Upload
votuyen
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
CLIENT:
Co-ords:
RL (m):
Job No.:
31-Mar-17
Probe I.DELECTRIC FRICTION-CONE PENETROMETER
CPT 24
Rig Type: 22 tonne truck (Merc)Tested in accordance with AS 1289.6.5.1-1999 and IRTP 2001 for friction reducer
JDS171243
Womarden, Near Three Springs
Proposed Solar Farm
JDSi Ground Engineering Pty Ltd
Refusal: 55MPa + Inclination
Approx. Water (m):
Dummy probe to (m): File: JD0042G
Cone I.D.: EC41
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
01
23
45
Friction Ratio Rf (%)
Dep
th (m
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
01
23
45
Tip Resistance qc (MPa)
Dep
th (m
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
01
23
45
Friction Sleeve fs (kPa)
Tip Resistance qc (MPa)
Dep
th (m
)
Tip
Res
ista
nce
Fric
tion
Slee
ve
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
CLIENT:
Co-ords:
RL (m):
Job No.:
31-Mar-17
Probe I.DELECTRIC FRICTION-CONE PENETROMETER
CPT 25
Rig Type: 22 tonne truck (Merc)Tested in accordance with AS 1289.6.5.1-1999 and IRTP 2001 for friction reducer
JDS171243
Womarden, Near Three Springs
Proposed Solar Farm
JDSi Ground Engineering Pty Ltd
Refusal: 80MPa
Approx. Water (m):
Dummy probe to (m): File: JD0055G
Cone I.D.: EC41
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
01
23
45
Friction Ratio Rf (%)
Dep
th (m
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
01
23
45
Tip Resistance qc (MPa)
Dep
th (m
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
01
23
45
Friction Sleeve fs (kPa)
Tip Resistance qc (MPa)
Dep
th (m
)
Tip
Res
ista
nce
Fric
tion
Slee
ve
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
CLIENT:
Co-ords:
RL (m):
Job No.:
31-Mar-17
Probe I.DELECTRIC FRICTION-CONE PENETROMETER
CPT 26
Rig Type: 22 tonne truck (Merc)Tested in accordance with AS 1289.6.5.1-1999 and IRTP 2001 for friction reducer
JDS171243
Womarden, Near Three Springs
Proposed Solar Farm
JDSi Ground Engineering Pty Ltd
Refusal: 65MPa
Approx. Water (m):
Dummy probe to (m): File: JD0054G
Cone I.D.: EC41
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
01
23
45
Friction Ratio Rf (%)
Dep
th (m
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
01
23
45
Tip Resistance qc (MPa)
Dep
th (m
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
01
23
45
Friction Sleeve fs (kPa)
Tip Resistance qc (MPa)
Dep
th (m
)
Tip
Res
ista
nce
Fric
tion
Slee
ve
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
CLIENT:
Co-ords:
RL (m):
Job No.:
31-Mar-17
Probe I.DELECTRIC FRICTION-CONE PENETROMETER
CPT 27
Rig Type: 22 tonne truck (Merc)Tested in accordance with AS 1289.6.5.1-1999 and IRTP 2001 for friction reducer
JDS171243
Womarden, Near Three Springs
Proposed Solar Farm
JDSi Ground Engineering Pty Ltd
Refusal:
Approx. Water (m):
Dummy probe to (m): File: JD0053G
Cone I.D.: EC41
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
01
23
45
Friction Ratio Rf (%)
Dep
th (m
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
01
23
45
Tip Resistance qc (MPa)
Dep
th (m
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
01
23
45
Friction Sleeve fs (kPa)
Tip Resistance qc (MPa)
Dep
th (m
)
Tip
Res
ista
nce
Fric
tion
Slee
ve
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
CLIENT:
Co-ords:
RL (m):
Job No.:
31-Mar-17
Probe I.DELECTRIC FRICTION-CONE PENETROMETER
CPT 28
Rig Type: 22 tonne truck (Merc)Tested in accordance with AS 1289.6.5.1-1999 and IRTP 2001 for friction reducer
JDS171243
Womarden, Near Three Springs
Proposed Solar Farm
JDSi Ground Engineering Pty Ltd
Refusal: 70MPa + Inclination
Approx. Water (m):
Dummy probe to (m): File: JD0050G
Cone I.D.: EC41
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
01
23
45
Friction Ratio Rf (%)
Dep
th (m
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
01
23
45
Tip Resistance qc (MPa)
Dep
th (m
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
01
23
45
Friction Sleeve fs (kPa)
Tip Resistance qc (MPa)
Dep
th (m
)
Tip
Res
ista
nce
Fric
tion
Slee
ve
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
CLIENT:
Co-ords:
RL (m):
Job No.:
31-Mar-17
Probe I.DELECTRIC FRICTION-CONE PENETROMETER
CPT 29
Rig Type: 22 tonne truck (Merc)Tested in accordance with AS 1289.6.5.1-1999 and IRTP 2001 for friction reducer
JDS171243
Womarden, Near Three Springs
Proposed Solar Farm
JDSi Ground Engineering Pty Ltd
Refusal:
Approx. Water (m):
Dummy probe to (m): File: JD0051G
Cone I.D.: EC41
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
01
23
45
Friction Ratio Rf (%)
Dep
th (m
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
01
23
45
Tip Resistance qc (MPa)
Dep
th (m
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
01
23
45
Friction Sleeve fs (kPa)
Tip Resistance qc (MPa)
Dep
th (m
)
Tip
Res
ista
nce
Fric
tion
Slee
ve
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
CLIENT:
Co-ords:
RL (m):
Job No.:
31-Mar-17
Probe I.DELECTRIC FRICTION-CONE PENETROMETER
CPT 30
Rig Type: 22 tonne truck (Merc)Tested in accordance with AS 1289.6.5.1-1999 and IRTP 2001 for friction reducer
JDS171243
Womarden, Near Three Springs
Proposed Solar Farm
JDSi Ground Engineering Pty Ltd
Refusal:
Approx. Water (m):
Dummy probe to (m): File: JD0052G
Cone I.D.: EC41
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
01
23
45
Friction Ratio Rf (%)
Dep
th (m
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
01
23
45
Tip Resistance qc (MPa)
Dep
th (m
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
01
23
45
Friction Sleeve fs (kPa)
Tip Resistance qc (MPa)
Dep
th (m
)
Tip
Res
ista
nce
Fric
tion
Slee
ve
170299 Solar Farm Three Springs BMP v1.1 ©2017 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 1
aBPP Group Pty Ltd | ABN: 39 166 551 784
1/42 Victoria Street Midland WA 6056
PO Box 3489 Midland WA 6936
08 6477 1144 | [email protected]
Bushfire Management Plan(Development Application)
Lot 1366 Wilson Road, Three Springs
Shire of Three Springs
Project Number: 170299
Assessment Date: 9 May 2017
Report Date: 24 May 2017
170299 Solar Farm Three Springs BMP v1.1 ©2017 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 2
Plan Details
BMP Template v5.7 ©2017 BPP Group Pty Ltd
Plan Version Submitted to Submitted Date
v1.0 Proponent 24-May-17
Plan Version Amendment Record Submitted Date
v1.1 Updated site layout 16-Jun-17
Compliance Statement
This Bushfire Management Plan (the Plan) meets the requirements of both the State Planning PolicyNo. 3.7: Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas (SPP 3.7) and the supporting Guidelines for Planning inBushfire Prone Areas (WAPC v1.1 2017; the ‘Guidelines’).
Author Bushfire Planning and Design (BPAD) Accreditation Signature
Alex Aitken Level 2 Bushfire Planning Practitioner BPAD37739
BPP Group Pty Ltd t/a Bushfire Prone Planning ACN: 39 166 551 784
Reviewed/Approved Bushfire Planning and Design (BPAD) Accreditation Signature
Kathy Nastov Level 3 Bushfire Planning and DesignPractitioner BPAD27794
BPP Group Pty Ltd t/a Bushfire Prone Planning ACN: 39 166 551 784
170299 Solar Farm Three Springs BMP v1.1 ©2017 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 3
Contents1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 5
2 APPLICATION OF SPP 3.7......................................................................................................... 7
3 COMMISSIONING AND THE LAND USE PROPOSAL ................................................................... 8
4 THE PLANNING SUBMISSION AND THE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED............................................ 12
5 ASSESSMENT OF BUSHFIRE RISK............................................................................................ 14
VEGETATION ASSESSMENT/CLASSIFICATION AND GROUND SLOPE..........................................................145.1.1 Existing Vegetation .............................................................................................................145.1.2 Vegetation Excluded from Classification.............................................................................205.1.3 Expected On-site Vegetation Changes Due to Proposed Subdivision or Development ......20
BUSHFIRE ATTACK LEVEL (BAL) ASSESSMENT – BAL CONTOURMAP ....................................................225.2.1 Construction of the BAL Contours - Statement of Site Data and ‘Separation DistanceRange’ Applied ................................................................................................................................265.2.2 BAL’s as Indicated / Determined by the Contour Map........................................................275.2.3 Identification of Specific Issues Arising from BAL Contour Map .........................................28
EXISTING HABITABLE BUILDINGS ON SUBJECT SITE – ASSESSED BAL’S ....................................................29
6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS..................................................................................... 30
NATIVE VEGETATION AND RE-VEGETATION........................................................................................30
7 BUSHFIRE RISK MANAGEMENT MEASURES ........................................................................... 32
THE BUSHFIRE PROTECTION CRITERIA – ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE...................................................32LOCATION OF BUILDINGS AND APPLICABLE BAL’S...............................................................................40VEGETATIONMANAGEMENT ..........................................................................................................41VEHICULAR ACCESS.......................................................................................................................42FIREFIGHTINGWATER SUPPLY ........................................................................................................46BUILDING CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS.............................................................................................46
7.6.1 Future Habitable Buildings on the Subject Site ...................................................................467.6.2 Existing Habitable Buildings on the Subject Site .................................................................47
8 SPECIFIC LAND USES.............................................................................................................. 48
HIGH RISK LAND USE – DEFINITION / APPLICATION / REQUIREMENTS ....................................................48
9 COMPLIANCE STATEMENTS - OF THE PROPOSAL AND THIS PLAN........................................... 50
STATE PLANNING POLICY NO. 3.7: PLANNING IN BUSHFIRE PRONE AREAS..............................................50GUIDELINES FOR PLANNING IN BUSHFIRE PRONE AREAS (WAPC V1.1 2017).........................................53BUSHFIRE PROTECTION CRITERIA (WAPC V1.1 2017 ‘GUIDELINES’) ....................................................53LOCAL VARIATIONS TO BUSHFIRE PROTECTION CRITERIA ......................................................................53WA BUILDING ACT 2011..............................................................................................................53AS 3959 CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS IN BUSHFIRE PRONE AREAS (2009 AS AMENDED) .......................54LOCAL GOVERNMENT FIREBREAK NOTICE..........................................................................................55
10 RESPONSIBILITIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION &MAINTENANCE................................................. 56
LANDOWNER / PROPONENT RESPONSIBILITIES (AND THOSE ACTING ON THEIR BEHALF)...............................56BUILDER RESPONSIBILITIES .............................................................................................................58LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITIES............................................................................................59
11 APPENDICES – ADVISORY INFORMATION ONLY..................................................................... 60
170299 Solar Farm Three Springs BMP v1.1 ©2017 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 4
Appendices
APPENDIX 1.................................................................................................................................. 60
THEWA FRAMEWORK FOR BUSHFIRE RISKMANAGEMENT ..............................................................................60
APPENDIX 2.................................................................................................................................. 65
BUSHFIRE RISK ASSESSMENT – UNDERSTANDING THEMETHODOLOGY ...............................................................65
APPENDIX 3.................................................................................................................................. 68
VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION EXCLUSIONS (AS 3959-2009 S2.2.3.2) .............................................................68
APPENDIX 4.................................................................................................................................. 69
ASSET PROTECTION ZONES (APZ) - DESCRIPTION, ESTABLISHMENT, MAINTENANCE AND STANDARDS......................69
APPENDIX 5.................................................................................................................................. 72
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS - BUSHFIRE PROTECTION CRITERIA (VEHICULAR ACCESS) ............................................72
APPENDIX 6.................................................................................................................................. 78
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS - BUSHFIRE PROTECTION CRITERIA (WATER) ............................................................78
DisclaimerThe measures contained in this Bushfire Management Plan are considered to be minimum standards and they do notguarantee that a building will not be damaged in a bushfire. This is substantially due to the unpredictable nature andbehaviour of fire and extreme weather conditions. Additionally, the achievement of and level of implementation ofbushfire management measures will depend, among other things, on the actions of the landowners or occupiers overwhich Bushfire Prone Planning has no control.
All surveys, forecasts, projections and recommendations made in this report associated with the project are made in goodfaith on the basis of information available to Bushfire Prone Planning at the time.
All maps included herein are indicative in nature and are not to be used for accurate calculations.
Notwithstanding anything contained therein, Bushfire Prone Planning will not, except as the law may require, be liablefor any loss or other consequences (whether or not due to the negligence of their consultants, their servants or agents)arising out of the services provided by their consultants.
Copyright NoticeThe format and certain content of this work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968,none of these parts may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without thepermission of BPP Pty Ltd of PO Box 3489 Midland WA 6936. This work was made in 2016.
As this material is in an electronic format, the removal or alteration of this material is prohibited by the Copyright Act incertain circumstances.
170299 Solar Farm Three Springs BMP v1.1 ©2017 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 5
1 Executive Summary
This Bushfire Management Plan (the Plan) has been prepared to accompany the developmentapplication for a solar photovoltaic panel farm at Lot 1366 Wilson Road, Three Springs within the Shireof Three Springs.
The development site of approximately 270 ha on part of the lot is within a designated bushfire pronearea and the Proposal requires the application of State Planning Policy No. 3.7: Planning in BushfireProne Areas (SPP 3.7). The assessed bushfire risk is considered to be manageable and will be achievedby the identified stakeholders implementing and maintaining the bushfire risk management measuresthat are presented in this Plan.
Assessment of the planned location, vegetation and consideration of planned infrastructure indicatesthat compliance is able to be achieved against all applicable bushfire related legislation, policy,standards and guidelines, including the Bushfire Protection Criteria.
The indicative BAL ratings that can be achieved by all proposed infrastructure is BAL-12.5 with theinstallation of 20m Asset Protection Zones (APZ) comprised of internal road network and low threatvegetation.
Vehicle access to the site will be by existing public roads that are proposed to be upgraded to allow theincreased traffic during construction period and allow semi-trailer vehicles to access the site. Theupgraded roads allow two way access for personnel to access and egress from the site in the event ofa bushfire. The access to the site is through cropped paddocks that allow vehicles to pass through inthe event of any bushfire incidents if required.
All internal access roads will be designed and constructed to allow semi-trailer vehicles access, andappropriate turn around areas that will also be suitable for 3.4 fire appliances. The internal roadnetwork will allow semi-trailer vehicles to move around site to all proposed infrastructure withoutissues.
There is currently a reticulated water supply to the development site for domestic purposes and theclosest hydrant is in the townsite of Three Springs about 28kmwest. It is proposed to install 2 x 50,000ltemergency water tanks for emergency services to utilise with the appropriate fittings and 3.4 fireappliance hardstand.
The existing homestead onsite has a BAL rating of BAL-12.5 that will be maintained with theappropriate separation distances. The proposed temporary workers accommodation to be utilisedduring the construction period for ~150 workers will be located in a BAL-12.5 area once the 20m APZis installed.
Future buildings within 100 metres of classified vegetation will be constructed to standards whichcorrespond to the determined BALs, as required by AS 3959-2009 Construction of buildings in bushfireprone areas.
170299 Solar Farm Three Springs BMP v1.1 ©2017 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 6
Implementation of a Asset Protection Zone (APZ) of 20m is proposed to be established around allproposed infrastructure including solar array, storage building, substation, temporary workersaccommodation and existing homestead. The visitors interpretation area will be comprised of acarpark, managed gardens, playground and ablution block and will be surrounded by low threatvegetation.
The proposed development of the solar array with a designed output to be 150MW to be linked intothe power grid is of a size that is classified as a high risk land use. The proposed development willgenerate power from solar photovoltaic (PV) panels within an existing cropped paddock.
At future planning stages an overall risk management plan will be developed for the construction andoperation stages of the development. This overall risk management plan will address bushfire risk andimplement mitigation and response procedures for bushfire related incidents.
170299 Solar Farm Three Springs BMP v1.1 ©2017 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 7
2 Application of SPP 3.7
The State Planning Policy No. 3.7: Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas (SPP 3.7) provides the foundationfor land use planning to address bushfire risk in Western Australia.
This Proposal must consider SPP 3.7 and, if required, comply with its policy measures. Thedetermination of this requirement is presented below.
Application of SPP 3.7 Policy Measures – Primary Triggers
The subject Proposal is a higher order strategic planning document, a strategic planningproposal or a subdivision or development application:
The project site is in a designated bushfire prone area on the WAMap of Bushfire ProneAreas:
The project site is not located in a designated bushfire prone area on the WA Map ofBushfire Prone Areas but the existing vegetation type and condition dictate that itshould be:
The project site is in an area not yet designated as bushfire prone but is proposed to bedeveloped in a way that introduces a bushfire hazard (Guidelines for Planning in BushfireProne Areas WAPC v1.1 2017 s3.2.2):
Application of SPP 3.7 Policy Measures – Secondary Trigger/s
The Proposal is a strategic planning proposal, subdivision or development applicationrelating to land that has or will have a Bushfire Hazard Level above low and/or where aBushfire Attack Level rating above BAL-LOW applies (SPP 3.7 s6.2):The subject Proposal is a development application for the construction or/and use of asingle house or ancillary dwelling on a lot or lots greater than 1100m2 and subject toBAL-40 or BAL-FZ (LPS Amendment Regulations 2015):
The subject Proposal is a development application for the construction or/and use of ahabitable building (other than a single house or ancillary dwelling), or a specifiedbuilding on any lot size and subject to a BAL rating above BAL-LOW (LPS AmendmentRegulations 2015):
170299 Solar Farm Three Springs BMP v1.1 ©2017 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 8
3 Commissioning and the Land Use Proposal
Bushfire Prone Planning (BPP Group Pty Ltd) has been commissioned to carry out the assessments andprepare the required bushfire planning documentation to accompany the proponent’s planningsubmission associated with their proposed land use project.
Commissioning Record
Landowner / Proponent: Earthed Australia Pty Ltd
BPP Commissioned by: Earthed Australia Pty Ltd
Purpose: To accompany a development application
Project Location
Subject Site and Address: Lot No. 1366 Wilson Road, Three Springs
Local Government: Shire of Three Springs
Zoning and R-Code: Rural
Project Description
Description: Development application for a 150MW solar farm.
Building Class: -
Lot Areas: Lot 1366- 8,497,535m2
170299SolarFarm
ThreeSpringsBM
Pv1.1
©2017
BPPGroup
PtyLtd
Page|9
Figure3.1:Proposed
developmentsite
plannorthern
sectionforLot1366
Wilson
Road,ThreeSprings
170299SolarFarm
ThreeSpringsBM
Pv1.1
©2017
BPPGroup
PtyLtd
Page|10
Figure3.1a:Proposed
developmentsite
plansouthern
sectionforLot1366
Wilson
Road,ThreeSprings
Sol
ar A
rray
Dwelling
Camp Site
Tourist Area
Shed
Shearing Shed
BatteryStorage
Sub-Station
Mid-voltage P
ower Line
OH 132KV TRANSMISSION
POWERLINE
OH 330KV TRANSMISSION
POWERLINE
OH
19.1KV DISTIBU
TOR
POW
ER
LINE
OH 19.1KV DISTIBUTOR
POWERLINE
UG
19.1KV
DISTIBU
TOR
POW
ER
LINE
SIMPSON RD
HUNT RD
SIMPSON RD
WIL
SON
RD
WIL
SON
RD
L O T M 1 3 6 6L O T M 1 3 6 6
Figure 3.2Proposed Development
___________ LEGEND ___________
Lot M1366Other Lots
Fire Protection+R Water Storage Tank
Proposed RoadProposed Powerline
[ [ Fence
Proposed BuildingClass 2Class 10(a)Solar ArrayOther
Existing BuildingClass 1(a)Class 10(a)
Disclaimer and Limitation: This map has been prepared for bushfire management planning purposes only. All depicted areas, contours and any dimensions shown are subject to survey. Bushfire Prone Planning does not guarantee that this map is without flaw of any kind and disclaims all liability for any errors, loss or other consequence which may arise from relying on any information depicted.
Lot M1366 on Diagram 5876 WomardenShire of Three Springs
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Metres
_________ SCALE (A3) _________
D U D A W AD U D A W AB O W G A D AB O W G A D A
P E R E N J O R IP E R E N J O R I
W O M A R D E NW O M A R D E N
__________ LOCALITY __________
pMap created on: 14/06/2017Map compiled by: Russell Wornes
Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50Projection: UniversalTransverse Mercator Units: Metre
Aerial Image: Landgate Nov 2016
170299 Solar Farm Three Springs BMP v1.1 ©2017 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 12
4 The Planning Submission and the Documents Required
Policy measures in SPP 3.7 (and further instruction in the associated document Guidelines for Planningin Bushfire Prone Areas WAPC v1.1 2017) set out the bushfire planning information (including bushfirerisk assessments) that are to accompany a planning submission. It is dependent on the type of proposaland stage of the development process. In most circumstances this information is to be presented inthe form of a Bushfire Management Plan (BMP).
This Bushfire Management Plan will include the information indicated by the check mark. If an item ischecked it is required by either: SPP 3.7 or by a local government variation. It may also have beenprepared at an earlier planning stage and therefore re-included or included by the assessor as itimproves the information presented in this Bushfire Management Plan.
BushfireHazardLevel
Assessment
BushfireAttackLevel
ContourMap
BushfireAttackLevel
Assessment
Identify anyissues arisingfrom the BALcontour map
or BALassessment
Identify andspecificallyaddress thelist of issuesrelated tostrategiclevel
planning anddefined in
theGuidelines
s5.2
Demonstratecompliancewith theBushfireProtectionCriteria canbe achieved
insubsequentplanningstages
Demonstratecompliancewith theBushfireProtectionCriteria
The Planning Submission – Stage and Specific Land Use or Development
Planning Stage: Development application
For Submission to: Shire of Three Springs
Project Type: Solar Power Station
‘Vulnerable’ Land Use: -
‘High Risk’ Land Use: Yes
‘Minor’ Development: -
‘Unavoidable’ Development: -