Upload
emery-boyd
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Design and Analysis of Clinical Study 6. Case-control Study
Dr. Tuan V. Nguyen
Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Sydney, Australia
What is Case-Control ?
• Traditional view: compare - people who get the disease - people who do not get the disease
• “Controls” a misnomer, derived from faulty analogy to controls in experiment
• Modern conceptualization: controls are a “window” into the “study base”
Case – Control Study
• Grouping studied: "cases" vs. "Control" group(s).
• Measurements analyzed: past "exposures.“
• Case-selection usually clinic- or hospital-based.
• Controls may also be clinic- or hospital-based, or population-sampled.
• Controls may be unmatched, group-matched, or individually matched.
Case-Control Study
Cases
Controls
Population at risk
Yes
No
Yes
No
Case-Control Study
Cases
Controls
Population at risk
Aspirin use
No Aspirin use
Aspirin use
No Aspirin use
Steps in Designing Case-control Studies
• Selection of cases
– Precise definition of ‘case’.
– Inclusion / Exclusion criteria.
– Are cases to be ‘incident’ or ‘prevalent’?
– How are cases to be identified? How recruited?
Steps in Designing Case-control Studies
• Selection of Controls
– Source ( hospital patients without disease; neighbourhood controls; random sample of population; sibs).
– Inclusion / exclusion criteria.
– Match to cases?
Steps in Designing Case-control Studies
• Collection of information
– Identify risk factor of interest
– Method of collection of information ( questionnaire; medical records; employment records)
– Same procedure to be used for cases and controls
– Interviewer should be unaware who is a case and who a control.
Two Methods of Selection
• Select new cases (i.e.incident) as they come up. Controls are selected from those in the same setting at the same time.
• Select existing cases (prevalent) from a defined population. From the same population a larger number of controls are identified.
The Incident type of case-control study is stronger because diagnosis of cases and ascertainment of exposure is being done by the researcher.
Results of a Case-Control Study
Risk factorDisease
Yes (cases) No (controls)
Aspirin Use a c
No Aspirin Use b d
Total N1 N2
N1 and N2 are fixed numbers
Nested Case-Control Study
• Case-control studies within a cohort study
• In ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) study, a cohort of 16 thousand men, all men provided serum samples at the outset which were saved.
• The cohort is observed for CHD.
• After 5 years we have 246 cases of CHD.
• We randomly choose 500 participants to be controls.
• We only measure Chlamydia antibody in the stored sera from these 246 + 500 subjects.
• We compare the cases (CHD) to the controls (no CHD) with regard to the presence of exposure (Chlamydia) which preceded the outcome
Matched Case-Control Studies
cases
Non-cases
cases
Non-cases
All cases or random sample
Cases
Random sample of non-cases
Cases All cases or random sample
Controls
Controls
Matched controls
Effects of Beta-blocker on Hip Fracture
• Select a hip fracture case
• Note the patient’s age, sex, weight, bone mineral density (BMD)
• Select a sample of controls
• Randomly selected k controls who have the same age, weight, and BMD as the case
Potential Biases
• A knowledge of the patient's disease status may influence: – Both the intensity and outcome of a search for
exposure to the putative cause
• A late look at those exposed (or affected) early will miss: – Fatal and other short episodes, plus mild or silent
cases and cases in which evidence of exposure disappears with disease onset
COHORT VS. CASE-CONTROL STUDIES OF CHD VS. CHOLESTEREMIA AMONG MEN
UPPER QUARTILE SERUM CHOLESTEROL
COHORT STUDY CASE-CONTROL STUDY
CHD BY EXAM 6 CHD BY EXAM 6 YES NO TOTAL YES NO TOTAL
YES 85 462 547 38 34 72NO 116 1511 1627 113 117 230TOTAL 201 1973 2174 151 151 302
ODDS RATIO = 2.40 ODDS RATIO = 1.16
Sample Size Calculation
• Power : probability of detecting a real effect (eg = 0.20)• Alpha level : probability of detecting a false effect (eg =
0.05)
• P0 : probability of exposure in controls
• P1 : probability of exposure in case subjects
• R : odds ratio of exposures between cases and controls• m : number of control subjects per case subject
Sample Size Calculation
• The estimated sample size is:
Website for Sample Size Calculation
http://www.sph.emory.edu/~cdckms/sample%20size%202%20grps%20case%20control.html
Advantages and Disadvantages of Case-control Studies
• Relatively cheap compared to cohort studies
• Relatively quick• Useful for study of rare
diseases.• No ethical problems• Useful for diseases with long
latent period.
• Estimate of disease incidence cannot be done
• At times difficult to measure exposure accurately
• Open to selection bias.• Difficult to interpret.
Advantages Disadvantages
Self-evaluation Questions
• Q2: Suppose that in a case-control study using incident cases of colon cancer you found that 80% of the cases were married. Does this demonstrate that being married increases the risk of developing cancer?
• Q2: In the same case-control study above, assume that 90% of the control group group are married. If there are 200 cases and 200 controls, estimate the risk of colon cancer for single men. Constuct a 2x2 table and determine and interpret the exposure odds ratio.