1
of the world—but these are also the big users of plastics. Production of polystyrene began just prior to World War II; pan creatic cancer has increased rapidly since that time. Not noted in your article is the fact that chemists, dry-cleaners, and han dlers of gasoline have a relatively high in cidence. These workers have in common the fact that they handle chemicals that are strong solvents for polystyrene and might drink beverages from plastic with fumes present or hands contaminated. Some coffee drinkers sense that the taste is perceptibly different from a plastic cup. If small amounts of the plastic do dissolve, a reaction might occur with some other agent (possibly chlorine) to produce a carcinogen. Worrisome is the fact that certain foods are known to be solvents for polystyrene, including citrus oils, butter, and coconut oil (an ingredient in some cof fee creamers!). Although only coffee has been singled out statistically, the class of people at special risk for pancreatic cancer may be—not coffee drinkers—but the ingesters of melted polystyrene. Shirley F. Hansen Administrative Officer Veterans Administration Medical Center Lake City, Florida Dr.BrianMacMahon'sReply: Following publication of our paper' re porting an association between coffee con sumption and pancreatic cancer, we received a good deal of helpful correspon dence suggesting underlying mechanisms. The leaching of polystyrene from dispos able cups suggested by Ms. Hansen was mentioned by a number of people, but by far the most frequently mentioned possible agents were pesticides contaminating im ported coffee beans. Other suggestions in cluded contamination of beans with antimony ore during shipping and a num ber of contaminants of the water used to brew coffee. Since there are also over I ,000 chemicals in coffee, including known mu tagens, there will be no shortage of hy potheses to be tested if the existence of the association is confirmed. Our own view, though, is that work to evaluate the asso ciation further is needed before we worry too much about possible mechanisms. Brian MacMahon, M.D. Professor Harvard School of Public Health Boston, Massachusetts Reference I. MacMahon B, Yen S, Trichopoulos D, et al: Coffee and cancer of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 304:630—633,1981. Retinoblastoma TotheEditor: In the article on retinoblastoma (Ca 32:130—140, 1982), Dr. Abramson states that it occurs in one in 18,000 to 30,000 live births. In your January/February sta tistics issue (Ca 32:30, 1982), the inci dence of retinoblastoma is indicated to be three per million children. There seems to be a discrepancy. Please explain. Marvin Shapiro, M.D. Encino, California Author's Reply: I chose to include the article from the Ar chives of Ophthalmology to reference the incidence of retinoblastoma, because it is the most recent reference on this subject, and I thought that readers could use this to find additional references they might like. Unfortunately, that article did not express the occurrence in terms of number of live births, and that is the discrepancy noted by Dr. Shapiro. I might point out that the SEER of the National Cancer Institute is very valuable, but for retinoblastoma, worthless. As can be seen in Ca, according to SEER's sta tistics, only 58 cases were seen in the coun VOL 32, NO 6 NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 1982 369

Dr. brian macmahon's reply: Pancreatic cancer and coffee

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

of the world—but these are also the bigusers of plastics. Production of polystyrenebegan just prior to World War II; pancreatic cancer has increased rapidly sincethat time. Not noted in your article is thefact that chemists, dry-cleaners, and handlers of gasoline have a relatively high incidence. These workers have in commonthe fact that they handle chemicals that arestrong solvents for polystyrene and mightdrink beverages from plastic with fumespresent or hands contaminated.

Some coffee drinkers sense that thetaste is perceptibly different from a plasticcup. If small amounts of the plastic dodissolve, a reaction might occur with someother agent (possibly chlorine) to producea carcinogen. Worrisome is the fact thatcertain foods are known to be solvents forpolystyrene, including citrus oils, butter,and coconut oil (an ingredient in some coffee creamers!). Although only coffee hasbeen singled out statistically, the class ofpeople at special risk for pancreatic cancermay be—not coffee drinkers—but theingesters of melted polystyrene.

Shirley F. HansenAdministrative OfficerVeterans Administration Medical CenterLake City, Florida

Dr.BrianMacMahon'sReply:

Following publication of our paper' reporting an association between coffee consumption and pancreatic cancer, wereceived a good deal of helpful correspondence suggesting underlying mechanisms.The leaching of polystyrene from disposable cups suggested by Ms. Hansen wasmentioned by a number of people, but byfar the most frequently mentioned possibleagents were pesticides contaminating imported coffee beans. Other suggestions included contamination of beans withantimony ore during shipping and a number of contaminants of the water used tobrew coffee. Since there are also over I ,000chemicals in coffee, including known mutagens, there will be no shortage of hypotheses to be tested if the existence of the

association is confirmed. Our own view,though, is that work to evaluate the association further is needed before we worrytoo much about possible mechanisms.

Brian MacMahon, M.D.ProfessorHarvard School of Public HealthBoston, Massachusetts

Reference

I. MacMahon B, Yen S, Trichopoulos D, etal: Coffee and cancer of the pancreas. N EnglJ Med 304:630—633,1981.

Retinoblastoma

To theEditor:

In the article on retinoblastoma (Ca32:130—140, 1982), Dr. Abramson statesthat it occurs in one in 18,000 to 30,000live births. In your January/February statistics issue (Ca 32:30, 1982), the incidence of retinoblastoma is indicated to bethree per million children.

There seems to be a discrepancy. Pleaseexplain.

Marvin Shapiro, M.D.Encino, California

Author'sReply:

I chose to include the article from the Archives of Ophthalmology to reference theincidence of retinoblastoma, because it isthe most recent reference on this subject,and I thought that readers could use this tofind additional references they might like.Unfortunately, that article did not expressthe occurrence in terms of number of livebirths, and that is the discrepancy notedby Dr. Shapiro.

I might point out that the SEER of theNational Cancer Institute is very valuable,but for retinoblastoma, worthless. As canbe seen in Ca, according to SEER's statistics, only 58 cases were seen in the coun

VOL 32, NO 6 NOVEMBER/DECEMBER1982 369