26
SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 1 CHAPTER 11 BREAKEVEN AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

  • Upload
    quark87

  • View
    909

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 1

CHAPTER 11

BREAKEVEN AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Page 2: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 2

INTRODUCTION

In the previous chapter, the estimates of revenues, costs, other quantities for the eng eco analysis were assumed with high degree of confidence.

It is called assumed certainty.

The decisions based on this sometimes called decisions under certainty.

However, it is very rare care whereby the estimates of quantities can be assumed as certain. The element of doubt exists as to the economic results that will be obtained from an engineering project.

Page 3: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 3

RISK Risk and uncertainty are similar in that they

both present the problem of not knowing what future conditions will be

Risk offers estimates of probabilities for possible outcomes

Uncertainty does not provide estimates of probabilities for possible outcomes

This book treats them as interchangeable

Page 4: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 4

PRINCIPLE 6: Make Uncertainty Explicit (recognize and make known)

We need to determine to what degree, changes in an estimates would effect a capital investment decision.

In other words:

To determine how sensitive a given investment is to changes in particular factors (ex: annual revenues, project life, MV, annual costs) that are not known with certainty.

If a small changes in the relative magnitude of a factor will reverse an investment decision, the decision is said to be highly sensitive to that factor.

Page 5: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 5

FOUR MAJOR SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY

1. Possible inaccuracy of cash-flow estimates used in the study

2. Type of business relative to the future health of the economy

3. Type of physical plant and equipment involved

4. Length of study period

Page 6: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 6

POSSIBLE INACCURACY OF CASH-FLOW ESTIMATES

How much source information is available

How dependable is the source information

Uncertainty in capital investment requirements is often reflected as a contingency above actual cost of plant and equipment (commonly used)

Page 7: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 7

TYPE OF BUSINESS INVOLVED RELATIVE TO HEALTH OF

ECONOMY

Some businesses will typically be more at risk of declining when there is a general decline in the economy --- when the economy has gone into recession

Page 8: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 8

TYPE OF PHYSICAL PLANT AND EQUIPMENT INVOLVED

Some types of structures and equipment have definite economic lives and market values – they may be used in a multitude of settings.

Other dwellings and equipment, being made for very specific and singular functions, may have little or no resale value

Page 9: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 9

LENGTH OF STUDY PERIOD

The longer the study period, the greater the level of uncertainty of a capital investment

Page 10: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 10

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Sensitivity – The degree to which a

measure of merit (i.e., PW, IRR, etc…) will change as a result of changes in one or more of the study factor values.

Sensitivity Analysis Techniques

1. Breakeven Analysis √

2. Sensitivity Graph (spider plot) √

3. Combination of factors

Page 11: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 11

BREAKEVEN ANALYSIS Technique commonly used when an uncertain

single factor (EG: capacity utilization) determines the selection of an alternative or acceptability of an engineering project

For given alternative, if best estimate of actual outcome of common factor is higher or lower than the breakeven point, and assumed certain, the best alternative becomes apparent

1. Indifference between alternatives (EWA = f1(y); EWB = f2(y)

EWA = EWB; f1(y) = f2(y) : Solve for y (a common factor of interest)

2. Economic acceptability of engineering project

EWp = f(z) = 0

The value of ‘z’ is the value at which we would be indifferent between accepting or rejecting the project

Page 12: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 12

BREAKEVEN PROBLEM INVOLVING TWO ALTERNATIVES

Most easily approached mathematically by equating an equivalent worth of the two alternatives expressed as a function of the factor of interest

Page 13: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 13

BREAKEVEN ANALYSIS FOR ECONOMIC ACCEPTABILITY OF AN

ENGINEERING PROJECT

Most easily approached by equating an equivalent worth of the project to zero as a function of the factor of concern

Because of the potential difference in project lives, care should be taken to determine whether the coterminated or the repeatability assumption best fits the situation

Page 14: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 14

EXAMPLE APPLICATIONS OF BREAKEVEN ANALYSIS

Annual revenue and expenses

Solve for annual revenue required to equal annual expenses.

Rate of return

Solve for the rate of return on the increment of invested capital at which two given alternatives are equally desirable.

Market (or salvage) value

Solve for the future resale value that would result in indifference as to preference for an alternative.

Page 15: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 15

EXAMPLE APPLICATIONS OF BREAKEVEN ANALYSIS

Equipment Life

Solve for the useful life required for an engineering project to be economically justified.

Capacity utilization

Solve for the hour utilisation per year at which an alternative is justified or at which two alternatives are equally desirable.

Page 16: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 16

Alpha Beta$ $

Investment 12,000 16,000Operating expenses/year 5.04X 4.05XMaintenance expenses/year 500 250Taxes and insurance/year 187 240MARR = 15%, useful life 10 yrsX = number of hours of operation per year

AC MOTOR, 100Hp

Example 10-1: Breakeven Analysis

AW(15%)Alpha = 12,000(A/P, 15%, 10) + 5.04X + 500 + 187

AW(15%)Beta = 16,000(A/P, 15%, 10) + 4.05X + 250 + 240

At breakeven point, AWα = AWβ.

Page 17: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 17

Equating AWα = AWβ

2,490 + 5.04X + 500 + 187 = 3,190 + 4.05X + 250 + 240

5.04X + 3,177 = 4.05X + 3,680

X = 508 hrs/year

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,200 1,300

1,000

9,000

3,000

7,000

5,000

AW (15%)

Hours of operation per year, X

α

β

Select αSelect β

Page 18: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 18

SENSITIVITY GRAPH(SPIDERPLOT)

An analysis tool applicable when the breakeven analysis does not fit the project situation.

Makes explicit the impact of uncertainty in the estimates of each factor of concern on the economic measure of merit (PW, AW, FW).

Page 19: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 19

EXAMPLE 10-4: Sensitivity GraphEXAMPLE 10-4: Sensitivity Graph

The cash-flow estimates of a piece of new equipment with useful life of 6 years are as follows:

Capital investment, I $11,500

Revenues/year $ 5,000

Expenses/year $ 2,000

Salvage value, SV $ 1,000

Investigate PW over a range of + 40% changes in estimates for

a. Capital investment

b. Annual net cash flow

c. Salvage value

d. Useful Life

Page 20: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 20

The basic equation using PW:

This equation is termed “the best estimate”:

PW(10%) = -$11,500 + $3,000 (P / A, 10%, 6) +

$1,000 (P / F,10)

= $2,130

This value occurs at the intersection point of the spider plot.

Page 21: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 21

a) When the capital investment, I varies by ± p% the PW is

PW(10%) = -(1 ± p% / 100)($11,500) + $5,000(P/A, 10%, 6)

- $2,000(P/A, 10%, 6) + $1,000(P/F, 10%, 6)

(P/A, 10%, 6) = 4.3553

(P/F, 10%, 6) = 0.5645

Revenues/year = $5,000

Expenses/year = $2,000I = $5,000

SV = $1,000

Page 22: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 22

SENSITIVITY GRAPH (SPIDERPLOT) OF FOUR FACTORS

-% DeviationChanges inFactor Estimate

+%Deviation Changes in Factor Estimate

PW (10%)

- 40 -30 -20 -10 +10 +20 +30 +400-1000

-2000

-3000

1000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

$2130

Annual N

et C

ash F

low, A

Useful Life

, N

Salvage Value, SV

Capital Investment

2000

18.5%

Page 23: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 23

REVELATIONS OF SPIDERPLOT

Shows the sensitivity of the present worth to percent deviation changes in each factor’s best estimate

Other factors are assumed to remain at their best estimate values

The relative degree of sensitivity of the present worth to each factor is indicated by the slope of the curves (the “steeper” the slope of a curve the more sensitive the present worth is to the factor)

The intersection of each curve with the abscissa shows the percent change in each factor’s best estimate at which the present worth is zero

Page 24: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 24

REVELATIONS OF SPIDERPLOTIn this example

Present worth is insensitive to SV Present worth is sensitive to I, A, and N

From the spiderplot it is obvious that the investment, I , can be increased by 18.5% without causing the project’s PW (10%) to become negative.

Page 25: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 25

PITFALLS OF RISK-ADJUSTED MARR

A widely used industrial practice for including some consideration of uncertainty is to increase the MARR

Even though intent of risk-adjusted MARR is to make more uncertain projects appear less economically attractive, opposite may appear to be true

Cost-only projects are made to appear more desirable as the interest rate is adjusted upward to account for uncertainty

Page 26: Engeco Chap 11 Breakeven and Sensitivity Analysis

SEMESTER JANUARY 2009 26

REDUCTION OF USEFUL LIFE

By excluding those revenues (savings) and expenses that may occur after a reduced study period, heavy emphasis is placed on rapid recovery of capital in early years of a project’s life

This method is closely related to the discounted payback technique and suffers from most of the same deficiencies (ignore the cash flows after the payback period)