19
Dosimetry in Risk Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit Assessment and a bit More More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Dosimetry in Risk Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit Assessment and a bit

MoreMore

Mel AndersenMcKim Conference

QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk AssessmentJune 27-29, 2006

Page 2: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

OutlineOutline

Key components in toxicological Key components in toxicological evaluationsevaluations

Where are we likely to go with PK and PD Where are we likely to go with PK and PD models and how might SAR methods be models and how might SAR methods be helpfulhelpful

Hand-off to Greg LienHand-off to Greg Lien

Page 3: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Key Ideas in ToxicologyKey Ideas in ToxicologyCSU 2000CSU 2000

Mode of Action - more specifically Mode of Action - more specifically ‘Chemical Mode of Action’‘Chemical Mode of Action’

Target Tissue DosimetryTarget Tissue Dosimetry

Dose-Response/Risk AssessmentDose-Response/Risk Assessment

Page 4: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

What tools help us evaluate What tools help us evaluate these relationships?these relationships?

Pharmacokinetic models – calculate the tissue dose of active forms of the toxic chemical for various doses, dose-routes, and animal species

Pharmacodynamic models – calculate the degree of response for any level of tissue dose in different species for differing exposure scenarios

Page 5: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) ModelingPhysiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling

Define Realistic Model

Collect NeededData

Refine Model Structure

Make Predictions

Metabolic Constants

Tissue Solubility

Tissue Volumes

Blood and Air Flows

Experimental System

Model Equations

X

X

X

X

X

XX X

Tis

su

e C

on

cen

trati

on

Time

Liver

Fat

Body

Lung

Air

Page 6: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Using PBPK models – The Process 1987Using PBPK models – The Process 1987

Identify toxic effects in animals and people

Evaluate available data on mode(s) of action, metabolism, chemistry of compound, metabolites and related chemicals

Describe potential mode(s) of action

Propose relationship between response and tissue dose

Develop a PBPK model to calculate tissue doses

Estimate tissue dose during toxic exposures with PBPK model

Page 7: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Mode of ActionMode of Action

As in ‘Clue’, i.e., the butler in the As in ‘Clue’, i.e., the butler in the pantry using the pipe wrenchpantry using the pipe wrench

The reactive intermediate in the The reactive intermediate in the hepatocytes creating DNA-adductshepatocytes creating DNA-adducts

The estrogenic compound binding The estrogenic compound binding the ER in the uterus to enhance cell the ER in the uterus to enhance cell proliferation.proliferation.

Page 8: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Extrapolations supported by these modelsExtrapolations supported by these models

High doses to low doses

Dose route – inhalation, oral, dermal

Among species

Across classes of chemicals

Dosing scenarios

in vitro to in vivo

Page 9: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006
Page 10: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

McDougal et al., 1986. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.,85, 286-294.

Page 11: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Improving Use of Dosimetry for Improving Use of Dosimetry for Evaluating Health Evaluating Health

Risks-ILSI/HESIRisks-ILSI/HESI

“DOSIMETRY”

Quantitative PK MethodsQuantitative PK Methods

HUMANBIOMONITORING

TOXICITYTESTING

(std animal tstg)

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Research ElementsResearch ElementsSupporting Health Supporting Health

EvaluationsEvaluations

dc

a b

in vitro;MOA STUDIES

•Gene tox•Animal Alternatives

Page 12: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Coverage of Coverage of between 700 and between 700 and 900 papers. 900 papers.

Volatiles Persistent organics Drugs Inhaled Irritants Dioxin-like

Compounds Metals Siloxanes, etc.Get your copies at Get your copies at

Wiley web-site – Wiley web-site – hurry, don’t wait, they hurry, don’t wait, they are going fast.are going fast.

Page 13: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Develop parameter data bases for human Develop parameter data bases for human PBPK models including improvements in PBPK models including improvements in QSAR approaches parameter estimationQSAR approaches parameter estimation

Expand suite of ‘validated’ human PBPK Expand suite of ‘validated’ human PBPK models for biomonitoring research – models for biomonitoring research – human studies issues herehuman studies issues here

Extend quantiative approaches Extend quantiative approaches (experience) to study basic biological (experience) to study basic biological processes perturbed by chemical processes perturbed by chemical exposuresexposures

Dosimetry DirectionsDosimetry Directions

Page 14: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Exposure TissueDose

BiologicallyEffective Dose

EarlyResponses

LateResponses

Pathology

UNCERTAINTY

Exposure----Dose-----ResponseExposure----Dose-----ResponseCirca 1985Circa 1985

Page 15: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

SystemsInputs

‘Normal’BiologicalFunction

ImpairedFunction

Adaptation(Complex dose response

relationships – thresholds &Hormesis)

DiseaseMorbidity &

Mortality

Exposure

Tissue Dose

Biological interaction

Perturbation of Biological ProcessesPerturbation of Biological Processes

Page 16: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Conceptual Conceptual model for model for cellular toxicitycellular toxicity

Normal Epithelia

l Cell

Adaptive

State

StressedState

Pathology

Necrosis

Atrophy

DosimetryDosimetryInhaled Stressors

VentilationVentilation

Tissue Phase ReactionsCl2 HOCl + HCl

Developed for Diesel Exhaust Particle (DEP) toxicity – referred to as hierarchical oxidative stress (Andre Nel)

Page 17: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Use specific in vivo studies to develop a dose response model for activation of oxidative stress pathway following irritant exposures and differentiate dose regionsdifferentiate dose regions that activate adaptive processes from those associated with inflammation and apoptosis (high concentrations)

Normal Epithelia

l Cell

Adaptive

State

StressedState

Pathology

Necrosis

Atrophy

DosimetryDosimetryInhaled Irritant

(1) (2)(3)

Mechanistic Dose Response Models and Genomic DataMechanistic Dose Response Models and Genomic Data

Page 18: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Nrf2Maf

Nrf2-Maf

ARE(GR)

Nrf2-Maf-ARE(GR)

Φ

GRonGRoff GR mRNA

Φ Φ

GR

GCLonGCLoff GCL mRNA GCL

Φ Φ

Nrf2-Maf-ARE(GCL)ARE(GCL)

Nrf2-Maf

HO-1onHO-1off HO-1 mRNA

Φ Φ

Nrf2-Maf-ARE(HO-1)ARE(HO-1)

Nrf2-Maf

Catalase

H2O

O2

Cytosol

Peroxisome

Nucleus

GSH GSSG

GPx exportexport

GR

r-GC

GSGCL

NADP NADPH

G6PD

H2O

Nrf2

Nrf2-Keap1oNrf2-Keap1

Keap1oKeap1

Keap1oKeap1

Φ Φ

ΦSyn

HO-1

H2O2

H2O2

H2O2

H2O2

H2O2

+ +

A model for oxidative stress in Pathway Assist-A model for oxidative stress in Pathway Assist-automated model building and dose responseautomated model building and dose response

1001010.10.01

1

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0

dose

Response

Dose-Responses

HOClHOClandand

Nrf2 and Keap-1Nrf2 and Keap-1

Page 19: Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006

Focus on initial cellular responses and Focus on initial cellular responses and evaluate dose-response characteristics for evaluate dose-response characteristics for these initial events mechanistically….for these initial events mechanistically….for me these models focus on the chemical me these models focus on the chemical mode of action and accessible mode of action and accessible ‘quantitative biology’‘quantitative biology’

Develop data bases on cell response Develop data bases on cell response systems including dose response in a systems including dose response in a manner to enhance value for QSARmanner to enhance value for QSAR

Response Models Response Models DirectionsDirections