Upload
donald-knight
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Outcomes:
• To identify characteristics relating to the ELL student group and the impact language acquisition has on ELLs’ learning.
• To discuss how Reading Specialists and ESOL teachers provide instruction to accelerate reading development of ELLs.
The Growing Population of ELLS
2007-08: approximately 1,600 ELLs
2008-09: approximately 1,800 ELLs
2009-10: approximately 2,100 ELLs
2010-11: approximately 2,200 ELLs
2011-12: approximately 2,250 ELLs1,650 ELLs at the elementary level
250 ELLs at the middle school level
350 ELLs at the high school level
The Growing Population of ELLS
The 2,250 ELLs represent:
Over 60 languages: Spanish, Korean, Urdu, Chinese, and Chin
Approximately 78 countries
LAS Links Proficiency Levels of ELLs
Level 1 - Low Beginner
Level 2 - High Beginner
Level 3 - Low Intermediate
Level 4 - High Intermediate
Level 5 - Advanced
Level 6 - Independent
What do you understand when you know a language?
• The music
• The sounds
• The correct sequence of sounds in a word
• How to use and interpret intonation
• How to change the time of a sentence
• The order of words
• Formal v. informal language
• Idiomatic expressions
• A wealth of vocabulary
• The variety in meaning of words
• How to use language to build relationships
• Connections between language and culture
• How to ask for information
• How to persuade
• How to enter a conversation without interrupting
• How to take turns in conversation
• Language nuances
• The gestures
Key Differences: L1 and L2 Acquisition
Key Differences: L1 and L2 Acquisition
First Language:
• Learned through total immersion
• Learned at home • Learned by young children • Learned in order to
communicate with loved ones• • Largely an unconscious
process
• No time pressure to learn
• Must learn developmental concepts as well as language
Second Language:
• Learned through partial immersion
• Hampered by emotions
• Learned at an older age
• Learned to communicate in less personal situations such as schools or work
• Very conscious and often methodical
• Great time pressures
• Acquire while learning academic concepts already acquired in the L1
BICS and CALPBasic Interpersonal
Communication Skills
BICS: Are necessary for
everyday functioning.
Are very context sensitive and depend on nonverbal cues.
Can typically be achieved in the classroom with good contextual support.
Cognitive Academic
Language Proficiency
CALP: Is very context
reduced and depends more on cognitive capabilities.
Depends on the relationship between the native language and new language since it is best if both are sufficiently developed.
Common Underlying Proficiency
(CUP)
BICS-L1
CALP-L1
BICS-L2
CALP-L2
Illustration adapted from Cummins (1984) Bilingual And Special Education: Issues In Assessment and Pedagogy
The Bottom Line
In order for students to achieve academically and exhibit that learning on large scale, high stakes assessments, they MUST master Academic Language.
Performance
Definitions: A New Tool
2- Emerging
Criteria for Performance Definitions
•Linguistic Complexity: • The amount and quality of speech or writing for a given situation
•Vocabulary Usage: • The specificity of words or phrases for a given context
•Language Control: • The comprehensibility of the communication based on the amount and type of errors
ENTERING EMERGING DEVELOPING EXPANDING BRIDGING
54321 6
REACHING
Linguistic Complexity
Level 1 – Entering
Single words
Level 2 – EmergingPhrases, short sentences
Level 3 – Developing
Series of related sentences
Level 4 – Expanding
Moderate discourse
Level 5 – Bridging
Complex discourse
Vocabulary Usage
Level 1 – Entering
Most common vocabulary
Level 2 – EmergingHigh frequency vocabulary
Level 3 – Developing
General and some specific vocabulary
Level 4 – Expanding
Specialized and some technical vocabulary
Level 5 – Bridging
Specialized and technical vocabulary
Language Control
Level 1 – Entering
Memorized language
Level 2 – EmergingLanguage w/ errors inhibiting
communication
Level 3 – Developing
Meaning overrides communication errors
Level 4 – Expanding
Language w/minimal errors
Level 5 – Bridging
Language comparable to English peers
Interaction of Performance Level
Definitions and ELLs’ AbilitiesLanguage Proficiency (Performance Level Descriptions)
1 Entering
2 Emerging
3 Developing
4 Expanding
5 Bridging
PIs
L 1
L 2
L 3
L4
L 5
Linguistic
Complexity
Vocabulary Usage
Language
Control
Presumed Competence:CAN DO Descriptors
The CAN DO Descriptors:
A tool for instruction used to find the instructional match based upon language proficiency
Discussion:
How can you use the CAN DO Descriptors to collaborate in meeting the ELLs’ needs?
Sample Teacher Prompts andQuestions for Each Stage of
Language ProficiencyEntering
Teacher Prompts: Questions starting with “Show me” “Circle the. . . ,” “Where is. . .?” and “Who has. . .?”
Sample Prompt: “Show me the wolf.”
Emerging
Teacher Prompts: Yes/no and either/or questions, questions with one- or two-word answers, lists, labels
Sample Question: “Did the brick house fall down?”
Developing
Teacher Prompts: Questions starting with “Why. . .?” “How. . .?” and “Explain. . .” phrase or short-sentence answers
Sample Prompt: “Explain why the third pig built his house out of bricks.”
Expanding
Teacher Prompts: Questions starting with “What would happen if. . .?” and “What do you think. . .?”
Sample Question: “Why do you think the pigs were able to outsmart the wolf?”
Bridging
Teacher Prompts: Questions starting with “Retell. . .” and “Decide Whether. . .”
Sample Prompt: “Accurately summarize the story.”
Sample Teacher Prompts andQuestions for Each Stage of
Language Proficiency
• Creation• Evaluation• Analysis• Application• Comprehension• Knowledge
Bloom’s Taxonomy
Relationship Between Bloom’s Taxonomy and
the Stages of Second Language Acquisition
Bloom’s Taxonomy
Creation
Evaluation
Analysis
Application
Comprehension
Knowledge
Stages Stages of SecondLanguage Acquisition
Bridging
Expanding
Developing
Emerging
Entering
Relationship Between Bloom’s Taxonomy and the
Stages of Second Language
Acquisition
Stages of Second Language Acquisition
Bloom’sTaxonomy
Best Practices for Instruction
• Phonics/Phonemic Awareness
• Vocabulary
• Syntax
• Comprehension
SyntaxWhat really matters about teaching syntax to ELLs from the perspective of a Reading Specialist or ESOL Teacher?
What resources would you use? Why?
What are some challenges or considerations for teaching syntax to ELLs?
How do listening and speaking integrate into the instruction of syntax for ELLs?
“There were two cupcakes in Philip Parker's lunch bag and Albert got a Hershey bar with almonds and Paul's mother gave him a piece of jelly roll that had little coconut sprinkles on the top. Guess whose mother forgot to put in dessert?”
Early1 Sight Word List
the of and a to in is you that it he was for on are as with his they I at be this have from or one had by word but not what all were we when your can said there use an each which she do how their if
The Challenge for ELLstheofandatoinis
you that it he wasforon
are as with histhey I at
be this havefromor onehad
by word but not what allwere
we whenyour can saidthereuse
an each
whichshe do how their
and as
but or
if
not there
if to
in on
for with
at from
by
he his
you your
they
their
I she
we it
the a
that
this
one all
an each
be
is are
have had
was were
can dosaid when wha
t
which
howword
Breakout JigsawFind your jigsaw group/topic by locating the table tent that is the same color as your note-taking sheet.
Discuss and take notes on one of the three topics related to ELLs with the facilitators at the tables: Comprehension Vocabulary Phonic/Phonemic awareness
Get back together with your original jigsaw group, take turns sharing the ideas you discussed with the topic group members and record notes in the appropriate sections.
Planning with School Team
How can you use
this information when working
with ELLs as a school team?
Next SessionSession #2:
February 29th
AM – teachers in schools Atholton ES – Jeffers Hill ES
PM – teachers in schools Laurel Woods ES – Worthington ES
Homework: Read article, ELL ‘Shadowing’ Brings
Instructional Gaps to Light that will be sent with the evaluation