22
Earthquake Resistant Design of Tied-Back Retaining Structures Kevin McManus McManus Geotech

Earthquake Resistant Design of Tied-Back Retaining · PDF fileEarthquake Resistant Design of Tied-Back Retaining Structures Kevin McManus ... Trial designs tested using numerical,

  • Upload
    hakiet

  • View
    217

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Earthquake Resistant Design ofTied-Back Retaining Structures

Kevin McManus

McManus Geotech

Summary of Procedure

Calculate apparent earth pressure, p, using M-O value Kae instead of Ka

Use traditional apparent earth pressure diagram to size wall elements

Extend anchor free lengths to beyond slip plane defined by M-O equations

Perform stability checks using Kae and Kpe from M-O equation

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

Design PGA

Wall D

isp

lac

em

en

t (m

m)

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

Co

st

Ind

ex

Summary for 7 m walls (one row)

0.6 g

0.4 g

0.2 g

Soldier Piles

Anchors

Anchor Performance

-300

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

0 5 10 15 20 25

Time (s)

Wall

Cre

st

Dis

pla

cem

en

t (m

m)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

An

ch

or

Fo

rce (

KN

/m)

Wall Crest Displacement

Anchor Force

Conclusions

Design procedure based closely on existing, well proven, semi-empirical procedure

Trial designs tested using numerical, inelastic, time-history analyses with multiple EQ records up to 0.6 g

Designs found to be robust: All walls remained stable with anchor forces safely below UTS

Walls reached yield in extreme cases

Large permanent deformations in some cases

Conclusions (2)

Deformations reduced if wall designed to resist pseudo-static acceleration

Wall cost increases rapidly as design acceleration increases

Optimum probably about ½ PGA

ThankyouThis project was funded by EQC Research

Foundation under research grant 06/517

Special thanks to EQC for their continuing support for EQ engineering research in NZ

McManus Geotech

[email protected]