31

Design Challenges

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Design Challenges
Page 2: Design Challenges

Design Challenges & Solutions for Large Diameter Export Risers

Elizabeth Tellier, Hugh Howells & Mark Cerkovnik2H Offshore Engineering

AOG 2011

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 3: Design Challenges

Agenda

WA export riser design challenges

Development options & design parameters

Current industry examples

Export riser types and design limitations

Alternative large diameter export riser arrangements

More gas developments Higher gas volume Large diameter export systemsLearn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 4: Design Challenges

WA Export Riser Design Challenges

Severe environments

Cyclones

Swells

Floaters in ‘shallow’ water

Long service lives (40+ years)

Design for larger return periods

Sour service

Minimal processing on vessel

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 5: Design Challenges

Development Options

Export Risers

Flexible

Steel Catenary Riser (SCR)

Top Tension Riser (TTR)

Freestanding Hybrid Riser (FSHR)

Vessel

Semi Submersible

TLP

FPSO

Spar

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 6: Design Challenges

Design Parameters

Gas developments

Water depths 300m to 1,300m

Flexible riser ID 16”+

Steel riser OD 18” +

Operating Pressure 135 to 550 bar

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 7: Design Challenges

Large Diameter Risers Current Industry Examples

Riser Type

Field Name

Water Depth(m)

Max OD/ID

(in)

Vessel Type

Location

FlexibleBonga 370 18.6 FPSO Nigeria

Statfjord B 145 19 FPSO NS Nor

SCR

Prince 450 12 TLP GoM

Ind. Hub 2,400 20 Semi GoM

Thunder Horse 2,150 24 Semi GoM

TTRSnorre 320 20 TLP NS Nor

Heidrun 350 24 TLP NS Nor

FSHRKizomba 1,015 12.75 FPSO Angola

P52 1,800 18 FPU BrazilLearn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 8: Design Challenges

Flexible Pipe Technology Limits Large Diameter Risers

Qualified – 19”, 500m WD, 1500psi (103 Bar)

17.0 18.4 18.4 18.4 18.5 18.5 18.6 18.6 18.6 18.7 18.9 18.9 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0

28

270 270 270

650 650

370 370 370 370

85 85145 145 145 145 145 145

8

50 50 5043 43 50 50 50 50 49 49

34 34 34 34 34 34

1

10

100

1000

Wat

er D

epth

(m)/D

esig

n Pr

essu

re (b

ar)

Internal Diameter (in)

Design Pressure (bar)Water Depth (m)

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 9: Design Challenges

Steel Catenary Risers (SCR) Large Diameter Limits

GoM Projects Large Diameter SCR by Function and Vessel Type

15161718192021222324252627282930

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000

Water Depth (m)

Out

er D

iam

eter

(in

ch)

TLP Oil Export SCR Spar Oil Export Semi Oil Export SCRTLP Gas Export SCR Spar Gas Export Semi Gas Export SCR

TLP/Spar Semi

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 10: Design Challenges

Why might WA export risers be different?

Many riser system variations evaluated in the past

Gulf of Mexico

Deep and Ultra deep water (1,000m to 2,500m+)

Predominately Oil service

Harsh environment

West Africa

Deep water (1,300m to 2,700m)

Predominately Oil service

Mild environment

Norwegian Sea/West of Shetland

Shallow and marginally deep water (350m to 1000m)

Gas and oil

Harsh environment

Australia’s NWS does not fully fit into any of these categories

Water depth (300m to 1300m)

Gas

Harsh environment

Modifications may be needed for robust riser solutions

Alternative arrangements based on extensive work done previously for WoS and Norwegian SeaLearn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 11: Design Challenges

Steel Catenary Risers (SCR) and Alternatives

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 12: Design Challenges

SCR Challenges Buckling

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 13: Design Challenges

SCR Alternatives Weight Optimization

Weighting near touchdown improves performance

OMAE 29049, 2007

Weighting

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 14: Design Challenges

STATIC RESULTANT CURVATURENo Environmental Loading

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000

Distance From Vessel (m)

Cur

vatu

re (1

000/

m)

Bare SCR Heavy Coating Clump Weight

SCR Alternatives Weight Optimization

SCR curvature in TD zone is reduced by 20% with additional weight

OMAE 29049, 2007Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 15: Design Challenges

Lazy Wave Catenaries 800m

Plan length 1.25 – 2.5 x water depth

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 16: Design Challenges

Lazy Wave Lazy Wave CatenaryCatenary Response Response Large Diameter/Deep WaterLarge Diameter/Deep Water

28in, 2300m water depth

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 17: Design Challenges

Lazy Wave Lazy Wave CatenaryCatenary Response Response Effect of Internal Fluid Effect of Internal Fluid –– 3030”” ODOD

Water filled

Gas filled

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 18: Design Challenges

SCR Vessel Interface Design

Flex-joints

Historic failures

Pressure cycles

High Temperature

Larger diameter – increased stiffness

Gas service – high and low temp

24”, 90C, 3700psi (255 bar)

Stress Joints

Large loads from vessel offset

Multiple forgings for large diameters

Titanium alternative

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 19: Design Challenges

SCR Alternatives Bottom Weighted Riser

Flex Joint/Elbow and WeightAssembly

Vertical Section

Tether (3 Off) Horizontal SectionPile Foundation

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 20: Design Challenges

SCR Alternatives Bottom Weighted Riser

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 21: Design Challenges

SCR Alternative Tethered Riser Buoy

Petrobras Pre Salt Development

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 22: Design Challenges

Top Tensioned Risers

Wellbay interface

Large valve stacks

Flexible jumper

Congestion/routing of topside piping

Stroke sensitive

Connector design

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 23: Design Challenges

Export TTR Alternatives Jumper Arrangements

30” OD TTR

Single 24” rigid jumper with flex joints

Multiple 12” rigid jumper with flex joints

Multiple 12” titanium jumpers

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 24: Design Challenges

Export TTR Base Arrangement

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 25: Design Challenges

Freestanding Hybrid Riser

Clearance issues

Large spatial requirement

Size of flexible jumper ID

Pigging

Solutions

Dual Jumpers

Bundle with multiple jumpers/modified manifold

Use of intervention vessel for pigging

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 26: Design Challenges

FSHR Alternative Dual Flexible Jumpers

OTC 17521, 2005Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 27: Design Challenges

FSHR Alternative Bundle

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 28: Design Challenges

Bundle Riser Base with 30in Core

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 29: Design Challenges

Summary

Current and future production systems for offshore Western Australia require the use of large diameter risers for export of gas

Riser design limits may impact the selection of production facility

Export riser choice dependant on water depth, diameter, vessel and environment

Flexible riser greater than 16”ID - limited by water depth and pressure ratings

SCR, TTR and FSHR are optimal solutions for large diameter export riser solutions in WD>500m

Use of Norway NS and WOS concepts and current GoM deep water riser technology will enable feasible riser solutions for NWS

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 30: Design Challenges

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com

Page 31: Design Challenges

Learn more at www.2hoffshore.com