79
IN THE UM TED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:II-ZOIZB-CIV-SEITZ/SIM ONTON FILED by D.C. N2y 282212 STEVEN . M LARIMORE CLERK . U . s DlsT. cT. s. o. of FLA. - MIAMI TRALYN BUJDUVEANU, Plaintiff, V*. DISMAS CHARITIES, INCOANA GISPERT, DEREK THOM AS and ADAMS LESHOTA Defendants. / PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S STATEMENT OF DISPUTED FACTS IN RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT. DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'SSUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. .AND DEFENDANT'S AFFm AYID lN SVPPORT OFMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDUEMENT PlaintiffTRAIAN BUJDUVEANU, Pro-se, tilethisM otionptlrsuanttothisCourt Order (DE#124), under Federal Rulesof Civil Procedtlre56andlocal rule56.1. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffdoesnotcontestthefactthathedoesnothavehaveanyformerlegal training orbackground and he isinexperienced, even if thisCourt would likehim toperform asan attorneywithexperiencein theFederal Court, nordoeshehave thefinancialabilitytoaffordanattorney. Plaintiff askedthisCourt on morethan one occasion to appointan attorney. Howeverthedecision isdiscretionary in a civilcaseandthecourtisnotobligatedtoappointan attorney. Therefore, 1 Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 1 of 79

Doc.128

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Doc.128

IN THE UM TED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: II-ZOIZB-CIV-SEITZ/SIM ONTON

FILED by D.C.

N2y 2 8 2212

STEVEN .M LARIMORECLERK .U .s DlsT. cT.s. o. of FLA. - MIAMI

TRALYN BUJDUVEANU,

Plaintiff,

V*.

DISM AS CHARITIES, INCO ANA GISPERT,

DEREK THOM AS and ADAM S LESHOTA

Defendants./

PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S STATEM ENT OFDISPUTED FACTS IN RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S

SECOND AM ENDED M OTION FOR SUM M ARY JUDGEM ENT.DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEM ENTAL M OTION

FOR SUM M ARY JUDGM ENT. .AND DEFENDANT'S AFFm AYID lNSVPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDUEMENT

Plaintiff TRAIAN BUJDUVEANU, Pro-se, tile this M otion ptlrsuant to this Court

Order (DE# 124), under Federal Rules of Civil Procedtlre 56 and local rule 56.1.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff does not contestthe factthathe does not have have any former legal

training or background and he is inexperienced, even if this Court would like him

to perform as an attorney with experience in the Federal Court, nor does he have

the financial ability to afford an attorney. Plaintiff asked this Court on more than

one occasion to appoint an attorney. However the decision is discretionary in a

civil case and the court is not obligated to appoint an attorney. Therefore,

1

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 1 of 79

Page 2: Doc.128

throughout this case, the Plaintiff was left without proper justice. Evely time the

Plaintiff had to w rite a m otion, he did it to the best of his knowledge, w ith sim ple

words, and when he was sick he asked the help of people that had a little

knowledge about the law. (DE# 8, 13, 21,38)

It is true that the Plaintiff motion was inconsistent with the standards of the

Southern District Of Florida Federal Court, and at the same time with the

requirements set by the Judge. However the Plaintiff was very sick and he

responded the way he could at the time. Therefore, for what is worth. Plaintiff

will attempt to respond to the Defendants response, in his own simple words,

and the truth, because this is what it matters to the Plaintiff. THE TRUTH.

Until not very long ago, the Plaintiff believed that it is not possible for someone

to make so many false statements in a Federal Court. and get away with them.

However this case has prove him wrong. Yes it is possible to make false

statem ents in a Federal Court if the party that makes the statem ents is an entity

that makes $40,0 Million usd per year, from the government, and also makes

numerous unpublished and undocumented political contributions to various

politicians, and people that run for office. If this would have taken place in any

other countly of the world, the Defendan? would have been sent to the

International Tribunal, for crimes against humanity. Yet in this countly they get

away with those crimes simply because they have the money.

TRUE FACTS OF THIS CASE

1. Defendants start their m ost of their m otions with a statement in an attem pt to

discredit the Plaintiff, as a person that does not undersond well things or the

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 2 of 79

Page 3: Doc.128

Ianguage'. 'fDefendants.-.--.incorrectly identified as''.....

The Real name o Adams Lashanda is Lashonda Yvette Adam s, according to

Defendant's Attorney, and the real name of Defendant Derek Thomas is Derek

Lamar ThomasaDespite several request to the Defendants attorney, the real name

of the defendants has not been revealed in time. This action blocked the Plaintiff

from conducting any background check on the defendants, including criminal

background check. Defendants have a history of abuse of this kind, and also, for

some unknown reasons, are very much against Greek Orthodox Religion having

also a history of Court cases behind them, that show just how much they are

against Greek Orthodox Religion. In fact this is one of the many reasons that the

Plaintiff asked this court, in numerous occasions, to order a Federal Investigation

of Dism as Charities, lnc. How ever, his requests w ere ignored every tim e.

At the time of Mediation, the attorney has revealed the real names of the

Defendants with the statement '' what goes in Vegas, remains in Vegas'', meaning

that Plaintiff should not talk about this meeting to anyone, and at the same time

meaning a threat to the Plaintiff. It is not the first time that such behavior on the

part of the Defendants took place. (Exhibit 1)

Apart from this business card that the Defendants Attorney wrote by hand,

containing the real names of the defendants, and despite several request, the

name of the Insurance company that Mr. David Chaiet represents, which covers

the Defendants and Dismas Charities zlnc, was never revealed to the Plaintiff.

Perhaps this Court could guess w hy.

2. This Court has to will need to take a closer look at all the documents in this

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 3 of 79

Page 4: Doc.128

case, to see how the Defendants structure their false statements, so it could get

into their state of mind because this case, from the inception, has been nothing

but a bunch of lies, false and misleading statements.. Perhaps most of the

Plaintiff's motions are ''at best confusing'' as stated by judge Simonton, but not

confusing enough for this Court to reject all Plaintiff's claims against the

Defendants Criminal Activities which were done with a Criminal lntent.

3. Defendants repeat the fact that Plaintiff failed to appear at deposition and for

this alone, the case should be dismissed. The Plaintiffwas very sick, and at best

Defendants could have and should have addressed this Court, because that is the

legal entity to m ake a decision on such matters and not the Defendants. The truth

is that these are some of the Defendants subversive tactics to divert the attention

of this Court, and just by reading al1 the case, it can be seen that this is not the

first time that the defendants use those kind of tactics.

4. Beginning with the destruction of all security surveillance cameras, which was

admitted by the Defendants in the Plaintiff Request For Production Of All

Electronic Data and Documents, and continuing with destruction of all

docum entation and fabrication of new documents and evidence, Defendants will

continue to make false statem ents until the end of this case, even in the event

that documentation that proves the contrary exist, even from United States

Federal Agencies. How is it possible that this Court has admitted this up to now ?

There are documents within the United States Government and witnesses that

shows clear that the Defendants are lying to this Court, yet this Court continue to

protect the Defendants.

4

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 4 of 79

Page 5: Doc.128

5. Electronic surveillance dam, from surveillance cameras at Dismas Charities,

Inc, is stored on the hard drives of the com puters and will stay there indefinitely,

until someone will erase it. This data was deliberately erased from the hard

drives of the computers and this is what Defendants had to say about it: (Perhaps

they are considering al1 of us to be fouls) (Exhibit 2)

6. In their Statement of Disputed Facts Defendants states that '' Plaintiffcould

perform light duty work. However In her new Afsdavid Ana Ginspert adm its that

the Plaintiff is sick, as if she did not know before.Also Defendents admitted in

their Responses For ProducingAll Electronic Data and Documena that they

''new that the Plaintiff was sick, but they did how sick he was.'' (Exhibit 3)

6. Ana Ginspert is the Director of Dismas Charities,lnc., and everything that goes

on inside the Dismas House is reported immediately to her, even after hours. In

the same Af:david, Ana Ginspert states that Plaindff was fit to do light cleaning

and dusting. Light cleaning and dusting meaning in her words dragging a big

vacuum cleaner, removing the carpets, vacuum the floor, then take the big

garbage bags to the Garbage Container Iocated in the back yard of the property.

However, Defendants have failed to show what medical training or background,

Director Ginspert . Does M s. Ginsper know m ore than a Gastroenterologist or a

Hepatology Doctor ? Defendants had access to over 300 pages of medical

records, bearing the name of the Plaintiff, from the US department of Justice,

Bureau of Federal Prisons. Apart from that, the Defendants had access to

Plaintiff's medical records from Memorial Hospiol, Broward General Hospiol

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 5 of 79

Page 6: Doc.128

and a few doctors that the Plaintiff was seen. This would render DefendantAna

Gispert's statement as false, or this Court could say that it was just her personal

opinion. (DE# 126-2, 127)

Defendants asked that these charges against them will be dismissed by this

Court, and according to this Court decision, no right of the Plaintiff have been

violated.

7. If this Court will take the time to read the entire case, it will discover that

Defendants refused to admit the fact that the Plaintiff was sick. This is when

the Defendan? were holding the Plaintiffs medicines, and also they were

issuing passes for the Plaintiff to go to the hospital. The Plaintiff was taken his

medicines, every day including shots of insulin, right in front of the Defendants.

Yet on the response to the Plaintiffs request for production of documents and all

electronic data, the Defendan? responded; '' Defendant knew that the Plaintiff

was sick, but he did not know how sick he was.'' (Exhibit 3)

8. Plaintiffwas recommended for Hom e Consnement by CCM Director, Carlos

Rodriguez, on or about September 15, 2010, due to Plaintiffs Severe medical

condition and he was returned by US Marshal Agents, in the morning of October

20,2010,after he spend most of the night at Broward General Hospiol

Emergency Room for liver swallowing and abdomen pain. Plaintiff was picked up

by ambulance, from Dismas Charitiesylnc. facility on october 19, 2012, and it was

returned to Dismas House by one of Dismas House employees on October 20,

2012. Plaintiff was released from FDC Miami on January 03, 2011.As usual, Ana

Ginspert was informed by Derek Thomas, via telephone, at her home. (DE#125,

6

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 6 of 79

Page 7: Doc.128

Exhibit 3 and the attached Exhibit 4)

9. The refusal of the Plaintiff by the Defendants, to attend religious services at an

Orthodox church which was located outside the 5 miles area (6.7 miles) is not by

far the reason which the Defendants have stated. This matter was discussed

several times with all the Defendants. In fact if anyone conducts a background

check of these Defendants, it can be seen that they were involved before in other

court cases involWng the same things. Other residents in the Dismas house were

not treated the same way, being allowed to go to any religious institution they

prefer to go to. One other factor in this case is that one of the Clinics of Memorial

Hospiol, which the Plaintiff was attending almost in a daily basis and for which

Dismas house was issuing passes, was located right next to one of the Orthodox

Churches located in Pembroke Pines Blvd. Therefore the Plaintiff hopes that this

court can see the BIG LIE and stop protecting these criminals. After all. The

plaintiff desire was not so much to attend religious services, but rather to

socialize with other people. A human being does not have to go to a temple to

pray if he or she has the desire to do so. They could do it anywhere in their

privacy. (Exhibit 5)

10. On their Statement of Disputed Facts the Defendants have stated that the

''Plaintiff provided medical records and his work and conNnem ent were

according to his conditions.''

ALL Medical Records were provided to Dismas Charities halY ay house by the

Federal Bureau of Prisons. W ork record did not exist because while in the

custody of the United States Federal Bureau of Prisons the Plaintiffwas never

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 7 of 79

Page 8: Doc.128

allowed to work by the Federal Prison Doctors, Plaintiffbeing also a subject to

constant X-rays, CAT-SCANS, MRI, and other Medical test in order to stay current

with his medical condition which was aggravating and the United States

Government did not want to have anything to do with this issue. One must have a

clear mind and look at the Plaintifrs past- Of course, the Defendants could lie, but

the US Governm ent and all these docum ents are there for anyone to look at.

11 Driving without an approval represents a minor Violation and should be dealt

with in the house, without any outside involvement, which in fact it was, even

none of the rules were respected. Defendants had all the documents, for

sometime, including registration, current insurance, and even the court

documents showing entire driving record of the Plaintift giving the impression

that Plaintiff is ok.

The fact that they have conducted an illegal search in the car and found a cell

phone, of which the Plaintiffhad no idea that it exist, has nothing to do with the

Plaintiff. At no time, during his residence at Dismas house, the Plaintiffhad the

intention to introduce any phone cell inside the Dismas House. The Plaintiff is a

mature person and it would not risk a return to federal prison for a cell phone.

The Plaintiff speaks several foreign languages fluently, has been traveling in his

life to many foreign countries and his has been engaged in matters on behalf of

the US Government, that Defendants have never even seen in the modes. W ould

this Court believe that he w ould risk his Iife for a Cell phone ?

12. On the night of October 19, 2010 when the plaintiff was picked up by

ambulance from Dismas Charities, Inc., he became a LIABILIW . Not only that the

8

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 8 of 79

Page 9: Doc.128

Plaintiff was not paying any money to Dismas House, due to the fact that he was

not em ployed, now Dismas Charities had to pay for ambulance services which

were quiet expensive. A decision to declare the Plaintiff a fugitive and thus unfit

for halfway house residence, would be better that paying his medical expenses.,

and also get rid of a problem.This is a corporation made by criminals and run by

criminals. There is so little this court knows about this corporation. (Exhibit 6)

13. The The United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons did

not return the prisoner to Miami FDC. Defendants have declared the Plaintiffa

fugitive, while the Plaintiff was sleeping in his quarters at Dismas house. This

m atter can be easily investigated by this Court.

The docum ent shown by the defendants is a false document. It does not contain a

date, signature of the CCM Director or any other indication of Federal Bureau of

Prisons. Attached for the convenience of this court are the correct teletype forms

that should be sent by the CCM Director. Also a copy should be given to the

Plaintiff. Such forms did not exist, because the Director of the CCM was not even

aware of this event. Also entries I the SENTRY SYSTEM should be made

constantly by the CCM and the US Marshal. Such entries do not exist in the Final

Sentry Report, because this is another Gross Lie of the Defendants. ( Exhibit 7)

14. By law, every disciplinary action taken by the Federal Government

employees, must be entered into the Sentry System. An example of a disciplinary

Report of a disciplinaly Comiteee by the Federal Bureau of prison is attached, as

an exhibit, for this Court ,and it represent a violation of the Plaintiff, of being

insolent to the staff members, at Colman-Low Federal Prison. (meaning here that

9

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 9 of 79

Page 10: Doc.128

he was not listening while the staff was talking to him). The punishment

consisted of taking away True link Services (Email) for two month is included in

the report (Exhibit 8)

15. Defendants alleges that ffplaintiff was transferred by the Bureau of Prisons

into the custody of FDC Miami, where a subsequent hearing was held by the

bureau of prisons concerning his possession of a cell phone and driving a vehicle

without authorization. He was found guilty of these offenses at the hearining and

required to selve.....''

Following the incidents and realizing their mistakes, the defendants sended in

two occasions 6 employees of Dismas Charities, Inc, in a desperate attempt to

cover up this incident They are on the daobase of the FDC Miami SuN eillance

cameras and unlike the evidence thatwas deliberately destroyed by Dismas

Staff, this data will be kept by the Federal Government for 60 years.

16. Defendants wanted to conduct a hearing inside of a Federal Building butthey

are not allow ed by law because they are civilian employees and not federal

employees. All document and form s which were m ade in many days, were signed

by Galo Rugel calling himself the chairperson, and the others, which are civilian

employees of Dismas Charities,lnc. like many other things that that they were not

aware of any hearing held by US Government employees MUST be entered in the

SENTRY SYSTEM. The Plaintiff attaches the hnal Sentry report for this court

convenience, to show that there is no sign or clue of such entry. Defendants

ignored the fact that it is a criminal act to manufacture false evidence and/or US

10

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 10 of 79

Page 11: Doc.128

Government documena. Despite all this, the court ignored the whole issue. (DE#

83-2, Exhibit 11 and also Attached Exhibit 9)

17. Following this incident, most of these employees along with Lashonda

Adams, Derek Thomas, Jerry L. Eduards and others have been fired in order to

cover-up the events in this case. This Court has to think as per why a Corporation

would fire all these employees after so manyyears of work there. The real names

of these criminals will never be known as they have vanished away, thanks to

their Attorney, Mr. David S. Chaiet One must imagine why would a corporation

fire so many employees at one time, considering the fact that some of them have

been with Dismas house for sometime.

18. 11. The CCM shall ensure that each provider of home confinement services

develops a system for handling violations of program rules which meets the ''due

process'' criteria of W olff v. McDonnell (United States Department of Justice,

Federal Bureau of Prisons Statement 7320.01 6, 1995).

19. W hen a prisoner on transitional control status is believed to have violated

any major rule or condition of transitional control or major rule of the licensed

facility, which may warrant the revocation of transitional control release, the

supervising U. S. Probation Officer (USPO) shall be informed of the violation by

the facility as soon as possible, but no later than the next business day following

the violation. Plaintiffs probation ofscer Steven Aasterud and the US Probation

Office found out about Plaintiff's incarceration in January 2011, when the

Plaintiff has told them. There is no document that or entry in the Sentry system

that the Probation Office was advised. For that matter to be cleared up, Mr.

11

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 11 of 79

Page 12: Doc.128

Steven Aaasterud can be called by this Court to testify of that fact The question is

of this Court wants the truth or if it wants to continue the cover-up of these

crim inal acts of the Defendants.

20. there are many documents and witnesses to this case, but what good would it

serve when the court has already taken its side.

CONCLUSION

Plaintiff has requested this Court, on more than one occasion, that an

investigation of Dismas Charities, Inc. halfway houses, be carried by an

investigation team . However all his reques? were ignored by this Court. For

some unknown reasons, this Court has taken side so far with the defendants.

Such illegal activities cannot be allowed by a Federal Court, as these deliberate

criminal actions of the Defendants are threat to the Democracy of this country.

If we do, then perhaps we can take the Constim tion, tear it down, and flush it

dow n the toilet.

This Court should analize if the main priority of the court is the style in which a

case is conducted, or if the the THRUTH and JUSTICE are more important,

because if the this Court is concerned with THE TRUTH, then all the truth is

documented and it is written in black in white on the attached documents.

Therefore there are not to many legal arguments that can be made on this case

and the case should be judged on the facts.

Plaintiff is asking this Court again to read the entire case, and then order an

investigation of alI crim inal activities of Dismas Charitieszlnc. This corporation

was established by the real criminals of United States, and it is still run by the

criminals today. W hat better way to steal money from the United States

12

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 12 of 79

Page 13: Doc.128

Government and its tax payers that hiding behind a religious shield ?

Dated: November 26, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

M r/ 4// Jz 2 47TM IAN BUJDW E , PRO SE

5601 W . Broward Blvd.Plantation, FL 33317

Te1: (954) 663-7768

13

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 13 of 79

Page 14: Doc.128

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

l hereby certify that on or about OCTOBER 10, 2012 a true and correct copy of the

foregoing document was served upon the following via the United States Posll

Service,First Class M ail:

Dismas Charities,lnc.

14l N .W . 1 St. Avenue

Dania, FL 33004---2835

Ana Gispert

Dism as Charities,lnc.14l N.W . 1 St. Avenue

Dania, FL 33004---2835

Derek Thomas

Dismas Charitiesylnc.

141 N .W . 1 St. AvenueDania, FL 33004-2835

Lashanda Adams

Dismas Charities,lnc.141 N .W . 1 St. Avenue

Dania ,FL 33004--2835

David S. ChaietEsquire

4000 Hollywood Boulevaxd Suite 265South Hollywood, FL 33021

EXECUTED ON THIS 26th DAY 0F NOVEM BER, 2012

, /r

/ &///Z y- zzz 21TRM AN BUJDUVE ,U PR0 SE5601 W . BROW ARD BLVD.,

PLANTATION, FL 33317

TEL: (954) 663-7768

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 14 of 79

Page 15: Doc.128

EXH IBIT 1

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 15 of 79

Page 16: Doc.128

- Full name / identification of the three defendants wasreceived from David S. Chaiet on 11/01/2011.

- No other requested inform ation regarding the Defendants

was ever received.

***llandw riting can be verified and authenticated.

. Skowu I':c.Y/ AköwoXx'

Lvrk 1 - XV- .,yy

y y y y gykq:t tv

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 16 of 79

Page 17: Doc.128

Windops Live Hotmail Print Message

Defendants true indéntiti

28/09/2011 17:02

Traian Bujduveanu (orionav@msn,com)Wed 9/21/11 9:50 AM

David Chaiet ([email protected])

Dear Mr. Chaiet,

Please be kind and reveal the true identity of the Defendants, and in particular that of one of the Defendants

that goes by the following names: Leshota Adams, Lashonda Adams and Lashanda Adams.I very much dislike to be rude, but I need the real identities of the defendants.

Best Regards

Traian Bujduveanu

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 17 of 79

Page 18: Doc.128

Windqws Live Hotmail Print Message

Defendants Identitiés

2 8 / 09 / 2 0 1 1 1 7 : O 1

Traian Bujduveanu (orionav@msnxcom)

Fri 9/23/11 4:52 PM

David Chaiet ([email protected])

Dear Mr. Chaiet,Please be kind and provide full name of each Defendant, including the middle name, if any.

Best Regards

Traian Bujduveanu

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 18 of 79

Page 19: Doc.128

WindoFs Live Hotmail Print Message

RE: Defendants true'indéntity

28/09/2011 17:02

David Chaiet ([email protected])Wed 9/21/11 10:06 AM

Traian Bujduveanu ([email protected])

Lashonda Adams

lt was ''zrevealed'' in her interrogatory responses and her signature Iine.

You were the one w ho got her nam e wrong. No one is concealing their identity.

From: Traian Bujduveanu (mailto:[email protected]: W ednesday, September 21, 2011 9:50 AM

To: David Chaiet

Subjeu: Defendants true indentity

Dear Mr. Chaiet,

Please be kind and reveal the true identity of the Defendants, and in particular that of one of the Defendantsthat goes by the following names: Leshota Adams, Lashonda Adams and Lashanda Adams.

I very much dislike to be rude, but I need the real identities of the defendants.

Best Regards

Traian Bujduveanu

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 19 of 79

Page 20: Doc.128

Windows Live Hotmail Print Message

I 6

RE: Defendants true indentity

28/09/2011 17:01

Traian Bujduveanu ([email protected])Wed 9/21/11 10:37 AM

David Chaiet (dchaiet@eisingerlawacom)

I understand Mr. Chaiet. I was the one ''who got her name wrong'', and for the Iast 9 (nine) month her realname and identity could not be reveal.

With aII due resped Mr.chaiet, the interrogatories (question 1) reveal an objedion to that question, and nother real name, and you use her name, in the same interrogatories, as Lashanda Adams.

Her signature Mr. Chaiet, reveals something other that her real identity.

Mr. Chaiet, it took me nine moth to find out her alleged true name. Just make sure Mr. Chaiet that they aretelling w u the truth.

Best Regards

Traian Bujduveanu

From: [email protected]: [email protected]: RE: Defendants true indentityDate: W ed, 21 Sep 2011 14:06:37 +0000

Lashonda Adams

lt was ''revealed'' in her interrogatow responses and her signature Iine.

You were the one w ho got her name wrong. No one is concealing their identity.

From : Traian Bujduveanu Emailto:[email protected])Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 9:50 AM

To: David Chaiet

Subjeu: Defendants true indentity

Dear Mr. Chaiet,

Please be kind and reveal the true identity of the Defendan/, and in particular that of one of the Defendants

that goes by the following names: Leshota Adams, Lashonda Adams and Lashanda Adams.

I very much dislike to be rude, but I need the real identities of the defendants,

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 20 of 79

Page 21: Doc.128

Windows Live Hotmail Print Message

RE: Check for copies' of biscovery documents

2 8 / 09 / 2 0 11 1 7: 10

David Chaiet ([email protected])

Wed 9/14/11 4:42 PM

Traian Bujduveanu ([email protected])

W hen I get it, you will be sent the records. I would suggest you withdraw the motions to compel as I will

be filing a brief in response along with a motion for sanctions.

From: Traian Bujduveanu gmailto:orionav@msn,com)Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 4:38 PM

To: David Chaiet

Subjeu: Check for copies of Discovery documents

Dear Mr. Chaiet,

As per our previous agreement, I am send you a check for $30.00 (thirty) to cover the copies and mailing ofthe Discovery documents.

Best Regards

Traian Bujduveanu

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 21 of 79

Page 22: Doc.128

' kWindqFs Live Hotmail Print Message 28/09/2011 l 7:04

answered.

These are some of the documents and things that I need in order to put a case together:

1. Complete copies of the first two shots issued by Derek Thomas to me, Before the Greatest Violation Offense

shot 108. (that includes the shot that I have allegedly refused to sign)

2. I would Iike the defendants to answer the questions regarding jobs held in the past 10 years.

3. Answer if they have been arrested before and if they have any criminal record.

4. Answer if they have ever been involved in lawsuit before and in what capacity.

Mr. Chaiet, you have asked me these questions in your request and I did not have any objedions.

When I asked the Defendants the same questions, the subject becomed immediately an issue of harassment.

Apparently Mr. Chaiet, there are many things that the Defendants did not tell you.

Mr. Chaiet, please be kind and understand that I need these information and more, in order to put a case

together, and that the time for discovery is running short.

If you and the Defendants continue at this rate, 1 have no choice but ti file a Motion For Summary Judgment.

Best Regards

Traian Bujduveanu

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 22 of 79

Page 23: Doc.128

N .*

EXH IBIT 2

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 23 of 79

Page 24: Doc.128

W M TM TM STATES DTO TW COURTFORH SOIIM NDBTRICTOFR ORD A

CASENO.: IIJO12O.CIW SO SIMONTON

TRAM BUD UVBAX .

Pl<

VS.

olsMxsco N .c A> GISPSRT,DE- THOMAS- ADAMSLESHOTA

Defe- ./

NM . CE OF O G ANRW RRA TO PT.ATNY S O T SET OFM Y OGATOO PRON O EDTODKRXKTHOM AS

Defendan: Derek n nmnq. by Od e + unde - co=sek sles An= to

Plaîne s FH Setoflnte= gatodespu- motto theFM - lkulo of CM I Prn- dure.

CIRM CAR OF O W CE

I M PRRY œ TA zu ontY dayofs- - xzoll O fomgoing d0= * 1is bdng eee G1s day On a11 colmsd M OM or 7r0 R PM iœ ie M ed ön the A hed

Servke List ZAUM W M RG

DAVD S. T.ESQUIREF1oddaB= No.963798

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 24 of 79

Page 25: Doc.128

None.

@. lnddentreportwn-' byDc kn omo = Oc*bœ l3y 2010.

9. n e pree e Y e = v-'llnnce ca = . n e rx - m = mon*' ne by se n e lapes A m f

4.

œee eoftbaee occ- - donotexist

l0. Dlqmxm has IM M mMlo-l = * of tbe P1%11#1& wMch are avœ ie for > on at il

cotmsel's oœ cm

l 1. No-

12. Yes. Howevcx 1 coGd not qom l oe Woladons gfrulo by * Plm'odœ1

l3. n e PI>'*'*was e orded O - M-NI- G n- M Y = mq.*x*M W himy hcluding Jj

.--

ov ' wsio to oe hoxs-' 1 - home conrmem- '

14. On October 13, 2010s the Ple tie vinloTM le mlœ of 131- - . On Ocobœ 19y 2010. Derek ;1

j .;' j TNomas was mxa- awa * ie Plaino was tr- o>i to the hospiY but was n@t awr of j

*lemedY cone ontb< r-e lr- ML -=--a

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 25 of 79

Page 26: Doc.128

1.

AWSW RQA

DI= MVM' ' c lx œ W h IW Y O M- H X XMWMY. W PW R

djV o > %* x & uav-e * j m- % .*% G .D% C% . % n enamx

of Ox oœc= aod a* u - e o- 1 > * 1y Y c* Y le > *

djxo> of *W-v** 1e-** G 11>* e oe H e de .

Oxeœom n e = > e lie ol>.'me b ov- v - nol v Yly

* 1- o lead Y *e di= vc of > '-'h1* evld=x Subj- o e e out we tb*

fore e e 'n-z a'*- . â not a- of - de ae Y O x = fe in *

3. n eple - e e an- hlee - e a e e - e

.W * * *! u1- e w w am - ' w hy e w > e4. TM pe > œ- =

W - umee- aae- o= -o- -5. ON< ' Ysqe 1 -'= -=h - e b> M - a >'' ' l- = i- me

e nu e e ao k

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 26 of 79

Page 27: Doc.128

EXH IBIT 3

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 27 of 79

Page 28: Doc.128

* ** @# *

,* *

.. - ..- .- . - .- - - - ..- ...- - - - - .--- -- - .-- - -- - - -

o. .j.&M- A. S-.c-y I-A-R-I''T'' -I-E-S-, IN C- .----- -'-'- -'--' '-- ''--' -''--' - ' ' '' --j )

'

*

August l 0, 20 1 0

Carlos E. RodrigueA CM

Federal Bureau of Prisons40l North M iami AvenueM iami, Florida 33 128

QE: Employm ent W aiver

Bujduveanu, Traian80655-004

Dear Mr. Rodrigtjez.

Mr. Btljdtlveanu is a Gfty six year old who arrived at Dismas Charities on 07-28-1 0. He isscheduled to be released on 01 -03- 1 1 . Mr. Bujduveantl has several chronic medical conditions forwhich he is tak en several medications. Mr. Btljduveantl stlffers from Chronic Hepatitis C.Hypertension- Cirrhosis ot- Liver. Diabetes Mellittls Type 2. Hyperlipidemia. andThrombocylopenia. At this time, I am reqtlesting that his employment requirement be waived.

Thank you in advance and if you need any further informations please feel free to contact me at

(954) 920-6558.

S incerely.

Lashonda Adams

Cotynselor

z)u .

' Dere '' Thomas N

Assista 'rector

- Approve : 'sapprove :Date.

CCM Signature'.

l 4 l N. V./* 1 S T hhl F Nl l J IE * D A ) v; 1 A B E 1..%% . ( J ' H . F f!..- 3 3 (J t . ) .4 7 ( -) F F I ( ' .' -F ( 9 5 4 ) t ) ? ( ) - 6 5 5 S * F .% N, x- t 9 5 .1 1 9 2 t ) - r:i -i i. ti 6

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 28 of 79

Page 29: Doc.128

Dismc Charifes - Freshstart

> *

:z.: DISMAS HARITIES42 (-b-j -'fQ4 Home search n sks Repo- Administration'x -w.-l1 Nkt:-ee )C:115!/

Traian Bujduveanu AcmoN RsouEs'r Duxl-s

Acmos RzoussTsNoa s Staf gispert ana

CASECUENT lNFo Client Bujduveanu, Traian

cl-lexT' STAV INFO Number 3900

cosm o'rs Requested 10/19/2010 12:24 PMCUIENT n sKs Date

Dlscs/moe Status completedDRM NG INFO n is Iettem is to advise you' that l experience paln and disconfort in myEMPLOYMENT Iiver. This is due to being upset and harrassed for the Iast weekby Mr.EMPLOYMENT SCHEDULE Thomas and his Staf members. Please be kind and advise Mr. n omasFlxso MoveuEv s Reason to refrain from upseting me due to my medio l condi:onsyand the

dammage it can be done to my fragile Iiver. l H nkly believe this coniid

HoMs coNF. jt js attemy- to behas escalated from nothing to a Personal Level andMovsrzsN'r REouss'rs resojved jn a vindictive way by Mr. n omas. Best Regards Tralan

oFsesses BujduveanuOPEN MOVEMENTS Previous I do hope that you feel better. l will speak to Mr n omas regardlng thisPAYMENTS Responses situation since as you know 1 have been otzt of town sinœ 10/14/10./ Ana

PRooM us fispertgîspeft ana 40/19a010 5:31:00 PM

REQUfRED CHEGKS .Response

STATUS HISTORY

Stlssl:TeNc:

SUMMARY

Save Reset Cancel Reassign

,-.=. ltA--z- -a-go-m-oouq+oem oela-ntnehoa,4laq/anuanaeoyzecq/AcéonReauese etnils.e ... 9/7/20 1 1

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 29 of 79

Page 30: Doc.128

W M TM TEDSTATES DTO TCTCOURTFOR

XG SOIIM N DBTRICTOFFLORD A

CASE NO.: II-ZO12O-CIW SM W SIMONTON

TRM AN BUD a

PW MW >

VS.

DISM M ARSTG lyc ANA GISFERT.psRsKTHoe - wolMscssHou

Defe lntm./

NX G CE oF FR - G ANR- R To PT.AO S O T SET 51

M O QOGATOO PROPOO D TO DO RY TEOMA:

Defendant Dexk Tbomu by Md lko+ unde - cotmsek 51es

Plaine s FH Set of Int= ogatofes p'x ontto the FG - IRUI. of CM I Pm xdce.

CERM CATE OF SKRW CE

Vday of S ept=bœx 2 0 1 1 Vf or oa

ings yarengI >pRny GRTA 1* on tlais Yeing so ed 10 day on a; eolmsd = oM or pm > pe e h

SerdceLix viaunie sa ke xlsr .

DAVD S. T ESQYFloh-svxo. 963-1

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 30 of 79

Page 31: Doc.128

None.

:. Jncid= tzeportwn-' byDc kn omxm on Ocobc 13.2010.

u.

*

9. V e g= ises have = -*11.- - cam- n e Mm- e a mnne' ne by M Tàe op> 1om i

1.

Ge e e of 1% G + oce- - -q do nolexist

l 0. Dismas 11* llnWted medical = o* of 1% Plslnfle wMch are available for > on al its

colmAel's oœ x

No.

l 2. Y> . Howevœ. f could not co- l ie Woladons ofm lœ by * P1=' 11e3

'nwW was e nMM V - *nnable and uec- meH = > u- M by <' incle g i

l 3- n e P1m 1

#

l

- viiutolhehospiY e homecon- G

14. On October 13. 2010. the Plme 'f Wolae le * of nlqm-. On Ocobœ 19x 2010. Derek ;

l .y

-

'lRmmae was mM - awa * le Plaino was d to th* hoeiY but was net awr of k

.UT> ' . z*--'-1 j ' . . . . . ;

' lemedY condie ae - v- lr- AnLl .

' m. . ..... : . ... ...... - - .. ..

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 31 of 79

Page 32: Doc.128

Dismas Chsrities - FreshstM

.* *

.

..*.. DISMAS HARITIES

.,:J.

) fi'p' u',b Home searc: Tasks Repo- Administration'w 'Nw

Traian Bujduveanu AcnoN Rcoues'r DETAILSAcnoN ReouBsTsCASE NoTEs Yta' gispert, ana

CLIENT INFO Client Bujduveanu, TraiancueNr sAwv INFO Number 3563

coNm cTs Requested 9/1/2010 10:44 AMcueNT n sKs Date

DISCHARGE Status CompletedDRMNG INFO Dear Mr. Gispert Thank you again for your response. l strongly believeEMPLOYMENT that a good way to clarify my status regarding Medical Conditions forEMPLOYMENT ScHeouue which I was diagnosed,is to have a conveme on with one of the doctorsFIXED MovEMsNrs Reason that have ase n me at Memorial Hospital Clinic.request aIl Medical

Records from memorial Hospital and from Bop,wh'lch are quiet

HoMe CoNF. extensive,by the way. This will help to eliminate anydoubts regardin

MovsMEN'r REouesTs Medical conditions refered to. Best Regards Traian BujduveanuOFFENSES previous I believe we have set a meeting for today at 3:00pm. If any further info is

OpEN MOVEMENTS Responses needed we will advise you. Thank you./ Ana gisped

PAYMSNTS Qispert ana gm m n 2:44:* PM

PROGRAMS Response

REQUIRED CHECKS

Svv us HlsToRg

SuBslsTENcESUMMARY

Save Reset Cancel Reassign

h- '//lnnln-qewermreshsG esidentschedleWAcfoG equesl/AcéonRequeADeY ls.asp... 9/7/201 1

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 32 of 79

Page 33: Doc.128

l'age 1 01 1Dismr Chmities - Freshstart

# +

:z.: D lsMAs HARITIES/7) 'ri'-) .L.+- Home searcb nsks Reports Administrationkx . kuww xe>' -

Traian BujduveanuAcnoN REQeESTS ACTION REQUEST DETAILS

cAsE NoTss Sta' gispert, ana

CuEN'r INFo Client Bujduveanu, TraiancueN; STAY INFO Number 3900

coNmAc'rs Requested 10/19/2010 12:24 PMCLIENT n sKs Date

DlscaAaGE Status completedDRM NG INFO n js jetterr js to advise you' that I experience pain and diqrnnfod in myEMPLOYMENT Iiver. This is due to being upset and harrassed for the Iast weekby Mr.EMPLOYMENT SCHEDULS Thomas and his Sta# members. Please be kind and advise Mr. ThomasFlxEo MoveMev s Reason to refrain from upseting me due to my medical conditions,and the

dammage it can be done to my a gile Iiver. l ffankly believe this coniid

HoMs coNr. has esOlated from nothing to a Personal Level and it is attemqted to beMovsMsN'r ReouesTs resojved in a vindictive way by Mr. Thomas. Best Regards Tralan

OFFENSES BujduveanuOPEN MOVEMBNTS Previous l do hope that you feel better. I will speak to Mr Thomas regarding thisPAYMENTS Responses situation since as you know I have been out of town since 10/14/10./ Ana

PRoolte s gispertgispert, ana 1(g19J2010 5231:00 PM

REQUIRED CHECKS Response

S'rv us HISTORY

SUBSISTENCE

SUMMARY

Save Reset Cancel Reassign

,...- - lla--z- aa..x y,-mvoc.1.q+..a.+m o.iaeotqouoav,loq/aotionaeol,ees/AcdonRx ueo etnils.up... 9/7/20 l 1

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 33 of 79

Page 34: Doc.128

Dilmas Charities - Freshstart

+#

:.*t : l sM A S H A R lTI ES

'J' r-' .z@ Home searcu n sks Reports Administrationï;. ) xîp o

Traian BujduveanuAcnoN REQUESTS ACTION REQUEST DETAILS

CASE NoTss Staff gispert, ana

cLlsN7' lNFo Client Bujduveanu, Traianculsx'r sm y lNFo Number 3563

coNu c'rs Requested .9/1/2010 10.44 AM

CLIENT TAsxs Date

DISCHARGE status completedDRMNG INFO Dear Mr. Gispert, Thank you again for your response. I strongly believeEMPLOYMENT that a good way to clarify my status regarding Medical Conditions forEuetoovMsNv scueouuE which I was diagnosed,is to have a conversation with one of the doctorsFlxEo MovEMsN'rs Reason that have aseen me at Memorial Hospital Clinic,request all Medical

Records from memorial Hospital and from Bop,which are quiet

HOME coNF. extensive,

by the way. This will help to eliminate anydoubts regardin

MoveMEs'r REquEs'rs uedioay conditions reffered to. Best Regards Traian BujduveanuOFFENSES previous I believe we have set a meeting for today at 3:00pm. If any further info is

OPEN MovEMeNTs Responses needed we wilf advise you. Thank you./ Ana gispertPAYMENTS gispert ana 9/2Q010 2:44:0n PM

PROGRAMS Response

REQUIRED CHECKS

S7w-rus HlsToRy

susslsTeNce

SUMMARYSave Reset Cancel j Reassign

huaa.//annin-qerverm reshs esidentschedieiActionRequests/ActioG equestDeY ls.asp... 9/7/201 1

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 34 of 79

Page 35: Doc.128

Disnzas Charities - Freshstart Page 1 of 1

* .#* .. '*'*..

* ISM A S HA RITIES

. .ku . -jx w,...) (.p t>-. ' Home Search Tasks Reports Administration

Traian BujduveanuAcTloN REQUESTS ACTION REQUEST DETAILS

CASE NoTEs Staff gispert, ana

CUENT lNFo Client Bujduveanu, TraianCLIENT STAY INFo Number 3564

coNm c'rs Requested 9/1/2010 10:47 AMCLIENT TAsKs Date

DISCHARGE Status Completed .

DRIVING INFO Dear Ms. Gispert, Please be kind and help me clarify one of the mattersEMPLOYMENT that I did not understand clear from your staff. Having a medical

ReasonEMPLOYMENT SCHEOULE condition/waiver at this facility would not allow m e to visit my family or to

obtain a ''Social Pass''...???? Thank you Traian BujduveanuFlxEo MOVEMENTSHOME coNF. Previous W e can discuss this at the meeting today./ Ana gispert

Responses gispert ana 9/2/2010 2:45:00 pvMOVEMENT REQUESTS

ResponseOFFENSES

OPEN MovEMeN'rs

PAYMENTS

PRooM us

REQUIRED cHEcKsSave Reset Cancel ReassignSTATUS HlsTonv

SuBslsTeNcE

SUMMARY

he ://dr ia-se>erTreshse Residentschedules/ActionRequests/ActioG equestDetils.asp... 9/7/201 1

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 35 of 79

Page 36: Doc.128

Disma Chariées - FreshsM rit:u l kJ* *

-

.'* D MAs C HARITIES: . lS@*

:Q) (-i7 -z% Home search Tasks Repo- Administration< .>> V .w' G .

Traian BujduveanuAcnoN REQUEST DETAILSA

cnoN REouesTsCAse NoRs Staf gispel ana

CUENT lNFo Client Bujduveanu, TraianCLIENT STAY INgo Number 3899

coNm cvs Requested 10/19/2010 11:25 AMCLIENT n sKs Date

DlscuAnos status completedDRM NG INFO n is Ietter is to advise you that today 10/19/2010.10:50 am,l was œ lled toZMPLOYMENT the front desk and told that l should vacuum the room ''for himlin anEMPLOYMENT scHsout.e attempt to intimidate me. Ms. Gispertplease be aware *at as a result ofFlxso MovsMevrs alI actions aginst mevfor the Iast weekby Mr. Thomas and his sKftmy

Reason Iiver has swallow and I do experience pain. n is has been a great upset toHOME CONF. me

.and your stal members do not want to Ieave me in peace,and keep on

MOVEMENT ReouEs'rs harrassing mevwithout any reason. Please be kind and provide me with aOFFEN3ES BP-9 Formvso I can 5Ie my grievancies outside of the sphere Of *is

0pEN MoveMeN'rs ' ' ' i ' uveanuPAYMENTS Previous yoU HAVE BEEN GIVEN A DIRECTIVE TO VACUMN THE ROOM AS Aeaoou us Responses SANCTION, F-XTRA DUR , AND YOU REFUSEDJ aNA GISPERT

gispert ana 10/19/2010 5:29:cn PMREQUIRED CHECKS ResponseSKATUS HI:KORY

SusslsmENcE

SIJMMARY

Save Reset Gancel Reassign

u- ./zgoolo-comrovmveqbltlem mqlaentgnhedllleq/AczionRecuegl/AcdonRm uee eY ls-e .-. 9/7/201 1

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 36 of 79

Page 37: Doc.128

.Dism as Charities - Freshstart Page 1 of 1

* ** # **. .

* ISM A S HA RITIES

+'i ('?%' .LvLb Home search Tasks Reports Administration' ---- '' ---.... ...z 'r'czal.d

Traian BujduveanuAc'noN REQUESTS ACTION REQUEST DETAILS

cAsE No-rEs Staff gispert, ana

CLIENT lNFo Client Bujduveanu, TraianCLIENT STAY INFO Number 3489

coN7wc'rs Requested .8/24/2010 8.1 1 PM

CLIENT TAsKs Date

DISCHARGE status Completed

DRIVING INFO Dear Ms. Gispert Thank you for your quick response. Please be aware of

EMPLOYMENT the fact that I was diagnosed with the following medical conditions:EMeLOYMENT SCHEDULE Hepatitis C Virus Diabetes Liver Cirhosis Ascites TrombocytopeniaFIXED MOVEMENTS Reason Chronic Fatigue Possible Hepatocellullar Carciroma Regarding my

employment,please be advised that I am not allowed to Iook for a job now.HOME coNF. I would very much Iike to know also,when my CCC Status will be

MOVEMENT REQUESTS term inated. As I understand I can not do anything until this condition will

OFFENSES not be removed. Best Regards Traian BujduveanuOPEN MOVEMENTS Previous I am informed that your CCC was up on 8/24/10. I am also aware that youPAYMENTS Responses have an employment waiver, however, I understand you did not requestpaooo us this. If you would Iike to work, please advise me and we will ask the BOP

to rescind your medical waiver in order for you to Iook for a job. However,REQUIRED cHEcKsplease be aware that if you are considering applying for disability due to

sAwTus Hls-roRv dicaj condition upon your release, it might be affected by youryour me

SUBSISTENCE employment. Either way, consider this and respond to me which way youSUMMARY would Iike to go. lf you continue on your medical waiver, and you are

abiding by aII of the rules, expressing appropriate attitude towards staffetc, there is no reason why I would not entertain requests from you to takecare of your needs i.e shopping for hygiene supplies etc. /Ana Gispert

gispert, ana 8/30/2010 6:28:00 PM

Response

Save Reset Cancel Reassign

hûp:/t/dr ia-se> er/FreshstM esidentschedules/ActioG equests/ActioG equestDetails.asp... 9/7/201 1

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 37 of 79

Page 38: Doc.128

+

EXH IBIT 4

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 38 of 79

Page 39: Doc.128

Federal Bureau of Prisons 20/11/2012 20:00

Inm ate Locator - Locate Federal inmates from 1982 to present

Name Register # Age-Race-sex Release Date uocation

Y 1. TRAIAN BUJDUVEANU 80655-004 57-Y ite-M 01-03-2011 RELEASED

Results 1 - 1 of 1

New Search FAQS Privacv

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 39 of 79

Page 40: Doc.128

*

EXH IBIT 5

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 40 of 79

Page 41: Doc.128

.œw...-.- wuuuuwo - x xçazzoe s l'age 1 01 1

*/i--

m, DlsMAs C HARITIES@+Qf & t œ- Home searc: masks Repo- Adm-' - --'onlv- z w

Traian Bujduv- uAomox Ro uesTs AO ON Reœ BFr DG AIO

cAss No= SW : Adams, Lashonda

cusxr IxFo G ent Bujdw- nu, Traiancu- sAv INFo Num- 3235 .

CONTAO RM l**Ooax 7Q9QQ1Q 12:24 puC

u> TAsu

nlscl-aos - ,s èompleteuDRM NG 1* j wouj: jjke to as- chue sevl- evel Sunday m oming

uxatme VSMPLOYX Reaxn Romanlan Ocodox Chure 1- on ST.Rœd *5 and P-bmkeEMpuo- s- = lu = Plnes- .

Flxep M- > Pœvious You aœ only allowe to *- -1 e ln sve mB> Y *e œdlik forHo-s coNF. Respo- reRgious seM ees

we- ..l --- .okmoaolia:x eMMovs- RK ussTs . .

Respon-Op- ses

OpsN MQ''-- -PA=

PROO-

Reoule CHecxsœ ve R- œ nœ l R- ignSmAw s Hl= v

Sussls- ce

SUMMARY

h% :/gann1>> + - N> + H aM * e Y Aœ oG - A% o ' .e ... 9/7/201 1

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 41 of 79

Page 42: Doc.128

Page 1 of 1

Dikmas Chadées - Frtshstart

- -

.:, # # *' - ' :SM AS RITIw.. ,# I'

'-' 'e *-'''- ''- - ' ' '*''** * *'* '' *'* ' ''' '*'' '

.

.- . ...- . . .-.- w. .. . . . . .... .. .- - - ,..- -w'- -- .

- '' ' ' - Home search---raw à Reports - - - - - - -

. 1 -.. . '

. .x . '' tx ... .- . .. ..

Traian Bulduveanu' - -- MOVEMENR M QUEST DETAILSAcmoN RK OESTS gaff Adams

. LashonSta

cAs: NoTEs jant Bulduveanu. TraClienculENT I<FO Requested Date 8/4/2010ct-laN4' STAY INFO

Requested F0r Date 8/5/2010Cosnwc'rs Locations General stare opCUENT TAsKs streeu streeu citv

NameDîSCHARGE riaj 8O1 S. Pembfoke FL 33023MemoDnlvlNo INFO Regjonal Hospital Dotlglas Rd Pines

EMPLOYMENT Requested Out Time 8:00 AMEMPLOYMENT SCHEDQLE

tion 5 Houqs) 0 Minutels)FGED MOVEMENTS DUX

HOME Co<F- Mode Of Transported by Family/FriendMOVEMENT REQUESTS W ansportation TO

OFFENSES Mode Of 'rransported by Famil/FriendTransportation From

opeu MOVEMENTS k n visitial Regional Hospital for physic aReason Momof

PAYMENIS for details)Fixed Movement (clickStattls Approv'd as

PROGRAMS

REQUIRED CHECKS cancel

STATUS HISTORY

SUBSISTENCQ

SUMMARY

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 42 of 79

Page 43: Doc.128

Page 1 of 1

Dtsmas charities - Freshstart

y** . jsM As HAR-I.* :

-

'Q Home searcu 'tasks Rè-/-oftà - ''* 5 . -

Traian Bujduveanu- MOVEMENT REQUEST DQTAILSAcmoN REQUESTS uashondaStaff Adams,cAs: NoTEs Traian

t BUIdIJVO3DU.Client7ulsNT INFO Requested Date 8/5/2010CLIENT STAY INFO

Requested For Date 8/6/2010'cloNTAcTs

tions General tc cuy state zipCUENT TASKS LOCa w eet4 Stree

NameDISCHARGE Memorial 4105 Pem bfoke Hollywood FL 33020

lsF0 Hospital Clinic tRoadDRIVING

EMPLOYMENT Mted Out Time 8:00 ARequesEMPLOYMENT SCHEDULE

5 Hourls) 0 Minutels)M OVEMENTS Dtlo tionFlxEo

HOME CONF. Mode Of Transported by Family/FriendREQUESTS Transportation T0MOVEMENT

OFFessEs Mode Of Transported by Family/FriendTransportation Fromo

psN MoveMEx'rs ital Adult ClinicDoctor VisitN emorial HOSPPAYMENTS Reason for details)Fixed Movement (click

Approved asPROGRAMS Status

RECUIRED CHECK3 cancel

STAT:S HISTORY

SuBslsTehlcE

SUMMARY

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 43 of 79

Page 44: Doc.128

# w

Dismas Charities - Freshstmrt

Page 1 of 1

Zx IsM As H ARITIES

MOVEMENT REQ:EST DETAILSStaff Adams, Lashonda

Client Bujduveanu, TraianRequested Date 8/25/2010

Requested For 8/26/2010

DateLocations Genera!Name Btreetl strczeu city 3t<e Zip

Memorial Hospital Clinî embroke Road Pembroke Pines FL 33024

Requested Out .11.05 AM

TimeDuration 3 qourls) 30 Minutels)

Mode Of Transported by Family/FriendTransportation To

Mode OfTransportation Transported by Family/Friend

From

Reason

Status

Cancel )I

I need to go back to Memorial Hospital Clinic to get Alcohol Swabs/pads and a gun to drivethe lacets into my skin. They were missing from my package. This is neccessafy in order to

avoid infection.Approved as Fixed Movement (click for details)

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 44 of 79

Page 45: Doc.128

*

EXH IBIT 6

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 45 of 79

Page 46: Doc.128

14 53 1 68 EPI :

102475 O38 10/19/10CENTRALBUSINESS OFFICEBUJDUVEANU ,TRAIANPatient Accounting Sefvces

rd Avenue, Ft Lpudertalç, FL 33 - l 2 / 11 / 19 S 4 AGE : 5 5 M1608 S.E. 3954-811$k315

1'0 OUR CIJSTOMERS...

As a counesy to you, we will bill your hospital charges to each of your insurance carriers. You may actively participafe in ensuring gagn'b ent-by yötlrtinsurance company by calling to request prompt payment.

To speak with our representatives about your bill durinez your hospital stay or while at the facil-lty, you may call a Rnancial Counselor:

BROWARD HFALTH BROWARD GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER 5471BROWARD HFALTH CORAL SPRINGS MEDICAL CENTER 3006BROWARD HEALTH IMPERIAL POINT MEDICAL CENTER 870:

BROWARD HFALTH NORTH BROWARD MEDICA: CENTER 2499 or 6589BROWARD HEALTH WESTON 2667

For assistance with yoor hospital bill after your services are completed, you may call our Customer Service Department.

lt is open from 8:00 AM to 4:45 PM, Monday through Friday.

CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT: 954.847.4315

OR WRITE TO US AT: Broward Health - Central Business Office1608 SE 3d Avenue, Ft Lauderdale, Ft 33316

Following treatment at one of the hospitals, it is possible for you to receive several separate ant distinct bills for services prcvidet. Only one of these

bills is fr-om the hospital..

' . ' ( . : ,..,. : i r

Please note that the hospital bill will not inc-lude any semices provided by ghysicians. The doctors will bill separately for their prcfessional fees.Besides your private doctor and other specialists, the following physicians may biil yoU degecting tlpon the semices yoU received.

ANESTHESIOLOGIST Bltl-RADl0L061ST BILLEMERGENEY PHYSICIAN BILLPATHOLOGIST BILL* CARDIOLOGIST BILL# 24 HOIJR HOLITER MONITO2# SIRESS TEST* NEONATOLOGIST BII.L

# OBSTETRIC/GYNECOLOGIST# PEDIATRICIAN BILL

ANESCONoflh Brnward Radiologist GrougPhoenix

Quantum Medical

954.485.5666954.839.8400800.700.1924800.846.7978

* Foc aIl communication wlating to the akove services, please reference bill rerrivrd for conyact informgtior!. . .. . . .

. .A

THE ABOVE LISTED PHYSICIANS GROUPS MAY OR MAY NOT BE A NETWORK PRQVIDER FOR ALL HMO/PPOS.

Please Le advised that the exact price of services provided cannot be detecmined until after you have been treated since seaices rendered may vaf'ydepending on a physician's findings. Sef-vice prices grovided at time of registration 2re estimates only.I acknowledge that 1 have Feat and understand the above informatîon and have received a cogy of this note.

zh f( ,1 v'm

. q. I g zwl p' '#,' z nr . z .-a..y. ,s. . p j r - j , vr-.; .g t).x u./w fs) neuh yW*) z .+ I YJ Xq 0-/ .s y Cy' y x Vg# w œcuAf j ,,' Jaz 'c 'k ;y' %. ' . '' z'N ' ( r..'z *-,:-.,4,. '--- :r / / ) ...... J / .... (-..z t ..: / wl /..ta' ) l (. . ' < twt ,' -3 >'' . ,xz

. . / Lz - I z . . . d ,

7 . . wetngssPatlent Slgnatere Date l

?n',t,b5 . i 313,54()r.) . 4F') b'rtok; 900 1 28

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 46 of 79

Page 47: Doc.128

*

Brow ard General M edical Center

Nà-iiiéFTRAIAV'BUZDUW ANU

DOB: 12/11/1954M RN: 1453168

FIN: 102475038Visit Date: 10/$ 9/2010 8:31200 PM Current Date: 1 0/20/201 O 1 2:34:32 AM

Emergency Deyartment Care Providers:Prim ary Physlcian: YEH MD, RONALD, ED Primary Phys

Broward Heafth would Iike to thank you for allowing us to assist you with your healthcare needs.

The f'ollowing includes patient education materials and information regarding your injur/illness.

Patient Education Materials

TRAIAN BUJDUVEANU has been given the following patient education materials:

Endocrine

DIABETES W ITH HIGH BLOOD SUGARYou have been treated for high blcod sugar (hyperglycemia). This may be the result of an infection orother illness, not following your diet (eating too many sweets or starches), not taking enough insulin, orother factors.

HOM E CARE:toms that you can Iearn to recognize, such as those Iisted below.1) High blood sugar may cause symp

2) lf you feel like your blood sugar may be too high, measure it using a blood or urine test. lf it is aboveyour usual range, use the ''sliding scale'' Regular insulin dose your doctor gave you to correct this. lf

no ''sliding scale'' orders were given, contact your doctor for fudher advice.

3) lf your blood sugar is over 300, and you can't reach your doctor, call or return to this facility.

FOLLOW UP: Monitor and write down your blood sugars at Ieast twice a day (before breakfast and beforedinner). Do this for the next 3-5 days. See your doctor during the next week to reviekv these records.You will find out if you need to adjust your insulin dose.

RETURN PROMPTLY or contact your doctor if any of the following occur:- - HIGH BLOOD SUGAR: frequent urination, feeling dizz'y, thirst, headache, nausea or vomiting,

abdom inal pain, drowsiness or loss of consciousness-- LOW BLOOD SUGAR: fatigue, headache, shakes, excess sweating, hunger, anxiety, reduced

vision, drowsiness, weakness, confusion or loss of consciousness

N w

LO PLATELETSYour platelet levels were Iow today. Platelets help with blood clotting and may be low from various factors

including alcohol, infections, Iiver problems, blood problems, cancer, drugs or medications..

lf any bleeding or easy bruising occurs, seek prom pt m edical attention.

10/20/2010 12:34:32 AMName: TRAIAN BUJDUVEANUMRN: 1453168

Copyright @ 1990-2007Parker Hil! Associates, lnc.

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 47 of 79

Page 48: Doc.128

Name: TRAIAN BUJDUVEANU MRN: 1453168

HOME CARE:PAIN MANAGEMENT'.

- USe acetaminophen (Tylenol) for mild pain.. -. .. . .....- - -- - - ..-

0.. ov.not.-take-any-product-that-contains-aspirinvThis.wilLworsen-your-tendency..to-bleed..-- ---- .-.--------.

- DO not use ibuprofen (Motrin, Advil, and others) or naproxen (Aleve, Naprosyn and others) unless

advised to do SO by your doctor.- USe prescription Rain medicine Only as prescribed. Overuse of narcotics may lead to addiction.

- In the case of a joint bleed, apply an ice pack 20 minutes at a time every 2 hours for joint pain. Limit

joint movement.

ACTIVITY:lt is impodant to keep up physical strength. This helps protect joints from injury and internal bleeding.

Physical activity should be restricted accordinj to severity of the disease.- Solo snorts such as swimming, running, blcycling are okay for those with mild dzsease.

- Team snorts such as soccer, basketball or baseball carry more risk of injury and should be avoided

by those with moderate to severe disease.-

Heavv contact spods such as wrestling, footbafl and hockey are dangerous for all those with

hemophilia and shoutd be avoided.

FOLLQW UP with your doctor for regular check-ups as directed.

RETURN PROMPTLY or contact your doctor if any of the following occur:

- Any serious physical injury- Gum bleeding that won't stop (usually in teething children)- Bleeding from the skin not controlled by constant direct pressure for ten minutes

- Joint pain or swelling (usually knee, elbow, ankle, shoulder, wrist)- Head injury (whether or not you are knocked out)- Severe headache with nausea or vomiting- Seizure, unexpected drowsiness or confusion

- Severe backache, paralysis of an arm or leg

-- Nosebleeds that do not respond to pinching the nose for 10 minutes

- Blood in the urine (bright red or dark colorly or in the stool or vomit (black or red color)

- Jaundice (yellowing of the eyes)

G IHEPATITIS W PE CHepatitis is a contagious viral infection of the Iiver. There are three common types: A, B and C. You haveType C. This disease is usually passed when you come in contact with blood from a person who has thevirus. The most common form of transmission today is IV drug use. lf you received a blood transfusion

before 1992 (before there was widespread testing for this virus) you might have been exposed. Havingmultiple sexual padners is also a risk factor. However, the chance of getting the virus from an infected

person in your home or from an infectet sexual partner in a long-term monogamous (single partner)

relationship is very low.

ln most cases, there are no symptoms during the initial infection. Mild symptoms occur in about one-third ofcases. They include fatigue, loss of appetite and natlsea. Hepatitis C becomes ''chronic'' in over half of thecases. W hile most persons with chronic Hepatitis C have no symptoms or long-term effects, there is a 20Q/o

chance of getting cirrhosis (scarring) of the Iiver 10-20 years Iater. lf that happens, there is a 1-5% chance

() ge Ing Ner cancer. egreatest risk for Iong term problems from this disease.)

Therefore, alI persons with Hepatitis C need to be checked by their doctor at least once a year to be surethe inflammation is not getting worse. There is no vaccine for Hepatitis C. There is no cure for this illnessonce it becomes chronic. However, there is a treatment called INTERFERON that can be used by patients

with signs of worsening Iiver dîsease. You can discuss this further with your doctor.

HOME CARE (sym ptom freel:1 ) A diet low in saturated fats and high in fruits and vegetables is best for you and your Iiver. Small,

Name: TRAIAN BUJDUVEANU 10/20/2010 12:34:32 AM

MRN: 1453168 Copyright @ 1990-2007 Parker Hill Associates, Inc.

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 48 of 79

Page 49: Doc.128

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 49 of 79

Page 50: Doc.128

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 50 of 79

Page 51: Doc.128

y

EXHIBIT 7

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 51 of 79

Page 52: Doc.128

Vx x ., p N. . 4 law

-1 uiami. yz JJI-U

305-9614296

U.S. Depaument of Justke

Unitedstates Attorney

Southern District ofFlorida

August 7, 2012

Via US M ail

Traian Bujduveanu5601 W Bxoward Blvd.

Plantation, FL 33317

Re: Subpoena To FX Miami and Unite Stato Manhals SeM ce in Bujduveanu v.Dismas Charities, Inm et aI., Case Nm 11-2012*CIV-SIM ONTON

Dear Mr. Bujduveanu:

Enclosed you will flnd the supplemental resm nse to your subpoenas in the abovecaptioned case. n e enclosed documents were plinted &om the SENTRY system. Ple%e let meknow if this satisses your request. A pdf copy of the document was also sent via email.

Very lm ly yours,

W IFREDO A. FERRERUNITED STATES A'IT RN Y ,/

ef

?

By:M thony Pogorze i '

Assistant United States A ey

Enclosure

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 52 of 79

Page 53: Doc.128

MIAGM 531.01 *PAGD 0Ql *

REG NO..: 80655-004 NAME....: BUJD . TRAIANCATEGORY: ARS FUNCTION: PRT FORMAT: MOVEMENT

INMATE HISTORY

ADM-REL

* 07-06-2012

* 08:58:44

SUB-FACL ASSIGNMENT- =--Y MIM GCT REL

*- MIM A-BOP HLD- - - - qF6-U RELEASE- - -=+ 6-U A-ADMIT

----7 CMM CCCS TRANSFERCMM CCCS A -DES6-U RZLRAIE6-U A-ADMITCMM HCONS TRANSFERCMM HCONS A -HC SENT6-U RELEASE6-U A-ADMITCMM CCCS TRANSFBRCMM CCCS A -DESCMM ADMIN A-DESCMM ADMIN A-DES6-U RELEASE

- - - -H/ 6-U A-ADMIT.---=e CMM ADMIN ADMIN REL----q* CMM ADMIN A-REL CHNG- - - -> 6-I RELEASE----d> 6.z A-ADMIT

v---o MIM ADMIN REL> MIM A-BOP HLD

- - -a:p6-U RELEASE- - - -AP6-U A-ADMIT----QPCMM CCCS ADMIN REL- - - + CMM CCCS A-REL CHNG- -- <P CMM CCCS ADM CRANGE-- - - - W-CMM CCCS A-ADMIN

-----416-1 RELEASE- - - - -1 6-I A-ADMIT

MIM ADMIN REL- - - -21 MIM A-BOP HLD

----q> 6-U RELEASE6-U A-ADMIT

- - - -61 CMM CCCS TRANSFERCMM CCCS A-DES6-U RELEASE6-U A-ADMIT

E F F E C T I V E

MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION DATE TIMEGOOD CONDUCT TIME RBL (CCCA) 01-03-2011 0926HOLDOVER FOR INST TO INST TRF l0-2Q-2010 ISOSRELAAAED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 10-2G-2Ql0 1505ADMITTBD TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 1Q-20-2QlQ lQ21TRANSFER-OTHER (NO REDESIG) 10-25-2010 1021TRANSFER RECEIVED l0-l3-2QlQ 1638RBLZAIED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 10-13-2010 1638ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 10-13-2010 1636

TRANSFER-OTHER (NO REDESIG) 10-13-2010 1636TRANSFER RECEIVED 09-28-2010 1310RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL Q9-28-2010 1310ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 09-28-2010 1306

TRANSFBR-OTHER (NO RBDESIG) 79-28-2010 1306TRANSFER RECEIVED 07-28-2010 1954TRANSFER-PROGRAM PARTICIPATION 07-28-2010 1954TRANSFER RECEIVED 07-28*2010 1952RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL l1-lS-20l0 0813ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 11-01-2010 1243ADMINISTRATIVE RELEASB 11-0l-2Ql0 1243ADMISSION FOR RELEASE CHANGE ll-0l-20lQ 1238RELRASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 11-15-2010 Q8llADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL l1-l5-2QlQ 9809ADMINISTRATIVE RELEASE ll-l5-20lQ 0809HOLDOVER FOR INST TO INST TRF 11-01-2010 1241RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 11*01-2010 1241ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL ll-ûl-2Q10 1236ADMINISTRATIVB RELEASE 11*01-2010 1236

ADMISSION FOR RELEASE CHANGE 11-01*2010 1234RELEASE FOR ADMISSION CHANGE l1-Ql-20lQ 1232ADMINISTRATIVE ADMISSION 11-01-2010 1230RBLEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 1l-01-20lQ 1230ADMITTED TO AN TN-TRANSIT FKCL 11-01-2010 1222

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIAAE ll-01-20lQ 1222

HOLDOVER FOR INST TO INST TRF 10-20-2010 1513RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 10-20-2010 1513ADMTTTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 10-20-2010 1019TRANSFER-OTHER (NG REDESIG) 10-20-2010 1019TRANSFER RECEIVED 10-l4-20lQ 0858

RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL l0-l4-20lQ 0858ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 10-13-2010 1634

G0002 MORE PAGES TO FOLLOW

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 53 of 79

Page 54: Doc.128

MIAGM 531.01 *PAGE 001 *

REG NO..: 80655-004 NAME....:CATEGORY: ARS FUNCTION:

BUJDUVEANV, TRAIANPRT FORMAT :

INMATE HISTORYADM-REL

:7-06-201209:46:39

FCL ASSIGNMENT DESCRIPTION START DATE/TIME STOP DATC/TIMEM1M GCT RCL GOOD CONDUCT TIMB REL (CCCA) 01-03-2011 0926 CURRENT

e--dv MIM A-BOP HLD HOLDOVER FOR INST TO INST TRF 10-20-2010 1SQ5 01-03-2011 0926.--W> 6-U RELEASE RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 10-20-2010 1505 10-20-2010 lS05

6-U A-ADMIT ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL l0-20-20lQ 1021 10-20-2010 1505e --Y> CMM TRANSFER TRKNSFER 10-20-201Q 1021 10-2Q-2010 lQ2l

CMM A-DES DESIGNATED, AT ASSIGNED FACIL 10-13-2910 1638 10-20-2010 10216-U RELEASE RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 10-13-2010 1638 1:-13-2010 1638

6-U A-ADMIT ADMITTED TQ AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 10-13-2010 1636 10-13-2010 1638CMM TRANSFER TRANSFZR 1Q-13-2010 1636 l0-l3-2QlQ 1636CMM A-HC SENT HOME CONFINEMENT-SENTENCED 09-28-2019 1310 10-13-2010 16366-U RELEASE RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 09-28-2û10 1310 09-28-2910 13106-U A-ADMIT ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 09-28-2010 1306 09-28-2010 1310CMM TRANSFER TRANSFER 09-28-201: 1306 09-28-2010 13Q6CMM A -DES DESIGNATED . AT ASSIGNED FACIL 07-28-2910 1952 09-28-2010 1306

N-we 6-U RELEASE RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL ll-1S-2010 0813 11-15-2010 08136-U A-ADMIT ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 11-01-2010 1243 ll*1S-2Ol0 0813

- - CMM ADMIN REL ADMINISTRATIVE RRLTAI: 11-01-2010 1243 ll-0l-2Ql0 1242----- CMM A-REL CHNG ADMISSION FOR RBLEASE CHANGE 11-01-2010 1238 11-01-2010 1243--- 6-I RELEASE DILEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 11-15-2010 0811 11-15-2010 0811----* 6-I A-ADMIT ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL ll*l5-2QlQ 0809 11-15-2010 0811---- MIM ADMIN REL ADMINISTRATIVE RELEASE ll-lS-20l0 0809 11-15-2010 0809. - - = MIM A-BOP HLD HOLDOVER FOR INST TO INST TRF l1-0l-2QlQ 1241 11*15-2010 08Q9

- 6-U RELEASE RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL ll-0l-2ûl0 1241 ll-Ql-20l0 1241

--- 6-U A-ADMIT ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL l1-01-20lD 1236 ll-0l*2Ql9 1241---- CMM ADMIN REL ADMINISTRATIVE RELEASE ll-Q1-20l0 1236 ll-Ql-20lQ 1236

CMM A-REL CHNG ADMISSION FOR RELEASE CHANGE ll-Ql-2Ql0 1234 11-01-2010 1236'CMM ADM CHANGE RELEASE FOR ADMISSION CHANGE 11-01-2010 1232 11-01-2010 1234

v---- CMM A-ADMIN ADMINISTRATIVE ADMISSION 11-01*2010 1230 11-01-2010 1232---- 6-I RELEASE RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 11-01-2010 123Q 11-01-2910 1230e--- 6-I A-ADMIT ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 1l-0l-20lû 1222 11-01-2010 1230e---- MIM ADMIN REL ADMINISTRATTVE RELEASE 11-01*2010 1222 ll-0l-201û 1222---- MIM A-BOP HLD HOLDOVER FOR INST TO INST TRF 1Q-2Q-201Q 1513 l1-Ql-20lû 1222------ 6-U RELEASE RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 10-20-2010 1513 10-20-2010 1513

<---- 6-U A-ADMIT ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 10-20-2910 1019 10-20*2010 1513WCMM TRANSFER TRANSFER 10-20*2010 1019 l0-2Q-2Qlû 1019CMM A-DES DCSIGNATED , AT ASSIGNED FACTL 10-14-2010 0858 lQ-2Q-20l0 1019

6-U RELEASE RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 10-14-2010 0858 10-14-2010 08586-U A-ADMIT ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 10-13-2010 1634 10-14-2010 0858CMM TRANSFER TRANSFER 10-13-2010 1634 10-13-2010 1634CMM A-HC SENT HOME CONFINEMENT-SENTENCED 09-28-2010 1304 10-13-2010 1634

- --P CMM ADM CHANGE RELEASE FOR ADMISSION CHANGE 09-28*2010 1302 09-28*2010 1304

G0002 MORE PAGES TO FOLLOW

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 54 of 79

Page 55: Doc.128

07-06-2012

09:46:39

MIAGM 531.01 *PAGE 002 OF 002 *

REG NO..: 90658-:04 NAME - . . : BUJD , TRAIANCATEGORY: ARS FUNCTION; PRT FORMATI

INMATE HISTORY

ADM-REL

FCLCMM6-U6-UG MC%6-O6-OCOLCOL

COLCOLBl4Bl4

MIMMIMMIMMIM

ASSIGNMENT DBSCRIPTION START DATE/TIME STOP DATE/TIMEA-DES DESIGNATED. AT ASSIGNED FACIL 09-28-2010 1300 09-28-2010 1302RELIAIE RBLRAQED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL Q9-28-201Q 1309 99-28-2910 1399A-ADMIT ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 09-28-2Q10 1257 09-28-2010 13Q0TRANSFER TRANSFER 09-28-2019 1257 09-28-2010 1257A-DES DESIGNATED, AT ASSIGNED FACIL 07-28-2010 1950 09-28-2010 1257RELE

ASE RSLEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 07-28-2010 1950 07-26-2010 1950A-ADMIT ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 07-28-2010 1159 07*29*2ö10 1950FURL TRAN

S FURL W/UNESCORTED TRF TO A CCC 07-28-2010 1159 07-28-2010 11S9A-DES DESIGNATCD. AT ASSIGNED FACIL Q1-18-2010 2325 Q7-28-2Q:Q 1159LOOAL HOSP ESC TRIP TO LOCAl. HOSP W/RETN 0l-ll-20lQ 1815 01-18-2010 2325A

-DES DESIGNATED. AT ASSIGNED FACIL 08-04-2009 1009 01-11-2010 l8lSRELEASE RELkAAED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 08-û4-2009 1009 08-û4-2009 1009A-ADMIT ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 08-04-2009 0407 08-04-2009 1009HLD

REMOVE HOLDOVER REMOVED 08-04-2009 04Q7 08-04-2009 Q407A-HLD HOLDOVER, TEMPORKRILY SOUSED 07-15-2009 1531 08-04-2009 0407ADM

CHANGZ RELRAAE FOR ADMISSION CHANGE 07-15- 2009 1530 07-15-2009 1531A-PKE PRE-SENT ADMIT

, ADULT 06-21-2008 1057 07-15-2009 1530

G0000 TRANSACTION SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 55 of 79

Page 56: Doc.128

MIAGM 531.01 *

PAGE 002 OF Q02 *

REG NO..: 80655-004 NAME....: BUJDUVEANU, TRAIANCATEGORY : ARS FUNCTION : PRT FORMAT : MOVEMENT

ARM E F F E C T I V ESUB-FACL ASSIGNMENT CODE MOVEMENT DESCRIPTION DATE TIMECMM HCONS TRANSFER 30l TRANSFER-OTHDR (NO REDESIG) 1Q-l3-201Q 1634CMM HCONS A-HC SENT l98 TRANSFER RBCDIVED 09-28-2010 1304CMM HCONS ADM CHANGE 392 RBLRAAE FOR ADMISSION CHANGE 09-28-2Q10 1302CMM HCONS A-DES 198 TRKNSFER RECEIVED 09-28-2010 13:06-U RELEASE 391 RELEASRD FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 09-28-2010 13006-U A-ADMIT 09l ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 09-28-2910 1257CMM CCCS TRANSFER 30l TRANSFER-OTHZR (NO REDBSIG) 09-28-2010 1257CMM CCCS A-DES 199 FURLOUGH TRANSFER RECEIVED Q7-28-2G10 195Q6-O RELEASE 39l RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 07-28-2010 l9S06-O A-ADMIT 09l ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 07-28-2010 1159COL FURL TRANS 276 FURL W/UNESCORTED TRF TO A CCC 07-28-2010 1159COL A-DES 164 OTHER AUTH ABSENCE RETURN 01-18-2010 2325

COL LOOAT. HOSP 254 BSC TRP TO LOCAL HOSP W/RETN 01-11-2010 1815COL A-DES lû1 US DISTRICT COURT COMMITMENT 08-D4-2009 10Q9Bl4 RELEASE 39l RELEASED FROM IN-TRANSIT FACL 08-04-2009 1009Bl4 A-ADMIT 09l ADMITTED TO AN IN-TRANSIT FACL 08-04-2009 Q409MIM HLD REMOVE 265 HOLDOVER REMOVED 08-04-2009 0407MIM A-HLD l65 HOLDOVER

, TEMPORARILY HOUSED 07-15-2009 1531MIM ADM CHANGE 392 RELEASE FOR ADMISSION CHANGE 07-15-2009 1530MIM A-PRE l66 PRE-SENT ADMIT , ADULT 06-21-2008 1057

INMATE HISTORY

ADM-REL:7-Q6-2012

08:58:44

P5269G0000

MOVEMENT INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE PRIOR TO 09-2:-1991TRANSACTION SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 56 of 79

Page 57: Doc.128

STATEMENT OF WORK

(sow)

RESIDENTIAL REENTRY CENTER

August 2007

Revision 01, Decomher 2007, CCBRevision 02 , Deco-Her 2008, CCB

Revision 03, February 2010, CCB

Revision 04, May 2010, CCB

Revision 05, May 2011, CCB

Revision 06, January 2012, QQMWRevision 07, February 2012, RQMR

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 57 of 79

Page 58: Doc.128

offense itself. In these cases, the letter ''A'' is combined with

the offense code. For example, planning an escape would be

considered an Escape and coded 102A . Likewise, attempting the

adulteration of any food or drink would be coded 209A.

Suspensions of Any Sanction - Suspensions of any

sanction cannot exceed six months. Revocation and execution of

a suspended sanction require that the offender first is found to

have committed any subsequent prohibited act. The CDC may

execute, suspend, or revoke and execute suspensions of sanctions

G through P. Revocations and execution of suspensions may be

made only at the level which originally imposed the sanction.

3. PROCEDURES UPON ADMISSION TO RRC - The contractor will

develop a pamphlet, summarizing the disciplinary system toinclude BOP prohibited acts and contractorls rules of conduct.

The offenders will be given the pamphlet when they first arrive

at the RRC as part of the orientation program. A signed receipt

is to be obtained from each offender acknowledging that a copy

of the pamphlet was received and is to be placed in the

offender's file.

The contractor will, to the extent reasonably available, have a

qualified staff member or translator to help offenders who have

a language or literacy problem understand the BOP rules on

discipline. When a significant portion of the offender

population speaks a language other than English, the pamphlet is

to be made available in that language. The contractor will post

copies of the rules at a prominent location, accessible to a1l

offenders.

TYPES OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION .

A .

misconduct

resolution

considered

contractor

A record of the misconduct and the informal resolution in the

300 or 400 level codes (whether between the offender and thewriter of the report, or the offender and the CDC) will bemaintained in the offender's file. A record of any informal

resolutions will be maintained by the facility director for

twelve months. The record is to reflect the offender's name,

register number, subject of the informal resolution, and the

Informal Resolution - The contractor may resolve

through an informal resolution process. Informal

of misconduct is preferred and will always be

before taking formal disciplinary action. The

can only informally resolve 300 and 400 level codes.

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 58 of 79

Page 59: Doc.128

agreed upon disposition . This procedure should enable the

facility director and others as necessary, to monitor the

informal resolution process.

rNOTE: Staff may suspend disciplinary proceedings for a

period not to exceed two calendar weeks while informal

resolution is undertaken and accomplished. If informal

resolution is unsuccessful, staff may reinstate

disciplinary proceedings at the same stage at which they

were suspended. The time requirements then begin

running again, at the same point at which they were

suspended.

5. BOP INCIDENT REPORT (RRC'S) - Staff will prepare an

incident report on a11 major violations that are not subject toinformal resolution. The BOP encourages informal resolution

(requiring consent of 50th parties) of incidents involving

violations of regulations. However, staff will prepare anincident report when there is reasonable belief that a violation

of regulations has been committed, and considers an informal

resolution inappropriate or unsuccessful. Reporting staff will

complete Part I of the incident report.

Note: When a volunteer observes a violation, that

person will submit a written description of the

incident and a staff member will complete the BOP

incident report. In addition, staff may complete an

incident report from information on a police report.

The charge may be translated into terms of the

prohibited acts. A telephone report from an approved

laboratory of a positive urinalysis is sufficient

evidence to write a report; however, documentary

confirmation must be obtained before the formal

hearing .

The entire language of the prohibited actts) does not have to becopied. Only the relevant portion need be used. For example,

''destroying government property, Code 218'' ''possessing

narcotics, Code 113'' would be acceptable listings for

appropriate charges.

%he description of the incident should contain the details of

the activity which is being reported . A1l facts about the

incident known by the employee and that are not confidential,

should be recorded. If there is anything unusual about the

offender's behavior, this would be noted. The reporting

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 59 of 79

Page 60: Doc.128

employee should also list those persons (staff, offenders,others) present at the scene, and the disposition of any

physical evidence (weapons, property, etc.) that the employeemay have personally handled. The report is also to reflect any

immediate action taken during the incident, including the

notification of law enforcement. The reporting employee will

sign the report and indicate his or her title in the appropriate

blocks. The date and time of the report being signed should be

entered. The incident report should then be forwarded to the

aopropriate investigating officer for disposition.

Staff will give each offender charged with violating a BOP

prohibited act a written copy of the chargels) against theoffender, ordinarily within 24 hours of the time staff became

aware of the offender's involvement in the incident. This is

accomplished by providing the offender a copy of PART I of the

incident report. The staff member will note the date and time

the offender received a copy of the incident report.

6. SPECIAL REPORT WRITING INSTRUCTIONS - Because of national

data collection requirements, the contractor will obtain

guidance when one of the following violations occurs:

* Code 100 - Killing

* Code 1O1 - Assaulting any Person (Seriousl...

* Code 107 - Taking Hostages

* Code 203 - Threatening Another with Bodily Harm

* Code 205 - Engaging in Sexual Acts

* Code 206 - Making Sexual Proposals or Threats to Another

* Code 224 - Assaulting any Person (Less Serious)

7. INVESTIGATION - Staff will conduct the investigation

promptly unless circumstances beyond the control of the

investigating officer intervene. The facility director will

appoint an investigating officer ordinarily within 24 hours of

the time the violation is reported . Staff writing the reportmay not investigate the report. The investigation is initiated

and ordinarily completed within 24 hours of this appointment.

If the investigation cannot be completed in three days, the

contractor will document the reasons and notify the RRM .

The investigating officer is responsible for attaching these

completed forms to the incident report and providing the

c'ffender with copies.

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 60 of 79

Page 61: Doc.128

EXH IBIT 8

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 61 of 79

Page 62: Doc.128

MIAGM 600.00 * SECURITY/DESIGNATION 07-06-2012PAGt 00l OF 00l * DATA * 09:15:02

REGNO: 80655- 64 NAME: BUJDUVEANU, TRAIAN ORG: DSCRC/SEX/AGE: W/M/57 FORM D/T: 07-21-2009/0930 RES: PLANTATION, FL 33317

OFFN/CHG..; 18:371 CONSP TO VIOL THE INT'L EMER ECON PWRS ACT IRANTRAN REGACT 35 MO 3 YR SRT DKT l:08-20612-CR-SEITZ-002

cusToDY..: BIL: CITIZENSHP: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

cIM CONS.: SEPARATION USM : FFLS

JUDGE....: SEITZ RECFACL/PGM: ACAP FT LAUD/NONE VOLSUR: NO

VS DT/LOC: MOS REL: 0l8 SEVERITY: GREATESTCHP/CHS/S: 000/00/PSI VIOLENCE: NONE ESCAPES.: NONEDETAINER.: NONE AGE: 36-54 EDUC LV: NO HS/GED,NO GED PGM HGC: UNKDRUG/ALC.: < 5YRS AGO TOTAL: 12 SEC LVL: LOWPuB SAFTY: GRT SRV CAR: CAREI OMDT REF: NO

CCM RMKS.: L/BLS. PROCURED US MADE MILITARY PARTS FOR BUYERS IN IRAN VIAUNITED ARAB EMIRATES; PR:'75 BREACH PEACE=FINEICITZCUSA '85

M:CIRRHOSIS LIVER, HEP C, TYPE 2 DIABETES, THROMBOCYTOPENIA

(LOW PLCLT CT) TRD: 01-03-11DESIG: COLEMAN FCI-LOW DSC LNC 07-22-2009 RSN: LEVEL MSL:

MGTV/MVED-:DESIG RMKS : JUD COMPLY

GQ005 TRANSACTION SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED - CONTINUE PROCESSING IF DESIRED

ho s://% p.tcp.doj.gov:9o49/SN RY/J1PPGoo.do 7/6/2012

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 62 of 79

Page 63: Doc.128

MIAGM

PAGE 001

INMATE DISCIPLINE

INCIDENT REPORT HISTORY

* 07-06-2012

09:08:26*

RPTNO: 1 43510 REGNO: 80655-004 NAME: BUIDUVEANU, TRAIANRSP OF: MIM-MIAMI FDC

STATUS STATUS DATE/TIME FCL TOH UPDATED BY INVESTIG KEYING DATE/TID

12 04-26-2010 1035 COL UDC J.BOLEY/B-3 C.WILLIA 04-26-2010 COLFNSANCTIONEDREMARKS; INMATE WAS SANCTIONED TO 30 DAYS LOSS OF TRULINCS. HE

ORIGINALLY HAD 60 DAYS LOSS OF TRULINCS,

PEND UDC 04-26-2010 1030 C0L UDC J.80LEY/B-3

REVISED

C.WILLIA 04-26-2010 COLFN

04-22-2010 1351 SER 04-22-2010 SERAQ

REMARKS: CHANGED SANCTION LP OTHER (1) TNFORMATIONWITHIN HEARING 03-09-2010 1420, ACT 312

SANCTIONED 03-09-2010 1420 COL uDC J.BOLEY/B-3 C.WILLIA 03-09-2010 COLFN

REMARKS: THIS WAS A REHEARING PER SERO.

G0002 MORE PAGES TO FOLLOW .

h> s://% p.tcp.dqi.goA':9o49/SENTRY/J1PPD7O.do 7/6/2012

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 63 of 79

Page 64: Doc.128

MIAGM *PAGE 001 OF 00i *

REGISTER NO: 80655-004 NAME..:FUNCTION .- : PRT FORMAT:

INMATE DISCIPLINE DATACHRONOLOGICAL DISCIPLINARY RECORD

98-02-201210:03:39

BUJDUVEANU, TRAIANCHRONO LIMIT TO MOS PRIOR TO 08-02-2012

REPORT NUMBER/STATUS.: 1943510 - SANCTIONED INCIDENT DATE/TIME: 11-13-2009 1520UDC HEADING DATE/TIME: 04-26-2010 2035FACL/UDC/CRAIRPERSON.: COL/B-3/J.BOLEYAPPRAL CASE NUMBERIS): 581756, 568228REPORT REMARKS.......: INMATE WAS SANCTIONED TO 30 DAYS LOSS OF TRULINCS. HE

ORIGIHALLY HAD 69 DAYS LOSS OF TRULINCS.

3l2 BEING INSOLENT TO STAFF MEMBER - FREQ: lLP OTHER / 30 DAYS / CSCOMP: LAW : INMATE WAA ALPAADY COMPLETED THIS SANCTION. THIS

WAS A REHAARING.

- qy REPORT < >>ER........: 1943510 (REHRAAD 04-26-2010 1035)UDC HFADING DATE/TIME: 03-09-2010 1420

REPORT NUMBER........: 1943510 (REHEARD 03-09-2010 1420)

UDC HEARING DATE/TIME: 11-16-2009 1530

G0005 TRANSACTION SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED - CONTINUE PROCESSING IF DESIRED

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 64 of 79

Page 65: Doc.128

Federal Bureau of Prisons

Privacy Im pac Assessm ent

for the

SENTRY lnmate Managem ent System

Issued by:

Sonya D. Thom pson

DepuW Assistant Diredor/clo

Reviewed by: Luke Mccorm ack, Chief Information O/icer

Departm ent of Justice

Nancy C. Libin, Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Olicer

Departm ent of JusticeApproved by:

Date approved: July 2, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 65 of 79

Page 66: Doc.128

Introduction

The Federal Bureau of Prisons protects society by confining offenders in the controlledenvironments of prisons, and community-based facilities that are safe, humane, andappropriately secure, and which provide work and other self-improvement oppodunities

to assist offenders in becoming Iaw-abiding citizens.

SENTRY is a real-time information system consisting of various applications for

processing sensitive but unclassified (SBU) inmate information and for propertymanagement. Data collected and stored in the system includes information relating tothe care, classification, subsistence, protection, discipline, and programs of federalinmates. SENTRY was developed and implemented in 1981 and continues to beupdated to reflect new requirements. SENTRY has also been modernized to take

advantage of web-based technologies.

Section 1.0 The System and the Inform ation Collected and Stored within the

system .

The following questions are intended to define the scope of the information in thesgstem, specifically the nature of the information and the sources from which it is

obtained.

1.1 W hat inform ation is to be collected?

The following information is collected in the system:

* Computation of sentence and supporting information',* Information concerning pending charges, and wanted status, including warrants',

* Information relating to notification to other federal and non-federal Iawenforcement agencies prior to the inmate's release',

* Records of the allowance, forfeiture, withholding and restoration of good time;* Information concerning present offense, prior criminal background, sentence and

parole',

* Identification data including, but not Iimited to, the following:

. Name,

* Date of birth,

* Social Security number,

. Inmate register number (also known as Federal Register Number),

. FBI number,

* District of Columbia Department of Correction (DCDOC) Number,* Immigration and Customs Enforcement (formerly Immigration and

Naturalization Service) Number,@ Driver's license (if available),. Home address,

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 66 of 79

Page 67: Doc.128

* Physical description,

. sex,

. Race,

* Religious preference,* Photographs,

* Digital image, and@ Drug testing and DNA samples, test results, and analysis records',

* Institution designation and housing assignments, including separation orders,

and suppoding information',. W ork and payroll records',* Program selections, assignments, skills assessments, and performance or

progress repods;* Prison conduct records, including information concerning disciplinary actions and

reviews, and padicipation in escapes, assaults, and disturbances',* Economic, social, and religious background, including special religious dietary

requirements',* Educational data, including industrial and vocational training;

' * Physical and mental health data;@ United States Parole Commission orders, actions and related information',* Transfer information, including dates and destinations',

* Mail and visiting records',* Release processing information',

,' * Administrative remedy-related records;

* Investigatory information', and. Referrals of non-federal inmates to Bureau custody and/or referrals of Bureau

inmates to state custody.

Records are retrievable by identifying data, including name, inmate register number, FBIY5 number, DCDOC or ICE number and/or Social Security number.

1.2 From whom is the inform ation collected?

The information is collected from persons committed to the custody of the AttorneyG eneral, including those sentenced to terms of imprisonment and those in pre-trialcustody. Information may also be colleded from federal, state, local, foreign andinternational Iaw enforcement agencies and personnel', federal and state prosecutors,courts and probation services; educational institutions', health care providers', relatives,

friends, and other interested individuals or groups in the community', former or future

employers; state, local and private corrections staft and Bureau staff and institutioncontractors and volunteers.

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 67 of 79

Page 68: Doc.128

Section 2.0 The Purpose of the System and the Information Collected and Stored

w ithin the System .

The following questions are intended to delineate clearly the purpose for which

information is collected in the system .

2.1 W hy is the inform ation being collected?

The information is collected to assist the Attorney General and the Bureau of Prisons inmeeting statutory responsibilities for the safekeeping, care and custody of incarceratedpersons. It serves as the primary record system on these individuals and includesinformation critical to the continued safety and security of federal prisons and the public.

22'',j.

W hat specific Iegal authorities, arrangements, and/or agreementsauthorize the collection of inform ation?

18 U.S.C. 4003, 4042 and 4082 authorize the BOP to manage inmates committed to thecustody of the Attorney General. The Bureau is also responsible for individuals who are

directly committed to its custody pursuant to the 18 U.S.C. 3621 and 5003 (stateinmates), and inmates from the District of Colombia pursuant to section 1 1201 ofChapter 1 of Subtitle C of Title XI of the National Capital Revitalization and Self-

Government Improvement Act of 1997 (Pub. L. 105-33', 1 1 1 Stat. 740)

2.3 Privacv Impact Analvsis: Given the amount and tyge of informationcollected, as well as the purpose, discuss what prlvacy risks wereidentified and how they were m itigated.

There is a privacy risk related to the inadvertent disclosure of sensitive information tothe persons not authorized to receive it. To mitigate this risk, staff are annually trainedon how to properly handle sensitive information. Access to the system is limited tothose persons who have an appropriate security clearance which is regularly reviewed.Information is safeguarded in accordance with Bureau rules and policy governingautomated information systems security and access. These safeguards include themaintenance of records and technical equipment in restricted areas, and the requireduse of proper passwords and user identiscation codes to access the system. Only thoseBureau personnel who require access to pedorm their official duties may access thesystem equipment and the information in the system . The data is also segregated,

Iimiting staff's ability to update inmate data unless the inmate is physicallyIocated/assigned to the local site. Data transmission is also encrypted. There is also arisk of unauthorized data modification and misuse. This risk is mitigated by enforcing

access controls and encryption (as described above) and by providing auditing of userand system administration activities.

Section 3.0 Uses of the System and the Inform ation.

The following questions are intended to clearly delineate the intended uses of theinformation in the system.

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 68 of 79

Page 69: Doc.128

3.1 Describe aII uses of the inform ation.

The information is used to manage the BOP inmate population including housingand work assignments, sentence computation and implementation, discipline, securityclassification, and program needs. See the System of Records Notice for the lnmate

Central Records System (JUSTICE/OOS), 67 FR 31371 (05-09-02), modified on 72 FR3410 (01-25-07), and soon to be further modified for a detailed list of uses.

3.2 Does the system analyze data to assist users in identilingpreviously unknown areas of note, concern, or pattern? (Sometimesreferred to as data mining.)

The system does not data mine.

3.3 How will the information collected from individuals or derived fromthe system, including the system itself be checked for accuracy?

Data from the system is used operationally each day and is *cleansedo (updated) due tofrequent use, monitoring and review. System accuracy is assured using program edit

checks to prevent data entry errors. Data entry is also Iimited by facility Iocation (i.e.users at one facility cannot enter or edit data related to an inmate Iocated at another

facility). Inmates are also free to file a request pursuant to the Privacy Act and/orthrough the BOP's Administrative Remedy Program to review accuracy of informationcontained in the system .

3.4 W hat is the retention period for the data in the system ? Has theapplicable retention schedule been approved by the National

Archives and Records Administration (NARA)?

Data is retained permanently. Records are transferred to NARA 60 years after record' creation in SENTRY or when records are no longer needed for agency use andpurposes, whichever is later. The applicable retention schedule has been approved by

NARA under (# N1-129-04-07).

3.5 Privacv Im pact Analvsis: Describe any types of controls that may bein place to ensure that inform ation is handled in accordance with the

above described uses.

Access to the system is Iimited to those persons who have an appropriate securityclearance, which is regularly reviewed. Information is safeguarded in accordance withBureau rules and policy governing automated information systems security and access.System transactions are logged and exceptions are reviewed on a routine basis. Dataedit checks are included in program code to ensure appropriate and accurate entry ofdata. Sta# are routinely trained on the use and handling of information in the system.

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 69 of 79

Page 70: Doc.128

S'ection 4.0 lnternal Sharing and Disclosure of Information within the System .

The following questions are intended tothe Depadment of Justice and with other recipients.

4.1 W ith whichshared?

define the scope of sharing both within

internal com ponents of the Depadm ent is the information

Data is shared with various Iaw enforcement components within the Department ofJustice including the FBI, USMS, EOUSA, Criminal Division, U.S. Parole Com missionand Office of Inspector General.

$

4.2 For each recipient com ponent or om ce, what information is sharedand for w hat purpose?

The offices Iisted in Section 4.1 have read access to routine information in the system,e.g. name, SSN, home address, birth date, race, sex, etc as well as other informationsuch as work and unit assignments, disciplinary record, and sentencing information.The data is shared for law enforcement and court-related purposes such asinvestigations, possible criminal prosecutions, civil court actions, or regulatory or parole

proceedings. Access to sensitive transactions (i.e. update capability) is restrictedgenerally to BOP staft although some USMS users do have the ability to Ioad inmatedata into the system as part of the transit process.

4.3 How is the inform ation transm itted or disclosed?

Information is available electronically for viewing in the system by authorized userswithin the respective agency. Data transmission is encrypted. Cedain agencies receivebatch downloads of data for integration with other automated systems. Information mayalso be printed and provided to such offices in hard copy. Hard copy information ishandled in accordance with information security policy and directives relating to thehandling of sensitive information.

4.4 Privacv Impact Analvsis: Given the internal sharinj: discuss whatprivacy risks were identised and how they were m ltlgated.

There is a privacy risk related to the inadvertent disclosure of sensitive information tothe persons not authorized to receive it. To mitigate this risk, access to the system islimited to those persons who have an appropriate security clearance which is regularlyreviewed. Users are trained as to the use of the system and information is safeguardedin accordance with BOP and DOJ rules and policy governing automated informationsystems security and access. These safeguards include the maintenance of recordsand technical equipment in restricted areas, the required use of proper passwords anduser identification codes to access the system, the use of encryption for datatransmissions, appropriately labeling hard copy materials to aled staff as to the sensitivenature of the data, storing hard copy printouts in secure, locked Iocations, and requiringauthorization to remove hardcopy materials from the workplace. Sharing of data alsoincreases the privacy risks of unauthorized access and modification and misuse.

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 70 of 79

Page 71: Doc.128

Additional mitigating controls include: data entry is only pedormed by select BOPpersonnel and individuals have the opportunity to consent to non-routine uses of the

information.

bection 5.0 External Sharing and DisclosureThe following questions are intended to define the content, scope, and authority forinformation sharing external to DOJ which includes foreign, Federal, state and Iocal

government, and the private sector.

5.1 With which external (non-DOJ) recipientls) is the informationshared?

Information is shared with federal, state, local, tribal, foreign and international Iawenforcement agencies and court officials. lnformation may also be shared with othernon-DOJ entities as permitted by the Privacy Act, including the routine uses set forth in

the aforementioned SORNS, and as othe- ise permitted by Iaw.

5.2 W hat information is shared and for what purpose?

lnformation is shared for Iaw enforcement and court-related purposes such asinvestigations, possible criminal prosecutions, civil coud actions, or regulatol or paroleproceedings, and, prior to release of an inmate, to the chief Iaw enforcement officer of

the state and Iocal jurisdiction in which the released inmate will reside, as required by18 U.S.C. 4042(b). Information is also shared for other purposes in accordance withpublished the System of Records Notice mentioned above in Section 3.1 .

5.3 How is the informatlon transm ihed or disclosed?

lnformation is available electronically for viewing in the system by authorized userswithin the respective agency. Data transmission is encrypted. Certain federal agenciesreceive batch downloads of data for integration with other automated systems inaccordance with a Memorandum of Agreement. State agencies may access the datavia an approved regional information sharing program with the Department of Justice

Law Enforcement lnformation Sharing initiative (OneDOJ). Information may also beprinted and provided to such o/ces in hard copy. Hard copy information is handled inaccordance with information security policy and directives relating to the handling of

sensitive information.

5.4 Are there any agreements concerning the security and privacy of thedata once it Is shared?

Yes. Memoranda of Agreement restrict use of the data to only authorized purposes and

do not permit further redistribution of the data.

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 71 of 79

Page 72: Doc.128

5.5 W hat Wpe of training is required for users from agencies outsideDOJ prior to receiving access to the inform ation?

Users are notified of rules and procedures regarding access to the information via aRules of Behavior document which they must sign and acknowledge.

5.6 Are there any provisions in place for auditing the recipients' use ofthe informatlon?

Memorandums of Agreements include requirements for the recipient agency to maintainan audit trail of user activities, as well as privacy and security requirements to protectthe data. System transactions are also Iogged and exception reports are routinely

reviewed.

5.7 Privacv lmpact Analvsis: Given the external sharinj, what privacyrisks were identified and describe how they were m ltigated.

There is a privacy risk related to the inadvertent disclosure of sensitive information topersons not authorized to receive it. To mitigate this risk, access to the system isIimited to those persons who have an appropriate security clearance which is regularlyreviewed. Users are trained as to the use of the system and information is safeguardedin accordance with BOP and DOJ rules and policy governing automated informationsystems security and access. These safeguards include the maintenance of recordsand technical equipment in restricted areas, the required use of proper passwords anduser identification codes to access the system, the use of encryption for datatransmissions, appropriately Iabeling hard copy materials to alert staff as to the sensitivenature of the data, storing hard copy printouts in secure, Iocked Iocations, and requiringauthorization to remove hardcopy materials from the workplace. Sharing of data alsoincreases the privacy risks of unauthorized access and modification and misuse.Additional m itigating controls include allowing only cedain BOP personnel to enter data

and allowing individuals the oppodunity to consent to non-routine uses of theinformation. External sharing of data also increases the privacy risks of unauthorizedaccess and modification and misuse. Additional mitigating controls include allowing onlycedain BOP personnel to enter data; allowing individuals the opportunity to consent tonon-routine uses of the information', and following Memoranda of Agreementrequirements regarding the security and privacy of data after it is shared.

Section 6.0 Notice

The following questions are directed at notice to the individual of the scope of

information collected, the opqortunity to consent to uses of said information, and theopportunity to decline to provlde information.

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 72 of 79

Page 73: Doc.128

6.1 W as any form of notice provided to the individual prior to collection

of information? If yes, please provide a copy of the notice as anappendix. (A notice may include a posted prlvacy policy, a PrivacyAct notice on forms, or a system of records notice publlshed in the

Federal Register Notice.) If notice was not provided, why not?

Notice was provided through the applicable System of Records Notice. (See Section3.1 above.)

6.2 Do individuals have an oppodunity and/or right to decline to provide

inform ation?

No. Information is required to be provided as part of the sentencing process, the initialintake and screening of the individual into custody, the re-admittance of the individualback into custody, or the release of the individual into the community.

6.3 Do individuals have an oppodunity to consent to padicular uses ofthe information, and if so, what is the procedure by which anindividual would provide such consent?

Individuals do not have the opportunity to consent to routine uses of the information,

e.g. disclosure to Iaw enforcement personnel, the judiciary, etc. Individuals have theopportunity to consent to non-routine uses of the information pursuant to the PrivacyAct, 5 USC Section 552a, e.g. disclosure to an academ ic institution with whom theinmate wishes to share his personal information.

6.4 Privacv lm pact Analvsis: Given the notice provided to individualsabove, describe what privacy risks were identised and how you

m itigated them .

The privacy risk identified would be the failure of persons to know their information maybe collected and what it will be used for. BOP has published a Privacy Act System ofRecords Notices for BOP's inmate central records, which covers information maintainedin SENTRY. The information in this notice includes entities with which and situationswhen BOP may share investigative records. This notice, therefore, mitigates the riskthat the individual will not know why the information is being collected or how the

information will be used.

Section 7.0 Individual Access and Redress

The following questions concern an individual's ability to ensure

information collected about him/her.

the accuracy of the

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 73 of 79

Page 74: Doc.128

8.3 Does the system use 'droles'' to assign privileges to users of thesystem ?

Role access is controlled by terminal IDs, in conjunction with user IDs and passwords.Only cedain terminals may be authorized to conduct secure web transactions (i.e.process sensitive security information).

8.4 W hat procedures are in place to determine w hich users may accessthe system and are they documented?

User access and terminal access for an employee must be requested by a supervisorindicating that access is required for the performance of their duties. The request andsubsequent access is documented in the BOP HelpDesk system .

8.5 How are the actual assignments of roles and rules verified accordingto established security and auditing procedures?

Each user's access is reviewed and recertified on an annual basis. Each terminal isalso reviewed and recertified on an annual basis. Each Memorandum of Agreementauthorizing external agency use is reviewed and reauthorized, if required, on an annualbasis.

8.6 W hat auditing measures and technical safeguards are in place toprevent misuse of data?

Sentry transactions are Iogged', exception reports are routinely reviewed by lnformationSecurity staff, who conduct follow-up investigations regarding suspicious or unusual

activity. Access to certain sensitive information or transactions (e.g. Witness Securitydata, sensitive medical data, etc.) requires specific authorization and is Iimited to certainterminals/users.

8.7 Describe what privacy training is provided to users either generallyor specifically relevant to the functionality of the program or system ?

Users are trained as to the sensitive nature of the data within the system andcontinuously reminded as to the need to strictly control the viewing and/or output of datafrom the system . BOP users are trained annually regarding the handling of sensitiveinformation and information security requirements. AIl employees who are involved inthe management, operation, program ming, maintenance, or use of a DOJ informationsystem are made aware of the threats to and vulnerabilities of those systems and theirresponsibilities with regard to privacy and information security.

AlI contractors and volunteers who access Bureau information or systems are requiredto attend initial security awareness and training during orientation. Contractors andvolunteers also receive a refresher security awareness training during annual trainingsessions. The Information Security Programs Office is responsible for providing theinformation on security requirements, procedures and configuration managementnecessary to conduct the initial briefings for all users on SENTRY. External users aretrained as to the use of the system and required to sign and acknowledge Rules ofBehavior before access is granted. Memoranda of Agreement with external agencies

11

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 74 of 79

Page 75: Doc.128

also require the appointment of an information security coordination to enforce the

security and privacy aspects of the sharing program.

8.8 ls the data secured in accordance with FISMA requirements? If yes,

when was Cedification & Accreditation Iast completed?

Yes, the data is secured in accordance with FISMA requirements. The Certification andAccreditation was Iast completed October 2008; and a recedification will occur in 2012.

8.9 Privacv lm pact Analvsis: Given access and security controls whatJprivacy risks were identified and describe how they were m itlgated.

There is a privacy risk related to the inadvedent disclosure of sensitive information tothe persons not authorized to receive it. To mitigate this risk, access to the Sentrysystem is Iim ited to those persons who have an appropriate security clearance which isregularly reviewed. Users are trained as to the use of the system and information issafeguarded in accordance with BOP and DOJ rules and policy governing automatedinformation systems security and access, e.g. screen filters are used to protect display,update transactions are only available to certain approved users, and timeout/inactivityrestrictions are in place. These safeguards also include the maintenance of recordsand technical equipment in restricted areas, and the required use of proper passwords

and user identification codes to access the system . Data transmission is also

encrypted.

Section 9.0 Technology

The following questions are direded at critically analyzing the selection process for anytechnologies utilized by the system, including system hardware, RFID, biometrics and

other technology.

9.1 W ere com peting technologies evaluated to assess and com pare their

ability to efectively achieve system goals?

At the time of its development twenty years ago, no viable alternative existed. Manycorrectional systems were using paper-based mechanisms to log and monitor theirinmate populations', others were using local or decentralized databases. The BOP hadan inmate information system but it provided no operational data and containednumerous errors. The decision was made to provide an operational, centralizeddatabase which could provide staff with accurate, real-time information concerning the

inmate population.

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 75 of 79

Page 76: Doc.128

# *

9.2 Describe how data integrity, privacy, and security were analyzed aspad of the decisions m ade for your system .

Risk management was addressed initially through a feasibility study pedormed by anoutside consultant. Development was also structured to minimize risks; the design

phase included extensive input and meetings with subject matter sta# and end-users,including the W arden's Advisory Group. Prior to full implementation, a pilot wasperformed first at one and then another institution. A Management Review wasconducted in 1980 to assess the acceptability of SENTRY to field personnel. The study

provided objective and timely input to BOP management by addressing the SENTRY ITresource requirements in accordance with SENTRY plans. Full implementation of theSENTRY system occurred in 1981. The system is being updated in 2012 to migrate toa new web-based platform and to replace outdated mainframe technology.

9.3 W hat design choices were m ade to enhance privacy?

At the time of development, the BOP considered an online system jointly supportive ofBOP, the Parole Commission, the USMS and Federal Prison Industries (FPI). Asecurity task force, which included personnel from DOJ, the National Bureau ofStandards, the Association for Computing Machinery, and BOP, determined that FPIsupport should not be integrated with SENTRY activities due to the potential for crosstalk between inmate activities and SENTRY. The Mitre Corporation performed adetailed security analysis and also recommended that FPl support come from its own

dedicated computer system.

Conclusion

Since its inception, Sentl was designed to automate resource-intensive, operationalfunctions within each institution. Each module efectively replaced extensive paperflows, therefore reducing staff time, eliminating errors, and providing for more emcient,secure operations. Any modifications or enhancements to Sentry programs continue to

follow that same design goal.

13

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 76 of 79

Page 77: Doc.128

*

EXHIBIT 9

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 77 of 79

Page 78: Doc.128

m ' 94

U.S. DEPARTMRNY OF JUSIICy FEDERAL BURKKU OF PRISONS

Name of Inmate Register Number Hearing Date

Bujduveanu, Traian 80655-004 19/29/10

è Date of Incident Date of Incident Report Prohibitedln/13/lû lQ/13/l0 Actlsl Code 108, 3Q9

Summary of Chargets Possession. manufacture or introduction of a hazardous tool / Violatin: aO .

1. NOTICE OF nRA*Gl(S)

Date Typed Name/signature DHO

A. Advance written notice of charges (copy of incident reportl was given to inmxte onl0/20/lc at 0739 by Dontallis Rende.r . ( Re4ident refused to accept a copy of

the charges when he was picked up by the US Marshals.Date Time

B. The OIr Hearing was held on 10/29/10 at l0:50am .Date Time

C. The inmate was advised of his rights before this CDC byz hahbie Low.ry

on 10/22/10 and a copy of the advisement of rights form is attached.Date

II. STAFF REPRRSENTATIVE

A. Inmate waived right to staff representative: lYee/No/NA)Heshennett who was unable to attend due to his work schedule.

Inmate requested staff representative and NF appeared.

Requested staff representative deelined or could not appear but inmate was advised o: optionto postpone hearing to obtain another staff repreeentative with the result that: Staff

e--her Angela Mnnre wa> aent ls a staff rep noa off-naer Bujduvoxnu did not r*qulst xomthlrstaff rep.

originally called for RM Corky

B.

C.

III PRESENTATION OF EVIDRHCE .A. Inmate has been advised of his right to preseat a statement or to remain silent

. to presentdocuments, ineluding written statements of unavailable witnesses, and for relevant andmaterial witnesses to appear in his behalf at the hearing . .

Inmate admits/denies the chargets) during the investigation

Summnry of Inmnte Statement:

C.1.

Witnesses:

The inmnte requested witnesses: (Y /No/NA)

1. The following persons w re cal ed as witneeses at this hearing and appeared: :ee!attaehment ((2. A summnry of testimony of eaeh is attached: (Yes/No/NA)3. The following peraons requeeted were not calT7Yefor the reasonlslgivea: â:q4. Unavailable witnesses were requested to submit written statements and those statements

were considered: .JPIY /No/NA)

D. Docu- ntary w idence : In addàtion to the ineident Report and Investigation: the Cn- ittee

consi-dered. the- f ollow. inq documents : .Th.e ..-C.% .t<*@- QnnAi4= rA-th. f nlxnwl ng.- arxnamenemz--naM'-ontation allowing offender Bujduveanu's wife to transport him and photos of the cell

phone and eharqer.

E. Confidential infor-xtion was considered by the CDC and not provided to inmate (Yes/No/NA)

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 78 of 79

Page 79: Doc.128

V

IV . FINDINGS OF THE COMMITTEE

a. The act was committed as charged. Code lQ8 aad Code 3Q9

b. The following act was eommitted:

c. No prohibited act was committed: Expunge aecording to your Statement of Work.

V . SPECIFIC ZVIDENCE RELIED ON TO SUPPORT FINDINGSYour due process righks were read and reviewed with you by the rnr Cnmmittee at the time of thehearing. You stated you understood your rights.

The CDC f-'ndmanufacture.The Cm--lttee

evidence that your behavior violated the BoP's Prohibited Act, Code 108 i.e. posseslionor intrnanction of a hazardoua too: and Code 3t9 i.e. Violating a condition of a c----q-ity program.

based its deeision oa the facts outlined in the writtea report: on 1:/13/1: I observed offenderBujduven-x walking towarde his vehielelblue Pord Rxplorer truck) in the resident parking lot. He then :pt intothe vehiele xna backed the vehiele into a parking gpaee. I asked his eaxnselor if he wa* authorized to drive nnashe atated that he was not and that his wife was authorized to transport him. A review of his file cotrnharatedthat he va* not authprized to drive. offendet Bujduveam. had driven the vehicle from h&s home to the 'acility.

His c-moelor w-nt outaide and brought offender Bujduvexml inside where we queetioned hi> about why he wasdriving without autborization. Staff explained to him that it was againlt the rules for him to operate avehicle without permission =na we search-a his vehicle. O>ring the search staf' f-*na an unauthorized cell

phone (black Motorola in offender Bujduveanu's namo) anG a black Motorola car phone charger. offender Bujduveanuis therefore in violation of eode zngtviolating a cnndition of a c---xnlty program =na code loezpossessionm-nufaeture, or introduetion ok a hazara-ls tool.

VI . SM CTION RECO- ATION Based on the above evidence the coc co- ittee rec- ends

offender Bujduveanu, Traian remain Disciplinary transferred.

VII. REASQN FOR SANCTION RECOMMRMnATION

To deter this and other inmates from committing similar acts in thefuture.

VIII. APPQAT' RIGHTS Inmnte was advised.The inmAte has been advised of the findings

, specific evidence relied on, action and reasons forthe action. The inmnte has been pdvised of his right to appeal under the Aaministrative Remed

yProcedure or by letter within 20 days of the imposition of the sanction to the Regional Director

.

A copy of this report has been given to the inmate.

IX . DISCIPLTNR COMMITTEE

Chairperson Meàber Memberi

:Galo Rugel x

X . ACTION B DHO

'

Pyped Name/3i%ndture - DSO Ditp

Ec m M

(This form may be replicated via WP)

Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2012 Page 79 of 79