EVALUATION PERSPECTIVES:LOGIC MODELS, IMPACTS AND

BUDGETING

2 0 1 1 S Y S T E M S S C I E N C EG R A N T S M A N S H I P W O R K S H O P

U S D A N AT I O N A L I N S T I T U T E O F F O O DA N D A G R I C U LT U R E

AU G U S T 9 , 2 0 1 1Dr. Gary J. SkolitsTiffany L. Smith

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation865-974-2777

gskolits@utk.edu

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 2

Evaluation Presentation Topics

1. Logic model basics2. Documenting project impacts 3. Evaluation do’s and don’ts4. Evaluation budgeting perspectives

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 3

1. Logic Model Basics

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 4

1. Logic Model Basics

A logic model is a visual depiction of how a project intervention is

expected to produce a desired outcome

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 5

General Logic of a Project

Social Need (Problem)

Project Intervention (Action)

Results (Change)

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 6

Logic Model Drivers

Needs Project Interventions Results

Needs Purpose Inputs

Outputs Outcomes

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 7

Logic Model Elements

A. Needs B. Purpose C. Inputs D. Outputs E. Outcomes

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 8

A. Needs

What problems deserve attention?

oAlways competing needsoSelect critical need to addressoDefine the need

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 9

B. Purpose

What do you seek to accomplish towards addressing this problem?

oSelect aspects of the problem to addressoDefine the specific purpose of your project

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 10

C. Inputs

What resources will you invest?oMoneyoPeopleoMaterialsoEquipmentoPartners

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 11

D. OutputsWhat will you do?

oServicesoTrainingoProducts

Whom will you reach?oClients (must define this group)oTypically multiple stakeholders

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 12

E. Outcomes

What results will you achieve?

Short-term (initial impact on participants)

Medium-term (ongoing impact on participants)

Long-term (impact on the problem)

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 13

2. Documenting Project Impacts

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 14

Outcomes – Short-Term

Feedback

Awareness

Commitment

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 15

Outcomes – Medium-Term

Knowledge/Skills

Disposition

Behavior

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 16

Outcomes - Long-Term

Achievement of project purpose

Favorable change in the initial need of concern

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 17

Impact: A Theory of Change Short -term: If participant reaction is positive,

then you theorize that participants are likely to learn desired knowledge, skills, and attitudes.

Medium-term: If participant learning/growth occurs (i.e., knowledge, skills, and dispositions), then you theorize that participants will change their behavior.

Long-term: If behavior changes, then you theorize that there will be a positive change in terms of the initial need.

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 18

Logic Model Template University of Wisconsin-Madison Extension

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 19

EVALUATION: check and verify

What do you want to know?

How will you know it?

PLANNING: start with the end in mind

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 20

3. Evaluation Do’s and Don’ts

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 21

A Few Evaluation Do’s Talk with colleagues sponsoring similar projects for

leads on good evaluators Engage an evaluator with a good reputation and

experience with your type of evaluation need Engage an evaluator early in project planning Understand the role of formative and summative

project evaluation Recognize the importance of efficient, reliable data

collection Build evaluation data collection into project

operations (when possible)

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 22

A Few Evaluation Dont’s Be intimidated by evaluation – it is

meant to enhance your project Fail to communicate with your evaluator

on a regularly scheduled basis Forget to address IRB concerns – protect

yourself and your clients/stakeholders Miss the opportunity to use project and

evaluation data to add to the literature in your field

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 23

4 . Evaluation Budgeting Perspectives

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 24

4. Budgeting for Evaluation

Some factors to considerEvaluation costs depend on the required effort of the evaluator

A general rule: 5% to 8% of project budget

Be prepared to negotiate with your evaluator to minimize evaluation costs

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 25

Budgeting for Evaluation

The more data project staff collect, the lower the evaluation costs. (However, some data should be collected by the evaluator.)

Link any proposed evaluation budget to specific evaluation plan and tasks.

Stay on top of the deliverables promised by your evaluator.

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 26

Two Key Resources

University of Wisconsin-Madison (Extension)http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html

Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Guide http://www.wkkf.org/knowledge-center/resources/2006/02/WK-Kellogg-Foundation-Logic-Model-Development-Guide.aspx

Institute for Assessment and Evaluation, University of Tennessee 27

Gary Skolits gskolits@utk.edu

865-974-2777

Institute for Assessment and EvaluationUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville

1122 Volunteer Boulevard; A503 Bailey Education ComplexKnoxville, TN 37996

http://web.utk.edu/~iae/