54
Evaluation of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses Camysha H. Wright, MD, Resident Matthew Ryan, MD, Faculty Advisor The University of Texas Medical Branch Department of Otolaryngology Grand Rounds Presentation June 7, 2006

Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

  • Upload
    hangoc

  • View
    229

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Evaluation of Congenital

Midline Nasal Masses Camysha H. Wright, MD, Resident

Matthew Ryan, MD, Faculty Advisor

The University of Texas Medical Branch

Department of Otolaryngology

Grand Rounds Presentation

June 7, 2006

Page 2: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Outline

Embryology of the nose

Dermoid cysts

Glioma

Encephalocele/Meningocele

Evaluation of Nasal Mass

Imaging Studies

Surgical Intervention

Conclusion

Page 3: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Embryology

The critical period in nasal development is in

first twelve weeks of fetal development

Abnormalities of development are believed to

cause gliomas, dermoids, and encephaloceles

Page 4: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Embryology

Neural tube develops

between the third and

fourth week of gestation

Closure of the neural

tube occurs from the

midline and extends

cranially and caudally

Neural tube then gives

rise to neural crest cells

Page 5: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Embryology

As the neural tube closes neural

crest cells migrate anteriorly and

laterally around the eyes to the

frontonasal process

Nose formed from the medial and

lateral prominence and

invagination of the nasal pit

Page 6: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Embryology

In most of the body neural crest cells are

involved in ectodermal components, in the face

the primary role is in the formation of

mesenchymal cells

Bone, cartilage, and muscles of the face are all

derivatives of neural crest cells

Page 7: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Embryology

Nose develops from

frontonasal processes

and 2 nasal placodes

Medial processes fuse

Nasomaxillary groove

becomes the

nasolacrimal duct

Page 8: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Embryology

Scanning electron

micrograph

Page 9: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Embryology

During formation of skull base and nose, mesenchymal structures are formed from several centers which will eventually fuse and ossify.

Before their fusion, there are recognized spaces which are important in the development of congenital midline nasal masses

Fonticulus frontalis

Prenasal space

Foramen cecum

Page 10: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Embyrology

Fonticulus frontalis – space

between the frontal and nasal

bones

Eventually fuses with foramen

cecum to create a separation

between intracranial and

extracranial structures

Prenasal space is between the

nasal bones and the nasal

capsule (precursor of the

septum and nasal cartilages)

Page 11: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Pediatric Anatomic Considerations

Neonates can suffer from respiratory distress with nasal

obstruction

Pediatric airway differs from adults in that neonates are

nasal breathers

Epiglottis abuts nasal surface of the soft palate forming

anatomic divide between the airway and digestive tracts

Food from oral cavity is shunted laterally into

esophagus via the pyriform sinuses

Neonates can functionally eat and breathe concurrently

Page 12: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Pediatric Airway

Page 13: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Nasal Masses

Differential Diagnoses

Inflammatory lesions (abscess)

Traumatic deformity

Benign neoplasms (polyps, JNA)

Malignant neoplasms (rhabdomyosarcoma)

Congenital masses (teratomas, hemangiomas)

Page 14: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Nasal Dermoids

Can occur as cyst or sinus

Most common congenital midline nasal mass

1-3% of all dermoids

10% dermoids of head and neck

Page 15: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Nasal Dermoid

Has ectodermal and mesodermal components

(ectodermal components only – epidermal cyst, ectoderm,

mesoderm and endoderm - teratoma)

May present as midline nasal pit, fistula, or infected

mass anywhere from glabella to columella

Sometimes presents as single cutaneous tract with hair

at opening

May secrete pus or sebaceous material

Page 17: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Nasal Dermoid

CNS connection variably reported (4-45%)

Associated congenital anomalies (5-41%), however not

found to be associated with syndromes

Aural

atresia

Mental

retardatio

n

Spinal

column abn

hydrocephalus Hypertelorism

Hemifacial microsomia

albinism Corpus

callosum

agenesis

Cerebral

atrophy

Lumbar lipoma Dermal cyst of

the frontal lobe

Coronary artery

anomaly

Cleft

lip/palate

Tracheo-

esophagea

l fistulas

Cardiac

anomalies

Genital

anomalies

Cerebral

anomalies

Page 18: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Nasal Dermoid

Complications:

Intermittent inflammation

Abscess

Osteomyelitis

Broaden nasal root

Meningitis

Cerebral abscess

Page 20: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Dermoid Cyst

Development

During development a projection of dura projects

through the foramen cecum and attaches to skin

Dura normally separates from nasal skin and retracts

through foramen cecum losing connection

If skin maintains attachment to underlying fibrous

tissue, nasal capsule, or dura ,epithelial elements may

be pulled into the prenasal space with or without

dural connection

Page 21: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Dermoid Cyst Development

Page 22: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Glioma

Glial cells in a connective tissue matrix

Firm, noncompressible

Red or bluish lump

Can be found at glabella, at nasomaxillary suture, intranasally

No connection with subarachnoid space

Do not enlarge with crying

Do not transilluminate

May have telangiectasias

Page 24: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Glioma

Extranasal - 60%

Intranasal - 30%

Both - 10%

Dural connection - 35% intranasal, 9%

extranasal

Overall 15% dural connection

CSF rhinorrhea, meningitis possible, if dural

connection exists

Page 25: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Glioma – Formation Hypotheses

Similar to that of nasal dermoids

Develop from extracranial rests of glial tissue

Abnormal closure of fonticulus nasofrontalis

Another theory is that they are possibly

encephaloceles which have lost CSF connection

Page 26: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Glioma Development

Page 27: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Encephaloceles

Extracranial herniation of meninges and/or

brain

Connection with subarachnoid space

Rare at 1:35,000 births

30-40% associated anomalies:

microcephaly, hydrocephalus, microopthalmia,

anopthalmia, agenesis of the corpus callosum,

porencephaly, cortical atrophy, ventricular dilations

Page 28: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Encephaloceles

Bluish, soft, compressible, transilluminate, pulsatile

Enlarge with crying

Positive Furstenberg test (enlarge with bilateral compression of internal jugular veins)

Originate medially in the nose (cannot pass probe medially to this mass, versus with glioma generally can as they originate laterally often)

May have associated CSF leak

Page 29: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Encephaloceles

Large nasal encephalocele

Page 30: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Encephaloceles

Divided into three categories:

Occipital 75%

Sincipital 15%

Basal 10%

Sincipital-anterior or frontonasal (dorsum of nose, orbits, forehead)

Basal-intranasal mass, nasopharynx, posterior orbit because they herniate through the cribiform plate or posterior to it (potential for airway obstruction in neonate)

Page 31: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Encephaloceles

Basal Encephaloceles

Transethmoidal-through cribiform plate into middle meatus

Sphenoethmoidal-extends through cranial defect between posterior ethmoids and sphenoid to nasopharynx

Transsphenoidal-presents in nasopharynx

Sphenomaxillary-through superior and inferior orbital fissures to sphenomaxillary fossa

Page 32: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Encephalocele

Development

Dural projection through fonticulus nasofrontalis

Abnormal closure results in herniated

meninges/brain

May be closely related to glioma

Page 33: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Encephalocele Development

Page 34: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Nasal Masses

Evaluation

Most often infants and children

Dermoids-fistula tract, hair, pus or sebum, midline

Gliomas-firm, noncompressible, does not

transilluminate, telangiectasias

Encephaloceles-soft, compressible, bluish or red,

enlarge with crying, positive Furstenburg test

Do not biopsy extra or intranasal mass in a child before

imaging (Risk of meningitis or CSF leak if there is an

intracranial connection)

Page 35: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Imaging

• CT and MRI most used

CT findings include: fluid filled cyst, soft tissue mass, intracranial mass, enlargement of foramen cecum, distortion of crista galli

CT findings suggestive of intracranial extension are enlarged foramen cecum and bifidity of crista galli

Findings valuable if absent, (when present may be false positive)

Page 36: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

CT Imaging

Nasal Dermoid axial ct with dermoid

anterior to nasal and maxillary bones,

no bony dehiscence or abnormalities

noted

Page 37: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Nasal Dermoid with

Intracranial Extension

Page 38: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

CT Imaging

Encephalocele with defect noted in cribiform

plate and herniation of brain tissue

Page 39: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

MRI

Better delineates soft tissue

Ability to visualize in the sagittal plane

Denoyelle 36 children with dermoids, 2 patients

had CT suggestive of intracranial involvement

not found at surgery.

Recommended CT followed by MRI to confirm

intracranial connection

Page 41: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

MRI-Glioma

Saggital T1

Page 42: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

MRI-Glioma

Sagittal T2

Page 43: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

MRI-Glioma

Coronal T2

Page 45: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Workup

History/Physical Examination

Nasal obstruction, polypoid intranasal mass, CSF

leak, presence of hair or fistulous tract, compressible

or firm, presence of pulsations, enlargement with

crying or internal jugular compression

Radiologic Evaluation (CT and/or MRI)

No Intracranial Extension (Dermoid/Glioma)

Intracranial Extension

Page 46: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Treatment

Surgical Treatment

Complete excision (open-transcranial vs extracranial,

vs endoscopic approaches described)

Perform early to avoid nasal distortion, bony

atrophy, osteomyelitis, meningitis

dermoids-must excise entire tract to prevent

recurrence

Page 47: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Dermoid

Can be removed endoscopically or via open

approach

Transverse rhinotomy has been described

•Small to moderately sized lesions

•Avoids vertical scar and splaying

Page 48: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Nasal Dermoid with intracranial extension.

Meher R, Singh I, et al. J Postgrad Med 2005;51:39-40.

Dermoid cyst with intracranial extension without

craniotomy

Nasal bones removed along with anterior part of the frontal

bone

Followed sac through cribiform plate, incised wall of sac and

evacuated contents, and removed all except for its base where

it was attached to dura

Destroyed secretory epithelial surface of remnant of sac with

bipolar, replaced bone and closed wound in layers

Pt did well postoperative and no recurrence noted during 2

year follow up.

Page 49: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Glioma

Can be removed via open or endoscopic

approach

Lateral rhinotomy or alar incisions may be used for

intranasal gliomas or combined intra-extranasal gliomas

Several authors have reported isolated cases of

endoscopic excision of small gliomas with and without

evidence of intracranial extension.

Page 50: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Encephaloceles

In the past required combined approach with

neurosurgery

Frontal craniotomy is performed, intracranial

mass excised, bone-dura defect is repaired

Extracranial mass is then removed

More reports describing endoscopic removal

Page 51: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Conclusion

Midline nasal masses are rare but must be

remembered in the differential

Furstenberg’s test

Don’t biopsy without imaging

Surgical intervention necessity

Page 52: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Bibliography

Agirdir B, Derin A, Ozbilim G, et al. Endoscopic management of intranasal glioma. J pediatric Surg 2004;39:1571-3.

Bilkay U, Gundogan H, Ozek C, Tokat C, Gurler T, Songur E, et al. Nasal dermoid sinus cysts and the role of open rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 2001;47:8-14

Bloom DC, Carvalho DS, Dory C, Brewster DF, Wickersham JK, Kearns DB. Imaging and surgical approach of nasal dermoids. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002;62:111-22

Brown K, Brown OE. Congenital Malformations of the nose. In: Cummings CW, ed. Pediatric Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery 3rd edition, St. Louis, Mosby; 1998:92-98

Burckhardt W, Tobon D. Endoscopic approach to nasal glioma. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 1999;120:747-748.

Clark WD, Bailey BJ, Stiernberg CM. Nasal dermoid with intracranial involvement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;93:102-4

Denoyelle F, Ducroz V, Roger G, Garabedian EN. Nasal dermoid sinus cysts in children. The Laryngoscope 1997;107:795-800.

Dimov P, Rouev P, Tenev K, Krosneva R, Valkanov P. Endoscopic surgery for removal of a nasal glioma: case report. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;124:690.

Edward J. Wladis, MD · Rudolph S. Wagner, MD. Dermoid cysts in children. Pediatric Ophthamology. Tutorial. www.ophthalmic.hyperguides.com

Haafiz AB, Sharma R, Faillace WJ. Congenital Midline Nasofrontal Mass. Clinical Pediatrics September 1995:482-486

Hayashi T, Utsanomiya H, Hashimoto T. Transethmoidal encephalocele. Surg Neurol 1985; 24: 651-655

Huisman TA, Schneider JF, Kellenberger CJ et al. developmental nasal midline masses in children:neuroradiological evaluation. Eur Radiol 2004; 14(2):243-49.

Page 53: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Bibliography Ingraham FD, Matson DD. An unusual nasopharyngeal encephalocele. New Eng J Med 1943;228:815-820

Mahapatra AK, Tandon PN, Dhawan IK, Khazanchi RK. Anterior encephaloceles. A report of 30 cases. Childs

Nervs Syst 1994; 10: 501-504

Mahapatra AK. Anterior encephaloceles. Indian J Pediatr 1997; 64: 699-704.

Marxhall AH, Jones NS, Robertson, IJ. Endoscopic repair of basal encephaloceles. J Laryngol Otol

2001;115:545-47.

Meher R, Singh I, Aggarwal S. Nasal dermoid with intracranial extension. J Postgrad Med 2005;51:39-40.

Pensler J, Bauer B, Naidich T. Craniofacial dermoids. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;82:953-958.

Pollock RA. Surgical approaches to the nasal dermoid cyst. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 1983;10:498-501.

Rahbar R, Shah P, Mulliken JB, Robson CD, Perez-Atayde AR, Proctor MR, et al. The presentation and

management of nasal dermoid: A 30-year experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:464-71

Schlosser RJ, Faust RA, Phillips CD, Gross CW. Three-dimensional computed tomography of congenital nasal

anomalies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002;65:125-31.

Sessions RB, Picken C. Congenital Anomalies of the nose. In: Bailey BJ, ed., Head & Neck Surgery-

Otolaryngology, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001:941-948.

Swift AC, Singh SD. The presentation and management of the nasal glioma. International J. Pediatric

Otorhinolaryngology 1985;10:253-261

Turgut M, Ozcan OE, Benli K, Ozgen T, Gurcay O, Saglam S, Bertan V, Erbengi A. Congenital nasal

encephalocele: a review of 35 cases. Journal of Cranio Maxillo-Facial Surgery 1995;23:1-5

Wardinsky TD, Pagon RA, Kropp RJ, Hayden PW, Clarren SK. Nasal dermoid sinus cysts: Association with

intracranial extension and multiple malformations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:87-95

Page 54: Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Midline Nasal Masses

Bibliography

Weiss DD, Robson CD, Mulliken JB. Transnasal endoscopic excision of midline nasal dermoid from the anterior cranial base. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1998;101(6):2119-2123.

Woodsworth BA, Schlosser RJ, Faust RA, et al. Evolutions in the management of congenital intranasal skull base defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:1283-88.

Yokoyama M, Inouye N, Mizuno F. Endoscopic management of nasal glioma in infancy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999;51:51-54.

Zerris VA, Annino D, Heilman CB. Nasofrontal dermoid sinus cyst: Report of two cases. Neurosurgery 2002;51:811-4