1
Editorial: Nurses need to prevent the abuse of older people The abuse of older people is a world- wide problem. Older people in need of health and/or social care and services are vulnerable to the power, authority, attitudes and behaviours of others – mostly, care workers. For the majority of older people their experience of their relationships with care workers is pos- itive. However, for many others it is far from a positive experience and at worse, they experience abuse. ‘Action on elder abuse’ (UK, http:// www.elderabuse.org.uk/) defines abuse as ‘a single or repeated act or lack of appropriate action, occurring within any relationship where there is an expectation of trust, which causes harm or distress to an older person’. This definition empha- sizes the importance of two things in the care of older people – relationships and trust. It is widely recognized that rela- tionships between nurses and older peo- ple have the potential to be therapeutic, leading to positive outcomes from care and positive experiences of being cared for. Central to such a relationship (like all relationships) is ‘trust’. Abuse of all kinds eats away at this trust and whilst the erosion of trust can at best lead to care omissions, at worse it can lead to system- atic abuse of older people. Statistics from the National Centre on Elder Abuse (2006) in the USA suggest that elder abuse is on the increase. Findings from their 2004 survey of State Adult Protective Services suggested a 19.7% increase in reported incidents of abuse. Whilst in the UK, Cooper et al. (2006) suggest that cognitive impairment was the leading indicator of abuse among older people. Statistics about the prevalence of abuse among older people in healthcare settings are hard to come by. The most recent data collected by ‘Action on elder abuse’ sug- gest that 25% of all calls to their tele- phone helpline raised concerns about abuse in institutional settings. However, it is widely acknowledged that any data reporting the prevalence of elder-abuse have to be treated with caution as accu- rate monitoring is difficult to achieve because abuse is under-reported due to the complex psychosocial factors associ- ated with it. However, it is no secret that abuse continues in many healthcare set- tings and a lack of leadership in combat- ing abuse among care workers continues to be problematic. The ‘Commission for Health Improve- ment’ report into the abuse of older people in a mental health unit in Man- chester, UK, found that the abuse mani- fested itself through ‘old fashioned’ and ‘regimented nursing care’. In referring to this case (known as the Rowan Ward Report) (Commission for Health Impro- vement Investigations, 2003) during the launch of a new Royal College of Nursing Leadership Programme for nurses work- ing with older people, the government minister launching the initiative stated: I am pretty tough, but I had tears in my eyes about what had gone on. It was nurses and doctors who turned a blind eye because the abuse had become systematic. No one was the leader they should have been – people kept their mouths shut and their eyes closed. (Parish, 2005, p. 12) Many lessons have been learned from this case and greater attention has been paid to ensuring that care services are more rigorously monitored, clinical gov- ernance frameworks act to prevent and monitor abuse, leadership is streng- thened and that more carefully regulated standards of care are in place (Depart- ment of Health, 2005). How any evi- dence is translated and implemented into practice is problematic and it is no less the case for the prevention of abuse. Rich- ardson et al. (2002) for example identi- fied that an education intervention had only a limited impact preventing elder abuse and they suggested that the lack of identification, documentation and reporting of abuse limits the impact of most interventions. Studies such as this highlight an increasingly recognized real- ity that changing practices cannot hap- pen through a single intervention such as an education course. Practice cultures that harbour abuse tend to have deeply ingrained characteristics that are incon- sistent with clinical effectiveness and education alone cannot change these. Systematic approaches to changing such cultures that provide spaces for care workers, patients/residents and families to ‘have a voice’ are crucial or as the oft- cited phrase suggests, ‘when people who are not used to speaking are heard by people who are not used to listening then real changes can be made’. Staying quiet about elder abuse is not an option and is inconsistent with any standards of pro- fessional practice we may endorse. Brendan McCormack Co-editor, IJOPN E-mail: brendan.mccormack@ royalhospitals.n-i.nhs.uk References Commission for Health Improvement Investi- gations (2003) Investigation into Matters Arising from Care on Rowan Ward. Man- chester Mental Health and Social Care Trust, The Stationary Office, Norwich, UK. Cooper C., Katona C., Finne-Soveri H., Topinkova E., Carpenter I. & Livingston G. (2006) Indicators of elder abuse: a crossnational comparison of psychiatric morbidity and other determinants in the Ad-HOC study. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 14, 489–497. Department of Health (2005) No Secrets: Guidance on Developing and Implement- ing Multi-Agency Policies and Procedures to Protect Vulnerable Adults from Abuse. Department of Health, London, UK. National Centre on Elder Abuse (2006) Abuse of Adults 60þ 2004 Survey of Adult Protective Services, Fact Sheet. National Centre on Elder Abuse, Washington, DC. Parish C. (2005) Leadership programme will help prevent abuse of older people. Nur- sing Standard 19, 12. Richardson B., Kitchen G. & Livingston G. (2002) The effect of education on knowl- edge and management of elder abuse: a randomized controlled trial. Age and Ageing 31, 335–341. Ó 2006 The Author. Journal compilation Ó 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 193

Editorial: Nurses need to prevent the abuse of older people

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Editorial: Nurses need to prevent the abuse of older people

The abuse of older people is a world-wide problem. Older people in need ofhealth and/or social care and servicesare vulnerable to the power, authority,attitudes and behaviours of others –mostly, care workers. For the majorityof older people their experience of theirrelationships with care workers is pos-itive. However, for many others it is farfrom a positive experience and at worse,they experience abuse.

‘Action on elder abuse’ (UK, http://www.elderabuse.org.uk/) defines abuseas ‘a single or repeated act or lack ofappropriate action, occurring within anyrelationship where there is an expectationof trust, which causes harm or distress toan older person’. This definition empha-sizes the importance of two things in thecare of older people – relationships andtrust. It is widely recognized that rela-tionships between nurses and older peo-ple have the potential to be therapeutic,leading to positive outcomes from careand positive experiences of being caredfor. Central to such a relationship (like allrelationships) is ‘trust’. Abuse of all kindseats away at this trust and whilst theerosion of trust can at best lead to careomissions, at worse it can lead to system-atic abuse of older people. Statistics fromthe National Centre on Elder Abuse(2006) in the USA suggest that elder abuseis on the increase. Findings from their2004 survey of State Adult ProtectiveServices suggested a 19.7% increase inreported incidents of abuse. Whilst in theUK, Cooper et al. (2006) suggest thatcognitive impairment was the leadingindicator of abuse among older people.Statistics about the prevalence of abuseamong older people in healthcare settingsare hard to come by. The most recent datacollected by ‘Action on elder abuse’ sug-gest that 25% of all calls to their tele-phone helpline raised concerns aboutabuse in institutional settings. However,it is widely acknowledged that any datareporting the prevalence of elder-abusehave to be treated with caution as accu-rate monitoring is difficult to achieve

because abuse is under-reported due tothe complex psychosocial factors associ-ated with it. However, it is no secret thatabuse continues in many healthcare set-tings and a lack of leadership in combat-ing abuse among care workers continuesto be problematic.

The ‘Commission for Health Improve-ment’ report into the abuse of olderpeople in a mental health unit in Man-chester, UK, found that the abuse mani-fested itself through ‘old fashioned’ and‘regimented nursing care’. In referring tothis case (known as the Rowan WardReport) (Commission for Health Impro-vement Investigations, 2003) during thelaunch of a new Royal College of NursingLeadership Programme for nurses work-ing with older people, the governmentminister launching the initiative stated:

I am pretty tough, but I had tears in my eyes

about what had gone on. It was nurses and

doctors who turned a blind eye because the

abuse had become systematic. No one was

the leader they should have been – people

kept their mouths shut and their eyes closed.

(Parish, 2005, p. 12)

Many lessons have been learned fromthis case and greater attention has beenpaid to ensuring that care services aremore rigorously monitored, clinical gov-ernance frameworks act to prevent andmonitor abuse, leadership is streng-thened and that more carefully regulatedstandards of care are in place (Depart-ment of Health, 2005). How any evi-dence is translated and implemented intopractice is problematic and it is no less thecase for the prevention of abuse. Rich-ardson et al. (2002) for example identi-fied that an education intervention hadonly a limited impact preventing elderabuse and they suggested that the lack ofidentification, documentation andreporting of abuse limits the impact ofmost interventions. Studies such as thishighlight an increasingly recognized real-ity that changing practices cannot hap-

pen through a single intervention such asan education course. Practice culturesthat harbour abuse tend to have deeplyingrained characteristics that are incon-sistent with clinical effectiveness andeducation alone cannot change these.Systematic approaches to changing suchcultures that provide spaces for careworkers, patients/residents and familiesto ‘have a voice’ are crucial or as the oft-cited phrase suggests, ‘when people whoare not used to speaking are heard bypeople who are not used to listening thenreal changes can be made’. Staying quietabout elder abuse is not an option and isinconsistent with any standards of pro-fessional practice we may endorse.

Brendan McCormackCo-editor, IJOPNE-mail: [email protected]

References

Commission for Health Improvement Investi-

gations (2003) Investigation into MattersArising from Care on Rowan Ward. Man-

chester Mental Health and Social CareTrust, The Stationary Office, Norwich, UK.

Cooper C., Katona C., Finne-Soveri H.,

Topinkova E., Carpenter I. & Livingston

G. (2006) Indicators of elder abuse: acrossnational comparison of psychiatric

morbidity and other determinants in the

Ad-HOC study. American Journal ofGeriatric Psychiatry 14, 489–497.

Department of Health (2005) No Secrets:Guidance on Developing and Implement-ing Multi-Agency Policies and Proceduresto Protect Vulnerable Adults from Abuse.

Department of Health, London, UK.

National Centre on Elder Abuse (2006)

Abuse of Adults 60þ 2004 Survey of AdultProtective Services, Fact Sheet. National

Centre on Elder Abuse, Washington, DC.

Parish C. (2005) Leadership programme will

help prevent abuse of older people. Nur-sing Standard 19, 12.

Richardson B., Kitchen G. & Livingston G.

(2002) The effect of education on knowl-edge and management of elder abuse: a

randomized controlled trial. Age andAgeing 31, 335–341.

� 2006 The Author. Journal compilation � 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 193