10
Nicole Varble Material Selection DRIL Project June 25, 2010 Contents Compliance Testing Bill of Materials for Specified Material Groups Material Groups Tubing Flow Probes Tubing Connectors Hand Compliance Chamber Pressure Monitoring and Custom Connectors Compliance Testing Goal: 12 Tubes were tested for static compliance and the tubing that most resembled the compliance of the artery and that of the vein will be used to model the vasculature of the arm. Aspects important to design: Flexible Adaptable to barbed fittings Comparable compliance to human arteries Comparable compliances to human veins Circular Preferably optically clear Materials: 4 different samples of Tygon PVC tubing 3 different samples of silicon tubing 2 samples of latex 2 samples of polyurethane Procedure: Samples were cut to 30cm length, were filled completely with water and placed in the test setup shown below. (Figure 1) The pressure transducer was bled so the entire test loop was filled with water. A syringe connected to the 3-way Luer Lock was used to put a controlled increase in volume into the tube. The resulting increase in pressure was recorded. 1

edge.rit.eduedge.rit.edu/content/DRIL_Modeling/public/Nicole_Varb… · Web viewTable 2 below summarizes the percentage differences in the found compliances compared to actual compliances

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: edge.rit.eduedge.rit.edu/content/DRIL_Modeling/public/Nicole_Varb… · Web viewTable 2 below summarizes the percentage differences in the found compliances compared to actual compliances

Nicole VarbleMaterial SelectionDRIL ProjectJune 25, 2010

ContentsCompliance TestingBill of Materials for Specified Material Groups

Material GroupsTubingFlow ProbesTubing ConnectorsHand Compliance ChamberPressure Monitoring and Custom Connectors

Compliance Testing

Goal: 12 Tubes were tested for static compliance and the tubing that most resembled the compliance of the artery and that of the vein will be used to model the vasculature of the arm.

Aspects important to design:FlexibleAdaptable to barbed fittingsComparable compliance to human arteriesComparable compliances to human veinsCircularPreferably optically clear

Materials: 4 different samples of Tygon PVC tubing3 different samples of silicon tubing2 samples of latex2 samples of polyurethane

Procedure: Samples were cut to 30cm length, were filled completely with water and placed in the test setup shown below. (Figure 1) The pressure transducer was bled so the entire test loop was filled with water. A syringe connected to the 3-way Luer Lock was used to put a controlled increase in volume into the tube. The resulting increase in pressure was recorded.

1

Page 2: edge.rit.eduedge.rit.edu/content/DRIL_Modeling/public/Nicole_Varb… · Web viewTable 2 below summarizes the percentage differences in the found compliances compared to actual compliances

Nicole VarbleMaterial SelectionDRIL ProjectJune 25, 2010

Figure 1: Test setup

Compliance of a vessel is defined using the relationship as described in Equation 1 below:

C=∆V∆P

Equation 1: Calculation of Compliance

Where C is compliance, ∆V is the change in volume in mL or mm3, and ∆P is the change in mmHg. Compliance can be calculated mL/mmHg, mm3/mmHg, or by dividing by the length of the sample (30 cm) in mm2/mmHg. Finding the cross-sectional compliance, however, does not account for length change.

After a literature search, (Kassab 2008, Henriken 2000, Grassi 1995), compliance of arteries and veins can be defined as below in Table 1. The veins are assumed to be 3 times the compliance of arteries (Chandran 1992).

Actual CompliancemL/mmHg mm3/mmHg mm2/mmHg

Artery 0.00121 1.21 0.004033Vein 0.0036 3.63 0.0121

Table 1: Actual Compliance of Arteries and Veins

Results: After the change in pressure was recorded after a known volume change, the percentage difference of each of the tubes in relation to the actual compliance levels of arteries and veins was calculated.

2

syringe

Pressure transducer

Test Piece

3-way Leur lock valve

Page 3: edge.rit.eduedge.rit.edu/content/DRIL_Modeling/public/Nicole_Varb… · Web viewTable 2 below summarizes the percentage differences in the found compliances compared to actual compliances

Nicole VarbleMaterial SelectionDRIL ProjectJune 25, 2010

Table 2 below summarizes the percentage differences in the found compliances compared to actual compliances. As shown, T3, or Tygon PVC tubing type 3, is the most comparable to arteries, and T1, or Tygon PVC tubing type 1 most resembles veins.

Material Artery Vein% diff % diff

T1 250.74% 16.91%T2 43.80% 52.07%T3 1.64% 66.12%T4 47.82% 82.61%S0 93.58% 35.47%

S0-2 101.04% 32.99%S6 14.21% 61.93%S7 44.43% 81.48%

S10 15.68% 71.89%L8 286.89% 28.96%L9 449.88% 83.29%

P11 23.86% 74.62%P12 69.57% 89.86%

Minimum 1.64% 16.91%

Table 2: Percentage difference between 12 types of tubing and actual artery and vein compliance

The tubing therefore chosen for the arterial side of the physical model is T3, and for the venous side, T1.

The complete analysis can be found in at:https://edge.rit.edu/content/DRIL_Modeling/public/Nicole_Varble/Tubing_Compliance2.xlsl

Tubing Based on the compliance testing the following tubing in Table 3 will be used.

Tubing BOMPart ID OD Company Part # Quantity1" T3 Tygon Tubing 1" 1-1/4" McMaster 5553k51 6'1/2" T3 Tygon Tubing 1/2" 5/8" McMaster 5553k18 3'1/4" T3 Tygon Tubing 1/4" 3/8" McMaster 5553k13 10'1/8" T3 Tygon Tubing 1/8" 1/4" McMaster 5553k24 16'1/2" T1 Tygon Tubing 1/2" 5/8" McMaster 5894k19 3'1/4" T1 Tygon Tubing 1/4" 3/8" McMaster 5894k14 6'1/8" T1 Tygon Tubing 1/8" 1/4" McMaster 5894k12 8'

Table 3: Tubing Bill of Materials (BOM)

3

Page 4: edge.rit.eduedge.rit.edu/content/DRIL_Modeling/public/Nicole_Varb… · Web viewTable 2 below summarizes the percentage differences in the found compliances compared to actual compliances

Nicole VarbleMaterial SelectionDRIL ProjectJune 25, 2010

Flow Probes

Based on the specified tubing, one of the three following flow meters will be able to be adapted to any part of the physical model.

Flow Meter BOMPart OD ID x Wall Part # Company Quantity1/8" Flow Meter 1/4" 1/8" x 1/16" ME-PXL, 4 PXL Transonic Systems 11/4" Flow Meter 3/8" 1/4" x 1/16" ME-PXL, 6 PXL Transonic Systems 11/2" Flow Meter 5/8" 1/2" x 1/16" ME-PXL, 10 PXL Transonic Systems 1

Table 4: Flow Meter Bill of Materials

4

Page 5: edge.rit.eduedge.rit.edu/content/DRIL_Modeling/public/Nicole_Varb… · Web viewTable 2 below summarizes the percentage differences in the found compliances compared to actual compliances

Nicole VarbleMaterial SelectionDRIL ProjectJune 25, 2010

Connectors

Based on the schematic below, Figure 2, the tubing connectors are specified in Table 5.

Figure 2: Schematic of Arm Flow Loop with tube diameters and numbered connectors

5

Page 6: edge.rit.eduedge.rit.edu/content/DRIL_Modeling/public/Nicole_Varb… · Web viewTable 2 below summarizes the percentage differences in the found compliances compared to actual compliances

Nicole VarbleMaterial SelectionDRIL ProjectJune 25, 2010

Connectors BOMPart Size Company Part # Quantity # in ModelBarbed Reducing Tee 1" x 1" x 1/2" dripworksusa BRT112 2 1, 13Reducing Coupler 1/2" x 1/4" McMaster 2974K267 1 pack of 10 2, 12Reducing Tee 1/4" x 1/4" x 1/8" McMaster 5117k33 1 pack of 10 3Wye 1/4" McMaster 5117k97 1 pack of 10 4, 5, 6, 11Reducing Y connector 1/8" x 1/8" x 1/4" Cole- Parmer EW-3072651 1 pack of 10 7Wye 1/8" McMaster 5117k67 1 pack of 10 8, 9Check Valve Reducer 1/8" x 1/4" Ark- Plastics AP19CV012R25NN ** 10Resistance Valve 1" McMaster 5209k49 ** 25

Table 5: Tubing Connectors Bill of Materials** does not need to be ordered

Hand Compliance Chamber

Figure 3 below is a schematic of the hand compliance chamber. Table 6 below gives the required materials to construct the hand compliance chamber.

Figure 3: Hand Compliance Chamber

Hand Compliance Chamber BOMPart Size Company Part # Quantity # in Model

Barbed Tee 1/8" McMaster 5121k731 1 pack of 10 14Male Barbed Adapter 1/8" McMaster 2974k124 1 pack of 10 15

Thru Wall Barbed adapter

5/32" McMaster 2974k811 1 pack of 10 18, 19

PETG Tube 1-1/2" McMaster 9245k45 1' 21PETG Sheets 12" x 12" x 3/16" McMaster 85815k15 1 22, 23

Sphygmomanometer - Uniquelyuniforms

** 1 24

Table 6: Hand Compliance Chamber Bill of Materials

6

Page 7: edge.rit.eduedge.rit.edu/content/DRIL_Modeling/public/Nicole_Varb… · Web viewTable 2 below summarizes the percentage differences in the found compliances compared to actual compliances

Nicole VarbleMaterial SelectionDRIL ProjectJune 25, 2010

** does not need to be ordered

Pressure Monitoring and Custom Connectors

Pressure will be monitored at each junction via a small stainless steel metal tube and leur lock stopcock assembly.

Pressure Monitoring and Custom Connector BOMPart ID x OD Company Part # QuantityLeur Stopcock Assembly - Cole- Parmer EW- 3052604 1 pack of 10SS Metal tubing .07" x .063" McMaster 5560k23 1- 3' length1/4" SS Tubing .251" x .2812 McMaster 6100k235 11/8" SS Tubing .126" x .1562" McMaster 6100k192 1

Table 7: Pressure Monitoring and Custom Connector Bill of Materials

Additional items (cart, flexible adhesive, storage containers) will be purchased at Lowe’s or Home-depot. Cost estimation for the above specified parts (without shipping and not including the flow probes) is approximately $300.

A complete Bill of Materials can be found on the ‘BOM’ worksheet at:https://edge.rit.edu/content/DRIL_Modeling/public/Nicole_Varble/Tubing_Compliance2.xlsl

7