EASO Annual Training Report 2014 · 2018-04-19 · EASO — ANNUAL TRAINING REPORT 2014 — 7 1. Progress in the implementation of the ... • In 2014 every trainer who completed

SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION

European Asylum Support Office

EASOAnnual Training Report2014

July 2015

European Asylum Support Office

SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION

EASOAnnual Training Report2014

Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union.

Freephone number (*):

00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11(*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00800 numbers or these calls

may be billed.

More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu).

Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015

Print ISBN 978-92-9243-501-1 doi:10.2847/590466 BZ-01-15-569-EN-C

PDF SBN 978-92-9243-502-8 doi:10.2847/57349 BZ-01-15-569-EN-N

© European Asylum Support Office, 2015

Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained herein.

Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.

Printed in Luxembourg

Contents

Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 5

1. ProgressintheimplementationoftheEASOTrainingCurriculumwithregardtoEU+Statesandotherstakeholders ................................................................................................................ 7

2. ProfileofparticipantsfromEU+StatesandotherstakeholdersintheEASOTrainingCurriculum ........ 17

3. ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminEU+Statesandotherstakeholders: Analysisbymodule ........................................................................................................................................ 19

4. EU+StatesEASOtrainingfactsheets,2014 ................................................................................................. 474.1. Austria ................................................................................................................................................. 474.2. Belgium ............................................................................................................................................... 524.3. Bulgaria ................................................................................................................................................ 584.4. Croatia ................................................................................................................................................. 644.5. Cyprus .................................................................................................................................................. 704.6. Czech Republic .................................................................................................................................... 764.7. Denmark .............................................................................................................................................. 814.8. Estonia ................................................................................................................................................. 854.9. Finland ................................................................................................................................................. 894.10. France .................................................................................................................................................. 954.11. Germany ............................................................................................................................................ 1014.12. Greece ............................................................................................................................................... 1074.13. Hungary ............................................................................................................................................. 1134.14. Ireland ............................................................................................................................................... 1194.15. Italy .................................................................................................................................................... 1254.16. Latvia ................................................................................................................................................. 1314.17. Lithuania ............................................................................................................................................ 1354.18. Luxembourg ...................................................................................................................................... 1394.19. Malta ................................................................................................................................................. 1454.20. Netherlands ...................................................................................................................................... 1494.21. Norway .............................................................................................................................................. 1564.22. Poland ................................................................................................................................................ 1624.23. Portugal ............................................................................................................................................. 1684.24. Romania ............................................................................................................................................ 1724.25. Slovakia .............................................................................................................................................. 1784.26. Slovenia ............................................................................................................................................. 1844.27. Spain .................................................................................................................................................. 1904.28. Sweden .............................................................................................................................................. 1944.29. Switzerland ........................................................................................................................................ 2004.30. United Kingdom ................................................................................................................................ 206

EASO — ANNUAL TRAINING REPORT 2014 — 5

Introduction

Note:

This report draws upon data provided by the EASO Training Cockpit from 2010 onwards. Its purpose is to measure progress in the implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum and does not intend to provide any data on any other national training available in EU+ States and by other stakeholders (1).

At the current stage, the EASO Training Cockpit is only counting training participants. Hence an individual attending several training sessions will be counted several times.

Data is generated from the registration list of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum (national train-ing and train‑the‑trainers’ sessions) provided by EU+ States and other stakeholders.

The EASO Training Cockpit only records participants who have completed a full training session (e‑learning session + face‑to‑face session). Therefore divergence of data between the EASO Training Cockpit and the Member States’ records may result when EASO has not been informed that a participant did not complete a full training session (no update in the registration list).

Reference to the date of a session is made in the beginning of the online training course. Therefore, two online training sessions with two different online start dates but with the same face‑to‑face dates and the same trainers will be counted as two sessions. Moreover, a national training session with an online session starting in December 2014 followed by a face‑to‑face session in January 2015 will be included in the 2014 records.

(1) All training delivered in non-EU+ States and/or by external partners (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees – UNHCR, Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation – ACCORD, Prague Process, Quality Initiative in Eastern Europe and South Caucasus – QIEE, etc.).


1. Progress in the implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum with regard to EU+ States and other stakeholders

Progress in the implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum is monitored and analysed on the basis of the following data:

• the number of participants in the EASO training modules,

• the number of participants per module,

• the number of train-the-trainers’ sessions and national training,

• the number of train-the-trainers’ sessions and national training per module,

• the evolution in the top 5 EASO training modules.

It is important to note that the records only take into account the absolute number of training participants. The graphs do not take into account the relative size of each national authority. This means that some Member States appear as low-ranking in absolute number even if a significant amount of staff therein has undergone training in the EASO Training Curriculum.

a) TrendsinparticipationintheEASOTrainingCurriculum(EU+Statesandotherstakeholders)

Graph1:Trainingprogressfrom2010to2014(nationaltraining+train‑the‑trainers’sessions)

641

1332 1234

2158

2819

0

50

100

150

200

250

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

Number of participants and sessions in EASO TrainingCurriculum in EU+ States and Other (2010-2014)

Participants Sessions

8 — EASO — ANNUAL TRAINING REPORT 2014

Graph2:Trainingprogressbyquarterfrom2010to2014(nationaltraining+train‑the‑trainers’sessions)

Graph3:Trainingprogress2013vs2014

Graph4:Trainingprogressfrom2010to2014bystate,includingotherstakeholders (nationaltraining+train‑the‑trainers’sessions)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

104 148 187 202

308

508

282 234

363 359

131

381

764

493

300

601

707 785

510

817

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

Number of participants and sessions (quarterly)

Linear (Participants) Participants Sessions

169 141

1989 2158

286 179

2533 2819

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Train-the-Trainersparticipants

National trainingsessions

National trainingparticipants

Total participantstrained

Participation in the EASO Training Curriculum 2013 vs. 2014

2013 2014

2005

1062 1032

788 704

419

304 297 207 161 157 142 111 107 104 97 79 66 51 45 44 44 37 30 25 17 15 13 11 6 3 1

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

SE

OTH

ER

NL BE

EL

FI

FR

DE

HU

CZ

PL

RO

IE

CH

IT

SK

AT

LU

BG

SI

CY

MT

HR LV

NO

DK EE

UK LT

ES

PT

IS

Number of participants in national trainings and train-the-trainers'sessions in EU + States and other stakeholders (2010-2014)

6

111 107 104 97

79

66

51 45 44 44

37 30

25

17 15 13 11 3 1

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

IE

CH

IT

SK

AT

LU

BG

SI

CY

MT

HR LV

N

O

DK EE

U

K LT

ES

PT

IS

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Graph5:ParticipationintheEASOTrainingCurriculumin2014bystate,includingotherstakeholders(nationaltraining+train‑the‑trainers’sessions)

Summary

• The steady increase in the implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum has been confirmed with a rise of 31 % in participation in the EASO training modules in 2014 compared to 2013.

• In 2014 some 2,819 asylum officials from EU+ States were trained in the EASO Training Curriculum compared to 2,158 in 2013 (+31 %).

• Some 286 asylum officials have been trained in 2014 to become national trainers, representing an increase of 70 % in comparison with 2013.

• The increase is also visible in the number of national training sessions (179 sessions organised in 2014 compared to 141 sessions in 2013) and in the number of participants in national training (2,533 par-ticipants in 2014 compared to 1,989 in 2013).

• In 2014 every trainer who completed train-the-trainers’ session in the EASO training module has trained on average 8.8 participants at national level (so-called multiplier effect).

• Between 2012 and 2014 the multiplier effect amounted to 9.7 participants trained at Member States’ level by every person who completed the train-the-trainers’ session in the EASO Training Curriculum.

750

436 392

211 187 170 157

95 77 47 40 36 35 35 34 24 16 13 12 9 8 8 6 6 5 2 2 2 2 1 1

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

SE

NL

OTH

ER

BE

DE EL

HU

IT

FI

BG

SI

RO

SK

FR

HR CY

PL

LU

IE

CH

MT LV

LT

NO

DK CZ

UK AT

EE

PT

IS

Number of participants in National Trainingsand Train-the-Trainers' sessions in EU+ and other (2014)


b)Trainingprogressbymodule

Graph6:Trainingprogressbymodulein2014(nationaltraining+train‑the‑trainers’sessions)

Graph7:Trainingprogressbymodulefrom2010to2014(nationaltraining+train‑the‑trainers’sessions)

822

502 494

311

195 122 115

75 70 64 27 17 5 0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w

Tech

niqu

es

Evid

ence

As

sess

men

t

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Per

sons

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

In

form

ation

Excl

usio

n

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n As

ylum

Sys

tem

End

of P

rote

ction

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

D

irecti

ve

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Number of participants by module in EU+ States and Other (2014)

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

2130

1266

980 875

457 437 405 313

224 121 74 22 17

878

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

2200

Incl

usio

n

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

an

d H

uman

Rig

hts

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Excl

usio

n

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n As

ylum

Sy

stem

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Number of participants by module in EU+States and other (2010-2014)


Graph8:TrendsinparticipationintheEASOTrainingCurriculumbetween2010and2014

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

850

900

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Number of participants by module in National Trainingsand Train-the-Trainers' sessions in EU+ and other (2010-2014)

Inclusion

Evidence Assessment

Country of Origin Information

Interviewing Vulnerable Persons

Interview Techniques

Interviewing Children

Drafting and Decision Making

International Refugee Lawand Human Rights

End of Protection

Asylum Prvocedure Directive

Module for Managers

Dublin Regulation

Exclusion

Common European Asylum System


Table1:EvolutioninthenumberofparticipantsintheEASOTrainingCurriculumbetween2013and2014

ModuleParticipants Sessions

2014 2013 Evolution 2014 2013Inclusion 822 618 ì 33 % 55 45Interview Techniques 502 254 ì 98 % 33 17Evidence Assessment 494 264 ì 87 % 35 18Interviewing Vulnerable Persons 311 271 ì 15 % 24 21Interviewing Children 195 41 ì 376 % 16 4Country of Origin Information 122 241 î -49 % 8 16Exclusion 115 57 ì 102 % 9 4Dublin Regulation 75 88 î -15 % 7 5Drafting and Decision Making 70 65 ì 8 % 6 4Common European Asylum System 64 10 ì 540 % 6 1End of Protection 27 19 ì 42 % 3 3Module for Managers 17 0 ì / 1 0Asylum Procedures Directive 5 0 ì / 1 0International Refugee Law and Human Rights 0 230 î -100 % 0 17Total 2819 2158 ì 31 % 204 155

Graph9:Evolutioninthetop5modules2014vs2013

822

502 494

311

195

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

wTe

chni

ques

Evid

ence

Asse

ssm

ent

Inte

rvie

win

gVu

lner

able

Per

sons

Inte

rvie

win

gCh

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

wTe

chni

ques

Evid

ence

Asse

ssm

ent

Inte

rvie

win

gVu

lner

able

Per

sons

Inte

rvie

win

gCh

ildre

n

Top 5 modules in National Trainingsin EU+ and others (2014)

618

271 264 254 241

National Trainings in EU+and others (2013)


Summary

• The Inclusion module was the most popular module in 2014 with 29 % of the total number of partici-pants in EASO Training Curriculum. The number of participants who completed the Inclusion module increased by 25 % compared to the previous year.

• The Interview Techniques was the second most popular module with 18 % of the total number of par-ticipants. The number of participants in this particular module increased by 98 % compared to 2013. Furthermore, the 502 participants in the Interview Techniques module in 2014 represent 57 % of all participants trained in this module since 2010.

• The third most attended module in 2014 and 2013 was the Evidence Assessment, with an increase of 87 % in the number of participants trained in 2014 compared to 2013.

• The number of participants in the Inclusion, Interview Techniques and Evidence Assessment modules respectively confirms that the learning path for asylum case officers, adopted by EASO at the end of 2013, has been successfully implemented by Member States.

• Two additional modules among the top 5 in 2014 were advanced versions of the Interview Techniques module, dealing with interview techniques of specific categories of applicants, namely vulnerable persons and children.

• The strongest progression was made in the Common European Asylum System module (+540 %) and the Interviewing Children module (+376 %).

• The Module for Managers has been developed in 2013-2014 and was used for the first time in 2014.

• Due to the EASO plan to develop a new module on fundamental rights and international protection in the EU, Member States did not make use of the International Refugee Law and Human Rights module in 2014.


c) LanguageversionsbymoduleavailableontheEASOTrainingPlatform(update on 15/04/2015)

Mod

ule

Lang

uage

s on

line

Upd

ated

ver

sion

Out

date

d ve

rsio

n

Incl

usio

n14

EN v. 4

FR v. 4

EL v. 4

DE v. 4

HU v. 4

BG v. 4

SK

v. 4

PL v.4

SL v. 4

HR v. 4

IT v. 4

RO v. 2

RU v. 2

TR v. 3

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

9EN v.

3.5

FR v. 3.

5HU v.

3.5

PL v. 3.

5EL v.

3BG v.

3BG v.

3FI v.

3RU v

3

Draft

ing

and

Deci

sion

Mak

ing

8EN v.

3.1

DE v 3.

1LT v.

3.1

HU v. 3.

1RU v.

3.1

EL

v.1.1

CZ v. 1.

1RO v.

1.1

Inte

rvie

w Te

chni

ques

8EN v.

3.1

FR v. 3.

1HU v.

3.1

RU v. 3.

1HU v.

3.1

DE v. 3.

1CZ V.

3.1

EL v. 1.

1

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Per

sons

5EN v.

3RO v.

3BG v.

3SK v.

3HU v.

3In

tern

ation

al R

efug

ee L

aw

and

Hum

an R

ight

s3

EN v. 2.

1CZ v.

1.5

EL v. 2.

1

Excl

usio

n2

EN v. 4

FR v. 1.

1

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on2

EN v. 3

CZ v. 1.

2

Dubl

in II

I Reg

ulati

on2

EN v.1DE v.

3

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

s Dire

ctive

2EN v.

4FR v.

1.1

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n1

EN

v.3 3

.1

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n As

ylum

Sys

tem

1EN

v.1

.1

End

of P

rote

ction

1EN v.

3

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

1EN v.

0.9

Lang

uage

s onl

ine

ENFR

ELDE

HUCZ

RURO

BGSK

PLIT

LTTR

SLHR

FITO

TAL

Num

bero

ftranslatedversionsonline

145

55

54

43

32

22

11

11

159


Graph10:DistributionofparticipantsbylanguageintheEASOTrainingCurriculumin2014

Summary

• The EASO training modules are available in a total of 17 language versions. Only four modules (Inter-viewing Children, Common European Asylum System, End of Protection and Module for Managers) have not been translated and are available in English only.

• In 2014, two thirds of the participants completed training sessions in the EASO Training Curriculum in English language followed by Russian (2) (6 %) and German (5.8 %).

(2) The Russian versions of the modules have been used within the Prague Process.

Bulgarian0.8%

Croatian0.5%

English67.3%

Finnish1.0%

French4.0%German

5.9%Greek1.4%Hungarian

5.4%

Italian4.4%

Polish0.4% Romanian

0.6%Russian

6.0%Slovak0.9%Turkish

1.4%


2. Profile of participants from EU+ States and other stakeholders in the EASO Training Curriculum (3)

Reading example: 86 % of participants registered in EASO Training Curriculum performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’.

Please note that one asylum officer may perform several tasks.

Summary

• The largest percentage of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum is responsible for preparing and undertaking asylum interviews (86 %). The second most common profile relates to drafting asylum deci-sions (75 %), while 59 % of the participants deal with analysis of facts and documentation following an asy-lum interview. This corresponds to the core tasks which are most commonly shared by case officers across the EU+ States confirming that the EASO Training Curriculum is reaching its primary target audience.

• The lowest percentage of participants represents persons who are responsible for drafting and supervis-ing the implementation of asylum procedural guidelines (3 %) and for producing country reports and/or eligibility guidelines, which confirms that middle managers and policy officers have not been benefiting enough from the Curriculum.

(3) Profile has been prepared on the basis of information available since June 2013, i.e. since the beginning of the collection of data regarding the task description of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum.

23%

86%

27%

59%

75%

30%

8%

31%

3% 2% 3% 0%

25%

50%

75%

100% Tasks performed by participants in EASO Training Curriculum

Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-

gath

erin

g in

terv

iew

s ; r

egis

trati

on; s

cree

ning

an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws

and

hear

ings

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

mis

sion

s)

Anal

ysis

of f

acts

and

doc

umen

tatio

n fo

llow

ing

an a

sylu

m in

terv

iew

Dra

ftin

g an

d pr

opos

al o

f as

ylum

dec

isio

ns

Supe

rvis

ion/

revi

ew o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

isio

ns

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

isio

ns a

t app

eal

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Dra

ftin

g an

d su

perv

isio

n of

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

asy

lum

pr

oced

ural

gui

delin

es

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts

and/

or

elig

ibili

ty g

uide

lines

Oth

ers


3. Progress in the EASO Training Curriculum in EU+ States and other stakeholders: Analysis by module

a) Inclusion module

87

372 231

618

822

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0

200

400

600

800

1000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

Number of participants and number of train-the-trainers' and national sessions (2010-2014)


0

50

100

150

200

250

300Number of participants by Member State (2014)

251

166

11091

5436 30 23 17 11 11 7 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

SE NL

DE

OTH

ER HU BE EL FR HR PL FI IT BG AT LV CZ SI CH NO SK MT EE PT

578

318

252223

171 166

11396

5629 23 20 20 17 16 7 6 6 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 10

100

200

300

400

500

600

SE BE NL

OTHE

R EL FR DE FI HU PL RO LU AT HR CY IT LV MT

BG SK CZ EE PT UK

CH NO SI

Number of participants by Member States (2010-2014)

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

2320

16

29

2017

7 6 63 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1

0

10

20

30

40

PL RO LU AT HR CY IT LV MT BG SK CZ EE PT UK CH NO SI


ProfileofparticipantsintheInclusionmodule

Reading example: 94 % of participants registered in the Inclusion module performed the following task: ‘Prepa-ration and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as stated in the registration forms.


Summary

• The Inclusion module has been the most popular EASO training module since 2011. The latest update of the module took place in 2013. The next update is foreseen in 2016.

• Significant progress in the implementation of the Inclusion module has been observed since its update in 2013. In 2013 the module was followed by 618 asylum officials, while in 2014 the overall number of participants increased to 822 (+33 %).

• The vast majority of participants in the Inclusion module are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection (93 %). 70 % of participants draft asylum decisions.

• In 2014 over 50 training sessions (national training + train-the-trainers’ sessions) were organised in the module, compared to over 40 sessions in 2013.

• Since 2010, participants from 25 Member States, Norway and Switzerland have been trained in the Inclusion module. In additional the module has been used in third countries and/or by other stakeholders.

• In 2014 the Inclusion module was used by 21 Member States,Norway, Switzerland, UNHCR, Serbia, Macedonia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ukraine and Turkey.

• The Inclusion module is available in 13 languages.

• In 2013 the Handbook on the Inclusion module was developed. The handbook is available in 19 lan-guage versions.

0%

25%

50%

75%

100% Tasks performed by participants

Unde

rtak

ing

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws ;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(inclu

ding

par

ticip

ation

in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asyl

um d

ecisi

ons

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fra

ud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m

proc

edur

al g

uide

lines

Prod

uctio

n of

coun

try

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Othe

rs

29%

94%

14%

48%

70%

34%

6%

38%

1% 1% 2%


b) InterviewTechniquesmodule

3142 46

254

502

0

10

5

20

25

30

35

0

100

200

300

400

600

500

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

Number of participants and number of train-the-trainers'and national sessions (2010-2014)


15

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

1 13 2 1 11913

1 1 1 1

188

137 135

8270 69

54

3733

158 4 3 2 1

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

OTH

ER EL SE IT FI NL

HU BE FR BG PL LU DE LV MT EE CH LT IE PT SI CZ ES RO DK AT UK

HR

1 12 2

1

9

1

13

3

1 1 1 1

15

8

4

32

10

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

BG PL LU DE LV MT EE IE CH LT CZ SI ES PT HR RO DK UK AT


Number of participants by Member State (2014)145

82 78 66

52

33

15 12 8 3 2 2 2 1 1 0

50

100

150

OTHER IT SE NL HU BE BG EL FI FR DE LV LT CZ EE


ProfileofparticipantsintheInterviewTechniquesmodule

Reading example: 92 % of participants registered in Interview Techniques module performed the task ‘Prepara-tion and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as stated in the registration forms.


Summary

• The Interview Techniques was the second most popular module in 2014 with a rise of 98 % in the number of participants when compared to 2013. The 502 participants in the Interview Techniques training in 2014 represent 57 % of all participants trained in this module since 2010.

• This significant increase in the number of participants in the Interview Techniques module is a result of its latest update, which took place in 2013.

• The vast majority of participants in the Interview Techniques module are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection (92 %). 77 % of participants draft asylum decisions, while 65 % are responsible for analysing facts and documentation following an asylum interview.

• A significant increase was also observed in the number of national and train-the-trainers’ sessions organised in the Interview Techniques module. In 2014, 33 sessions were held compared to 17 in 2013.

• Since 2010, 26 Member States, Switzerland and other stakeholders organised training sessions within the Interview Techniques module.

• In 2014 the Interview Techniques module was used by 14 Member States as well as other stakeholders.

• The Interview Techniques module is available in eight language versions.

• In 2014 the Handbook on the Interview Techniques module was developed. The handbook is available in 17 language versions.

0%

25%

50%

75%


Unde

rtak

ing

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws ;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(inclu

ding

par

ticip

ation

in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asyl

um d

ecisi

ons

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fra

ud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m

proc

edur

al g

uide

lines

Prod

uctio

n of

coun

try

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

19%

92%

31%

65%

77%

26%

15%

28%

2% 2% 1%


c) EvidenceAssessmentmodule

137

222149

264

494

0

10

20

30

40

0

100

200

300

400

600

500

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants




68 65 60

31 29 22 11 2 2 2 1 1

0

50

100

150

200

SE NL BE DE OTHER FI CY EL BG IT HR LU NO

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


405

186

123114

108

75 7343 41

29 22 224 4 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

SE BE NL FI EL

OH

TER DE PL HU CH FR CY MT LV BG NO IT EE HR LT SI AT LU UK

DK

RO

43 41

29

22 22

4 42 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0

10

20

30

40

50

PL HU CH FR CY MT LV BG NO IT EE HR LT SI AT LU UK DK RO


ProfileofparticipantsintheEvidenceAssessmentmodule

Reading example: 92 % of participants registered in Evidence Assessment module performed the task ‘Prepara-tion and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as stated in the registration forms.


Summary

• The Evidence Assessment module was the second most popular EASO training module between 2010 and 2014. The module will be upgraded in 2015.

• Progress in implementation of the Evidence Assessment module has been observed since 2013. In 2013 the module was followed by 264 asylum officials, while in 2014 the overall number of partici-pants increased to 494 (+87 %).

• The vast majority of participants in the Evidence Assessment module are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection (92 %). 77 % of trainees prepare drafts of asylum decisions, while 66 % deal with analysis of facts and documentation following an asylum interview.

• In 2014, almost 30 training sessions (national training + train-the-trainers’ sessions) were organised in the module, compared to over 10 sessions in 2013.

• Since 2010, 23 Member States, Switzerland, Norway and other stakeholders organised training ses-sions in the Evidence Assessment module.

• In 2014 the Evidence Assessment module was used by 11 Member States, Norway and other stakeholders.

• The Evidence Assessment module is available in nine language versions.

• A Handbook on the Evidence Assessment module will be developed after the upgrade of the module, which is foreseen in 2015.

0%

25%

50%

75%


Unde

rtak

ing

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws ;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asyl

um d

ecisi

ons

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fra

ud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m

proc

edur

al g

uide

lines

Prod

uctio

n of

coun

try

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

12%

92%

34%

66%

77%

44%

10%

39%

4% 3% 1%


d) InterviewingVulnerablePersonsmodule

0

79

217271

311

0

10

15

5

20

25

30

0

100

50

200

150

300

250

350

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants




47 43

31 25 23

18 15 11 9 9

2 1 1 1 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

NL HU SE SI SK BG RO BE LU FI FR OTHER DE MT HR

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


405

133

57 5033 32 27 25 23 20 19 18 12 5 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

NL SE BE HU EL SI SK BG FR RO FI AT LU PL

OTH

ER DE EE CH MT

DK LV HR

UK IE LT

33 32

2725

2320 19 18

12

54 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

EL SI SK BG FR RO FI AT LU PLO

THER D

E EE CH MT

DK LV HR

UK IE LT


ProfileofparticipantsintheInterviewingVulnerablePersonsmodule

Reading example: 84 % of participants registered in Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as stated in the registration forms.


Summary

• A steady increase in participation in the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module has been observed since 2011. In 2013 the module was followed by 271 asylum officials, while in 2014 the overall number of participants increased to 311 (+14 %).

• The latest update of the module took place in 2013.

• The majority of participants in the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module (84 %) are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection.

• In 2014, over 25 training sessions (national training + train-the-trainers’ sessions) were organised in the module, compared to over 20 sessions in 2013.

• Since 2010, 23 Member States, Switzerland and other stakeholders organised training sessions in the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module.

• In 2014 the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module was used by 14 Member States and other stakeholders.

• The Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module is available in five language versions.

• In 2014 the Handbook on the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module was developed and will be available in 2015.

0%

25%

50%

75%


Unde

rtak

ing

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws ;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asyl

um d

ecisi

ons

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fra

ud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m

proc

edur

al g

uide

lines

Prod

uctio

n of

coun

try

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

33%

84%

22%

52%

80%

19%

3%

29%

3% 0%

15%


e) InterviewingChildrenmodule

9171 59 41

195

0

10

15

5

20

0

100

50

150

200

250

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants



Number of participants by Member State (2014)

72

46 44

19

5 4 2 1 1 1 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

SE BE EL NL MT SK IT CY DE OTHER

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Number of participants by Member States (2010-2014)167

86

77

45

30

148 5 4 4 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

SE BE NL EL AT N

O

MT

DE SK DK

OTH

ER UK IT PL CY ES LT FI LU IE EE FR

14

5

54 4 4

2 21 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

NO

MT

DE SK DK

OTH

ER UK IT PL CY ES LT FI LU IE EE FR


ProfileofparticipantsintheInterviewingChildrenmodule

Reading example: 91 % of participants registered in Interviewing Children module performed the task ‘Prepara-tion and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as stated in the registration forms.

Please note that one asylum officer may perform several tasks

Summary

• A significant progress in the implementation of the Interviewing Children module was observed in 2014. While in 2013 the module was followed by 41 asylum officials, in 2014 the overall number of participants increased to 195 (+375 %).

• The increase in the number of participants in 2014 is directly linked with the latest update of the mod-ule, which took place in the same year.

• The vast majority of participants in the Interviewing Children module (91 %) are responsible for inter-viewing applicants for international protection. 77 % of the participants draft asylum decisions (77 %), while 64 % analyse facts and documents following an asylum interview.

• In 2014, almost 15 training sessions (national training + train-the-trainers’ sessions) were organised in the module, compared to less than five sessions in 2013.

• Since 2010, 20 Member States, Norway and other stakeholders organised training sessions in the Interviewing Children Module.

• In 2014, the Interviewing Children module was used by nine Member States and other stakeholders.

• The Interviewing Children module is available in English only.

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-

gath

erin

g in

terv

iew

s ; r

egis

trati

on; s

cree

ning

an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws

and

hear

ings

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

mis

sion

s)

Anal

ysis

of f

acts

and

doc

umen

tatio

n fo

llow

ing

an a

sylu

m in

terv

iew

Dra

ftin

g an

d pr

opos

al o

f as

ylum

dec

isio

ns

Supe

rvis

ion/

revi

ew o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

isio

ns

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

isio

ns a

t app

eal

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Dra

ftin

g an

d su

perv

isio

n of

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

asy

lum

pr

oced

ural

gui

delin

es

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts

and/

or

elig

ibili

ty g

uide

lines

Oth

ers

22%

91%

27%

64%

77%

37%

0%

26%

2% 1% 3%


f) Exclusionmodule

0

18 21

57

115

0

6

8

4

2

10

0

100

50

75

25

125

150

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants




39

33

18 14

4 3 2 1 1 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

EL SE NL BE OTHER DK NO IS FI

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


53

41

35 35

24

8

3 32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

BE EL SE NL FR

OTH

ER NO DK

CH DE SK PL AT IS MT FI

8

3 3

21 1 1 1 1 1 1

0123456789

OTH

ER NO DK

CH DE

MT SK IS AT PL FI


ProfileofparticipantsintheExclusionmodule

Reading example: 80 % of participants registered in Exclusion module performed the task ‘Preparation and under-taking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as stated in the registration form.


Summary

• An increase in participation in the Exclusion module has been observed since 2011, with a significant rise in the number of participants in 2014. While in 2013 the module was followed by 57 asylum officials, in 2014 the overall number of participants increased to 115 (+101 %).

• The latest update of the module took place in 2014.

• The majority of participants in the Exclusion module are responsible for drafting asylum decisions (89 %) and interviewing applicants for international protection (80 %). 61 % of participants are also responsible for analysing facts and documentation after an asylum interview.

• In 2014 nine training sessions (national training + train-the-trainers’ sessions) were organised in the module compared to four sessions in 2013.

• Since 2010, 12 Member States, Norway, Switzerland, Island and other stakeholders organised training sessions in the Exclusion module.

• In 2014, the Exclusion module was used by seven Member States, Norway and other stakeholders.

• The Exclusion module is available in two language versions (English and French).

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-

gath

erin

g in

terv

iew

s ; r

egis

trati

on; s

cree

ning

an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws

and

hear

ings

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

mis

sion

s)

Anal

ysis

of f

acts

and

doc

umen

tatio

n fo

llow

ing

an a

sylu

m in

terv

iew

Dra

ftin

g an

d pr

opos

al o

f as

ylum

dec

isio

ns

Supe

rvis

ion/

revi

ew o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

isio

ns

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

isio

ns a

t app

eal

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Dra

ftin

g an

d su

perv

isio

n of

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

asy

lum

pr

oced

ural

gui

delin

es

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts

and/

or

elig

ibili

ty g

uide

lines

Oth

ers

20%

80%

42%

61%

89%

34%

3%

18%

4% 2% 3%


g) CountryofOriginInformationmodule

171

241

205

241

122

0

15

10

5

10

0

200

100

150

50

250

300

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants




41

18

12 12 11 7

4 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

OTHER RO HR FI IE SE PL DE NL IT DK BG LT LV MT HU

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


445

103 102

61 5045

29 25 19 16 15 13 10 8 6 6 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 10

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

OTH

ER EL IE RO CZ BE SE FI SK FR LU HR

CH PL MT

DE LV IT BG NL

DK LT HU UK EE CY SI

29

26

1916 15 13

10 86 6 6 5

3 3 2 2 21 1 1 1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

SE FI SK FR LU HR CH PL MT DE LV IT BG NL DK LT HU UK EE CY SI


ProfileofparticipantsintheCountryofOriginInformationmodule

Reading example: 68 % of participants registered in Country of Origin Information module performed the task ‘COI research (including participation in fact-finding missions)’ as stated in the registration forms.


Summary

• The trend in the implementation of the Country of Origin Information module has varied over time. In 2013 the module was followed by 241 asylum officials, while in 2014 the overall number of par-ticipants decreased to 122 (-49 %). It is noted that the Country of Origin Information module was updated throughout 2014, which might have influenced the decrease in the number of participants following the outdated version of the training. The first train-the-trainers’ session in the updated ver-sion of the module is foreseen in 2015.

• The majority of participants in the Country of Origin Information module are responsible for COI research (68 %), drafting asylum decisions (65 %), analysing facts and documentation following an asylum interview (58 %) and interviewing applicants for international protection (56 %).

• In 2014 over five training sessions (national training + train-the-trainers’ sessions) were organised in the module compared to over 15 sessions in 2013.

• Since 2010, 25 Member States, Switzerland and other stakeholders organised training sessions in the Country of Origin Information module.

• In 2014, the Country of Origin Information module was used by 15 Member States and other stakeholders.

• The Country of Origin Information module is available in two language versions.

0%

25%

50%

75%


Unde

rtak

ing

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws ;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asyl

um d

ecisi

ons

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fra

ud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m

proc

edur

al g

uide

lines

Prod

uctio

n of

coun

try

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

68%

7%

56% 58% 65%

6%

17% 12%

2% 10%

2%


h) DublinIIIRegulationmodule

33

6156

88

75

0

6

8

4

2

10

0

40

60

20

80

100

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

Number of participants and number of train-the-trainersand national sessions (2010-2014)



42

8 7 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

SE CH EL DE LV NO HR UK CY LT PL LU FI HU IE

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


74

59

20

107 7 7

4 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 10

20

40

60

80

100

SE DE

CH NL PL RO CZ EL IE LV N

O

MT LT UK

DK CY EE HU HR AT FI ES LU

OTH

ER10

7 7 7

43 3 3 3 3

2 2 2 2 21 1 1 1 1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

PL RO CZ EL IE LV NO MT LT UK DK CY EE HU HR AT FI ES LU OT


ProfileofparticipantsintheDublinIIIRegulationmodule

Reading example: 63 % of participants registered in Dublin III Regulationmodule performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as stated in the registration forms.


Summary

• The implementation of the Dublin III Regulation module has varied over time. In 2013 the module was followed by 88 asylum officials, while in 2014 the overall number of participants decreased to 75 (-14 %). This decrease was mainly caused by the adoption of the Dublin III Regulation (4) and the nec-essary update of the module which followed. The update was launched in 2013 and finalised in 2014.

• The vast majority of participants in the Dublin III Regulation module are responsible for drafting asy-lum decisions (85 %), analysing facts and documentation following an asylum interview (83 %) and interviewing applicants for international protection (63 %).

• In 2014 only seven training sessions (national training + train-the-trainers’ sessions) were organised in the module compared to nine sessions in 2013.

• Since 2010, 21 Member States, Switzerland, Norway and other stakeholders organised training ses-sions in the Dublin III Regulation module.

• In 2014 the Dublin III Regulation module was used by 15 Member States.

• The Dublin III Regulation module is available in two language versions.

(4) Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third country national or a stateless person (recast).

0%

25%

50%

75%


2%

63%

3%

83% 84%

21%

5%

23%

3%0% 2%

Unde

rtaki

ng o

f firs

t fac

t-gat

herin

g in

terv

iew

s (w

ithou

t goi

ng in

to t

he e

ssen

ce o

f the

asy

lum

clai

m);

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral o

f inc

omin

g ca

ses

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f a

sylu

m in

terv

iew

s and

hea

rings

COI r

esea

rch

(inclu

ding

par

ticip

ation

in fa

ct fi

ndin

g m

issio

ns)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of a

sylu

m d

ecisi

ons

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er ca

sew

orke

rs' a

sylu

m d

ecisi

ons

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or o

ther

case

wor

kers

' d

ecisi

ons a

t app

eal

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fra

ud (c

ance

llatio

n pr

oced

ures

)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

asy

lum

pro

cedu

ral

gui

delin

es

Prod

uctio

n of

coun

try r

epor

ts a

nd/o

r elig

ibili

ty g

uide

lines

Othe

rs


i) DraftingandDecisionMakingmodule

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants



16

129

157

65 70

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

0

6

4

2

10

14

12

8

2

68

0

25

50

75

HU OTHER

Number of participants by Member States in 2014

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


93

85

34

26 2621

17

6 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

OTH

ER SE FI CZ EL RO PL SK LU BE NL IT DE LV AT CH MT EE HU FR IE DK

NO CY HR

6

4 4 4

3 3 3

2 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

LU BE NL IT DE LV AT CH MT EE HU FR IE DK NO CY HR


ProfileofparticipantsintheDraftingandDecisionMakingmodule

Reading example: 79 % of participants registered in Drafting and Decision Making module performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported.


Summary

• The trend in the implementation of the Drafting and Decision Making module has varied over time. A decrease in participation was observed in 2013, while in 2014 the numbers increased slightly. In 2012 the module was followed by 157 asylum officials, while in 2013 and 2014 the overall number of participants amounted to 65 and 70 participants respectively.

• It is to be noted that the decrease in participation in the Drafting and Decision Making module might be related to the introduction of the learning path for asylum case officers in 2013, with the core modules being Inclusion, Interview Techniques and Evidence Assessment. EASO has also acknowledged the fact that in terms of content, the training module on Drafting and Decision Making has similar elements to the modules on Evidence Assessment as well as Inclusion. In 2014 EASO further discussed this matter with Member States and agreed upon a course of action where the availability of this module would eventually be suspended while elements of it would be integrated in other modules in the Training Curriculum (Inclusion and Evidence Assessment).

• The majority of participants in the Drafting and Decision Making module are responsible for analysing facts and documentation following an asylum interview (81 %), interviewing applicants for interna-tional protection (79 %) and drafting asylum decisions (73 %).

• In 2014 only five training sessions (national training + train-the-trainers’ sessions) were organised in the module compared to four sessions held in 2013 and 11 sessions in 2012.

• Since 2010, 22 Member States, Switzerland, Norway and other stakeholders organised training ses-sions in the Drafting and Decision Making module.

• In 2014 the Drafting and Decision Making module was used by only one Member State and other stakeholders.

• The Drafting and Decision Making module is available in eight language versions.

0%

25%

50%

75%


Unde

rtak

ing

of fi

rst

fact

-gat

herin

g in

terv

iew

s; re

gist

ratio

n; sc

reen

ing

and/

or re

ferr

al o

f inc

omin

g ca

ses

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

fas

ylum

inte

rvie

ws

and

hea

rings

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g p

artic

ipati

on in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

pro

posa

l of

asyl

um d

ecisi

ons

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er ca

sew

orke

rs'

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

def

ense

of o

wn

orot

her c

asew

orke

rs'

dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fra

ud(c

ance

llatio

n p

roce

dure

s)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

impl

emen

tatio

n o

f asy

lum

pro

cedu

ral

gui

delin

es

Prod

uctio

n of

coun

try

repo

rts a

nd/o

rel

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

16%

79%

57%

81% 73%

22% 19%

2% 3% 0% 0%


j) CommonEuropeanAsylumSystemmodule

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants


Sessions Participants

9

24

12 10

64

0

20

30

50

70

10

40

60

0

2

3

5

7

1

4

6

24

19

8

5 4 4

0

5

10

15

20

25

SE EL NL SK OTHER DE

Number of participants by Member State in 2014

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


36

2422

10

6 64 4

1 1 1 1 1 1 10

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

SE SK EL NL

DE

OTH

ER PL MT CZ BG LV ES UK PT RO

6 6

4 4

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

DE

OTH

ER PL MT CZ BG LV ES UK PT RO


ProfileofparticipantsintheCommonEuropeanAsylumSystemmodule

Reading example: 14 % of participants registered in Common European Asylum System module performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported.


Summary

• The Common European Asylum System module was developed in 2012-2013 with the pilot train-the-trainers’ session held in December 2013. The module replaced the EU Asylum Law and Pol-icy. The update of the Common European Asylum System module is foreseen in 2016.

• Significant progress in the implementation of the Common European Asylum System module has been observed since its development in 2013. During the pilot train-the-trainers’ session in 2013 the module was followed by 10 asylum officials, while in 2014 the overall number of participants increased to 64 (+540 %).

• The majority of participants in the Common European Asylum System module are responsible for drafting asylum decisions (58 %), analysing facts and documentation following an asylum interview (47 %) and undertaking first fact-gathering interviews (42 %).

• In 2014 six training sessions (national training + train-the-trainers’ sessions) were organised in the module compared to one session in 2013.

• Since 2010, training sessions in the EU Asylum Law and Policy module and then the Common Euro-pean Asylum System module were organised by 14 Member States and other stakeholders.

• In 2014 the Common European Asylum System module was used by five Member States and other stakeholders.

• The Common European Asylum System module is available in English only.

• In 2013 the Handbook on the Common European Asylum System module was developed. The hand-book is available in 19 language versions.

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tasks performed by participants

Unde

rtak

ing

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws ;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asyl

um d

ecisi

ons

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fra

ud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m

proc

edur

al g

uide

lines

Prod

uctio

n of

coun

try

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

42%

14%

3%

47%

58%

3% 2%

17%

5% 2% 3%


k) EndofProtectionmoduleN

umbe

r of p

artic

ipan

ts


0

7

21 19 27

0

1

2

3

4

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Number of sessions and participants on End of Protection module (2010-2014)

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

14

8

5

0

5

10

15

NL SI FI

Number of participants by Member State in 2014

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


32

11

9

6

2 2 2 21 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

NL

FR SI FI AT SE MT IT SK DK PL EE

OTH

ER EL CY NO

2 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0

1

2

3

AT SE MT IT SK DK PL EE

OTH

ER EL CY NO


ProfileofparticipantsintheEndofProtectionmodule

Reading example: 97 % of participants registered in End of Protection module performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported.


Summary

• The trend in the implementation of the End of Protection module has varied over time, with an increase of 42 % in 2014. In 2013 the module was followed by 19 asylum officials, while in 2014 the overall number of participants increased to 27.

• The update of the End of Protection module is foreseen in 2015.

• The vast majority of participants in the End of Protection module are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection (97 %) and drafting asylum decisions (91 %). At the same time only 28 % of trainees who completed the training investigate refugee fraud/work on cessation.

• Throughout 2012, 2013 and 2014 three training sessions (national training + train-the-trainers’ ses-sions) were organised in the module every year.

• Since 2010 training sessions in the End of Protection module were organised by 14 Member States, Norway and other stakeholders.

• In 2014 the End of Protection module was used by three Member States.

• The End of Protection module is only available in English.

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-

gath

erin

g in

terv

iew

s ; r

egis

trati

on; s

cree

ning

an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws

and

hear

ings

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

mis

sion

s)

Anal

ysis

of f

acts

and

doc

umen

tatio

n fo

llow

ing

an a

sylu

m in

terv

iew

Dra

ftin

g an

d pr

opos

al o

f as

ylum

dec

isio

ns

Supe

rvis

ion/

revi

ew o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

isio

ns

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

isio

ns a

t app

eal

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Dra

ftin

g an

d su

perv

isio

n of

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

asy

lum

pr

oced

ural

gui

delin

es

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts

and/

or

elig

ibili

ty g

uide

lines

Oth

ers

44%

97%

3%

53%

91%

3%

25% 28%

0% 0% 3%


l) ModuleforManagersN

umbe

r of p

artic

ipan

ts

Participants Sessions 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Number of participants and number of train-the-trainer sessions (2010-2014)

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

17

0

1

0

5

10

15

20

Nodataprior2014available


8

2 2 2

1 1 1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

EL BG BE DE OTHER LT FI


ProfileofparticipantsintheModuleforManagers

Reading example: 50 % of participants registered in Module for Managers performed the task ‘Supervision/review of other caseworkers’ decisions at appeal’ as stated in the registration forms.


Summary

• The Module for Managers had been developed throughout 2013 and 2014 with the pilot train-the-train-ers’ session organised in the second semester of 2014. The session was attended by 17 participants from six Member States.

• The participants in the Module for Managers supervise/review other caseworkers’ decisions or pro-duce country reports and/or eligibility guidelines.

• The Module for Managers is available in English only.

• The development of the Handbook on the Module for Managers shall be launched in 2015.

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-

gath

erin

g in

terv

iew

s ; r

egis

trati

on; s

cree

ning

an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws

and

hear

ings

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

mis

sion

s)

Anal

ysis

of f

acts

and

doc

umen

tatio

n fo

llow

ing

an a

sylu

m in

terv

iew

Dra

ftin

g an

d pr

opos

al o

f as

ylum

dec

isio

ns

Supe

rvis

ion/

revi

ew o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

isio

ns

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

isio

ns a

t app

eal

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Dra

ftin

g an

d su

perv

isio

n of

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

asy

lum

pr

oced

ural

gui

delin

es

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts

and/

or

elig

ibili

ty g

uide

lines

Oth

ers

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

50%

0% 0%

17%

50%

17%


m) AsylumProceduresDirectivemoduleN

umbe

r of p

artic

ipan

ts


2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

11

0

6

0

5

0

1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12


1

4

0

1

2

3

4

5

DE OTHER

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Number of participants by Member States on APD module (2010-2014)9

2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1

0

2

4

6

8

10

OTHER PL SK DE SE ES UK LU MT


ProfileofparticipantsintheAsylumProceduresDirectivemodule

Reading example: 100 % of participants registered in Asylum Procedures Directive module performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported.


Summary

• The trend in the implementation of the Asylum Procedures Directive module has varied over time, with no participants in 2013 and 5 participants in 2014. Limited use of the module in 2013 and 2014 was mainly due to the adoption of the recast Asylum Procedures Directive (5) and the necessary update of the module which followed. The update was finalised in 2014 with the pilot train-the-train-ers’ session held in November 2014.

• All participants in the Asylum Procedures Directive module are responsible for preparing and under-taking interviews with applicants for international protection. Additionally, some of them analyse facts and documentation following an asylum interview (67 %) or supervise/review other casework-ers’ asylum decisions (67 %).

• Since 2010, training sessions in the Asylum Procedures Directive module were organised by eight Member States and other stakeholders.

• In 2014, the Asylum Procedures Directive module was used by one Member State and other stakeholders.

• The Asylum Procedures Directive module is available in English only.

(5) Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast)

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-

gath

erin

g in

terv

iew

s ; r

egis

trati

on; s

cree

ning

an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws

and

hear

ings

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

mis

sion

s)

Anal

ysis

of f

acts

and

doc

umen

tatio

n fo

llow

ing

an a

sylu

m in

terv

iew

Dra

ftin

g an

d pr

opos

al o

f as

ylum

dec

isio

ns

Supe

rvis

ion/

revi

ew o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

isio

ns

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

isio

ns a

t app

eal

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Dra

ftin

g an

d su

perv

isio

n of

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

asy

lum

pr

oced

ural

gui

delin

es

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts

and/

or

elig

ibili

ty g

uide

lines

Oth

ers

33%

100%

33%

67%

33%

67%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%


n) InternationalRefugeeLawandHumanRightsN

umbe

r of p

artic

ipan

ts


2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Number of participants and number of train-the-trainer and national sessions (2010-2014)

Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

55 66 54

230

0 0

5

10

15

20

0

50

100

150

200

250

No session organised in 2014

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


295

66

197 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

SE CZ PL FR

OTH

ER NL EL AT RO LV MT

DK

UK DE

7

3

2 2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

FR

OTH

ER NL EL AT RO LV MT

DK

UK DE


ProfileofparticipantsintheInternationalRefugeeLawandHumanRightsmodule

Reading example: 100 % of participants registered in International Refugee Law and Human Rights module per-formed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported.


Summary

• The trend in the implementation of the International Refugee Law and Human Rights module has been changing over time. In 2012 the module was followed by 54 participants, while in 2013 the number of participants increased to 230. In 2014, following the EASO plan to develop a new module on fundamental rights and international protection in the EU, Member States did not make use of the International Refugee Law and Human Rights module.

• A new module on Fundamental Rights and International Protection in the EU, replacing the Interna-tional Refugee Law and Human Rights module, will be developed in 2015.

• All participants in the International Refugee Law and Human Rights module are responsible for pre-paring and undertaking interviews with applicants for international protection as well as COI research. Additionally they analyse facts and documentation following an asylum interview (83 %), draft asylum decisions (83 %) and supervise/review other caseworkers’ asylum decisions (78 %).

• Since 2010, training sessions in the International Refugee Law and Human Rights were organised by 13 Member States and other stakeholders.

• The International Refugee Law and Human Rights module is available in three language versions.

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-

gath

erin

g in

terv

iew

s ; r

egis

trati

on; s

cree

ning

an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws

and

hear

ings

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

mis

sion

s)

Anal

ysis

of f

acts

and

doc

umen

tatio

n fo

llow

ing

an a

sylu

m in

terv

iew

Dra

ftin

g an

d pr

opos

al o

f as

ylum

dec

isio

ns

Supe

rvis

ion/

revi

ew o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

isio

ns

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

isio

ns a

t app

eal

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Dra

ftin

g an

d su

perv

isio

n of

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

asy

lum

pr

oced

ural

gui

delin

es

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts

and/

or

elig

ibili

ty g

uide

lines

Oth

ers

17%

100% 100%

83% 83% 78%

0%

72%

0% 0% 0%


4. EU+ States EASO training factsheets, 2014

4.1. Austria

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Austria2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Austria is presented according to the following data:

• number of participants and number of national training sessions organised in the EASO Training Curriculum,

• number of participants and number of national training sessions organised by module,

• number of participants in train-the-trainers’ sessions,

• number of participants in train-the-trainers’ sessions by module,

• comparison between participation in train-the-trainers’ sessions and delivery of national training sessions (i.e. multiplier effect).

Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminAustriafrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinAustriabymodule(2014)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum was organised in Austria in 2014.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 N

umbe

r of s

essi

ons

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

Number of participants and number of national training sessions (2010-2014)


2933

0 0 00

1

2

3

0

20

40


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinAustriabymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromAustriaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

Graph5:ParticipantsfromAustriaintrain‑the‑trainer’ssessions(2010‑2014)

Participants in national trainings by module (2010-2014)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

29

1815

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Participants in train-the-trainers' sessions by module (2014)2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

20

7

4 4

0

2

0

2

4

6

8

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Participants in train-the-trainers' sessions (2010-2014)


Graph6:ParticipantsfromAustriaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

0

1

2

3

6

5

4

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Participation in train-the-trainers's sessions by module (2010-2014)

Incl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Excl

usio

n

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

5

3

2 2

1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingsessionsdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinAustria(2010‑2014)

Note: data provided in the registration forms

Total of participations

in train-the-trainers' sessions

Total of national training

delivered in Austria

Total of participants in

national training in Austria

5 participations in T-t-T's sessions

1 national training delivered

15 trainees in national training

1 participation in T-t-T's sessions

2 national trainings delivered

29 trainees in national trainings

No participation in T-t-T's sessions




No national training delivered

yet



yet



yet



yet



yet



yet



yet



yet



yet



yet



yet

Module

Inclusion


Interviewing Vulnerable

Persons


International Refugee Law and Human

Rights

End of Protection

Exclusion


Dublin Regulation

Evidence Assessment

Country of Origin

Information

Common European

Asylum System

Asylum Procedure Directive

Module for Managers


Section II, ProfileoftheAustrianparticipantsintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

No data on tasks performed by the participants from Austria in the EASO Training Curriculum has been collected during the sample period.

Section III, EASO Training and Expert Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbyAustria

Modules ContentExperts TrainersCountry of Origin Information 2 2Drafting and Decision Making -- 2End of Protection -- 2Evidence Assessment -- 1Exclusion -- 1Interviewing Children 2 3Inclusion -- 4International Refugee Law and Human Rights -- 2Interview Techniques 2 4Interviewing Vulnerable Persons 1 1Reception 2 --Didactic -- --Didactic trainers -- 3Total number of nominations 9 25

Summary

• No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Austria in 2014.

• The last training sessions in the EASO Training Curriculum in Austria were organised in 2011. The ses-sions in the Inclusion and Interviewing Vulnerable Persons modules were attended by 33 participants.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 47 % of Austrian participants in national sessions of the EASO Training Curric-ulum were trained in the Interviewing Children module, 29 % in the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module and 24 % in the Inclusion module.

• In 2014 two participants completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ session in the Inclusion module.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 17 participants from Austria attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Austria can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü Inclusion, with five participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers, and one national training session with 15 participants;

ü Interviewing Children, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer, and two national training sessions with 29 participants.

• Experts and trainers nominated by Austria cover 34 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.2. Belgium

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Belgium2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Belgium is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminBelgiumfrom2010to2014 (sessions+participants)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinBelgiumbymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

130

249

63

118

209

0

5

10

15

20

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Number of participants and number of national training sessions (2014)


Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

End

of P

rote

ction

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Incl

usio

n

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

0

1

5

4

3

2

0

10

20

30

40

70

60

50

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

65

46

36 33

15 14


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinBelgiumbymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromBelgiumintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

50

100

150

200

350

300

250

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Participants in national training sessions by module (2010-2014)In

clus

ion

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Excl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

End

of P

rote

ction

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

318

184

8455 51 43 33

0 0 0 0 0 0 0


0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromBelgiumintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromBelgiumintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


12

6

0 0

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0

1

2

3

5

4

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

win

gVu

lner

able

Per

sons

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Excl

usio

n

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

End

of P

rote

ction

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Incl

usio

n

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

4 4

2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingsessionsdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinBelgium(2010‑2014)

Note: data provided from EASO training registration lists

Module

Total of participations in Train-the-

Trainers' sessions


delivered in Belgium


national training in

Belgium





Evidence Assessment









Persons




Exclusion 2 participations in T-t-T's sessions



Country of Origin

Information




Inclusion No participation

in T-t-T's sessions






yet

Module for Managers



yet

Dublin Regulation



yet


Rights



yet

Common European

Asylum System



yet

End of Protection



yet




yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromBelgiumintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 92 % of participants registered in national training by Belgium performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 223 participants in national training in Belgium, including data regarding tasks performed- 19 national training sessions- Modules: Inclusion, Exclusion, Country of Origin Information, Interview Techniques, Interviewing Children,

Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, Evidence Assessment

Section III,EASOTrainingExpertsPool:contentexpertsandtrainersnominatedbyBelgium

Modules ContentExperts TrainersAsylum Procedures Directive 1Common European Asylum System 1 1Drafting and Decision Making 1Evidence Assessment 1 3Exclusion 1 1Interviewing Children 2 2Inclusion 1 3Interview Techniques 2 3Module for Managers 1 1Reception 4Didactic 1Didactic trainers 2Total number of nominations 15 17

0%

25%

50%

75%

100% Tasks performed by participants in national training as reported since July 2013

Unde

rtak

ing

of fi

rst f

act-

gath

erin

g in

terv

iew

s; re

gist

ratio

n; sc

reen

ing

and/

or re

ferr

al o

f in

com

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f asy

lum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g p

artic

ipati

on in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g a

n as

ylum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of a

sylu

m d

ecisi

ons

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f o

ther

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or o

ther

case

wor

kers

' d

ecisi

ons a

t app

eal

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fra

ud(c

ance

llatio

n pr

oced

ures

)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gui

delin

es

Prod

uctio

n of

coun

try

repo

rts

and

/or e

ligib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

0%

92%

4%

92% 92%

18%

3% 0% 0% 0% 0%


Summary

• A steady increase in the implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum has been observed in Belgium since 2012.

• In 2014, 17 national training sessions were organised in Belgium, representing a 70 % increase compared to 2013.

• Some 209 participants have been trained in national training sessions in Belgium in 2014, compared to 118 participants in 2013 (+77 % compared to 2013).

• The Evidence Assessment module ranked first in Belgium in 2014 (65 participants), followed by Inter-viewing Children (46 participants) and Inclusion (36 participants). Four training sessions in the Evidence Assessment module and four training sessions in the Inclusion module were delivered. Training in the Interviewing Children module was organised three times in 2014.

• Between 2010 and 2014, the highest number of participants (41 %) was trained in the Inclusion module, followed by 24 % of participants completing the Evidence Assessment module and 11 % completing the Interviewing Children module.

• The Interview Techniques module was delivered in the national training session for the first time in 2014.

• In 2014, two participants from Belgium completed a train-the-trainers’ session. Both participants com-pleted the pilot train-the-trainers’ session in the Module for Managers.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 20 participants from Belgium attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Belgium can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü Interviewing Techniques, with four participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and four national training sessions with 33 participants;

ü Evidence Assessment, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and 11 national training sessions with 184 participants;

ü Interviewing Children, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and six national training sessions with 84 participants;

ü Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and three national training sessions with 55 participants;

ü Exclusion, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and three national training sessions with 51 participants;

ü Country of Origin Information, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and five national training sessions with 43 participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that 92 % of trainees are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection, analysing facts and documentation following an asylum interview and drafting decisions on international protection.

• Experts and trainers nominated by Belgium cover 32 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.

Comments by Member State:In addition to the information provided above, it is noted that in 2009 four participants followed train-the-train-ers’ sessions in the Inclusion module and two participants completed train-the-trainers’ sessions in the Evi-dence Assessment module.


4.3. Bulgaria

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Bulgaria2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Bulgaria is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminBulgariafrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinBulgariabymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

0 0 0 0

38

0

1

2

3

4

0

10

20

30

40



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

End

of P

rote

ction

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Incl

usio

n

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent 0

1

3

2

23

15

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinBulgariabymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromBulgariaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsin2014

0

10

5

15

20

25 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


terv

iew

ing

Vuln

erab

lePe

rson

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

23

15

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

3

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromBulgariaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromBulgariaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

1

0

3

9

0

2

4

6

8

10

0

1

2

3

4 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

End

of P

rote

ction

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

3 3

2 2 2

1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingsessionsdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinBulgaria(2010‑2014)


Module


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Bulgaria



Bulgaria


Persons








Inclusion 3 participations in T-t-T's sessions


yet

Country of Origin

Information



yet

Module for Managers



yet

Evidence Assessment



yet

Common European

Asylum System



yet

End of Protection



yet

Dublin Regulation



yet




yet




yet

Exclusion No participation

in T-t-T's sessions


yet


Rights



yet




yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromBulgariaintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 100 % of participants registered in national training by Bulgaria performed the task ‘Prepara-tion and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as provided for in the registration forms.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 38 participants in national training in Bulgaria, including data regarding tasks performed- 3 national training sessions- Modules: Interview Techniques, Interviewing Vulnerable Persons

Section III: EASO Training and Experts Pool – content experts and trainersnominatedbyBulgaria

Bulgaria has not nominated any content experts or trainers to the EASO Training and Expert Pool.

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tasks performed by participants in national training as reported since July 2013U

nder

taki

ng o

f firs

t fac

t-gat

herin

g in

terv

iew

s; re

gist

ratio

n; sc

reen

ing

and/

or re

ferr

al o

f inc

omin

g ca

ses

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

0%

100%

0%

100% 100%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%


Summary

• The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum started in Bulgaria in 2014 with the organisation of three national training sessions and training of 38 participants.

• Out of three national training sessions organised in 2014, two sessions were held in the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module with 23 participants attending, which amounts to 61 % of the Bulgarian participants in national training sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum. One session was held in the Interview Techniques module with 15 participants trained (39 % of the Bulgarian participants in national training sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum).

• In 2014 nine participants from Bulgaria completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions (+200 % com-pared to 2013). The participants have been trained to become national trainers in the following mod-ules: Inclusion, Module for Managers, Country of Origin Information and Evidence Assessment.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 13 Bulgarian participants attended train-the-trainers’ sessions in the EASO training modules.

• The multiplier effect in Bulgaria can be observed on the basis of the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become national trainers and two national training sessions with 23 participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that all trainees from Bulgaria are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection, analysing facts and documentation following an asylum interview and/or drafting decisions on international protection.

• As of the end of 2014, Bulgaria did not nominate any content experts or trainers to the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.4. Croatia

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Croatia2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Croatia is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminCroatiafrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinCroatiabymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

0 0 0 0

27

0

1

2

3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

National training sessions by module (2014)


Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

End

of P

rote

ction

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Incl

usio

n

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

0

1

2 15

12

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinCroatiabymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromCroatiaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2014)

0

5

10

15 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Participants in national training sessions by module (2010-2014)15

12

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

dD

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

gVu

lner

able

Per

sons

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Participants in train-the-trainers' sessions by module (2014)2 2 2

1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromCroatiaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromCroatiaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0 0 0

3

7

0

2

4

6

8

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

2 2

2

1 1 1 1

0 0000000

1

2


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinCroatia(2010‑2014)


Module


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Croatia



Croatia

Inclusion 2 participations

in T-t-T's sessions



Country of Origin

Information 1 participation in T-t-T's sessions



Evidence Assessment



yet

Dublin Regulation



yet




yet


Persons 1 participation in T-t-T's sessions


yet




yet

InterviewingChildren



yet


in T-t-T's sessions


yet

End of Protection



yet

Common European

Asylum System



yet




yet

Module for Managers



yet


Rights



yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromCroatiaintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 96 % of participants registered in national training by Croatia performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 27 participants in national training sessions in Croatia- 2 national training sessions- Modules: Inclusion, Country of Origin Information

Section III: EASO Training and Experts Pool – content experts and trainersnominatedbyCroatia

Croatia has not nominated any content experts or trainers to the EASO Training and Expert Pool.

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

22%

96%

4%

74% 74%

0%

74% 74%

0% 0% 0%


Summary

• The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum started in Croatia in 2014 with the organisation of two national training sessions and training of 27 participants.

• The Inclusion module ranked first in Croatia in 2014 with 15 participants (56 % of the Croatian partici-pants in national sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum) followed by the Country of Origin Informa-tion module with 12 participants (44 % of the Croatian participants in national sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum).

• The Inclusion and Country of Origin Information modules have been used in national training for the first time in Croatia in 2014.

• In 2014 seven trainees from Croatia completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions. The participants have been trained to become national trainers in the following modules: Dublin III Regulation, Inclu-sion, Evidence Assessment, and Interviewing Vulnerable Persons.

• In 2013 three participants from Croatia were trained to become national trainers in the following modules: Interviewing Techniques, Drafting and Decision Making, Country of Origin Information.

• The multiplier effect in Croatia can be observed on the basis of two following modules:

ü Inclusion, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training session with 15 participants;

ü Country of Origin Information, with one participant trained in a train-the-trainers’ session to become national trainer and one national training session with 12 participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that 96 % of trainees from Croatia are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection. In addition, 74 % of the participants analyse facts and documentation following an asylum interview, draft decisions on international protection and/or defend asylum decisions at the appeal and investigate the refugee fraud (cancellation of procedure).

• As of the end of 2014 Croatia did not nominate any content experts or trainers to the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.5. Cyprus

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Cyprus2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Cyprus is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminCyprusfrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinCyprusbymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

0 0 0

15

21

0

1

2

0

5

10

15

20

25



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

End

of P

rote

ction

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Incl

usio

n

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

21

0

1

2

0

5

10

15

20

25


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinCyprusbymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromCyprusintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

5

10

25

20

15

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Participants in national training sessions by module (2010-2014)

21

15

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

gVu

lner

able

Per

sons

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Coun

try

ofO

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Dra

ftin

g an

dD

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

End

of P

rote

ction

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Excl

usio

n

Participants in train-the-trainers' sessions by module (2014)1 1 1

00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromCyprusintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromCyprusintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

1

2

3

4

0

3

2

0

3

0

1

2

3 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Incl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

2

1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingsessionsdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinCyprus(2010‑2014)


Module


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Cyprus



Cyprus

Evidence Assessment




Inclusion 1 participation in T-t-T's sessions



Dublin Regulation



yet




yet




yet

Country of Origin

Information



yet

End of Protection



yet




yet


Persons



yet


Rights



yet


in T-t-T's sessions


yet




yet

Common European

Asylum System



yet

Module for Managers



yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromCyprusintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 97 % of participants registered in national training by Cyprus performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 36 participants in national training in Cyprus- 2 national training sessions- Modules: Inclusion, Evidence Assessment

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%


nder

taki

ng o

f firs

t fac

t-gat

herin

g in

terv

iew

s; re

gist

ratio

n; sc

reen

ing

and/

or re

ferr

al o

f inc

omin

g ca

ses

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

6%

97% 100% 97% 97%

6% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0%


Section III:EASOTrainingExpertsPool:contentexpertsandtrainersnominatedbyCyprus

Modules ContentExperts TrainersAsylum Procedures Directive 1Country of Origin Information 1Drafting and Decision Making 1Dublin Regulation 1Evidence Assessment 1Exclusion 1Inclusion 1 1Interviewing Children 1International Refugee Law and Human Rights 1 Interview Techniques 2Interviewing Vulnerable Persons 1 Didactic 4 Total number of nominations 8 9

Summary

• An increase in implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Cyprus has been observed in 2014.

• In 2014, 21 participants were trained in one national training session, what amounts to 40 % increse in the number of participants compared to 2013 (15 participants).

• The Evidence Assessment module has been used in national training for the first time in Cyprus in 2014. It was the only module delivered in Cyprus in national training session throughout 2014.

• Between 2013 and 2014, 58 % of the participants in national sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum were trained in the Evidence Assessment module and 42 % in the Inclusion module.

• In 2014 three participants from Cyprus completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions. The participants were trained to become national trainers in the following modules: Dublin III Regulation, Interviewing Children, and Evidence Assessment.

• Between 2010 and 2014, eight participants from Cyprus attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Cyprus can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü Evidence Assessment, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and one national training session with 21 participants;

ü Inclusion, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and one national training session with 15 participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants from Cyprus in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that all trainees are responsible for COI research. In addition, 97 % of the participants deal with interviewing applicants for international protection, analysing facts and documentation following an asylum inter-view and/or drafting decisions on international protection.

• Experts and trainers nominated by Cyprus cover 17 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.6. CzechRepublic

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:CzechRepublic2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in the Czech Republic is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculumintheCzechRepublicfrom2010to2014(participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsintheCzechRepublicbymodule(2014)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum was organised in the Czech Republic in 2014.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

0

60

87

5

0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0

20

40

60

80

100


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsintheCzechRepublicbymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromtheCzechRepublicintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

10

20

70

60

50

40

30

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


tern

ation

al R

efug

eeLa

w a

nd H

uman

Rig

hts

Coun

try

ofO

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Dra

ftin

g an

dD

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Excl

usio

n

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

64

49

33

6

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Participants in train-the-trainers' sessions by module (2014)1 1

0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromtheCzechRepublicintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromtheCzechRepublicintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

2

4

6

4

1

2

0

2

0

1

2

3 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Incl

usio

n

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Excl

usio

n

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

2 2

1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingsessionsdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedintheCzechRepublic(2010‑2014)


Module Total of

participations in Train-the-

Trainers' sessions


delivered in Czech Republic



Czech Republic

International Refugee Law and Human Rights




Country of Origin

Information








Dublin Regulation





in T-t-T's sessions


yet




yet

CEAS (EU Asylum Law and Policy)



yet

Evidence Assessment



yet




yet


Persons



yet


in T-t-T's sessions


yet

End of Protection



yet




yet

Module for Managers



yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromtheCzechRepublicintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

No data on the profile of the Czech participants has been collected during the sample period.

Section III:EASOTrainingExpertsPool:contentexpertsandtrainersnominatedbytheCzechRepublic

Modules ContentExperts TrainersReception 2 ---Total number of nominations 2 ---

Summary

• A decrease in use of the EASO Training Curriculum in the Czech Republic has been observed since 2013. While in 2012 87 participants were trained in national training sessions in the EASO training modules, in 2013 the number of trainees decreased to five and in 2014 no national training session was organised.

• The last national training session organised in the Czech Republic in 2013 was delivered in the Country of Origin Information module.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 42 % of the Czech participants in national training sessions were trained in the International Refugee Law and Human Rights module, 32 % in the Country of Origin Information module and 22 % in the Drafting and Decision Making module.

• In 2014 two participants completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions. One participant was trained to become a national trainer in the Interview Techniques module, while the second participant was trained to become a national trainer in the Inclusion module.

• Between 2010 and 2014, nine participants from the Czech Republic attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in the Czech Republic can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü International Refugee Law and Human Rights, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and five national training sessions with 64 participants;

ü Country of Origin Information, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and five national training sessions with 49 participants;

ü Drafting and Decision Making, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and four national training sessions with 33 participants;

ü Dublin Regulation, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and one national training session with 6 participants.

• Experts nominated by the Czech Republic cover 2 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.

Comments by Member State:In 2014 the main focus with regard to the training of asylum officials in the Czech Republic was placed on inter-nal training and mentoring, mainly because two of EASO´s core modules were being translated into the Czech (and Slovak) language during that period, thus the training was postponed until early 2015 to make use of those newly translated modules.


4.7. Denmark

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Denmark2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Denmark is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminDenmarkfrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Denmark since 2010.

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinDenmarkbymodule(2014)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum was organised in Denmark in 2014.

Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinDenmarkbymodule(2010‑2014)

Please note that even though none national training session was held in Denmark in 2014, three participants from Denmark were trained in a ‘Joint Nordic’ session in the Exclusion module, which was organised by Sweden in 2014.

0

1

2

4

3

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Incl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Graph4:ParticipantsfromDenmarkintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

Graph5:ParticipantsfromDenmarkintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromDenmarkintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)


0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

2

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

2

4

6

8

10

2

8

2

0

2

0

2

1

3

5

4

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


4

2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

End

of P

rote

ction

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Incl

usio

n

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Excl

usio

n


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingsessionsdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinDenmark(2010‑2014)


Module


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Denmark


national training in Denmark


in T-t-T's sessions

No national training

delivered yet





delivered yet

Country of Origin

Information



delivered yet

Dublin Regulation



delivered yet




delivered yet

Evidence Assessme

nt



delivered yet




delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet




delivered yet


Rights



delivered yet


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet

Common European

Asylum System



delivered yet




delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromDenmarkintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 100 % of participants from Denmark registered in national training performed the task ‘Drafting and proposal of asylum decisions’.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 3 participants in ‘Joint Nordic’ session organised by Sweden, including data regarding tasks performed- Module: Exclusion

Section III:EASOTrainingExpertsPool:contentexpertsandtrainersnominatedbyDenmark

As of the end of 2014, Denmark did not nominate any content experts or trainers to the EASO Training and Expert Pool.

Summary

• No national training session has been organised in Denmark since 2010.

• Three participants from Denmark have been trained in the Exclusion module during a ‘Joint Nordic’ session organised by Sweden in 2014.

• In 2014 two participants from Denmark completed train-the-trainers’ sessions in the Country of Ori-gin Information module.

• Between 2010 and 2014 14 participants from Denmark attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• As of the end of 2014 Denmark did not nominate any content experts or trainers to the EASO Training and Expert Pool.

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Tasks performed by participants in national training as reported since July 2013Un

dert

akin

g of

firs

t fac

t-gat

herin

gin

terv

iew

s; re

gist

ratio

n; sc

reen

ing

and/

or re

ferr

al o

f inc

omin

g ca

ses

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

fas

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g p

artic

ipati

on in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of a

sylu

m d

ecisi

ons

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

erca

sew

orke

rs' a

sylu

m d

ecisi

ons

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or o

ther

case

wor

kers

' d

ecisi

ons a

t app

eal

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fra

ud(c

ance

llatio

n pr

oced

ures

)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

asy

lum

pro

cedu

ral g

uide

lines

Prod

uctio

n of

coun

try

repo

rts a

nd/o

rel

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

0% 0% 0% 0%

100%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%


4.8. Estonia

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Estonia2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Estonia is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminEstoniafrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Estonia since 2010.

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsbymoduleinEstonia(2014)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum was organised in Estonia in 2014.

Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinEstoniabymodule(2010‑2014)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Estonia since 2010.

Graph4:ParticipantsfromEstoniaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

Participants in train-the-trainers' sessions by module (2014)1 1

0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromEstoniaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromEstoniaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

1

2

3

4

5

7

6

4

3

0

6

2

0

1

4

3

2

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

End

of P

rote

ction

Incl

usio

n

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Excl

usio

n

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

3

2 2 2 2

1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingsessionsdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinEstonia(2010‑2014)


Module Total of


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Estonia



Estonia




delivered yet


Persons



delivered yet

Evidence Assessment



delivered yet




delivered yet

Dublin Regulation



delivered yet




delivered yet



delivered yet

Country of Origin



delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet




delivered yet


Rights



delivered yet

Common European

Asylum System



delivered yet

Module for managers



delivered yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromEstoniaintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

No data on the profile of participants from Estonia has been collected during the sample period.

Section III,EASOTrainingExpertsPool:contentexpertsandtrainersnominatedbyEstonia

Modules ContentExperts TrainersCountry of Origin Information 2Drafting and Decision Making 1Evidence Assessment 2Gender 1Interviewing Children 1International Refugee Law & Human Rights 1Interview Techniques 2Interviewing Vulnerable Persons 1Didactic 1Total number of nominations 12

Summary

• No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Estonia since 2010.

• Estonia has been using the EASO Training Curriculum mainly in the framework of train-the-trainers’ sessions. In 2014 two participants from Estonia completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions. The participants were trained to become national trainers in the Inclusion module and the Interview Tech-niques module.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 15 participants from Estonia attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• Experts and trainers nominated by Estonia cover 12 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.9. Finland

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Finland2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Finland is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminFinlandfrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinFinlandbymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

0

141 115

76

73

0

2

4

6

8

10

0

25

50

75

100

125

150



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

End

of P

rote

ctio

n

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctiv

e

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmat

ion

Inte

rnat

iona

l R

efug

ee L

aw a

nd H

uman

Rig

hts

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Dub

lin R

egul

atio

n

28

12 11 9 8

5

0

1

2

3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinFinlandbymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromFinlandintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

25

50

125

100

75

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Incl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

End

of P

rote

ction

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Excl

usio

n

112

96

83

67

2418

5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Participants in train-the-trainers' sessions by module (2014)1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromFinalndintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromFinalndintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4 4

0

1

4

3

2

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

End

of P

rote

ction

Excl

usio

n

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Incl

usio

n

3

2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinFinland(2010‑2014)


Module Total of


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Finland



Finland









Evidence Assessment




Country Of Origin

Information


2 national training

delivered



Persons




End of Protection


1 national training

delivered yet



in T-t-T's sessions






delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet

Exclusion 1 participation in T-t-T's sessions

Dublin Regulation


Module for Managers



Rights




Common European

Asylum System



Comments by Member State:It is noted that the decrease in the number of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum in 2013-2014 was caused by the decrease in the number of case officers employed in the Asylum Unit between 2012 and 2014. In addition, it is important to stress that each case officer has to follow at least one EASO training module each year.

Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromFinlandintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 78 % of participants registered in national training by Finland performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013-2014- 140 participants in national training in Finland, including data regarding tasks performed- 10 national training sessions- Modules: Inclusion, End of Protection, Country of Origin Information, Interview Techniques, Interviewing

Vulnerable Persons, Evidence Assessment

Section III,EASOTrainingExpertsPool:contentexpertsandtrainersnominatedbyFinland

Modules ContentExperts TrainersInterview Techniques 2

Evidence Assessment 1

Inclusion 1

Country of Origin Information 1

0%

25%

50%

75%


Unde

rtak

ing

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

gan

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

fas

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

nin

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of a

sylu

m d

ecisi

ons

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

erca

sew

orke

rs' a

sylu

m d

ecisi

ons

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or o

ther

case

wor

kers

' d

ecisi

ons a

t app

eal

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fra

ud(c

ance

llatio

n pr

oced

ures

)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

asy

lum

pro

cedu

ral g

uide

lines

Prod

uctio

n of

coun

try

repo

rts

and

/or e

ligib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

0%

78%

3%

78%

94%

25%

71%

10% 9% 11%

1%


Modules ContentExperts TrainersInterviewing Vulnerable Persons 1

End of Protection 1

CEAS 1Reception 1Total number of nominations 2 7

Summary

• Following the initial implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Finland in 2011 and 2012 the trend remains stable with over 70 participants trained in national sessions per year in 2013 and 2014.

• In 2014 an increase of 17 % has been observed with regard to the number of national training sessions organised compared to 2013 (seven national training sessions).

• The Evidence Assessment module ranked first in Finland in 2014 (28 participants) followed by the Country of Origin Information module (12 participants) and the Inclusion module (11 participants). The rest of participants has been trained in the Interviewing Vulnerable People module, the Interview-ing Techniques module and the End of Protection module.

• The End of Protection module has been used in national training for the first time in Finland in 2014.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 28 % of the Finnish participants in national training sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum have been trained in the Evidence Assessment module, 24 % in the Inclusion module and 20 % in the Drafting and Decision Making module.

• In 2014 four participants from Finland completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions. The participants have been trained to become national trainers in the following modules: Module for Managers, Exclu-sion, Dublin III Regulationand Evidence Assessment.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 14 participants from Finland attended train-the-trainers’ sessions and they completed the following modules: Interview Techniques, Drafting and Decision Making, Evidence Assessment, Module for Managers, Interviewing Children, Country of Origin Information, Dublin Reg-ulation, Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, End of Protection and Exclusion.

• The multiplier effect in Finland can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü Interviewing Techniques, with three participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and 5 national training sessions with 67 participants;

ü Drafting and Decision Making, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and seven national training sessions with 83 participants;

ü Evidence Assessment, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and four national training sessions with 112 participants;

ü Country of Origin Information, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and two national training sessions with 24 participants;

ü Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and two national training sessions with 18 participants;

ü End of Protection, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and one national training session with 5 participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that 94 % of trainees are responsible for drafting decisions on international protection. In addition, 78 % of them interview applicants for international protection and analyse facts and/or documentation following an asylum interview.

• Experts and trainers nominated by Finland cover 9 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.10. France

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:France2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in France is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminFrancefrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinFrancebymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

7

82

57

106

30

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

20

40

60

80

100

120



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Excl

usio

n

Incl

usio

n

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

End

of P

rote

ction

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

21

9

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000

1

2

3

0

5

10

15

20

25


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinFrancebymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromFranceintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2014)

0

25

50

175

150

125

100

75

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


161

2922 21 18

14 10 70 0 0 0 0 0

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

End

of P

rote

ction

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing


2

000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

3

2

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromFranceintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromFranceintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

2

4

8

6

7

5

3

2

5

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

5

4 4

2 2 2

1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0

1

2

3

4

5

6


Graph7:Multipliereffect:Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinFrance(2010‑2014)


Module Total of

participations in Train-the-Trainers' sessions


delivered in France


national training in France

Inclusion 5 participations in

T-t-T's sessions 11 national

trainingsdelivered




3 national trainings

delivered


Evidence Assessment



delivered


Exclusion 2 participations in T-t-T's sessions


delivered



Persons



delivered


Country of Origin

Information



delivered


End of Protection



delivered



Rights


1 nationaltraining

delivered





delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet



Dublin Regulation


Common European

Asylum System




Module for Managers



Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromFranceintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 79 % of participants registered in national training by France performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 71 participants in national training in France, including data regarding tasks performed- 7 national training sessions- Modules: Inclusion, Exclusion, End of Protection, Country of Origin Information, interviewing Vulnerable

Persons

Section III,EASOTrainingExpertsPool:contentexpertsandtrainersnominatedbyFrance

Modules ContentExperts TrainersInterview Techniques 1Evidence Assessment 1Exclusion 1 1CEAS 1Didactic trainers 2Total number of nominations 3 4

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

0%

79%

7%

82% 76%

10% 6%

24%

7% 11%

4%


Summary

• The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in France has varied over time, with a high point of 106 participants trained in 2013, followed by a decrease in 2014.

• In 2014 three national training sessions have been organised in France (-72 % compared to 2013).

• The Inclusion module ranked first in France in 2014 (21 participants) followed by the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module (nine participants).

• Between 2010 and 2014, 55 % of the French participants in national training sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum have been trained in the Inclusion module, 29 % in the Interview Techniques module and 22 % in the Exclusion module.

• In 2014 five participants from France completed train-the-trainers’ sessions (+150 % compared to 2013). Three participants have been trained to become national trainers in the Interview Techniques module and two participants have been trained to become national trainers in the Inclusion module.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 22 French participants attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in France can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü Inclusion, with five participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and 11 national training sessions with 161 participants;

ü Interview Techniques, with four participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and three national training sessions with 29 participants;

ü Evidence Assessment, with four participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and two national training sessions with 18 participants;

ü Exclusion, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and two national training sessions with 22 participants;

ü Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and two national training sessions with 21 participants;

ü Country of Origin Information, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and two national training sessions with 14 participants;

ü End of Protection, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and two national training sessions with 10 participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that 82 % of trainees are responsible for analysing facts and documentation following an asylum interview. In addition, 79 % of participants interview applicants for international protection, and 76 % draft decisions on international protection.

• Experts and trainers nominated by France cover seven positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.11. Germany

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Germany2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Germany is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminGermanyfrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinGermanybymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

3 0

4

71

165

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

020

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Excl

usio

n

Incl

usio

n

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

End

of P

rote

ction

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

107

58

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinGermanybymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromGermanyintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

25

50

125

100

75

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


clus

ion

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Excl

usio

n

107

69 67

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


3 3 3

2 2 2

1 1 1

0 0 0 00

4

3

2

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromGermanyintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromGermanyintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

5

10

25

20

15

7

13

6 6

22

0

3

6

9 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Incl

usio

n

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

End

of P

rote

ction

8

7

6 6 6

5

4

3 3

2 2

1 1

0


Graph7:Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinGermany(2010‑2014)


Module Total of


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Germany


national training in Germany

Dublin III Regulation




Inclusion 6 participations in

T-t-T's sessions 7 national trainings delivered


Evidence Assessment







delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet

Common European

Asylum System


Country of Origin

Information 6 participations in

T-t-T's sessions






Persons


Module for Managers





Rights



End of Protection



Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromGermanyintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 100 % of participants registered in national training by Germany performed the task ‘Prepara-tion and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 231 participants in national training in Germany, including data regarding tasks performed- 14 national training sessions- Modules: Inclusion, Dublin Regulation, Evidence Assessment

Section III,EASOTrainingExpertsPool:contentexpertsandtrainersnominatedbyGermany

Modules ContentExperts TrainersInterview Techniques 5 4Evidence Assessment 6 3Inclusion 1Country of Origin Information 2 2Interviewing Vulnerable Persons 4 3End of Protection 1 1CEAS 1Drafting and Decision Making 2 1Dublin Regulation 1 1International Refugee Law and Human Rights 1 1

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%


nder

taki

ng o

f firs

t fac

t-gat

herin

g in

terv

iew

s; re

gist

ratio

n; sc

reen

ing

and/

or re

ferr

al o

f inc

omin

g ca

ses

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

0%

100%

0%

100% 100%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%


Modules ContentExperts TrainersInterviewing Children 3 2Asylum Procedures Directive 2Gender 1Didactic 1Total number of nominations 31 18

Summary

• A significant increase in the implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum has been observed in Germany since 2013. While in 2012 only four participants took part in one national training session, this number increased to 71 in 2013 and 165 in 2014 (+132 % compared to 2013).

• In 2014, 12 national training sessions have been organised in Germany (+500 % compared to 2013).

• The Inclusion module ranked first in Germany in 2014 (107 participants) followed by the Evidence Assessment module (58 participants).

• Between 2010 and 2014, 44 % of the German participants in national sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum have been trained in the Inclusion module, 28 % in the Evidence Assessment module and 28 % in the Dublin III Regulation module.

• The Inclusion module has been used in national training for the first time in Germany in 2014.

• In 2014 22 participants completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions (+266 % compared to 2013). The participants have been trained to become national trainers in the following modules: Common European Asylum System, Dublin III Regulation, Inclusion, Country of Origin Information, Interview Techniques, Module for Managers, Evidence Assessment, Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, Interview-ing Children and Asylum Procedures Directive.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 54 German participants attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Germany can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü Dublin Regulation, with seven participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and three national training sessions with 67 participants;

ü Inclusion, with six participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and seven national training sessions with 107 participants;

ü Evidence Assessment, with four participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and six national training sessions with 69 participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants from Germany in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that all trainees are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection, analysing facts and documentation following an asylum interview and/or drafting decisions on international protection.

• Experts and trainers nominated by Germany cover 49 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.12. Greece

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Greece2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Greece is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminGreecefrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinGreecebymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

0 0

56

437

144

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

050

100150200250300350400450500



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4038

28

1611 11

0

1

2

3

4

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Excl

usio

n

Incl

usio

n

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

End

of P

rote

ction

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinGreecebymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromGreeceintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

20

40

160

140

120

100

80

60

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

End

of P

rote

ction

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

155

135

10398

40 3831

20 16

0 0 0 0 0


7

4

3

2

1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 00

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromGreeceintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromGreeceintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

10

30

20

0 0

23

19

26

0

10

8

6

4

2

12

18

16

14

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


16

87

6 65 5 5

32 2 2

10

Incl

usio

n

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

d

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingsessionsdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinGreece(2010‑2014)


Module


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Greece



Greece


in T-t-T's sessions


155 trainees in national

training





Common European

Asylum System




Evidence Assessment




training

Country of Origin

Information








Exclusion 3 participations

in T-t-T's sessions







training


Persons




Module for Managers



delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet


delivered yet




Rights


End of Protection





Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromGreeceintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 86 % of participants registered in national training by Greece performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 333 participants in national training in Greece, including data regarding tasks performed- 26 national training sessions- Modules: Common European Asylum System, Inclusion, Exclusion, Country of Origin Information, Interview

Techniques, Interviewing Children, Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, Evidence Assessment

Section III,EASOTrainingExpertsPool:contentexpertsandtrainersnominatedbyGreece

Modules ContentExperts TrainersInclusion -- 1Total number of nominations --- 1

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

5%

86% 86% 86% 86%

10% 7% 0% 2% 0% 0%


Summary

• Following the initial implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Greece with 437 participants trained in 2013, further 144 staff was trained in 2014. In 2014 12 national training sessions have been organised in Greece (-54 % compared to 2013).

• The Interviewing Children module ranked first in Greece in 2014 (40 participants) followed by the Exclusion module (38 participants) and the Inclusion module (28 participants). The other modules delivered in national training sessions were: Common European Asylum System, Interview Techniques and Evidence Assessment.

• The Interviewing Children, Exclusion and Common European Asylum System modules have been used for the first time in Greece in 2014.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 24 % of the participants from Greece in national sessions of the EASO Train-ing Curriculum have been trained in the Inclusion module, 21 % in the Interview Techniques module and 11 % in the Evidence Assessment module.

• In 2014 26 participants from Greece completed train-the-trainers’ sessions (+36 % compared to 2013). The Greek participants have been trained to become national trainers in seven different mod-ules (Module for Managers, Dublin III Regulation, Interviewing Children, Common European Asylum System, Inclusion, Exclusion, and Interview Techniques).

• Between 2010 and 2014, 68 participants from Greece attended EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Greece can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü Inclusion, with 16 participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and 10 national training sessions with 155 participants;

ü Drafting and Decision Making, with six participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training session with 20 participants;

ü Common European Asylum System, with six participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training session with 16 participants;

ü Evidence Assessment, with five participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and seven national training sessions with 105 participants;

ü Country of Origin Information, with five participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and five national training sessions with 98 participants;

ü Interviewing Children, with five participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and three national training sessions with 40 participants;

ü Exclusion, with three participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national train-ers and three national training sessions with 38 participants;

ü Interview Techniques, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and nine national training sessions with 135 participants;

ü Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and three national training sessions with 31 participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that 86 % of the trainees are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection, COI research, analys-ing facts and documentation following an asylum interview and/or drafting decisions on international protection.

• Greece has nominated one trainer to the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.13. Hungary

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Hungary2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Hungary is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminHungaryfrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinHungarybymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

0 0 0

38

152

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

53 5247

0

1

2

3

4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinHungarybymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromHungaryintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

10

20

60

50

40

30

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


53 5247

38

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

End

of P

rote

ction

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Participants in train-the-trainers' sessions by module (2014)

2

1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromHungaryintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromHungaryintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2011 2012 2013 2014


0

5

10

2

1

9

5

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Participation in train-the-trainers's sessions by module (2010-2014)D

ublin

Reg

ulati

on

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

3 3 3

2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

3


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinHungary(2010‑2014)


Module Total of


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Hungary


national training inHungary


in T-t-T's sessions




Persons




Evidence Assessment








Country of Origin

Information



delivered yet

Dublin Regulation



delivered yet




delivered yet


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet


Rights



delivered yet




delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet




delivered yet

Common European

Asylum System



delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromHungaryintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 88 % of participants registered in national training by Hungary performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 190 participants in national training in Hungary, including data regarding tasks performed- 10 national training sessions- Modules: Inclusion, Interview Techniques, Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, Evidence Assessment

Section III,EASOTrainingExpertsPool:contentexpertsandtrainersnominatedbyHungary

Modules ContentExperts TrainersEvidence Assessment 1 1Interviewing Vulnerable Persons 2 2Total number of nominations 3 3

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

0%

88%

0%

88% 88%

12% 12%

88%

12% 12%

0%


Summary

• A steady increase in implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum has been observed in Hungary since 2013. While in 2013 38 participants have been trained in national sessions in EASO training modules, in 2014 this number increased to 152 (+300 % compared to 2013).

• In 2014 eight national training sessions have been organised in Hungary (+300 % compared to 2013).

• The Inclusion module ranked first in Hungary in 2014 (53 participants) followed by the Interview Tech-niques module (52 participants) and the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module (47 participants).

• The Inclusion, Interview Techniques and Interviewing Vulnerable Persons modules have been used for the first time in Hungary in 2014.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 28 % of the Hungarian participants in national sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum have been trained in the Inclusion module, 27 % in the Interview Techniques module and 25 % in the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module.

• In 2014 five participants completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions (+80 % compared to 2013). The participants have been trained to become national trainers in the following modules: Drafting and Decision Making, Inclusion, Country of Origin Information and Dublin Regulation.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 17 Hungarian participants attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Hungary can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü Inclusion, with three participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national train-ers and 23 national training sessions with 53 participants;

ü Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, with three participants trained within the train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and two national training sessions with 47 participants;

ü Evidence Assessment, with three participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and two national training sessions with 38 participants;

ü Interview Techniques, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and three national training sessions with 52 participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that 88 % of the trainees are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection, analysing facts and documentation following an asylum interview, drafting decisions on international protection and/or investigating refugee fraud (cancellation procedures).

• Experts and trainers nominated by Hungary cover six positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.14. Ireland

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Ireland2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Ireland is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminIrelandfrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinIrelandbymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

35

23

16 10 14

0

1

2

3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

14

00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Incl

usio

n

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinIrelandbymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromIrelandintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

20

40

100

80

60

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Participants in national training sessions by module (2010-2014)Co

untr

y of

Orig

inIn

form

ation

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Excl

usio

n

Incl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

98

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromIrelandintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromIrelandintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

5

10

8

5

1 1 1

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

7

4

2

1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinIreland(2010‑2014)


Module Total of



delivered in Ireland


national training in Ireland

Country of Origin

Information 7 participations in

T-t-T's sessions 7 national

trainings delivered 98 trainees in

national training

Dublin Regulation



yet




yet




yet


Persons



yet




yet


Rights



yet

Evidence Assessment



yet

Inclusion No participation in T-t-T's sessions


yet

Module for Managers



yet

Exclusion No participation in T-t-T's sessions


yet




yet

End of Protection



yet

Common European

Asylum System



yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromIrelandintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 88 % of participants registered in national training by Ireland performed the task ‘COI research (including participation in fact-finding missions)’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 8 participants in national training in Ireland, including data regarding tasks performed- 1 national training session- Modules: Country of Origin Information

Section III, EASO Training and Expert Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbyIreland

Modules ContentExperts TrainersCountry of Origin Information -- 1 Interviewing Children 1 1 Interview Techniques -- 1 Total number of nominations 1 3

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

0% 0%

88%

0%

25%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

13%


Summary

• Following the initial implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Ireland in 2010 and 2011 the trend remains stable and amounts to over 10 participants per year (16 participants trained in 2012, 10 in 2013 and 14 in 2014).

• In 2014 one national training sessions has been organised in Ireland (stable compared to 2013).

• The Country of Origin Information module was the only module delivered in Ireland in 2014.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 98 participants from Ireland have completed national training sessions in the EASO Training Curriculum. All training sessions were delivered in the Country of Origin Information module.

• In 2014 one participant from Ireland completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ session in the Dublin III Regulationmodule.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 16 participants from Ireland attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Ireland can be observed on the basis of the Country of Origin Information module, with seven participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and seven national training sessions with 98 participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that 88 % of the trainees are responsible for COI research.

• Experts and trainers nominated by Ireland cover 4 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.15. Italy

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Italy2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Italy is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminItalyfrom2010to2014(participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinItalybymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

0 0 0 0

79

0

1

2

3

0

20

40

60

80

100



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

79

0

1

3

2

00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

End

of P

rote

ction

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Incl

usio

n

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinItalybymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromItalyintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

20

40

80

60

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Participants in national training sessions by module (2010-2014)79

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Incl

usio

n

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

gVu

lner

able

Per

sons

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


3

2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromItalyintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromItalyintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

10

20

0

4

2 3

16

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

7

5

4

3

2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

3

4

5

6

7


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinItaly(2010‑2014)


Module


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Italy


national training in Italy






in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet

Country of Origin

Information



delivered yet




delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet




delivered yet

Evidence Assessment



delivered yet


Persons



delivered yet

Dublin Regulation



delivered yet


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet


Rights



delivered yet




delivered yet

Common European

Asylum System



delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromItalyintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 99 % of participants registered in national training by Italy performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 78 participants in national training in Italy, including data regarding tasks performed- 2 national training sessions- Module: Interview Techniques

Section III,EASOTrainingExpertsPool:contentexpertsandtrainersnominatedbyItaly

Modules ContentExperts TrainersDidactic 1 --Total number of nominations 1 --

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%


nder

taki

ng o

f firs

t fac

t-gat

herin

g in

terv

iew

s; re

gist

ratio

n; sc

reen

ing

and/

or re

ferr

al o

f inc

omin

g ca

ses

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

12%

99%

83%

94% 100%

1% 4% 1% 0% 0% 0%


Summary

• The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Italy started in 2014.

• In 2014 two national training sessions were organised and 79 participants trained (no session in 2013).

• The Interview Techniques module was the only module used in Italy in 2014.

• In 2014, 16 participants from Italy completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions (+433 % compared to 2013). The Italian participants were trained to become national trainers in the following modules: Inclusion, Interview Techniques, Interviewing Children, Country of Origin Information and Evidence Assessment.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 25 Italian participants attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Italy can be observed on the basis of the Interview Techniques module, with three participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and two national training sessions with 79 participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that 100 % of train-ees are responsible for drafting decisions on international protection. In addition, 99 % of the partici-pants interview applicants for international protection and/or 94 % analyse facts and documentation following an asylum interview.

• Italy has nominated one expert to the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.16. Latvia

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Latvia2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Latvia is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressoftheEASOTrainingCurriculuminLatviafrom2010to2014(participants+sessions)

Two Latvian participants attended a training session in the EASO Training Curriculum in the Inclusion module, which was organised within the ‘Prague Process’ project in January 2013 in Warsaw.

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinLatviabymodule(2014)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Latvia in 2014.

Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinLatviabymodule(2010‑2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

2

0

1

0

1

2

3

4

5

0

1

2 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Incl

usio

n

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

U As

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Excl

usio

n

Draft

ing

and

Dec

ision

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

w Te

chni

ques

Dubl

in R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

ePe

rson

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Asse

ssm

ent

2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Graph4:ParticipantsfromLatviaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

Graph5:ParticipantsfromLatviaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromLatviaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)


2 2 2 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2In

clus

ion

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

5

10

1

5

7 78

0

3

2

1

4

7

6

5

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

6

4 4 4

3 3

2

1 1

0 0 0 0 0


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinLatvia(2010‑2014)


Module Total of


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Latvia



Latvia


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet


Country of Origin

Information



delivered yet




delivered yet

Evidence Assessment



delivered yet




delivered yet

Dublin Regulation



delivered yet


Rights



delivered yet




delivered yet

CEAS (including EU Asylum and Policy)



delivered yet




delivered yet

End of protection



delivered yet


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet




delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromLatviaintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

No data on the profile of participants from Latvia has been collected during the sample period.

Section III, EASO Training and Experts Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbyLatvia

As of the end of 2014, Latvia did not nominate any content experts or trainers to the EASO Training and Expert Pool.

Summary

• No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Latvia since 2010.

• Two participants from Latvia attended a training session in the EASO Training Curriculum in the Inclu-sion module, which was organised within the ‘Prague Process’ project in January 2013 in Warsaw.

• Latvia has been using the EASO Training Curriculum mainly in the framework of train-the-trainers’ sessions. In 2014 eight participants completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions (+28 % compared to 2013). The participants have been trained to become national trainers in the following modules: Country of Origin Information, Interview Techniques, Inclusion and Dublin Regulation.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 28 participants from Latvia attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• As of the end of 2014 Latvia did not nominate any content experts or trainers to the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.17. Lithuania

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Lithuania2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Lithuania is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminLithuaniafrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Lithuania since 2010.

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsbymoduleinLithuania(2014)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Lithuania in 2014.

Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinLithuaniabymodule(2010‑2014)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Lithuania since 2010.

Graph4:ParticipantsfromLithuaniaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)


2 2

1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromLithuaniaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromLithuaniaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

2

4

6

0

1

0

4

6

0

3

2

1

4 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Incl

usio

n

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

3

2 2

1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinLithuania(2010‑2014)


Module Total of


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Lithuania


national training in Lithuania

Dublin Regulation



delivered yet

Country of Origin

Information



delivered yet




delivered yet


Persons



delivered yet

Evidence Assessment



delivered yet




delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet

Common European

Asylum System



delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet




delivered yet


Rights



delivered yet


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet




delivered yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromLithuaniaintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

No data on the profile of participants from Lithuania has been collected during the sample period.

Section III, EASO Training and Experts Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbyLithuania

As of the end of 2014, Lithuania did not nominate any content experts or trainers to the EASO Training and Expert Pool.

Summary

• No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Lithuania since 2010.

• Lithuania has been using the EASO Training Curriculum only in the framework of train-the-trainers’ sessions. In 2014 six participants from Lithuania completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions (+50 % compared to 2013). They have been trained to become national trainers in the following modules: Interview Techniques, Country of Origin Information, Module for Managers and Dublin Regulation.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 11 participants from Lithuania attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• As of the end of 2014 Lithuania did not nominate any content experts or trainers to the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.18. Luxembourg

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Luxembourg2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Luxembourg is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminLuxembourgfrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinLuxembourgbymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

0 0

26

16

11

0

1

2

3

4

0

5

10

15

20

25

30



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

11

0

1

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Incl

usio

n

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph3:Participantsinnationaltrainingsessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromLuxembourgintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)


1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

0

4

2

6

16

14

12

10

8

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


clus

ion

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Excl

usio

n

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

16

1211

8

6

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Graph5:ParticipantsfromLuxembourgintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromLuxembourgintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

0

3

2

1

4

5 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

End

of P

rote

ction

4

3

1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

2

4

8

6

0

2

7

2 2


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingsessionsdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinLuxembourg(2010‑2014)


Module


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Luxembourg



Luxembourg


in T-t-T's sessions

1 national training

delivered


Country of Origin

Information


1 national training

delivered



Persons


1 national training

delivered




1 national training

delivered




1 national training

delivered


Evidence Assessment



delivered yet

InterviewingChildren



delivered yet

Dublin Regulation



delivered yet




delivered yet


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet

Common European

Asylum System



delivered yet

International Refugee

Law and Human Rights



delivered yet


Section II, Profile of participants from Luxembourg in the EASO TrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 100 % of participants registered in national training by Luxembourg performed the task ‘Prepa-ration and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 8 participants in national training in Luxembourg, including data regarding tasks performed- 1 national training session- Module: Interviewing Vulnerable Persons

Section III, EASO Training and Expert Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbyLuxembourg

As of the end of 2014, Luxembourg did not nominate any content experts or trainers to the EASO Training and Expert Pool.

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%


nder

taki

ng o

f firs

t fac

t-gat

herin

g in

terv

iew

s; re

gist

ratio

n; sc

reen

ing

and/

or re

ferr

al o

f inc

omin

g ca

ses

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

0%

100%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%


Summary

• Following the initial implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Luxembourg in 2012 and 2013, in 2014 11 participants completed EASO training. In 2014 one national training session has been organised in Luxembourg (stable compared to 2013). The session was organised in the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module and 11 participants were trained.

• The Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module has been used for the first time in Luxembourg in 2014.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 30 % of the participants from Luxembourg in national sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum have been trained in the Inclusion module, 23 % in the Country of Origin Informa-tion module and 21 % in the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module.

• In 2014 two participants completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions (stable compared to 2013). The participants have been trained to become national trainers in the Dublin III Regulation module and the Evidence Assessment module.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 13 participants from Luxembourg attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Luxembourg can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü Inclusion, with four participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training session with 16 participants;

ü Country of Origin Information, with three participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training session with 12 participants;

ü Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and one national training session with 11 participants;

ü Interview Techniques, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and one national training session with eight participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that all trainees are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection.

• As of the end of 2014 Luxembourg did not nominate any content experts or trainers to the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.19. Malta

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Malta2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Malta is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminMaltafrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Malta since 2010.

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinMaltabymodule(2014)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Malta in 2014.

Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinMaltabymodule(2010‑2014)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Malta since 2010.

Graph4:ParticipantsfromMaltaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)


5

1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

5

1

2

3

4

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromMaltaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromMaltaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

5

10

20

15

0

11

15

108

0

3

2

1

4

9

8

7

6

5

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Incl

usio

n

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

End

of P

rote

ction

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Excl

usio

n

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

8

6 6

4 4

3 3

2 2 2 2

1 1

0


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinMalta(2010‑2014)


Module


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Malta



Malta

InterviewintChildren



delivered yet


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet

Country of Origin

Information



delivered yet

Evidence Assessment



delivered yet

CEAS (including EU

Law and Policy



delivered yet




delivered yet




delivered yet


Persons



delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet


Rights



delivered yet




delivered yet

Asylum Procedures Directive



delivered yet



delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromMaltaintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

No data on the profile of participants from Malta in the EASO Training Curriculum has been collected during the sample period.

Section III, EASO Training and Experts Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbyMalta

Modules ContentExperts TrainersAsylum Procedures Directive 1 Reception 1 Total number of nominations 2

Summary

• No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Malta since 2010.

• Malta has been using the EASO Training Curriculum mainly in the framework of train-the-trainers’ sessions. In 2014 eight participants completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions (- 20 % compared to 2013). The participants have been trained to become national trainers in the following modules: Interviewing Children, Inclusion, Country of Origin Information and Interviewing Vulnerable Persons.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 44 participants from Malta attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• Experts nominated by Malta cover two positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.20. Netherlands

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Netherlands2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in the Netherlands presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminNetherlandsfrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsintheNetherlandsbymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

25

41

260 226

415

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

159

7566

6117 15

14 80 0 0 0 0 0

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

End

of P

rote

ctio

n

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctiv

e

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmat

ion

Inte

rnat

iona

l R

efug

ee L

aw a

nd H

uman

Rig

hts

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Dub

lin R

egul

atio

n


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsintheNetherlandsbymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromtheNetherlandsintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


terv

iew

ing

Vuln

erab

lePe

rson

s

Incl

usio

n

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

396

240

116

69 6133 29 15 8 0 0 0 0 0


7

54

21

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

10

2

4

6

8

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromtheNetherlandintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromtheNetherlandsintrain‑the‑trainers’ssessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

5

10

20

15

17

1210

5

19

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

0

2

4

6

8

10

1212

98 8

54

32 2 2

100

7


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedintheNetherlands(2010‑2014)


Module Total of


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Netherlands



Netherlands


in T-t-T's sessions



training


Persons




training









Evidence Assessment




training

Dublin Regulation




End of Protection





in T-t-T's sessions



Common European

Asylum System


1 national training

delivered





delivered yet




delivered yet

Country of Origin



delivered yet




delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet


Section II, Profile of participants from Netherlands in the EASO TrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 93 % of participants registered in national training by Netherlands performed the task ‘Prepa-ration and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 508 participants in national training in Netherlands, including data regarding tasks performed- 45 national training sessions- Modules: Common European Asylum System, Inclusion, Exclusion, End of Protection, Interview Techniques,

Interviewing Children, Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, Evidence Assessment

Comments by Member State:In the Netherlands there is no distinction between ‘asylum officers’ and ‘senior asylum officers’ in the subscrip-tion for national training courses as it is administratively burdensome. However, senior asylum officers, making up the last category, are also joining national training courses. Senior asylum officers are responsible for ‘super-vision/review of other caseworkers’ asylum decisions’.

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

93% 93%

0% 0%

93%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

13%


Section III, EASO Training and Experts Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbyNetherlands

Modules ContentExperts TrainersCommon European Asylum System 1 1Drafting and Decision Making 1 1Dublin Regulation 2 1Evidence Assessment 1 1End of Protection 1 1Exclusion 1 1Gender 1 --Inclusion 1 1Interview Techniques 1 1Interviewing Children 1 1Interviewing Vulnerable Persons 2 2Module for Managers 1 --Reception 3 --Didactic 1 --Didactic trainers -- 3Total number of nominations 18 14

Comments by Member State:The three content experts nominated for ‘Reception’ are employed by the Central Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers. The same goes for one of the three trainers nominated as Didactic trainers.

Summary

• In 2014 a significant increase in the implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum has been observed in the Netherlands. In total 35 national training sessions have been organised in the Nether-lands (+59 % compared to 2013) with 415 participants trained (+84 % compared to 2013).

• The Inclusion module ranked first in the Netherlands in 2014 (159 participants) followed by the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module (75 participants) and the Evidence Assessment module (66 participants).

• The Interview Techniques module has been used for the first time in the Netherlands in 2014.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 41 % of the Dutch participants in national sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum have been trained in the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module, 25 % in the Inclusion module and 12 % in the Evidence Assessment module.

• In 2014, 10 participants completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers in the following modules: Inclusion, Interview Techniques, Interviewing Children, Evidence Assessment and Exclusion. Furthermore, nine participants completed train-the-trainers’ sessions organised by the Netherlands (one session in the Interview Techniques module with five participants and one session in the Interviewing Children module with four participants).

• Between 2010 and 2014, 63 Dutch participants attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.


• The multiplier effect in the Netherlands can be observed on the basis of the following modules:


ü Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, with nine participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and 35 national training sessions with 396 participants;

ü Interviewing Children, with eight participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and six national training sessions with 69 participants;

ü Interview Techniques, with eight participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and five national training sessions with 61 participants;

ü Evidence Assessment, with seven participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and 10 national training sessions with 116 participants;

ü Dublin III Regulation, with five participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and three national training sessions with 15 participants.

ü End of Protection, with three participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and three national training sessions with 29 participants;

ü Exclusion, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and four national training sessions with 33 participants;

ü Common European Asylum System, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training session with eight participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that 93 % of the trainees are responsible for undertaking the first fact-gathering interview/registration/screening/referral of incoming cases; interviewing applicants for international protection, and/or drafting deci-sions on international protection.

• Experts and trainers nominated by the Netherlands cover 32 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.

Comments by Member State:In addition to the information provided above, it is noted that in 2009 one participant completed the train-the-trainers’ session in the Country of Origin Information module.


4.21. Norway

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Norway2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Norway is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminNorwayfrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinNorwaybymodule(2014)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Norway in 2014.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

0

13

0 0 0 0

1

2

0

5

10

15


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinNorwaybymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromNorwayintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Incl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

13

2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


2

11

00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromNorwayintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromNorwayintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

1

2

5

4

3

1

3

2

0

4

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

End

of P

rote

ction

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

U A

sylu

m L

aw a

nd P

olic

y)

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

3

2

1

1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1

2

3


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinNorway(2010‑2014)


ModuleTotal of


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Norway

Total of participants in national training in

Norway



1 national training

delivered


training

Exclusion No

participation in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet


Dublin Regulation



delivered yet

Evidence Assessment



delivered yet

Inclusion 1 participation

in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet




delivered yet

Exclusion 1 participation

in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet


No participation in

T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet


Persons

No participation in

T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet

Country of Origin

Information

No participation in

T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet


Rights

No participation in

T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet


No participation in

T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet

Common European

Asylum System

No participation in

T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet

Module for Managers

No participation in

T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromNorwayintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 100 % of participants from Norway registered in national training performed the task ‘Drafting and proposal of asylum decisions’.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- Data provided from the ‘Joint Nordic’ session on Exclusion with two participants from Norway Module:

Exclusion

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%


nder

taki

ng o

f firs

t fac

t-gat

herin

g in

terv

iew

s; re

gist

ratio

n; sc

reen

ing

and/

or re

ferr

al o

f inc

omin

g ca

ses

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

0% 0% 0% 0%

100%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%


Section III, EASO Training and Experts Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbyNorway

Modules ContentExperts TrainersDrafting and Decision Making 1 1Dublin Regulation 2 1Evidence Assessment 1 1Exclusion 1 1Interviewing Children 4 3Inclusion 1 1 Interview Techniques 4 4 Interviewing Vulnerable Persons 1 1 Reception 2 --Didactic 1 --Didactic trainers -- 1Total number of nominations 19 14

Summary

• No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Norway in 2014. The only national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum in Norway was organised in 2011.

• Two participants from Norway attended a ‘Joint Nordic’ training session in the Exclusion module, which was organised by Sweden in 2014.

• In 2014 four participants completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions. They were trained to become national trainers in the following modules: Dublin Regulation, Evidence Assessment and Inclusion.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 10 participants from Norway attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Norway can be observed on the basis of the Interviewing Children module, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and one national training session organised with 13 participants.

• Experts and trainers nominated by Norway cover 33 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.22. Poland

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Poland2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Poland is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressoftheEASOTrainingCurriculuminPolandfrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinPolandbymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

42

50

0

11 11

0

1

2

3

4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

11

0

1

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Incl

usio

n

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

sD

raft

ing

and

Dec

isio

n M

akin

g

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinPolandbymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromPolandintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

45

40

35

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Incl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

End

of P

rote

ction

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Excl

usio

n

41

27

1816

11

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


4

1

000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

3

4

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromPolandintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromPolandintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

5

10

20

1515 15

54

5

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

U A

sylu

m L

aw a

nd P

olic

y)

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

0

1

2

4

3

6

5

7

8

9

1010

8

5 4

3 3

2 2 2 2

1 1 10


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinPoland(2010‑2014)


Module Total of


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Poland



Poland

Drafting and

Decision Making


1 national training

delivered


International Refugee Law and

Human Rights


1 national training

delivered



in T-t-T's sessions



Evidence Assessment


1 national training

delivered




1 national training

delivered


Dublin Regulation



delivered yet

Country of Origin

Information



delivered yet


Persons



delivered yet

CEAS (including EU Asylum Law and Policy)



delivered yet

Asylum Procedures Directive



delivered yet




delivered yet



delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromPolandintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 95 % of participants registered in national training by Poland performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 20 participants in national training in Poland, including data regarding tasks performed- 2 national training sessions- Modules: Inclusion, Interview Techniques

Section III, EASO Training and Experts Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbyPoland

Modules ContentExperts TrainersAsylum Procedures Directive 1 1Country of Origin Information 4 1Drafting and Decision Making 4 2Dublin Regulation 4 1Evidence Assessment 4 2Inclusion 4 2Interview Techniques 1 1Reception 2 Total number of nominations 24 10

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%


nder

taki

ng o

f firs

t fac

t-gat

herin

g in

terv

iew

s; re

gist

ratio

n; sc

reen

ing

and/

or re

ferr

al o

f inc

omin

g ca

ses

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

0%

95%

0%

95%

85%

5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%


Summary

• Following the initial implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Poland in 2010 and 2011, since 2013 the trend is stable and amounts to 11 participants each year.

• In 2014 one national training session has been organised in Poland with 11 participants trained (stable compared to 2013).

• The Inclusion module was the only module delivered in Poland in 2014.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 36 % of the participants from Poland in national sessions of the EASO Train-ing Curriculum have been trained in the Evidence Assessment module, 24 % in the Inclusion module and 16 % in the Drafting and Decision Making module.

• In 2014 five participants completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions (+25 % compared to 2013). The participants have been trained to become national trainers in the Dublin III Regulation Module and the Country of Origin Information module.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 44 participants from Poland attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Poland can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü Drafting and Decision Making, with three participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training session with 18 participants;

ü International Refugee Law & Human Rights, with three participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training session with 16 participants;

ü Inclusion, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and two national training sessions with 27 participants;

ü Evidence Assessment, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training session with 41 participants;

ü Interview Techniques, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training session with 11 participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that 95 % of the trainees are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection and/or analysing facts and documentation following an asylum interview. In addition, 85 % of the trainees from Poland are dealing with drafting decisions on international protection.

• Experts and trainers nominated by Poland cover 34 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.23. Portugal

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Portugal2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Portugal is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminPortugalfrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Portugal since 2010.

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinPortugalbymodule(2014)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Portugal in 2014.

Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinPortugalbymodule(2010‑2014)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Portugal since 2010.

Graph4:ParticipantsfromPortugalintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)


1

0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromPortugalintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromPortugalintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

1

2

3

0 0 0

2

1

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

1 1

1

0 0 0 0 0 0000000

1


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinPortugal(2010‑2014)


Module Total of


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Portugal



Portugal



delivered yet




delivered yet

Common European

Asylum System



delivered yet

Country of Origin

Information



delivered yet




delivered yet


Persons



delivered yet

Evidence Assessment



delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet

Dublin Regulation

No participations in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet




delivered yet


Rights



delivered yet


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet




delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromPortugalintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

No data on the profile of participants from Portugal has been collected during the sample period.

Section III, EASO Training and Experts Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbyPortugal

Modules ContentExperts TrainersCountry of Origin Information 2Drafting and Decision Making 1 1Dublin Regulation 1 1Evidence Assessment 1 1Inclusion 1 1Total number of nominations 6 4

Summary

• No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Portugal since 2010.

• In 2014, one participant from Portugal completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions in the Inclusion module.

• Between 2010 and 2014, three participants from Portugal attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• Experts and trainers nominated by Portugal cover 10 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.24. Romania

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Romania2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Romania is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressoftheEASOTrainingCurriculuminRomaniafrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinRomaniabymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

23 25

40

5

36

0

1

2

3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

18 18

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

sD

ublin

Reg

ulati

on

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Excl

usio

n

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

End

of P

rote

ction

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinRomaniabymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromRomaniaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

No participants from Romania took part in train-the-trainers’ sessions in 2014.

Graph5:ParticipantsfromRomaniaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

0

10

20

30

40

70

60

50

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Participants in national training sessions by module (2010-2014)Co

untr

y of

Orig

inIn

form

ation

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

60

2521

18

50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

2

4

6

5

0

4 4

0


Graph6:ParticipantsfromRomaniaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

U A

sylu

m L

aw a

nd P

olic

y)

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

2 2

2 2

1 1 1 1

00000

1

0

1

2


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinRomania(2010‑2014)


Module Total of


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Romania


national training in Romania


in T-t-T's sessions

1 national training

delivered



Persons


1 national training

delivered




1 national training

delivered


Country of Origin






1 national training

delivered



Rights



delivered yet

Evidence Assessment



delivered yet




delivered yet




delivered yet




delivered yet


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet




delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromRomaniaintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 58 % of participants registered in national training by Romania performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 36 participants in national training in Romania- 2 national training sessions- Modules: Country of Origin Information, Interviewing Vulnerable Persons

Section III,EASOTrainingExpertsPool:contentexpertsandtrainersnominatedbyRomania

Modules ContentExperts Trainers

Country of Origin Information 2 1Drafting and Decision Making 1 --Dublin Regulation -- 1Evidence Assessment 1 1Inclusion -- 1Interview Techniques -- 1Interviewing Vulnerable Persons -- 2Total number of nominations 4 7

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

72%

58%

19%

64% 56%

0%

25%

39%

17%

8%

0%


Summary

• The trend in the implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Romania has varied over time. While in 2012, 40 participants were trained in the EASO training modules, in 2013 this number decreased to five and in 2014 it increased to 36 participants (+620 % compared to 2013).

• In 2014 two national training sessions have been organised in Romania (+100 % compared to 2013).

• The Interviewing Vulnerable Persons and Country of Origin Information modules ranked both first in Romania in 2014 (18 participants each).

• The Interviewing Vulnerable Persons has been used for the first time in Romania in 2014.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 47 % of the participants from Romania in national sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum have been trained in the Country of Origin Information module, 19 % in the Draft-ing and Decision Making module and 16 % in the Inclusion module.

• In 2014 no participants from Romania completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 13 Romanian participants attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Romania can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü Inclusion, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training session with 21 participants;

ü Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training session with 18 participants;

ü Dublin III Regulation, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training session with five participants;

ü Country of Origin Information, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and four national training sessions with 60 participants;

ü Drafting and Decision Making, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and one national training session with 25 participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that 72 % of the trainees are responsible for undertaking first fact-gathering interview/registration/screening/referral of incoming cases. In addition, 64 % of the participants analyse facts and documentation following an asylum interview and 58 % interview applicants for international protection.

• Experts and trainers nominated by Romania cover 11 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.25. Slovakia

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Slovakia2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Slovakia is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminSlovakiafrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinSlovakiabymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

5

27

20

0

28

0

1

2

3

4

0

5

10

15

20

25

30



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

25

30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0

1

2

3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Inte

rvie

win

gVu

lner

able

Per

sons

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

End

ofPr

otec

tion

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

sD

ublin

Reg

ulati

on

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinSlovakiabymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromSlovakiaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

5

10

15

30

25

20

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


terv

iew

ing

Vuln

erab

lePe

rson

s

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

25

18 17 17

30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


5

1 1

00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

5

4

3

2

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromSlovakiaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromSlovakiaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

5

10

4

21

3

7

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

6

2 2 2 2

1 1 1

0000000

1

2

3

4

5

6


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinSlovakia(2010‑2014)


Module Total of


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Slovakia



Slovakia



1 national training

delivered



Persons




Country Of Origin

Information






1 national training

delivered




1 national training

delivered



in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet




delivered yet



delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet




delivered yet

Evidence Assessment



delivered yet


Rights



delivered yet

Dublin Regulation



delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromSlovakiaintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 79 % of participants registered in national training by Slovakia performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 28 participants in national training in Slovakia, including data regarding tasks performed- 3 national training sessions- Modules: Interviewing Children, Interviewing Vulnerable Persons

Section III, EASO Training and Experts Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbySlovakia

Modules ContentExperts TrainersCountry of Origin Information 2 --Interviewing Children -- 1Interviewing Vulnerable Persons 1 --Reception 1 --Total number of nominations 4 1

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

7%

79%

0%

11%

71%

4% 7%

0%

14%

4% 0%


Summary

• The trend in the implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Slovakia has varied since 2010, with a significant increase observed in 2014.

• In 2014 three national training sessions have been organised in Slovakia (no training session in 2013). During these three sessions 28 participants have been trained (no participants in 2013).

• The Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module ranked first in Slovakia in 2014 (25 participants) followed by the Interviewing Children module (3 participants).

• The Interviewing Vulnerable Persons and Interviewing Children modules have been used for the first time in Slovakia in 2014.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 31 % of the Slovak participants in national sessions of the EASO Training Cur-riculum have been trained in the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module, and 23 % in the EU Asylum Law and Policy module.

• In 2014 seven participants completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions. They have been trained to become national trainers in the following modules: Common European Asylum System, Interviewing Children and Inclusion.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 17 Slovakian participants attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Slovakia can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü EU Asylum Law and Policy (currently: Common European Asylum System), with six participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training ses-sion with 18 participants;

ü Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and two national training sessions with 25 participants;

ü Country of Origin Information, with two participants trained in the train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and three national training sessions with 17 participants;

ü Interviewing Children, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and one national training session with three participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that 79 % of the trainees are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection. In addition, 71 % of the participants draft decisions on international protection.

• Experts and trainers nominated by Slovakia cover four positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.26. Slovenia

Section II, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Slovenia2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Slovenia is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminSloveniafrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinSloveniabymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

0 0 0 0

39

0

1

2

3

4

5

05

1015202530354045



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

31

8

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

3

4

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Incl

usio

n

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinSloveniabymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromSloveniaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

5

10

15

35

30

25

20

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


31

8

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

End

of P

rote

ction

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Incl

usio

n

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

UAs

ylum

Law

and

Pol

icy)

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


1

0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromSloveniaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromSloveniaintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

2

4

6

0 0 0

5

1

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

U A

sylu

m L

aw a

nd P

olic

y)

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinSlovenia(2010‑2014)


Module Total of



delivered in Slovenia


national training in Slovenia


Persons




End of Protection






yet




yet

Evidence Assessment



yet

Country of Origin

Information



yet


No participations in T-t-T's sessions


yet




yet




yet

Exclusion No participation in

T-t-T's sessions No national

training delivered yet

Common European

Asylum System



yet


Rights



yet




yet

Module for Managers



yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromSloveniaintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 37 % of participants registered in national training by Slovenia performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 38 participants in national training in Slovenia- 2 national training sessions- Modules: Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, End of Protection

Section III, EASO Training and Experts Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbySlovenia

Modules ContentExpertsnominated TrainersnominatedAsylum Procedures Directive 1 --Country of Origin Information 1 --Drafting and Decision Making 2 --Dublin Regulation 1 --Total number of nominations 5 --

0%

25%

50%

75%


Und

erta

king

of fi

rst f

act-g

athe

ring

inte

rvie

ws;

regi

stra

tion;

scre

enin

g an

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f as

ylum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

n in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g an

asy

lum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f oth

er

case

wor

kers

' asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or

othe

r cas

ewor

kers

' dec

ision

s at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

im

plem

enta

tion

of a

sylu

m p

roce

dura

l gu

idel

ines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts a

nd/o

r el

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

29% 37%

5%

37% 37%

0% 5%

0% 0% 0%

29%


Summary

• The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Slovenia started in 2014.

• In 2014 four national training sessions have been organised in Slovenia with 39 participants trained (no session organised in 2013).

• The Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module ranked first in 2014 (31 participants and three national sessions) followed by the End of Protection module (eight participants and one national session).

• The Interviewing Vulnerable Persons and End of Protection modules have been used for the first time in Slovenia in 2014.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 79 % of the participants from Slovenia in national sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum have been trained in the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module and 21 % in the End of Protection module.

• One participant completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions in 2014. The participant has been trained to become a national trainer in the Inclusion module.

• Between 2010 and 2014, six Slovenian participants attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Slovenia can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become a national trainer and three national training sessions with 31 participants;

ü End of Protection, with one participant trained in train-the-trainers’ session to become a national trainer and one national training session with eight participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that 37 % of the trainees are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection, analysing facts and documentation following an asylum interview and/or drafting decisions on international protection.

• Experts nominated by Slovenia cover five positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.27. Spain

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Spain2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Spain is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminSpainfrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Spain since 2010.

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinSpainbymodule(2014)

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Spain in 2014.

Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinSpainbymodule(2010‑2014):

No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Spain since 2010.

Graph4:ParticipantsfromSpainintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

No participant from Spain attended EASO’s train-the-trainers’ session in 2014.


Graph5:ParticipantsfromSpainintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromSpainintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

1

2

4

33

0

1

2

0

0

1

3

2

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

End

of P

rote

ction

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Incl

usio

n

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Excl

usio

n

2

1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingsessionsdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinSpain(2010‑2014)


Module


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Spain



Spain




delivered yet




delivered yet




delivered yet

III Regulation 1 participation in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet

Common European

Asylum System



delivered yet


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet

Evidence Assessment



delivered yet


Persons



delivered yet




delivered yet

Country of Origin

Information



delivered yet


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet


Rights



delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromSpainintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

No data on the profile of participants from Spain has been collected during the sample period.

Section III, EASO Training and Experts Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbySpain

Modules ContentExperts TrainersAsylum Procedures Directive 1 1Total number of nominations 1 1

Summary

• No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in Spain since 2010.

• In 2014 no participant from Spain completed the EASO’s train-the-trainers’ session (compared to two participants in 2013).

• Between 2010 and 2014, six participants from Spain attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• Spanish nominations cover two positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.28. Sweden

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Sweden2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Sweden is presented according to the following data:



• number of participants in the train-the-trainers’ sessions,

• number of participants in the train-the-trainers’ sessions by module,

• comparison between participation in the train-the-trainers’ sessions and delivery of the national training sessions (i.e. multiplier effect).

Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminSwedenfrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinSwedenbymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

97

207 219

638 740

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

250

196

78 72

40 38 35 247

0 0 0 0 00

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Incl

usio

n

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Excl

usio

n

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

End

of P

rote

ction


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinSwedenbymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromSwedenintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

0

100

200

300

600

500

400

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Incl

usio

n

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Inte

rvie

win

g Vu

lner

able

Pers

ons

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Excl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

End

of P

rote

ction

564

390

293

158127 121

85 8030 28 18 0 0 0


5

3

44

1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

5

4

3

2

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromSwedenintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromSwedenintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

10

20

50

40

3024 23

2

45

17

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010


Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction

1514 14

13

1110

9

76 6

2 2 2

00

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinSweden(2010‑2014)


Module


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Sweden



Sweden

Evidence Assessment





in T-t-T's sessions











Country of Origin

Information













in T-t-T's sessions




Persons




Common European

Asylum System











delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromSwedenintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 87 % of participants registered in national training by Sweden performed the task ‘Preparation and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 878 participants in national training in Sweden, including data regarding tasks performed- 57 national training sessions- Modules: International Refugee Law and Human Rights, Common European Asylum System, Dublin III Reg-

ulation, Inclusion, Exclusion, Interview Techniques, Interviewing Children, Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, Evidence Assessment

Section III, EASO Training and Experts Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbySweden

Modules ContentExperts TrainersInterview Techniques -- 1Evidence Assessment 1 4Inclusion 3 3Country of Origin Information -- 1Interviewing Vulnerable Persons 1 1Drafting and Decision Making 2 2Dublin Regulation 3 3International Refugee Law and Human Rights 1 3Gender 2 --Exclusion 1 1Module for Managers 2 2 Reception 2 -- Didactic trainers -- 2Total number of nominations 18 23

0%

25%

50%

75%


Unde

rtak

ing

of fi

rst f

act-

gath

erin

g in

terv

iew

s; re

gist

ratio

n; sc

reen

ing

and/

or re

ferr

al o

f inc

omin

g ca

ses

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

f asy

lum

inte

rvie

ws a

nd h

earin

gs

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g p

artic

ipati

on in

fact

find

ing

miss

ions

)

Anal

ysis

of fa

cts a

nd d

ocum

enta

tion

follo

win

g a

n as

ylum

inte

rvie

w

Draft

ing

and

prop

osal

of

asy

lum

dec

ision

s

Supe

rvisi

on/r

evie

w o

f o

ther

case

wor

kers

' a

sylu

m d

ecisi

ons

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or o

ther

case

wor

kers

' d

ecisi

ons a

t app

eal

Inve

stiga

tion

ofre

fuge

e fra

ud (c

ance

llatio

n p

roce

dure

s)

Draft

ing

and

supe

rvisi

on o

f the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

asy

lum

pro

cedu

ral g

uide

lines

Prod

uctio

n of

coun

try

repo

rts a

nd/o

rel

igib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

4%

87%

36%

45% 46%

86%

1%

86%

0% 0% 1%


Summary

• The trend in the implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Sweden has been increasing since 2010.

• In 2014 45 national training sessions have been organised in Sweden (+2 % compared to 2013) with 740 participants trained (+16 % compared to 2013).

• The Inclusion module ranked first in Sweden in 2014 (250 participants) followed by the Evidence Assessment module (196 participants) and the Interview Techniques module (78 participants).

• The Exclusion module has been used for the first time in Sweden in 2014.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 30 % of the Swedish participants in national sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum have been trained in the Inclusion module, 21 % in the Evidence Assessment module and 15 % in the International Refugee Law and Human Rights module.

• In 2014 17 participants completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions (-62 % compared to 2013). They have been trained to become national trainers in the following modules: Exclusion, Dublin III Regula-tion, Evidence Assessment, Interviewing Vulnerable Persons and Inclusion.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 111 Swedish participants attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Sweden can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü Evidence Assessment, with 15 participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and 26 national training sessions with 390 participants;


ü Interview Techniques, with 14 participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and eight national training sessions with 121 participants;

ü Drafting and Decision Making, with 13 participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and six national training sessions with 80 participants;

ü Country of Origin Information, with 11 participants trained in the train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and four national training sessions with 18 participants;

ü Dublin III Regulation, with 10 participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and six national training sessions with 85 participants;

ü Interviewing Children, with nine participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and 11 national training sessions with 159 participants;

ü Exclusion, with seven participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national train-ers and two national training sessions with 28 participants;

ü Interviewing Vulnerable Persons, with six participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and seven national training sessions with 127 participants;

ü Common European Asylum System, with six participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and three national training sessions with 30 participants;

ü International Refugee Law & Human Rights, with two participants trained in the train-the-train-ers’ sessions to become national trainers and 23 national training sessions with 293 participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that 87 % of the trainees are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection. In addition, 86 % of them supervise other case workers’ asylum decisions and/or invastigate refugee fraud.

• Experts and trainers nominated by Sweden cover 41 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.29. Switzerland

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:Switzerland2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Switzerland is presented according to the following data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminSwitzerlandfrom2010to2014 (participants+sessions)

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsinSwitzerlandbymodule(2014)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

0

63

12 5 6

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70



Num

ber o

f ses

sion

s

Num

ber o

f par

ticip

ants

6

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

3

4

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

End

of P

rote

ction

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Incl

usio

n

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Excl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsinSwitzerlandbymodule(2010‑2014)

Graph4:ParticipantsfromSwitzerlandintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

52

26

8

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000

10

20

30

40

50

60D

ublin

Reg

ulati

on

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

gVu

lner

able

Per

sons


CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

U

Asyl

um L

aw a

nd P

olic

y)

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

La

w a

nd H

uman

Rig

hts

End

of P

rote

ction

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

D

irecti

ve

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Excl

usio

n

2

1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000

1

2

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive


Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Incl

usio

n

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

dD

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rnati

onal

Refu

gee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Inte

rvie

win

gVu

lner

able

Per

sons

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent


Graph5:ParticipantsfromSwitzerlandintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromSwitzerlandintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)

2

13

3

0

3

0

5

10

15

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Participants in train-the-trainers's sessions by module (2010-2014)

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Evid

ence

Asse

ssm

ent

Inte

rvie

wTe

chni

ques

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rvie

win

gVu

lner

able

Per

sons

Dra

ftin

g an

dD

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

win

gCh

ildre

n

Com

mon

Eur

opea

nAs

ylum

Sys

tem

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

Refu

gee

Law

and

End

of P

rote

ction

7

3

2 2 2 2 2

1

0 0 0 0 0 0


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinSwitzerland(2010‑2014)


Module


Trainers' sessions


delivered in Switzerland


national training in Switzerland





Evidence Assessment




Country of Origin

Information


1 national training

delivered





delivered yet


Persons



delivered yet

Drafting and

Decision Making



delivered yet


in T-t-T's sessions


delivered yet



delivered yet




delivered yet


Rights



delivered yet




delivered yet

End of Protection



delivered yet

Common European

Asylum System



delivered yet

Module for Managers



delivered yet


Section II, Profile of participants from Switzerland in the EASO TrainingCurriculum

Reading example: 100 % of participants registered in national training by Switzerland performed the task ‘Prepa-ration and undertaking of asylum interviews and hearings’ as reported since July 2013.


Data Sample:

- Reporting period: July 2013 – December 2014- 6 participants in national training in Switzerland- 3 national training sessions- Modules: Dublin Regulation

Section III, EASO Training and Experts Pool: content experts and trainersnominatedbySwitzerland

Modules ContentExperts TrainersCountry of Origin Information 1 2 Total number of nominations 1 2

Tasks performed by participants in national trainings as reported since July 2013U

nder

taki

ng o

f firs

t fac

t-ga

ther

ing

inte

rvie

ws;

regi

stra

tion;

scr

eeni

ngan

d/or

refe

rral

of i

ncom

ing

case

s

Prep

arati

on a

nd u

nder

taki

ng o

fas

ylum

inte

rvie

ws

and

hear

ings

COI r

esea

rch

(incl

udin

g pa

rtici

patio

nin

fact

find

ing

mis

sion

s)

Anal

ysis

of f

acts

and

docu

men

tatio

nfo

llow

ing

an a

sylu

m in

terv

iew

Dra

ftin

g an

d pr

opos

al o

fas

ylum

dec

isio

ns

Supe

rvis

ion/

revi

ew o

f oth

erca

sew

orke

rs' a

sylu

m d

ecis

ions

Pres

enta

tion

and

defe

nse

of o

wn

or o

ther

cas

ewor

kers

'de

cisi

ons

at a

ppea

l

Inve

stiga

tion

of re

fuge

e fr

aud

(can

cella

tion

proc

edur

es)

Dra

ftin

g an

d su

perv

isio

nof

the

impl

emen

tatio

nof

asy

lum

pro

cedu

ral g

uide

lines

Prod

uctio

n of

cou

ntry

repo

rts

and/

or e

ligib

ility

gui

delin

es

Oth

ers

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

100%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

125%


Summary

• In 2014 a slight increase in the implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in Switzerland has been observed, with three national training sessions organised (+50 % compared to 2013) and six participants trained (+20 % compared to 2013).

• The Dublin III Regulation was the only module delivered in Switzerland in 2014.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 61 % of the participants from Switzerland in national sessions of the EASO Training Curriculum have been trained in the Dublin III Regulation module, 30 % in the Evidence Ass-sessment module and 9 % in the Interviewing Vulnerable Persons module.

• In 2014 three participants completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions (no participants in 2013). They have been trained to become national trainers in the Dublin III Regulation module and the Inclu-sion module.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 21 participants from Switzerland attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• The multiplier effect in Switzerland can be observed on the basis of the following modules:

ü Dublin III Regulation, with seven participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and nine national training sessions with 52 participants;

ü Evidence Assessment, with three participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and two national training sessions with 26 participants;

ü Country of Origin Information, with two participants trained in train-the-trainers’ sessions to become national trainers and one national training session with eight participants.

• In terms of the profile of participants in the EASO Training Curriculum, it is noted that all the trainees are responsible for interviewing applicants for international protection.

• Swiss nominations cover three positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.


4.30. UnitedKingdom

Section I, ProgressintheEASOTrainingCurriculum:UnitedKingdom2014

The implementation of the EASO Training Curriculum in the United Kingdom is presented according to the fol-lowing data:






Graph1:TrainingprogressintheEASOTrainingCurriculuminUnitedKingdomfrom2010to2014(participants+sessions)

No national training sessions in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in the United Kingdom since 2010.

Graph2:NationaltrainingsessionsintheUnitedKingdombymodule(2014)

No national training sessions in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in the United Kingdom in 2014.

Graph3:ParticipantsinnationaltrainingsessionsintheUnitedKingdombymodule(2010‑2014)

No national training sessions in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in the United Kingdom since 2010.


Graph4:ParticipantsfromtheUnitedKingdomintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2014)

Graph5:ParticipantsfromtheUnitedKingdomintrain‑the‑trainers’sessions(2010‑2014)

Graph6:ParticipantsfromtheUnitedKingdomintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionsbymodule(2010‑2014)


2

0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

2

1

Incl

usio

n

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Com

mon

Eur

opea

n A

sylu

m S

yste

m

Excl

usio

n

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Inte

rvie

win

g C

hild

ren

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Mod

ule

for

Man

ager

s

End

of P

rote

ction

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

20

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


0

2

4

8

66

1

2 2 2

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Participation in train-the-trainers's sessions by module (2010-2014)3

2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 0

1

2

3

Dub

lin R

egul

ation

Inte

rvie

win

g Ch

ildre

n

Incl

usio

n

Coun

try

of O

rigin

Info

rmati

on

Inte

rnati

onal

Ref

ugee

Law

and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Inte

rvie

w T

echn

ique

s

CEAS

(inc

ludi

ng E

U A

sylu

m L

aw a

nd P

olic

y)

Inte

rvie

win

g V

ulne

rabl

e Pe

rson

s

Asyl

um P

roce

dure

Dire

ctive

Evid

ence

Ass

essm

ent

Mod

ule

for M

anag

ers

Dra

ftin

g an

d D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Excl

usio

n

End

of P

rote

ction


Graph7:Multipliereffect‑Participationintrain‑the‑trainers’sessionscomparedtonationaltrainingdeliveredandnumberofparticipantstrainedinUnitedKingdom(2010‑2014)


Module Total of


Trainers' sessions


delivered in United

Kingdom



United Kingdom

Dublin Regulation



yet




yet



yet




yet

Evidence Assessment



yet


Persons



yet

Country of Origin

Information



yet


Rights



yet




yet

CEAS (EU Law and Policy)



yet


in T-t-T's sessions


yet




yet

End of protection



yet

Module for Managers



yet


Section II, ProfileofparticipantsfromtheUnitedKingdomintheEASOTrainingCurriculum

No data on the profile of participants from the United Kingdom has been collected during the sample period.

Section III,EASOTrainingandExpertsPool:ContentandExpertsnominatedbytheUnitedKingdom

Modules ContentExperts TrainersAsylum Procedures Directive 1 --Country of Origin Information 1 --Drafting and Decision Making 1 1Dublin Regulation 1 1Evidence Assessment 1 --End of Protection 1 1Gender 1 1Inclusion -- 1International Refugee Law and Human Rights 1 --Interview Techniques 1 1Interviewing Vulnerable Persons 1 1Total number of nominations 10 7

Summary

• No national training session in the EASO Training Curriculum has been organised in the United King-dom since 2010.

• In 2014 two participants completed EASO’s train-the-trainers’ sessions (stable compared to 2013). The participants were trained to become national trainers in the Dublin III Regulation module.

• Between 2010 and 2014, 13 participants from the United Kingdom attended train-the-trainers’ sessions.

• Experts and trainers nominated by the United Kingdom cover 17 positions in the EASO Training and Expert Pool.

HOW TO OBTAIN EU PUBLICATIONS

Free publications:

• one copy: via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu);

• more than one copy or posters/maps: from the European Union’s representations (http://ec.europa.eu/represent_en.htm); from the delegations in non-EU countries (http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/index_en.htm); by contacting the Europe Direct service (http://europa.eu/europedirect/index_en.htm) or calling 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (freephone number from anywhere in the EU) (*).(*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you).

Priced publications:

• via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu).

BZ-01-15-569-EN-N

ISBN 978-92-9243-502-8doi:10.2847/57349

Documents

EASO Annual Training Report 2014 · 2018-04-19 · EASO — ANNUAL TRAINING REPORT 2014 — 7 1. Progress in the implementation of the ... • In 2014 every trainer who completed