Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Australian Journal of Adult Learning Volume 52, Number 1, April 2012
Diabetes literacy: health and adult literacy practitioners in partnership
Stephen BlackUniversity of Technology, Sydney
This paper describes pedagogy in a series of ‘diabetes literacy’ programs involving culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities. The programs were jointly delivered in local community sites, including neighbourhood centres and public housing halls, by qualified nutritionists from a public health service and adult literacy teachers from a technical and further education (TAFE) institute. The programs were funded by the Australian Government as an adult literacy innovative project, and they were considered innovative because the concept of ‘diabetes literacy’ is relatively new, and in the Australian health literacy context, the work of health professionals in a team with adult literacy teachers and other organisational partners is undeveloped and rarely documented. The main focus of the paper is on how these two partners managed to work together effectively within an integrated literacy approach focusing on the situated health needs of selected CALD communities.
90 Stephen Black
Introduction
ThispaperreportsonaprojectfundedbytheDepartmentofEducation,EmploymentandWorkplaceRelations(DEEWR)underits2007AdultLiteracyNationalProject.Itwasaninnovativeprojectinthesensethatitfocusedon‘diabetesliteracy’,aconceptnotyetwidelyknown,anditinvolvedorganisationalpartnershipsbetweenavocationaleducationandtraining(VET)institution,apublichealthorganisation,adiabeteseducationorganisationandlocalcommunitygroups(seeBlack,Innes&Chopra2008).Atlocallevelssimilarpartnershipsmayhaveoperated‘undertheradar’,butrarelyhavetheybeendocumentedinAustralia.Acentralfeatureoftheprojectinvolvedadultliteracyteachersco-presentingwithqualifiednutritionists(alsodietitians)toprovidediabeteseducationtolocalcommunitygroups.Underpinningthedeliveryoftheprogramswasapedagogywhichviewedparticipantsasmembersofsocialnetworks(Balatti&Black2011),andfocusedontheirsituatedhealthneeds.Thispapermakesthecaseforthefurtherdevelopmentofsimilarpartnershipsandpedagogicalapproachesinhealthliteracyprojects.
Theprojectinvolvedthetriallingofsixshortdiabetesliteracyprograms(twohoursperweekforsevenweeks)whichfocusedoneducatingculturallyandlinguisticallydiverse(CALD)groupsabouttherisksandpreventionoftype2diabetes.Theseprogramscanbeseenasalocalresponsetowhathasbeentermedanationaldiabetes‘epidemic’(DiabetesAustraliaNSW2007),orinthewordsofsomeresearchers,adiabetes‘juggernaut’(Zimmet&James2006).Theprogramswereconductedoverthecourseofoneyear(fromOctober2007toSeptember2008)andeachprogramtargeteddifferentCALDgroupsintheirlocalcommunitiesontheoutskirtsofamajorAustraliancity.ThetargetgroupsincludedCALDgroupsknowntoexperienceahigherrateoftype2diabetes,includingpeopleborninChina,Armenia,IranandAfghanistan.Eachprogramwasjointlydeliveredbyanadultliteracyteacherandaqualifiednutritionist,with
Diabetes literacy 91
thesupportinsomecases,ofalocalcommunitymemberwhoactedasaninterpreter.Adiabetessupportorganisation(DiabetesAustralia)providedsomeresourcesandprofessionaldevelopmentforadultliteracyteacherspriortotheprograms.Thefocusofeachprogramwasonthepreventionnotthemanagementoftype2diabetes,andeachprogramfocusedoneducatingaboutthetypesandnatureofdiabetes,andtheroleofdietandexerciseinhelpingtopreventtype2diabetes.
An integrated concept of literacy
Theprogramswerebasedonan‘integrated’conceptofadultliteracy(e.g.Courtenay&Mawer1995;McKenna&Fitzpatrick2005;Wickert&McGuirk2005;Black&Yasukawa2011).Thatis,theprimeconcernintheprogramswastheeffectivedeliveryandunderstandingofimportanthealthmessages,andliteracypracticeswerehighlightedandaddressed‘asinterrelatedelementsofthesameprocess’(Courtenay&Mawer1995:2).Thus,theywerenotprogramsdesignedtoimproveliteracyskillsassuch,exceptintheprocessoffacilitatinglearningaboutdiabetesprevention.Theadultliteracyteacher’srolewasmainlytominimiseEnglishlanguageandliteracybarrierstolearning,andtohelpprovidetheapproachtolearningthatbestenabledparticipantstolearnaboutdiabetes.Qualifiednutritionistsprovidedthediabetesknowledgeandexpertise.
Diabetes literacy—a new concept
Whilehealthliteracygenerallyisacontestedconcept(e.g.Peerson&Saunders2009),wedrewonadefinitionofhealthliteracybyZarcadoolas,PleasantandGreer(2005:196–197)todefinediabetesliteracyas:‘Theskillsandcompetencestocomprehend,evaluateanduseinformationtomakeinformedchoicesabouttherisks,preventionandmanagementofdiabetes’.Specifically,themajorconcernwastype2diabetes,andtolocatediabetesliteracyasanactiveformofcommunitydecision-makingforpromotinggoodhealth.Inthe
92 Stephen Black
internationalresearchliterature,therearerelativelyfewexamplesofspecificprogramsbeingconductedasameansofpreventingtype2diabetes,thoughprogramshavebeendevelopedtoassistcommunitygroupsinmanagingthedisease(e.g.Deitrick,Paxtonetal.2010),anddiabetesmanagementinformationisavailable(asa‘toolkit’)foradultswithlowliteracyandnumeracyskills(Wolff,Cananaghetal.2009).
Literature review
Thisprojectbringstogethertheadultliteracyandhealthsectorsina‘healthliteracy’initiative.InAustralia,comparedwithsomeotherwesterncountries(outlinedbelow),therearefewhealthliteracyinitiatives,andespeciallywhereliteracyandhealthprofessionalshaveworkedtogether.Todate,healthliteracyinAustraliahasbeenaconceptdevelopedandpromotedlargelyfromwithinthehealthsector(e.g.Nutbeam,Wiseetal.1993;Nutbeam1999;Green,LoBianco&Wyn2007;Keleher&Hagger2007;Peerson&Saunders2009)withverylimitedinputfromliteracyspecialists(foranexception,seeFreebody&Freiberg1999).
ThesituationinAustraliaisincontrasttohealthliteracyintheUnitedStates(e.g.Nielsen-Bohlman,Panzar&Kindig2004),Canada(e.g.Rootman&Gordon-El-Bihbety2008,Simich2009)andinEurope(Kickbusch,Wait&Maag2005),wheretheconceptandresultingprogramsareverywelldeveloped.Inthesecountriesandregionstherearealsoexamplesofstronglinksbetweentheadultliteracyandhealthsectors.IntheUnitedStates,thishasbeenevidentsincethe1990s(e.g.Sissel&Hohn1995;Hohn1998),andadecadeagotheselinkswerereferredtoas‘amaturingpartnership’(Rudd2002).IntheUK,the‘Skilledforhealth’initiativeshavedemonstratedsimilarlyeffectivepartnershipsbetweenhealthandadultliteracypractitioners(TheTavistockInstitute2009).
Diabetes literacy 93
InAustralia,thefirstnationalhealthliteracysurvey(AustralianBureauofStatistics2008)basedontheAdultLiteracyandLifeSkillssurvey(ALLS,seeAustralianBureauofStatistics2007)providedapotentialcatalystforthedevelopmentofhealthliteracyinitiatives,thoughtodatetherehasbeenlittleevidenceofanyaction.Defininghealthliteracyasessentiallytheabilitytoaccessandusehealthinformation,thesurveysoughttoquantifytheextentofhealthliteracyinAustralia,withclaims,forexample,thatthosewiththepooresthealthliteracylevelsweregenerallyolder,lackingformaleducation,unemployedortheirfirstlanguagewasnotEnglish.
Cross-sectoral partnerships
Inboththehealthandadultliteracysectors,thereiscurrentlyapushforpartnershipsaspartofatrendtowards‘linked-up’or‘whole-of-government’approachestoaddressingsocialpolicyproblemsandissues.Inhealthpromotionthepushforsuchpartnershipsandallianceshasbeengoingoninternationallyformorethanadecade(e.g.Gillies1998).Thisisduelargelytothehealthsector’sshiftbeyondclinicalandcurativemeasurestothegrowingrecognitionofthebroadersocial,economicandenvironmentaldeterminantsofhealth(e.g.Wilkinson&Marmot2003;Keleher&Murphy2004),andtheneedtocrosstheboundariesofdifferentpolicysectorsandthusbreakdownprevious‘silo’approachestohealth.
TheadultliteracysectorinAustraliabycontrastisrelativelynewtothepromotionofpartnershipsbut,inrecentyears,cross-sectoralpartnerships,communitycapacitybuildingandnotionsof‘integrated’and‘socialpractice’understandingsofliteracyhavebeenpromotedstronglyinsomenationalresearchreports(e.g.Wickert&McGuirk2005;Balatti,Black&Falk2009).ResearchbyFiggis(2004)andHartleyandHorne(2006),however,indicatethepaucityofpartnershipsinvolvingadultliteracyandthehealthsector.
94 Stephen Black
The role of social capital
Linkedstronglytothepushforpartnershipsandcommunitycapacitybuildingistheconceptofsocialcapitalwhichreferstosocialnetworksandrelationsbetweenpeoplewithingroupsasaresource(seeAustralianBureauofStatistics2004).Thereisincreasingrecognitionthatthesocio-economicwell-beingofindividuals,groupsandnationsisdependantnotjustontheacquisitionoftechnicalskills(humancapital),butalsothenetworks,trustandsharedvaluesthatcomprisesocialcapital(OECD2001).
Socialcapitalisincreasinglybeingseenasplayingaroleinbothhealthandadultliteracydiscourses.Forexample,ataverybasicstatisticallevel,theAustralianhealthliteracysurvey(AustralianBureauofStatistics2008)indicatesthatthosewhoparticipateingroupsandorganisations,evenasnon-paidvolunteers,achievehigherhealthliteracylevelsthanthosewhodonotparticipate.Whiletherearesomeresearcherswhoseetheroleofsocialcapitalinhealthasbothcomplexandcontested(e.g.Campbell2001;Szreter&Woolcock2004),neverthelessitisseentoofferausefulstartingpointandthespacetoexaminethedynamicsinvolvedinthesocialdeterminantsofhealth(e.g.Brough,Hendersonetal.2007),andworldwidethisisaburgeoningareaofresearch(e.g.Kawachi,Subramanian&Kim2008).
Intheadultliteracyfieldthereisresearchindicatingthesocialcapitaloutcomesfromadultliteracycoursesandhowparticularpedagogicalstrategiescanhelpproducetheseoutcomes,suchasfosteringbondingtiesbetweenparticipants,drawingontheirlifeexperiencesand,throughbridgingandlinkingties,encouragingconnectionswithoutsidenetworks(Balatti,Black&Falk2006,2009).Muchofthisworkdrawsonsocialtheoriesoflearninginwhichlearningisunderstoodtooccurbestwhenitissituatedin‘communitiesofpractice’(Lave&Wenger1991;Wenger1998).Learnersinthesecommunitiescreateandnegotiateknowledgeandmeaningin
Diabetes literacy 95
dialoguewithothercommunitymembers,andthusbecomeactiveparticipantsintheirownlearning.Thismodelhasbeenproposedrecentlyforhealthlearninginvolvingadultliteracyprograms(Schecter&Lynch2011),anditunderpinstheeffectivedeliveryofthetype2diabetespreventionprogramsdescribedinthispaper.
Type 2 diabetes and CALD groups
AccordingtorecentAustralianGovernmentreports,diabetesisoneoftheleadingchronicdiseasesaffectingAustralians,withanestimated787,500people(3.8%ofthepopulation)diagnosedwithtype2diabetesin2007–8(AustralianInstituteofHealthandWelfare2011:15).Further,therateoftype2diabetesinAustraliahasincreasedsteadily,triplingfrom1995to2007–8(AustralianBureauofStatistics2011).Themajorityofcasesoftype2diabetes(upto80%)areconsideredpreventableorcanbedelayedbyhealthydietandincreasedphysicalactivity(Colagiuri,Thomas&Buckley2007:2;DiabetesAustralia2007).IndigenouspeopleinAustraliaexperiencethehighestratesofdiabetes,threetimesthenon-Indigenouspopulation,anddiabetesisalsoassociatedwithsocio-economicdisadvantage,livinginremoteareasandbeingbornoverseas.Regardingthelattergroup,theprevalencerateishigherforpeopleborninregionssuchasNorthAfrica,theMiddleEastandSouth-EastAsia(AustralianInstituteofHealthandWelfare2008).
Itismainlypeoplebornoverseasinnon-EnglishspeakingcountrieswhocomprisetheCALDgroupsthatarethefocusofthispaper,andreportshaveexaminedthecomplexityoffactorsresponsiblefortheirhigherprevalencerates(e.g.AustralianInstituteofHealth&Welfare2003;AustralianCentreforDiabetesStrategies2005;Thow&Waters2005;Colagiuri,Thomas&Buckley2007).Includedinsocio-economicriskfactorsarelevelsofspokenandwrittenEnglish,andtheAustralianHealthLiteracySurvey(AustralianBureauofStatistics2008)indicatedthatpeoplewhosefirstlanguagewasnotEnglishperformedmainlyatthelowesttwohealthliteracylevelsonthefive-pointscaleofproficiency.
96 Stephen Black
Interventionstohelppreventtype2diabetesforCALDcommunitiesoftenfocusonchanginglifestylefactorssuchasdietandphysicalexercise,andsuccessfulinterventionsareseentobethosethatare consultative,involvingthetargetcommunity;collaborative,usingarangeofpartnerships;practical,inremovinglinguisticandsocio-culturalbarriers;andculturally appropriate,takingaccountofthecharacteristicsofthetargetgroups(Colagiuri,Thomas&Buckley2007).Establishingpartnershipswithethniccommunitiesinordertoencourageculturally-competenthealthpromotionisalsoseentobesignificant(NationalHealthandMedicalResearchCouncil2006).Alloftheseelementsresonatestronglywiththediabetesliteracyprogramsoutlinedinthispaper.
Methoology and research samples
Primarily,thisprojectadoptedaqualitativeresearchapproach.Theresearchcomprisedthreecomponents:firstly,anactionresearchcomponentinvolvingtheresearcher,theadultliteracyteachersandthehealthprofessionalsineachprogram;secondly,semi-structuredinterviewswiththeparticipantsattheconclusionofeachprogram;andthirdly,afollow-uptelephoneevaluationofparticipants’viewsundertakenatleastonemonthaftertheprogramfinished.Thispaperreportsmainlyonthefirstcomponent—theactionresearch.DetailsoftheotherresearchcomponentsareavailableinBlack,InnesandChopra(2008).
Thekeyaimofthestudy,andthemain‘new’elementtoberesearchedaspartoftheactionresearch,washowadultliteracyteachersandhealthprofessionalscouldworktogethereffectivelyasteamteachers.Forbothgroups,teamteachingwasnewinthedeliveryofdiabetesliteracyprograms,thoughsomeadultliteracyteachersdidhaveexperienceteamteachingwithdifferentvocationalteachersinaVETcontext.
Diabetes literacy 97
Actionresearchfocusesonthepracticalissuesofimmediateconcerntosocialgroupsorcommunities(Burns1999:24).Itisusuallyundertakeninnaturallyoccurringsettingsandusesmethodscommontoqualitativeresearch.Theparticipatorynatureofactionresearchanditsemphasisonchangeandreflectiveprofessionalpracticemadeitparticularlysuitablefortheinnovative,community-basedprogramsinthisstudy.Theactionresearchinthisstudymainlycomprisedjointplanningbetweentheadultliteracyteachersandhealthprofessionalspriortoeachsession,and‘reflections’attheconclusionofmostsessionsonhowthesessionsprogressedandhowtheycouldbeimprovedinfuture.Itfollowedtheestablishedformatofmostactionresearchstudies—thespirallingprocessofplanning,action,observationandreflection(e.g.Kemmis&McTaggart1988).Thereflectionsessionscomprisedtheresearcherwhoprovidedsomefocusquestions,togetherwiththetwoco-presentersoftheprogram,andthesesessionsweretaperecordedandlatertranscribedinfull.
Inlightoftheaimofthestudy—toinvestigatehowadultliteracyteachersandhealthprofessionalscouldworktogethereffectivelyasteamteachers—thetranscriptinterviewdatawereorganisedaccordingtoseveralthemes.Theseincluded:howan‘integrated’conceptofliteracywasimplemented;howtheadultliteracyandhealthprofessionalsdeterminedtheirrespectiverolesandprofessionalboundaries;theimportanceofplanningandcommunicationforsuccessfulprograms;andthemainelementsofacollaborativepedagogywhichincludedasocialcapitalapproachtopedagogy.Thesethemescomprisethemainheadingsofthefindingsanddiscussionsectioninthispaper.
Intotal,sixlocalcommunityprogramsweredelivered,featuringAsianandMiddleEasterncommunitygroupsidentifiedintheresearchliteratureasexperiencinghigherratesoftype2diabetes.Theprogramsweredeliveredinlocalcommunitysitesconsideredtobeinareasoflowsocio-economicstatus,andwhichfeaturedahigh
98 Stephen Black
concentrationofpublichousing.Thesitesincludedneighbourhood/communitycentres,achurchhall,apublichousinghalland,inoneprogram,aTAFEcollege.Onaverage,10participantscompletedeachprogram,andpredominantlyparticipantsintheprogramswerefemale(86%).Theagesofparticipantsvaried,butprimarilytheywereolder,averaging55years,thoughintwoprogramstheagesaveraged70and72yearsrespectively.Recruitmenttotheprogramswasmainlythroughwordofmouthviaexistinglocalcommunitynetworks,includingthroughlocalChinese,ArmenianandIranianorganisations.
Program structure
Thestructureoftheprogramswasinitiallydeterminedthroughdiscussionsbetweenthenutritionistsandtheadultliteracyteachers.Whilethereweresomeslightvariations,inthemainthesixprograms(oftwo-hoursessionsforsevenweeks)adoptedthefollowingstructure:
Weeks 1 & 2: Introduction,gettingtoknowparticipantneeds,introductiontowhatisdiabetes—thedifferencesbetweenthetypesofdiabetesandhowdiabetesaffectspeople.
Weeks 3 & 4: Afocusondiet—discussionsonfoodtypes,foodlabels,nutritionandthefoodanddietoftheparticipantsinthecourse.Insomeprogramsatriptoasupermarketwasundertaken.
Weeks 5 & 6: Afocusonexercise—pedometersweresuppliedtoeveryparticipant,andinsomeprogramsthereweregroupexerciseactivities(TaiChiforexample,andashortwalkingtourinthecommunity).
Week 7: Arelaxedfinalsessionwithgeneraldiscussions,recapsontheessentialmessages,detailsprovidedof
Diabetes literacy 99
diabetestreatmentreferralservicesinthearea,andacommunallunchprovidedbytheparticipants.
Findings and discussion
Implementing an ‘integrated’ concept of literacy
‘Integrated’literacyisawellknownconceptinvocationaleducationandtraining,butthereareoftenmisunderstandingsoverwhatitinvolvesandhowitshouldbeimplemented(Black&Yasukawa2011).Forseveralofthepresentersinthesediabetesliteracyprograms,itwasmainlythroughtrialanderrorthattheygainedabetterunderstandingofhowitmightworkeffectivelyinpractice.Aswehaveindicated,theseprogramswerenotdesignedtoimproveliteracyskillsassuch,exceptintheprocessoffacilitatinglearningaboutdiabetesprevention,butattimesthismessagebecamealittleconfusing.Ahealthprofessionalcommentedatonestage,‘well,Idon’twanttotakeoverbecausetheaimisalsoliteracy’,whichwasnotentirelycorrect.Inherparticularprogramtherewasgreaterpotentialforconfusionbecauseitinvolvedconvertinganexistingadultliteracyclasstoadiabetespreventionclassfortheperiodoftheprogram(sevenweeks).Whiletherationalefordoingthiswassound—workingwithanexistingmainlyChinesecommunitygroupattendinganoff-campusliteracyclassinalocalneighbourhoodcentre—itwasneverthelessfoundproblematictore-labeltheclassasa‘diabetesprevention’programandtothenexpectallparticipantsandpresenterstounderstandtheprimaryfocuswasnowhealthandnotliteracy.The‘integrated’concept,however,waslessofanissueintheotherdiabetesliteracyprograms,astheliteracyteacheronaprogramdeliveringtoaChinesegroupdemonstratedinexplainingwheresheconsideredliteracyshouldfitin:
WeusealotofEnglishandtheygetthekeywords,[but]fromanEnglishteacherpointofview,it’snotgivinggrammarandeverything,it’sjustthekeywords,likecarbohydrate,Glycemic
100 Stephen Black
Index…insulin,allthesekindofkeywords…orliketheGIsymbols,[so]theyknowwhattolookfor…
Determining roles
Itwastobeexpectedthattherewouldbesomedifficultiestoovercomewithtwoprofessionals,unknowntoeachotherpriortotheprogramandfromdifferentdisciplinarybackgroundsandsectorsofwork,teamteachingonaseven-weekprogram.
Astheprogramswereessentiallyaboutdiabeteseducation,inmostprogramsthenutritionistledtheprogrambyintroducingthediabetespreventionknowledge,andtheliteracyteacherprovidedasecondary,supportingrole,tryingtoensurethatparticipantsunderstoodandwereengagedwiththeissues.However,thiswasnotnecessarilythecasewithallprograms.Inoneoftheprograms,itwasclearthatthehealthandliteracypresentersconsideredtheyhadequalthoughdifferentroles,andtheyweresufficientlyconfidentandrelaxedenoughintheirrolesto‘justjumpupandinterchange’astheneedaroseinthesessions.Asthedietitian(D)explained,theyworkedtogetherinacooperative,equalfashion:
Yes,well,Ithinkweworkedverywelltogether,becauseoftenwewouldfindoneofuswasstandinguptalkingordoingsomethingonthewhiteboardandsuddenlytheclasswouldbetryingtosayawordandIwouldn’tknowhowtoinstructthemthroughthat,soIwoulddeflecttoL[theliteracyteacher],whowouldthentakeoverorjumpupanddoadiagram…andshewoulddothesamewhenshewasrevisingsomethingwiththemandacontentquestionwouldcomeup—eithershewouldansweritandlooktomeforconfirmation,orshewouldthrowitovertome...
Theliteracyteacherintheabovepartnershipstated:
D[dietitian]putsthecontent,andthenIdoactivities,say,withD’scontent,soshe’sliketheknowledge,andIkindofstructuretheclassanddotheactivitieslikeIwouldnormallyinaneverydayclassroom.
Diabetes literacy 101
Issuesinvolvingtherelativestatusofthetwoteamteachers,andwhetherornotonedominates,appeartobecentralissuesinteamteachingsituationsinvolvingdisciplinaryexpertsworkingwithadultliteracyandnumeracyteachers(Black&Yasukawa2011).Inanotherofthediabetesprograms,theadultliteracyteacherknewtheparticipantsverywell,havingtaughtthemliteracyskillsforpartoftheyear,andthisteacherwasalsoquiteknowledgeableaboutdiabetes.Inthesecircumstances,shetookamoredominantroleinthedeliveryoftheprogram,whichmadethehealthprofessionalfeeluneasy,especiallyassheconsideredsomeoftheinformationprovidedtoparticipantswastooprescriptive,andfromherhealthperspective,actuallyincorrect.Asshestated,‘it’shardwhensomeone’stryingtotalkaboutyourareaofexpertise’.
Professional boundaries
Theabovesituationofahealthprofessionalfeelinguneasyabouthowhealthknowledgewasbeingdeliveredbyanon-healthprofessionalshouldhardlybesurprising,andtherewereseveralothersituationsintheprogramswherebothoreitherpresenterswereseentomovebeyondtheirareasofprofessionalexpertise.Inonecase,adietitianfeltsufficientlystronglyaboutanissueofincorrectinformationbeingdeliveredthatsheinformedherco-presentingadultliteracyteacherbyemailpriortotheirnextsession.Similarly,someadultliteracyteachersexpressedtheviewthattheirco-presentinghealthprofessionalssometimesspoketoofastanddeliveredinformationinappropriately,forexample,coveringtoomanyconceptsinonego,orbeingtoodidactic(‘youcan’tjustsitthereandtalk’).Thesewererelativelyminorissues,easilyovercome,thoughtheyneverthelessdemonstratedthatpresenterswereawaretheyweremembersofdifferentprofessionalnetworks,andtherewasanaturalsensitivityontheirparttoreflectandprotecttheirownareasofexpertise.Inanidealsituation,itwaspreciselythecombination(i.e.‘integration’)ofthetwoareasofprofessionalexpertisethatofferedthepossibility
102 Stephen Black
ofanenrichedlearningexperienceforparticipants.Thefollowingthree-waydialogueinvolvingtheresearcher(R),adietitian(D)andherco-presentingliteracyteacher(L)canbeviewedasanexampleofprofessionalsrepresentingtheirrespectiveareasofexpertiseinanintegratedway:
(R)Well,that’stheotherthing,whentheydogoandconsultadoctor…theyknowthequestionstoask,theyalreadyhaveagrounding[astheresultofthiscourse]
(D)That’swhatI’dliketo,Imean,(my)personalrolethatIhaveisthattheywillleavethiswithanincreasedawarenessoftheissuesarounddiabetes,eating,exercise,careofthefeet,andwheretogoformorehelp,andtobeabitmoreempoweredinaskingtheirdoctor
(L)Andtheyknowwhatthesewordsmean,theyknowconcepts,whatinsulinisandwhatitdoes
(D)Takemorecontrolovertheirownhealth
(L)Andthey’vealreadygotthatschemabeforetheygointhere…theyknowthewords.
Therewasalsoinevitablyacarry-overofskillsandknowledgefromoneprofessionalareatoanother.Literacyteachersgainedknowledgeaboutdiabetesandhowtopreventtype2diabetes,andhealthprofessionalsdevelopedpedagogicalstrategiesappropriateforworkingwithCALDparticipants.
Planning and communicating
Akeyelementtoeffectiveteamteachingintheseprogramswastheplanningandthecommunicationbetweentheco-presentersthatwentonbeforetheprogramstartedandbetweensessionsduringtheprogram.Inmostprogramsthetwopresenterscommunicatedviaemailpriortothesessions,andthisenabledagoodworkingrelationship.Onedietitiancommented:
Diabetes literacy 103
Ourresourcescomplementedeachother.IhadthesepictorialresourcesIgotfromDiabetesAustraliaonrisk,andtheyfittedperfectlywiththeworksheets.Well,Iguessthat’sbecausewehadcommunicatedaboutwhatwewanted.
However,inoneoftheprogramswheretheco-presentersdidnotcommunicateveryeffectivelyfromthebeginning,thereweresomeinitialproblems,astheliteracyteacherexplained:
Iwasabitsurprisedbecausewhensheturnedup,shesaidsortof,‘now,doyouwanttogetstartednow?’…AndIwassurprisedbecauseIpresumedthatshewasgoingtobeleadingitandgivingtheinformation.SoIactuallydidn’tquiteknowwhere…[tobegin].
Inthisprogramthesituationwasquicklyresolvedbeforethefollowingsessionandhenceforththerewasregularcommunicationbetweenbothpresentersbyphoneandemail,promptingtheliteracyteachertolaterstate,‘Itfeltmorecomfortableandshesaidthattoo…Ifeellikewe’vegotbitmoreofagame-plan’.
A collaborative pedagogy
Alltheprogramswereconductedinaninformal,relaxed,interactivemanner,encouragedbythelocalcommunitycontexts.Everyprogramexceptone(conductedinaTAFEcollege)involvedparticipantsseatedaroundonecentraltable.Teachingfacilitiesweresometimessparsewithamobilewhiteboardbeingtransportedtotwocentres,butthatwasasecondaryconcern.InoneprogramtargetingChineseresidentsinaneighbourhoodcentre,otherChinesepeoplewereinthesamecentreplayingmahjong,tabletennisanddoingChinesebrushpainting.Asanindicationofinformalityandthecommunityfeeloftheseprograms,theliteracyteachercommentedthatatmorningteatimeherstudents,‘…haveachatwiththepeopleinthereandsaywhatthey’rebeendoing,andthenwegetpeoplewanderingpastthedoorandhavinganoseinhere’.
104 Stephen Black
InoneprogramtargetingAfghanandIranianmothers,theiryoungchildrenplayedclosebyandinteractedwiththemduringtheclass.SomegroupscomprisedmainlyolderparticipantswithsomeChineseandArmeniansintheirrespectiveprogramsbeingintheir80s,thoughsomeoftheirpeersintheclasswerequiteyoung.Inoneprogram,agrandmother,daughterandgrand-daughterwereallinvolvedinsessionsforashorttime,andintergenerationalandinterfamilialfactorsofsomekindwereatplayinotherprograms.Theformaleducationlevelsofparticipantsvariedalso,withsomehavinguniversityqualificationswhileotherswereilliterateintheirownfirstlanguage.Oneelderlyparticipantwasblind.Noattemptwasmadetoscreenparticipantspriortothecourse;allwerewelcomed.AlthoughthepresentersspokeinEnglish,inseveraloftheprograms,localcommunitymembersactedasinterpreters,andthisdynamic,multi-dimensional,communicationprocess,whileappearingtoanoutsideraschaoticattimes,allowedallparticipantstocommunicateinwaystheyfeltmostcomfortableabouthealthissuestheyallfeltstronglyabout.Theselocalcommunity/networkaspectswereverysignificantinfacilitatingtheinformalpedagogicalapproachintheprograms,andtheyareindicativeofthesocialcapitalelementsdiscussedinthefollowingsection.
‘Empowerment’ and a social capital approach
Alltheprogramsinvolvedasimilarpedagogicalapproach,withtheadultliteracyteachersbeingemployedintheoneTAFEcollege,andthuslikelytosharesimilarpedagogicalperspectives.Interestingly,therewasnohintofdissonancefromthehealthprofessionalswiththepedagogicalapproachtaken.Thediscoursesofadultliteracypedagogyandpublichealthinparticularsharesomesimilarthemes,withastrongfocusoncommunityandindividualempowerment,andeventhebackgroundinfluenceofeducationalphilosopherssuchasFreire(e.g.seeLaverack2004:51).
Diabetes literacy 105
Recentadultliteracyresearchhasdemonstratedhowparticularteachingstrategiesresultinsocialcapitaloutcomes(Balatti,Black&Falk2006,2009),andthepresentationofdiabetesknowledgeintheprogramswasundertakeninawaythatencouragedthesocialcapitalconceptsofbonding,bridgingandlinkingties.
Bonding tiesarethestrongtiesthatbuildcohesionandcommonpurposewithinthelearninggroup.Thereweremanywaysthatbondingwasencouragedwithintheprograms,andinparticularitinvolvedbuildingtrustwhichrequires‘encouragingpeopletogettoknowoneanotherandcreatinganon-judgmentalclimateinwhichpeoplefeelsafetosharelifeexperiencesandtomakeerrorsastheyarelearning’(Balatti,Black&Falk2009:23).
Oneliteracyteachersaidsheandthedietitiandeliberatelysatdownwiththeparticipantsinthesessionsratherthanstandup,‘sowedidn’thavethattypeofusandthemkindofthing,sowewerealloneyecontact’.Activitiesinthesessionswerealsoasnon-threateningaspossible.Forexample,ratherthanaskifanyparticipantshadtype2diabetes,participantswereaskediftheyhadorknewofanyfamilymemberswiththedisease.Participantsalsodidgroupactivitiesbasedontheirdietratherthanitemisetheirpersonalfooditemsoverasetperiod,whichmighthavebeenconfrontingorembarrassingtosomeparticipants.Thecommunityinterpreterswerealsoveryhelpfulasmediatorsinreducingthesocialdistancebetweenpresentersandparticipants.
Tonurtureasenseofbelonging,sessionsincludedalotofgroupdiscussionandworkinginpairs,andparticipantswereencouragedtosharetheirviewpointsandtheirlifeexperiences.Groupcohesionwasassistedbythehealthprofessionalsaccommodatingtheexpressedneedsofindividualparticipants,evenwhentheywerenotdirectlyrelatedtodiabetesprevention.Forexample,oneelderlyparticipantwantedtoknowaboutosteoporosis,whichthedietitiansubsequentlydiscussedwiththegroup,andanotherparticipantwithdiagnosed
106 Stephen Black
type2diabetesbroughthisownglucosereadingsalongforthedietitiantoadvisehimon.
Theexercisecomponentofoneprogramalsoencouragedgroupcohesion.TheTaiChivideowhichthepresentersshowedtothegroup,whileuseful,wassoonabandonedastheolderChineseparticipantsdemonstratedtothepresenterstheirownlocalformofTaiChi.Thesessionwas,inthewordsoftheteacher,‘veryphysicalandtogether,reallyconnecting…’.Thissessioninturnseemedtoencouragethegrouptofocusonotherformsofdanceinthenextsession,furtheringbondingwithinandbetweenparticipantsandthepresenters,astheliteracyteacherindicated:
…andtheywouldalllaugh,andthentheotheronewouldgetthemtoshowthemsomekindofdance...andtheyareshowingeachotherdifferentdancemovesandthingsthisweek,I’vekindofnoticedthat,socialaspectsofthem…itwasverynice,butitwasaveryrolereversal,theywereshowinguswhattodo…Butitwasreallylovely,andtheywerelovingit,andIwasgettingmyrightandleftwrongallthetime...
EvidenceofincreasedbondingandtrustinthegroupwhichresultedfromthispedagogicalapproachwasprovidedinoneChinesegroupwithparticipantsincreasinglyadmittingtohavingtype2diabetes.Thisappearsrelevantbecausethereisevidenceintheresearchliteraturethatsomeethnicgroups,includingtheChinese,feelstigmatisedbyacknowledgingtheirdiabetescondition(Colagiuri,Thomas&Buckley2007:22).Andyet,assessionsprogressedandparticipantsfeltmoreateaseintheirgroup,theywereaskingspecificquestionsrelatingtotheirowncondition,includingbringingalongtheirownmedicalrecordstodiscusswiththedietitian.Asthedietitiannoted,‘IthinkinthefirstweekorsoIwasawarethatonepersonactuallyhadtype2diabetes.Bytheend(aftersevenweeks),therewerestillpeoplecomingoutofthewoodwork’.
Diabetes literacy 107
Bridging ties, whicharelinksbetweengroupsofpeoplewhoaredifferent,andlinking ties,thoselinkstoinstitutions,werealsoencouraged.Therewereinstances,forexample,ofthepresenterstryingtoencourageparticipantstojoinwalkinggroupsoralocalgymorswimmingclubordancinggroupinordertoincreaselevelsofphysicalactivity.Someparticipantswereencouragedtogetinvolvedinacommunitygardenprojectinonelocalarea,andlocalexcursions(wherepossible)wereafeatureofeachprogram.Inallprograms,linksweremadetolocalhealthinstitutionsprovidingspecialiseddiabetesservices.
Thepedagogywasthussituatedintheeverydaylivesoftheparticipantsintheirowncommunities.Whilethetwopresentersdidhaveapre-conceivedideaofthestructureoftheprogramsessions(outlinedearlier),theaimwasnottoadoptadeficitapproachandimpartknowledgetounknowingparticipants.Veryquicklysessionsfollowedthedirectionoftheparticipants’interests.SessionsondietinoneprogramforChineseresidents,forexample,ledtoheateddiscussionsaboutdifferenttypesofrice,therelevantcoststopurchase(ricewithalowerglycemicindex[GI]tendstobemoreexpensive),andculturalvaluesinconflictwithhealthiestoptions.Thisledtoacompromisehealthmessageofeatingsmallerservingsofrice,butmorevegetables.Culturalvaluesrelatingtodifferenttypesofcookingoilweresimilarlydiscussedandnegotiated,andseeminglystraightforwardconceptssuchaswhatismeantby‘apieceoffruit’werethesubjectofcontestation.Theparticipantscouldbeseentocompriselearning‘communitiesofpractice’,withlargelysharedethnicandculturalvalues,andmuchoftheirlearningintheprogramsresultedfromdiscussionswitheachother.Interestingly,theoneprogramwherethisdidnotworkquitesoeffectivelywastheonedeliveredintheTAFEcollege.Inthisprogramtheparticipants,whilecomprisinga‘student’communityofpractice,featuredgreaterdiversityintheirlanguageandculturalbackgrounds,andtheclassroomseatingarrangements(atseparatetablesandinrows)did
108 Stephen Black
notencouragethesamelevelofdialogueandself-direction.Inthisprogramtherewasgreaterfocusonteacher-developed‘worksheets’,whichgavetheprogrammoreaflavourofformallearning,incontrasttotheinformalityofprogramsdeliveredinthelocalneighbourhoodcentresorpublichousinghalls.
Conclusions
Healthprofessionalsprovidingeducationonpreventingtype2diabetestovariousCALDgroupsinlocalcommunitycontextsisnotnew(seeColagiuri,Thomas&Buckley2007).Buttherearefeaturesofthisproject,includingthevariousorganisationalpartnerships,andadultliteracyteachersandhealthprofessionalsworkingtogetherwithinasocialcapitalpedagogy,thatmakethisprojectinnovativeandpotentiallyusefulasamodelforotherhealthliteracyinitiatives.
Intheliteraturereview,Rudd(2002),awellknownhealthliteracyspecialist,refersto‘amaturingpartnership’betweentheliteracyandthehealthsectorsintheUnitedStates.Bycomparison,andadoptingtherelationshipmetaphor,thiswouldmakepartnershipsbetweenthetwosectorsinAustralia,suchasthosefeaturedinthisproject,akinto‘afirstdate’.Asindicatedintheliteraturereview,thereareveryfewdocumentedcasesinAustraliaofhealthandliteracyprofessionalsworkinginpartnership.
Thispaperindicatestoalargeextentthepotentialforadultliteracyteachersandhealthpractitionerstoworktogethereffectively.Theyappeartosharetheaimsofindividualandcommunityempowerment,andtheycanworkcollaborativelyusingpedagogicalapproachesthatencouragesuchempowerment.However,thisprojectwasessentiallyapilotstudy,aone-off,government-funded,innovativehealthliteracyproject,andtomovebeyondpilotstudiestomoresystematicinitiativesrequiresgreaterresourcecommitments.Whilethisprojectfeaturedorganisationalpartnershipsatthemicro(theteachinginterface)andmeso(middleorganisational)levels,whatAustralia
Diabetes literacy 109
lacksintheareaofhealthliteracyarepartnershipsatthemacrolevel—betweenpeakgovernment,healthandliteracy/educationalorganisations(seeBalatti,Black&Falk2009),whichwouldprovidesomepolicydirection,stablefundingandsustainabilitytohealthliteracyprogramsinAustralia.Thesediabetesliteracyprogramshopefullywillencourageastepinthatdirection.
References
AustralianBureauofStatistics(ABS)(2004).Measuring social capital: An Australian framework and indicators, Informationpaper,CatalogueNo.1378.0,Canberra:ABS.
AustralianBureauofStatistics(ABS)(2007).Adult literacy and life skills survey,CatalogueNo.4228.0,Canberra:ABS.
AustralianBureauofStatistics(ABS)(2008).Health literacy, Australia,2006,CatalogueNo.4233.0,Canberra:ABS.
AustralianBureauofStatistics(ABS)(2011).Diabetes in Australia: A snapshot, 2007–08,CatalogueNo.4820.0.55.001,Canberra:ABS.
AustralianCentreforDiabetesStrategies(2005).A national profile of diabetes projects for culturally and linguistically diverse community groups,Sydney:AustralianCentreforDiabetesStrategies.
AustralianInstituteofHealth&Welfare(AIHW)(2003).‘Apictureofdiabetesinoverseas-bornAustralians’,AIHW Bulletin,Issueno.9.
AustralianInstituteofHealth&Welfare(AIHW)(2008).Diabetes: Australian facts 2008,Canberra:AIHW.
AustralianInstituteofHealthandWelfare(AIHW)(2011).Diabetes prevalence in Australia: Detailed estimates for 2007–08,Canberra:AIHW.
Balatti,J.,Black,S.&Falk,I.(2006).Reframing adult literacy and numeracy course outcomes: A social capital perspective,Adelaide:NationalCentreforVocationalEducationResearch.
Balatti,J.,Black,S.&Falk,I.(2009).A new social capital paradigm for adult literacy: Partnerships, policy and pedagogy,Adelaide:NationalCentreforVocationalEducationResearch.
Balatti,J.&Black,S.(2011).‘Constructinglearnersasmembersofnetworks’,inCatts,R.,Falk,I.&Wallace,R.(eds.),Vocational learning: Innovative theory and practice,Dordrecht,Springer:63–76.
110 Stephen Black
Black,S.,Innes,C.&Chopra,M.(2008).Diabetes literacy: A partnership approach to educating culturally and linguistically diverse people about the risks and prevention of type 2 diabetes,Sydney:NorthernSydneyInstitute/NorthernSydneyCentralCoastAreaHealthService.
Black,S.&Yasukawa,K.(2011).Working together: Integrated language, literacy and numeracy support in vocational education and training,Sydney:UniversityofTechnology,Sydney.
Brough,M.,Henderson,G.,Foster,R.&Douglas,H.(2007).‘SocialcapitalandAboriginalandTorresStraitIslanderhealth—problemsandpossibilities’inAnderson,I.,Baum,F.&Bentley,M(eds.),Proceedings of social determinants of Aboriginal health workshop,Adelaide:191–201.
Burns,A.(1999).Collaborative action research for English language teachers,Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.
Campbell,C.(2001).‘Socialcapitalandhealth:Contextualisinghealthpromotionwithinlocalcommunitynetworks’inBaron,S.,Field,J.&Schuller,T.(eds.),Social capital: Critical perspectives,Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.
Colagiuri,R.,Thomas,M.&Buckley,A.(2007).Preventing type 2 diabetes in culturally and linguistically diverse communities in NSW,Sydney:NSWDepartmentofHealth.
Courtenay,M.&Mawer,G.(1995).Integrating English language, literacy and numeracy into vocational educationand training: A framework, Sydney:TAFENSW.
Deitrick,L.,Paxton,H.,Rivera,A.,Gertner,E.,Biery,N.,Letcher,A.,Lahoz,L.,Maldonado,E.&Sala-Lopez,D.(2010).‘UnderstandingtheroleofthepromotorainaLatinodiabeteseducationprogram’,Qualitative Health Research,20(3):386–399.
DiabetesAustralia.(2007).National priorities for turning around the diabetes epidemic 2007–2008,Canberra:DiabetesAustralia.
Figgis,J.(2004).Literate Australia: A whole life approach. Report no.1: Taking literacy to fresh fields,Canberra:AustralianCouncilforAdultLiteracy.
Freebody,P.&Freiberg,J.(1999).‘Healthliteracyandsocialpractices:ResponsestoNutbeam’,Literacy & Numeracy Studies,9(2):57–66.
Gillies,P.(1998).‘Effectivenessofalliancesandpartnershipsforhealthpromotion’,Health Promotion International,13(2):99–120.
Green,J.,LoBianco,J.&Wyn,J.(2007).‘Discoursesininteraction:Theintersectionofliteracyandhealthresearchinternationally’,Literacy & Numeracy Studies,15(2):19–37.
Diabetes literacy 111
Hartley,R.&Horne,J.(2006).Social and economic benefits of improved adult literacy: Towards a better understanding, Adelaide:NationalCentreforVocationalEducationResearch.
Hohn,M.(1998).Empowerment health education in adult literacy: A guide for public health and adult literacy practitioners, policy makers and funders,Massachusetts:NationalInstituteforLiteracy.
Kawachi,I.,Subramanian,S.&Kim,D.(2008).Social capital and health: A decade of progress and beyond,Dordrecht:Springer.
Keleher,H.&Hagger,V.(2007).‘Healthliteracyinprimaryhealthcare’,Australian Journal of Primary Health Care,13(2):24–30.
Keleher,H.&Murphy,B.(eds.)(2004).Understanding health: A determinants approach,Melbourne:OxfordUniversityPress.
Kemmis,S.&McTaggart,R.(1988).The action research planner,Geelong:DeakinUniversity.
Kickbusch,I.,Wait,S.&Maag,D.(2005).Navigating health: The role of health literacy,London:AllianceforHealthandtheFuture.
Lave,J.&Wenger,E.(1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation,NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.
Laverack,G.(2004).Health promotion practice: Power and empowerment,London:Sage.
McKenna,R.&Fitzpatrick,L.(2005).Integrated approaches to teaching adult literacy in Australia: A snapshot of practice in community services,Adelaide:NationalCentreforVocationalEducationResearch.
NationalHealthandMedicalResearchCouncil(NHMRC)(2006).Cultural competency in health: A guide for policy, partnerships and participation,Canberra:NHMRC.
Nielsen_Bohlman,L.,Panzar,A.&Kindig,D.(eds.)(2004).Health literacy: A prescription to end confusion, Washington,DC:InstituteofMedicine.
Nutbeam,D.,Wise,M.,Bauman,A.,Harris,E.&Leeder,S.(1993).Goals and targets for Australia’s health in the year 2000 and beyond, Canberra:AustralianGovernmentPublishingService.
Nutbeam,D.(1999).‘Literaciesacrossthelifespan:Healthliteracy’,Literacy & Numeracy Studies,9(2):47–55.
OrganisationforEconomicCooperationandDevelopment(OECD)(2001).The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital,Paris:OECD.
Peerson,A.&Saunders,M.(2009).‘Healthliteracyrevisited:Whatdowemeanandwhydoesitmatter?’,Health Promotion International,24(3):285–296.
112 Stephen Black
Rootman,I.&Gordon-El-Bihbety,D.(2008).A vision for a health literacy Canada: Report of the expert panel on health literacy,Ottawa:CanadianPublicHealthAssociation.
Rudd,R.(2002).Amaturingpartnership,Focus on Basics,vol.5,IssueC,viewed22Oct2011<www.ncsall.net/?id=771&pid=247>.
Schecter,S.&Lynch,J.(2011).‘Healthlearningandadulteducation:Insearchofatheoryofpractice’,Adult Education Quarterly,61(3): 207–224.
Simich,L.(2009).Health literacy and immigrant populations,policybriefpreparedattherequestofPublicHealthAgencyofCanada,Ottawa.
Sissel,P.&Hohn,M.(1995).‘Literacyandhealthcommunities:Potentialpartnersinpractice’,New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,70:59–71.
Szreter,S.&Woolcock,M.(2004).‘Healthbyassociation?Socialcapital,socialtheory,andthepoliticaleconomyofpublichealth’,International Journal of Epidemiology,33(4):650–667.
TheTavistockInstitute(2009).Evaluation of the second phase of the skilled for health programme: Final evaluation report,London:TheTavistockInstitute.
Thow,A.&WatersA.(2005).Diabetes in culturally and linguistically diverse Australians: Identification of communities at high risk, Canberra:AIHW.
Wenger,E.(1998).Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity,NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.
Wickert,R.&McGuirk,J.(2005).Integrating literacies: Using partnerships to build literacy capabilities in communities,Adelaide:NationalCentreforVocationalEducationResearch.
Wilkinson,R.&Marmot,M.(eds.)(2003).Social determinants of health: The solid facts,2ndedition,Denmark:WorldHealthOrganisation.
Wolff,K.,Cananagh,K.,Malone,R.,Hawk,V.,Pratt-Gregory,B.,Davis,D.,Wallston,K.&Rothman,R.(2009).‘Thediabetesliteracyandnumeracytoolkit(DLNET):Materialstofacilitatediabeteseducationandmanagementinpatientswithlowliteracyandnumeracyskills’,The Diabetes Educator,35(2):233–245.
Zarcadoolas,C.,Pleasant,A.&Greer,D.(2005).‘Understandinghealthliteracy:Anexpandedmodel’,Health Promotion International,20(2):195–203.
Zimmet,P.&James,W.(2006).‘Theunstoppableobesityanddiabetesjuggernaut’,Medical Journal of Australia, 185(4):187–188.
Diabetes literacy 113
About the author
Stephen Black is a Senior Researcher in the Centre for Research in Learning and Change at the University of Technology, Sydney. Most of Stephen’s research has been in areas relating to adult literacy studies. His PhD is 2001 was entitled ‘Literacy as critical social practice’, and most of his research has been located within socio-cultural understandings of literacy, including recent work on social capital with Jo Balatti and Ian Falk, and integrated literacy and numeracy with Keiko Yasukawa.
Contact details
Centre for Research in Learning and Change, University of Technology, Sydney, Building 10, Level 5, 235 Jones Street, Broadway 2007Tel: (02) 9514 4590 Fax: (02) 9514 3939Email: [email protected]