Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
University of Delaware, 1999
Detection and Characterization ofCorrosion of Bridge Cables byTime Domain Reflectometry
Wei Liu, Robert Hunsperger, Kevin Folliard, Michael Chajes,Jignesh Barot, Darshan Jhaveri, Eric Kunz
Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Univ. of Delaware
Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware
VETEK System Corp.
University of Delaware, 1999
Outline
• Introduction
• Transmission Line
• Modeling Bridge Cables
• Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR)
• Experimental Results
• Conclusions
University of Delaware, 1999
Introduction
• Corrosion of metallic reinforcement is amajor threat to aging infrastructure
• Current NDE methods
V isua l Mechanica l E lectrica l
N D E
University of Delaware, 1999
A new NDE technique usingTime Domain Reflectometry
(TDR)• TDR has traditionally been used to detect
discontinuities in a transmission lineTransmission line• Steel cable
Defects Discontinuities• TDR can detect, locate and identify the
extent of defects
University of Delaware, 1999
What is a transmission line?
• A wave guiding system which consists oftwo or more parallel conductors
• Examples: telephone lines, television cables
• What is the difference between transmissionlines and conventional circuits? --- SIZE
University of Delaware, 1999
Transmission Line
Distributed parameter equivalent circuitZ Z+ ∆ Z
R ∆ Z L ∆ Z
G ∆ Z C ∆Z
Z+∆ZZ
An incremental length of transmission line
University of Delaware, 1999
Characteristic Impedance
CjG
LjRZ
ωω
++=0
Discontinuity: Impedance Mismatch
0ZZ ≠
University of Delaware, 1999
Modeling Bridge Cables
Steelcable
Sensorwire
Grout
Tube
abd
University of Delaware, 1999
Characteristic Impedance
)(cosh2
22221
abbad
C−−−
= πε
CGandLR ωω <<<< ,
−−=≈ −
abbad
CLZ
2cosh
21 222
10 ε
µπ
Physical Defects Impedance Mismatch
)(cosh2 2
2221
abbadL −−−=
πµ
University of Delaware, 1999
Small Changes of Dimension
( )( ) ( ) 4222222
2220
2
121
aabdbd
abd
ada
dZ
++−−
+−−=εµ
π
22
220 1
21
,
adad
ada
dZ
dbwhen
−+−≈
<<
εµ
π
Impedance will increase for a small decrease of a.
University of Delaware, 1999
Impedance vs Radius a
Impe
danc
e (O
hm)
Radius of the Steel Cable (cm)
University of Delaware, 1999
Time Domain Reflectometry
Pulse Generator
Oscilloscope
Transmission LineZl
Load
University of Delaware, 1999
Excitation Signals
Step wave Pulse
Rise Time: the time required for the voltage to rise from 10% to 90% of the final value
University of Delaware, 1999
How TDR works?
University of Delaware, 1999
Analyzing Reflections
0
0
ZZ
ZZ
V
V
i
r
+−
==ρ
Voltage reflection coefficient
2
TvD p=
Open circuit
∞=ZiV
ir VV =
0 T
Short circuit
0=ZiV ir VV −=
0 T
University of Delaware, 1999
Experimental Results
University of Delaware, 1999
Severity of Defect
Seven-strand prestressing cable with broken strands
Six broken strands Two broken strands
University of Delaware, 1999
Multiple Defects
University of Delaware, 1999
Cable-to-wire Distance
abd
321 ddd <<
1dd =
2dd = 3dd =
University of Delaware, 1999
System Risetime Tr
Tr=500ps Tr=1.0ns
Tr=2.0ns Tr=3.0ns
University of Delaware, 1999
External Sensor Wire
• Suitable for existing bridges
• Larger distance less sensitive
• Able to detect serious corrosion
University of Delaware, 1999
Noise in the Measurement
• Random noise
• Repeatable noise ------ nearby conductorsvariations of d
University of Delaware, 1999
Baseline Comparison
New MeasurementBaseline Measurement
University of Delaware, 1999
Conclusions
• TDR can be effectively used as an NDEtechnique for defects detection;
• It can detect, locate and identify the extentof defects;
• It is suitable to both new and existingbridges;
• TDR can be applied to not only bridges butalso other steel reinforced structures.
University of Delaware, 1999
Modeling Different Types ofDefects
• Abrupt pitting corrosion
• General surface corrosion
• Void in grout
University of Delaware, 1999
Typical TDR Reflections
Shunt-RC
Shunt-RL
Series-RC
Series-RL