Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Do we have enough evidence on the clinical need and benefit of
venous interventions?
Michael Dake, MD
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, CA, USA
Michael Dake, MD
• Research/Research Grants, Clinical Trial Support– W. L. Gore (major)– Cook Medical (major)
• Consulting Fees/Honoraria– W. L. Gore– Cook Medical – Abbott Vascular (minor)– Medtronic (minor)– Cardinal Health (minor)
• Equity Interests/Stock Option– TriVascular (minor)– Intact Vascular (minor)– Arsenal (minor)– 480 Medical (minor)– PQ Bypass (minor)– AneuMed (minor)
• Officer, Director, Board Member or other Fiduciary Role– VIVA Physicians Group
• Speaker’s Bureau– None
Within the past 12 months, the presenter or
their spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement
or affiliation with the organization listed below.
• Deep vein thrombosis and PE impose substantial economic burdens
• In a 2014 US study, 5442 DVT and 6119 PE health insurance claims and associated short- and long-term disability claims were analyzed to determine economic impact
Venous Thrombosis Complications: Societal Perspective
DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PE, pulmonary embolism
Page RL, et al. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(9):979-85.
Substantial Productivity Loss for Employees with DVT or PE
Days Lost Productivity Loss
Short-Term Claims
Long-Term Claims
Short-Term Claims
Long-TermClaims
DVT 57 days 440 days $7,414 $58,181
PE 56 days 364 days $7,605 $48,751
Note: Productivity loss and missed days associated with short-term and long term disability claims were
calculated per each disability incident
• 20-50% of patients with DVT develop PTS1,2
• Symptoms and signs:3
– Leg pain or heaviness
– Leg edema
– Redness or dusky cyanosis
– Telangiectasia
– New varicose veins
– Stasis hyperpigmentation
– Skin thickening
– Leg ulcers
Venous Thrombosis Complications: Post-Thrombotic Syndrome (PTS)
1. Kahn SR, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2008 149(10):698-707.
2. Prandoni P, et al. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125(1):1-7.
3. Kahn SR, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016;41(1):144-53
An estimated 761,697 non-fatal VTE events and 399,808 associated complications occurred across the six European countries in 2004
Cohen AT, et al; VTE Impact Assessment Group in Europe (VITAE). Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. Thromb Haemost. 2007 Oct;98(4):756-64.
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE): Annual European Estimate
Year 2004 data from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the UK
Non-fatal VTE event Chronic Complications
Deep-VeinThrombosis
Pulmonary Embolism
Post-Thrombotic Syndrome
Pulmonary Hypertension
Total Number of Community &
Hospital Acquired Events
465,715 295,982 395,673 4,135
AngioJetTM
Thrombectomy System (Boston
Scientific)IndigoTM
(Penumbra)EKOSTM
(BTG)AspirexTM
(Straub)RotarexTM
(Straub)
CatheterDirected lytic
(e.g. Angiodynamics
Uni*FuseTM)
Regulatory Approval
Mechanical Thrombectomy
CE Mark/FDAApproved to break apart and remove
thrombus
FDA -- CE Mark CE Mark --
Pharmaco-mechanical
CE Mark/FDAApproved for both
thrombectomy and infusion of
fluids (via Power Pulse™)
--FDA
Fluid infusion w/ ultrasound
-- --FDA
Pharmacologiconly
Aspiration mechanism
High speed jets inside catheter
paired with ULTRA console (-600 mm
Hg)
External vacuum pump (-
29mm Hg) None
Rotating helix produces a negative pressure and acts as the conveyor screw for the material transported
into the collecting bag
None
Maximum aspiration capacity (maximum blood loss)
60 mL/min480 mL/min
(CAT 8)--
6F: 45 mL/min8F: 75 mL/min
10F: 130 mL/min--
Indications
• Veins• Arteries• Arterio-venous
fistula grafts
Generalvasculature
Fresh, soft emboli and
thrombi
• Venous• Arterial• Pulmonary
emboli
Acute occlusions:• Veins• Arteries• Dialysis
access
• Veins• Arteries• Dialysis
access• In-stent
restenosis
Peripheral vasculature
Sources: Indigo Product Brochure; EKOS EkoSonic Instructions for Use; www.angiodynamics.com/products/UniFuse; http://www.straubmedical.com/documentation.html
Thrombectomy/Thrombolysis Devices
CAUTION: The law restricts these devices to sale by or on the order of a physician.
PEARL* Venous Registry†CaVenT‡
CDT Standard
# of Patients 329 287 90 99
# of Sites 32 63 20
Primary Treatment AngioJet Thrombectomy
With or Without PMT CDT CDT LMWH
Prior DVT 40% 31% 10% 9%
Stent Placement 35% 33% 17% NA
Primary access Popliteal Popliteal Popliteal NA
Male 57% 48% 64% 62%
Age (mean) 52.2 yrs 47.5 yrs 53.3 yrs 50.0 yrs
Treatment Location Iliofemoral – femoral pop Iliofemoral – femoral pop CFV or iliofemoral
Limbs Involved Left=62%; Right=38%
Left=61%; Right=39%
Left=60%; Right=40% Left=62%; Right=38%
CDT, catheter-directed thrombolysis; CFV, common femoral vein;
LMWH, low molecular weight heparin; PMT, pharmacomechanical thrombolysis
Results from different clinical investigations are not directly comparable.
Information provided for educational purposes only
*Garcia,MJ, et al. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26:777-785†Mewissen MW, Seabrook GR. Radiology 1999:211:39-49 ‡Enden , Haig Y. Lancet 2012:379:31-38
Study ComparisonTreatment of Lower Extremity DVT
Patient Characteristics
Study ComparisonTreatment of Lower Extremity DVT
PEARL* Venous Registry†
CaVenT‡
CDT Standard
Onset of DVT
Symptoms
Acute 67% (≤14 days) 66% (≤10 Days ) 100% ≤21 days
Chronic 33% (>14 days) 16% (>10 Days ) NA
Acute & Chronic
NA 19% NA
Primary Lytic TPA Urokinase TPA NA
CDT Drip Times (mean) 17 hrs 48 hrs 57.6 hrs (2.4 days) NA
Procedure Times
CDT (N=29)
40.9 hrs NA NA NA
CDT+PPS/RL (N=172)
22.0 hrs NA NA NA
PPS/RL (N=115) 2.0 hrs NA NA NA
Bleeding Complications4.5% (major & minor
combined)11% (major); 16% (minor)
22% (major & minor combined)
0%
CDT, catheter-directed thrombolysis; PMT, pharmacomechanical thrombolysis;
PPS, power-pulse spray; RL, rheolytic; TPA, tissue plasminogen activator
Treatment Characteristics
Results from different clinical investigations are not directly comparable.
Information provided for educational purposes only
*Garcia,MJ, et al. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26:777-785†Mewissen MW, Seabrook GR. Radiology 1999:211:39-49 ‡Enden , Haig Y. Lancet 2012:379:31-38
PEARL*Venous
Registry†
CaVenT‡
CDT Standard
% Thrombus Removal
Overall 96% 83% 89% NA
CDT (N=28) 93% NA NA
CDT+PPS/RL (N=167) 97% NA NA
PPS/RL (N=113) 95% NA NA
Acute 97% 86% 89%
Chronic 95% 68% NA
Primary Patency NA6 Month = 65%
12 Month = 60%6 Month = 65.9% 6 Month = 47.4%
Freedom from Rethrombosis6 Month= 87%
12 Month= 83%NA NA NA
*Garcia,MJ, et al. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26:777-785†Mewissen MW, Seabrook GR. Radiology 1999:211:39-49 ‡Enden , Haig Y. Lancet 2012:379:31-38
CDT, catheter-directed thrombolysis; PPS, power-pulse spray; RL, rheolytic
Results from different clinical investigations are not directly comparable.
Information provided for educational purposes only
Study ComparisonTreatment of Lower Extremity DVT
Treatment Effectiveness
Current DVT Treatment GuidelinesSummary
Meissner MH, et al. Early thrombus removal strategies for acute deep venous thrombosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery
and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(5):1449-62.
Nicolaides, A. N. et al. Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism. International Union of Angiology (IUA). Volume 32, No 2. CDER Trust,
London, UK. April 2013.
Vedantham S, et al; Society of Interventional Radiology and Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe Standards of Practice
Committees. Quality improvement guidelines for the treatment of lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis with use of endovascular thrombus removal. J
Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(9):1317-25.
• Current guidelines generally recommend anticoagulation therapy and compression stockings as first line of treatment to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism and reduce swelling
• Endovascular interventions (CDT and PMT) are currently considered for select patients who would benefit from early thrombus removal, especially those with acute iliofemoral DVT
Summary of the GuidelinesEndovascular Thrombus Removal
AVF, American Venous Forum; CDT, catheter-directed thrombolysis; IUA, International Union of Angiology; PMT, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy;
SIR, Society of Interventional Radiology; SVS, Society for Vascular Surgery
SVS/AVF- Meissner MH, et al. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(5):1449-62.
IUA- Nicolaides AN, et al. International Union of Angiology (IUA). Volume 32, No 2. CDER Trust, London, UK. April 2013.
SIR- Vedantham S, et al. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(9):1317-25.
Thrombus Removal Method Indications
PMT preferred • Acute iliofemoral DVT (IUA, SVS/AVF)
PMT/CDT- no preference
• Symptomatic iliofemoral DVT, select patients with femoral DVT (SIR)
• Limb-threatening venous ischemia due to iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (SVS/AVF, SIR)
Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy alone
• Not recommended for acute DVT (IUA)
Surgical thrombectomy • Iliofemoral DVT, if thrombolytic therapy is contraindicated
(SVS/AVF)
Do we have enough evidence on the clinical need and benefit of
venous interventions?
Michael Dake, MD
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, CA, USA