Upload
bubz111
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 English Unit 1oral Speech
1/3
Govt told to ban smoking in outdoordining areasByMelissa BrownUpdated Fri May 10, 2013 8:23pm AESTPersuasive
Almost 200 cancer specialists have written to the VictorianGovernment calling for a ban on smoking in outdoor dining anddrinking areas.
The members of the Cancer Council's clinical network believe the ban willprotect people from second-hand smoke and help stop quitters fromrelapsing.
Professor David Ball, the chairman of the lung service at Melbourne'sPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, says second-hand smoke kills hundredsof thousands of people around the world each year.
He has likened smoking in outdoor dining areas to spraying asbestos dustover the tables.
"If a restaurateur allowed asbestos dust to be sprayed around the outdoordining area, there'd be an outrage," Professor Ball said.
"So it's interesting to me that there's a double standard about two cancer-
producing substances."
Victoria is the only state that has not introduced or committed to a ban onsmoking in outdoor dining areas.
"Victoria has a particularly proud record in implementing legislation overseveral decades which have reduced the smoking rates to among thelowest in the world and it's a pity to see the policy stalling at this stage," hesaid.
"Every day I have to tell some Victorians and their families the bad newsthat they have lung cancer and it may not be curable.
"I really wish I could have less of these conversations."
Quit Victoria's executive director Fiona Sharkie says almost 4,000Victorians die of smoking-related illnesses every year.
"Seven out of 10 Victorians want to see smoke-free outdoor dining anddrinking areas in our state," she said.
"Given 86 per cent of Victorians don't smoke, that's not surprising."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/melissa-brown/167028http://www.abc.net.au/news/melissa-brown/167028http://www.abc.net.au/news/melissa-brown/167028http://www.abc.net.au/news/melissa-brown/1670287/27/2019 English Unit 1oral Speech
2/3
Good morning Year 11s and Miss Passas
The issue in which I will be discussing today is: Should smokers be banned from
lighting up in any public space?
There has been much debate and discussion on this topic however it has recently
become a very intense topic, as Victoria is the only Victoria is the only state that
has not introduced or committed to a ban on smoking in outdoor dining areas.
Mellissa Brown a journalist for ABC news investigates and provides evidence on
this issue in her article titled Government told to ban smoking in outdoordinning areas on May 10, 2013 on ABC news website.
Throughout her article she provides evidence that sways the readers to agree
with her point of view, which is that the government should ban smokers from
lighting up in public areas. She restates her contention throughout the article bystating Almost 200 cancer specialists have written to the Victorian
Government calling for a ban on smoking in outdoor dining and drinking
areas. This also provides an experts opinion thus making the readers feel as
though her evidence and information is more professional and factual.
Therefore her article gain credibility as it proves that Brown had went
through research and had went through the effort to get expert opinions. She
then continues in her article stating that Peter MaCallum from Melbournes
Cancer centre had said second-hand smoke kills hundreds of thousands of
people around the world each year this statement may be exaggerated
however it appeals to fear thus capturing the readers attention. In the middleof her article Miranda continues on to say that If a restaurateur allowed
asbestos dust to be sprayed around the outdoor dining area, there'd be an
outrage this sentence has an emotional impact therefore by making readers
respond on an emotional level it positions them to share her viewpoint. By
providing evidence on the matter and using expert opinion she highlights her
viewpoints explicitly to the audience hence effectively capturing the readers
attention and also this makes her arguments more notable.
Mellissas audience is mainly targeted by the people of Victoria especially
those who wishes to protect their family and their health. As her evidence
suggest that second hand smoking is fatal and is killing a large number of
people, she appeals to fear and family values. She attempts to convince her
audience by using a serious tone, evident in sentences such as killing
hundreds and thousand of people each year or by stating that doctors must
deliver the bad new that a Victorian citizen has lung cancer and it may not be
curable. Other persuasive techniques that she applies include anecdote,
reason and logic, attacks and also loyalty and patriotism.
Brown first used an anecdote by saying how she wishes to have fewer
conversations where she has to tell Victorians and their families that they
have lung cancer. She is drawing on her personal experience thus making theissue appear more real Because she has drawn on her personal experience
7/27/2019 English Unit 1oral Speech
3/3
this engages the audience and also because it is a true story it also carries
weight with the readers. Using this technique makes the readers have a sense
of something more personal thus making them think that this could happen
to them or someone close to them. As a result, this positions the readers to
agree with her viewpoint that the government should banned smoking in
outdoor dinning areas even before they have finished reading the whole
article.
She also appeals to loyalty and patriotism stating, "Victoria has a particularly
proud record in implementing legislation over several decades this invokes
feelings of pride, and a shared identity and common purpose. The readers are
therefore positioned to feel the need to keep up Victorias reputations and
they will then urge the government to banned smoking in outdoor dinning
area.
Overall, Mellissa Brown uses a vast ranged of different persuasive techniquesin order to convince readers that smoking in outdoor dinning areas is
hazardous to our health and therefore the government should ban it.
Thank you for listening.