8/6/2019 Ego State Boundary Problems

1/5

uri cgaUu}'o l

D ie gnosis and Treatment ofEg tate Boundary Problem .

ffects n Self-E teem andQu lily f LifeGloria

hslr,:H.'1n""j ~,rch gl'm.l~'wascondueted dur~ng

an intensh ..eone-weekwarkshep In tevicow it'll th e. ilia. being h) lest I h~eJrCCL ,orl'r:lfls3c.I'imHI,1 3'nalys., i .~ ['IS "ch~i) i I lin ap 011p(lr~itipafl ts elf-esteum and qunlity o'flifc.This ~lrIi.dC'describes the 'I!or~hop and morra ns ac tlu na l a :DWYi,nstrum ents tha wen('~pcchiJl.yde igm~d :aTlli'~auriardiLed for 'I'hi'ssind '. l se in' trU J1J le 11'1-HH: DiagnosislrTvcnfulj Q~ go Stale Doundiilry Problemand the ~Ju3HI.y of Lile Inventory-c-can beL l : !mda . . (HOI I : :HO-Hc rn ols in ps chuth rap~ orfurther n arch.

P s yc ho t ..hi:l'llpy rna Ihe eonsiderabl ..hotterand rhe resulrs !-iighly sausfying '" tie l] eliai-eians Ike lilt ac.uunl th e dl[lgnllsl~ amItreutment uf

8/6/2019 Ego State Boundary Problems

2/5

Problem s, ibe Quality uf life 1(1 emory, :muthe C o pcrsrm th Self-E teem Inventory

DilHf,J1(.J.11}; Invcmorv ( I I E~fI ....MIt !rmar.lanProbl m . I he DJ:!g:!msl~ 1m entQI) of go"taM BOunlbl') Prohlcrne (D Il: p] has thrce'part . a qucstionnaiae. 3 ('~01()gICDI;1gno"lTable. and an C\ Jluat ll .l l1 (('11m.,The que-non-IMilT!." was Jio:SiO!:I1CJ wiginalij wnl: :-:5 q.ll;);,designed a I 1 J u-ed .;. rut exrernul r rucrra of\ alidil), The evaluunon pr,', IJ~" a \ elncle for! . n I.

(Jemcs. J974. 19 L 19 5) can be 1, 1 ed .1~p.

r h o : group was heteregeue u," and imerna-uonal, with ~ 1 pet' lple from the U nited tares,fl from Puerto RICD. I from A ustralia. 1 fromJapan. l rern 'an

8/6/2019 Ego State Boundary Problems

3/5

Qualu HI Llf!! IIJl'('rlWI1.' C )u.,lil) o f hfl' isdefined : 1 . . . . ."the modificauon olihr- rndiv idual'srl,.I\erllipll ui the degree ul li1elr weli-bcrng.'l,U"fa.:lIdll IIU.!th e v alu e III rhcir 0\\ n life, a:.~\ \ . : I ILL '> UI.C:Cfll"'.)(;II~ to "h;il~ Ihl.:-easpects withother hum,1Il b~'III!!\"(Nclrleg~l.P Q3). Th e()u~dll)' ,If[ ife Ifl\ClIII'f) 1(.,lUII .. h:\ ..ed on thechange III variables .,h"(:I,..:J III rm:.r\tlclpanl'ibe ore and o . l n . . : r prev iousv '~lk..Hlr" lell b y Dr.r rniho S.liJ .w u 11.1('0\ cr the 1 ... I:! years ..AI IiI'.I this in stru mc ru \\. ~ J c~ i~ rn (.'d \,\ ith .,-

ucms 11 Ib . . : answered U'>IJIl!:l L ik en scale , ," u hthe' aim nl mcnsunns 14 h) rWlhLtIt.:

O.JOlh1'JmH/I S, I/-I:.:HII III ln ell/on' ('(1 ipcr-'dlllLh 119071 u"finl. :l .. l, ! r- ': - ' L c r. :m ; 1$ 'J.ll,rM11l-.1/ lud[!TI](~nlof ~\,ortlune Ih:.n 1."C"irft'~M':U inIh~atutudes th e In.II\ IIj!J';.llltold to ward him-t'll It 1\ ::I,~ubJC : ; J TheCI.. 'pe-rsllll lh 'St:lf f~ ~11 !m In v t.:I1Lory leI} Iii ;Jpopular L ' < o l l h m has been u"eJ 111 l tl , \l l~ , i i I U i l ! ' "Lu cvuluate ....If."':i>tl!cm [l \\,.L... ':;tJrLd:lrdl7t'dwuh the 1 I : : " , u : ; : . I 1 1 [1Ufll.l lanon r n Pi'.!.l It " " I ~ -t(HIlS .15 item-, l,) be answered true or lulse.

I h e r e s u l t , ill' ( h k < : study were :111:dy/u:d III1\\ 11 ways: qU:II1III.III\('1 ' ! " T O qualnaav elyOilu[It~:1 1 ive \.nal~~i ~( f iJle.:'1: "Uhl.;;.:I .....1,1 re 'p,1lld\,d I,) I~ ,U "Ie"

1IP hy mail. T k~b \\ I!I1Cused I, I t:,IU1p:.l1L: till!resul .. ('I' [he tH I !llid Ihe(rbefore th e \h.)r\..~...1I" p, af ter Lhl' worbhnp. and ill f"I'IO\\1Jp.The re '\:In:::h In pl'IIII!~'" .md lheH outcome-are .unuuanzed . . . L . ~ , lillll'\\ 'iI B wnrkrng III a ~L"'l:n-Jay l\prJ..~h~lp111

\\ h rc h 1r;llb~I;,:II' II II amil} ,i~echruque- 1\l'H!'IIWd, a pu~lH\~ an d I~ndici lnl. ~hal1L~e i~produced a mcnsurcd hy 111l~ !.lU,Ihi" Il\-p' '.lh~'''I'' \~: 1 . " upported. \ I le~1 V.ia"U~I!'t! ro vompare lilt: meeu scores 1 all.~ U b l! : t h r . ; 1 11 I '" l in: ~~I l r\. .. . .hor \nlhillt: 1 1 1 1 " . ' , 1 1 ' 1,Ull1:"S or all ..uh)c...:l' .lft("r the \'\1 ~\....hop.lc("ortl1m.' ! \1 lh l . .. ..i,-I ale- ulth .. C,)lmlilY ,I[I Ife 111\e n r or v. I h e (L'"lIlh demu n ..tnU~tI I("hhLI!~': I n L i n : p l l l h : J .1 evulucuon exce 'J in~(h e ,II \ I levc!rl ~ IgndicaIKc. 1n tltel:\ alua-Iltm by

8/6/2019 Ego State Boundary Problems

4/5

Problems ,va" d ern .. nstrated to be a rracllcaiand usefultool M diagoosh IIIP") c:h"ib~I';]py.1(' be m ore effectiv e and 10 reuuo...ethe urne o rrreaenern, II I';' II

8/6/2019 Ego State Boundary Problems

5/5

inrc rnn uo nnl c harnc ren ssie n! the e p enmen -ta l gn'Hp

111 .1 ~tUi.ly s u c h 3< ; lh is w e lIl'iQ 1 1 < . 1 \ ' ( 'II c o n -sider lli.11 t h r r e su lt s ruigl.JI 1 1 < I ~ e been i n f l u -.:n':l:a II) the fkl"olHl:lli!,) :m \.l l dl ..,f Ill.: I\~"psych therapists. well as b g;O) transfer-crice lh;1 l In,.: puriicrpants estahhshed \\ ilhthem, ,e"ipeClall_ since the thersprsts are [;'\'0\\eH-~.I1\ll.vn. r c c ug ru ze d tr an e a c u c n al analy q.>.

l.unes M II'Jin Sc:I ~l;mmlll l! l" nU!(I]" ', on