3
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Urology Volume 2012, Article ID 681918, 2 pages doi:10.1155/2012/681918 Editorial Advances in Prosthetic Urology Gerard D. Henry, 1 Andrew C. Kramer, 2 Rafael E. Carrion, 3 and Brian Christine 4 1 Department of Urology, Regional Urology, 255 Bert Kouns, Shreveport, LA 71199, USA 2 Department of Urology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA 3 Department of Urology, USF College of Medicine, South Tampa Center for Advanced Healthcare, Tampa, FL 33606, USA 4 Erectile Restoration and Prosthetic Urology, Urology Centers of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35209, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Gerard D. Henry, [email protected] Received 5 November 2012; Accepted 5 November 2012 Copyright © 2012 Gerard D. Henry et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) has become the gold standard treatment for erectile dysfunction among men refractory to medical therapies. Among the many treatments for erectile dysfunction, implantation of a penile prosthesis has been associated with high patient satisfaction rates and low mechanical failure rates. In this special issue, seven articles are presented, including primary research, reviews, and methodological reports, to highlight outcomes related to patient satisfaction with IPPs, advances in surgical place- ment techniques, and methods for penile size enhancement concomitant with implant placement. The safety and ecacy of the IPP have been well documented, but in spite of this, urologists may be reluctant to oer an IPP to older patients due to various concerns, including impaired dexterity of older patients and their ability to operate an inflatable device. To determine the outcomes of and satisfaction with the multicomponent IPP in the elderly male, Villarreal and Jones retrospectively assessed patients using chart review and telephone interview. To analyze overall patient satisfaction with IPPs with a consistent approach, Bernal and Henry conducted a review of the literature over the past 20 years. Nine articles met inclusion criteria for analysis and data collation. Despite the fact that varied metrics were used to determine patient satisfaction, they found that patients in general were very satisfied with their three-piece IPPs and restoration of sexual function, and they identified common reasons for patient dissatisfaction. The number one patient complaint after IPP placement is loss of penile length. One IPP company has recently remade a product that has longer length cylinders than those formerly available. However, traditionally, longer cylinders were believed to lack axial rigidity. Henry et al. present a prospective, multicenter research study, performed on the new product to address this concern. In a methodol- ogy report, Hakky et al. present an overview of various techniques performed concomitantly with IPP placement surgery to enhance penile length and girth. Outcomes can be improved by combining the use of adjunct surgical techniques; these adjuvant procedures are a key addition in the armamentarium for the serious implant surgeon. In two methodological articles, surgical techniques and outcomes are described related to surgical treatment of erectile dysfunction. First, Martinez et al. describe common surgical techniques for treatment of Peyronie’s disease, a clinical condition that interferes with erectile function. Despite attempts to uncover the pathophysiology behind Peyronie’s disease, it remains an enigma, with a reported incidence that is rising, in part because more men come forth to seek treatment. Second, Karpman reports on a streamlined approach for infrapubic placement of an IPP. A better understanding of operative techniques and recent clinical outcome studies have led to an evolution of the original infrapubic approach with significant contributions by Dr. Perito as discussed in the erratica. Small incisions and ecient operative maneuvers can shorten operative times and expedite postoperative recovery. Finally, Henry et al. present a review of outcomes for subarachnoid versus general anesthesia during IPP surgery. The leading patient complaint during the perioperative period for penile prosthesis implantation is postoperative pain, while emesis and urticaria also aect the procedure’s

Editorial AdvancesinProstheticUrologydownloads.hindawi.com/journals/au/2012/681918.pdf · 2019-07-31 · ment techniques, and methods for penile size enhancement concomitant with

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Editorial AdvancesinProstheticUrologydownloads.hindawi.com/journals/au/2012/681918.pdf · 2019-07-31 · ment techniques, and methods for penile size enhancement concomitant with

Hindawi Publishing CorporationAdvances in UrologyVolume 2012, Article ID 681918, 2 pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/681918

Editorial

Advances in Prosthetic Urology

Gerard D. Henry,1 Andrew C. Kramer,2 Rafael E. Carrion,3 and Brian Christine4

1 Department of Urology, Regional Urology, 255 Bert Kouns, Shreveport, LA 71199, USA2 Department of Urology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA3 Department of Urology, USF College of Medicine, South Tampa Center for Advanced Healthcare, Tampa, FL 33606, USA4 Erectile Restoration and Prosthetic Urology, Urology Centers of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35209, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Gerard D. Henry, [email protected]

Received 5 November 2012; Accepted 5 November 2012

Copyright © 2012 Gerard D. Henry et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons AttributionLicense, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properlycited.

The inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) has become the goldstandard treatment for erectile dysfunction among menrefractory to medical therapies. Among the many treatmentsfor erectile dysfunction, implantation of a penile prosthesishas been associated with high patient satisfaction rates andlow mechanical failure rates. In this special issue, sevenarticles are presented, including primary research, reviews,and methodological reports, to highlight outcomes relatedto patient satisfaction with IPPs, advances in surgical place-ment techniques, and methods for penile size enhancementconcomitant with implant placement.

The safety and efficacy of the IPP have been welldocumented, but in spite of this, urologists may be reluctantto offer an IPP to older patients due to various concerns,including impaired dexterity of older patients and theirability to operate an inflatable device. To determine theoutcomes of and satisfaction with the multicomponent IPPin the elderly male, Villarreal and Jones retrospectivelyassessed patients using chart review and telephone interview.To analyze overall patient satisfaction with IPPs with aconsistent approach, Bernal and Henry conducted a reviewof the literature over the past 20 years. Nine articles metinclusion criteria for analysis and data collation. Despitethe fact that varied metrics were used to determine patientsatisfaction, they found that patients in general were verysatisfied with their three-piece IPPs and restoration of sexualfunction, and they identified common reasons for patientdissatisfaction.

The number one patient complaint after IPP placementis loss of penile length. One IPP company has recentlyremade a product that has longer length cylinders than those

formerly available. However, traditionally, longer cylinderswere believed to lack axial rigidity. Henry et al. presenta prospective, multicenter research study, performed onthe new product to address this concern. In a methodol-ogy report, Hakky et al. present an overview of varioustechniques performed concomitantly with IPP placementsurgery to enhance penile length and girth. Outcomes canbe improved by combining the use of adjunct surgicaltechniques; these adjuvant procedures are a key addition inthe armamentarium for the serious implant surgeon.

In two methodological articles, surgical techniques andoutcomes are described related to surgical treatment oferectile dysfunction. First, Martinez et al. describe commonsurgical techniques for treatment of Peyronie’s disease, aclinical condition that interferes with erectile function.Despite attempts to uncover the pathophysiology behindPeyronie’s disease, it remains an enigma, with a reportedincidence that is rising, in part because more men comeforth to seek treatment. Second, Karpman reports on astreamlined approach for infrapubic placement of an IPP.A better understanding of operative techniques and recentclinical outcome studies have led to an evolution of theoriginal infrapubic approach with significant contributionsby Dr. Perito as discussed in the erratica. Small incisions andefficient operative maneuvers can shorten operative timesand expedite postoperative recovery.

Finally, Henry et al. present a review of outcomes forsubarachnoid versus general anesthesia during IPP surgery.The leading patient complaint during the perioperativeperiod for penile prosthesis implantation is postoperativepain, while emesis and urticaria also affect the procedure’s

Page 2: Editorial AdvancesinProstheticUrologydownloads.hindawi.com/journals/au/2012/681918.pdf · 2019-07-31 · ment techniques, and methods for penile size enhancement concomitant with

2 Advances in Urology

perceived success. This paper retrospectively reviews 90consecutive, primary inflatable penile prosthetic operationsperformed by a single surgeon at one private medical center.

As erectile dysfunction is highly prevalent in our soci-ety, increasing with age, and life expectancy continues toincrease, continued research and development regardingIPPs remain an important area of work.

Gerard D. HenryAndrew C. Kramer

Rafael E. CarrionBrian Christine

Page 3: Editorial AdvancesinProstheticUrologydownloads.hindawi.com/journals/au/2012/681918.pdf · 2019-07-31 · ment techniques, and methods for penile size enhancement concomitant with

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Stem CellsInternational

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Behavioural Neurology

EndocrinologyInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Disease Markers

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

BioMed Research International

OncologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

PPAR Research

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

ObesityJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

OphthalmologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Diabetes ResearchJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Research and TreatmentAIDS

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Parkinson’s Disease

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com