DICION PAPER ERIEftp.iza.org/dp11915.pdf · 2018. 11. 15. · ATACT ZA DP o. 11915 CTBE 2018 Household Collective Models: Three Decades of Theoretical Contributions and Empirical

DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES

IZA DP No. 11915

Olivier DonniJosé Alberto Molina

Household Collective Models: Three Decades of Theoretical Contributions and Empirical Evidence

OCTOBER 2018

Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity.The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society.IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.

Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–953113 Bonn, Germany

Phone: +49-228-3894-0Email: [email protected] www.iza.org

IZA – Institute of Labor Economics

DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES

IZA DP No. 11915

Household Collective Models: Three Decades of Theoretical Contributions and Empirical Evidence

OCTOBER 2018

Olivier DonniTHEMA and Université de Cergy-Pontoise

José Alberto MolinaUniversity of Zaragoza and IZA

ABSTRACT

IZA DP No. 11915 OCTOBER 2018

Household Collective Models: Three Decades of Theoretical Contributions and Empirical Evidence*

Household collective models celebrate their thirtieth birthday. The collective approach

constitutes, perhaps, the microeconomics topic that has produced the largest number

of papers (both published and in working paper/mimeo formats) during the last three

decades, beginning with the seminal paper published by P.A. Chiappori in Econometrica

(Chiappori, 1988). To add to some excellent surveys of household collective models (Strauss

et al., 2000; Vermeulen, 2002; Donni and Chiappori, 2011; Chiappori and Mazzocco,

2017), we here perform a bibliographic review of the literature, which includes theoretical

contributions, as well as the international empirical evidence related to the collective

approach. With respect to the theoretical papers, the collective framework has been used

to provide theoretical results for a number of household issues; for example, labour supply,

consumption and savings, household production, and intra-household allocation. As for

the empirical papers, the international evidence covers the majority of developed and

developing countries from all continents.

JEL Classification: D10, J22, Y10

Keywords: household, collective models, Pareto efficiency, sharing rule, labor supply, consumption

Corresponding author:José Alberto MolinaDepartment of Economics AnalysisFaculty of EconomicsGran Via 25005 ZaragozaSpain

E-mail: [email protected]

* This document was mainly written while Jose Alberto Molina was Visiting Professor at the Department of

Economics of Boston College (US), to which he would like to express his thanks for the hospitality and facilities

provided. We are very grateful to Pierre-André Chiappori for helpful suggestions. Comments are welcome.

2

The collective approach celebrates its thirtieth birthday. On this occasion, we present a bibliography that includes all the papers (or at least most of them) inspired by the seminal paper of Pierre-André Chiappori, the founder of the collective approach, “Rational Household Labor Supply”, published in 1988. The collective approach to household behavior arose from the hypothesis that (i) each individual in the household has specific preferences and (ii) the outcome of the decision process is Pareto efficient. In spite of important earlier contributions that already used Pareto efficiency as the basis of household behavior models (and which we have not included), the aforementioned paper and its sequel, “Collective Labor Supply and Welfare”, published in 1992, introduced original ideas that have opened up new areas of research. We can point out at least three important and original contributions of these two papers:

1. The Pareto efficiency hypothesis is theoretically justified. Efficiency is seen as a fundamental axiom, comparable to the classical axioms of consumer theory. It can be challenged, but it remains the benchmark hypothesis. It also replaces the axioms of the Nash solution used in prior models of household behavior. Consequently, the collective model can be seen as the “true” neoclassical model of household behavior, while the unitary model remains a holistic deviation.

2. Pareto efficiency has two important consequences: a. Testability: Like any other model of household behavior that is susceptible to challenge, the

unitary model must be testable from survey data (in Popper’s sense). The collective model actually generates restrictions on household behavior that are not satisfied by any other model. These restrictions are comparable to the Slutsky conditions in the unitary case.

b. Identifiability: In analogy with the unitary model, for which utility functions can be recovered up to a monotonic transformation, the structural components of the model must be recoverable from observable behavior (e.g., demand equations that are estimated from the usual data). Using the efficiency hypothesis, together with auxiliary hypotheses, it can be shown that individual utility functions and the sharing of resources can be recovered from observed behavior. Consequently, the intra-household distribution of resources can be studied by econometricians.

3. A new technique of proof is proposed. Identifiability and testability is proven, according to a new technique that will be applied in many other papers.

This bibliography also includes papers that are not directly inspired by the two aforementioned papers, but have benefitted from the new interest by the profession in intra-household bargaining, with these including tests of the multi-person income-pooling hypothesis and multi-utility models of household behavior that include equivalence-scale models. We have included not only published papers, but also a number of books, chapters of books, and a number of unpublished papers that are included in reputable working paper collections. We also restrict the bibliography to “neo-classical” economic literature, even if the idea behind collective models may have been burgeoning outside this limited domain of research. Finally, one of our objectives is also to point out original papers that have been overlooked by the profession.

Despite that we have attempted to be complete and exhaustive, we are conscious that this bibliography does not do justice to some important papers (e.g., on risk sharing, or marriage) that, although they focus on the multiplicity of individuals in the household, are far from the collective approach.

3

TABLE OF CONTRIBUTIONS RELATE TO COLLECTIVE MODELS (1988- OCTOBER 2018)

Year Authors Journal Theoretical/

Survey/Empirical Country Data/Years Keywords JEL Codes

1988 Chiappori Econome-

trica Theoretical NA NA

Labor Supply Intra-Household Nonparametric

NA

1989 Deaton Book NA NA NA Household

Surveys Microeconometric

NA

1989 Lommerud JOLE Theoretical NA NA Marital Contracts

Divorce Allocation of Time

NA

1990 Chiappori AES Theoretical NA NA Demand

Collective Good Pareto Efficiency

NA

1990 Haddad & Kanbur EJ Empirical Philippines 1984-5 Intra-Household

Inequality NA

1990 Kooreman & Kapteyn JHR Empirical Netherlands DLMS/1982 Two-Person

Games Labor Supply

NA

1990 McElroy JHR Theoretical NA NA Nash-Bargained

Household Decisions

NA

1990 Schultz JHR Empirical Thailand Socioeconomic

Survey/1981 Labor Supply

Fertility NA

1990 Thomas JHR Empirical Brazil Survey/1974-75 Intra-Household

Resource Allocation

NA

1990 Woolley PhD

Thesis NA NA NA

Family Decisions Non-Cooperation Intergenerational

NA

1992 Bourguignon & Chiappori

EER Survey NA NA Collective Models

Household Behavior

NA

4

1992 Chiappori JPE Theoretical NA NA Labor Supply

Altruism Welfare

NA

1992 Haddad & Kanbur EER Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household

Inequality NA

1992 Lloyd AEP Theoretical NA NA Rationality

Intra-Household NA

1992 Ott Book NA NA NA Intra-Household

Bargaining NA

1993 Haddad & Kanbur AES Empirical Philippines Household Survey Intra-Household

Nutritional Program

NA

1993 Bourguignon et al. AES Empirical France INSEE/1984-85 Intra-Household

Consumption Income Pooling

NA

1993 Lundberg & Pollak JPE Theoretical NA NA Separate Spheres Bargaining Model

Intra-Marriage NA

1993 Thomas AES Empirical Brazil ENDEF/1974-75 Intra-Household

Income Expenditures

NA

1994 Browning et al. JPE Empirical Canada FAMEX/

1978, 82,84, 1986

Intra-Household Income Outcomes

Efficiency NA

1994 Chiappori Chapter

Book Theoretical NA NA

Collective Household

NA

1994 Haddad & Hoddinot WD Empirical Côte d’Ivore CILSS/1986-87 Intra-Household

Child Status Anthropometrics

NA

1994 Jerison RES Theoretical NA NA Optimality

Income Distribution

NA

1994 Kanbur & Haddad OEP Theoretical NA NA Cooperation Household Production

NA

1994 Kawaguchi AE Empirical Australia AIDS/1986 Household Labor

Supply NA

1994 Kooreman JAEcon Empirical Denmark NA Simultaneously

Non-Cooperation Labor Supply

NA

5

1994 Lundberg & Pollak AERP&P Theoretical NA NA Non-Cooperation

Bargaining Marriage

NA

1994 Thomas JHR Empirical US Brazil Ghana

NLS/1986 GLSS/1987-88

ENDEF/1974-75 1986

Intra-Househod Parental

Education Child Height

NA

1994 Thomas & Chen Working

Paper Empirical Taiwan PSID/1980

Intra-Household Income

Demand NA

1995 Alderman et al. WBRO Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household

Preferences Policy Analysis

NA

1995 Browning RiE Empirical Canada FES/

1982-84-86-90-92

Intra-Household Savings

Retirement D13, D91

1995 Haddad et al. OBES Empirical Philippines 455 households Intra-Household

Inequality Welfare

NA

1995 Hoddinott & Haddad OBES Empirical Côte d’Ivoire Survey Female Income

Household Expenditures

NA

1995 Konrad & Lommerud SJE Theoretical NA NA Non-Cooperation Time Allocation

Public Good NA

1995 Phipps & Burton CJE Empirical Canada FES/1982, 1986,

1992

Poverty Intra-Household

Financial Resources

NA

1995 Phipps & Burton FE Empirical Seven countries LIS Intra-Household

Labor Supply Gender Power

NA

1995 Strauss & Thomas Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Human Resources Empirical Decisions

NA

1996 Apps & Rees JPubE Empirical Australia IDS/1985-86

Labor Supply Household

Production Intra-family Inequality

D11, D12, D13, J22

6

1996 Bradbury Working

Paper Empirical Australia HES/1988-89

Household Income Consumption

NA

1996 Doss WD Survey NA NA Intra-Household

Resource Allocation

NA

1996 Lundberg & Pollak JEP Survey NA NA Bargaining

Intra-Household Marriage

NA

1996 Phipps & Burton CPP Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household

Policy Makers Transfers Taxation

NA

1996 Udry JPE Empirical Burkina Faso ICRISAT/ 1981-1985

Gender Agricultural

Pareto Efficiency NA

1996 Wells & Maher Working

Paper Theoretical NA NA

Time Surplus Allocation

Intra-Marriage NA

1997 Apps & Rees JPE Theoretical NA NA Household Production

Labor Supply NA

1997 Agarwal FE Survey NA NA Bargaining Models

Gender Social Norms

NA

1997 Behrman Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Intra-Household Consensus Models

Non-Consensus NA

1997 Bruce & Lloyd Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Female-Headed Household Developing Countries

NA

1997 Carter & Katz Chapter


Separate Spheres Gender

NA

1997 Chiappori JPE Theoretical NA NA

Household Production

Labor Supply Intra-Household

NA

1997 Chiuri & Simmons EJ Theoretical NA NA Decentralization Demand System

Public Goods NA

1997 Deaton Book NA NA NA Household Survey Microeconometric

Policy NA

7

1997 Dey Abbas Chapter

Book Empirical

Sub-Saharian Africa

NA Gender

Intra-Household Policy

NA

1997 Folbre Chapter


Gender Coalitions Inequality

NA

1997 Fortin & Lacroix EJ Empirical Canada CCPH/1986

Labor Supply Income Pooling

Slutsky Restrictions

NA

1997 Gittelsohn & Mookherji Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Anthropological Methods

Intra-Household NA

1997 Guyer Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Endowments Anthropology

Whealth NA

1997 Harris-White Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Gender Nutrition

Intra-Household NA

1997 Hoddinott et al. Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Testing Models Intra-Household

NA

1997 Katz FE Survey NA NA

Gender Bargaining Theory


NA

1997 Lundberg et al. JHR Empirical UK FES/1973-1990 Income-pooling Intra-Household

Experiment NA

1997 McElroy Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Policy Family Bargaining

Marriage NA

1997 Seaton AEL Empirical UK FES/1984 Labor Supply

Revealed Preference

NA

1998 Behrman & Rosenzweig Working

Paper Empirical US MTR/1994

In-Law Resources Transfers Bequests

NA

1998 Brett JPubE Theoretical NA NA Optimal Taxation

Tax Reform D10, D61, H21, H31

1998 Browning & Chiappori Econome-

trica Empirical Canada

FAMEX/1974, 1978, 1982, 1984, 1986, 1990, 1992

Efficiency Bargaining

Slutsky Matrix NA

8

1998 Fafchamps Working


Efficiency Rural Households

NA

1998 Gray AER Empirical UA Census/1960-70-80

CPS/1968-79 PSID/1970-1980

Divorce-Laws Bargaining

Labor Supply NA

1998 Klassen JEH Survey NA NA Sex-Mortality Gender-Bias

Intra-Household NA

1998 Phipps & Burton Economica Empirical Canada FES/1992 Income Pooling Consumption Gender Power

NA

1999 Apps & Rees JPubE Theoretical NA NA Tax Reform

Domestic Production

NA

1999 Biswal CPP Empirical Canada FES/1986-92 Income-Pooling

Immigrants Married-Women

NA

1999 Bourguignon JOPE Theoretical NA NA Consumption

Intra-Household Cost of Children

D10, J13, J15

1999 Chiappori Mimeo Theoretical NA NA Labor Supply Risk Sharing

NA

1999 Chiappori & Ekeland Econome-


Aggregation Consumer Theory Market Demand

NA

1999 Gersbach & Haller Chapter


Multi-Members Consumption

Equilibria NA

1999 Lundberg Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Retirement Bargaining Models

NA

1999 Lundberg & Rose Mimeo Theoretical NA NA Specialization

Marriage NA

1999 Snyder JPubE Theoretical NA NA

Pareto Optimality Public Goods

Revealed Preference

NA

1999 Tiefenthaler JOPE Empirical Brazil NSS/1989 Labor Supply

Intra-Household Income pooling

D1, J2

9

2000 Blundell & Robin Econome-


Consumer Separability

Price Aggreation NA

2000 Browning SJE Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household

Saving Consumption

D1, D7

2000 Chiuri Labour Empirical Italy SHIW/1993 Child Care

Female Labor Supply

D1, J2

2000 Chiuri RE Survey NA NA Consumption Labor Supply

Intra-Household D1, D7

2000 Dercon JPE Empirical Ethiopia NA Nutrition

Consumption Intra-Household

NA

2000 Donni PhD

Thesis NA NA NA

Collective Models Consumption

NA

2000 Hallberg Working

Paper Empirical Sweden STUS/ 1984-93

Time Use Unitary Model

NA

2000 Konrad & Lommerud CJE Theoretical NA NA Bargaining

Human Capital Non-Cooperation

D13, J24

2000 Maitra & Ray Mimeo Empirical South Africa

Pakistan NA

Intra-Household Labor

Income I32, I38, D12,C32

2000 Moreau EP Empirical France INSEE/1994-96 Labor Supply

Divorce Threat NA

2000 Pavoni Working


Dynamic Decisions

Labor Supply NA

2000 Rubalcava & Thomas Working

Paper Empirical US PSID/1968-92

Aid to Families Dependent Children

NA

2000 Snyder SEJ Empirical US NLS/1969-1971

Bargaining Revealed

Preference Pareto Efficiency

D11, D12

2000 Sprumont JET Theoretical NA NA Collective Choices

Revealed Preference

C72, C92

2000 Strauss et al. JAE Survey NA NA Intra-Household

Theories Empirical

NA

10

2001 Aronsson et al JOPE Empirical Sweden HUS/1984-1993 Time Use

Home Production Intra-Household

D13, J22

2001 Barmby & Smith AE Empirical Denmark/UK DLS/1986 FES/1984

Labor Supply Pareto Behavior Intra-Household

NA

2001 Beblo Book NA NA NA Bargaining

Time Allocation NA

2001 Beegle et al. SFP Empirical Indonesia ILFS/1997-98 Women’s Power

Reproductive Decisions

NA

2001 Browning & Lechene Working

Paper Empirical Canada FAMEX/1969-92

Caring Income Pooling Intra-Household

NA

2001 Bustreel RevE Theoretical NA NA Non-Cooperation Time Allocation

D1, J22

2001 Chen & Woolley EJ Theoretical NA NA Two-Person Family

Bargaining Cournot-Nash

NA

2001 Dauphin & Fortin EL Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household

Polygamy Pareto Optimality

D11, D70

2001 Fong & Zhang JPE Theoretical NA NA Identification

Marriage Spousal Leisure

NA

2001 Gersbach & Haller RES Theoretical NA NA

General Equilibrium Intra-

Household Efficiency

NA

2001 Seaton AEL Empirical UK FES/1984

Labor Supply Bargaining Revealed

Preference

NA

2002 Angrist QJE Empirical US Census

IPMUS/1910-20-40

Sex Ratios Immigrants Experiment

NA

2002 Apps & Rees LE Empirical Australia AustraliaTUS/1992 Child Costs

Time Allocation Home Production

J13, J22, D13

11

2002 Attanasio & Lechene RED Empirical Mexico PROGRESA/

1998-2000

Income-pooling Intra-Household Gender Power

J12, D13, H31

2002 Chiappori et al. JPE Empirical US PSID/1989 Labor Supply

Marriage Divorce Children

NA

2002 Hallberg Ph.D. Thesis

NA NA NA Household Behavior Time Use

NA

2002 Koolwal & Ray Working

Paper Empirical Nepal NLSS

Female’s Share Wage Earnings

Welfare NA

2002 Ligon Working

Paper Empirical Bangladesh NA

Dynamic Pareto Efficiency Intra-Household

NA

2002 Lundberg Mimeo Theoretical NA NA Specialization

Policy NA

2002 Luo JBES Empirical Canada SFE/

1978, 1982, 84, 86

Preferences Heterogeneity

Quadratic PIGLOG

NA

2002 Moreau & Donni AES Empirical France ECHP/1994 Labor Supply

Taxation Divorce

NA

2002 Ray & Basu Working

Paper Empirical Nepal NLSS/1995

Balance of Power Child Labor

Woman’s Power NA

2002 Rubalcava et al. Working

Paper Empirical Mexico PROGRESA

Woman’s Power Consumption Time

Welfare NA

2002 Thomas et al. Mimeo Empirical Indonesia IFLS/1993-97 Relative Power

Intra-Household Child Health

NA

2002 Vermeulen JES Survey NA NA Collective Models Principles Results

NA

2002 Wirl & Feichtinger Economica Theoretical NA NA Non-Cooperation

Dynamic Intra-Household

NA

2003 Andreoni et al. JHR Empirical US Gallup

Organization/ 1992-94

Charitable Giving Bargaining

Relative Power NA

12

2003 Arias et al. Working

Paper Empirical Italy IHBS/1999

Sharing Rule Clothing

Equivalence Scales NA

2003 Blacklow & Ray ER Empirical Australia AHS/1975-1999 Sharing Rule

Intra-Household Demand System

NA

2003 Donni JPubE Theoretical NA NA Labor Supply Income Tax

Corner Solutions H31, J22

2003 Duflo WBER Empirical South Africa SALDRU/1993 Grandparents Age Pension

Intra-Household H55, O15, I12, D13

2003 Fernandez-Val IE Empirical Spain ECHP/1994-97 Labor Suppy

Intra-Household Unitary/Collective

J22, D1

2003 Lakshmanasamy JSED Empirical India NA Unitary/Collective

Income Pooling Female’s Power

NA

2003 Lewbel JEcon Empirical US Consumer

Expenditure Survey

Equivalence Scales Consumer Demand

Bargaining K1, D1, J17, C30, I31

2003 Lich-Tyler Mimeo Empirical US PSID/1976-86 Intertemporal

Bargaining Euler Equations

D91, D19, J12

2003 Lundberg & Pollak REHO Theoretical NA NA Marriage Efficiency Bargaining

D10, J12, J61

2003 Lundberg et al. JPubE Empirical US PSID/1979-86,

1989-92

Consumption Married Couples

Retirement D1, D91, E21

2003 Maitra & Ray Mimeo Empirical Australia AHES/1998-99 Spousal Power

Expenditure Intra-Household

D13, C31

2003 Quisumbing & Maluccio OBES Empirical Bangladesh, SA

Ethiopia, Indonesia,

Various/1996-1998 Marriage

Intra-Household Bargaining Power

NA

2004 Adam et al. Chapter

Book Empirical Canada

Time Series/ 1960-96

Intra-Household Bargaining

Divorce D10, J12

2004 Beblo et al. AEQ Empirical Germany GSOEP/1998 Labor Supply

Intra-Household Tax Reform

D11, D12, D13, D31, J12, J22

13

2004 Borelli & Perali Working

Paper Empirical Djibouti

African Society/ 1996

Intra-Household Sharing Rule Drug

Consumption NA

2004 Bradbury CESifo Empirical UK HES/1988-89, 93-94, 98-99

Intra-Household Consumption Experiment

J10, J12, I38

2004 Carvajal & Gonzalez JME Theoretical NA NA Nash Bargaining

Revealed Preferences

NA

2004 Clark et al. RevE Empirical UK BHPS/1997 Labor Supply Sharing Rule

Marriage Market C31, C71, D10, J22

2004 Lewel Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Equivalence Scales Household

Demand K1, D1, J17, C30, I31

2004 Lundberg & Ward-Batts Working

Paper Empirical US HRS/1992

Bargaining Spouses’ Control

Net Worth NA

2004 Maitra & Ray Chapter

Book Empirical South Africa NA

Household Composition Budget Share

NA

2004 Mazzocco AER Empirical US HRS/1992 Intertemporal Risk Sharing

HARA Preferences NA

2004 Michaud & Vermeulen LE Empirical US HRS/1992-2008 Intra-Household

Labor Supply Retirement

D13, H310, J22, J26

2004 Moehling JEH Empirical US BLSCLS/1917-19 Working Children

Clothing Expenditures

NA

2004 Peluso & Trannoy Chapter


Lorenz Dominance Intra-Household

Inequality D10, D63, D31, D81

2004 Rapallini RPE Empirical Italy ICS/1999 Bargaining Power

Sharing Rule Consumption

D13, H31

2005 Aura JPubE Empirical US CPS1989 HRS

AHEAD

Nash-Bargaining Marriage Annuities

D1, J1

2005 Blundell et al. JPE Theoretical NA NA Public

Consumption Welfare

NA

14

2005 Bourguignon & Chiuri Working

Paper Empirical France

FranceTUS/ 1998-199

Women Home Production

Time Use D13, J22

2005 Chiappori AERAE

2005 Hourriez Mimeo Empirical France ECHP/1994-2001 Labor Supply

Non-Participation Intra-Household

D13, J22

2005 Iyigun Working


Marriage Matching

Labor Supply C78, D61, D70

2005 Jia REHO Empirical Norway Statistics Norway/

1994-96

Labor Supply Retirement Bargaining

D10, J26

2005 Lundberg Working

Paper Empirical US NLSY79

Child Gender Labor Supply

Time Allocation J22, J12, J13, J16

2005 Maitra & Ray AEP Empirical Australia AHES1998-99 Simultaneous Expenditure

Bargaining Power NA

2005 Maitra & Ray Working

Paper Empirical Pakistan PIHS/1991

Expenditures Resource Pooling Intra-Household

I32, I38, D12, D32

2005 Strand JRU Theoretical NA NA Bargaining

Intertemporal Optimal Life

I12, G22, J17

2005 Vermeulen EmpE Empirical Netherlands DNBHS/1995-2003 Intra-Household

Bargaining Labor Suppy

D12, J22

2006 Alessie et al. Working

Paper Empirical

Ten European Countries

ECHP/2001 Consumption

Financial Satisfaction

D12, D13,I31

2006 Bargain et al. REHO Survey NA NA Labor Supply


D11, D12, J22

2006 Bargain & Moreau AERAE Empirical France NA Labor Supply Tax Reform Simulations

NA

2006 Basu EJ Theoretical NA NA

Gender Balance of Power

Household Equilibrium

NA

15

2006 Bayudan AE Empirical Phillipines CLHNS/1984-1999 Wive’s Time Allocation

Intra-Household NA

2006 Beninger et al. REHO Empirical Germany GSOEP/1998 Labor Supply


D11, D12, J22

2006 Beninger &Laisney CESR Empirical France NA Labor Supply

Policy Simulations

NA

2006 Browning et al. REHO Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household

Distribution Factors

D13

2006 Chiappori & Donni AERAE Survey NA NA Non-Unitary Cooperative

Non-Cooperative NA

2006 Chiappori & Ekeland JET Theoretical NA NA Demand Theory

Aggregation Group Behavior

D11, D13, C65

2006 Choo & Siow JPE Empirical US Census/

1971-72, 81-82

Marriage Market Non-Parametric

Matching NA

2006 Dauphin et al. AERAE Empirical UK FES/1982-93 Consumption

Testing Collective Model

NA

2006 Donni CJE Theoretical NA NA Demand Theory

Slutsky Symmetry Welfare

NA

2006 Donni AERAE Empirical US PSID/1990 Non-Cooperation

Labor Supply Nash

J22, D13, C79

2006 Fuwa et al. DE Empirical India NA

Child Labor Intra-Household

NGO Interventions

C81, D13, I21, I31, J16, J22, J24, O15

2006 Lancaster et al. Economica Empirical India NSS/1993-94 Endogeneity

Bargaining Power Expenditure

NA

2006 Mazzocco Working


Public Consumption

Children D10, D91, H41

2006 McPeak & Doss AJAE Empirical Kenya Survey/1993-97 Household Production

Non-Cooperation NA

16

2006 Myck et al. REHO Empirical UK FRS/1998-99 Fiscal Reforms Labor Supply

Intra-Household D11, D12

2006 Rapoport et al. AERAE Empirical France EET-INSEE/

1998-99


Sharing Rule NA

2006 Vermeulen JOPE Empirical Belgique SEP/1992-1997 Female

Labor Supply Tax Reform

D11, D12, J22

2006 Vermeulen et al. REHO Theoretical NA NA Labor Supply Tax Reform

Non-Participation D11, D12, J22

2006 Vermeulen et al. AERAE Empirical Belgium EB-INS/

1996-97, 1997-98, 2000

Public Consumption

Intra-Household NA

2007 Apps & Rees Working


Cooperation Welfare Function

Bargaining D10

2007 Aura Mimeo Theoretical NA NA Dynamic

Commitment Consumption

D1, D91, J12

2007 Bargain & Moreau Chapter


Taxation Intra-Household

Simulations NA

2007 Beninger et al. JOPE Empirical Germany GSOEP/1998 Labor Supply


D11, D12, J22

2007 Blundell et al. RES Empirical UK FES/1978-2001 Labor Suppy

Heterogeneity Non-participation

NA

2007 Chau et al. ChER Empirical China USU-SSB/2002

Labor Supply Developing

country Patriarchalism

D13, J22, O12

2007 Cherchye et al. Econome-


Intra-Household Revealed

Preferences Nonparametric

NA

2007 Couprie EJ Empirical UK BHPS/1992-2000 Leisure Demand

Time Use Welfare

NA

17

2007 Daunfeldt & Hellstrom Labor Empirical Sweden HUS/1984-93 Time Allocation


C24, D13, J22

2007 Donni EJ Empirical France INSEE/1984-85 Female


NA

2007 Donni & Moreau JHR Empirical France INSEE/1999-2000 Labor supply Conditional

demand NA

2007 Iyigun & Walsh JDE Theoretical NA NA Gender Power Labor Supply

Bargaining J13, O11, O33, O40

2007 Iyigun & Walsh RES Theoretical NA NA

Marriage Market Spousal Powers

Assortative Matching

NA

2007 Lee EDCC Empirical South Korea KHPS/1993-98 Consumption

Spouses Power Dynamic

NA

2007 Lundberg & Pollak JEP Survey NA NA Family Economics American Families

NA

2007 Mazzocco RESt Empirical US CEX/1984-1995 Commitment Intertemporal

Intra-Household NA

2007 Rainer EER Theoretical NA NA Asset Division

Divorce Marital Contract

J12, K11, D78

2007 Trannoy & Peluso JET Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household

Inequality Sharing Rule

D13, D63, D31

2007 Xu Mimeo Survey NA NA Intra-Household

Bargaining Dynamics

NA

2008 Cherchye et al. JEcon Empirical Russia RMLS/1994-2003 Revealed

Preferences Programming

D11, D12, D14

2008 Cherchye & Vermeulen RESt Empirical Netherlands DNBHS/1995-2005 Labor Supply


C13, D12, J22

2008 Chiappori & Oreffice JPE Theoretical NA NA Birth Control

Intra-Household Female Power

NA

18

2008 Dietrich AFE Empirical China CHNS/1991-93 Consumption

Demand System Bargaining

NA

2008 Donni JPubE Theoretical NA NA Labor supply Public goods

NA

2008 Donni Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Collective Models Household

NA

2008 Ermisch & Pronzato EJ Empirical UK BHPS/1991-2005 Intra-Household

Father’s Child Payments

NA

2008 Fafchamps Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Intra-Household Welfare

NA

2008 Kalugina et al. EP

2008 Lewbel & Penkakur JEcon Empirical Canada CFES/1990-92 Consumption

Demand System Bargaining

D12, D11, C30, C31, J12

2008 Mazzocco Mimeo Empirical US CEX/1982-95 Consumption Intertemporal Commitment

NA

2008 Mazzocco Mimeo Empirical US CEX/1982-98 Consumption Intertemporal Identification

NA

2008 Rasul JDE Empirical Malaysia MFLS/

1976-77, 1988-89

Fertility Bargaining

Commitment J12, J13, O12

2008 Silvennoinen Ph.D. Thesis

NA NA NA Intra-Household Time Allocation

NA

2008 Siow CJE Empirical China NA Marriage Matching

Labor Supply NA

2008 Van Klaveren et al REHO Empirical UK BHPS/2003 Labor Supply

Intra-Household Time Allocation

D12, D13, J22

2008 Ward-Batts JHR Empirical UK FES/1973-1983

(excluding 1977-79)

Income Pooling Intra-Household

Expenditure shares

NA

2008 Yoshida & Kim AE Empirical Japan 1996-97-98 Consumption Health Risk Income Risk

NA

19

2009 Allgood JPubET Theoretical NA NA Tax Policy Household Production

NA

2009 Ashraf AER Empirical Philippines Authors’data/

2004

Experiments Information

Communication D13, D14, J12, J16, O15

2009 Bobonis JPE Empirical Mexico PROGRESA Intra-Household

Female Consumption

NA

2009 Bonke &Browning FS Empirical Denmark DHES/1999-2005 Intra-Household

Expenditure D13, C81, C42

2009 Bonke & Browning REHO Empirical Denmark ECHP/1994 Relative Income

Well-being Intra-Household

D13, D60, D63, I31

2009 Bonke & Browing EJ Empirical Denmark DHES/1999-2005 Expenditure

Children NA

2009 Bourguignon et al. RES Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household

Efficiency Identification

NA

2009 Cherchye et al. Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Revealed Preference Demand

NA

2009 Cherchye et al. JPE Empirical Russia RMLS Revealed

Preference Intra-Household

2009 Chiappori & Ekeland Econome-


Non-parametric Identification Labor Supply

NA

2009 Crespo IE Empirical Spain ECHP/1994-1999 Labor Supply

Intra-Household Unitary/Collective

J22, D13

2009 Deb JET Theoretical NA NA

Externalities Revealed

Preference Consumption

C14, C72, D11, D59

2009 Donni RESt Empirical US CES/1980-2003 Public Goods Conditional

Demands NA

2009 Kalugina et al. RIW Empirical Russia RMLS/1994-1998 Inequality

Identification Sharing Rule

NA

2009 Kalugina et al. REHO Empirical Russia RMLS/1994-2003 Intra-Household

Inequality D13, I31, C3, P36

20

2009 Kato & Matsumoto TRB Empirical Japan Time Surveys/2003 Intra-Household Children Gender

Spouses Job NA

2009 Lundberg et al. REHO Empirical US NLSY79 Children Parents

Investments NA

2009 Sahn & Younger HE Empirical Seven countries LSMS BMI

Intra-Household NA

2009 Seitz JLE Empirical US NLSY79/1979-1994 Racial Differences

Marriage Dynamic

NA

2009 Trannoy & Peluso JID Theoretical NA NA Poverty

Intra-Household D31, D63, I32

2009 Zhang et al. TRB Empirical Japan NA Intra-Household

Heterogeneity Bayesian

NA

2010 Amuedo-Dorantes et al. Working

Paper Empirical Denmark DHS/1999-2005

Income Pooling Household Production

D13, D14, J12

2010 Apps & Rees REHO Empirical Australia ATUS/2005-06 ABS/2003-04

Labor Supply Taxation

Time Allocation D13, D91, H31, J2

2010 Attanasio & Lechene Working

Paper Empirical Mexico Surveys/1998-99

Consumption Cash Transfers

QUAIDS NA

2010 Bargain et al. ESR Empirical Ireland IHBS/2005

Demand Sharing Rule

Costs of Children

D11, D12, C30, D36, I31, J12

2010 Bloemen EJ Empirical Netherlands SEP/1990-2001 Labor Supply

Non-participation Sharing Rule

NA

2010 Browning et al. EJ Theoretical NA NA Non-Cooperation

Public Good Game Separate Spheres

NA

2010 Cherchye et al. JET Theoretical NA NA Consumption


D11, D12, D13, C14

2010 Chiappori JET Theoretical NA NA Demand

Transferable Utility

C78, D11, D12

21

2010 Couprie et al. JPubE Empirical France FFES/2000 Expenditures

Inequality Sharing Functions

D63, D13, C14

2010 Hendy & Sofer Working

Paper Empirical Egypt ELMPS/2006

Labor Supply Females

Distribution Factors D11, D12, J22

2010 Linciano & Simmons Working

Paper Empirical UK BHPS/1992

Labor Supply Work Travel

NA

2010 Prabhu WD Empirical India Survey/2005-06 Intra-Household

Willingness To Pay

NA

2010 Yoon & Goulias TL Empirical US CSTS/2000-01 Time Allocation Intra-Household

Life Cycle NA

2011 Apps & Rees Chapter


Time Use Inequality Taxation

NA

2011 Basu & Ray Chapter

Book Empirical Nepal NLSS/1995

Woman’s Power Child Labor

NA

2011 Cherchye et al. RES Empirical Russia RLMS/1994-95-96-

98-00-01-02-03


Consumption Sharing Rule

D11, D12, D13, C14


Book Empirical Russia RMLS

Consumption Revealed

Preferences D11, D12, D13, C14


Book Survey NA NA

Revealed Preference

Tests NA

2011 Cherchye et al. EJ Empirical Russia RLMS/1994-95-96-

98-00-01-02-03

Revealed Preference

Consumption NA

2011 Chiappori REHO Theoretical NA NA

Labor Supply Consumption

Goods Identification

NA

2011 Chiappori & Ekeland ARE Theoretical NA NA Aggregation

Demand Pareto-Efficient

NA

2011 Dauphin et al. EJ Empirical UK FES/1982-93 Children under 16

QUAIDS Intra-Household

NA

22

2011 Donni & Chiappori Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Non-Unitary Models

NA

2011 Donni & Ponthieux TGS Survey NA NA Unitary/Collective

Models NA

2011 Gersbach & Haller JET Theoretical NA NA

General Equilibrium Household Formation

NA

2011 Lacroix & Radtchenko JOPE Empirical Russia RLMS/1994-2004 Sharing Rule

Intra-Household Economic Crisis

D1, J22, C5

2011 Lechene & Preston JET Theoretical NA NA Nash Equilibrium Intra-Household

Slutsky Symmetry D11, C72

2011 Lise & Seitz RES Empirical UK FES/1968-2001 Consumption

Marital Sorting Equivalence Scales

D12, D13, D31, J22

2011 de Palma et al. TD Empirical Germany Sessions/2005 Balance of Power

Experiments Intra-Household

NA

2011 Rapoport et al. JOPE Empirical France FrenchTUS/1998 Intra-Household

Home Production Labor Supply

D13, J22

2011 Talla Nobibon et al. CE Theoretical NA NA Revealed

Preference Graphs Colors

NA

2011 Zamora JOPE Empirical Spain EPF/1990-91 Intra-Household

Sharing Rule Engel Curve

D11, J22

2012 Bargain & Donni EER Empirical France INSEE/2000 Demand systems Cost of children

Indifference scales D11, D12, D36, I31, J12

2012 Browning & Gortz SJE Empirical Denmark DanishTUS/2001 Home Production Intra-Household

Time Use Money C3, D1, J1, J2

2012 Bruyneel et al. REHO Empirical NA 102 Undergr.

Students


Experimental Data C14, C92, D11, D12, D13

2012 Cherchye et al. AER Empirical Netherlands LISS Panel Labor Supply


D12, J12, J22

23

2012 Cherchye et al. EER Empirical Netherlands DCES/1978-2004 Well-being

Poverty Elderly Consumption

D11, D12, D13, D63, I31

2012 Chiappori et al. RES Theoretical NA NA

Theoretical restrictions Game

Theory Nash solution

NA

2012 Del Boca & Flinn JEcon Empirical US PSID/2005

Time Allocation Trigger Strategy

Household Proudction

C79, D19, J22

2012 Donni & Matteazzi AES Empirical US ATUS/2003-2006 Labor Supply

Home Production Identification

D13, J21, J22

2012 Haan & Myck AE Empirical Poland PHBS/2005 Labor Supply

Intra-Household Work Incentives

J22, I38, D13

2012 Lundberg Working

Paper Empirical Germany GSOEP

Personality Marriage Divorce

J22

2012 Mazzocco & Saini AER Empirical India ICRISAT/1975-85 Efficient

Risk Sharing J12, D86, G22, O12, O18,

R23 Z13

2012 Menon et al. EL Empirical Italy CISF/2009 Expenditure

Children Sharing Rule

C2,D1, D6, D7

2012 Sinha AsER Empirical India HDP/1994 Labor Supply

Bargaining Health

J22, C31, I15, D13

2012 Van Klaveren & Ghysels JLR Empirical Belgium FFCS/2004-05 Labor Supply

Child Care D12, D13, J22

2013 Bargain & Moreau JFEI Empirical France FHBS/2001

Labor Supply Bargaining Tax-benefit

Reform

NA

2013 Browning et al. RES Empirical Canada FAMEX/1974-1992 Consumption

Economies of Scale Bargaining Power

D11, D12, C30, I31, D63, J12

2013 Cherchye et al. ET Empirical NA 102 Underg.

Students

Consumption Revealed

Preferences Public/Private

D11, D12, D13, C14

2013 Cherchye et al. EJ Empirical Belguim 116 Economic

Students Nash Bargaining

Consumption NA

24

2013 Chiappori et al. Mimeo Empirical France Census/1999

Location Bargaining

Transportation Costs

NA

2013 Choo & Seitz Chapter

Book Empirical US Census/2000


Transfers NA

2013 Doss WBRO Survey NA NA Intra-Household

Bargaining Development

O12, O20, R2

2013 Dunbar et al. AER Empirical Malawi HIS/2005-2011

Children Resources

Consumption Child Poverty

I31, I32, J12, J13, O12, O15

2013 Fujii & Ishikawa REHO Theoretical NA NA Intra-Household

Bargaining Separability

C78, D01, D11

2013 Fujii & Ishikawa OBES Empirical Japan JPSC/1994-2002 Childbirth

Expenditure Intra-Household

NA

2013 Himmelweit et al. JMF Survey NA NA Sharing Resources

Gender Inequality

NA

2013 Loken et al. Dem Empirical Norway Administrative

Data/2006

Marriage Gender Residential

Location NA

2013 Martinez EDCC Empirical Chile CASEN/1990-92-

94-96-2000 Intra-Household

Bargaining Power NA

2013 Mazzocco et al. Mimeo Empirical US PSID/1968-96 Labor Supply

Wealth Dynamics Marriage

NA

2013 Ortigueira & Siassi JMonE Empirical US NA Labor Supply Risk Sharing

Unemployment NA

2013 Picard et al. IJTE Survey NA NA Transportation

Urban Economics Pareto Efficiency

NA

2014 Adams et al. AER Empirical Spain ECPF/1985-1997

Intertemporal Decisions, Revealed

Preferences

E24, F13, F16

25

2014 D’Aspremont & Dos Santos

ET Theoretical NA NA Cooperative and Noncooperative Nash Solution

C11, C72, H41

2014 Attanasio & Lechene JPE Empirical Mexico PROGRESA/

1998-1999

Consumption Cash Transfer Distribution

Factors

NA

2014 Bargain & Donni Economica Theoretical NA NA Consumption

Optimal Taxation Intra-Household

NA

2014 Bargain et al. JDE Empirical Côte d’Ivoire CILSS/2002 Intra-Household

Expenditures Child Poverty

D11, D12, D36, I31, J12

2014 Bertochhi et al. JEBO Empirical Italy SHIW/1989-2010 Intra-Household

Gender Financial Choices

J12, D13, E21, G11

2014 Boone et al. IZAJOLE Empirical US CEX/1998-2007 Consumption Labor Supply

Non-Cooperation D11, D12, D13

2014 Browning et al. Book NA NA NA Family Economics NA

2014 Del Boca & Flinn JET Empirical US PSID/2007 Marriage Market

Matching Time Allocation

D13, J12, J22

2014 Donni MSS Theoretical NA NA Bargaining

Risk Durable Goods

NA

2014 Inoa et al. Working

Paper Empirical France Paris

Location Commuting

Intra-Household R21, R31,C35

2014 Kebede et al. JAE Empirical Ethiopia 1,200 Couples Efficiency

Experiment Spouses’ Power

D13, C93, D03

2014 Lise & Yamada Working

Paper Empirical Japan JPSC/1993-2007

Consumption Leisure

Dynamic Commitment

D12, D13, J22

2014 Mangiavacchi & Rapallini

BER Empirical Italy ITUS/2002

Household Production Inequality Time Use

D13, J16, J22, 052

2014 Mazzocco et al. AERP&P Empirical US PSID/1968-96 Labor Supply

Dynamics Gender

NA

26

2014 Menon et al. AJAE Empirical Italy Survey/1997 Travel-Cost Model Non-Market Good Demand System

D13, H41,Q26, Q51

2014 de Palma et al. Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Transportation Negotiation Efficiency

NA

2014 Zhang JOPE Empirical US SIPP/2004-08 Labor Supply

Shocks Income Instability

D12, D13, D81, J22

2015 Beblo et al. AES Empirical France Germany 156 Couples/2010 Experiment Inequality

Social Norms C71,C91, C92, D13

2015 Bonke REHO Empirical Denmark DHES/1994-2004 Income Pooling Consumption

Marriage D13, D31, C82

2015 Caiumi EmpE Empirical Italy SHIW/1995 Cost of Children Demand System

Sharing Rule D12, D13, J22

2015 Cherchye et al Econome-

trica Empirical US PSID/1999-2009

Demand Sharing Rule

Revealed Preference

NA

2015 Chiappori & Meghir Chapter

Book Survey NA NA

Inequality Sharing Rule

NA

2015 Chaippori & Naidoo Mimeo Theoretical NA NA Engel Curves

Non-Cooperation Working-Leser

NA

2015 Chiappori et al. JDE Theoretical NA NA Becker-Coase Consumption Marital Status

NA

2015 Couprie & Ferrant AES Empirical UK UKTUS/2000 Welfare

Time Use Bargaining Power

D10, D13, D63, J12, J22

2015 Eckstein & Lifshitz IER Empirical US PSID/1983-93 Labor Supply

Married Women Household Games

NA

2015 Galichon & Salanié Working


Matching Marriage

Hedonic Prices C78, D61, C13

2015 Haddad EmpE Empirical Iran HES&ASY/2008 Intra-Household

Gender Ratio Divorce Rate

D13, J22

27

2015 Mizushima & Futagami JE Theoretical NA NA Public Goods

Household Games Time Allocation

D13, J24

2015 Naidoo Mimeo Theoretical NA NA Testing Pareto Public Goods

Non-Parametric D13, D7

2015 de Palma et al. ETrans Empirical France Paris Time Decision

Congestion Delay Costs

D11, D70, R41

2015 Smeulders et al. JME Theoretical NA NA

Weak Axiom Revealed

Preference Consumption

NA

2015 Smeulders et al. ETB Theoretical NA NA

Transitivity Weak Axiom

Revealed Preference

D11, D12, D13, C14

2015 Sofer & Thibout ES Empirical France FTUS/

1998-99 2010-11

Domestic Production Time Use Gender

D13, J16, J22

2015 Voena AER Empirical US PSID&NLSYM/196

8-93 & 1967-99

Divorce Laws Intertemporal

Well-being D13, D14, D91, J12, J16, K36

2015 Yilmazer & Lich REHO Empirical US HRS/1992-2006 Portfolio Choice

Risky Assets Bargaining Power

NA

2016 Blau & Goodstein LE Empirical US HRS/1992-1998-

2004

Commitment Inheritance

Labor Supply NA

2016 Browning et al. Mimeo

2016 Cherchye et al. Working

Paper Empirical US PSID/2013

Marriage Economies Scale

Revealed Preference

D11, D12, D13, J12

2016 Chiappori EJ Theoretical NA NA Indifference

Scales NA

2016 Cochard et al. REHO Empirical France 100 Couples/2008 Experiment Cooperation

Efficiency Equal C72, C91, D13

28

2016 Gutierrez Mimeo Empirical Mexico MxFLS/2002, 2005-

06, 2009-10

Sharing Model Deaton-Paxson Consumption

D13, J12, O15

2016 Lundberg et al. JEP Survey NA NA Inequality Marriage

Childbearing NA

2016 Radtchenko JFEI Empirical Russia RLMS/1995-1998 Inequality

Labor Supply Sharing Rule

NA

2016 Rodriguez WD Empirical NA UNICEF/

2000, 2010-11

Inequality Children

Well-being NA

2016 Talla Nobibon et al. OP Theoretical NA NA

Revealed Preference

Consumption Programming

NA

2016 Tommasi & Wolf Working

Paper Empirical Mexico PROGRESA

Demand System Sharing Rule

Cash Transfers D13, D11,D12,C31, I32

2017 Beblo & Beninger REHO Empirical Germany 95 couples Intra-Household

Consumption Experiment

C71, C91, C92, D12, D13, J16

2017 Bruyneel et al. QE Empirical NA 100 Children

Children’s Consumption


D11, D12, C14

2017 Cherchye et al. AER Empirical Denmark LISS/2012

Marriage Consumption

Revealed Preference

D60, D63, H21, H23, I38

2017 Chiappori & Mazzocco JEL Survey NA NA Static

Intertemporal Intra-Household

D11, D13, D15, I38

2017 Chiappori et al. AER Empirical US Census/2008-14 Consumption

Children’s Welfare Matching

D12, J12, J13, J15, J24

2017 Chiappori et al. EJ Empirical Canada GSS/2001 Alimony Rights

Cohabiting Matching

NA

2017 Bütikofer & Gerfin REHO Empirical Switzerland LWS/2000-2008 Sharing Rule

Equivalence Scale Subjective Data

D12, C21, D19

29

2017 Couprie et al. Working

Paper Empirical France

81 Couples/ 2012-13

Experiment Stereotypes

Gender Roles D13, J16, J22, C91,C92

2017 Dunbar et al. Mimeo Empirical Malawi HIS/2005-2011 Costs of Children

Sharing Rule Demand Systems

D13, D11, D12, C31, I32

2017 Goussé et al. Econome-

trica Empirical UK BHPS/1991-2008

Assortative Matching Gender

Social Norms

NA

2017 Goussé et al. LE Empirical UK BHPS/1991-2008 Labor Supply Assortative Matching

C78, D83, J12, J22

2017 Lyssiotou EmpE Empirical UK FES/1991-93 Child Benefits Labor Supply Public Goods

D12, I38, J16, J18, J22, H31

2017 Matteazzi et al. AEPP Empirical Italy ISMEA/1995 Farm-Household


D11, D12, D13

2017 Porter JDE Empirical China CLHLS/1998-2009 Caring

Elderly Parents Sex Ratios

NA

2017 Stieglitz et al. EvHD Empirical Bolivia 53 Couples Experiment

Sexual Division Labor

NA

2018 Armand et al. Working

Paper Empirical Macedonia MLSP/2010-11

Gender Expenditure

D12, D13, E21, O12

2018 Bargain et al. Mimeo Empirical UK FES/1978 Costs of Children

QUAIDS Sharing Resources

NA

2018 Campaña et al. Working

Paper Empirical Mexico Colombia TUS/2009 2012


Bargaining Power D10 J22

2018 Chavas et al. TE Empirical Italy HBS/2007 Consumption

Welfare Inequality

D11, D12, D13

2018 Chiappori REHO Theoretical NA NA Labor Supply

Samuelson Randomized

D11, D12, D13

2018 Chiappori et al. REHO Empirical Russia RLMS/1995-2013 Divorce

Marriage Matching

J12, D1

30

2018 Cochard et al. EE Empirical France 238 Individuals/

2010-16

Experiment Time Allocation Work Division

D13, C99, J16

2018 Cosaert & Demuynck RESt Empirical US CEX/1994-2007 Non-Parametric Welfare Demand

Heterogeneity NA

2018 Dauphin et al. REHO Empirical Burkina Faso Survey CECI/1999 Consumption

QUAIDS Polygamy

D1, D7, J12

2018 Flinn et al. EER Empirical Australia HILDA/2001-16 Gender Wage Differentials

Time Allocations D1, J12, J16, J22, J31, J71

2018 Manzini & Mariotti JET Theoretical NA NA Stochastic Choice Attraction Effect Similarity Effect

D03, D01

2018 Menon et al. REHO Empirical Italy HES/2002-03-04 Demand System

Sharing Rule Alcohol

C31, C34, C51, D12, D13

2018 Molina et al. Working

Paper Empirical US PSID/1997-15

Intertemporal Labor Supply

D15, J22

2018 Molina et al. Working

Paper Empirical US ATUS/2003-15

Welfare Inequality

Labor Supply D15, J22

2018 Tommasi & Wolf EL Theoretical NA NA Demand System

Sharing Rule Shrinkage

D13, D11, D12, C31, I32

Forthcoming d’Aspremont et al. ET Theoretical NA NA Semi-Cooperation

Revealed Preference

D11, C72, H41

Forthcoming Bargain & Martinoty JOPE Empirical Spain EPF/2006-11 Mancession

Intra-Household Unemployment

NA

Forthcoming Bloemen JBES Empirical Netherlands SEP/1990-2002 Labor Supply

Intra-Household Taxation

NA

Forthcoming Donni & Matteazzi JAEcon Empirical US PSID/2009 Labor Supply

Non-Participation NA

Forthcoming Galichon et al. JPE Theoretical NA NA Matching

Transferable Utility Heterogeneity

NA

Forthcoming Molina et al. REHO Empirical Spain 55 three-generation families, 165 indiv./

2017

Intra-Household Intergenerational

Experiment D03, D64, D70

31

Short-terms of Journals: AERAE= Actualité Économique: Revue d’Analyse Économique AER = American Economic Review AERP&P = American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings AJAE = American Journal of Agricultural Economics AES = Annals of Economics and Statistics ARE = Annual Review of Economics AEPP = Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy AE = Applied Economics AEL = Applied Economics Letters AEQ = Applied Economics Quarterly AFE = Applied Financial Economics AsER = Asian Economic Review AEP = Australian Economic Papers BER = Bulletin of Economic Research CESR = Cahiers d’Économie et Sociologie Rurales CJE = Canadian Journal of Economics CPP = Canadian Public Policy CESifo = CESifo Economic Studies ChER = China Economics Review CE = Computational Economics Dem = Demography DE = Developing Economies EJ = Economic Journal ER = Economic Record ET = Economic Theory ETB = Economic Theory Bulletin EDCC = Economic Development and Cultural Change ESR = Economic and Social Review EHB = Economics and Human Behaviors EL = Economics Letters ETrans= Economics of Transportation EP = Economie & Prévision EmpE = Empirical Economics EER = European Economic Review EvHB = Evolution and Human Behavior ExE = Experimental Economics FE = Feminist Economics FS = Fiscal Studies HE = Health Economics IER = International Economic Review IJTE = International Journal of Transport Economics IZADP = Institute of Labor Economics Discussion Papers IZAJLE = Institute of Labor Economics Journal of Labor Economics IE = Investigaciones Económicas JAE = Journal of African Economies JAEcon = Journal of Applied Econometrics JBES = Journal of Business and Economic Statistics JDE = Journal of Demographic Economics JDevE = Journal of Development Economics

32

JDevS = Journal of Development Studies JEBO = Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization JEH = Journal of Economic History JEL = Journal of Economic Literature JEP = Journal of Economic Perspectives JES = Journal of Economic Surveys JET = Journal of Economic Theory JE = Journal of Economics JEcon = Journal of Econometrics JFEI = Journal of Family and Economic Issues JHR = Journal of Human Resources JMF = Journal of Marriage and Family JME = Journal of Mathematical Economics JMonE= Journal of Monetary Economics JOLE = Journal of Labor Economics JLR= Journal of Labor Research JPE = Journal of Political Economy JOPE = Journal of Population Economics JPubE = Journal of Public Economics JPubET = Journal of Public Economy Theory JRU = Journal of Risk and Uncertainty JSED = Journal of Social and Economic Development LE = Labour Economics OR = Operations Research OBES = Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics OEP = Oxford Economic Papers QE = Quantitative Economics QJE = Quarterly Journal of Economics REI = Research on Economic Inequality RE = Research in Economics RED = Review of Economic Dynamics RES = Review of Economic Studies REHO = Review of Economics of the Household RESt = Review of Economics and Statistics RIW = Review of Income and Wealth RevE = Revue Économique RiE = Ricerche Economiche RPE = Rivista di Politica Economica SJE = Scandinavian Journal of Economics SEJ = Southern Economic Journal SFP = Studies in Family Planning TD = Theory and Decision TE = Theoretical Economics TL = Transportation Letters TGS = Travail, Genre et Sociétés TRB = Transportation Research Part B: Methodological WB = The World Bank WBER = World Bank Economic Review WBRO = World Bank Research Observer WD = World Development

33

REFERENCES

Adam, C., Hoddinott, J., Ligon, E. (2004). Dynamic intra-household bargaining, matrimonial

property law, and suicide in Canada. In: Quisumbing, A. (ed.). Household Decisions,

Gender, and Development. Washington: DC: IFPRI.

Adams A., Cherchye, L., De Rock B. and Verriest E. (2014). Consume now or later? Time

inconsistency, collective choice and revealed preference. American Economic Review 104:

4147-4183.

Agarwal, B. (1997). Bargaining and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist

Economics 3: 1-51.

Alessie, R., Crossley, T., and Hildebrand, V. (2006). Estimating a collective household model with

survey data on financial satisfaction. WP 06/19. Institute for Fiscal Studies.

Alderman, H., Chiappori, P.A., Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J., and Kanbur, R. (1995). Unitary versus

collective models of the household: is it time to shift the burden of the proof. World Bank

Research Observer 10: 1-19.

Allgood, S. (2009). The collective household, household production and efficiency of marginal

reforms. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 11: 749-771.

Amuedo-Dorantes, C., Bonke, J., and Grossbard, S. (2010). Income pooling and household division

of labor: evidence from Danish couples. IZA DP No. 5418. IZA Institute of Labor

Economics.

Andreoni J., Brown, E., and Rischall, I. (2003). Charitable giving by married couples. Who decides

and why does it matter? Journal of Human Resources 38: 111-133.

Angrist, J. (2002). How do sex ratios affect marriage and labor markets? Evidence from America’s

second generation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 997-1038.

Apps, R., and Rees, R. (1996). Labour supply, household production and intra-family welfare

distribution. Journal of Public Economics 60: 199-219.

Apps, R., and Rees, R. (1997). Collective labor supply and household production. Journal of

Political Economy 105: 178-190.

Apps, P., and Rees R. (1999). On the taxation of trade within and between households. Journal of

Public Economics 73: 241-263.

Apps, P., and Rees, R. (2002). Household production, full consumption and the costs of children.

Labour Economics 8: 621-648.

34

Apps, P., and Rees, R. (2007). Cooperative household models. IZA DP No. 3127. IZA Institute of

Labor Economics.

Apps, P., and Rees, R. (2010). Family labor supply, taxation and saving in an imperfect capital

market. Review of Economics of the Household 8: 297-323.

Apps, P., and Rees, R. (2011). Household time use, inequality and taxation. In: Molina, A. (ed.).

Household Economic Behaviors. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

Arias, C., Atella, V., Castagnini, R., and Perali, F. (2003). Estimation of the sharing rule between

adults and children and related equivalence scales within a collective consumption

framework. In: Dagum C. and Ferrari, G. (eds). Household Behavior, Equivalence Scales,

Welfare and Poverty. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

Armand, A., Attanasio, O., Carneiro, P. and Lechene, V. (2018). The effect of gender-targeted

conditional cash transfers on household expenditures: Evidence from a randomized

experiment. CEMMAP working paper CWP 33/18. University College of London.

Aronsson, T., Daunfeldt, S.O. and Wikstrom, M. (2001). Estimating intrahousehold allocation in a

collective model with household production. Journal of Population Economics 14: 569-

584.

Ashraf, N. (2009). Spousal control and intra-household decision making: An experimental study in

the Philippines. American Economic Review 99: 1245-77.

d’Aspremont, C., and Dos Santos Ferreira, R. (2014). Household behavior and individual

autonomy: An extended Lindahl mechanism. Economic Theory 55: 643–664.

d’Aspremont, C., and Dos Santos Ferreira, R. (Forthcoming). Enlarging the collective model of

household behavior: A revealed preference analysis. Economic Theory.

Attanasio, O., and Lechene, V. (2002). Tests of income pooling in household decisions. Review of

Economic Dynamics 5: 720-748.

Attanasio, O., and Lechene, V. (2010). Conditional cash transfers, women and the demand for food.

WP 10/17. Institute for Fiscal Studies.

Attanasio, O., and Lechene, V. (2014). Efficient responses to targeted cash transfers. Journal of


Aura, S. (2005). Does the balance of power within a family matter? The case of the Retirement

Equity Act. Journal of Public Economics 89: 1699–1717.

Aura, S. (2007). Uncommitted couples: some efficiency and policy implications of marital

bargaining. Mimeo. University of Missouri.

Bargain, O., Beblo, M., Beninger, D., Blundell, R., Carrasco, R., Chiuri, M.C., Laisney, F., Lechene,

V., Moreau, N., Myck, M., Ruiz-Castillo, J. and Vermeulen, F. (2006). Does the

representation of household behavior matter for welfare analysis of tax-benefit policies?

An introduction. Review of Economics of the Household 4: 99-111.

35

Bargain, O., Donni, O. and Gbakou, M. (2010). The measurement of child costs: Evidence from

Ireland. Economic and Social Review 41: 1-20.

Bargain, O., and Donni, O. (2012). Expenditure on children: A Rothbarth-type method consistent

with scale economies and parents’ bargaining. European Economic Review 56: 792-813.

Bargain, O., and Donni, O. (2014). Optimal commodity taxation and redistribution within

households. Economica 81: 48-62.

Bargain, O., Donni, O., and Kwenda, P. (2014). Intrahousehold Distribution and Child Poverty:

Theory and Evidence from Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Development Economics 107: 262-276.

Bargain, O., Donni, O., and Hentati, I. (2018). Resource sharing in households with children: A

generalized model and empirical evidence from the UK. Mimeo. Université de Cergy-

Pontoise.

Bargain, O., and Martinoty, L. (Forthcoming). Crisis at home: Mancession-induced change in

intrahousehold distribution. Journal of Population Economics.

Bargain, O., and Moreau, N. (2006). Effets d’une réforme fiscale sur l’offre de travail des ménages

dans un cadre collectif simulé. Actualité Économique : Revue d’Analyse Économique 82:

207-246

Bargain, O. and Moreau, N. (2007). Does taxation affect intra-household distribution? A Simulation

Approach. In: Y. Amiel and J. Bishop (eds). Research on Economic Inequality 14: 317-344.

Bargain, O., and Moreau, N. (2013). The impact of tax-benefit reforms on labor supply in a

simulated Nash-bargaining framework. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 34: 77-86.

Barmby, T., and Smith, N. (2001). Household labour supply in Britain and Denmark: some

interpretations using a model of Pareto optimal behaviour. Applied Economics 33: 1109-

1116.

Basu, K. (2006). Gender and say: a model of household behaviour with endogenously determined

balance of power. The Economic Journal 116: 558-580.

Basu, K., and Ray, R. (2011). The collective model of the household and an unexpected implication

for child labor: hypothesis and an empirical test. In: Dhar A. (ed.). Some Contemporary

Issues in Development and Growth Economics. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.

Bayudan, C. (2006). Wives’ time allocation and intrahousehold power: evidence from the

Philippines. Applied Economics 38: 789-804.

Beblo, M. (2001). Bargaining over time allocation: Economic modeling and econometric

investigation of time use within families. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

Beblo, M., and Beninger, D. (2017). Do husbands and wives pool their incomes? A couple

experiment. Review of Economics of the Household 15: 779–805.

36

Beblo, M., Beninger, D., Cochard, F., Couprie, H., and Hopfensitz, A. (2015). Equality and

efficiency trade-off within French and German couples: a comparative experimental

study. Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 117-118: 233-252.

Beblo, M., Beninger, D., and Laisney, F. (2004). Family tax splitting: a microsimulation of its

potential labour supply and intra-household welfare effects in Germany. Applied

Economics Quarterly 50: 231-248.

Beegle, K., Frankenberg, E., and Thomas, D. (2001). Bargaining power within couples and use of

prenatal and delivery care in Indonesia. Studies in Family Planning 32: 130-146.

Behrman, J. (1997). Intrahousehold distribution and the family. In: Rosenzweig, M., and Stark, O.,

Handbook of Population and Family Economics 1A: 125-187, Elsevier.

Behrman, J., and Rosenzweig, M. (1998). In-law resources and distribution within marriage. PARC

Working Paper Series WPS 98-18

Beninger, D., Bargain, O., Beblo, M., Blundell, R., Carrasco, R., Chiuri, M.C., Laisney, F., Lechene,

V., Longobardi, E., Moreau, N., Myck, M., Ruiz-Castillo, J., and F. Vermeulen (2006).

Evaluating the move to a linear tax system in Germany and other European countries.

Review of Economics of the Household 4: 159-180.

Beninger, D., and Laisney, F. (2006). On the performance of unitary models of household labor

supply estimated on “collective” data with taxation. Cahiers d’Économie et Sociologie

Rurales 81: 5-36.

Beninger, D., Laisney, F., and Beblo, M. (2007). Welfare analysis of a tax reform for Germany: a

comparison of the unitary and collective models of household labour spppy. Journal of

Population Economics 20: 869-893.

Bertochhi, G., Brunetti, M., and Torricelli C. (2014). Who holds the purse strings within the

household? The determinants of intra-family decision making. Journal of Economic

Behavior & Organization 101: 65-86.

Biswal, U. (1999). Testing the family “common preference” model for immigrant and non-

immigrant women’s labour supply. Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques 25

(Supplement: Women in the Canadian Labour Market): S95-S114.

Blacklow, P., and Ray, R. (2003). Intra-household resource allocation, consumer preferences and

commodity tax reforms: Australian Evidence. Economic Record 79: 425-433.

Blau, D.M., and Goodstein, R.M. (2016). Commitment in the household: evidence from the effect of

inheritances on the labor supply of older married couples. Labour Economics 42: 123-137.

Bloemen, H.G. (2010). An empirical model of collective household labour supply with non-

participation. The Economic Journal 120: 183-214.

Bloemen, H.G. (forthcoming). Collective labor supply, taxes, and intrahousehold allocation: An

empirical approach, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics.

37

Blundell, R., Chiappori, P.A., and Meghir, C. (2005). Collective labor supply with children. Journal

of Political Economy 113: 1277-1306.

Blundell, R., Chiappori, P.A., Magnac, T., and Meghir, C. (2007). Collective labour supply:

heterogeneity and non-participation. Review of Economic Studies 74: 417-445.

Blundell, R., and Robin, J.M. (2000). Latent separability: Grouping goods without weak

separability. Econometrica 68: 53-84

Bobonis, G. (2009). Is the allocation of resources within the household efficient? New evidence

from a randomized experiment. Journal of Political Economy 117 (3): 453–503.

Bonke, J. (2015). Pooling of income and sharing of consumption within households. Review of

Economics of the Household 13: 73-93.

Bonke, J., and Browning, M. (2009). The allocation of expenditures within the household: A new

survey. Fiscal Studies 30: 461-481.

Bonke, J., and Browning, M. (2009). The distribution of financial well-being and income within the

household. Review of Economics of the Household 7: 31-42.

Bonke, J., and Browning, M. (2009). Spending on children: direct survey evidence. The Economic

Journal 121: F123-F143.

Bonke, J., and Uldall-Poulsen, H. (2007). Why do families actually pool their income? Evidence

from Denmark. Review of Economics of the Household 5: 113–128.

Boone, J., van der Wiel, K., van Soest, A.. and Vermeulen F. (2014). Kinky choices, dictators and

split might: a non-cooperative model for household consumption and labor supply. IZA

Journal of Labor Economics 3: 1-19.

Borelli S., and Perali F. (2004). Drug Consumption and Intra-Household Distribution of Resources:

The Case of Qat in an African Society. In: Dagum C., Ferrari G. (eds) Household

Behaviour, Equivalence Scales, Welfare and Poverty. Contributions to Statistics.

Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

Bouis, H.E., and Peña, C.L. (1997). Inequality in the intrafamily distribution of food: the dilemma

of defining an individual’s “fair share”. In: Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H.

(eds). Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Methods, models, and

policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Bourguignon, F. (1999). The cost of children: may the collective approach to household behavior

help? Journal of Population Economics 12: 503-521.

Bourguignon, F., Browning, M., and Chiappori, P.A. (2009). Efficient intra-household allocations

and distribution factors: implications and identification. Review of Economic Studies 76:

503-528. Publication of the older working paper (which contained different results):

Bourguignon, F., Browning, M., and Chiappori, P.A. (1995). The collective approach to

household behavior. WP-95-04. DELTA.

38

Bourguignon, F., Browning, M., Chiappori, P.A., and Lechene, V. (1993). Intra-household

allocation of consumption: a model and some evidence from French data. Annales

d’Économie et de Statistique 29: 237-156.

Bourguignon, F., and Chiappori, P.A. (1992). Collective models of household behavior: an

introduction. European Economic Review 36: 355-364.

Bourguignon, F., and Chiuri, M.C. (2005). Labor market time and home production: a new test for

collective models of intra-household allocation. WP No. 131. Center for Economic Studies

and Finance.

Bradbury, B. (1996). Household income sharing, joint consumption and the expenditure patterns of

Australian retired couples and single people. SPRC Disc. Paper 66, University of New

South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.

Bradbury, B. (2004). Consumption and the within-household income distribution: outcomes from

an Australian “natural experiment”, CESifo Economic Studies 50: 501–540

Brett, C. (1998). Tax reform and family decision-making. Journal of Public Economics 70: 425-440.

Browning, M. (1995). Saving and the intra-household distribution of income: an empirical

investigation. Ricerche Economiche 48: 277-292.

Browning, M. (2000). The saving behaviour of a two person household. Scandinavian Journal of

Economics 102: 235-251.

Browning, M., Bourguignon, F., Chiappori, P.A., and Lechene, V. (1994). Income and outcomes: a

structural model of intra-household allocation. Journal of Political Economy 102: 1067-

1096.

Browning, M., and Chiappori, P.A. (1998). Efficient intra-household allocations: a general

characterization and empirical tests. Econometrica 66: 1241-1278.

Browning, M., Chiappori, P.A., and Lechene, V. (2006). Collective and unitary models: a

clarification. Review of Economics of the Household 4: 5-14.

Browning, M., Chiappori, P.A., and Lechene, V. (2010). Distributional Effects in Household

Models: Separate Spheres and Income Pooling. The Economic Journal: 120: 786-799.

Browning, M., Chiappori, P.A., and Lewbel, A. (2013). Estimating consumption economies of scale,

adult equivalence scales, and household bargaining power. The Review of Economic

Studies 80: 1267-1303.

Browning, M., Chiappori, P.A. and Weiss, Y. (2014). Family economics. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Browning M., Donni, O., and Gørtz, M. (2016). Do you have time to take a walk together? Private

and joint leisure within the household. Mimeo. Oxford University.

39

Browning, M., and Gørtz, M. (2012). Spending time and money within the household. The

Scandinavian Journal of Economics 114: 681-704.

Browning, M., and Lechene, V. (2001). Caring and sharing: tests between alternative models of

intra-household allocation. Discussion Paper No 01-07. University of Copenhagen.

Bruce, J., and Lloyd, C.B. (1997). Finding the ties that bind: beyond headship and household. In:

Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds). Intrahousehold resource allocation in

developing countries: Methods, models, and policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University

Press.

Bruyneel, S., Cherchye, L., Cosaert, S., De Rock, B., and Dewitte, S. (2017). Measuring the

willingness-to-pay for others’ consumption: An application to joint decisions of children.

Quantitative Economics 8: 1037-1082.

Bruyneel, S., Cherchye, L., and De Rock, B. (2012). Collective consumption models with restricted

bargaining weights: an empirical assessment based on experimental data. Review of

Economics of the Household 10 : 395-421.

Bustreel, A. (2001). La rationalité de la non-spécialisation dans les ménages. Une rupture avec la

théorie beckérienne. Revue Économique 52: 1157-1183.

Bütikofer, A., and Gerfin, M. (2017). The economies of scale of living together and how they are

shared: estimates based on a collective household model. Review of Economics of the

Household 15: 433-453.

Caiumi, A., and Perali, F. (2015). Who Bears the Full Cost of Children? Evidence from a collective

demand system. Empirical Economics 49: 33-64.

Campaña, J.C., Giménez-Nadal, J.I., and Molina, J.A. (2018). Efficient Labor Suppy for Latin

Families: Is the Intra-household Bargaining Power Relevant? IZA Discussion Papers

11695, Institute of Labor Economics.

Carter, M.R., and Katz, E.G. (1997). Separate spheres and the conjugal contract: understanding the

impact of gender-biased development. In: Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H.

(eds). Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Methods, models, and

policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Carvajal, A., and González, N. (2004). On refutability of the Nash bargaining solution. Journal of

Mathematical Economics 50, 177-186.

Chau, T.W., Li, H., Liu, P.W., and Zhang, J. (2007). Testing the collective model of household labor

supply: evidence from China. China Economic Review 18: 389-402.

Chavas, J.-P., Menon, M, Pagani, E., and Perali, F. (2018). Collective household welfare and intra-

household inequality. Theoretical Economics 13: 667-696.

Chen, Z., and Woolley, F. (2001). A Cournot-Nash model of family decision making. The Economic

Journal 111: 722–748.

40

Cherchye, L., Crawford, I., De Rock B., and Vermeulen, F. (2009). The revealed preference

approach to demand. In: Slottje, D. (ed.). Quantifying Consumer Preferences: Estimating

Demand Systems. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Lewbel, A., and Vermeulen, F. (2015). Sharing rule identification for

general collective consumption models. Econometrica 83: 2001-2041.

Cherchye, L., De Rock B., and Platino, V. (2013). Private versus public consumption within groups:

testing the nature of goods from aggregate data. Economic Theory 54: 485-500.

Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Sabbe J., and Vermeulen, F. (2008). Nonparametric tests of collectively

rational consumption behavior: an integer programming procedure. Journal of

Econometrics 147: 258-265.

Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Surana, K., and Vermeulen, F. (2016). Marital matching, economies of

scale and intra-household allocations. IZA DP No. 10242. IZA Institute of Labor

Economics.

Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2007). The collective model of household

consumption: a non-parametric characterization. Econometrica 75: 553-574.

Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2009). Opening the black box of intra-household

decision-making; theory and non-parametric empirical tests of general collective

consumption models. Journal of Political Economy 117: 1074-1104.

Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen F. (2010). An Afriat theorem for the collective model of

household consumption. Journal of Economic Theory 145: 1142–1163.

Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2011). The revealed preference approach to

collective consumption behaviour: testing and sharing rule recovery. Review of Economic

Studies 78: 176-198.

Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2011). Collective household consumption behavior:

Revealed preference analysis. Foundations and Trends® in Econometrics 4: 225-312.

Hanover, MA: Now Publishers.

Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2012). Economic well-being and poverty among the

elderly: an analysis based on a collective consumption model. European Economic

Review 56: 985-1000.

Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2012). Married with children. A collective labor

supply model with detailed time use and intrahousehold expenditure information.

American Economic Review 102: 3377-3405

Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Vermeulen, F., and Verriest, E. (2011). Revealed preference tests for

collective behavior. In: Molina, J.A. (ed.). Household Economic Behaviors. Berlin: Springer

Verlag.

41

Cherchye, L., Demuynck, T., and De Rock, B. (2011). Revealed preference analysis of

noncooperative household consumption. The Economic Journal 121: 1073–1096.

Cherchye, L., Demuynck, T., and De Rock, B. (2013). Nash bargained consumption decisions: a

revealed preference analysis. The Economic Journal 123: 195-235.

Cherchye, L., Demuynck, T., De Rock, B., and Vermeulen, F. (2017). Household consumption when

the marriage is stable. American Economic Review 107: 1507–1534.

Cherchye, L., and Vermeulen, F. (2008). Nonparametric analysis of household labor supply:

goodness-of-fit and power of the unitary and the collective model. Review of Economics

and Statistics 90: 267-274.

Chiappori, P.A. (1988). Rational household labor supply. Econometrica 56 : 63-89.

Chiappori, P.A. (1990). La fonction de demande agrégée en biens collectifs : théorie et application.

Annales d’Economie et de Statistiques 19 : 1990, 27-42.

Chiappori, P.A. (1992). Collective labour supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy 100:

437-467.

Chiappori, P.A. (1994). The collective approach to household behavior. In: Blundell, R., Preston I.,

and Walker, J. (eds). The measurement of household welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Chiappori, P.A. (1997). Introducing household production in collective models of labor supply.

Journal of Political Economy 105: 191-209.

Chiappori, P.A. (1997). Collective models of household behavior : the sharing rule approach. In:



Press.

Chiappori, P.A. (1999). Labor supply and efficient risk sharing. Mimeo. University of Chicago.

Chiappori, P.A. (2005). Modèle collectif et analyse de bien-être. Actualité Économique : Revue

d’Analyse Économique 81 (3) : 405-419.

Chiappori, P.A. (2010). Testable implications of transferable utility. Journal of Economic Theory

145: 1302-1317.

Chiappori, P.A. (2011). Collective labor supply with many consumption goods. Review of


Chiappori, P.A. (2016). Equivalence versus indifference scales. The Economic Journal 126: 523-545.

Chiappori, P.A. (2018). Randomized household labor supply. Review of Economics of the

Household (Special issue in honor of Angus Deaton) 16: 171-188.

Chiappori, P.A., Bundell, R., and Meghir, C. (2005) Collective labour supply with children. Journal

of Political Economy 113(6): 1277-1306.

42

Chiappori, P.A. and Donni, O. (2006). Les modèles non-unitaires de comportement du ménage : un

survol de la littérature. Actualité Économique : Revue d’Analyse Économique 82 : 9-52.

Chiappori, P.A., Donni, O., and Komunjer, I. (2012). Learning from a piece of pie. Review of

Economic Studies 79: 162-195.

Chiappori, P.A., and Ekeland, I. (1999). Aggregation and market demand: An exterior

differential calculus viewpoint. Econometrica 67: 1435-58

Chiappori, P.A., and Ekeland, I. (2006). The microeconomics of group behavior: General

characterization. Journal of Economic Theory 130: 1-26.

Chiappori, P.A., and Ekeland, I. (2009). The microeconomics of efficient group behavior:

identification. Econometrica 77: 763-799.

Chiappori, P.A., and Ekeland, I. (2009). The economics and mathematics of aggregation.

Foundations and Trends® in Microeconomics 5: 1-151. Hanover, MA: Now Publishers.

Chiappori, P.A., and Ekeland, I. (2011). New developments in aggregation economics. Annual

Review of Economics 3: 631-668.

Chiappori, P.A., Fortin, B., and Lacroix, G. (2002). Marriage market, divorce legislation, and

household labor supply. Journal of Political Economy 110: 37-72.

Chiappori, P.A. and Kim, J.H. (2018). A note on identifying heterogeneous sharing rules.

Quantitative Economics, 8: 201-218.

Chiappori, P.A. and Mazzocco, M. (2017). Static and intertemporal household decisions. Journal of

Economic Literature 55: 985-1045.

Chiappori, P.A., and Meghir, C. (2015). Intrahousehold inequality. In: Atkinson A.B., and

Bourguignon F. (eds). Handbook of Economic Inequality 2: 1369-1418.

Chiappori, P.A., Iyigun, M., Lafortune, J., and Weiss, Y. (2016). Changing the rules midway: the

impact of granting alimony rights on existing and newly-formed partnerships. Economic

Journal 127: 1874-1905.

Chiappori, P.A., Iyigun, M., and Weiss, Y. (2015). The Becker-Coase Theorem Reconsidered,

Journal of Demographic Economics 81(2): 157-77.

Chiappori, P.A., and Naidoo, J. (2015). Noncooperative Engel Curves: A Characterization. Mimeo.

Columbia University.

Chiappori, P.A., and Oreffice, S. (2008). Birth control and female empowerment: An equilibrium

analysis. Journal of Political Economy 116: 113-140.

Chiappori, P.A., de Palma, A., Picard, N., and Inoa, I.A. (2013). Couple residential location and

spouses workplaces. Mimeo. Université de Cergy-Pontoise.

Chiappori, P.A., Radtchenko, N., and Salanié, B. (2018). Divorce and the Duality of Marital Payoff.

Review of Economics of the Household 16: 833-858.

43

Chiappori, P.A., Salanié B., and Weiss, Y. (2017). Partner Choice, Investment in Children, and the

Marital College Premium. American Economic Review 107: 2109-67.

Chiuri, M.C. (2000). Quality and Demand of Child Care and Female Labour Supply in Italy.

Labour 14: 97-118.

Chiuri, M.C. (2000). Individual decisions and household demand for consumption and leisure.

Research in Economics 54: 277-324.

Chiuri, M.C., and Simmons, P.J. (1997). Universal decentralization: a demand system for collective

and unitary models with household public goods. The Economic Journal 107: 372-389.

Choo, E., and Siow, A. (2006). Who marries whom and why. Journal of Political Economy, 114:

175-201.

Choo, E., and Seitz, S. (2013). The collective marriage matching model: Identification, estimation,

and testing. In: Choo E. and Shum, M. (eds). Structural Econometric Models (Advances in

Econometrics, Volume 31). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Clark, A., Couprie, H., and Sofer C. (2004). La modélisation collective de l’offre de travail : mise en

perspective et application aux données britanniques. Revue Économique 55: 767-790.

Cochard, F., Couprie, H. and Hopfensitz, A. (2016). Do spouses cooperate? An experimental

investigation. Review of Economics of the Household 14: 1-26.

Cochard, F., Couprie, H. and Hopfensitz, A. (2018). What if women earned more than their

spouse? An experimental investigation of work division in the couple. Experimental

Economics 21: 50-71.

Cosaert, S., and Demuynck, T. (2018). Nonparametric welfare and demand analysis with

unobserved individual heterogeneity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 100: 349-

361.

Couprie, H. (2007). Time allocation within the family: welfare implications of life in a couple. The

Economic Journal 117: 287-305.

Couprie, H., Cudeville, E., and Sofer, C. (2017). Efficiency versus stereotypes: an experiment upon

domestic production. Working Paper THEMA No 2015-06. Université de Cergy-Pontoise.

Couprie, H., and Ferrant, G. (2015). Welfare comparisons, economies of scales and equivalence

scale in time use. Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 117-118: 185-210.

Couprie, H., Peluso, E., and Trannoy, A. (2010). Is power more evenly balanced in poor

households? Journal of Public Economics 7-8: 493-507.

Crespo, L. (2009). Estimation and testing of household labour supply models: evidence from Spain.

Investigaciones Económicas 33: 303-335.

Daunfeldt, S.O., and Hellstrom, J. (2007). Intra-household allocation of time to household

production activities: Evidence from Swedish household data. Labour 21 : 189-207.

44

Dauphin A., El Lahga, A.R., Fortin, B., and Lacroix, G. (2006). Choix de consommation des

ménages en présence de plusieurs décideurs. Actualité Économique: Revue d’Analyse

Économique 82 (1-2) : 87-118.

Dauphin, A., El Lahga, A.R., Fortin, B., and Lacroix, G. (2011). Are children decision-makers within

the household? The Economic Journal 121: 871-903

Dauphin, A., and Fortin, B. (2001) A test of collective rationality for multi-person households.

Economics Letters 71: 211-216.

Dauphin, A., Fortin, B. and Lacroix, G (2018). Is consumption efficiency within households

falsifiable? Review of Economics of the Household 16: 737-766.

Deaton, A. (1989). Looking for boy-girl discrimination in household expenditure data. World Bank

Economic Review 3: 1-15.

Deaton, A. (1997). The analysis of household surveys : a microeconometric approach to

development policy. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

Deb, R. (2009). A testable model of consumption with externalities, Journal of Economic Theory

144: 1804-1816.

Del Boca, D., and Flinn, C. (2012). Endogenous household interaction, Journal of Econometrics 166,

49-65.

Del Boca, D., and Flinn, C. (2014). Household behavior and the marriage market, Journal of

Economic Theory 150, 515-550.

Dercon, S., and Krishnan, P. (2000). In sickness and in health: Risk sharing within households in

rural Ethiopia. Journal of Political Economy 108: 688-727.

Dey Abbas, J. (1997). Gender asymmetries in intrahousehold resource allocations in Sub-Saharan

Africa: some policy implications for land and labor productivity. In: Haddad, L.,

Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds). Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing

countries: Methods, models, and policy. Baltimore : John Hopkins University Press.

Dietrich, J. (2008). Testing unitary and bargaining models of Chinese household food

consumption. Applied Financial Economics, 18: 397-410.

Donni O. (2000). Essais sur les modèles collectifs de comportement du ménage. Ph. D. Thesis.

Paris : École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.

Donni, O. (2003). Collective household labor supply: non-participation and income taxation.

Journal of Public Economics 87: 1179-1198.

Donni, O. (2006). Collective consumption and welfare. Canadian Journal of Economics 39 : 124-144.

Donni, O. (2006). Les modèles non-coopératifs d’offre de travail : théorie et évidence. Actualité

Économique : Revue d’Analyse Économique 82 : 181-206.

45

Donni, O. (2007). Collective female labour supply: theory and application. The Economic Journal

117 : 94-119.

Donni, O. (2007). Choix collectif des heures travaillées, consommation publique et équilibre de

Lindahl. Revue Économique 58: 535-543.

Donni, O. (2008). Labor supply, home production and welfare comparisons. Journal of Public

Economics 92: 1720-1737.

Donni, O. (2008). Collective models of the household. In: Blume, L. and Durlauf, S. (ed.). The New

Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Londres: Palgrave McMillan.

Donni, O. (2009). A simple approach to investigate intrahousehold allocation of private and public

goods. The Review of Economics and Statistics 91 : 617-628.

Donni, O. (2014). Overinvestment in marriage-specific capital. Mathematical Social Sciences 67: 34-

43.

Donni, O., and Chiappori, P.A. (2011). Non-unitary models of household behavior: a survey of the

literature. In: Molina, J.A. (ed.). Household Economic Behaviors. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

Donni, O., and Matteazzi, E. (2012). On the importance of household production in collective

models: evidence from U.S. data. Annals of Economics and Statistics 105-106: 99-126.

Donni, O., and Matteazzi, E. (Forthcoming). Collective decisions, household production, and labor

force participation, Journal of Applied Econometrics.

Donni, O., and Moreau, N. (2007). Collective labor supply: a single-equation model and some

evidence from French data. The Journal of Human Resources 42 (1) : 214-246.

Donni, O., and Ponthieux, S. (2011). Approches collectives du ménage : du modèle unitaire aux

décisions collectives. Travail, Genre et Sociétés 26: 1-18.

Doss, C. (1996). Testing among models of intrahousehold resource allocation. World Development

24: 1597-1609.

Doss, C. (2013). Intrahousehold bargaining and resource allocation in developing countries. World

Bank Research Observer 28: 52-78.

Duflo, E. (2003). Grandmothers and granddaughters: old age pension and intra-household

allocation in South Africa. World Bank Economic Review 17: 1-25.

Dunbar, G., Lewbel, A., and Pendakur, K. (2013). Children’s resources in collective households:

identification, estimation and an application to child poverty in Malawi. American

Economic Review 103: 438-471.

Dunbar, G., Lewbel, A., and Pendakur, K. (2017). Identification of random resource shares in

collective households without preference similarity restrictions. Mimeo. Boston College.

Eckstein, Z., and Lifshitz, O. (2015). Household interaction and the labor supply of married

women. International Economic Review, 56: 427-455.

46

Ermisch, J., and Pronzato, C. (2008). Intra-household allocation of resources: inferences from non-

resident fathers’ child support payments. The Economic Journal 118: 347-362.

Fafchamps, M. (1998). Efficiency in intrahousehold resource allocation. FCND discussion papers

55, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

Fafchamps, M. (2008). Intrahousehold welfare. In: Blume, L., and Durlauf, S. (ed.). The New

Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Londres: Palgrave McMillan.

Fernández-Val, I. (2003). Household labor supply: evidence for Spain. Investigaciones Económicas

27: 239-275.

Flinn, C., Todd, P., and Zhang, W. (2018). Personality traits, intra-household allocation and the

gender wage gap. European Economic Review 109:191-220.

Folbre, N. (1997). Gender coalitions: extrafamily influences on intrafamily inequality. In: Haddad,

L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds). Intrahousehold resource allocation in


Press.

Fong, Y., and Zhang, J. (2001). The identification of unobservable independent and spousal leisure.

Journal of Political Economy 109: 191-202.

Fortin, B., and Lacroix, G. (1977). A test of the unitary and collective models of household labour

supply. The Economic Journal 107: 933-955.

Fujii, T., and Ishikawa, R. (2013). A note on separability and intra-household resource allocation in

a collective household model. Review of Economics of the Household 11: 143.

Fujii, T., and Ishikawa, R. (2013). How does childbirth alter intrahousehold resource allocation?

Evidence from Japan. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 75: 362-387.

Fuwa, N. , Ito, S. , Kubo, K. , Kurosaki, T., and Sawada, Y. (2006). Introduction to a study of

intrahousehold allocation and gender discrimination in rural Andhra Pradesh India. The

Developing Economies, 44: 375-397.

Galichon, A., and Salanié, B. (2015). Cupid’s Invisible Hand: Social Surplus and Identification in

Matching Models. Mimeo. Columbia University.

Galichon, A., Kominers, S., and Weber, S. (Forthcoming). Costly Concessions: An Empirical

Framework for Matching with Imperfectly Transferable Utility. Journal of Political

Economy.

Gersbach, H., and Haller H. (1999). Allocation among multi-member households: issues, cores and

equilibria. In: Alkan, A., Aliprantis, C.D., and Yannelis, N.C. (eds). Current Trends in

Economics. Studies in Economic Theory, vol 8. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Gersbach, H., and Haller, H. (2001). Collective decisions and competitive markets. Review of


47

Gersbach, H., and Haller, H. (2011). Groups, collective decisions and markets. Journal of

Economic Theory 146: 275–299

Gittelsohn, J., and Mookherji, S. (1997). The application of anthropological methods to the study of

intrahousehold resource allocation. In: Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds).

Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Methods, models, and policy.

Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Goussé, M., Jacquemet, N., and Robin, J.M. (2017). Marriage, labor supply, and home production.

Econometrica 85: 1873-1919.

Goussé, M., Jacquemet, N., and Robin, J.M. (2017). Household labor supply and the marriage

market in the UK, 1991-2008, Labour Economics 46, 131-149

Gray, J.S. (1998). Divorce-law changes, household bargaining, and married women’s labor Supply.

American Economic Review 88: 628-642.

Gutierrez, F. (2016). A sharing model of the household: Explaining the Deaton-Paxson paradox

and contesting the collective model. Mimeo. Vanderbilt University.

Gutierrez, F., and Moro, A. (2017). Household bargaining power, preferences for children and

household consumption. Mimeo. Vanderbilt University.

Guyer, J.I. (1997). The anthropology of wealth and the economics of intrahousehold allocation. In:



Press.

Haan, P., and Myck, M. (2012). Multi-family households in a labour supply model: a calibration

method with application to Poland. Applied Economics 44: 2907-2919

Haddad, G.K. (2015). Gender ratio, divorce rate, and intra-household collective decision proves:

evidence from Iranian urban households labor supply with non-participation. Empirical

Economics 48: 1365-1394.

Haddad, L., and Hoddinott, J. (1994). Women’s income and boy-girl anthropometric status in the

Côte d’Ivore. World Development 22: 543-553.

Haddad, L., and Kanbur, R. (1990). How serious is the neglect of intra-household inequality. The

Economic Journal 100: 866-881.

Haddad, L., and Kanbur, R. (1992). Intrahousehold inequality and the theory of targeting.

European Economic Review 36: 372-378.

Haddad, L., and Kanbur, R. (1993). The value of intrahousehold survey data for age-based

nutritional targeting. Annales d'Économie et de Statistique 29: 65–81.

Haddad, L., Kanbur, R., and Bouis, H. (1995). Intrahousehold inequality at different welfare levels:

energy intake and energy expenditure data from the Philippines. Oxford Bulletin of

Economics and Statistics 57 (3): 389–409.

48

Hallberg, D. (2000). Does time-use data support the unitary model? A test using Swedish Time-use

data from 1984 and 1993. Working Paper Series 2000:14, Uppsala University, Department

of Economics.

Hallberg, D. (2002). Essays on household behavior and time-use. Ph.D. thesis. Uppsala University.

Harris-White, B. (1997). Gender bias in intrahousehold nutrition in South Africa: unpacking

households and the policy process. In: Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds).

Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Methods, models, and policy.

Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Hendy, R., and Sofer, C. (2010). A collective model of female labor supply: Do distribution factors

matter in the Egyptian case? WP No. 2010.35. Centre d’Économie de la Sorbonne.

Himmelweit, S., Santos, C., Sevilla, A., and Sofer, C. (2013). Sharing of resources within the family

and the economics of household decision making. Journal of Marriage and Family 75: 625-

639.

Hoddinott, J., Alderman, H. and Haddad, L. (1997). Testing competing models of intrahousehold

allocation. In: Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds). Intrahousehold resource

allocation in developing countries: Methods, models, and policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins

University Press.

Hoddinott, J. and Haddad, L. (1995). Does female income share influence household expenditures?

Evidence from Côte d'Ivoire. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 57: 77-96

Hourriez, J.M. (2005). Estimation of a collective model of labor supply with female

nonparticipation. Mimeo. INSEE.

Inoa, I., Picard, N., and de Palma, A. (2014). Intra-household decision models of residential and job

location. THEMA Working Papers 2014-05. Université de Cergy-Pontoise.

Iyigun, M. (2005). Bargaining and specialization in marriage. IZA DP No. 1744. IZA Institute of

Labor Economics.

Iyigun, M., and Walsh, R.P. (2007). Endogenous gender power, household labor supply, and the

quantity-quality tradeoff. Journal of Development Economics 82:1, 138-155.

Iyigun, M., and Walsh, R.P. (2007). Building the family nest: pre-marital investments, marriage

markets and spousal allocations. Review of Economic Studies 74 (2): 507-35.

Jerison, M. (1994). Optimal income distribution rules and representative consumers, The Review of

Economic Studies 61, 739–771.

Jia, Z. (2005). Labor supply of retiring couples and heterogeneity in household decision-making

structure, Review of Economics of the Household 3: 215.

Kanbur, R., and Haddad, L. (1994). Are better off households more unequal or less unequal?

Oxford Economic Papers 46: 445-458.

49

Kalugina, E., Radtchenko, N. and Sofer, C. (2008). Une analyse du partage intrafamilial du revenu

à partir de données subjectives, Economie & Prévision 186: 101-116.

Kalugina, E., Radtchenko, N., and Sofer, C. (2009) How do spouses share their full income?

Identification of the sharing rule using self-reported income. Review of Income and

Wealth 55: 360-391.

Kalugina, E., Radtchenko, N. and Sofer, C. (2009) Intra-household inequality in transitional Russia.

Review of Economics of the Household 7:447-471.

Kato, H., and Matsumoto, M. (2009). Intra-household interaction in a nuclear family: A utility-

maximizing approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 43: 191-203.

Katz, E. (1997). The intra-household economics of voice and exit. Feminist Economics 3: 25-46

Kawaguchi, A. (1994). Testing neoclassical and non-neoclassical models of household labour

supply. Applied Economics, 26: 9-19

Kebede, B., Tarazona, M., Munro, A., and Verschoor, A. (2014). Intra-household efficiency: An

experimental study from Ethiopia. Journal of African Economies 23: 105–150.

Klassen, S. (1998). Marriage, bargaining, and intrahousehold resource alocation: Excess female

mortality among adults during early German development, 1740-1860. Journal of

Economic History 58 : 432-467.

Konrad, K.A., and Lommerud, K.E. (1995). Family policy with non-cooperative families.

Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97 : 581-601.

Konrad, K.A., and Lommerud, K.E. (2000). The bargaining family revisited. Canadian Journal of


Koolwal, G., and Ray, R. (2002). Estimating the endogenously determined intrahousehold balance

of power and its impact on expenditure pattern: Evidence from Nepal. World Bank Policy

Research Working Paper No. 2814. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

Kooreman, P. (1994). Estimation of econometric models of some discrete games. Journal of Applied

Econometrics, 9 : 255-268.

Kooreman, P., and Kapteyn, A. (1990). On the empirical implementation of some game theoretic

models of household labor supply. Journal of Human Resources, 25 : 584-598.

Lacroix, G., and Radtchenko, N. (2011). The changing intra-household resource allocation in

Russia. Journal of Population Economics 24: 85-106.

Lakshmanasamy, T. (2003). Testing the unitary and Nash bargaining household models in India.

Journal of Social and Economic Development 5: 197-217

Lancaster, G., Maitra, P., and Ray, R. (2006). Endogenous intra-household balance of power and its

impact on expenditure patterns: Evidence from India. Economica 73: 435-460.

50

Lechene, V., and Preston, I. (2011). Non cooperative household demand. Journal of Economic

Theory 146: 504–527.

Lee, J. (2007). Marriage, the sharing rule, and pocket money: The case of South Korea, Economic

Development and Cultural Change 55: 557-581.

Lewbel, A. (2003). Calculating compensation in cases of wrongful death. Journal of Econometrics

113: 115-128.

Lewbel A. (2004). Equivalence scales based on collective household models. In: Dagum C., and

Ferrari, G. (eds). Household Behaviour, Equivalence Scales, Welfare and Poverty.

Contributions to Statistics. Heidelberg: Physica.

Lewbel, A., and Penkakur, K. (2008). Estimating collective household models with Engel curves.

Journal of Econometrics 147: 350-358.

Lich-Tyler, S. (2003). Negotiations and love songs: the dynamic of bargained household decisions.

Mimeo. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 2003 American Economic

Association Meeting.

Ligon, E. (2002). Dynamic bargaining in households (with an application to Bangladesh). CUDARE

Working Papers 972. University of California at Berkeley.

Linciano, N., and Simmons, P. (2010). Estimation of alternative models of female labour supply

with fixed travel costs. Discussion Papers 10/10, University of York.

Lise, J., and Seitz, S. (2011). Consumption inequality and intra-household allocations. Review of


Lise, J., and Yamada, K. (2014). Household sharing and commitment: evidence from panel data on

individual expenditures and time use. IFS Working Paper W14/0. Institute of Fiscal

Studies.

Lloyd, P. J. (1992). Individual and collective rationality in the household. Australian Economic

Papers 31: 127-145.

Løken, K., Lundberg, S., and Lommerud, K.-J. (2013). Your Place or Mine? On the Location

Decisions of Married Couples. Demography 50: 285-310.

Lommerud, K.-E. (1989). Marital division of labor with risk of divorce: the role of ‘voice’

enforcement contracts. Journal of Labor Economics 7: 113–127.

Lundberg, S. (1999). Family bargaining and retirement behavior. In: Aaron, H., Behavioral

dimensions of retirement economics. Brookings Institution Press.

Lundberg, S. (2002). Limits to specialization: family policy and economic efficiency. Mimeo.

University of Washington.

Lundberg, S. (2005). The division of labor by new parents: Does child gender matter? IZA WP No

1787. IZA Institute of Labor Economics.

51

Lundberg, S. (2012). Personality and Marital Surplus. IZA Journal of Labor Economics 1:3.

Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal

of Political Economy 101: 988–1010. Reprinted in:

Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R.A. (1997). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage

market. In: Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Alderman, H. (eds). Intrahousehold resource

allocation in developing countries: Methods, models, and policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins

University Press.

Lundberg, S., and Pollak, R. (1994). Noncooperative bargaining models of marriage. American

Economic Review Papers & Proceedings 84: 132-137.

Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic

Perspectives 10: 139-158. Reprinted in:

Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R. (1997). Bargaining and Distribution in Marriage. In: Persson, I.

and Jonung, C. Economics of the Family and Family Policies: A Selection of Papers from

the 15th Arne Ryde Symposium. New York: Routledge.

Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R. (2003). Efficiency in marriage. Review of Economics of the Household

1: 153-167.

Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R. (2007). The American family and family economics. Journal of

Economic Perspectives 21: 3-26.

Lundberg, R., Pollak, R., and Stearns, J. (2016). Family inequality: Diverging patterns in marriage,

cohabitation, and childbearing. Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (2): 79-102.

Lundberg, S., Romich, J., and Tsang, K.P. (2009). Decision-making by Children, Review of


Lundberg, S., and Rose, E. (1999). The determinants of specialization within marriage. Mimeo.

University of Washington.

Lundberg, S., Startz, R., and Stillman, S. (2003). The retirement-consumption puzzle: A marital

bargaining approach. Journal of Public Economics 87: 1199-1218.

Lundberg, S., Pollak, R.A., and Wales, T.J. (1997). Do husbands and wives pool their resources?

Evidence from the United Kingdom child benefit. Journal of Human Resources 32: 463-

480.

Lundberg, S., and Ward-Batts, J. (2004). Saving for retirement: Household bargaining and

household net worth. Claremont McKenna College Robert Day School of Economics and

Finance Research Paper No. 2004-03.

Luo, G.Y. (2002). Collective-decision making and heterogeneity in tastes. Journal of Business and

Economics Statistics 20: 213-226.

52

Lyssiotou, P. (2017). The impact of targeting policy on spouses’ demand for public goods, labor

supplies and sharing rule. Empirical Economics 53: 853-878.

Maitra, P., and Ray, R. (2000). Intra-household resource allocation and their impact on expenditure

patterns: Comparative evidence from South Africa and Pakistan. Mimeo. Monash

University.

Maitra P., and Ray, R. (2003). On a new test of the collective household model: Evidence from

Australia. Mimeo. Monash University.

Maitra P., and Ray, R. (2004). Analysis of resource inflows and their impact on household

behaviour: Evidence from South Africa. In: Dagum C., Ferrari G. (eds) Household

Behaviour, Equivalence Scales, Welfare and Poverty. Contributions to Statistics.

Heidelberg: Physica.

Maitra P., and Ray, R. (2005). The impact of intra-household balance of power on expenditure

pattern: The Australian evidence. Australian Economic Paper 44: 15-29.

Maitra P., and Ray, R. (2005). An integrated test of the unitary household model: Evidence from

Pakistan. ABERU Discussion Paper 7, 2005.

Mangiavacchi, L., and Rapallini, C. (2014). Self-reported economic condition and home production:

Intra-household allocation in Italy. Bulletin of Economic Research 66: 279-304.

Manzini, P. and Mariotti, M. (2018). Dual random utility maximisation, Journal of Economic

Theory 177: 162-182.

Martínez, C. (2013). Intrahousehold allocation and bargaining Power: Evidence from Chile,

Economic Development and Cultural Change 61: 577-605.

Matteazzi, E., Menon, M., and Perali, F. (2017). The collective farm household model: Policy and

welfare simulations. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 39: 111–153.

Mazzocco, M. (2004). Saving, risk sharing, and preferences for risk. The American Economic

Review 94: 1169-1182.

Mazzocco, M. (2006). Parents' preferences for expenditure on children when at least one parent

works and preferences are non-separable. CCPR Population Working Papers 2006.

University of California at Los Angeles.

Mazzocco, M. (2007). Household intertemporal behavior: a collective characterization and a test of

commitment. Review of Economic Studies 74: 857-895.

Mazzocco, M. (2008). Intertemporal behavior and household structure. Mimeo. University of

California at Los Angeles.

Mazzocco, M. (2008). Individual rather than household Euler equations: Identification and

estimation of individual preferences using household data. Mimeo. Duke University.

53

Mazzocco, M., and Saini, S. (2012). Testing efficient risk sharing with heterogeneous risk

preferences. American Economic Review 102: 428-468.

Mazzocco, M., Ruiz, C., and Yamaguchi, S. (2013). Labor supply, wealth dynamics, and marriage

decisions. Mimeo. University of California at Los Angeles.

Mazzocco, M., Ruiz, C., and Yamaguchi, S. (2014). Labor supply and household dynamics.

American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings 104: 354-59.

McElroy, M. B. (1990). The empirical content of nash-bargained household behavior. Journal of

Human Resources 25: 559–583.

McElroy, M. B. (1997). The policy implications of family bargaining and marriage markets. In:



Press.

McPeak, J.G., and Doss, C.R. (2006). Are household production decisions cooperative? Evidence on

pastoral migration and milk sales from Northern Kenya. American Journal of Agricultural

Economics 88: 525–541.

Menon, M., Pendakur K., and Perali, F. (2012). On the expenditure-dependence of children’s

resource shares. Economic Letters 117: 739-742.

Menon, M., Perali, F., and Piccoli, L. (2018). Collective consumption: an application to the passive

drinking effect. Review of Economics of the Household 16: 143.

Menon, M., Perali F., and Veronesi, M. (2014). Recovering individual preferences for non-market

goods: A collective travel-cost model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96:

438-457.

Michaud, P.C., and Vermeulen, F. (2004). A collective retirement model: identification and

estimation in the presence of externalities. Labour Economics 18 : 159-167.

Mizushima, A., and Futagami, K. (2015). Non-cooperative versus cooperative family. Journal of


Moehling, C. (2004). She has suddenly become powerful: Youth employment and household

decision-making in the early twentieth century. The Journal of Economic History 65: 414-

438.

Molina, J.A., Giménez-Nadal, J.I., Velilla, J. (2018). Intertemporal Labor Supply : A Household

Collective Approach. IZA Discussion Papers 11276, Institute of Labor Economics.

Molina, J.A., Giménez-Nadal, J.I., Velilla, J. (2018). Intra-household Wealth and Welfare Inequality

in the US : Estimations from a Collective Model of Labor Supply. IZA Discussion Papers

11707, Institute of Labor Economics.

54

Molina, J.A.,Ferrer, A. Giménez-Nadal, J.I., García-Lázaro, C., Moreno, Y. Sánchez, A.

(Forthcoming). Intergenerational cooperation within the household : a public good game

with three generations. Review of Economics of the Household.

Moreau N. (2000). Une application d'un modèle collectif d'offre de travail sur données françaises.

Économie & Prévision 146: 61-71.

Moreau, N., and Donni, O. (2002). Estimation d’un modèle collectif d’offre de travail avec taxation.

Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 65: 55-83.

Myck, M., Bargain, O., Beblo, M., Beninger, D., Blundell, R., Carrasco, R., Chiuri, M.C., Laisney, F.,

Lechene, V., Longobardi, E., Moreau, N., Ruiz-Castillo, J., and Vermeulen, F. (2006). The

working families’ tax credit and some European tax reforms in a collective setting. Review

of Economics of the Household 4: 129-158.

Naidoo, J. (2015). The power of tests for Pareto efficiency within the family. Mimeo. University of

Chicago.

Ortigueira, S., and Siassi, N. (2013). How important is intra-household risk sharing for savings and

labor supply? Journal of Monetary Economics 60: 650-666.

Ott, N. (1992). Intrafamily bargaining and household decisions. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

de Palma, A., Lindsey, R., and Picard, N. (2015). Trip-timing decisions and congestion with

household scheduling preferences. Economics of Transportation 4: 118-131.

de Palma, A., Picard, N., and Inoa, I. (2014). Discrete choice decision-making with multiple

decision-makers within the household. In: Hess, S., and Daly, A. (eds). Handbook of

Choice Modelling. Edward Elgar Publishing.

de Palma, A., Picard, N., and Ziegelmeyer, A. (2011). Individual and couple decision behavior

under risk: evidence on the dynamics of power balance. Theory and Decision 70: 45-64.

Pavoni, N. (2000). Inefficiencies in dynamic family decisions: an incomplete contracts approach to

labor supply. ChilD Working Papers (6/2000). Center for Household, Income, Labour and

Demographic Economics (ChilD)

Peluso, E., and Trannoy A. (2004). Welfare comparisons among individuals under Samuelson’s

model of households. In: Dagum C., Ferrari G. (eds). Household Behaviour, Equivalence

Scales, Welfare and Poverty. Contributions to Statistics. Physica, Heidelberg

Phipps, S.A., and Burton, P. (1995). Sharing within families: Implications for the measurement of

poverty among individuals in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue

Canadienne d'Economique 28: 177-204.

Phipps, S.A., and Burton, P. (1995). Social/institutional variables and behavior within households:

an empirical test using the Luxembourg income study. Feminist Economics 1: 151-174.

Phipps, S.A., and Burton, P. (1996). Collective models of family behaviour: implications for

economic policy. Canadian Public Policy 22: 129-143.

55

Phipps, S.A., and Burton, P. (1998). What’s mine is yours? The influence of male and female

incomes on patterns of household expenditure. Economica 65: 599-613.

Picard, N., de Palma, A., and Dantan S. (2013). Intra-household discrete choice models of mode

choice and residential location. International Journal of Transport Economics 40: 419-446.

Porter, M. (2017). Spousal bargaining over care for elderly parents in China. Imbalances in sex

rations influence the allocation of support. The Journal of Development Studies 53: 514-

529.

Prabhu, V.S. (2010). Tests of intrahousehold resource allocation using a CV framework: A

comparison of husbands’ and wives’ separate and joint WTP in the slums of Navi-

Mumbai, India. World Development 38: 606-619,

Quisumbing. A.R., and Maluccio, J.A. (2003). Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation:

evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of

Economics and Statistics 65: 283-327.

Radtchenko, N. (2016). Welfare sharing within the households: identification from subjective well-

being data and the collective model of labor supply. Journal of Family and Economic

Issues 37: 254-271.

Rainer, H. (2007). Should we write prenuptial contracts? European Economic Review 51: 337–363.

Rapallini, C. (2004). Scelte di consumo e modello colletivo : test della razionalità colletiva e stima

della regola di ripartizione con i dati italiani. Rivista di Politica Economica 9-10 : 249-271.

Rapoport, B., Sofer, C., and Solaz, A. (2006). La production domestique dans les modèles collectifs.

Actualité Économique : Revue d’Analyse Économique 82 : 247-270.

Rapoport, B., Sofer, C., and Solaz, A. (2011). Household production in a collective model: some

new results. Journal of Population Economics 24: 23-45.

Rasul, I. (2008). Household bargaining over fertility: Theory and evidence from Malaysia. Journal

of Development Economics 86: 215-241.

Ray, R., and Basu K. (2002). The collective model of the household and an unexpected implication

for child labor: Hypothesis and an empirical test. Policy Research Working Papers 2813.

World Bank.

Rodriguez L. (2016). Intrahousehold inequalities in child rights and well-being. A barrier to

progress? World Development 83: 111-134.

Rubalcava, L., and Thomas, D. (2000). Family bargaining and welfare. Labor and Population

Program Working Paper Series 00-10. RAND.

Rubalcava, L., Teruel G., and Thomas, D. (2002). Welfare design, women's empowerment and

income pooling. Documento de Trabajo 244. CIDE (Centro de investigatión y docencia

económicas).

56

Sahn, D.E., and Younger, S.D. (2009). Measuring intrahousehold health inequality: explorations

using the body mass index. Health Economics 18: S13-S36.

Schultz, T.P. (1990). Testing the neoclassical model of family labor supply and fertility. Journal of

Human Resources 25 : 599-631.

Seaton, J. (1997). Neoclassical and collective rationality in household labour supply. Applied


Seaton, J. (2001). Bargaining versus non-cooperation; transaction costs within marriage. Applied


Seitz, S. (2009). Accounting for racial differences in marriage and employment. Journal of Labor


Silvennoinen, H. (2008). Essays on household time allocation decisions in a collective household

model. PhD Thesis. Helsinki School of Economics.

Sinha, K. (2012). Endogenous, intra-household decision-making and its impact on the labour

supply of couples in rural India. Asian Economic Review 26: 137–157.

Siow, A. (2008). How does the marriage market clear? An empirical framework. Canadian Journal

of Economics/Revue Canadienne d'Économique 41: 1121-1155.

Smeulders, B., Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Spieksma, F., and Talla Nobibon, F. (2015). Complexity

results for the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference for collective consumption models.

Journal of Mathematical Economics 58: 82-91

Smeulders, B., Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., and Spieksma, F. (2015). Transitive preferences in multi-

member households. Economic Theory Bulletin 3: 243-254.

Strand, J. (2005). Individual and household values of mortality reductions with intrahousehold

bargaining. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 31: 217.

Snyder, S.K. (1999). Testable restrictions of Pareto optimal public good provision. Journal of Public


Snyder, S.K. (2000). Nonparametric testable restrictions of household behavior. Southern Economic

Journal 67: 171-185.

Sofer, C., and Thibout, C. (2015). La division du travail selon le genre est-elle efficiente? Une

analyse à partir de deux enquêtes Emploi du temps. Economie et Statistique 478-479-480 :

273-304.

Sprumont, Y. (2000). On the testable implications of collective choice theories. Journal of Economic

Theory 93: 205-232.

Stieglitz, J., Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., and Hopfensitz, A. (2017). Why household inefficiency? An

experimental approach to assess spousal resource distribution preferences in a

57

subsistence population undergoing socioeconomic change. Evolution and Human

Behavior 38: 71-81.

Strauss, J., Mwabu, G., and Geegle, K. (2000). Intrahousehold allocations: a review of theories and

empirical evidence. Journal of African Economies 9: 83-143.

Strauss, J., and Thomas, D. (1995). Human resources: Empirical modeling of household and family

decisions. In: Chenery, H., and T.N. Srinivasan, T.N. (eds). Handbook of Development

Economics 3 A: 1883-2023. Elsevier.

Talla Nobibon, F., Cherchye, L., Crama, F., Demuynck T., De Rock, B., and Spieksma, F. (2016).

Revealed preference tests of collectively rational consumption behavior: formulations and

algorithms. Operations Research 64: 1197–1216.

Talla Nobibon, F., Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Sabbe, J., and Spieksma, F. (2011). Heuristics for

deciding collectively rational consumption behavior. Computational Economics 38: 173-

204.

Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-household Resource Allocation: An inferential approach. Journal of

Human Resources 25 : 635-664.

Thomas, D. (1993). The distribution of income and expenditures within the household. Annals

d’Économie et de Statistique, 29 : 109-135.

Thomas, D. (1994). Like Father, Like Son: Like mother, like daughter: Parental resources and child

height. Journal of Human Resources 25 : 950-988.

Thomas, D., and Chen, C. L. (1994). Income shares and shares of income: empirical tests of models

of household resource allocations. Labor and Population Program Working Paper Series

No 94–08. RAND.

Thomas, D., Contreras, D., and Frankenberg, E. (2002). Distribution of power within the household

and child health. Mimeo. University of California at Los Angeles.

Tiefenthaler, J. (1999). The sectoral labor supply of married couples in Brazil: testing the unitary

model of household behavior. Journal of Population Economics 12: 591-606.

Tommasi, D., and Wolf, A. (2018). Overcoming weak identification in the estimation of household

resource shares. Working Papers ECARES 2016-12. Université Libre de Bruxelles

Tommasi, D., and Wolf, A. (2018). Estimating household resource shares: A shrinkage approach,


Trannoy, A., and Peluso, E. (2007). Does less inequality among households mean less inequality

among individuals? Journal of Economic Theory 133: 568-578.

Trannoy, A., and Peluso, E. (2009). Poverty orderings and intra-household inequality: The Lost

Axiom. Journal of Income Distribution 18: 24-33.

58

Udry, C. (1996). Gender, agricultural production, and the theory of the household. Journal of


Van Klaveren, C., van Praag, B., and van den Brink, H.M. (2008). A public good version of the

collective household model: an empirical approach with an application to British

household data. Review of Economics of the Household 6: 169-191.

Van Klaveren, C., and Ghysels, J. (2012). Collective labor supply and child care expenditures:

Theory and application. Journal Labor Research 33: 196.

Vermeulen, F. (2002). Collective household models: principles and main results. Journal of

Economic Surveys 16: 533-564.

Vermeulen, F. (2005). And the winner is… An empirical evaluation of unitary and collective labour

supply models. Empirical Economics 30: 711-734.

Vermeulen, F. (2006). A collective model for female labour supply with non-participation and

taxation. Journal of Population Economics 19: 99-118.

Vermeulen, F., Bargain, O., Beblo, M., Beninger, D., Blundell, R., Carrasco, R., Chiuri, M.C.,

Laisney, F., Lechene, V., Moreau, N., Myck, M., and Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2006). Collective

models of labor supply with nonconvex budget sets and non-participation: a calibration

approach. Review of Economics of the Household 4: 113-127.

Vermeulen F., and Watteyne, A. (2006). Quand un et un ne font plus deux : calcul d’échelles

d’équivalence intrafamiliales au moyen d’un modèle collectif. Actualité Économique :

Revue d’Analyse Économique 82: 53-86.

Voena, A. (2015). Yours, mine and ours: do divorce laws affect the intertemporal behavior of

married couples? American Economic Review 105: 2295-2332.

Ward-Batts, J. (2008). Out of the wallet and into the purse. Using micro data to test income pooling.

The Journal of Human Resources 43: 325-351.

Wells, R., and Maher, M. (1996). Time and surplus allocation within marriage. Research Paper No.

1372. Graduate School of Business. Stanford.

Wirl, F., and Feichtinger, G. (2002). Intrafamiliar consumption and saving under altruism and

wealth considerations. Economica, 69: 93-111.

Woolley, F.R. (1990) Economic models of family decision-making, with applications to

intergenerational justice. PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science

(United Kingdom).

Xu Z. (2007). Survey of intra-household models and evidence. Mimeo. American Institutes for

Research.

Yilmazer, T., and Lich, S. (2015). Portfolio choice and risk attitudes: a household bargaining

approach. Review of Economics of the Household 13: 219-241.

59

Yoon, S., and Goulias, K. (2010). The Impact of time-space prism accessibility on time use behavior

and its propagation through intra-household interaction- Transportation Letters 2, 245-

260.

Yoshida, A., and Kim, Y.-S. (2008). Sharing health risk and income risk within households:

evidence from Japanese data. Applied Economics 40: 1723-1735

Zamora, B. (2011). Does female participation affect the sharing rule? Journal of Population


Zhang, J., Kuwano, M., Lee, B., and Fujiwara, A. (2009). Modeling household discrete choice

behavior incorporating heterogeneous group decision-making mechanisms,

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 43: 230-250.

Zhang, S. (2014). Wage shocks, household labor supply, and income instability. Journal of

Population Economics 27: 767-796.

Documents

DICION PAPER ERIEftp.iza.org/dp11915.pdf · 2018. 11. 15. · ATACT ZA DP o. 11915 CTBE 2018 Household Collective Models: Three Decades of Theoretical Contributions and Empirical