twice per day, on

dusty and exposed areas at construction yards, materials

stockpile, construction sites, access roads, quarry areas, borrow

sites and other project areas where residential sites and other

sensitive receptors are located nearby.

F F F F F F F F

(vii) Mixing and crushing plants/operations will be equipped with dust

suppression devices such as water sprays. Operators will wear

dust masks and ear protection.F F F F F F F F

(viii)Tightly cover trucks transporting construction materials (sand,

soil, cement, gravel, etc.) to avoid or minimize spills and dust

emission.F F F P P P P P

(ix) Impose speed limits on construction vehicles to minimize dust

emission along areas where sensitive receptors are located

(houses, schools, hospitals, etc.).F F F F F F F F

Issue:

Noise and vibrationfrom constructionactivities

Potential impact:

Disturbance/

nuisance tosettlements andother sensitivereceptors.

(i) As much as possible, locate high vibration generation sources

over 50m from residential sites and other structures.N N N N N N N N

(ii) Regularly maintain and repair construction machinery and

vehicles to keep these in good condition.F F F F F F F F

(iii) Noisy construction activities shall be stopped from 21:00 to 06:00

in areas where sensitive receptors such as settlements, hospital,

etc. will be affected.F F F F F F F F

(iv) Inspection will be done before construction equipment enter into

construction sites to ensure that these are in good condition and

are fitted with suitable noise suppression devices.P P P P P P P P

(v) Impose speed limits on construction vehicles to minimize noise

emission along areas where sensitive receptors are located

(houses, schools, hospitals, etc.).F F F F F F F F

(vi) Install noise control walls (3.0 - 4.5m high, thick materials) at high

noise sources that affect sensitive receptors (hospital, schools,

etc.).N N N N N N N N

(vii) Provide workers near sources of loud noise with protection

devices such as ear plugs.N N N N N N N N

Issue:

Rock blasting

Potential impact:

Explosion and noise

(i) Blasting will be carried out only with permission of Bapedalda and

other concerned agencies, using a pre-established schedule.N N N N N N N N

(ii) All the statutory laws, regulation, rules etc., pertaining to

acquisition, transport, storage, handling and use of explosives will

be strictly followed.N N N N N N N N

(iii) The timing will be made available to the local people within 500m

of the blasting site in all directions, depending on the total charge

used.N N N N N N N N

(iv) Blasting will be held only during day time and shall be carried out

not using high powered explosives.N N N N N N N N

(v) W here possible blasting mats will be used to reduce noise levels

when blasting is carried out.N N N N N N N N

4. Quarry andBorrow Sites

N N N N N N N

Issue:

Operation of quarryand borrow areas

Potential impact:

Loss of topsoil anddisfigurement oflandscape, dust andair pollution, healthand safety risks

(i) The maximum gradient after refurbishment of each borrow/quarry

slope shall not exceed as average value 1:3. After implementing

terraces and drainage system, vegetation cover shall be provided

by seeding grass and planting both bushes and trees.

N N N N N N N N

(ii) Upon completion of extraction activities, quarry and borrow pits

shall be dewatered and fences shall be installed, as appropriate,

to minimize health and safety risks.N N N N N N N N

(iii) Quarry areas and borrow pits will be left in a tidy state with stable

side slopes and proper drainage in order to avoid erosionN N N N N N N N

(iv) To avoid drowning when pits become water-filled, measures such

as fencing, providing flotation devices such as a buoy tied to a

rope, etc. shall be implemented.N N N N N N N N

5. HazardousSubstances Waste

Issue:

Storage ofhydrocarbon, toxic,and explosivechemicals

Potential impact:

Contamination fromharmful and toxicchemicals (paints,fuel and lubricants,oils and explosives).

(i) Hydrocarbon, toxic material and explosives will be stored in

designated sites. Vehicle maintenance and refueling will be

confined to areas in construction sites designed to contain spilled

lubricants and fuels.

F F F F F F F F

(ii) Spill waste will be disposed at approved disposal sites. F F F F F F F F

(iii) Adequate precaution will be taken to prevent

oil/lubricant/hydrocarbon contamination of channel beds. Spillage

if any will be immediately cleared with utmost caution to leave no

traces.

F F F F F F F F

(iv) All areas intended for storage of hazardous materials will be

quarantined and provided with adequate facilities to combat

emergency situations complying with all the applicable statutory

F F F F F F F F

stipulation.

(v) The personnel in-charge of these sites will be properly trained

and these areas will be access controlled and entry will be

allowed only under authorization.F F F F F F F F

(vi) Store fuel and hazardous substances in paved areas with roof

and embankment. If spills or leaks do occur, undertake

immediate clean up.F F F F F F F F

(vii) Ensure availability of spill clean-up materials (e.g., absorbent

pads, etc.) specifically designed for petroleum products and other

hazardous substances where such materials are being stored.F F F F F F F F

(viii)Segregate hazardous wastes (oily wastes, used batteries, fuel

drums) and ensure that storage, transport and disposal shall not

cause pollution and shall be undertaken consistent with national

and local regulations.

F F F F F F F F

(ix) Ensure all storage containers are in good condition with proper

labeling.F F F F F F F F

(x) Regularly check containers for leakage and undertake necessary

repair or replacement.F F F F F F F F

(xi) Store hazardous materials above flood level. F F F F F F F F

(xii) Equipment maintenance and refueling areas shall be provided

with drainage leading to an oil-water separator that will be

regularly skimmed of oil and maintained to ensure efficiency.F F F F F F F F

(xiii)Discharge of oil contaminated water shall be prohibited. F F F F F F F F

Issue:

Solid waste fromcontractor’s yardand constructioncamps

Potential impact:

Contamination fromsolid waste

(i) Solid wastes/garbage will be collected in bins and disposed ofregularly to sites approved or licensed by local authorities,according to a brief and basic waste management plan preparedby the contractor and approved by DSC, prior to thecommencement of civil works.

F F F F F F F F

(ii) Prohibit burning of construction and domestic wastes. F F F F F F F F

(iii) Do not permit disposal of solid wastes into canals, rivers, otherwatercourses, agricultural field and public areas. Disposal shallonly be to areas approved/licensed by local authorities.

F F F F F F F F

(iv) Properly collect and segregate solid wastes at worker campsand construction sites. Use rubbish bins for containing domesticsolid wastes

F F F F F F F F

(v) Segregate reusable and recyclable wastes. F F F F F F F F

(vi) All worn out parts, equipment and empty containers ofhazardous substances (oil, paint, lubricant, bitumen, etc.) mustbe removed from the site to a proper storage locationdesignated by PMU/DSC.

F F F F F F F F

(vii) There will be no site-specific landfills established by thecontractors. All solid waste will be collected and removed fromthe work camps and disposed in local waste disposal sites.

F F F F F F F F

6. EcologicalEnvironment

Issue:

Flora

Potential impact:

Damage tovegetation

(i) A tree-cutting and replanting scheme will be prepared within the

first four months of the start of civil works to compensate for

cleared areas during construction.N N N N N N N N

(ii) Orientation will be provided to the workers on proper

implementation of mitigation measures to protect the

environment.N N N N N N N N

(iii) The contractor shall prohibit cutting of trees for firewood and for

use in for construction-related activitiesN N N N N N N N

(iv) Vegetative cover (e.g., grasses and shrubs) stripped from the

construction sites will be used for landslide and slope protection.N N N N N N N N

(v) Construction vehicles will operate within the corridor of impact,

i.e., approximately within ROW, to avoid damaging soil and

vegetation. It will be most important to avoid soil compaction

around trees. Generally, the rule will be to avoid driving heavy

equipment or trucks anywhere into the ’drip-line’ of a tree (defined

as imaginary line around a tree where rainwater falls freely to

ground unimpeded by the tree’s foliage).

N N N N N N N N

(vi) No trees will be removed without prior approval of Bapedalda. N N N N N N N N

(vii) The contractor will not use or permit the use of wood as a fuel for

the execution of any part of the Works, including but not limited to

the heating of bitumen and bitumen mixtures, and to the extent

N N N N N N N N

practicable shall ensure that fuels other than wood are used for

cooking, and water heating in all his camps and living

accommodations

(viii)Contractor shall not buy or use wood from the illegal sources

(that come from the illegal logging)N N N N N N N N

(ix) No construction camps, asphalt mixing plants, material storage

sites are to be located in the forest areas.N N N N N N N N

(x) Contractor will take all precautions necessary to ensure that

damage to vegetation is avoided due to fires resulting from

execution of the works. The Contractor will immediately suppress

the fire, if it occurs, and shall undertake replanting to replace

damaged vegetation.

N N N N N N N N

Issue:

Fauna

Potential impact:

Impact on Fauna

(i) Workers shall be prohibited from hunting wild animals. N N N N N N N N

(ii) As much as possible, bridge works will be scheduled in dry

season to minimize adverse impacts to fishery, river water quality

and other aquatic resources.N N N N N N N N

APPENDIX B

Air Quality, Water Quality and Noise Level

Monitoring Data

Air Quality and Noise Level

AMDAL CW-06: Tebas-Singkawang Section 1 and Section 2

AMDAL CW-06 Tebas-Singkawang Section 1 and Section 2




UKL-UPL CW-05 Quarry

Air Quality, Water Quality and Noise

CW-05 Sosok-Tayan, Tanjung-Batas Kota Sanggau Quarry - Water Quality

CW-05 Sosok-Tayan, Tanjung-Batas Kota Sanggau Quarry - Air Quality and Noise

CW-06 Asphalt Mixing Plant (AMP)


CW-06 Asphalt Mixing Plant (AMP) Water Quality

CW-06 Asphalt Mixing Plant (AMP) Air Quality and Noise


CW-06 Quarry

CW-06 Quarry Water Quality

CW-06 Quarry Air Quality and Noise

CW-07 AMDAL Simpang Tanjung-Aruk


CW-07 ANDAL Simpang Tanjung-Aruk Air Quality

CW-07 ANDAL Simpang Tanjung-Aruk Water Quality


CW-07 Asphalt Mixing Plant (AMP)

CW-07 AMP Air Quality

CW-07 AMP Water Quality


CW-07 Quarry

CW-07 Quarry Air Quality

CW-07 Quarry Water Quality

Photographs

APPENDIX C

1. Dry stockpile and base coarse material at CW-04. Can cause wind blown dust to affect nearby

residential area.

2. Explosives storage area at package CW-04. The storage area is far from residential areas and

with warning signs.

3. Embankment area at CW-04. There is a need to improve slope protection measures to prevent

landslide and keep the material from encroaching into the adjacent property.

4. Road works and Earthworks (cut and fill, blasting) at CW-04. Permit for spoil disposal area need

to be secured.

5. There is yet no allowed disposal area for excavated materials/spoils for CW-04. Securing of the

necessary permit is still ongoing.

1. No warning signs on dangerous portion of the road (muddy and slippery) where drainage works

are ongoing at CW-06.

2. Insufficient warning signs along road works at CW-06. Traffic management should be

implemented in busy areas.

3. There is yet no allowed disposal area for excavated materials/spoils for CW-06. Securing of the

necessary permit is still ongoing.

1. Insufficient access bridges for residents to their houses (CW-07).

2. There is yet no allowed disposal area for excavated materials/spoils. Securing of the necessary

permit is still ongoing for CW-07.

3. Insufficient warning signs along road and drainage works along CW-07 alignment.

4. Insufficient watering at CW-07. Road is dusty and can affect workers, vegetation and residents in

immediate vicinity.

5. Slopes is high and steep in some work areas at CW-07. Evaluate if necessary to use slope

protection measures to prevent erosion and mitigate impact to adjacent vegetation and for

safety.