DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION€¦ · Hwy Maintenance and Transportation Engin The Department of Transportation is a diverse department charged with developing and maintaining Milwaukee

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

DOT Structure and Functions

Airport Division GMIA and TimmermanHighway Division Hwy Maintenance and

Transportation Engin

The Department of Transportation is a diverse department charged with developing and maintaining Milwaukee County’s transportation infrastructure. A highly available and well maintained transportation infrastructure is critical to economic competitiveness and quality of life throughout the region.

Fleet Maintenance Division

Transit Division through MTS, Inc.Director’s Office

$0

$50,000,000

$100,000,000

$150,000,000

$200,000,000

$250,000,000

$300,000,000

2012 2013 2014Adopted Budget

Expenditure

Revenue

Tax Levy

Expenditure Revenue Tax LevyTax Levy % of Expenditures

2012 $283,373,133 $265,508,735 $17,864,404 6.30%

2013 $281,550,587 $262,952,488 $18,598,099 6.60%

2014 $274,406,299 $255,758,534 $18,647,765 6.79%

DOT Financials

$889,214

$18,518,717

$-

$5,000,000

$10,000,000

$15,000,000

$20,000,000

Airport Highway Fleet Transit DirOffice

2014 Budgeted Tax Levy

Of the 6.79% of overall MCDOT operations that are funded with tax levy: 4.5 % Highway

95.5 % Transit

DOT Tax Levy

273.6 128.1

35.0

1,058.0

6.0 0

200400600800

1,0001,200

Airport Highway Fleet Transit Director'sOffice

2014 Budgeted FTEs = 1,500.7

DOT Workforce

AIRPORT DIVISION

Albuquerque International Sunport (ABQ)Anchorage Ted Stevens Int’l Airport (ANC)Buffalo Niagara Int’l Airport (BUF)Columbus (Port Columbus) Int’l Airport (CMH)Cincinnati (Northern Kentucky) Int’l Airport (CVG) Indianapolis Int’l Airport (IND)Pittsburgh Int’l Airport (PIT) St. Louis (Lambert) Int’l Airport (STL)

Airport Benchmark Peer Group

4,927,558 4,759,315

3,780,315 3,240,900

3,156,600 3,168,825

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

6,000,000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Year

Historical

2014 Budget

Benchmark

Airport: Annual Enplanements

Target Direction Actual Direction

46 48

40

33

33 33

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Year

Historical

2014

Benchmark

Airport: Nonstop Destinations


$4.12 $5.17 $6.14

$8.16

$9.29 $10.00

$0

$2

$4

$6

$8

$10

$12

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Year

Historical

2014 Budget

Benchmark

Airport: Airline Cost Per Enplanement


59.94% 64.24% 63.72% 64.95%62.61%

42.80%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Year

Historical

2014 Budget

Benchmark

Airport: Non-Airline Revenue as % of Operating Revenue


4.06

4.01 4.02 4.02

4.10

3.92

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Year

Historical

2014 Budget

Benchmark

Airport: Customer Satisfaction Survey


TRANSIT DIVISION

Cincinnati, OHCleveland, OHColumbus, OHDenver, CODetroit, MI Indianapolis, INKansas City, KSLouisville, KY*Final peer systems still TBD

Transit Benchmark Peer Group*

Minneapolis, MNOakland, CAPittsburgh, PARhode Island St. Louis, MO

31.4%30.8% 30.9%

31.4%

28.2%

25%

27%

29%

31%

33%

35%

2011 2012 2013 2014Year

Historical

2014 Budget

2014 YTD

Transit: FareboxRecovery


29.26

27.66 27.45

29.11

26.33

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

2011 2012 2013 2014Year

Historical

2014 Budget

2014 YTD

Transit: Passengers per Bus Hour Operated


$102.10

$100.30

$97.50

$101.96

$100.40

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

2011 2012 2013 2014Year

Historical

2014 Budget

2014 YTD

Transit: Cost per Bus Hour Operated


$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35

Van Taxi Agency

2011

2012

2013

2014 Budget

Transit: Paratransit Cost per Trip (by Mode)


FLEET MGMT DIVISION

1

2

3

6

7

28

43

54

61

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

ME

DA

BHD

Fleet

Zoo

Facilities

Highway

Parks

Sheriff

207 Vehicles Exceeding Replacement Criteria for 2013

Fleet Management: Vehicles Exceeding Replacement Criteria

11

233

624

3449

54

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

MEDA

MCDOTBHDZoo

FleetFacilitiesHighway

SheriffParks

177 Vehicles Exceeding Replacement Criteria for 2014

Fleet Management: Vehicles Exceeding Replacement Criteria

3

4

8

19

22

26

75

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

HOC

Highway

Zoo

Airport

Sheriff

Facilities

Parks

157 Underutilized Vehicles

Fleet Management: Underutilized Vehicles: NOT SEASONALLY OR

SPECIALTY ADJUSTED

3

3

5

8

20

20

0 5 10 15 20 25

HOC

Highway

Facilities

Airport

Sheriff

Parks

59 Underutilized Vehicles

Fleet Management: Underutilized Vehicles: SEASONALLY AND SPECIALTY

ADJUSTED

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2011 = 120 2012 = 151 2013 = 116

Sheriff

Highway

Parks

Other

Fleet Management: Accidents per Year


HIGHWAY DIVISION

$7,275

$6,070 $6,540

$8,150 $8,243 $8,899 $8,392 $8,511

$8,289 $9,544

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

2011 2012 2013 2014 B 2015 B

CTH

STH

Highway Maintenance: Cost per Mile to Maintain County and State

Trunk Highways


3.06%

11.50%18.26%

50.50%

16.67%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Failed toVery Poor

Poor to Fair Fair to Good Good to VeryGood

Excellent

Transportation Services: Pavement Sufficiency Ratings for CTHs

7% 10%

83%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Repl/Rehab NeededNow

Repl/Rehab w/in Next10 Yrs

Excellent to Good

Transportation Services: Bridge Sufficiency Ratings

Milwaukee County Transit System

MCDOTStat Presented by Dan Boehm, Managing DirectorAugust 2014

Ridership Profile

40%

5%12%

19%

9%

9%

2% 1% 3%

How Fare is Paid

Pay cash

Monthly pass

Weekly pass

Full fare tickets

Half fare tickets

U-PASS

CVP

Freedom Pass

Other

36%

33%

18%

13%

Employment

Employed full-time

Not employed

Part-time

Student

39%

18%12%

13%

13%

5%

Primary Reason to Ride

Work

Recreational

Shopping

Medical

School

Others

August 2014Performance Measure: Farebox Recovery

Objective: To ensure an acceptable level of operating expenses are being covered by passenger revenue.

Significance: From a budgeting standpoint this is thepercentage of the total fixed route expenses(excluding County expenses and cross charges) that is offset by passenger fares.

Performance Target: Meet or exceed 31.6%Based on the most recent NTD statistics in 2012, MCTS ranks 3rd among its peer systems. The 2ndranked system is Metro Transit in Minneapolis with a ratio of 31.6 percent.

Owner: Dan Boehm, Managing Director


August 2014Performance Measure: Farebox Recovery

Measurement Method: Dividing the system's total fare revenue (including onboard and presale) by its total fixed route expenses (excluding County expenses and cross charges).

Factors impacting result: Farebox recovery is largely impacted by two factors, passenger fares and ridership.

Progress: Currently farebox recovery is down from the 31.4% which was budgeted, however the trend over 12 months also shows that the recovery ratio generally climbs the most in the 4th quarter, which will put it back on course to meet the target.

Driving Improvement: Tracking unproductive routes and making service changes to produce more efficient service. Implementing a new fare collection system that will boost pre-sales and provide improved information to increase Marketing efforts where needed.

Farebox Recovery by Month

Farebox Recovery

Target 3.4% increase to 31.6%

Documents

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION€¦ · Hwy Maintenance and Transportation Engin The Department of Transportation is a diverse department charged with developing and maintaining Milwaukee