Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Final Report
NTRC-333 December, 2020
Digitalization of Roads Directory in the Country
Final Report
Submitted To:
National Transport Research Centre
Submitted By:
The Urban Unit
Final report Page No 3
Table of Contents
Section 1 ................................................................................................................................................. 6
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 7
Project Area ................................................................................................................................ 7
Section 2 ................................................................................................................................................. 8
Scope of the Project .............................................................................................................................. 9
TOR’s .......................................................................................................................................... 9
Aim and Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 9
Section 3 ............................................................................................................................................... 11
Project Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 12
Phase I: ...................................................................................................................................... 12
Phase II...................................................................................................................................... 13
Phase III: ................................................................................................................................... 15
Phase IV: ................................................................................................................................... 17
Phase V: .................................................................................................................................... 18
Phase VI: ................................................................................................................................... 23
Phase VII ................................................................................................................................... 25
Section 4 ............................................................................................................................................... 26
Road Classification ............................................................................................................................. 27
Rational for Universal Road Classification in Pakistan ............................................................ 27
Road Classification Systems around the World ........................................................................ 27
Existing Road Classification in Pakistan .................................................................................. 32
Comparison ............................................................................................................................... 40
Factors for Functional Classification ........................................................................................ 47
Proposed Road Classification for Pakistan ............................................................................... 48
SOP’s for Classification of Digitized Roads ............................................................................. 50
Section 5 ............................................................................................................................................... 53
Road Numbering ................................................................................................................................. 54
USA........................................................................................................................................... 54
United Kingdom ........................................................................................................................ 56
India .......................................................................................................................................... 57
Malaysia .................................................................................................................................... 57
Proposed Road Numbering ....................................................................................................... 58
Section 6 ............................................................................................................................................... 60
Final report Page No 4
Results and Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 61
District Profile ........................................................................................................................... 61
Results ....................................................................................................................................... 61
Comparison of Road Network .................................................................................................. 66
Section 7 ............................................................................................................................................... 93
Data Collection and Field Verification .............................................................................................. 94
Data Collection ......................................................................................................................... 94
Field Verification ...................................................................................................................... 98
Pictorial Evidence of Survey: ................................................................................................. 103
Survey Points across the Country ........................................................................................... 104
Secondary Data Collection...................................................................................................... 110
References .......................................................................................................................................... 115
Final report Page No 5
Acronyms
AJK Azad Jammu & Kashmir
C&W Communication and Works
DBMS Database Management System
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FATA Federally Administered Tribal Areas
GB Gilgit Baltistan
GIS Geographic Information System
KPK Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
NHA National Highway Authority
NTRC National Transport Research Centre
PGDM Punjab Geometric Design Manual
PGDRP Pakistan Geo Directory Road Portal
TPU Transport Planning Unit
UC Union Council
UK United Kingdom
USA United States of America
WGS World Geodetic Survey
Section 1 Introduction
Final report Page No 6
Section 1
Introduction
Section 1 Introduction
Final report Page No 7
Section 1
Introduction In 1974, a technical section naming National Transport Research Centre (NTRC) was established within
Planning and Development Division. It was aimed that the said section will provide much needed
Research and Development (R&D) support for planning and appraisal of transport sector projects /plans
in a coordinated and cost-effective manner. Later, NTRC was transferred to the Ministry of
Communications in November 1992. The centre serves as a Research and Development Wing of the
Communication Division and is mandated to undertake research studies in the field of Transport
Planning and Engineering so that transport projects and plans are based on planning assumptions
determined specifically for Pakistani conditions. Another aim for the establishment of the centre is to
collect and provide countrywide transport information especially in the highly fragmented sub sectors
of Roads and Road Transport.
Importantly, to date, there does not exist any robust digital database of the country road network wherein
information pertaining to various types of roads owned by spatially distinct i.e., national, provincial and
local entities is available. Correspondingly, NTRC has initiated a project titled “Digitalization of Roads
Directory in the Country”. The purpose of project is to develop a digital database of all the roads of the
Pakistan crucial for road infrastructure asset management and spatial/ regional transport related
planning. It was envisioned that the data collected through this project will not only help to collect
information of distinct road infrastructure owned by all national, provincial and local entities but serve
as a base layer for future planning. Information pertaining to alignment, length, width, were collected
and attributed to the existing National Highway Network, Provincial Highway Network, District Roads,
Feeder Roads, Municipal Roads, and Urban Roads etc.
Project Area
Project area includes all Pakistan including Punjab, Sindh, Baluchistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Gilgit
Baltistan, Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Federally Administered Tribal Areas.
Section 1 Introduction
Final report Page No 8
Section 2
Scope of the Project
Section 1 Scope of the Project
Final report Page No 9
Section 2
Scope of the Project
TOR’s
i. To develop GIS based digitized data base of road network all over Pakistan (including four
provinces, GB, AJ&K, FATA regions) using Satellite Imagery from Open Source (minimum
Scale of 1: 2,000). Road means a public path used by motorized vehicular traffic. The Bidder
must ensure provision of any licenses (if required) for the imagery in the name of NTRC.
ii. To propose a Classification System for the roads all over Pakistan after review of the global
best practices and prevailing classifications followed by National Highway Authority,
Provincial Communication and Works Department, Provincial Highways Authorities/
Departments, Local Government Departments and Development Authorities.
iii. To develop a GIS based Connected Transport Network of all road infrastructure including roads
and bridges all over Pakistan with attributes such as origin, destination, length, width, type of
road, type of construction material, directional flow, number of lanes. The network shall be in
form of a connected link and node system classified as per requirements mentioned at Serial
No (b) above. The GIS based Connected Network shall be complete in all aspects and ready to
be used for transport modelling.
iv. To develop a complete road infrastructure directory for all the roads including National
Highways, Provincial Highways, District Roads, Feeder Roads, Irrigation Roads, Municipal /
Rural Roads, Urban Roads, and bridges with unique numbers / code assigned to each road /
link. The directory shall include all attributes mentioned above at Serial No (c).
v. To verify the road infrastructure and allied attributes all over the country through field
verification. The sample size for each class of road in each of the province shall be 10% of the
Total Road length.
vi. To find out the number and length of each road under the administrative control of each public
body / road agency / department (road assets owner).
vii. To work out the tentative number of roads with the length and width in a district excluding
National Highways and Provincial Highways.
viii. In addition to required human resource, number of digitizers and surveyors along to be engaged
with their qualification shall also be mentioned in the proposal.
ix. Any other activity related with the assignment as per Client direction.
Aim and Objectives
Transferring the TORs, following objectives had been drafted for the project as desired by the NTRC;
Development of geo-database and road directory through digitization of roads spatially located
across Pakistan
Verification of digitized roads sample (10%) data across Pakistan
Integration of road features/ attributes with road spatial location
Classification of roads spatially located across Pakistan
The Urban Unit considering the TORs and identifying the objectives of the Project believes collecting
data without any query and statistical presentation is of no use; consequently, the urban unit had defined
two additional objectives of the project and furnished an android based app and a web portal/ dash board
Section 1 Scope of the Project
Final report Page No 10
free of cost to NTRC for query/ analysis purposes and its future upgradation of the road network
database. Further, Urban Unit provided training to the NTRC staff for their capacity development; thus,
strengthening NTRC regarding data collection, management and analysis. Additional Objectives
include;
Accomplish Android based field survey
Development of Web Portal
Capacity development of NTRC Staff for App and Web Portal Future Usage
Section 3 Scope of the Project
Final report Page No 11
Section 3
Project Methodology and Digitization
Section 3 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 12
Section 3
Project Methodology The methodology consisted of Seven (07) phases. The description of these phases is given in the
subsequent sections. Importantly, the work was completed accordingly. Phases include;
Phase I: Classification of Roads for Standardization of Road Assets and Assigning Unique
Numbers (ID) / Code assigned to each road / link
Phase II: Base Data Development through Digitization of Road Network @ 1:2000
Phase III: Collection of Secondary Information from relevant authorities through Android Based
evidence and Integration within Base Data
Phase IV: Quality Assurance and Integrated Node Link Network Development
Phase V: Development of Web Portal/ Dash Board for Visualization, Query, Analysis and Field
Survey Facilitation
Phase VI: Android Based Field Survey for Verification of Roads and Capacity Building of NTRC
staff to use Web Portal and Android App
Phase VII: Development of District wise Roads Records
Phase I:
Classification of Roads for Standardization of Road Assets and Assigning Unique Numbers / Code
Assigned to Each Road / Link
In Phase 1, two (2) sub-tasks were completed which included;
Classification of Roads
Presently, multiple types of road classification system are being followed by various national, provincial
and local entities/ organizations. Notably, variation not only exists with respect to organizations but
also regarding design and function too.
Review of prevailing classifications followed by relevant national and provincial authorities i.e.,
National Highway Authority, Provincial Communication and Works Departments, Provincial
Highways Authorities/ Departments, Local Government Departments and Development Authorities
was carried out. After review and study of global best practices, the existing roads were classified into
hierarchal system of roads. The classification will allow standardization of the variant nomenclature of
the roads adopted by relevant authorities as per will; thus, allowing all relevant authorities both at
national and provincial level to adopt same terminology and hierarchal system of roads. This also helped
in assigning unique codes to the roads desired by the NTRC. After classification, the whole network
was further classified as low and high type road.
Assigning Unique Numbers (ID) / Code
Each road was given a unique ID/ Code as per its attributes. The unique ID/ Code system followed a
hierarchy system wherein both alphabets and numbers were used. The ID/ Code assigned is not complex
and is easy to remember. Assignment of Unique ID/ Code helped for both asset management and
Section 3 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 13
standardization of road classes. The unique road ID’s were used for the development of geo-database
and road directory. Coding of roads is explained in depth later in this report.
Phase II
Base Data Development through Digitization of Road Network @ 1:2000
In Phase 2, openly available high-resolution satellite imagery i.e. Google Earth, Google Earth Engine
etc. was used for the digitization with high accuracy and quality assurance. All roads including
Motorways, National Highways, Highways, Primary Roads, Secondary Roads and Local Roads were
digitised all over Pakistan (including four provinces, GB, AJ&K and Islamabad regions). Digitization
scale was 1:2000. The projection system was Geographic with Spheroid and Datum as World Geodetic
Survey (WGS) 84.
Figure 3.1. High resolution satellite image (left) and digitized single carriageway sample slice (right)
Figure 3.2. High resolution satellite image (left) and digitized dual carriageway sample slice (right)
Section 3 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 14
Figure 3.3: Sample of a map with roads classification
The prepared road network was stored in manageable form within a spatial database along with all the
desired attributes.
Standard Road Symbology
A set of standard symbols and colour scheme was used for the
development of road network. The same symbology was used for
generation of all types of maps, web-based systems and android
applications. The implemented symbology is given below, which is
prominent and distinguishable on satellite imagery as well as on other
types of base layers.
Attributes
The attribute information related to road segments was linked with the spatial data. Following attributes
were entered in the shape file of Motorways, National Highways and Highways. For this purpose,
information used for each road by the relevant entity/ organization was used to translate textual location
information into spatial tables and vector data.
Province
Division
District
Road ID
Name
No. of Lanes
Carriageway
Road Class
Road Type
Traffic Flow
Flow Direction
Length
Width
Road Material
Ownership
Owner Code
Owner Class
Road Start
Road End
Section ID
Section Start
Section End
In case of primary and secondary roads where information regarding start and end of the roads/ section
was not available, nearby highways or settlements were used to define start and end-point. Likewise,
Figure 3.4: Proposed Road
Symbology
Section 3 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 15
local roads providing settlements to settlements connectivity were digitised only. The streets within
rural settlements of Pakistan were not digitized.
Digitization vs Road Material
Each type of metalled road either Asphalt or Concrete Road found at national, provincial and district
level had its own due to high reflection in imagery. In provinces where roads were clearly recognisable
having strong spectral signature due to material type were digitized as per their alignment; however, in
areas where roads were made of gravel/ shingles, best possible alignment as Illuminated by the imagery
were digitized.
Figure 3.5: High resolution satellite image of Asphalt road (left) Concrete road (middle) and Shingle road
(right)
Phase III:
Collection of Secondary Information from Relevant Authorities and Integration within Base Data
The attribute information mentioned above in section 3.2.2 was collected from the imagery. Any
missing information was collected from the relevant national and provincial departments including but
not limited to NHA, C&W departments, Local Government and Irrigation Departments, etc. and was
linked with road spatial location data in GIS environment.
Notably, Data collection was done by a team of field operators who visited each department after the
dissemination of an official letter to all the relevant departments of Pakistan by the NTRC in
coordination with the Urban Unit. Field operator used a dedicated mobile application to mark the details
of the visit. This app helped in maintaining the record of all the visits and type/ details of data collected.
In total, three visits were made to each department to gather the data. In case of non-availability of data
from the department after two visits; the third i.e., last visit was made together with the NTRC staff.
Screenshots of app used for data collection purposes is given below.
Section 3 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 16
Figure 3.6: Screenshot of Android App for Visit Report
Section 3 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 17
Phase IV:
Quality Assurance and Integrated Node Link Network Development
After the development of base data and integration of secondary information with base data, digitized
roads were checked for Quality Assurance purposes. All type of topological errors such as connectivity,
road nodes, missing lines, duplicate lines, mismatching of nodes, badly shaped lines, missing knots at
intersection, too many vertices in line, switchbacks and topological errors as overshoot, knots, loops,
undershoot and dangle, etc. were checked and corrected in GIS environment. Topology correction tools
were used to check the digitized network.
Following quality checks were applied at different stages of digitization and quality assurance process
to illuminate the spatial miscalculations as well as the human errors:
a) The line must not have overshoots or undershoot gaps
b) Must not have sliver polygon.
c) Attribute data is entered correctly
d) No Road must have zero length
e) Line Must be Single Part
f) Line Must Not Self-Overlap
g) Line Must Not Self-Intersect
Figure 3.7: Sample of topological errors (left) and after cleaning sample slice (right)
Figure 3.8: Sample slice of topological errors (must not self-intersect)
After removal of topological errors, an integrated node link network was developed that could be used
for transport modelling and assets management purposes.
Under shoot
Over shoot
After Correction
Section 3 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 18
Phase V:
Development of Web Portal/ Dash Board for Visualization, Query, Analysis and Field Survey
Facilitation
A web portal called “Pakistan Geo Directory Road Portal” was developed for visualization, query,
analysis and field survey facilitation. Pakistan Geo Directory Road Portal (PGDRP) is a web-based
system for visualizing and analysing roads data across the country. In this system, the data was
displayed in map component, graphs component and in form of tables. The system also featured a search
option where roads could easily be searched by as per attribute list mentioned i.e., as name, code, type,
length, width etc. All the roads data could be filtered through a filter panel and result displayed map,
charts and the table. The desired result displayed on the map are also printable.
Figure 3.9: Screenshot of Pakistan geo Road Directory Portal
Importantly, the system has the following features:
Total Road Length
Total length of all roads is displayed in the PGDRP web-based system. PGDRP follows the hierarchy
system of classification and displays length of various roads according to the specific class. For
example, if Punjab province is selected then total length of opted class of road is displayed only for
Punjab. Likewise, if province of KPK is selected then only KPK roads length is displayed within
PGDRP.
Section 3 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 19
Figure 3.10: Screenshot of length pane to view the road length of selected region
Road Class
Roads are classified into six major classification such as Motorway, Expressway, Highway, Primary
Road, Secondary Road and Local Road. Each class is displayed in percentage of total length in the form
of pie chart within PGDRP.
Figure 3.11: Chart showing classification of roads
Provincial Distribution
Roads length as per overall provincial distribution is also available in the PGDRP web-system. PGDRP
clearly depicts the percentage of total length in each province in the form of pie chart.
Figure 3.12: Chart showing share of roads by province
Provincial and Road Class distribution
PGDRP has the ability to display the total length of various classes of road that are available in each of
the province.
Section 3 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 20
Figure 3.13: Chart showing share of roads by province and road classification
Carriage way
Total road length of carriage way is also displayed. Further, PGDRP analysis tool is also able to
bifurcate and display entire road network into single and/ or dual carriage way. Each bifurcated type
can also be further categorized with respect to number of lanes i.e., single lane, dual lane, triple lane
and others.
Figure 3.14: Road Length by carriageway and number of lanes
Road Material
PGDRP is able to present road network data as per road material i.e., asphalt, concrete and/ or shingle
(dirt).
Figure 3.15: Road Length by road surface type
Traffic Flow
Total road length is also displayed as per traffic flow i.e., one way and/ or two way.
Figure 3.16: Road Length by directional flow
Section 3 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 21
Department Wise
PGDRP system is able to display total length of the roads owned by an organization/ entity such as
NHA, C&W, Irrigation, Development authority, Metropolitan Corporation, Municipal Corporation and
local government.
Figure 3.17: Road Length by Organization
Filter Panel
In PGDRP system, filter panel plays an important role. It allows the user to define multi criterion to
perform analysis and visualize the data. In this panel the filter for province, division, district, tehsil,
roads and road sections is given. The filter panel allows navigation through various spatial level
mentioned above and visualize results in form of maps and graphs.
Figure 3.18: Filter Panel for Navigation
Map Panel
In the map component, administrative boundary layer and roads layers are displayed on printable map.
Choropleth maps are shown to distinguish between each of the road classification.
Section 3 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 22
Figure 3.19: Map panel with different level of details
Road Data Grid
PGDRP also displays attribute information for a single road both in printable map and table format.
Query for a single road can be made both through map panel and by using filter panel. Detail of each
road such as Road Cass, Road Type, Number of Lanes, Directional flow, Ownership, Province etc., is
available.
Figure 3.20: Road data table of selected road
Section 3 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 23
Phase VI:
Android Based Field Survey for Verification of Roads and Capacity Building of NTRC Staff to
Use Web Portal and Android App
Field Verification
An Android Based Field Survey (province / region wise) was carried out, of 10% length of each class,
to verify and validate attribute information of roads. The survey application not only ensured
transparency regarding actual field verification but also helped surveyors to take a picture of the road
and note its attributes for cross-verification with secondary information available within PGDRP.
Section 3 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 24
Figure 3.21: Screenshot of android application for field verification survey
Notably, GIS based cache map was used in Android devices to identify the area. Pictures were captured
along with latitude and longitude of each area. Data was integrated within GIS based dashboard i.e.,
PGDRP and stored in PostgreSQL database. Database management system i.e., PostgreSQL database
within PGDRP helped to use, programme, develop, visualize and analyse data on the dashboard. Major
Key features of PostgreSQL database within PGDRP are:
Identification of Road
Type and Classification of Roads
Storing of electronic data into Database
Store data in offline mode
Geo-tag photos
ESRI ArcGIS cached maps
The collected data from field survey was closely monitored and verified in GIS environment. In case of
any shortcomings, the data was improved and refined accordingly.
Capacity Building
Relevant staff of NTRC was given training on the usage of Android App and Dashboard. Furthermore,
the relevant NTRC staff was trained for editing of the data base and attributes record. A user training
manual was developed for the dashboard and data usage.
Section 3 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 25
Phase VII
District Wise Roads Records Development
District wise data was developed encompassing information of various types of roads. Map of each
district of Pakistan was developed and provided. A sample map was shared with the NTRC for approval
and all maps were prepared as per the agreed format.
Figure 3.22: Sample Map of District Faisalabad Road Network
Section 4 Project Methodology
Final report Page No 26
Section 4
Road Classification
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 27
Section 4
Road Classification Classification of roads into different categories based on functionality, attributes and administration
was a pre-requisite for ensuring efficient planning, execution, maintenance, and management of road
infrastructure projects. Administrative classification i.e., bifurcation of the road network into national,
provincial and local road networks is usually done to represent the administrative levels of government
responsible for construction, maintenance and financing of the roadway i.e., the custodian of the
infrastructure.
Likewise, functional classification is done with respect to the type of service being provided by the
various segments the system. Functional classification is primarily carried out for legal planning and
enforcement whereas administrative classification is carried out for institutional purposes.
Rational for Universal Road Classification in Pakistan
Presently, multiple road classification systems are being followed by various national, provincial and
local public organizations. Consequently, there is a confusion not only among the organizations but also
within the planning standards and manuals followed by development agencies. Evidence include Ring
Road Vs Motorway, farm to market vs district or Khadim e Punjab Rural roads, etc. This confusion is
resulting in wastage of resources i.e., same type of road when constructed at provincial level has
different construction specification then to one constructed at national level. This needs to be
eliminated.
Road Classification Systems around the World
To get a global and regional view of road classification around the world and in the region, road
classification of four countries is briefly mentioned below. For global perspective, road classification
of USA and UK is briefed whereas India and Sri Lanka is taken for regional context.
United States of America
A. Arterials
Arterial are the roads that provide the fastest method of travel and typically have low accessibility
compared to non-arterials. They are typically designed for long-distance and are not as common as the
other two functional classes of roads.
Interstates
Interstates are the highest classification of Arterials and were designed and constructed with mobility
and long-distance travel in mind.
Other Freeways and Expressways
Roadways in this functional classification category look very similar to Interstates. In this classification,
directional travel lanes are usually separated by some type of physical barrier, and their access and
egress points are limited to on- and off-ramp locations or a very limited number of at-grade
intersections. Like Interstates, these roadways are designed and constructed to maximize mobility
function, and adjoining land uses are not directly served by them.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 28
Other Principal Arterials
These roadways serve major centres of metropolitan areas, provide a high degree of mobility and can
also provide mobility through rural areas. Unlike their access-controlled counterparts, abutting land
uses can be served directly. Forms of access for Other Principal Arterial roadways include driveways
to specific parcels and at-grade intersections with other roadways.
Minor Arterials
Minor Arterials provide service for trips of moderate length, serve geographic areas that are smaller
than their higher Arterial counterparts and offer connectivity to the higher Arterial system. In an urban
context, they interconnect and augment the higher Arterial system, provide intra-community continuity
and may carry local bus routes. Table 4.1 depicts various characteristics of each type of Arterial roads
in USA.
Table 4.1: Typical Characteristics of Arterial in USA
Parameters Interstate Other Freeways
& Expressway
Other Principal
Arterial Minor Arterial
Lanes 12 feet 11 - 12 feet 11 - 12 feet 10 feet - 12 feet
Inside Shoulder
Width 4 feet - 12 feet 0 feet - 6 feet 0 feet 0 feet
Outside Shoulder
Width 10 feet - 12 feet 8 feet - 12 feet 8 feet - 12 feet 4 feet - 8 feet
AADT (Rural) 12,000 - 34,000 4,000 - 18,5002 2,000 - 8,5002 1,500 - 6,000
AADT (Urban) 35,000 - 129,000 13,000 - 55,0002 7,000 – 27,0002 3,000 - 14,000
Divided/
Undivided Divided
Undivided/
Divided
Undivided/
Divided Undivided
Access Fully Controlled Partially/ Fully
Controlled
Partially/
Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
B. Non-Arterials
Collectors
Collectors serve a critical role in the roadway network by gathering traffic from Local Roads and
funnelling them to the Arterial network. Currently, all Collectors, regardless of whether they are within
a rural area or an urban area, may be sub-stratified into major and minor categories. The determination
of whether a given Collector is a Major or a Minor Collector is frequently one of the biggest challenges
in functionally classifying a roadway network.
Generally, Major Collector routes are longer in length; have lower connecting driveway densities; have
higher speed limits; are spaced at greater intervals; have higher annual average traffic volumes; and
may have more travel lanes than their Minor Collector counterparts.
Local Roads
Locally classified roads account for the largest percentage of all roadways in terms of mileage. They
are not intended for use in long distance travel, except at the origin or destination end of the trip, due to
their provision of direct access to abutting land. Bus routes generally do not run on Local Roads. They
are often designed to discourage through traffic. As public roads, they should be accessible for public
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 29
use throughout the year. Table 4.2 below shows various characteristics of each type of Non-Arterial
roads.
Table 4.2: Typical Characteristics of Non-Arterial in USA
Parameters Collectors
Local Major Collectors Minor Collectors
Lanes 10 feet - 12 feet 10 - 11 feet 8 feet - 10 feet
Inside Shoulder Width 0 feet 0 feet 0 feet
Outside Shoulder Width 1 feet - 6 feet 1 feet - 4 feet 0 feet - 2 feet
AADT (Rural) 300 - 2,600 150 - 1,110 15 - 400
AADT (Urban) 1,100 - 6,3002 80 - 700
Divided/Undivided Undivided Undivided Undivided
Access Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
United Kingdom
All United Kingdom (UK) roads (excluding motorways) fall into following four categories:
A. Special Roads (Motorways)
Special road is defined as a road on which certain types of traffic is prohibited, under the Highways Act
1980. All motorways are Special Roads, together with some high-grade dual carriageways.
B. “A” Roads
Major roads intended to provide large-scale transport links within or between areas are termed as A
Roads. An A road will generally be among the widest, most direct roads in an area, and will be of the
greatest significance to through traffic.
C. “B” Roads
B Roads intended to connect different areas, and to feed traffic between A roads and smaller roads
within the network. Notably, B roads have greater significance for connecting traffic including through
traffic but fall below A roads within UK hierarchal system of road classification.
D. Classified unnumbered “C” Roads
Smaller roads intended to make connection between unclassified roads and A or B roads are termed as
Classified Unnumbered C roads. These roads usually link a housing estate or a village with the rest of
the road network. Like ‘minor roads’ on an Ordnance Survey map; Classified Unnumbered roads have
lower significance within UK hierarchal system of road classification but are prime importance with
respect to local connectivity. Unofficially these roads are known as C roads.
E. Unclassified “U”
Local roads are intended for local traffic. The vast majority (60%) of roads in the UK fall within this
category. An Unclassified road will generally have very low significance to traffic as it provides house
to C category road accessibility.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 30
The afore-mentioned roads in particularly A and B roads are numbered to aid road users when
navigating the network i.e., A11 or A14, etc.
India
A. National Highways
National Highways constitute the primary system of road transportation in India. These are the main
highways running through length and breadth of the country connecting capitals of states, major ports,
rail junctions, industrial and tourist centres and link up with border roads and highways of neighbouring
countries. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, is responsible for the
development and maintenance of National Highways in India.
B. State Highways
State Highways together constitute the secondary system of road transportation in the country. These
roads are administered and financed by State Governments through the State Public Works Departments
(PWDs). The State Highways links National Highways with district headquarters of State, important
cities/ towns, tourist centres and regional ports.
C. District Roads
District Roads comprising of Major District Roads (MDRs), Other District Roads (ODRs) provide
connection between district and taluk headquarters with the State highways and National Highways.
These roads running within districts contribute significantly to the economy and country’s industrial
development connecting areas of production with markets and enabling movements of raw materials
and products. As per the Indian road classification system, the MDRs must have a minimum width of
15 meters with traffic density of between 5000 to 10,000 Passenger Car Units (PCUs).
D. Rural Roads
Rural Roads providing vital connections among villages and regional markets serve as a key component
of rural development as these ensure access to economic and social services, thereby generating
increased agricultural productivity, non-agriculture employment as well as non-agricultural
productivity.
E. Urban Roads
Urban Roads consist of Municipal Roads under Urban Development Departments of States and urban
towns; roads in Railway Zones; Military Engineering Services (MES) roads and Major and Minor Port
Roads.
F. Project Roads
Project Roads largely include roads built/coming under the purview of Central and State Government
agencies and departments. These include roads of Forest Departments; Irrigation Departments;
Electricity Departments; roads in coal fields and coal mines of Coal India Ltd. Roads under the plant
areas of Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL), National Mineral Development Corporation (NMDC);
Sugarcane Departments of States/UT and Border Roads Organization (BRO) fall under this category.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 31
Sri Lanka
A. Expressways
Expressways are the highest-class roads in Sri Lanka, connecting major cities and ports of country.
These roads are controlled by Ministry of Highways and Road Development Authority of Sri Lanka.
B. National Roads
National roads are second class roads in Sri Lanka and are further categorizes into two main categories
“A” and “B”. “A” class roads are those connecting major cities and “B” class roads are those connecting
major urban areas. National roads are also controlled by Ministry of Highways and Road Development
Authority of Sri Lanka.
C. Provincial Roads
Provincial roads are at third level in hierarchy of road classification in Sri Lanka. These roads are
serving as feeder routes to national highways and expressways i.e. collecting traffic from first and
second level roads of the cities. Provincial roads are also being controlled by Ministry of Provincial
Councils and Local Government.
D. Local Authority Roads
Local authority roads are the local roads of an area. These roads are not meant for long distance
traveling, except at the end and start of the traveling, due to their provision of direct access to abutting
land. They are often designed for low speed movements and accessible to public throughout the year.
E. Other Roads
There are some other roads in Sri Lanka which are not classified under any category of the roads. Such
roads are treated under the class of Other Roads. These roads are constructed for some specific purpose
and not open for public use such as road to access forests and irrigation roads being used only for
irrigation purposes. This class of roads are being controlled either by Ministry of Rural Development
(MORD), Private Company, or Agriculture Cooperative. Table 4.3 depicts Road Classification
Parameters adopted in Sri Lanka.
Table 4.3: Road Classification Parameters adopted in Sri Lanka
Type Class Description Administration Max Speed
Expressways E Connecting Major
Cities, Ports
Ministry of Highways and
Road Development RDA
80/100/120
Kph
National Roads
A
AA Connecting Major
Cities
Ministry of Highways and
Road Development RDA
20-25-30-
35 mph 32-
40-48-65
kph
AB
AC
B Connecting Major
Urban Areas
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 32
Provincial
Roads
C Major Feeder
Routes Ministry of Provincial
Councils and Local
Government - PRDA D Minor Feeder
Routes
Local Authority
Roads E Local Roads
Other Roads Not
Classified
Plantation, Forest,
Irrigation Roads
Ministry of Rural
Development (MORD),
Private Company,
Agriculture Cooperative
Set by
Administrati
on
Existing Road Classification in Pakistan
Presently, there does not exist any indigenous road classification system in Pakistan. Most of the road
development authorities in the country follow their own road classification system developed as per
their need over the time. A brief introduction of these systems is as follows;
Federal Roads
Federal roads are controlled by the Government of Pakistan and maintained by the National Highway
Authority (NHA). They are divided into 3 classes:
Motorways
Expressways
National Highways
o Strategic Highways
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 33
Figure 4.1: Map of Federal Roads
A. Motorways
Motorways of Pakistan are a network of multiple-lane, high-speed, limited-access or controlled-access
highways, which are owned, maintained and operated federally by Pakistan's National Highway
Authority (NHA). The total length of Pakistan's motorways is 1973 kms as of March 18, 2020. Around
1763 km of motorways are currently under planning/ construction in the different parts of the country.
Most of these motorway projects were completed by 2022. All Motorways in Pakistan are pre-fixed
with the letter 'M' (for "Motorway") followed by the unique numerical designation of the specific
Motorway (with a hyphen in the middle), e.g. "M-2". Table 4.4 below depicts details of various
motorways in Pakistan.
Table 4.4: Motorways in Pakistan
Name Course Length Lanes Completion
Year Status Remarks
M-1 Peshawar–
Islamabad 155 km 6 2007 Operational
M-2 Islamabad –
Lahore 367 km 6 1997 Operational
M-3
Lahore –
Abdul
Hakeem
230 km 6 2018 Under
Construction
Construction began
in December 2015.
M-4
Pindi
Bhattian –
Multan
309 km 4 2018
Sections 1, 2, 5
Operational
Sections 3, 4
Construction began
in 2009.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 34
Under
Construction
M-5 Multan –
Sukkur 387 km 6 2019
Under
Construction
Construction began
in May 2016.
M-6 Sukkur –
Hyderabad 296 km 6 2020 Proposed
Construction to begin
in 2017.
M-7 Dadu – Hub 270 km 4 TBA Proposed Proposed
M-8 Ratodero –
Gwadar 892 km 2 2017
Partially
Operational
Under
Construction
Partially operational.
M-9 Hyderabad –
Karachi 136 km 6 2017
Partially
Operational
Under
Construction
Section-1 of 75KM
Operational.
Construction began
in March 2015.
M-10
Karachi
Northern
Bypass
57 km 2 2007 Operational
Operational since
2007. Proposed 4
lane upgrade.
M-11 Sialkot –
Lahore 89 km 6 2018 Proposed
Land acquisition
underway
M-14 Hakla – Dera
Ismail Khan 280 km 4 2019
Under
Construction
Construction began
in May 2016
B. Expressways
Expressways are also a network of multiple-lane, high-speed toll highways in Pakistan, which are
owned, and maintained by the NHA. Expressways are usually upgraded versions of National
highways but differ from Motorways because of less access restrictions. The total length of expressways
in Pakistan's is 260 kms (as of February 4, 2017). All Expressways in Pakistan are pre-fixed with the
letter 'E' (for "Expressway") followed by the unique numerical designation of the specific Expressway
(with a hyphen in the middle), e.g. "E-1". Table 4.5 below depicts details of various expressways in
Pakistan.
Table 4.5: Expressways in Pakistan
Name Course Length Lane Completion
Year Status
Peshawar Northern Bypass 32 km 4 2013 Operational
E-1 Peshawar – Torkham 65 km 4 2023 Proposed
E-3 Kot Sarwar – Hafizabad –
Wazirabad 100 km 4 2020 Proposed
E-4 Faisalabad – Khanewal 103 km 4 2020 Proposed
E-5 Khanewal – Lodhran 103 km 4 2020 Proposed
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 35
E-6 Sukkur – Jacobabad 69 km 4 2020 Proposed
E-6B Ratodero – Sehwan 200 km 4 2020 Proposed
. E-35 Hazara 110 km 4 2017 Under
Construction
E-75 Islamabad – Muzzafarabad 130 km 4 2017 Partially
Operational
E-90 Besham – Khwazakhela 66 km 4 Proposed
Lahore – Nankana Sahib 66 km 4 Proposed
C. National Highways
National Highways of Pakistan consists of all public highways maintained by NHA. The total length of
nation highways in Pakistan is over 9500 kms. The highways transverse across the country provide
access to major population centres. All National Highways in Pakistan are pre-fixed with the letter 'N'
(for "national") followed by the unique numerical designation of the specific highway (with a hyphen
in the middle), e.g. "N-5". Each numerical designation is separated by five numerals, i.e. N-5, N-10, N-
15, etc. National Highways are distinct from 'Strategic Highways', which begin with the prefix 'S' and
are controlled and operated by the Ministry of Defence. Table 4.6 and 4.7 below depicts details of
various national and strategic highways in Pakistan respectively.
Table 4.6: National Highways in Pakistan
Name Course Length Lane Completion Year Status
N-5 Karachi – Torkham 1819 km 4 1952 Operational
N-10 Karachi – Gwadar 653 km 2 2003 Operational
N-15 Mansehra – Chilas 240 km 2 - Operational
N-25 Karachi – Chaman 813 km 2 - Operational
N-30 Basima – Khuzdar 110 km 2 - Operational
N-35 Hasan Abdal – Khunjerab Pass 806 km 4 1979 Operational
N-40 Quetta – Taftan 610 km 2 - Operational
N-45 Nowshera – Chitral 309 km 2 - Operational
N-50 Kuchlak – Dera Ismail Khan 531 km 2 - Operational
N-55 Kotri – Peshawar 1264 km 4 - Operational
N-65 Sibi – Sukkur 385 km 2 - Operational
N-70 Qila Saifullah – Multan 447 km 2 - Operational
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 36
N-75 Islamabad – Kohala 138 km 4 - Operational
N-80 Islamabad – Kohat 146 km 2 - Operational
N-85 Hushab – Surab 487 km 2 - Operational
N-90 Khwazakhela – Besham 64 km 2 - Operational
N-95 Chakdara – Kalam 135 km 2 - Operational
N-105 Larkana – Lakhi 61 km 2 - Operational
N-110 Gharo – Keti Bunder 90 km 2 - Operational
N-120 Hyderabad – Khokhrapar 220 km 2 - Operational
N-125 Taxila – Haripur 44 km 2 - Operational
N-155 Larkana - Mohenjo Daro 28 km 2 - Operational
N-255 Larkana - Nasirabad 34 km 2 - Operational
N-305 Sakrand - Nawabshah 35 km 2 - Operational
N-455 Larkana - Shahdadkot 50 km 2 - Operational
N-655 Ratodero – Naudero 18 km 2 - Operational
Table 4.7: Strategic Highways in Pakistan
Name Course Length Lane Completion Year Status
S-1 Gilgit – Skardu 167 km 2 1982 Operational
S-2 Kohala - Muzaffarabad 40 km 2 2016 Operational
S-3 Muzaffarabad - Chakothi 55 km 2 2010 Operational
Provincial Roads
Provincial and territorial roads are controlled by the respective provincial and territorial governments
and maintained by respective provincial Highway Authority. Unfortunately, each province uses its own
road classification system. Generally, this classification is based on type of road material used and
ownership of the road and does not refer to any global functional classification system. Table 4.8 enlists
the classification of roads adopted by each province.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 37
Table 4.8: Road Classification in Provinces of Pakistan (Bureau of Statistics)
Punjab KPK Sindh Baluchistan AJ&K GB
Provincial
Highways
R&B Sector
Farm to Market
Roads
Sugar Cess
Roads
District Council
Roads
Provincial
Highways
High Type
Low Type
High Type
Low Type
High Type
Low Type
Public Works
Dept.
Double Lane
Roads
Major Roads
Link Roads
Local
Government
Black Top
Roads
Shingle
Roads
Municipal Roads
Municipal roads are controlled by the respective District Governments or City Governments.
Punjab Geometric Design Manual
Punjab Geometric Design Manual (PGDM) developed by the Urban Unit broadly classifies roads into
two major categories based on the location of the road i.e., Urban Roads and Rural Roads as listed in
Table 4.9 and Table 4.10 respectively.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 38
D. Urban Road
Table 4.9: Urban Road Classification in Punjab Geometric Design Manual
Sr
# Classification
Geometric
Parameters Description
1
Principal Urban
Roads
(Expressway, Ring
Roads)
Dual Carriageway
Controlled Access
Free Flow
100 - 130 KPH
Synonymous with freeways, the expressways
are limited access, high speed, and divided
highways with no at grade intersections. They
are highest category of urban roads with full
access control needed to prioritize the mobility
of through traffic over access. They connect
multiple primary roads spanning across or
around the cities (ring roads), district/CBD.
They provide a rapid and safe means of
transportation between the urban and sub urban
roadway network at high speeds; and on high
quality pavements, at sections, alignments.
2
Primary Urban
Roads
(Major Collectors,
Major/Minor
Arterials)
Dual Carriageway
Limited Access
Free Unimpeded
Flow
60 - 100 KPH
Divided roads with moderate or high capacity
that falls immediately below expressways. They
provide mobility while service to the abutting
land is subordinate function. Major arterial
tends to serve major centres of activity while
carrying high traffic volumes or longest trip
lengths and joining multiple urban and sub
urban major zones across a district. They are
noted for their lack of residential entrances and
they are designed to carry traffic between
housing colonies.
3
Secondary Urban
Roads
(Minor Collector,
Collector/Distribut
er)
Single/Dual
Carriageway
Partial Access
Free Unimpeded
Flow with Occasional
Delays
50 - 60 KPH
Minor collector road is a low or moderate
capacity road which is below a highway r
arterial road. Collector road tend to lead traffic
from local roads or section of housing to activity
areas with in communities, arterial roads or
direct to express ways. Collector roads can have
many different characteristics ranging from
wide boulevard to a residential street.
4
Local Urban
Roads
(Street, Gali)
Single Carriageway
Full Access
Interrupted Flow
20 - 50 KPH
Undivided road that primarily permit direct land
access to the residential communities and
connection to the higher order streets, with
lowest level mobility. Local access roads are
designed at the low design speeds with the
intend to keep the housing societies/colonies
safe activities.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 39
E. Rural Road
Table 4.10: Urban Road Classification in Punjab Geometric Design Manual
Sr
# Classification
Geometric
Parameters Description
1
Principal Rural
Roads
(Motorways,
National
Highways)
Dual Carriageway
Controlled Access
Free Flow
100 - 130 KPH
A motorway/National Highway is designed and
built solely for motorized traffic. They are long
distance, high speed, uninterrupted (signal free)
roads providing inter-provincial mobility across a
country; and connecting important cities, ports,
and international borders. Motorways serves as a
rapid and safe means of transportation and usually
full access-controlled alignments.
2
Primary Rural
Roads
(Major Collectors,
Major/Minor
Arterials)
Dual Carriageway
Limited Access
Free Unimpeded Flow
80 - 100 KPH
They are roads linking the small cities and towns
with metropolitan cities via Motorways and
National Highways. They constitute a coherent
network supporting medium and long-distance
traffic across the province at high design speeds.
3
Secondary Rural
Roads (Farm to
Market Roads,
Collector/
Distributer)
Single/Dual
Carriageway
Partial Access
50 - 80 KPH
Minor collectors (Farm to market roads): low
capacity, low speed routes that connects various
agricultural farm to mandis, with in tehsil, via
minor arterial/major collectors.
4 Local Rural Roads
Single Carriageway
Full Access
Interrupted Flow
30 - 50 KPH
Undivided, low width, dirt, brick, semi-paved and
paved roads sometimes located along the banks of
the irrigation canals connecting villages and farms
to the rural minor collectors and minor arterials.
Transport Planning Unit (Transport Department, Punjab)
Transport Planning Unit at Transport Department made an effort to classify roads while developing
Transport Master Plan for cities of Punjab. The classification proposed by the TPU was in in line with
American Road Classification System.
Table 4.11 depicts the classification developed by TPU.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 40
Table 4.11: Road Classification Developed by TPU
Sr.
# Classification
Geometric
Parameters Description
1
Motorways/
Expressways
(Freeways)
Dual Carriageway
Access Controlled
100 - 120 KPH
2 or more lanes per
direction
Provides largely uninterrupted travel, often using
partial or full access control, and are designed for
high speeds.
2 Primary Roads
(Arterials)
Dual/Single
Carriageway
60 - 100 KPH
2 or 3 Lanes Per
direction
Provides the highest level of service at the greatest
speed for the longest uninterrupted distance, with
some degree of access control.
3 Secondary Roads
(Collectors)
Dual/Single
Carriageway
40 - 60 KPH
1 or 2 Lanes Per
direction
Provides a less highly developed level of service
at a lower speed for shorter distances by collecting
traffic from Local Roads and connecting them
with Primary Roads.
4 Tertiary Road
(Local Roads)
Single Carriageway
Max. 40 KPH
Max. 2 Lanes
Roads have the lowest speed limit, and carry low
volumes of traffic and connecting with Secondary
or Primary Roads. In some areas, these roads may
be unpaved.
The above-mentioned classification systems cannot be directly applied as they are too vague and non-
representative of prevailing conditions of road network in Pakistan. Hence, a classification system needs
to be defined that is precise, clear and suits the conditions of Pakistan; i.e., fulfilling the requirements
of all national, provincial and local public organizations.
Comparison
Table 4.12 below draw a comparison of both global and regional examples with prevailing classification
in Pakistan.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final report Page No 41
Table 4.12: Comparison of Global and Regional Road Classes with Pakistan
Proposed
Road Class
Global Regional Existing
Pakistan US UK Sri Lanka India
Motorways Arterials –
Interstates
Special
Roads Expressways
National
Highways Motorways
Expressway
Arterials - Other
Freeways &
Expressways
Special
Roads Expressways
National
Highways Expressway
Highways
1.Other Principal
Arterials
2.Minor Arterials
“A” Roads
National/
Provincial
Roads
National
Highways/
State
Highways
National
Highway,
Provincial
Highway
Primary
Roads Major Collectors “B” Roads
Local
Authority
Roads
District/
Rural
Roads
Trunk Roads
Secondary
Roads Minor Collectors
Classified
unnumber
ed “C”
Local
Authority
Roads
District/
Rural
Roads
Sugar cess Roads,
Farm to Market
Roads, District
Road
Local Roads Local Roads Unclassifi
ed “U” Other Roads
Urban
Roads
District Council
Roads, Streets,
Gali's
Table 4.13 below draw a comparison of definition used for various categories of roads by both global
and regional systems.
Table 4.13: Comparison of Road Class Definitions used globally
Road
Class USA UK Sri Lanka India
Motor-
way
Interstates are the
highest
classification of
Arterials and were
designed and
constructed with
mobility and long-
distance travel in
mind.
A road on
which certain
types of traffic
are prohibited,
under the
Highways Act
1980. All
motorways are
Special Roads,
together with
some high-
grade dual
carriageways.
Expressways are the
highest-class roads
in Sri Lanka,
connecting major
cities and ports of
country. These roads
are controlled by
Ministry of
Highways and Road
Development
Authority of Sri
Lanka.
These are the main
highways running
through length and
breadth of the country
connecting capitals of
States and UTs, major
ports, rail junctions,
industrial and tourist
centres and link up
with border roads and
highways of
neighbouring
countries. Ministry of
Road Transport &
Highways,
Government of India,
is responsible for the
development and
maintenance of NHs in
India.
Express-
way
In this classification
have directional
travel lanes are
usually separated by
some type of
physical barrier, and
their access and
egress points are
limited to on- and
off-ramp locations
or a very limited
number of at-grade
intersections. Like
Interstates, these
roadways are
designed and
constructed to
maximize their
mobility function,
and abutting land
uses are not directly
served by them.
A road on
which certain
types of traffic
are prohibited,
under the
Highways Act
1980. All
motorways are
Special Roads,
together with
some high-
grade dual
carriageways.
Expressways are the
highest-class roads
in Sri Lanka,
connecting major
cities and ports of
country. These roads
are controlled by
Ministry of
Highways and Road
Development
Authority of Sri
Lanka.
These are the main
highways running
through length and
breadth of the country
connecting capitals of
States and UTs, major
ports, rail junctions,
industrial and tourist
centres and link up
with border roads and
highways of
neighbouring
countries. Ministry of
Road Transport &
Highways,
Government of India,
is responsible for the
development and
maintenance of NHs in
India.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final Report Page No 43
Road
Class USA UK Sri Lanka India
Highway
These roadways
serve major centres
of metropolitan
areas, provide a high
degree of mobility
and can also provide
mobility through
rural areas. Unlike
their access-
controlled
counterparts,
abutting land uses
can be served
directly. Forms of
access for Other
Principal Arterial
roadways include
driveways to
specific parcels and
at-grade
intersections with
other roadways.
Major roads
intended to
provide large-
scale transport
links within or
between areas.
An A road will
generally be
among the
widest, most
direct roads in
an area, and
will be of the
greatest
significance to
through traffic
National roads are
second class roads in
Sri Lanka and are
further categorizes
into two main
categories A and B.
A class roads are
those connecting
major cities and B
class roads are those
connecting major
urban areas.
National roads are
also controlled by
Ministry of
Highways and Road
Development
Authority of Sri
Lanka. Provincial
roads are at third
level in hierarchy of
road classification in
Sri Lanka. These
roads are serving as
feeder routes to
national highways
and expressways.
They are actually
feeding traffic to
first and second
level roads o city.
Provincial roads are
being controlled by
Ministry of
Provincial Councils
and Local
Government.
These are the main
highways running
through length and
breadth of the country
connecting capitals of
States and UTs, major
ports, rail junctions,
industrial and tourist
centres and link up
with border roads and
highways of
neighbouring
countries. Ministry of
Road Transport &
Highways,
Government of India,
is responsible for the
development and
maintenance of NHs in
India. State Highways
together with major
district roads constitute
the secondary system
of road transportation
in the country. These
roads are administered
and financed by State
Governments. Through
the State Public Works
Departments
(PWDs)..The State
Highways provide
links with NHs, district
headquarters of State,
important towns,
tourist centres and
minor ports.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final Report Page No 44
Road
Class USA UK Sri Lanka India
Primary
Roads
Minor Arterials
provide service for
trips of moderate
length, serve
geographic areas
that are smaller than
their higher Arterial
counterparts and
offer connectivity to
the higher Arterial
system. In an urban
context, they
interconnect and
augment the higher
Arterial system,
provide intra-
community
continuity and may
carry local bus
routes.
Roads intended
to connect
different areas,
and to feed
traffic between
A roads and
smaller roads
on the network.
A B road will
still be of
significance to
traffic
(including
through
traffic), but less
so than an A
road
Local authority
roads are the local
roads of an area.
These roads are not
meant for long
distance traveling,
except at the end and
start of the traveling,
due to their
provision of direct
access to abutting
land. They are often
designed for low
speed movements.
These roads should
be accessible to
public throughout
the year.
District Roads
comprising of Major
District Roads
(MDRs), Other District
Roads (ODRs) provide
connection between
district and taluk
headquarters with the
State highways and
National Highways.
These roads which run
within districts
contribute significantly
to the economy and
country’s industrial
development
connecting areas of
production with
markets and enabling
movements of raw
materials and products.
As per the
classification of roads
broadly the MDRs are
to have a minimum
width of 15 meters with
traffic density of less
than 10,000 PCUs but
more than 5000 PCUs.
Rural Roads
connectivity is a key
component of rural
development, since it
promotes access to
economic and social
services, thereby
generating increased
agricultural
productivity, non-
agriculture
employment as well as
non-agricultural
productivity, which in
turn expands rural
growth opportunities
and real income
through which poverty
can be reduced.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final Report Page No 45
Road
Class USA UK Sri Lanka India
Seconda
ry Roads
Collectors serve a
critical role in the
roadway network by
gathering traffic
from Local Roads
and funnelling them
to the Arterial
network. Generally,
Major Collector
routes are longer in
length; have lower
connecting driveway
densities; have
higher speed limits;
are spaced at greater
intervals; have
higher annual
average traffic
volumes; and may
have more travel
lanes than their
Minor Collector
counterparts.
Smaller roads
intended to
connect
unclassified
roads with A
and B roads,
and often
linking a
housing estate
or a village to
the rest of the
network.
Similar to
‘minor roads’
on an Ordnance
Survey map
and sometimes
known
unofficially as
C roads. A
Classified
Unnumbered
road will be of
lower
significance
and be of
primarily local
importance, but
will perform a
more important
function than
an unclassified
road
Local authority
roads are the local
roads of an area.
These roads are not
meant for long
distance traveling,
except at the end and
start of the traveling,
due to their
provision of direct
access to abutting
land. They are often
designed for low
speed movements.
These roads should
be accessible to
public throughout
the year.
District Roads
comprising of Major
District Roads
(MDRs), Other District
Roads (ODRs) provide
connection between
district and taluk
headquarters with the
State highways and
National Highways.
These roads which run
within districts
contribute significantly
to the economy and
country’s industrial
development
connecting areas of
production with
markets and enabling
movements of raw
materials and products.
As per the
classification of roads
broadly the MDRs are
to have a minimum
width of 15 meters with
traffic density of less
than 10,000 PCUs but
more than 5000 PCUs.
Rural Roads
connectivity is a key
component of rural
development, since it
promotes access to
economic and social
services, thereby
generating increased
agricultural
productivity, non-
agriculture
employment as well as
non-agricultural
productivity, which in
turn expands rural
growth opportunities
and real income
through which poverty
can be reduced.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final Report Page No 46
Road
Class USA UK Sri Lanka India
Local
Roads
Locally classified
roads account for the
largest percentage of
all roadways in
terms of mileage.
They are not
intended for use in
long distance travel,
except at the origin
or destination end of
the trip, due to their
provision of direct
access to abutting
land. Bus routes
generally do not run
on Local Roads.
They are often
designed to
discourage through
traffic. As public
roads, they should
be accessible for
public use
throughout the year.
Local roads
intended for
local traffic.
The vast
majority (60%)
of roads in the
UK fall within
this category.
An
Unclassified
road will
generally have
very low
significance to
traffic, and be
of only very
local
importance.
There are some
roads in country not
classified under any
of the road class,
such roads are
treated under the
class of Other
Roads. These roads
are the roads
constructed for some
particular purpose
and not open for
public use such as
road to access
forests and irrigation
roads being used for
irrigation purposes
only. This class of
roads is being
controlled by
Ministry of Rural
Development
(MORD), Private
Company, and
Agriculture
Cooperative.
Urban Roads consist of
Municipal Roads under
Urban Development
Departments of States
and UTs; roads in
Railway Zones; MES
roads constructed by
Military Engineering
Services (MES) and
Major and Minor Port
Roads.
Factors for Functional Classification
Area Classification
Pakistan has a diverse demographic ranging from densely populated metropolitan cities to scarcely
populated remote villages. Urban and rural areas have fundamentally different characteristics regarding
density and types of land use, density of street and highway networks, nature of travel patterns, and the
way in which these elements are related. Consequently, areas in Pakistan are classified in three
categories based on the administrative boundaries established by Local Government Acts. They are:
a) Metropolitan Area
b) Urban Area
c) Rural Area
Access
Two major considerations in classifying highway and street network functionality are access and
mobility. The conflict between serving mobility and providing access to a dispersed pattern of trip ends
leads to differences and gradations in the various functional types. Regulated limitation of access is
needed on highways to enhance their primary function of mobility. In contrast, the primary function of
local roads is to provide access which hinders mobility. The extent and degree of access control is thus
a significant factor in defining the functional category of a street or highway. Access is a fixed need for
every area served by the highway system. Mobility is provided at varying levels of service. Mobility
can incorporate several qualitative elements, such as riding comfort and absence of speed changes, but
the most basic factor is operating speed or trip travel time.
Roadway mobility function: Provides few opportunities for entry and exit and therefore low
travel friction from vehicle access/egress
Roadway accessibility function: Provides many opportunities for entry and exit, which creates
potentially higher friction from vehicle access/egress
Figure 4.2: Relationship of Functionally Classified Systems in Serving Traffic Mobility and Land Access
Section 4 Road Classification
Final Report Page No 48
Proposed Road Classification for Pakistan
For Pakistan, roads are classified into six distinct categories according to the function they serve and
attributes they possess. A brief outline of each road class is given as following.
A. Motorways
Motorways are the high-speed roads that provide largely uninterrupted travel with controlled access,
dual carriageway and designed for high speeds typically ranging 100 – 120 KPH with restrictions on
certain vehicle types. Examples include M1, M2 etc.
B. Expressways
Expressways are multiple-lane, high-speed toll highways that are upgraded versions of National
highways but differ from Motorways by having less access restrictions.
C. Highways
Highways provide largely uninterrupted travel between cities and districts with full access and are
designed for high speeds ranging from 70 – 100 KPH. Highways can either be single or dual
carriageway. Examples include the N5, N70 and provincial highways of Punjab.
D. Primary Roads
Primary roads provide the highest level of service at moderate speeds of 60 – 70 KPH with some degree
of access control and having a dual carriageway for the longest uninterrupted distance collecting traffic
form Motorways/Highways and distributing to the Secondary Roads.
E. Secondary Roads
Provides a less developed level of service at low speed for shorter distances by collecting traffic from
Local Roads and connecting them with Primary Roads and vice versa. Speed ranges from 40 – 60 KPH
and roads can be either single or dual carriageway.
F. Local Roads
Roads have the lowest speed limit and carry low volumes of traffic and connecting with secondary or
primary roads. Typically, these roads are single carriageways with speeds not exceeding more than 40
KPH and in some areas, these roads may be unpaved. Examples include farm to market roads, streets,
galis.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final Report Page No 49
Table 4.14: Classification of roads based on its functionality along with its attributes
Sr.
No. Classification
Spatial
Level Sub Class Carriageway Access Speed Travel Lane Examples
1 Motorways Regional Dual Fully
Controlled
100 - 120
KPH
2 or More Per
Direction
M1, M2, M3 (NHA),
Ring Road Lahore
2 Expressways Regional Ring Roads Dual Partial
Controlled
80 – 110
KPH
2 or More Per
Direction
E35, E75 (NHA),
Ring Road Lahore,
Karachi
3 Highways Regional
1. Provincial
Highways,
2. National
Highways
Single/Dual Fully
Access
70 - 100
KPH
Up to 2 Per
Direction
N5, Jhang-
Faisalabad Road,
Lahore Sargodha
Road
4 Primary Roads
Urban
Major Collectors
Major Arterials
Minor Arterials
Single/Dual Partial
Controlled
60 - 70
KPH
Up to 3 Per
Direction
Jail Road Lahore,
Canal Road
Faisalabad
5 Secondary Roads
Regional/
Urban/
Rural
Minor Collectors Single/Dual Fully
Access
40 - 60
KPH
1 or 2 Per
Direction
Davis Road Lahore,
Rural Paved Roads
connecting villages
to Primary Roads
6 Local Roads Urban/
Rural
Farm to Market
Roads
Streets
Galis
Single Fully
Access
Max. 40
KPH
Max. 2 lane
both
Directions
KPRRP/Village
Roads, Urban streets
etc.
Section 4 Road Classification
Final Report Page No 50
SOP’s for Classification of Digitized Roads
Based on the afore-mentioned proposed classification, following defined SOP’s were employed for
classifying the exiting road network of Pakistan.
Table 4.15: SOP’s for classifying road network
Road Class Metropolitan Area Urban Area Rural Area
Motorways
Typically, it does not exist
within metropolitan
boundary
Typically, it does not
exist within Urban
boundary
Roads that are multiple
carriageways, fully
controlled, having at least
two lanes per direction
and connecting multiple
cities (at least two major
cities) and classified by
NHA as Motorways
Expressway
Dual carriageway and
controlled roads such as ring
road/bypass classified as
Express way by NHA
Dual carriageway and
controlled roads such as
ring road/bypass
classified as Express
way by NHA
Roads that are dual
carriageway, controlled,
having at least two lanes
per direction and
connecting multiple cities
and classified by NHA as
Expressway
Highways
Typically, it does not exist
metropolitan boundary
except ring road/bypass if it
is connecting highways.
Typically, it does not
exist urban boundary
except ring road/bypass
if it is connecting
highways.
Roads that are either
single or dual
carriageway, fully
accessed and connecting
multiple cities (at least
two major cities)
Primary
Roads
Roads that are dual
carriageway, partially
controlled (with service
roads) and having at least
two lanes per direction.
Roads that are dual
carriageway and having
at least two lanes per
direction
Roads that are dual
carriageway and having at
least two lanes per
direction and not fulfilling
requirement of highways
Secondary
Roads
Roads that are dual
carriageway and fully
accessed.
In dense areas, roads that are
single carriageway having
greater road width than local
roads and connecting under
laying area with primary or
secondary road.
Single carriageway
roads having road width
greater than local roads
and connecting under
laying area with
primary or secondary
road.
Single carriageway roads
having road width greater
than local roads.
Connecting under laying
area with expressways,
highways or secondary
road. Connecting more
than two populated areas
(Villages).
Section 4 Road Classification
Final Report Page No 51
Local Roads
Roads that are single
carriageway with width no
more than 6 meters.
All service roads along
primary roads, highways,
and expressways
Roads that are single
carriageway with width
no more than 6 meters.
All service roads along
highways and
expressways
Roads that are single
carriageway with width no
more than 4 meters
All service roads
Section 5 Road Classification
Final Report Page No 52
Section 5 Road Classification
Final Report Page No 53
Section 5
Road Numbering
Section 5 Road Numbering
Final Report Page No 54
Section 5
Road Numbering A road code or a number is an identifying unique alpha-numeric code assigned to a roadway to
distinguish it from other roads. The selected road can also indicate its functional and administrative
classification, geographical location (in zonal numbering systems) and/or orientation i.e. north-south
and east-west. The allocated road code/numbers can be used administrative purposes by the departments
or for the informative purpose by indicating it on roadside signage as well as in maps. Internationally,
many countries have adopted a systematic road numbering system with some notable systems briefly
explained below.
USA
There are two national-level road numbering systems, the older United States Numbered Highway
System laid out in 1920s, and the newer Interstate Highway System started in the 1950s. Additionally,
every state in the U.S. maintains its own set of numbered state highways. Some states have other
systems as well, either a system of numbered county highways or secondary state highways.
Interstate Highways:
The Interstate Highway System, indicated by a red and blue shield with white
numbers, is a system of entirely freeways. The numbers are based on a grid,
with east–west routes bearing even numbers and north–south routes bearing
odd numbers. Numbers increase towards the Northeast e.g. I-5 is on the West
coast, I-95 on the East coast. Auxiliary interstates connect to the primary ones
and have 3 digits: 290 connects to 90. In general, Three-digit Interstates are,
generally, either beltways or spurs of their parent Interstates. The first digit of
the three digits usually determines whether a route is a bypass, spur, or beltway. The last two digits are
derived from the main Interstate Highway. For example, Interstate I-510 is a spur into the city of New
Orleans, Louisiana, and is connected to Interstate I-10).
US Highways/ US Routes:
The two-digit U.S. Routes follow a simple grid, in which odd-numbered routes
run generally north-south and even-numbered routes run generally east-west.
Routes proceed from low even numbers in the north to high even numbers in
the south, and from low odd numbers in the east to high odd numbers in the
west. Three-digit numbers are assigned to spurs of one or two-digit routes. The
first digit indicates the spur and the last two digits are derived from main
highway.
Section 5 Road Numbering
Final Report Page No 55
Special Routes:
A special route of the United States Numbered Highway System is a route that
branches off a U.S. Highway in order to divert traffic from the main highway.
Special routes are distinguished from main routes by, in most cases, the addition
of an auxiliary plate that describes what type of route it is, while the main
highway carries no such sign. In some locations, a single letter is placed after
the route number to denote the special route type in lieu of the auxiliary plate.
Among members of the road geek community, these routes are often called
auxiliary or bannered U.S. Highways.
Types of special Routes:
There are four main types of special routes — alternate, business, bypass, and temporary; though other
route types exist.
Alternate routes exist where an additional road is needed to meet traffic demands. They are to
be of equal character and quality compared to the main road.
Business routes carry traffic through the central business district of a community while the
main highway goes around the community.
Bypasses serve the opposite purpose of business routes. Truck routes are a subset of bypasses.
Temporary routes complete a gap between two segments of main highway that exists because
the main highway has not been fully constructed.
Table 5.1: Road numbering for US highway and special routes
Roads Highway Numbering
US Highways/Route US nn
Special Routes
Alt. US nn
Bus. US nn
Byp. US nn
Scenic US nn
Spur US nn
Temp. US nn
Truck US nn
State Highways
Every state has a state highway system with varying standards, capacity, and
quality. Some state highways become so heavily travelled they are built to
Interstate Highway standards. Many state highway markers are designed to
suggest the geographic shape of the state or some other state symbol such as its
flag. Most of the others are generically rectangular or some other neutral shape.
However, the default design for state highway markers is the circular highway
shield, which is how state highways are designated on most maps.
Section 5 Road Numbering
Final Report Page No 56
County Highways
The lowest administrative level in some states is the county highway. As the
name suggests, this type of road is maintained by a county. County roads vary
widely from well-travelled multilane highways to dirt roads into remote parts
of the county. There numbering system vary from state to state and county to
county.
United Kingdom
In UK, roads are given a single letter representing the road classification and a subsequent number of 1
to 4 digits. Numbers are based on a zoning system in which UK is divided into specific zones. Whole
UK is divided into nine zones that are
i. Zone 1: North of the Thames, east of the A1 covering Greater London, Essex, Cambridgeshire,
East Anglia, Lincolnshire, parts of Yorkshire, Cleveland, Tyne and Wear, Northumberland,
parts of the Scottish Borders, East Lothian and on up to Edinburgh
ii. Zone 2: South of the Thames, east of the A3 covering part of Surrey, Sussex and Kent
iii. Zone 3: North/West of the A3, south of the A4 covering part of Surrey, Hampshire (excluding
Portsmouth), the Isle of Wight and South West England
iv. Zone 4: North of the A4, south/west of the A5 covering the south and West Midlands,
Oxfordshire, Bristol, Gloucestershire, Buckinghamshire and south, west and Mid Wales.
v. Zone 5: North/East of the A5, west of the A6, south of the Solway Firth/Eden Estuary covering
North Wales, North Midlands, western Leicestershire, Cheshire, Cumbria and western
Lancashire. In Central London, the A40 (Holborn Viaduct, Holborn, High Holborn and Oxford
Street) provides a border between the 4 and 5 zones east of Marble Arch. The original A5 (now
renumbered A5183) also provides such a border, and north of St Albans the original A6 (now
renumbered A1081) provides an Eastern border.
vi. Zone 6: East of the A6 and A7, west of the A1 covering eastern Lancashire, North East England,
Yorkshire, Nottinghamshire, eastern Leicestershire and Rutland, and the Scottish Borders and
Lothians. Between St Albans and Luton, the original A6 (now renumbered A1081) provides
the Western border of the 6-zone.
vii. Zone 7: North of the Solway Firth/Eden Estuary, west of the A7, south of the A8 covering
Dumfries and Galloway, Ayrshire and Central Scotland
viii. Zone 8: North of the A8, west of the A9 covering Highland and the Western Isles
ix. Zone 9: North of the A8, east of the A9 covering North East Scotland, Orkney and Shetland
As per adopted numbering system in UK, the first digit in the number of any road should be the number
of the furthest-anticlockwise zone entered by that road. For example, the A38 road, being a trunk road
running from Bodmin to Mansfield starts in Zone 3, and is therefore numbered with an A3x number,
though it passes through Zones 4 and 5 and end in Zone 6.
Motorways
The motorways are marked by M and then followed by number based on the principle zone boundary,
for example M1. Two-digit numbers are used for spurs of motorways connecting another A category
Road or a motorway.
Section 5 Road Numbering
Final Report Page No 57
A-Class Roads
These roads may have one, two, three or four digits designation. These roads are marked with letter A
and followed by the zone number and the next digit locates them radially clockwise from the single
digit route. Single digit numbers reflect the traditionally most important radial routes. Starting with the
A1 which heads due north, numbers were allocated sequentially in a clockwise direction.
Further are two-digit codes which are routes that may be slightly less important, but may still be
classified as trunk routes, although many of these routes have lost a lot of their significance due to
motorway bypasses, or the upgrading of other A-roads. These routes are as far as possible follow the
general principle that their number locates them radially clockwise from the associated single digit
route. The system continues to three and four-digit numbers which further split and criss-cross the
radials. Lower numbers originate closer to London than higher numbered ones.
B-Class roads
B roads are numbered collector routes, which have lower traffic densities than the main trunk roads, or
A roads. This classification has nothing to do with the width or quality of the physical road, and B roads
can range from dual carriageways to single track roads with passing places. B roads follow the same
numbering scheme as A roads, but almost always have 3- and 4-digit designations. Many 3-digit B
roads outside the London area are former A roads which have been downgraded owing to new road
construction; others may link smaller settlements to A roads.
Other Roads
Other Roads designated as C, D and U (Unclassified) roads, are although numbered but it is done purely
for the benefit of the local authorities who are responsible for maintaining them, and the numbering is
arbitrary and does not, or should not, appear on any public signage. These other classified roads,
however, are taken into account when planning officers deal with certain planning applications,
including the creation of a new vehicular access onto a highway. The broad classification of C, D and
U roads is Unclassified.
India
In India, all north-south oriented highways have even numbers increasing from the east to the west and
all east-west oriented highways have odd numbers increasing from the north to the south. All major
Highways are single digit or double digit in number where as Three-digit numbered highways are
secondary routes or branches of a main highway. The secondary route number is prefixed to the number
of the main highway. For example, 144, 244, 344 etc. are the branches of the main NH44. Suffixes A,
B, C, D etc. are added to the three-digit sub highways to indicate very small spin-offs or stretches of
sub-highways
Malaysia
All expressways (classified as an expressway by the Malaysian government) has a route number
beginning with 'E', followed by a number. (e.g. E1 North–South Expressway Northern Route). Whereas
all federal roads can have any route number except those stated below. Industrial roads have a four-
digit route number beginning with '3'. Roads build by the Federal Land Development Authority has a
four-digit route number starting with '1' or '2'. Institutional facilities roads follow the normal numbering
Section 5 Road Numbering
Final Report Page No 58
of federal roads. All state roads begin with a letter other than 'E', followed by a number where each state
has a specific code usually the first later but there are exceptions. Local or city roads are not numbered.
Proposed Road Numbering
Keeping in consideration road numbering systems used around the world and prevailing conditions in
Pakistan, a tailor-made numbering system is proposed that incorporates existing road numbering used
by various agencies and proposed a new system for the roads without any codes. As explained in this
report earlier, Motorways, Expressways and National Highways already have a road number that is
widely used for planning purposes and for information to the public/ commuters. However, provincial
highways of all the provinces are missing a logical numbering system. For this purpose, a tailor-made
incremental directional system is proposed based on the review of system used globally in USA,
Germany and many other countries. Importantly, the numbering system is following the natural terrain
and geography of Pakistan that run from North to South and East to West. The system for each type of
road is explained below;
Motorways, Expressways and National Highways
All Motorways, Expressways and National Highways follow the existing system adopted by NHA. The
NHA system is an incremental sequential system.
Provincial Highways
Likewise, a Provincial Highway within each province followed the incremental directional system
running North to South and East to West. All Provincial Highways running North to South were given
odd number whereas those running East to West were given even number. Consequently, a highway
running from North to South and located in east of the province has the lowest number whereas a
highway running in same direction but located in West side of province has greater number.
In summary, following rules were used for road numbering of provincial highways, primary roads and
secondary roads.
Roads with odd numbers run north-south.
Roads with even numbers run east-west.
For north-south roads, the lowest numbers shall be in the East.
For east-west roads, the lowest numbers shall be in the North.
Each code to be used will have a combination of alphabets and.
For provincial highways, proposed code shall be combination of alpha-numeric. The first part
of code shall be alphabets i.e., name of the province whereas the second part shall be three-digit
numbers as per its running direction and location discussed above.
For primary roads, proposed code shall be combination of alpha-numeric. The first part of code
shall be alphabets i.e., name of the district in which the road is located whereas the second part
shall be three-digit numbers as per its running direction and location discussed above.
For secondary roads, proposed code shall be combination of alpha-numeric. The first part of
code shall be alphabets i.e., name of the district in which the road is located whereas the second
part shall be four-digit numbers as per its running direction and location discussed above.
Section 5 Road Numbering
Final Report Page No 59
For local roads, proposed code shall be combination of alpha-numeric. The first part of code
shall be alphabets i.e., name of the district in which the road is located whereas the second part
shall be five-digit numbers as per its running direction and location discussed above.
Table 5.2 below depicts the unique numbering system proposed for the project. Importantly, the data
base for the project to be prepared have both proposed unique numbering and the prevailing codes
defined by relevant organizations.
Table 5.2: Proposed Road Numbering System
Sr. # Road Class Prefix Number Number Example Purpose
1 Motorway M Single
Tier N/A M1, M2
Asset
Management /
Signage
2 Expressway E Two
Tier
Three Digits for
Intra-City
expressways
E1, E75,
E105
Asset
Management /
Signage
3 National
Highway N
Single
Tier N/A N5, N75
Asset
Management /
Signage
4 Provincial
Highway
Province
Code
Two
Tier
Three Digit Road
Number
S102, P109,
K230, B257
Asset
Management /
Signage
5 Primary
Roads
District
Code
Two
Tier
Three Digit Road
Number LHR 123
Asset
Management /
Signage
6 Secondary
Road
District
Code
Two
Tier
Four Digit Road
Number SKP3123
Asset
Management
7 Local Road District
Code
Two
Tier
Five Digit Road
Number SGD14561
Asset
Management
Section 6 Road Numbering
Final Report Page No 60
Section 6
Results and Analysis
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 61
Section 6
Results and Analysis This section presents the results of the digitization process compiled in district profiles.
Moreover, comparison of existing road statistics and NTRC road directory of each province of
Pakistan is also being done and findings are given in this section. The provinces have been
analysed by comparing road lengths in each district.
District Profile
A district profile comprises of the highlights of the district area such as population, area, and total road
network. It also includes the regional connectivity of the area and the road classification with respect
to:
Number of lanes
Carriageway type
Traffic flow
Road material
Number of road infrastructure
The district profile are prepared for all the districts of Pakistan and arranged by Province. District
Profile and district maps are attached at Annex-A and Annex-B respectively.
Results
All roads of the country were digitized with high accuracy and quality assurance. . All roads
including Motorways, National Highways, Highways, Primary Roads, Secondary Roads and
Local Roads were digitised all over Pakistan (including four provinces, GB, AJ&K and
Islamabad regions). Results shows that Pakistan has a total road network of 493,088 km.
Following graphs shows total lengths of road network in each province in Pakistan including
AJ&K, Gilgit Baltistan and Islamabad.
Expressway Highways Local RoadMetroRoad
MotorwaysNationalHighways
PrimaryRoad
SecondaryRoad
Total 225 18577 373772 77 2337 9662 2318 86119
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
Len
gth
(km
)
Total Road Length in Pakistan
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 62
Azad Jammu AndKashmir
Balochistan Gilgit Baltistan ICT Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Punjab Sindh
Total 10634 45640 6429 5994 58129 276632 89631
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
Len
gth
(km
)
Total Road Length in Pakistan
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 63
Punjab
Punjab has a total road of 276,632 km. Following graph shows the road lengths (km) with respect to
the road classification.
Sindh
Sindh has a total road of 89,631 km. Following graph shows the road lengths (km) with respect to the
road classification.
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Expressway Highways Local RoadMetroRoad
MotorwayNationalHighways
PrimaryRoad
SecondaryRoad
Total 96 10606 215103 46 1418 1736 1247 46379
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
Len
gth
(km
)
Punjab
Expressway Highways Local Road Metro Road MotorwayNationalHighways
PrimaryRoad
SecondaryRoad
Total 20 2934 67592 13 436 1854 769 16013
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
Len
gth
(km
)
Sindh
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 64
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (including districts previously administered under FATA) has a total road of
58,129 km. Following graph shows the road lengths (km) with respect to the road classification.
Balochistan
Balochistan has a total road of 45,640 km. Following graph shows the road lengths (km) with respect
to the road classification.
Gilgit Baltistan
Gilgit Baltistan has a total road of 6,429 km. Following graph shows the road lengths (km) with respect
to the road classification.
Expressway Highways Local Road MotorwayNationalHighways
PrimaryRoad
SecondaryRoad
Total 88 2333 40863 100 1814 112 12819
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
Len
gth
(km
)
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Highways Local Road MotorwaysNationalHighways
Primary RoadSecondary
Road
Total 1481 34347 377 3517 72 5847
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
Len
gth
(km
)
Balochistan
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 65
Azad Jammu & Kashmir
Azad Jammu & Kashmir has a total road of 10,634 km. Following graph shows the road lengths (km)
with respect to the road classification.
Islamabad
Islamabad has a total road of 5,994 km. Following graph shows the road lengths (km) with respect to
the road classification.
Highways Local Road National Highways Secondary Road
Total 360 3481 631 1956
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Len
gth
(km
)Gilgit Baltistan
Expressway Highways Local Road Metro Road Motorway
Total 20 83 5378 18 6
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Len
gth
(km
)
AJ&K
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 66
Comparison of Road Network
Comparison of existing road statistics gathered through published stats is done with the
digitised road directory of each province of Pakistan. The comparison has been shown in
graphical and chart form below
Punjab
Overall, it can be seen that the length of digitized road by NTRC is more than the existing road network
by C&W in all districts.
Expressway Highways Local RoadMetroRoad
MotorwayNationalHighways
PrimaryRoad
SecondaryRoad
Total 20 83 5378 18 6 41 106 342
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Len
gth
(km
)Islamabad
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 67
- 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000
Attock
Bahawalnagar
Bahawalpur
Bhakkar
Chakwal
Chiniot
Dera Ghazi Khan
Faisalabad
Gujranwala
Gujrat
Hafizabad
Jhang
Jhelum
Kasur
Khanewal
Khushab
Lahore
Layyah
Lodhran
Mandi Bahaudin
Mianwali
Multan
Muzaffargarh
Nankana Sahib
Narowal
Okara
Pakpattan
Rahim Yar Khan
Rajanpur
Rawalpindi
Sahiwal
Sargodha
Sheikhupura
Sialkot
Toba Tek Singh
Vehari
Dis
tric
tsPunjab
NTRC Published Data
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 68
2,408
4073
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Attock
3,762
11591
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Bahawalnagar
3,226
9637
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Bahawalpur
2,671
8534
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Bhakkar
2,519
4094
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Chakwal
1,327
4835
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Chiniot
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 69
2,121
6547
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Dera Ghazi Khan
2,457
17433
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Faisalabad
2,869
8122
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Gujranwala
3,532
6146
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Gujrat
1,689
4939
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Hafizabad
2,158
6768
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Jhang
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 70
1,411
1691
1,250
1,300
1,350
1,400
1,450
1,500
1,550
1,600
1,650
1,700
1,750
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Jhelum
2,893
8092
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Kasur
2,750
8485
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Khanewal
2,167
4954
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Khushab
1,310
14124
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Lahore
2,668
9534
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Layyah
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 71
1,061
5316
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Lodhran
2,134
5838
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Mandi Bahaudin
2,048
4905
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Mianwali
3,024
10605
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Multan
2,243
7968
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Muzaffargarh
1,951
4089
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Nankana Sahib
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 72
1,295
5467
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Narowal
2,584
7973
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Okara
1,467
6444
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Pakpattan
4,277
11369
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Rahim Yar Khan
1,419
6234
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Rajanpur
3,645
10078
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Rawalpindi
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 73
1,444
8317
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Sahiwal
5,742
10943
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Sargodha
1,701
10452
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Sheikhupura
1,918
6935
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Sialkot
2,107
6639
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Toba Tek Singh
3,363
7459
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Vehari
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 74
Sindh
Overall, it can be seen that the length of digitized road by NTRC is more than the Published road
network in all districts.
- 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000
Badin
Dadu
Hyderabad
Jacobabad
Jamshoro
Kambar Shahdadkot
Kashmore
Khairpur
Larkana
Matiari
Mirpur Khas
Naushahro Feroze
Sanghar
Shaheed Benazirabad
Shikarpur
Sukkur
Tando Allahyar
Tando Muhammad Khan
Tharparkar
Thatta
Umer Kot
Dis
tric
ts
Sindh
NTRC Published Data
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 75
1,314
4652
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Badin
977
2240
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Dadu
362
8029
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Hyderabad
548
2489
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Jacobabad
467
2164
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Jamshoro
687
3104
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Kambar Shahdadkot
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 76
357
3205
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Kashmore
2,717
4745
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Khairpur
1,058
2973
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Larkana
296
1573
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Matiari
889
4164
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Mirpur Khas
701
3642
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Naushahro Feroze
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 77
1,566
5094
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Sanghar
888
3958
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
Published Data NTRCLe
ngh
t (k
m)
Shaheed Benazirabad
634
2791
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Shikarpur
773
2866
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Sukkur
411
1796
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Tando Allahyar
547
2061
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Tando Muhammad Khan
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 78
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Overall, it can be seen that the length of digitized road by NTRC is more than the existing road network
by C&W in all districts.
1,162
4651
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Tharparkar
1,175
2861
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Thatta
1,006
2827
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Umer Kot
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 79
- 2,000 4,000 6,000
Abbottabad
Bannu
Batagram
Buner
Charsada
Chitral
Dera Ismail Khan
Hangu
Haripur
Karak
Kohat
Kohistan
Lakki Marwat
Lower Dir
Malakand PA
Mansehra
Mardan
Nowshera
Peshawar
Shangla
Swabi
Swat
Tank
Tor Ghar
Upper Dir
Dis
tric
tsKPK
NTRC Published Data
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 80
541
2601
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Abbottabad
795
1758
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Bannu
622
895
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Batagram
141
1473
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Buner
411
2573
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Charsada
1,442
1162
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Chitral
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 81
1,158
4326
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Dera Ismail Khan
419
966
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Hangu
386
2287
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Haripur
337
1010
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Karak
516
2128
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Kohat
418
543
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Kohistan
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 82
492
1779
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Lakki Marwat
743
2521
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Published Data NTRCLe
ngh
t (k
m)
Lower Dir
501
891
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Malakand PA
915
1774
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Mansehra
781
2274
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Mardan
521
4312
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Nowshera
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 83
421
4000
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Peshawar
284
531
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Shangla
626
2610
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Swabi
999
968
950
955
960
965
970
975
980
985
990
995
1,000
1,005
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Swat
305
637
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Tank
235
343
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Tor Ghar
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 84
741
774
720
730
740
750
760
770
780
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Upper Dir
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 85
Balochistan
Overall, it can be seen that the length of digitized roads by NTRC is more than the existing road network
by C&W in all districts.
- 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500
Awaran
Barkhan
Chagai
Dera Bugti
Gwadar
Jaffarabad
Jhal Magsi
Kachhi
Kalat
Kharan
Khuzdar
Kohlu
Lasbela
Loralai
Mastung
Musakhel
Nasirabad
Panjgur
Pishin
Quetta
Sibi
Sohbatpur
Zhob
Ziarat
Dis
tric
ts
Balochistan
NTRC Published Data
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 86
1,806
1148
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Awaran
766
1156
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Barkhan
2,163
1863
1,700
1,750
1,800
1,850
1,900
1,950
2,000
2,050
2,100
2,150
2,200
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Chagai
1,091
1340
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Dera Bugti
1,325
1825
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Gwadar
1,808
1932
1,740
1,760
1,780
1,800
1,820
1,840
1,860
1,880
1,900
1,920
1,940
1,960
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Jaffarabad
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 87
1,094
630
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Jhal Magsi
1,211
936
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Kachhi
2,212
1783
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Kalat
2,395
942
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Kharan
2,867
2355
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Khuzdar
1,350
905
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Kohlu
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 88
2,509
1745
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Lasbela
1,326
1862
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Loralai
1,440
1739
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Mastung
490
568
440
460
480
500
520
540
560
580
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Musakhel
1,201
1624
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Nasirabad1,886
850
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Panjgur
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 89
1,940
3065
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Pishin
1,958
2363
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Quetta
977
749
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Sibi
18
892
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Sohbatpur
1,505
1533
1,490
1,495
1,500
1,505
1,510
1,515
1,520
1,525
1,530
1,535
1,540
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Zhob
827
824
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Ziarat
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 90
Azad Jammu and Kashmir
Overall, it can be seen that the length of digitized road by NTRC is more than the existing road network
by C&W in all districts.
- 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000
Bagh
Bhimber
Hathian Bala
Haveli
Kotli
Mirpur
Muzaffarabad
Neelum
Poonch
Sudhnoti
Dis
tric
tsAJ&K
NTRC Published Data
1,064
1176
1,000
1,020
1,040
1,060
1,080
1,100
1,120
1,140
1,160
1,180
1,200
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Bagh
743
1181
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Bhimber
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 91
251
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Hathian Bala
384
368
355
360
365
370
375
380
385
390
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Haveli
1,756
2691
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Kotli
1,153
1278
1,080
1,100
1,120
1,140
1,160
1,180
1,200
1,220
1,240
1,260
1,280
1,300
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Mirpur
1,419
1074
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Muzaffarabad
189
391
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Neelum
Section 6 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 92
Gilgit Baltistan
Following graph shows the digitized roads in each district in Gilgit Baltistan.
1,250
1427
1,150
1,200
1,250
1,300
1,350
1,400
1,450
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)Poonch
774
798
760
765
770
775
780
785
790
795
800
Published Data NTRC
Len
ght
(km
)
Sudhnoti
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Astore
Diamer
Ganche
Ghizer
Gilgit
Hunza
Kharmang
Nagar
Shigar
Skardu
Lengths (km)
Dis
tric
ts
Gilgit Baltistan
Section 7 Results and Analysis
Final Report Page No 93
Section 7
Data Collection and Field
Verification
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 94
Section 7
Data Collection and Field Verification
Data Collection
For the purpose of data collection, an android mobile application was developed to collect data of all
distinct road infrastructure owned by all national, provincial and local entities. The purpose of this
application was to visit these governing bodies and to meet the members of these departments to
facilitate the data collection process. The record of departments is built-in in the application and the
location of surveyor is marked using GPS. The surveyor uses the application to take a picture of the
department, the designated person, and enters information regarding the survey such as:
Province
Department name
Name of meeting person
Visit number
Visit date
Visit detail
Response of data collection
Comments
An instruction manual of this application is attached on Annexure-C.
Figure 7.1: User interface of data collection application
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 95
Main Attributes
The attributes used in this application are entirely based on the response of the meeting person. The
attributes incorporated in the application are:
Province
Department name
Name of meeting person
Visit number
Visit date
Visit detail
Response of data collection
Comments
A. Province
In this section, there is a built-in list of provinces of Pakistan and the surveyor selects one in which
they are going to conduct survey.
Figure 7.2: Province drop down menu
B. Department name
This section allows the surveyor to select one of the built-in departments of selected province for the
purpose of data collection.
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 96
Figure 7.3: Department drop down menu
C. Name and Designation of Meeting Person
This section allows the surveyor to manually enter the name of the focal person. Up to 4 names
can be entered. It also allows to enter the designation of the person.
Figure 7.4: meeting person information
D. Visit Number and Date
This section allows the surveyors to enter the number of times they have visited, and the date of visit of
a particular department.
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 97
Figure 7.5: Visit number and date
E. Visit Detail and Response
In this section, the surveyors can enter the details of the visit such as the reason of visit, or the type of
data required.
In the response section, if the surveyor selects “yes” then the surveyor automatically moves to the
comments. But if they select “No” then a new tab of “reason” is displayed in which the surveyor has to
give reasons of not acquiring the data.
Figure 7.6: Visit detail and response by meeting person
F. Comments:
This is the last tab of the application in which after acquiring the data, the surveyor comments on the
collected data such as type of data, data acquired whether in soft or hard form, useful data or not?
After giving the comments, the response is saved and recorded.
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 98
Figure 7.7: Comment section
Field Verification
For the purpose of field verification, an Android mobile application was developed, the purpose of
which was to verify and validate attribute information of roads. The survey application intended to carry
out field verification by ensuring transparency, and also allowed the surveyors to take a picture of the
road and note its attributes for cross-verification with secondary information available within PGDRP.
The sample size of the data was 10% of total road length in each province. The application incorporated
GPS location of the user to identify the road during the survey
The application provides a user friendly interface with easy instructions given on the main menu. The
user can select the following before starting the survey.
Province
Division
District
Road Class
Road Name
Point
An instruction manual of this application is attached on Annexure-D.
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 99
Figure 7.8: Main menu of field verification application
Main Attributes
Attributes are the primary characteristics of a road which help in distinguishing it from other road types.
They are usually visible from the road surface and can help in the classification of the road. The
attributes were included in the verification app:
Road material
Road class
Road width
Type of carriageway
Number of lanes
Type of directional flow
Owner of road
Custodian verification
A. Road Material
Road material is the type of material which has been used to construct the pavement. The application
included:
Asphalt
Concrete
Shingle
Brick
Other
B. Road Class
It depicts the classification of road based on its accessibility and mobility. The application included:
Local road
Primary road
Secondary road
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 100
Highway
National highway
C. Road Width
It is the width of the carriageway in a road excluding the shoulders (if any). It is usually measured using
fibre glass tape. The application had an option to manually enter the measured road width.
D. Type of Carriageway
This is the dedicated path for travelling of vehicles. It is usually single or dual. Single means an absence
of median and dual means presence of median. The application included both single and dual
carriageway as an option.
E. Number of lanes
It is the number of lanes present on the carriageway of the road. The width of a lane usually ranges from
3.3m to 3.65m. They are indicated by marking white strips at regular intervals on the road surface (if
more than one). The application had the option of indicating lanes on road whether it is single or dual
or so on.
F. Directional Flow:
It is the directional flow of traffic on a road whether it is one way or two way. The application included
both of these option.
G. Owner and custodian of road:
This depicted the regulatory body which operated the road which was surveyed. The application
included NHA and C&W as an option.
Figure 7.9: Main attributes of the verification app
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 101
Web Portal:
A Survey monitoring dashboard called “NTRC data verification” was developed for visualization,
query, and analysis and field survey facilitation. It is a web-based system for visualizing and analysing
roads data across the country. In this system, the data is displayed in graphs component. The system
also features a search option where roads could easily be searched by as per attribute list mentioned i.e.,
as name, code, type, length, width etc. All the roads data can be filtered through a filter panel and result
displayed map, charts and the table. The desired result which are displayed on the map are also printable.
Figure 7.10: NTRC data verification web portal
Components of Web Portal
The web portal can be explained by briefly describing each component of the portal. The portal consists
of the following components:
Top panel
Filter panel
Map panel
Attribute panel
Graphs and charts
A. Top Panel
The top panel consists of the NTRC Data verification logo followed by a red strip which shows the total
number of verified and unverified survey points. Beneath this strip, the panel shows the information
about any selected area from the filter panel. It gives information about the total number of points in
the selected region, the total verified points, and the remaining points to be verified.
Figure 7.11: Top panel of web portal
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 102
B. Filter Panel
This panel allows the user to enter data for filtering the survey points based on province, division,
district, road classification and type.
Figure 7.12: Filter panel of web portal
C. Map Panel
This panel allows the user to see visually see the filtered points from the filter panel. It contains a map
of Pakistan on which all the survey points are marked.
Figure 7.13: Map panel of web portal
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 103
D. Attribute Panel
This panel displays the information about the selected point such as province, district, road ID,
road class, images of the road and also the surveyor name.
Figure 7.14: Attribute panel of web portal
E. Graph and Charts
This section shows the progress of each province and the different road types.
Figure 7.15: Progress graph of survey
Pictorial Evidence of Survey:
Surveyors took pictures during the survey in order to facilitate the documentation of the survey report.
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 104
Figure 7.16: Field verification survey photos
Survey Points across the Country
The total length of each road class was used to determine the sample size of points to be surveyed. A
10% sample size was used to determine the number of survey points. Each province had different
number of districts and number of points. The number of points were determined by calculating 10%
of road length of each province. Each point covered 2km of the road length.
KPK:
KPK had a total of 38 districts and 813 points to be surveyed including regions of FATA.
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 105
Table 7.1: KPK survey points
Sr No.
Districts
Points to be Verified - Road Class Wise Total
Expressways
Motorways
National Highwa
ys
Highways
Primary
Roads
Secondary Roads
Points to be
Surveyed
Khyber Pakhtun Kha
1 Bannu 0 0 1 4 0 19 24
2 Batagram 0 0 2 0 0 8 10
3 Buner 0 0 0 0 0 17 17
4 Charsada 0 1 0 6 1 27 35
5 Chitral 0 0 4 0 0 20 24
6 DI Khan 0 0 9 7 0 43 60
7 Hari Pur 2 0 5 0 0 38 45
8 Kohat 0 0 4 2 0 33 40
9 Lakki Marwat
0 0 4 4 0 16 23
10 Lower Dir 0 0 3 0 0 11 14
11 Malakand PA
0 0 2 0 0 18 21
12 Nowshehra 0 3 4 1 0 27 34
13 TourGarh 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
14 Hangu 0 0 0 4 0 15 19
15 Karak 0 0 3 0 0 23 26
16 Kohistan 0 0 5 0 0 16 21
17 Mansehra 0 0 12 0 0 37 50
18 Shangla 0 0 4 0 0 18 22
19 Swabi 0 1 0 2 2 26 31
20 Swat 0 0 7 0 0 27 34
21 Tank 0 0 0 1 0 11 13
22 Upper Dir 0 0 4 0 0 26 30
23 Mardan 0 0 2 0 2 41 45
24 Peshawar 2 1 3 1 1 40 48
25 Abbotabad 0 0 2 1 0 37 41
26 Bajour Agency
0 0 0 2 0 22 24
27 FR Lakki Marwat
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 FR Bannu 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
29 FR Peshawar
0 0 0 0 0 1 1
30 Khyber Agency
0 0 0 0 0 3 3
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 106
31 Kurrum Agency
0 0 0 0 0 8 8
32 Mohammand Agency
0 0 0 0 0 5 5
33 Orakzai Agency
0 0 0 0 0 4 4
34 South Waziristan
0 0 0 0 0 13 13
35 FR Kohat 0 0 1 0 0 2 3
36 FR Tank 0 0 0 0 0 6 6
37 FR DI Khan
0 0 3 0 0 0 3
38 North Waziristan
0 0 0 0 0 11 11
Punjab:
Punjab had a total of 36 districts and 3072 points to be surveyed.
Table 7.2: Punjab survey points
Sr No.
Districts
Points to be Verified - Road Class Wise Total
Expressways
Motorways
National
Highways
Highways
Primary
Roads
Secondary Roads
Points to be
Surveyed
Punjab
1 Attock 0 3 8 19 1 83 113
2 Chakwal 0 4 0 19 1 85 108
3 Jhelum 0 1 3 8 0 48 61
4 Rawalpindi 3 4 5 18 3 107 139
5 Bahawalpur 0 0 4 25 4 102 135
6 Bahawalnagar 0 0 0 25 1 109 134
7 Rahim Yar Khan
0 0 8 10 1 114 132
8 Gujranwala 0 0 4 12 2 56 74
9 Gujrat 0 0 3 4 1 55 63
10 Hafizabad 0 4 0 11 0 52 67
11 Mandi Bahauddin
0 0 0 10 0 46 56
12 Narowal 0 0 0 4 1 55 60
13 Sialkot 0 0 0 13 2 47 62
14 Khanewal 0 1 4 15 1 122 142
15 Multan 0 3 5 14 4 72 97
16 Lodhran 0 0 2 11 0 65 79
17 Vehari 0 0 0 19 1 61 81
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 107
18 Lahore 2 1 3 1 18 61 85
19 Kasur 0 0 3 5 2 72 81
20 Sheikhupura 0 5 1 15 1 39 62
21 Nankana Sahib
0 0 0 6 1 22 28
22 Sahiwal 0 0 5 7 2 42 55
23 Okara 0 0 2 8 2 66 79
24 Pakpatan 0 0 0 11 1 48 60
25 Sargodha 0 4 0 36 2 91 134
26 Bhakkar 0 0 0 20 0 57 78
27 Khushab 0 0 0 26 1 44 70
28 Mianwali 0 0 0 19 1 57 76
29 Faisalabad 0 4 0 35 8 95 141
30 Chiniot 0 0 0 16 1 37 53
31 T.T Singh 0 2 0 16 1 44 62
32 Jhang 0 0 0 25 0 60 85
33 DG Khan 0 0 15 0 1 57 73
34 Muzaffargarh 0 0 3 31 1 74 109
35 Rajanpur 0 0 10 3 0 51 64
36 Layyah 0 0 0 11 0 63 74
Sindh:
Sindh had a total of 29 districts and 1058 points to be surveyed.
Table 7.3: Sindh survey points
Sr No.
Districts
Points to be Verified - Road Class Wise Total
Expressways
Motorways
National Highwa
ys
Highways
Primary
Roads
Secondary Roads
Points to be
Surveyed
Sindh
1 Larkana 0 1 5 3 0 20 29
2 Matiari 0 0 3 3 0 4 11
3 Shahdadkot
0 3 4 6 0 27 40
4 Dadu 0 0 5 3 0 40 47
5 Sukkur 0 1 4 1 0 26 33
6 Malir 0 4 2 0 1 41 48
7 Hyderabad 0 0 2 3 3 15 24
8
Tando Muhammad Khan
0 0 0 5 0 16 21
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 108
9 Karachi Central
0 0 0 0 6 9 15
10 Kashmore 0 0 4 0 0 14 18
11 Khairpur 0 0 4 16 0 54 74
12 Sujawal 0 0 0 6 0 29 35
13 Tando Allahyar
0 0 2 6 0 7 15
14 Karachi West
0 2 1 0 8 19 29
15 Korungi 0 0 0 0 3 8 12
16 Karachi South
0 0 0 0 11 7 18
17 Thatta 0 2 11 3 0 41 56
18 Jamshoro 0 3 9 1 1 29 42
19 Nausharo Feroze
0 0 4 1 0 27 33
20 Sanghar 0 0 0 15 0 44 59
21
Shaheed Benazirabad
0 0 5 4 1 40 51
22 Jacobabad 0 0 2 0 0 20 22
23 Shikarpur 0 0 8 1 0 36 45
24 Badin 0 0 0 10 0 42 52
25 Mirpur Khas
0 0 2 11 0 31 43
26 Umer Kot 0 0 7 3 0 30 40
27 Tharparkar 0 0 0 15 0 62 77
28 Karachi East
0 1 0 0 11 11 23
29 Ghotki 0 0 0 0 0 0 46
Baluchistan:
Baluchistan had a total of 36 districts and 524 points to be surveyed.
Table 7.4: Baluchistan survey points
Sr No.
Districts
Points to be Verified - Road Class Wise Total
Expressways
Motorways
National Highwa
ys
Highways
Primary
Roads
Secondary Roads
Points to be
Surveyed
Baluchistan
1 Barkhan 0 0 2 0 0 3 5
2 Dera Bugti 0 0 0 1 0 8 9
3 Harnai 0 0 0 0 0 5 5
4 Kachhi 0 0 8 0 0 7 15
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 109
5 Killa Abdullah
0 0 4 0 0 12 16
6 Kohlu 0 0 0 0 0 8 8
7 Loralai 0 0 7 2 0 13 22
8 Mastung 0 0 8 3 0 10 21
9 Musa Khel 0 0 2 0 0 2 4
10 Nushki 0 0 6 0 0 0 6
11 Sherani 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
12 Sibbi 0 0 1 0 0 8 9
13 Zhob 0 0 3 4 0 3 10
14 Ziarat 0 0 0 9 0 6 15
15 Quetta 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
16 Pishin 0 0 0 0 0 0 26
17 Chagai 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
18 Killa Saifullah
0 0 0 0 0 0 24
19 NasirAbad 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
20 Jaffarabad 0 0 0 0 0 0 24
21 Jhal Magsi 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
22 Kalat 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
23 Khudzar 0 0 0 0 0 0 38
24 Lasbela 0 0 0 0 0 0 34
25 Kharan 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
26 Washuk 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
27 Awaran 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
28 Panjgur 0 0 0 0 0 0 26
29 Turbat 0 0 0 0 0 0 27
30 Gwadar 0 0 0 0 0 0 18
31 Sohbat Pur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Azad Jammu and Kashmir:
AJK had a total of 10 districts and 194 points to be surveyed.
Table 7.5: AJK survey points
Sr No.
Districts
Points to be Verified - Road Class Wise Total
Expressways
Motorways
National Highwa
ys
Highways
Primary
Roads
Secondary Roads
Points to be
Surveyed
Azaad Jammu Kashmir
1 Kotli 0 0 0 6 0 31 37
2 Poonch 0 0 0 2 0 31 33
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 110
3 Bagh 0 0 0 2 0 14 16
4 Bhimber 0 0 0 5 0 16 21
5 Hattian 0 0 0 0 0 6 6
6 Haveli 0 0 0 0 0 14 14
7 Mirpur 0 0 0 6 1 15 22
8 Muzafarabad
0 0 0 0 0 17 17
9 Neelum 0 0 0 0 0 12 12
10 Sudhnoti 0 0 0 0 0 16 16
Gilgit:
Gilgit had a total of 10 districts and 145 points to be surveyed are shown in
Table 7.6: Gilgit survey points
Sr No.
Districts
Points to be Verified - Road Class Wise Total
Expressways
Motorways
National Highway
s
Highways
Primary
Roads
Secondary Roads
Points to be
Surveyed
Gilgit Baltistan
1 Astore 0 0 0 0 0 13 13
2 Diamir 0 0 9 0 0 8 16
3 Nagar 0 0 3 0 0 8 11
4 Ganche 0 0 0 0 0 17 17
5 Ghizar 0 0 0 9 0 8 17
6 Gilgit 0 0 4 4 0 8 16
7 Hunza 0 0 8 0 0 3 12
8 Kharmang
0 0 0 0 0 9 9
9 Shigar 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
10 Skardu 0 0 0 9 0 23 31
Secondary Data Collection
Another component of field verification is the secondary data collection from various
departments i.e. such as Planning and Development Department, Communication & Works
Department, Irrigation Department and Local Government & Rural Development in each
province. Secondary data collection from government departments included the information
of types of roads, lengths of roads, widths of the roads etc. Total 29 departments were
identified and 25 departments were visited for secondary data collection.
Web Portal
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 111
A web portal called “NTRC: Data collection system” was developed for visualization,
query, analysis and field survey facilitation. It is a web-based system for visualizing and
analysing departmental data collection process across the country. In this system, the data is
displayed in map component, graphs component and in form of tables. The system also
features a search option where departments and visits could easily be searched by as per
attribute list mentioned i.e., as person name, visit date, visit number. All the departmental
data can be filtered through a filter panel and result displayed map, charts and the table. The
desired result which are displayed on the map are also printable. An instruction manual of
this portal is attached on Annexure-E
Figure 7.17: NTRC data collection web portal
Components of web portal
The web portal can be explained by briefly describing each component of the portal. The portal
consists of the following components:
Top panel
Filter panel
Map panel
Attribute panel
Graphs and charts
A. Top Panel
The top panel consists of the NTRC Data collection logo, beneath this is the panel which shows the
information about the total number of departments required to be visited and the total number of
departments which have been visited till date. It gives information about the total number of visits made
in the selected region, the data received from departments, and the non- visited departments.
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 112
Figure 7.18: Top panel of web portal
B. Filter Panel
This panel is used to filter the provincial department for data collection and the number of visits made.
Figure 7.19: Filter panel of web portal
C. Map Panel
After filtering the departmental visits, the filtered data is displayed on the map panel. The data is actually
shown on the map of Pakistan indicating as a proof that the visit was made at the location.
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 113
Figure 7.20: Map panel of web portal
D. Attributes Panel
The attribute panel shows the information about the visits made to the respective departments of each
province. The data which is entered in the mobile application during survey is recorded and shown in
this panel.
Figure 7.21: Attribute panel of web portal
E. Graphs and charts:
This section displays the overall progress of the data collection phase in the form of charts,
table and graph. The total number of visits made to departments, response of each department
and the remaining departments to be visited can be visually seen in this panel.
Section 7 Data Collection and Field Verification
Final Report Page No 114
Figure 7.22: Graphical view
Figure 7.23: Line graph view
Figure 7.24: Tabular view
Final Report Page No 115
References 1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2004). A policy on
geometric design of highways and streets. Washington D.C.: American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials.
2. Highway Functional Classification: Concepts, Criteria and Procedures, US Department of
Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
3. Guidance on Road Classification and the Primary Route Network, Department of Transport,
United Kingdom & Statistical Release, Department for Transport
4. Basic Road Statistics of India 2015-16, Government of India Ministry Of Road Transport And
Highways Transport Research Wing
5. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Washington, DC: Federal Highway
Administration
6. Weingroff, Richard F. (November 18, 2015). "From Names to Numbers: The Origins of the
U.S. Numbered Highway System". Federal Highway Administration retrieved from
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/numbers.cfm
7. Marshall, Chris. In Depth – Road Numbers – How it happened. CBRD. Retrieved from
http:/www.cbrd.co.uk/indepth/roadnumbers/ history.shtml
8. https://sites.google.com/site/roadnumberingsystems/home/countries/malaysia
9. Shah Alam Bandaraya Anggerik Part 2: Kenali sistem kod jalan perbandaran Shah Alam. Blog
Jalan Raya Malaysia. Retrieved 15 May 2016. http://blogjalanraya.blogspot.my/ 2013/02/shah-
alam-bandaraya-anggerik-part-2.html
10. Road numbering systems, https://sites.google.com/site/roadnumberingsystems/home/
countries/india
11. Vuchic, V. R. (2007). Urban transit systems and technology. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Son