View
426
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dr. Maura Farrell NUI Galway
West Cork Development Partnership
Rural Development Conference
30th November
Personal Introduction
Rural Ireland – Spaces of Change
Shaping Intervention – via – DERREG Research
Key Research Outcomes – Relating to: ◦ Innovation◦ Resilience ◦ Community Spirit in Challenging Times
Lecturing
Undergraduate Agricultural Change andRural Development
Masters in Rural Sustainability
Research
PhD ResearchAgricultural Change andRural Sustainability
Most recent Research DERREG
Lecturer - Discipline of Geography, NUI Galway
Rural areas were always spaces of change
But..
Contemporary Rural Change is different and can be distinguished by two characteristics:
1. The pace and persistence of change Rural economy and society are changing constantly and
rapidly Driven by new technologies and social reform.
2. Totality and Interconnectivity of change Rural areas tightly interconnected by global social and
economic processes.
For Development Partnership to ‘Tap Into’Innovative Practices; witness Rural Resilience andCommunity Spirit they must:
Acknowledge Change
Embrace Variety
See Potential in Difference
Support Innovation
◦
Providing Examples of Good Practice
DERREG Research Project
Developing Europe’s Rural Regions in the Era of Globalisation:
An Interpretative Model for Better
Anticipating and Responding to Challenges for Regional
Development in an Evolving International Context
Seventh Framework Programme - Theme 8 – Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities - Project – 36 Months Duration – 7 partners
- Aberystwyth University (Lead Partner) (Wales)
- Geography Department, NUI, Galway
- Leibniz Institute for Regional Geography (Germany)
- Mendel University (Czech Republic)
- Institute NeVork, Slovenia
- Nordregio Centre for Spatial Development (Sweden)
- Saarland University (Germany)
- Ljubljana University (Slovenia)
- Wageningen University, The Netherlands
- Sweden
- West Of Ireland
- Lithuania
- Spain
- Slovenia-Goriska
- Slovenia-Pomurska
- Czech Republic
- Netherlands
- Germany-Dresden
- Germany-Saarland
Case Study Regions
1. Global Engagement and Local Embeddedness of Rural Businesses
2. Environmental Capital and Sustainable Rural Development
3. International Mobility and Migration of Rural Populations
4. Capacity Building, Governance and Knowledge Systems
5. Synthesis and Contextualisation of Research and Development of an Interpretative Model
Environmental Capital and Sustainable Rural
Development
- Central Objective
To examine the repositioning of forestry within the Border Midlands and West (BMW) Region of Ireland under influence from the interaction of global, regional and local environmental discourses, including the relative positioning of productivist forestry.
Primary production - no longer mainstay of rural areas (Woods, 2011).
Diversification – may ensure farm viability for farm family - but also huge advantage as a wider rural development initiative
Forestry as a diversification initiative - represents many functions:
◦ Product value◦ Amenity value ◦ Recreation ◦ Energy
EU Policy
EU Rural Development and Forestry Policy: forestry has a role in realising rural development objectives, promoting employment, improving well-being and the environment.
Competitiveness of agriculture and forestry is at the core of Axis 1 of the EU’s Rural Development Policy.
Irish Policy
Ireland - Policy document ‘Growing for the Future’ (1996) increase in forestry cover from 4.8% in 1993 to 17% by 2035. Currently 10%.
Afforestation Scheme - provides forestry grants and premiums – incentives to plant
Five Dimensions
1. Collection of Statistical Data
2. Documentary Analysis
3. Media Analysis
4. Individual Interviews - Key stakeholders
5. Identification of best practice examples of forestry initiatives
Forestry increasingly viewed as an important element of sustaining the rural, but considerable challenges, in particular, ‘buy in’ from farmers.
Nonetheless, - increase in farmer and non-farmer planting and a decline in state planting – from 4.8% in 1993 to 10%.
On-farm diversification relating to forestry was evident –
But…..
Little effect on wider rural development.
County Clare Wood Energy Project
Afforestation as a Rural Development Initiative
Example – County Clare Wood Energy Project.
Clare Local Development Company & Teagasc.
Created a commercially viable wood energy sector.
Thinning cluster; Supply chain and knowledge transfer and information staff.
Forestry is suitably placed to:
◦ Help maintain viable rural communities
◦ To stimulate rural development
◦ Provide alternative/additional rural activities for enterprise, employment etc.
◦ Afforestation is an effective farm diversification policy for the farming community,
however, ◦ without putting additional structures in place it is not effective as
a wider rural development initiative.
Capacity Building, Governance and Knowledge Systems
22
Considered the importance of governance arrangements to facilitate the development of grassroots initiatives at the regional and local level, particularly in answering the increasing challenges of globalizing forces.
Examples of specific interfaces/common boundaries
Illustrate diversity of arrangements and interfaces
Reveal extent of existing and potential learning and innovation capacity in a rural context
Highlight nature of blockages and constraints
Firstly - identified public strategies which support learning, innovation and capacity building in a rural and regional development context within the BMW Region
Secondly – carried out a review of the selected grassroots initiatives in terms of support of joint learning and innovation - focusing on support arrangements based on main criteria of initiation, expertise and facilitation, and finance.
10 initiatives selected – narrowed to 4 initiatives.
24
EUGovernment DepartmentsBMW Regional AssemblyLEADER
Education and Advisory function
Gleeson’s TownhouseAnd Artisan Foods
Roscommon HomeServices
Grassrootsdevelopment
initiatives
TeagascSt. Angela’s College
VECWDC
‘Public Administration’
Kilbride CommunityDevt Co-operative
Úna Bhán TourismCo-operative
Facilit
ation
of
learn
ing &
inno
vatio
nSupporting
policies
RIDC
Local development prioritised
West of Ireland – County Roscommon
FASPobal CEBRos. Co. Co.
Interfaces or Common Boundaries
25
Example 1: Local ‘agency’ collective interfacing
Example 2: Pobal;
Example 3: Gleeson’s Town House and Artisan Foods:
Local ‘Agency’ Collective Interfacing
• Strong inter-agency co-operation• Shared committee membership• A good overview of development needs - • Example: Training needs analysis of micro-
enterprises• Informal collaboration as effort to set locally-
relevant development agenda
• Constrained operational and funding remits (set at national level)
• ‘subcontractors’ of government? (Jones, 2001)
26
Pobal (Agency) Interfaces• Delivery agency for government NDP
programmes• Social inclusion/equality focus• Parameters clearly set• One-to-one project support via local
area case officer (CO)• Familiarity with project context• Nature of project/CO relations - Key
to maximising project benefits within set parameters
27
28
From 1996 - Townhouse, Restaurant 2007 - Artisan Food Shop - consolidating
locally-based food connection Place-based identity with high quality local
food production Informal networks with local producers
BMW Voucher Innovation Scheme (marketing local produce in shop)
RIDC’s “Roscommon Food Showcase” initiative –assistance with project planning
Gleeson’s as RIDC main promoters on this project
Catalyst for drawing in other producers
Membership of Good Food Ireland Network (i.e. accessing international network)
International (global) dimension essential to marketing
But, local agencies vital in consolidating local base
Direct forms of support and facilitation
None of the grassroots initiatives could operate without funding supports….
However, observed need for more flexibility in interpreting the way in which funding could be applied.
Certain conditions and parameters attaching to funding (driven by national imperatives) - can dilute core aims of initiatives – as they make decisions to ‘trade off’ between securing funding to keep them operating, or trying to go alone without support.
Level of paperwork and perceived ‘red-tape’ - applying for funding could be better streamlined - reflecting the voluntary nature of the initiatives.
Indirect forms of support and facilitation
Formal and informal networking - vital for exchange of information and developing systems of mutual support and facilitation.
For Example:
The on-going involvement of agencies - a core part of the value in this networking – they have ability to act as interface between initiatives and government (main provider of finance)
They are in the position to provide key information and advice on funding and other capacity-building opportunities such as training, or to guide initiatives in the case of major policy changes.
They provide more informal support through their ability to link initiatives with each other or with other agencies.
E.g. Agencies in County Roscommon - representatives on each other’s management boards - facilitates - on-going flow of information and knowledge
Linking initiatives and networking initiatives – hugely important
Achieved through representatives from organisations or initiatives occupying places on agency boards of management.
Links between the initiatives surveyed and third level institutes were almost non-existent.
Support from local communities for initiatives was regarded as an important dimension that would ultimately help to build capacity and ensure success.
However, it would appear that levels of local awareness and support varied and were not by any means assured. If there is not support and buy-in from the local community, then an important layer in the knowledge and capacity-building process is missing.
DERREG Project Research showed: Good Practice Example showed:
◦ Innovation◦ Resilience ◦ Community Spirit in Challenging Times
Significance of Rural Agencies as the interfacebetween RD initiatives/organisations andgovernment for the continued sustainability anddevelopment of rural spaces.
33
Thank You