Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
dnssd WG
Chairs: Tim Chown [email protected]
Ralph Droms [email protected] IETF 89, London, 3rd March 2014
dnssd WG @IETF89
dnssd WG @IETF89 2
Note WellThis summary is only meant to point you in the right direction, and doesn't have
all the nuances. The IETF's IPR Policy is set forth in BCP 79; please read it carefully.
The brief summary:
By participating with the IETF, you agree to follow IETF processes.
If you are aware that a contribution of yours (something you write, say, or discuss in any IETF context) is covered by patents or patent applications, you need to disclose that fact.
You understand that meetings might be recorded, broadcast, and publicly archived.
For further information, talk to a WG chair, ask an Area Director, or review the following:
BCP 9 (on the Internet Standards Process)
BCP 25 (on the Working Group processes)
BCP 78 (on the IETF Trust)
BCP 79 (on Intellectual Property Rights in the IETF)
dnssd WG @IETF89 3
AgendaAdministrivia Chown/Droms 10 minutes Introduction and NoteWell Agenda bashing; blue sheets; scribe; Jabber scribe
Requirements draft Lynn/Cheshire 30 minutes <draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-01> WG discussion
What needs to be standardised? Thaler 20 minutes
Extending multicast DNS across local links Bhandari 10 minutes <draft-bhandari-dnssd-mdns-gateway-00>
Layer 2 bridging and DNS-SD Otis 10 minutes <draft-otis-dnssd-mdns-xlink-02> Hybrid Unicast/Multicast DNS-Based Service Discovery <draft-cheshire-dnssd-hybrid-01> Cheshire 10 minutes
Discussion of standardisation Chairs 15 minutes
mDNS/DNS-SD interoperability Sullivan 15 minutes <draft-sullivan-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-00> WG discussion
dnssd WG @IETF89 4
WG info
• Charter:– http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnssd/charter/
• Status pages for drafts:– http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnssd/
• Meeting materials:– https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/89/materials.html#dnssd
• Mail list:– [email protected]– To join: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd
dnssd WG @IETF89 5
Topics for this session:
• As per agenda:– Discussion of updates to Requirements draft– What needs to be standardised
• With examples drawn from proposed mechanisms
– Using Labels with DNS SD• NB. Solutions here are currently not within our charter
– Next steps
• Anything else to add?– Some discussion of ND robustness on wireless; is this a concern
for us too?– The Special Use Domain Name issue remains parked
