- Folie 1 -

Environmental Management System ISO 14001 – Motivation for Serbia

DI Axel Dick; MSc

- Folie 2 -

The first definition of sustainability was given byH.C. v. Carlowitz (1713)in the context of forestry inCentral Europe.

Sustainable Development– Back to the roots

- Folie 3 -

Political Milestones and the Development of Standards

1713: Sustainability; H.C. v. Carlowitz

1987: Brundtlandreport „Our Common Future“;

The ISO 9001 comes into force.

1992: International Conference of the UN for Environment and Development (UNCED); Rio de Janeiro:Local Agenda 21; KyotoEMAS,….

1972: Foundation of the Ministry for Environment in Austria

1984: The basic right of environmental quality becomes part of the federal constitution (BGBl Nr. 491/1984)

1993: Eco-Audit (Eco Management Audit Scheme EMAS)Foundation of FSC International

1996: ISO 14001

End 90ies: PEFCPan European Forest Certification

2003: PEFC changes to: Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes

1992: Öst. Umweltzeichen

1999: Health & safety: OHSAS 18001

- Folie 4 -

Brundtland Report, 1987:“Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."

- 5 -

- 6 -

85 8174

65 65 63 6155 54 52 47

3936 31

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Lega

l Cer

taint

y

Contr

ol en

viron

menta

l effec

ts

Qualifi

catio

n env

ironm

entIm

age

Incre

ase e

nviro

nmen

tal pe

rform

ance

Qualifi

catio

n Hea

lth/ s

afety

Qualifi

catio

n QM

Reduc

tion o

f liab

ilty r

isks

relat

ion ad

ministr

ation

Incre

ase p

roce

ss pe

rform

ance

Cutso

mers´

satis

factio

n

Marke

t pos

ition

Reduc

tion o

f acc

ident

s

Ecod

esign

How has the certification contributed to the criteria stated below? Please evaluate each criterion. The certification has had a strong or very strong influence on [%]:

The impact of the certification lies on :

Increase of the legal certaintyBetter control of the environmental effectsDeepening the qualification of the staff with respact to environment/health and safety issuesIncrease of the imageIncrease of the environmental performanceConsolidation of the market position

- 7 -

Comparison ISO 9001 vs IMS

44

85

56

65

5147 46

39

17

36

15

31

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Lega

l cer

taint

yIm

age

Cutso

mers´

satis

factio

n

Marke

t pos

ition

Reduc

tion o

f acc

ident

s

Ecod

esign

ISO 9001IMS

How has the certification contributed to the criteria stated below? The certification has had a strong oder very strong influence on [%]:

The main differences between the two samples are:

Increase of thelegal certaintyIncrease of the imageReduction of accidentsEcodesign