16
Emerging Architectures for Post-IP Networking* Daniel F. Macedo 1 , Aldri L. dos Santos 2 ,Guy Pujolle 1 1 Université Pierre et Marie Curie- Paris VI, France 2 Federal University of Paraná, Brazil *This work has been partially financed by CNPq, a funding organization from the science and technology ministry, Brazil.

Emerging Architectures for Post-IP Networking*

  • Upload
    lance

  • View
    25

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Emerging Architectures for Post-IP Networking*. Daniel F. Macedo 1 , Aldri L. dos Santos 2 ,Guy Pujolle 1 1 Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris VI, France 2 Federal University of Paraná, Brazil. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

Emerging Architectures for

Post-IP Networking*

Daniel F. Macedo1, Aldri L. dos Santos2,Guy Pujolle1

1 Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris VI, France2 Federal University of Paraná, Brazil

*This work has been partially financed by CNPq, a funding organization from the science and technology ministry, Brazil.

Page 2: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

Outline

Why should we replace IP? Post-IP Architectures Research Challenges and Directions in

Post-IP

Page 3: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

The Internet Nowadays

IP was very well-designed, being used for more than 30 years now

IP is a victim of its own success: new scenarios with significant challenges:Node mobilityThe Internet of things: small, restricted

devices

Page 4: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

Why should we replace IP networks? IP is used for identification and routing

It changes when stations roam from one network to another to allow proper routing

Packets addressed to the ancient IP of a station are routed to the old network, breaking connections

Need to decouple routing and addressing!

Page 5: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

Why should we replace IP networks? The End-to-End (E2E) principle is

frequently violatedSmart middle-boxes, e.g. NAT and proxies

that break other E2E applications Proxies do not work with SSL connections NATs are not compatible with P2P

Context-aware networks

Page 6: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

Why should we replace IP networks? Too difficult to be managed by humans

Too many nodes Changes are frequent due to mobility

Shift from operator-based management to autonomic-based management

Scalable self-organizing solutions, where local decisions lead to near optimal global behavior

Page 7: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

An Overview of Post-IP Architectures

Page 8: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

AdaptNet

Goals Support mobile users roaming among BSs Deliver multimedia content over wireless links IP-compatible

Solution: heavy use of cross-layering Proactively opens TCP connections before

handover to allow seamless operation Automatically changes the codec in the app.

Layer

Page 9: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

Ambient Networks, Plutarch

Post-IP networks will be a concatenation of autonomic heterogeneous networks

Architecture An autonomic management plane

Ambient Control Space (Ambient Networks) Interstitial Functions (Plutarch)

Several layers of names to cope with mobility Bearers, End Points and Sessions (Ambient Networks) Contexts (Plutarch)

Page 10: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

Ambient Networks

Page 11: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

NewArch

GoalsRedesign the Internet from scratchRethink the layering modelProvide solutions adapted to wireless links

Page 12: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

NewArch

The RBA architecture Role-based forwarding Improvement of active networks, where roles

define the code to be executed in routers Resembles the stratum paradigm

Addressing mobility Three levels of naming, allowing node and agent

mobility

Page 13: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

Challenges and Directions

Page 14: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

Challenges and Directions

An urgent need to rethink layering IP is hard to kill: Post-IP must support old

equipment Autonomic management of post-IP networks No attention has been given to

Emergent networks (ad hoc, WSNs, home networks) QoS Security

Page 15: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

Challenges and Directions

Security and Dependability Standards (benchmarks, tools, etc…) to validate

the dependability and security of networks Large scale test-beds

Fast, low-cost testing of new protocols of planetary-scale networks

Several initiatives: PlanetLab, VINI, GENI

Virtualization

Page 16: Emerging Architectures for  Post-IP Networking*

Questions?

[email protected]