Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Der rätselhafte Protonradius-
Measurement of the proton radius in muonic hydrogen
rp=?
Motivation● Protons are the basic building block of the visible
matter in the universe
● Hydrogen (H) is the most simple bound state
● Proton properties (charge, mass, size) are essential input parameters to theories of proton and hydrogen
● proton -> quantum chromodynamics (QCD)● hydrogen and similar systems
→ bound state quantum electrodynamics (QED)
● comparison of predicted and measured energy levels in hydrogen allow precision tests of theory
● Muonic hydrogen allows more precise measurement
„To understand hydrogen is to understand all of physics“
(Victor Weisskopf, 1908-2002)
● Lepton universality theorem predicts same coupling to all gauge bosons, in particular to photons
Differences between e- and µ-
→ apart from their mass, electrons and muons should behave identical
p
e-
(ep) (µp)
● Muon is much more likely within the proton than the electron → muon „feels“ proton much stronger
µ-
Differences between (ep) and (µp)
.. x200 ..
(CODATA: Committee on Data for Science and Technology)
Outline
● What means rp ?
● Theory of hydrogen and alikes
● Measurement of rp in muonic hydrogen
● Interpretation of the result
Definition of rp
● The geometric shape of a proton is defined by it's formfactor F(q²)
● Differential cross section for elastic e-p scattering with momentum transfer q
→ Not consistent with QED
● In general the proton structure can be seperated into electric (E) and magnetic (M) formfactors (Rosenbluth-formula)
Convention: ,
Scattering angle:
„Sachs“ electric Formfactor:
~ Probability to absorb a photon
Convention:
For point-like particles:
● A series expansion of GE(Q²) leads to
Theory of hydrogen and alikes
● a bound state of two oppositely charged particles,
● solved by quantum mechanics (Schrödinger equation with central potential)
● Bound state characterised by quantum numbers: n=1,2,..; l=0,..,n-1; ml = -l … +l
● Applicable to many two-body systems:hydrogen (pe), positronium (e+e-), muonium (µe),muonic hydrogen (pµ)
(Laguerre-polynoms) (spherical harmonics)
Energy levels and light emission● In a central potential:
Hydrogen spectrum
● Stronger splitting in (µp)
● Reduced mass
Energy corrections - I● Finestructure splitting of the spectrum
● 1. Relativistic corrections (Darwin term)
● 2. L-S coupling between electron-spin (→ magnetic moment) and B-field from e-p rotation (Biot-Savart-law)
● Proton-size has no measurable impact on finestructure (∆E ~ 10 neV)
n=1 → l=0 , s=1/2 → j=1/2
n=2 → l=1 , s=1/2 → j=3/2
→ l=1 , s=1/2 → j=1/2→ l=0 , s=1/2 → j=1/2
(singulett)
(triplett)
Hyperfinestructure and Lamb-shift
● Hyperfinestructure (HFS):
● L-S coupling between Le and Sp
● much smaller effect (1/700) w.r.t Le-Se
● F = Le+ Se + Sp = J + Sp = J ± 1/2
● Lamb-shift:● Explained by quantum electrodynamics (QED)● Exchange of virtual photons between µ and p● Energy splitting:
→ HFS and Lamb-shift are sensitive to finite-size effects of the proton
Hyperfine-structure and Lamb-shift
Energy emissions:
● Decoupling of Lamb-shift and hyperfinestructure
● How does proton radius affect energy levels ?→ Pertubation theory
True Coulomb potential
Potential of a point-like proton
Probability amplitude for absorbing a photon
Using good approximation for low momentum transfer:
~
QED Feynman diagramfor muon-protoninteraction (lowest order)
→
Vacuum polarisation of virtual photon
Modification of the muon mass
Additional corrections
+ many more (~60)
Theoretical prediction of the Lamb-shift
Measurement of rp in muonic hydrogen● Measured at Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), CH
● In 1999 the first confirmed creation of µp in the 2S state was accomplished, 2009 first results
● Principal workflow – Part I:
H2
muon beam
rate < 1 µ- / msE = 3 – 6 keV
Time-of-flightdetector (ToF)
Identifies muons and provides a start signal for the pulsed laser system (coincidence trigger)
Gas tank
H2 at p= 1 mbar capturesmuons and µp atoms are formed, ~1% of the µp atoms are in longe-lived (1µs) 2S state
t=0
● Principal workflow – Part II:
µp(2S) µp(2S) → µp(2P) → µp(1S) +
Timeline (ns)0 1000
A laser system is triggered.The lasersystem creates a 5-ns laser pulse, tuneablefrom = 5.5 – 6 µm, illuminating the µp from t= 900 … 975 ns
900
975
Laser light excites (or not, in dependence of ) µp to 2P state which immediately (8.5ps) deexcites to 1S state and radiates 2 keV x-ray. X-ray detection must happen in coincidence with illumination.
Target laser cavity
LAAPD – Large area avalanche photo diodes
← Front view: - The LAAPD detect the X-rays - Plastic scintillators (red) detect electrons from µ decay
Top view → The laser cavitiymakes the laser illuminate thetarget volumehomogenously
The measurement● In dependence of the laser wavelength the rate of
2keV X-rays is measured → on-resonance
● The background rate is measured without laserilluminating the target volume → off-resonance
● Up to 13 hours of data taking per laser wavelength
● Background reduction by requiring
● X-ray photon has E ~ 2keV ● Delayed electron detected from µ- decay
after x-ray detection● No 2nd muon is detected in coincidence
(The proton radius determined from other experiments was translated into resonance frequencies)
Interpretation of the result● The discrepancy is about 75GHz, about 4 times the
natural line width of 18.6GHz
● 1. Main Systematic errors that are considered
● calibration of the laser frequency (300MHz)● Zeeman shift in 5T field (< 60MHz)● Doppler shift (<1MHz)
● → many possible effects are smaller in µp due to the smaller size and the heavy muon
(Zeeman effect)(Bohr magneton)
● 2. Theory of hydrogen is well known,uncertainties of theory are comparable toexperimental ones
● 3. „New physics“Discrepancy could be explained by breaking lepton-universality, i.e. muons and electrons behave differently→ New interactions that distinguishbetween electrons and muons
Leptoquarks● Leptoquarks are bosons (Spin=0,1) that carry
electric charge and colour charge and allow interactions between quarks (q) and leptons (l)
● Basic Feynman diagrams
Coupling constantdiffers for e and µ:
New Proton-muon interaction
Proton = uud
Proton = uud
Problems with new theories
● New interactions will also be visiblein other experiments, e.g.
● Inelastic muon-proton scattering
Proton = uud
Neutron = ddu
Result from 2013
[….]
Summary
● The theoretical and experimental aspectsof the proton radius measurementin muonic hydrogen were presented
● The experimental results differ significantly from other results and leave room to „New physics“
● Until today there is no consistentexplanation of the „proton-radius puzzle“
Backup
Probability density distribution
1s
2s 2p
Bohr radius:
Vacuum polarisation of virtual photon
Uehling potential:
Radius-independent contributionsto Lamb-shift
Radius-dependent contributionsto Lamb-shift in µp
All contributions to 2S-HFS in µp
Scheme of the experiment
Bohrsches Atommodel mit e
Weblinks
● http://www.mpg.de/849869/forschungsSchwerpunkt?c=166500
● https://www.mppmu.mpg.de/~rwagner/skript/Quarkverteilungen_Nukleon.html
● http://www.semibyte.de/wp/physics/atomphysics-qm/grundlagen-quantenmechanik-und-statistik/
● http://www.tphys.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/muether/faessler/nuclear.html
●
AbstractDie Vermessung des Protonradius ist eines der grundlegendsten Experimente der Physik und kombiniert Aspekte der Atomphysik, Quantenoptik und Quantenfeldtheorie. Neue experimentelle Techniken ermöglichen die indirekte Bestimmung des Protonradius durch die Messung der Lamb-Verschiebung in myonischem Wasserstoff. Dabei handelt es sich um einen kurzlebigen, gebundenen Zustand aus einem Proton und einem Myon. Aufgrund ihrer etwa 200 mal größeren Masse sind Myonen viel näher am Proton und die Aufspaltung der Energieniveaus stark sensitiv auf die Größe des Protons.Vor kurzem durchgeführte Experimente mit myonischen Wasserstoff zeigen dabei eine Abweichung des so bestimmten Protonradius von 7 Standardabweichungen im Vergleich zu normalen Wasserstoff. Dies könnte ein Hinweis sein auf neue Wechselwirkungen jenseitsder bekannten Physik.In meinem Vortrag werde ich auf die theoretischen und experimentellen Aspekte des Versuches eingehen und möglicheSchlussfolgerungen vorstellen.