Energistics Overview Alan Doniger, CTO November 18, 2008

Energistics Overview

Alan Doniger, CTO

November 18, 2008

Introduction to Energistics

• An open standards industry consortium

• Eighteen years serving the upstream industry

• With 102 active members…

– Integrated, independent and national energy companies

– Oilfield service and professional service companies

– Software, hardware and integration vendors

– Regulatory agencies, institutes and media partners

Our Energy Standards Resource Centre

Our Energy Company Members

http://www.total.com/en/home_page/

Energistics: The Four Challenges

• Strategic Perspective– Strategic Standardization Management

• Standards Collaboration– Focus on highest value standards that don’t impact

competition• Best practice guidelines

• Industry Commitment– Internal and external commitment to widespread

standards adoption

• Value Delivery– Describing and measuring business value of standards use

Our Flagship Standards…

MembershipBoard of Directors

Standards Advisory CouncilGlobal Regions

Management & Staff

Other SIGs

Organization & Communities

Asset & Data Mgt SIG

PRODML SIG

WITSML SIG

Energistics Standards:WITSML, PRODML, etc.

Special Interest Groups are user communities forfamilies of standards

Standards Advisory Council

• Formed in 2007 • Members are appointed• Dual role

– Advise– Assist

• People with broad experience in multiple subjects and aspects of operations and industry collaboration

• Focus on “The Four Challenges”• Current members represent

– BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, ONGC (India), Pioneer NR, Shell, Total– Halliburton, Schlumberger

Industry Services SIG• Technical Architecture

Energistics Subject Areas

ReservoirEngineering

ExplGeology

Petrophysics PetroleumEngineering

Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering

ProductionOperationsGeophysics

DrillingOperations

Completion &Workover

AssetManagement


ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations


SIG

Geophysics SIG SIG SIG

Geology SIG• RP66, DLIS

Asset/DataManagement SIG

• Global Unique Well Id

eRegulatory SIG• ePermitting• NDR

<<RESQMLRESQML//>>

<<WITSMLWITSML//>>

<<PRODMLPRODML//>>




ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations


AssetManagement


ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations


SIG






<<RESQMLRESQML//>>

<<WITSMLWITSML//>>

<<PRODMLPRODML//>>

WITSML Summary

Wellsite Information Transfer Standard Markup Language

“The ‘right-time’ seamless flow of well-site data between operators and service companies to speed and enhance decision-making”

An Open Information Transfer Standard for the Oilfield

WITSML Headlines

• Scope– Data Transfer and Web Services Standards– Focus: Drill Site to Office / Control Center– Focus: Drilling and Completion

• Status– Completing 8th Year (started in late 2000 by Statoil and

BP)– Focus: Growing Adoption, and Use – Strong User Community (SIG) of 50+ Organizations– Semi-annual Meetings, Seminar and Exhibition– Active SIG teams; substantive change management

process– Version 1.3.1.1 (Q1 2007)– Version 1.4.0 (Q4 2008)




ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations


AssetManagement


ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations


SIG






<<RESQMLRESQML//>>

<<WITSMLWITSML//>>

<<PRODMLPRODML//>>

PRODML Helping achieve production optimization

Freely available, universally applicable

Enables low-risk and low-cost use of proven optimization solutions

Accelerates and encourages innovation

PRODML Headlines

• Scope– Data Transfer and Web Services Standards– Focus: Support Production Optimization Processes– Focus: Support Field Production Reporting

• Status– Completing 3rd Year (started in Aug. 2005)– Focus: Iterative Development & Implementations– Growing User Community (SIG) of ~40 Organizations– Four In-person Working Meeting Annually– Active SIG teams and Implementation-Focused Work

Group – Version 1.0 (Q4 2006)– Version 1.1 (Q4 2008)– Testing Starting on Additional Services and Objects

PRODML: Active Participants

• Founders (from Aug. 2005) [13]– BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Shell, StatoilHydro– Halliburton, Invensys, Kongsberg Intellifield, OSISoft,

Petroleum Experts, Schlumberger, TietoEnator, Weatherford

• Joined in 2007 [17]– ConocoPhillips, Pioneer Natural Resources, ONGC – AspenTech, Euriware, Honeywell, IBM, Infosys, Intelligent

Agent, Matrikon, P2 Energy Solutions, Petris, Roxar, Satyam, SensorTran, TIBCO

• Joined in 2008 [8]– Total– Atos Origin, BearingPoint, Merrick Systems, Petrolink, PDS,

PKO Services, SAIC, Tata Consultancy

THE PROBLEMMultiple Component SolutionsLack of Interoperability standards

THE SOLUTIONPRODML Open Standards

PRODML Positioning

SCADASystems

Sensor Data

ReservoirModels

Geoscience Data

OPC Domain De facto Standards

PRODML Domain

High Frequency Low Frequency

30

Drilling Systems

WITSML Domain

Maintenance Systems

Maintenance Domain

Many Production Applications

ApplicationA

ApplicationB

Applicationetc.

ApplicationC

Business Processes

After Chevron, ExxonMobil

PRODML Use Case Road Map 2006-10 (Aug. ‘07)

Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Use Cases

(i) (ii) (i) (ii) (i) (ii) (i) (ii)

Daily or Less

Gas Lift Opt.

G/L & flowing well surveillance

Downhole sensors PTQ, DTS

Daily reporting

Reporting NOJVs ESP wells SRP wells

Daily to Weekly

Smart well offtake optimiz-ation

Fluids capacity forecast

Smart well opt with downhole allocation

Fluids capacity optimiz-ation

Well completion transfer & referencing

Welltest validation

Integration with facilities maintenance

Weekly to Q’ly

Shared network model with change propagation

Shared network model with different detail level

Reservoir voidage and monitoring

Integration with process simulation

Monthly regulatory reporting

Q’ly to LOF

Reservoir-Production Dev Planning

Types of PRODML Applications

• Surveillance and Monitoring– Continuous comparison of actual to predicted measurements; out

of range condition invokes analysis • Operational Modeling

– Predictive algorithms to predict future measurements from historical measurements and operational plans

• Simulation and Optimization– Predictive algorithms to predict future measurements and related

set points that achieve pre-defined objectives• Advisory and Alert

– Invoked when post-analytical predicted and actual performance differ significantly; alerts for remedial control changes

• Allocation and Reconciliation– Derives critical values from measurements, as in back-allocation

of volumes to wellbores

Evolution of Use Case Categorization(background)

Well Data Point Characteristics: All Well Types

Process Impact by Application

Me

as

ure

me

nt

Ty

pe

Data Points

1.

Ga

s W

ell

2.

Na

tura

lly

Flo

win

g O

il W

ell

3.

Ga

s L

ifte

d W

ell

4.

ES

P W

ell

5.

Ro

d-D

riv

en

PC

P W

ell

6.

Be

am

Pu

mp

ed

We

ll

7.

Inje

cti

on

We

lls

(W

ate

r &

Ga

s)

Ev

en

t &

Ale

rt T

rig

ge

r M

on

ito

r

We

ll T

es

t M

on

ito

rin

g &

Op

tim

isa

tio

n

Pro

du

cti

on

su

rve

illa

nc

e

Da

ily

Pro

du

cti

on

Mo

nit

ori

ng

&

Op

tim

isa

tio

n

Inje

cti

on

Mo

nit

ori

ng

& O

pti

mis

ati

on

Fu

ture

F/W

mo

du

le

QC

We

ll T

es

t

Va

lid

ate

Me

as

ure

me

nts

Pro

du

cti

on

Es

tim

ate

HC

A

PF

WR

S /

F

ield

De

vp

Co

mm

en

ts

Bottom Hole Pressure(1,2,3,5,6,7)

X X X X X X

Pump Intake Pressure(4)

X

Pump discharge Pressure(4)

X

Production Casing Pressure(1,2,4,5,6,7)

X X X X X X

Flowing Tubing Head Pressure(1,2,3,4,5,6,7)

X X X X X X X

Lift Gas Pressure (upstream of meter)(3)

X

Lift Gas Meter Differential Pressure (dp)(3)

X

Sand Filter Differential Pressure(1)

X

Hydrate Catcher Differential Pressure(1)

X

Flow Line Pressure Differential(1,2,3,4,5,6)

X X X X X X

Flow Line Pressure Into Venturi(1)

X

Lift Gas Pressure (CHP)(3)

X

Bulk Lift Gas Pressure(3)

X

Other Annulus Pressure(1,2,3,4,5,6,7)

X X X X X X X

Flow Line Pressure Differetial Across Vonturi (Two DP) Cells

(1)

X

Flow line Pressure(2,3,4,5)

X X X X

FlowLine Pressure out of Venturi(1)

X

X X X X X X X

X

X X X X

X X X X

X X X X

X X X X

X X X X

X X X X

X

X X X X X

X X

X

X

Business Applications ===>

Pressure (Analog)

Well TypesBusiness Processes: Production Operation / Monitoring; Production Optimization; HCA; PSO; WRS/FDP; Well Testing; Production Forecasting

Integrity / Maintenance (Condition Monitoring / Operation Maintenance)

PS

O

2007

Natural Flow

Cont. Gas Lift

Smart wells

Gas Injection

Water Injection ESP SRP Other…

Daily Reporting 3Monthly Reporting 3NOJV Reporting 2Statutory Reporting 1Well test steady state 3Well Reservoir Inflow/Drainage area 2Sampling and fluid reporting 2Well Lift Surveillance 3 2 2 3 3 1 1 1Well Control/local optimisation 3 2 2 3 3 1 1 1Well Completion/Design 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1Well Diagnosis 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Well Services 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Multi-well snap shot optimisation 3 3 2 3 3 1 1 1Multi-well forecasting 3Integrated Process Simulation 1Integrated Reservoir Simulation 1Well test transient 2Reservoir Forecast 1Reservoir Development Plan 1

Enabling "Smart" Systems Dynamically changing asset 2

Applicability Symbol Number as % Other lift types (for future):Completed and mature 3 14 23% PlungerPartially completed/under development 2 12 20% PCPNot complete, for future consideration 1 35 57% Intermittent gas liftNot applicable in this category etc

Reservoir

Production System Operations

Application to all lift

typesKind of activity Use case category

Application depends on kind of well lift

Well & Lift Specific Operations

Reporting

UCT 2008

Shell contribution

Categories

SPE RTO TIG Coord.

Production Reporting

volumes etc - internal, partner regulators

Production Operations Reportingmovements, activities etc

Well Surveillance

measuring for all well kinds

Well Control & Optimization

maximizing from current configuration

Well Completion & Services changing the well configuration

Facility Surveillance

measuring in the facilities

Facility Control and Optimization maximizing from current configuration

Facility Design and Construction changing the facilities configuration

Facility Maintenance

activities that impact on production

Reservoir Surveillance

well testing, sampling, decline etc

Asset Production Forecasting forecasts from various tools

Asset Development Planning whole asset + capital planning

Reserves Monitoring

tracking reserves - life of asset

PRODML: New Use Case Categorization Work

In Scope?

Mimosa?

WITSML

RESQML?

Well use cases are further divided by lift type




ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations


AssetManagement


ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations


SIG






<<RESQMLRESQML//>>

<<WITSMLWITSML//>>

<<PRODMLPRODML//>>

Global Unique Well Identifier (GUWI) Headlines

• Scope– Wellbore identification worldwide [except N.

America]– Focus: Standards with supporting commercial-grade

services

• Status– Formal launch, July 1, 2008– Primary service provider: IHS – A&DM SIG Work Group formed– Monthly conference calls– Sub-teams

• High priority country selection and adoption planning• Data scope and definition (clarification)• Marketing and awareness material preparation

Well Identity Standards & Services Work Group

• Founding Sponsors / Participants– BP– Chevron– ExxonMobil– Pioneer– Shell– Total– UK Government– Halliburton– Schlumberger– Accenture– IHS




ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations


AssetManagement


ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations


SIG






<<RESQMLRESQML//>>

<<WITSMLWITSML//>>

<<PRODMLPRODML//>>

RESQML Headlines

• Scope– Re-development of RESCUE class library as Web

Services and XML Data Exchange Standards– Focus: Earth models and reservoir models

• Includes support for Geological and Geophysical models in coordination with respective SIGs

– “Reservoir Characterization with XML”– Earth models, reservoir models – Data for wells, faults, horizons, stratigraphy, etc.– CRS/projection, units, points, lines, grids (points,

lines, pillars, etc.)

• Status and Plans– Formal launch, January 1, 2009– Operating procedures same as other SIGs – Preliminary management and technical meetings

• May, July, September, December– Legacy RESCUE support to continue for ~18 months– Compatibility with other Energistics Standards– Coordinate/interface with relevant external

technologies/standards• OGP EPSG, OGC GML, GeoSciML, etc.

– Market for greater awareness and participation

RESQML Headlines

Participants in Preliminary RESQML Meetings

• BP

• CMG

• DGI

• ESSS

• Fugro

• Halliburton

• IFP

• Midland Valley

• Paradigm

• PDS

• Roxar

• Schlumberger

• Shell

• SMT

• Total

• Transform Software

• Energistics




ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations


AssetManagement


ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations


SIG






<<RESQMLRESQML//>>

<<WITSMLWITSML//>>

<<PRODMLPRODML//>>

Geophysics SIG

• ONGC (India) requested an assessment of whether Energistics should work with the Geophysics SIG to improve geophysics work practices – Started late 2007, ended Q3 of 2008– Assessment report published (Nov. 2008)– Results: Substantial cycle time savings can be achieved

• Future Plans– Publish and discuss best practice recommendations– Increase level of collaboration with the SEG TSC– Coordinate geophysics data exchange needs with the

RESQML SIG– Place Energistics resource in the South Asia Region to work

closely on implementation of the specific recommendations

Best Practice Recommendations

• Work Practice Improvement Categories– Life-cycle view of data procedures– Enterprise view of data ownership– Adequate data handling resources– Use of available data standards

Best Practice Recommendations

• Work Practice Improvement Areas– Geodetics/CRS– Acquisition agreements– Data compression– Naming– Use of SEG Standards– Data management – Integrating position and trace data– Observer’s Logs– Survey Reports– Processor’s Logs– Trade data evaluation– Quality control




ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations


AssetManagement


ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations


SIG






<<RESQMLRESQML//>>

<<WITSMLWITSML//>>

<<PRODMLPRODML//>>

National Data Repositories Work Group

• Management Committee Participants– Australia, Canada, India, Kenya, Netherlands, New

Zealand, Norway, South Africa, UK, USA– Halliburton, Schlumberger, PennWell, RPS [Paras]– Energistics

• Other Committees– Steering, Technical, Communications, and Planning

• NDR Conference Coordination– NDR9: Aug. 31 – Sep. 3, ‘09, New Delhi, India,

hosted by Directorate General of Hydrocarbons (DGH)

Thank you شكرا

Documents

Energistics Overview Alan Doniger, CTO November 18, 2008