92
i INFLUENCE OF MARIJUANA SMOKING ON STUDENTS SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN SECONDARYSCHOOLS IN IKOM EDUCATION ZONE OF CROSS RIVER STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONS (EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY) FACULTY OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA, NSUKKA SUPERVISOR: PROF. T. AMA NWACHUKWU BY EKPALI DAVID EGBUNG PG/M.ED/07/42681 JANUARY 2009.

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONS FACULTY …...schools in ikom education zone of cross river state. a research project presented to the department of education foundation, faculty

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • i

    INFLUENCE OF MARIJUANA SMOKING ON STUDENTS SOCIAL

    BEHAVIOUR AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN

    SECONDARYSCHOOLS IN IKOM EDUCATION

    ZONE OF CROSS RIVER STATE

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONS

    (EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY)

    FACULTY OF EDUCATION

    UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA, NSUKKA

    SUPERVISOR: PROF. T. AMA NWACHUKWU

    BY

    EKPALI DAVID EGBUNG

    PG/M.ED/07/42681

    JANUARY 2009.

  • ii

    TITLE PAGE

    INFLUENCE OF MARIJUANA SMOKING ON STUDENTS SOCIAL

    BEHAVIOUR AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN SECONDARY

    SCHOOLS IN IKOM EDUCATION ZONE OF CROSS RIVER STATE.

    A RESEARCH PROJECT

    PRESENTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FOUNDATION,

    FACULTY OF EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA, NSUKKA, IN

    PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR AWARD OF

    DEGREE OF MASTERS IN EDUCATION PSYCHOLOGY

    BY

    EKPALI DAVID EGBUNG

    PG/MED/07/42681

    SUPERVISOR: PROF. T. AMA NWACHUKWU

    JANUARY 2009

  • iii

    APPROVAL PAGE

    This project has been approved by the Department of Educational

    Foundations, Faculty of Education, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nigeria.

    BY

    ………………………… ………………………….

    Prof. T. Ama Nwachukwu Dr. J. C. Omeje

    Supervisor Internal Examinar

    ………………………….. ……………………………

    Prof. G.C. Prof. N. Ogbonnaya

    External Examiner Head of Department

    ………………………………….

    Prof. G.C. Offorma

    Dean Faculty of Education

  • iv

    CERTIFICATION

    Ekpali David Egbung is a post-graduate student in the Department

    of Educational Foundation (Educational Psychology) with registration

    number PG/M.ED/07/42681. He has satisfactorily completed the

    requirement for the course and research work for the award of Master in

    Education (M.ED)

    The work embodied in this thesis is original and has not been

    submitted in part of in full for any other master degree or Diploma in this

    University or any other University.

    …………………………… ……………………………

    Prof. T. Ama Nwachukwu Ekpali David Egbung

    Supervisor student

    PG/M.ED/07/42681

  • v

    DEDICATION

    This work is dedicated to God Almighty and my beloved Father Mr. John

    Ekpali Egbung.

  • vi

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    Thus the biblical assertion. ―Unless the Lord building house, in vain

    do its builders toil. In vain is your earlier rising, and your going later to bed.

    Sweating to make a living while he provides for his beloved while they

    slumber‖. Blessed be the name of the lord God almighty for his wisdom,

    self control and strength given to me in this research work.

    Though the grace of God abounds, the following persons made

    themselves instrument of that pgrace. Professor T. Ama Nwachukwu my

    supervisor. Mr. John Ekpali Egbong my father Mrs Agnes INNE Ekpali my

    beloved mother, Mrs Cecilia Iroshu Ekpali my honey wife. May the good

    Lord reward them abundantly.

    I would not have attained the academic height where I am now, not

    to talks of contemplating the idea of this project if not for the wise counsels

    I constantly receive from these facilitators in the shaping of my unique

    history. These to a great extent, help me in my journey to success. The

    first is my Bishop, most Rev. Dr. John Ebebe Aya, the Bishop of Ogoja

    Diocese, Rev Fr. David Omego, My solicitor, Barrister Mathew Ojuwa, my

    spiritual directors most Rev. Fr. George Adage, Rev. Fr. Linus Ajor, Rev.

    Fr. (Dr) .T. Onoyima. Rev. Fr. Immanuel Ayaliwu, I thank Dr. Ignatius

    Ezuem, Provost federal College of Education Asaba Delta State.. Mr.

    Ahmed Sani Head of Department Curriculum Education Federal College

    of Education Potiskum Yobe State. Honorable Amaba Peter Mpong my

    beloved friend, Dr. Dun Ngwoke, Dr. E.C. Umeano Dr. Omeje and Dr. U.

    Eze my most beloved lecturers in the Department of Educational

    Psychology University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

    I thank in a special way Mr and Mrs Adagah Denis Ashia, Mr and

    Mrs Adie Cletus Enaji, their contributions turned this project from mere

  • vii

    possibility to actuality. I owe them a lot in gratitude for all they have been to

    me.

    I must acknowledge my brothers Engr. Peter Oshie Ekpali, Barrister

    Thomas Abua Ekpali, Mr Clement .A. Ekpali Mr. Ashia Peter Ekpali, Mr.

    Gabriel Asu Ekpali, May God countenance never depart from you and your

    family. I also appreciate my other, sibilings, Mr. Thomas Adung Olim,

    Adah Obiri, Olian Frank, Akah Denis, Obu Abua. My friends, Yakubu, Izu,

    Nnamani, Ugochukwu, U.K Computers, Ekara Friday, Placid Ize, Uket

    Oduma Obu, Odey Ashanda and Eneji Ashia deserves countless thanks

    for their prayers and encouragement throughout my year in school.

    I shall not forget to acknowledge my God giving children who‘s word

    are ―Daddy go and come back, God bless you as you are going; when you

    come back buy us bread and motor!. There are praise God Thomas

    Ekpali, God‘swill Augustine Ekpali and wisdom John Ekpali, may the will of

    God be done in your life Amen.

  • viii

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Title page ............................................................................................................... i

    Approval page ....................................................................................................... ii

    Certification ......................................................................................................... iii

    Dedication ............................................................................................................ iv

    Acknowledgment................................................................................................... v

    Table of Contents ................................................................................................. vi

    Abstract ...................................................................................................... vii

    CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 1

    Background of the Study ....................................................................................... 1

    Statement of the Problem ..................................................................................... 5

    Purpose of the Study ............................................................................................ 6

    Significance of the Study ...................................................................................... 6

    Scope of the Study ................................................................................................ 7

    Research Question ............................................................................................... 8

    Hypotheses ........................................................................................................... 8

    CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF LITERATURE ..................................................... 9

    Conceptual Framework

    Concept of Marijuana .......................................................................................... 10

    Concept of Marijuana Smoking ........................................................................... 11

    Concept of Social Behaviour ............................................................................... 18

    Concept of Academic Achievement .................................................................... 21

    Relationship between marijuana smoking and social behaviour ......................... 21

    Factors Affecting Social Behaviour in School/Society ......................................... 25

  • ix

    Relationship Between Marijuana Smoking and Academic Achievement. ........... 28

    Theoretical Framework

    Erik Erikson Theory of psychosocial development ............................................. 32

    B.F Skinner Operant Conditioning Theory ......................................................... 36

    Albert Bandura‘s social learning theory ............................................................... 40

    Review of Empirical Studies ............................................................................ 41

    Summary of Literature Review ........................................................................ 44

    CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHOD ....................................................... 46

    Design of the Study ............................................................................................. 46

    Area of the Study ................................................................................................ 46

    Population of the Study ....................................................................................... 47

    Sample and Sampling Techniques ..................................................................... 48

    Instrument for Data Collection ............................................................................ 49

    Validation of Instruments .................................................................................... 50

    Reliability of the Instrument ................................................................................. 50

    Method of Data Collection ................................................................................... 51

    Method of Data Analysis ..................................................................................... 51

    CHAPTER FOUR: PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA .................... 52

    CHAPTER FIVE:SUMMARY OF FINDINGS,

    DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 57

    Summary of Findings 57

    Discussion of Findings 58

    Implication 60

    Recommendation 61

  • x

    Limitation of Study 62

    Suggestion for Further Study 62

    Summary 63

    References ........................................................................................................ 64

    QUESTIONNAIRE .............................................................................................. 78

    APPENDIX 1 ...................................................................................................... 78

    APPENDIX II ...................................................................................................... 79

    APPENDIX III...................................................................................................... 80

  • xi

    ABSTRACT

    This study dealt with the influence of marijuana smoking on students, social behaviour and academic achievement. To carryout the research effectively, two (2) research question and two(2) hypothesis were formulated. The population of the study consist of two hundred (200) senior students of cross River State.. The major instrument for collection of data was questionnaire. The data collected was analyzed using mean and standard deviation, pearson’ correlation. The major findings of the study are: (i) Marijuana smoking is greatly influence student’s beahviour and their been popular in class and groups which makes them loose their chances of a prudence person. (ii) The influence of marijuana smoking on students social behaviour is not significant, thus their isolation from group or classes is as a result of constant smoking of the hemp. (iii) The students that smoke marijuana were intrinsically influence by their follow students that smoke marijuana. The result of hypotheses one revealed that there is negative correlation between students smoking marijuana and their social behaviour. (v) The result of hypotheses two showed that the influence of marijuana smoking on student academic achievement is significant. Following these findings some recommendations and suggestions for further studies were finally made.

  • 1

    CHAPTER ONE

    INTRODUCTION

    Background of the Study

    Marijuana smoking in recent years has become considerably

    pleasurable to the addict. Marijuana is a greenish-gray mixture of dried,

    shredded leaves, stems, seeds, and flowers. Marijuana is

    a common name for a drug made from the dried leaves and flowering tops

    of the Indian hemp plant cannabis sativa. People smoke, chew, or eat

    marijuana for its hallucinogenic and intoxicating effects. Different classes

    of people use it, it could be wrapped and smoked, it could be soaked into

    local gin and sold by local gin sellers, which abound in many part of our

    society. It is known by a number of slang names, including pot, grass,

    reefer, weed, and Mary Jane. (Iversen, 2008). Iversen also noted that

    marijuana is a substance that has long been used as medicine and an

    intoxicant.

    Nowlis (1975) observed that marijuana is a substance which affects

    the structure and function of the organism negatively inducing the

    organism into states, such as confusion, acute panic reactions, anxiety

    attacks, fear, a sense of helplessness, and loss of self-control. It was

    reported in Tide magazine of July 6th (2008), that, marijuana is among the

  • 2

    cheapest class of hard drugs that many secondary school students could

    purchase and use. A rap of marijuana is sold for N20.00 while a pinch of

    cocaine or heroin goes for N50.00 and above. The implication of this is that

    large numbers of Nigerian youths have access to marijuana.

    Marijuana smoking is similar to cigarette smoking. Akube (1997)

    explained that marijuana is a produce that harm the body of a smoker.

    This is a situation where the person inhales the burning fumes produced

    by the hand-rolled cigarettes form or pipes. Some of the observable

    characteristics of smokers that distinguish them from non smokers are

    odour similar to the burnt leave, excessive laughter, unkempt hairs, red

    eyes, black lips, excessive appetite, yellowish stains on fingertips etc.

    Marijuana smoking is widely spread among adolescents, students and

    young adults. The percentage of middle school students, who are reported

    to have been using or smoking marijuana, increase throughout the early

    1990, 1991 and 1992. (National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2003).

    Marijuana smoking is a common phenomenon among students in senior

    secondary school in the area of study. Anumonye(1980) observed that

    secondary school students who smokes marijuana initiate themselves by

    smoking at the age of 11 years, and that a friend‘s home is the most often

    smoking place, and the observable behavior among this smokers are

    relaxation and a feeling of well being, euphoria, enhanced sensation of

    taste, touch, hearing and vision.

  • 3

    Abimbola Fashola, wife of the Lagos State Governor was reported in

    the Tide Tuesday July 6th (2008), urging the National Drug Law

    Enforcement Agency to identify and educate grower and smokers of Indian

    hemp on it harmful effect on the society. Tide (2008) reported that, the

    commander of National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) Mr.

    Eigege Adamu, in River State, in an address at ceremony of United Nation

    day on Drug said that marijuana is an illicit drug,that causes 80% of violent

    crime among secondary school students in our society. The extent of

    Indian hemp abuse among secondary school students has prompted the

    mass media to organize discussion by official of mass media on ills of

    marijuana smoking.

    Non-smokers in this study are therefore referred to as, students who

    do not indulge in the smoking of marijuana whether in secret or in public

    places, and are involved in positive academic activities that will impact

    positively in their lives. Non-smokers are also individuals or students who

    do not possess the observable characteristics of those who indulge in the

    smoking acts. These are normal students that keep the rules and

    regulations of the school and obey constituted authorities.

    Social behaviour is the way people influence, perceive, and interact

    with one another and how people behave in social situations. The study of

    social influence includes the following; conformity, obedience to authority,

    the formation of attitudes, and the principles of persuasion. Researchers

    are interested in physical attraction, love and intimacy, aggression,

  • 4

    altruism, and group processes. Many social psychologists are also

    interested in cultural influences on interpersonal behavior. Schaller (2003)

    observed that social behaviour is to defend ourselves and those we value.

    Schaller agree that people get hostile when their reputations, their

    resources families members of the same gang, classmate are threatened.

    The motivation to defend ourselves can have obvious benefits promoting

    survival and that of our family members, but it can also lead to our

    escalating violence due to substance taking (marijuana).

    Social behaviour is goal-oriented, people enter social situation with

    short term immediate goal and this are linked to broader long term goals

    and ultimately to more fundamental motives (Bugental 2000). Social

    behaviour represents a continual interaction between features inside the

    person and events in the situation. There are anti-social behaviour and

    pro-social behaviour; anti-social behavior is a disorder in which individuals

    tend to display no regard for the moral and ethical rules of society or the

    rights of others. While pro-social behavior is an antidote in helping

    behavioural modification.

    Academic achievement is a situation where learning outcome is

    appraised in terms of matching it with standardized testing and its

    successful completion. It is all about what students can actually do when

    they have finished a course of achievement study. The need for

    achievement is a stable, learned characteristic in which satisfaction is

    obtained by striving for excellence (Feldman, 2002). During the course of

  • 5

    teaching and learning the teacher should employ instructional strategies

    that will reinforce behaviours‘ that is geared towards success at the end of

    the academic session.

    There are factors that influence students academic achievements

    such as innate abilities, character, traits, environmental, pedagogy, health

    and nutritional, motivation and school management. Though, these factors

    can be manipulated to achieve the desired objectives, as it can make or

    maim the successful completion of the child‘s education.

    Statement of the Problem

    Marijuana smoking by students has been largely associated with

    various factors and has been addressed from different dimensions by the

    researcher. Such influence suffices due to changes in the environment and

    school climate; it is also ranging from pleasure seeking, differing stress,

    joblessness, parental background and peer pressure.

    However, it has been observed that marijuana smoking has a very

    strong influence on students‘ social behaviour and academic achievement.

    Students‘ lifestyles remain an important determinant to their behaviour.

    Marijuana smoking could influence social behaviour and academic

    achievement of students in school, negative social behaviour like cultism;

    truancy, drug/alcohol, gangsterism, and examination malpractice have

    been on the increase recently. Furthermore,the environment, which one

    finds himself, influences him/her. However, literature review show that no

    study has been carried out on the influence of marijuana smoking, on

  • 6

    student‘s social behaviour and academic achievement among students in

    secondary school in Ikom Educational zone.

    The thrust of this work is therefore to find answers to the following

    questions ―how does marijuana smoking influence students social

    behaviour as compared to non smokers and their academic achievement

    in secondary schools in Ikom educational zone of Cross River State?‖

    Purpose of the Study

    The main purpose of this study is to find out the influence of

    marijuana smoking on students social behaviour and academic

    achievement in Ikom Educational zone of Cross River State. Specifically,

    the study will seek to find out:

    1) The influence of marijuana smoking on students‘ social behaviour,

    compared to non their smokers.

    2) The influence of marijuana smoking on students‘ academic

    achievement, compared to non their smokers.

    Significance of the Study

    It is hoped that the findings of this study will help to understand the

    behavioural patterns of students who smoke marijuana in Ikom educational

    zone.

  • 7

    It is hoped that teachers will help to identify these students and know

    how to do placement in the class and equally know where to position these

    students in class environment.

    The study will be useful for teachers who are directly involved with the

    students and are aware of the influence of marijuana smoking on students

    social behaviour and academic achievement in schools and in turn help

    them out.

    School administrators and policy makers who are directly involve in

    formulating policies will create conducive learning environment for the

    students and it will also help educational psychologist in the areas of

    researching and developing theories and techniques in dealing with

    maladjusted behaviours‘. Parents will benefit immensely as it will enable

    them identify such delinquent behaviours and promptly call for intervention

    from the appropriate authority. The students will also benefits as they will

    realize the influence of marijuana smoking on their social behaviour and

    academic achievemen.t

    Scope of the Study

    The study will be carried out in Ikom educational zone and will be

    limited to eight( 8) public secondary schools. Day students presently in

    their senior secondary school class will be used for this study. The content

    scope of this study will be delimited to the influence of marijuana smoking

    on students‘ social behaviour and academic achievement.

  • 8

    Research Question

    In order to meet the objectives of this study the following research

    questions have been formulated.

    1) To what extent does marijuana smoking influence students‘ social

    behavior, compared to their non smokers?

    2) To what extent does marijuana smoking influence students‘

    academic achievement, compared to their non smokers?

    Hypotheses

    The following null hypothesis will be formulated and tested at, 0.05 level of

    significance.

    1. Marijuana smoking does not have any significant influence on

    student social behavior, compared to their non smokers.

    2. Marijuana smoking does not have a significant influenced on student

    academic achievement, compared to their non smokers.

  • 9

    CHAPTER TWO

    REVIEW OF LITERATURE

    This chapter presents literature related to the present study. The

    review is organized and presented thus:

    A. Conceptual Framework

    - Concept of marijuana

    - Concept of marijuana smoking

    - Concept of social behaviour

    - Concept of academic achievement

    B. Theoretical Framework

    - Erik Erikson theory of psychosocial development

    - B.F. Skinner, operant conditioning theory

    - Albert Bandura‘s social learning theory

  • 10

    C. Review of Empirical studies

    D. Summary of Literature Review

    Concept of Marijuana

    Marijuana is a dry shredded leaves with stems, seed, and flowers. It

    is also known in our local parlance in Nigeria as ganja, weed, igbo, grass

    and Indian hemp.

    Tide (2008) Marijuana, common name for a drug made from the

    dried leaves and flowering tops of the Indian hemp plant Cannabis sativa.

    People smoke, chew, or eat marijuana for its hallucinogenic and

    intoxicating effects. It is known by a number of slang names, including

    ―pot,‖ ―grass‖, ―widow‖, ―weed,‖ and ―Mary Jane.‖ Smokers called

    marijuana, such as ganja, pot, weed, grass, herb, widow and hash.

    Marijuana has name derived from trade mark called cannabis (Markin,

    1987). It is also known as Bubble Gum, Northern lights, fruity Juice

    (Haney, 1999).

    The flowering tops of the Cannabis plant secrete a sticky resin that

    contains the active ingredient of marijuana, known as delta-9-

    tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). The plant has both male and female forms,

    and the sticky flowers of the female plant are the most potent. Cannabis is

    used to produce three drug products: marijuana (pot,weed grass, dope)

    consist of dry leaf and flowers of the plant. Hashish (hash) is made from

  • 11

    the dried resin at the top of the plant. It is often brown or black and chunky

    looking. Hash oil is made from hashish. A sticky oil, it can be brown, black,

    red or clear. It is often place in small bottles or caps.

    Known in India, Central Asia, and China as early as 3000 BC,

    marijuana has long been used as both a medicine and an intoxicant. It

    gained widespread use in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s,

    becoming the second most popular drug after alcohol. In subsequent

    decades its use continued to increase, particularly among American teens.

    According to a survey prepared in 1998 by the United States Drug

    Enforcement Agency, marijuana use among teenagers increased almost

    300 percent from 1992 to 1998. Bungental (2000) opined that, between

    1980–1997, that the amount of Tetrahydrocannabinol(THC) in marijuana

    available in the united state rose dramatically.

    Most countries consider marijuana an illegal substance, but

    individual countries vary on how they prosecute the use and possession of

    marijuana. Some countries only impose small fines, while others impose

    harsher punishment, including imprisonment.

    Concept of Marijuana Smoking

    According to Johnson (2004), marijuana smoking through out history

    is still the same till date. Marijuana smoking is widely spread among

    adolescents and young adults. The percentage of middle school students

    smoking marijuana increased throughout the early 1990s. Johnson (2004)

  • 12

    Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), a system for monitoring the health

    impact of drugs estimated that, in 2002, marijuana was a contributing

    factor in over 119,000 emergency department (ED) visit in the United

    States with about 15 percent of the patients between the age of 12 and 17,

    and almost two-thirds male. He also said that the national institute of

    Justices Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program, which collects

    data on the number of adult arrestees testing positive for various drugs,

    found that, on average, 41 percent adult male students arrestees and 27

    percent adult female students arrestees tested positive for marijuana. On

    the average, 57 percent of juvenile male and 32 percent of juvenile female

    arrestees tested positive for marijuana.

    According to Stitzer (1997), when some one smokes marijuana, the

    substance in it called tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) rapidly passes from

    lungs into the bloodstream, which carries the chemical to organs

    throughout the body, including the brain. In the brain, THC connects to

    specific sites called cannabinoid receptors on nerve cells and thereby

    influences the activity of those cells. Many Cannabinoid receptors are

    found in the parts of the brain that influence pleasure, memory, thought,

    concentration, sensory and time perception, and coordinated movement.

    Tashkin (1990); when marijuana is smoked by youth, its effects

    begins immediately after the substance enters the brain and lasts from 1-3

    hours. If marijuana is consumed in food or drink, the short-term effects

    begins more slowly, usually in ½ to 1 hour, and lasts longer, for as long as

  • 13

    4 hours. Smoking of marijuana is more severe and it deposits several

    times into the blood stream than does eating or drinking the drug. Within a

    few minutes after taking marijuana smoke, an adolescent‘s or user‘s heart

    begins to beat more rapidly; the bronchial passages relax and become

    enlarged, and blood vessels in the eyes expand, making the eyes look red.

    He also opined that the heart bit of marijuana smoker is normally 70 to 80

    beats per minute, but it reduces by 20 to 50 beats per minute, when

    smoking of marijuana is done. This effect can be greater if other drugs are

    taken with marijuana. Tashkin (1990) said that immediately THC enters

    the brain, it causes the smokers to feel euphoric or ―high‖ by acting in the

    cognition, areas of the brain that respond to stimuli such as food and drink.

    THC activates the reward system in the same way that nearly all smokers

    do, by stimulating brain cells to release the chemical dopamine. Young

    students, who are involved in marijuana smoking, with this toxidity or

    reaction, usually become withdrawn and isolated.

    Brook (1999) opined that marijuana smokers usually experience

    pleasant sensations, colours and sounds which seem more intense, and

    time them appears to pass very slowly. He also agreed that, the smoker‘s

    mouth feels dry and he or she may suddenly become very hungry and

    thirsty. His or her hands may tremble and grow cold. Brook (1999)

    mentioned that marijuana smokers experiences an extremely strong

    feeling of happiness and excitement that usually lasts only a short time

    (Euphoria), and then feel depressed; occasionally, marijuana smokers also

  • 14

    produce anxiety, fear, distrust and panic feelings. Heavy marijuana

    smoking impairs a person‘s ability to form memories, shift attention from

    one thing to another. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,

    (2000) observed that moderate dose of marijuana alone was shown to

    impair driving performance; however, the effects of even a low dose of

    marijuana combined with alcohol were markedly greater than for either

    drug alone (NHTSA 2000). According to NHTSA (2000) marijuana users

    who have taken high doses of drug may experience severe or acute toxic

    psychosis, which includes hallucinations, delusions, and depersonalization,

    that is a loss of self recognition and the sense of personal identity.

    National institute on Drug Abuse (2005) state that, marijuana use

    has been shown to increase user‘s difficulty in trying to quit smoking

    tobacco. That the relationships between marijuana use and continued

    smoking was particularly strong in those who smoked marijuana daily at

    the time of the initial interview. National Institute on Drug Abuse

    conducted a study of 450 individuals and found that people who smoke

    marijuana have more health problems and miss more days of work than

    non smokers do. Many of the extra sick days used by the marijuana

    smokers in the study were for respiratory illness. The institute also stated

    that frequent marijuana use can cause burning and stinking of the mouth

    and throat, often accompanied by a heavy cough. Also students who

    smoke marijuana regularly may have the same respiratory problem like

  • 15

    that of tobacco smokers. Cancer of the respiratory tract and lungs may

    also be promoted by marijuana smoking.

    Ford (2002) mentioned that, 173 cancer patients and 176 healthy

    individuals produced strong evidence that smoking marijuana increases

    the likelihood of developing cancer of the head or neck, and that the more

    marijuana smoked, the greater the increase. Ford (2002) observed that,

    marijuana has the potential to promote cancer of the lungs and other parts

    of the respiratory tract in the body. That marijuana smoke contains 50

    percent to 70 percent of carcinogenic hydrocarbons which affect the body

    of the smoker. It produces high levels of an enzyme that may accelerate

    the changes that ultimately produce malignant cells. This fact suggested

    that, smoking marijuana may increase the risk of cancer more than

    smoking tobacco because of its terrible consequences in the body of the

    smoker. It is also stated clearly by Anthony, (2002) that health effects

    caused by marijuana may occur because tetrahydrocannabinol(THC)

    impairs the immune systems ability to fight infectious diseases and cancer.

    It also impairs short-term memory, attention, judgment, cognitive functions;

    impairs coordination and balance, increase heart rate; Impairs memory

    and learning skills. Long-term (cumulative, potential, permanent effects

    and cronic abuse). Increases risk of chronic cough, bronchitis, and

    emphysema. Increases risks of cancer of the head, neck and lungs.

    www.marijuana.info.org,October (2002.)

    http://www.marijuana.info.org,october/

  • 16

    Lynskey, (2000) said that students who smoke marijuana get

    lower grades and are less likely to graduate from high school, compared

    with their non smoking peers. Also, he said that workers who smoke

    marijuana are more likely to fail than their co-workers to have problems on

    the job. A study among postal workers found that employees who tested

    positives for marijuana on a pre-employment urine drug test had 55

    percent more industrial accidents, 85 percent more injuries, and a 75

    percent increase in absenteeism compared with those who tested negative

    for marijuana use (National institute on Drug Abuse 2003). The NIDA

    research report series said that depression, anxiety and personality

    disturbance are all associated with marijuana smokers. The research

    clearly demonstrates that marijuana use has the potential to cause

    problem in daily life.

    Fried (2001) said that, some babies born to women who used

    marijuana during their pregnancies display altered responses to visual

    stimuli, increased tremulousness and a high-pitched cry, which may

    indicate problems with neurological development. With regard to what

    Fried (2001) said, during the preschool years, marijuana exposed children

    have been observed to performed tasks involving sustained attention and

    memory more poorly than non-exposed children do. That while in school,

    these children are more likely to exhibit deficits in problem solving skills,

    memory and the ability to remain attentive. All what fried is emphasizing is

    that, children born to these women who are involved into marijuana

  • 17

    smoking are liable to perform low both in physical and social behaviour as

    far as life development is concerned. Avoidance of marijuana and other

    drug smoking will automatically make children develop proper maturation

    stages and as such perform well both in skills and memory ability.

    Fried (2001) observed that students who are addictive to this

    substance (marijuana) that is, the smoke marijuana compulsively even

    though it often interferes with their family, school and recreational

    activities. According to the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and

    Health (NSDUH), an estimated of 21.6 million Americans aged 12 or older

    were classified with substance dependence or abuse (9.1 percent of the

    total population). Of the estimated 6.9 million Americans classified with

    dependence of illicit drugs. 4.2 million were dependent on or abused

    marijuana. In 2002, 15 percent of people entering drug abuse treatment

    programs reported that marijuana was their primary drug of abuse.

    Lynskey (2003) believes that marijuana smokers display

    aggression on psychological tests, peaking approximately 1 week after the

    last use of marijuana smoking. The issue is that early exposure to

    marijuana can increase the likelihood of a life-time of subsequent drug

    problem. Forest (1989) said that, the present medical consensus is that

    marijuana has therapeutic value. This consensus can however be

    challenged. One of the main purposes of the anti smoking lobby is to link

    smoking with as many illnesses and defects of character as humanly

  • 18

    possible. Thus marijuana smoking has by now been associated with

    everything from child abuse, sleeplessness and careless driving to ulcers.

    Obviously the tendency of smoking marijuana is to shorten life, and this

    alone serves as impediment that can be imagined. Elsohly (2000) also said

    that marijuana smoking is an act which falls into one but several

    categories. Before we can decide the status of marijuana smoking, we

    must first investigate into life living tendency.

    National survey on Drug Health (2004), observed that marijuana

    smoker can produce behaviour changes, which are contrary to popular

    belief which is addictive. That marijuana smoker are impair on short term

    memory, weaken on immune system the national survey on Drug use

    observe that, the increasing smoking of marijuana by young students in

    school may have a profoundly negative effect upon their developmental

    growth and maturation. National Survey on Drug Use Health (2004) state

    that ,the increasing smoking of marijuana by young students may have a

    profoundly negative effect upon their developmental growth and

    maturation.

    Concept of Social Behaviour

    This is the way in which people in group or a group behave, interacts

    and responds to a specific set of conditions. People interact with one

    another to achieve goal or satisfy inner motivation. People, who belonged

    to social groups, do so to survive and improved their well being of life.

  • 19

    Bugerntal, (2000) social behaviour shows the basic motives for

    human behaviour. The desire to establish ties with other people usually

    comes high on the list of interaction. He further mentioned that, people in

    groups can share food and can team up for safety, he concluded by saying

    that social behaviour helps human being to establish social ties.

    Skowrongski, (2000) stated that social behaviour is to understand

    ourselves and others. The importance of these interactions with other

    people around us is obvious as it helps to explain our relationships with

    others and we are able to manage our lives effectively. Hogg and Hardies,

    (1992) state that, social behaviour is a process by which the actions of an

    individual or group affect the behaviour of others in an organization or

    school environment. Harris (1995) also observed that there are two

    difference ways of expressing social behaviour, prosocial and anti-social

    behaviour. Pro-social behaviour is helping behaviours which include liking

    and loving. Ant-social behaviour this term generally refers to actions that

    deviate significantly from established social norms which include

    Aggression, fighting and lying.

    Social behaviour is important in everyday life, providing potential

    cues about how to get along with classmates, teachers, coworkers, lovers,

    neigbhours, and members of different groups whose customs might

    otherwise seem strange to us (Regan 2003).

    Schaller (2003) agrees that people get hostile when their

    reputations, their resources families, member of the same gang,

  • 20

    classmates are threatened. The motivation to defend ourselves can have

    obvious benefits, promoting our survival and that of our family members,

    but it can also lead to escalating violence due to substance taking

    (marijuana).

    Crano(1988) The reason that increases the likelihood of

    interpersonal attraction is that we assume that people with similar attitude

    will evaluate themselves positively. We assume that when we like some

    one else, that person likes us in return. Yela (2000) also observed that,

    people who are physically attractive are more popular than those who are

    physically unattractive, is apparent even student in secondary school,

    primary school and nursery school are rating popularity on the basis of

    attractiveness and continues into adulthood.

    Social behavior varies to some degree, based on the social

    environment in which the child lives. This kind of behavior commonly

    includes doing assignments, playing football, skipping school, answering

    questions in class, getting into fights, running away from home, persistently

    lying, using illegal drugs or alcohol, stealing, vandalizing property,

    engaging in aggressive or violent behavior towards other individuals, and

    violating school rules.

  • 21

    Concept of Academic Achievement

    An academic achievement is something you do or achieve at school,

    college or university - in class, in a laboratory, library or fieldwork. It does

    not include sport or music (Wiki, 2006). It is all about what students can

    actually do when they have finished a course of study. An academic

    achievement, such as graduating 1st in one's class, is sometimes a purely

    quantitative matter, while having the findings of lengthy, comprehensive

    research published by a recognized journal is also a notable academic

    achievement. Being named head/chairman of a particular department at a

    university is both a professional and an academic achievement.

    In life, if one cares to learn, one learns every day. Education usually

    takes place in the classroom and is organized. The classroom activities are

    designed with the ultimate aim of bringing changes to the learners either

    behaviourally, emotionally and socially. Momoh (1992) Inability to achieve

    what a learner supposed to achieve, has a function of so many factors or

    variables. Psychologists have been able to classify these factors into

    hereditary, personality, environmental, instructional, health and nutritional,

    reinforcement and school management factors. He also said that there are

    similar ways of categorizing these factors:

    a. The student factors such as attitudes, individual differences, physical

    health and readiness to learning.

  • 22

    b. Teacher, instructional curriculum factors such as teacher attitude to

    students, types of classrooms control, curriculum contents,

    instructional contents, and preparation.

    c. Home, cultural and parental factors and

    d. Institutional factors such as the type of school, population control,

    discipline and personal interaction.

    However, some of these factors may not have long term effect on

    the academic achievement of a student because they are vulnerable to

    changes and improvement when they become corrected. In addition,

    academic achievement is not automatic but a gradual building up of

    knowledge both in emotion and behaviour (Momoh, 1992).

    At the end of any academic exercises students are rewarded for

    there scholarly and intellectual efforts in forms of certificates, awards for

    excellence, plagues and trophies and even awarded scholarships for

    further studies. In the end, you're measured not by how much you

    undertake but by what you finally accomplish (Trump,1987).

    Non-smokers in our study is therefore referred to as, a student

    who do not indulge in the smoking of marijuana whether in secret or

    in public places, and are involved in positive academic activities that

    will impact positively in his life. Non-smokers are individuals or

    students who do not possess the observable characteristics of those

    who indulge in the smoking acts. These are normal students that

  • 23

    keep the rules and regulations of the school and obey constituted

    authorities.

    Relationship between marijuana smoking and social behaviour

    The period of adolescence appears to witness an array of problem in

    social behaviour due to special class of people of that range. Some of the

    experimentations are occasional and of brief duration but some may be

    enduring and can even persist into adulthood. This is because they usually

    find their feet in so many aspects of life. Among the common social

    behaviours exhibited by these categories of youth/adolescents are:

    drug/alcohol use, truancy, armed rubbery, cultism/gangsterism,

    examination malpractices social adjustment, religious conflicts

    delinquencies and eating disorder. Overt behaviour (external) and the

    covert(internal) behavior. Steinberg (1996) categorized these social

    behaviour problems into two: internalizing behaviour and externalizing

    behaviour. From the rear, Steinberg (1996) said that externalizing

    behaviour, refer to that behaviour which the person‘s problems are turned

    outward and acted out like in delinquency and gangsterism.

    Steinberg (1996) stated that internalizing social behaviours are

    those in which the person‘s problems are turned inward and manifested in

    emotional symptoms like anxiety and depression or even suicide as well as

    in psychosomatic disturbances like bulimia and anorexia. For instance, it

    can be seen that in any case of suicide, the person must have been

  • 24

    depressed or distressed just like a depressed adolescent is more likely to

    have anxiety and may indulge in eating disorder. In the same way, those

    social behaviour exhibited as a result of smoking marijuana will often often

    externalized behaviour such armed robbery or truancy in the school (Ezeh,

    2005). Some depressed students can also resort to marijuana smoking

    and become delinquents in behaviour.

    According to Ezeh (2000) observed that problems among students,

    in school and outside school system, are common in many societies,

    especially in Nigeria. For instance, most bars or beer parlours and

    restaurants are usually besieged by students and other youths, who claim

    to visit such places for relaxation over some bottles of beer and sticks of

    cigarette. Again, in any party organized by youths, there is usually free flow

    of booze accompanied with much marijuana smoking and cigarette. On

    this fact, such heavy marijuana smoking, majority of students in the party

    ground will cause havoc in the neighborhood like looting, raping, armed

    robbery, fighting, burning of houses, destroying many materials thing that

    does not belong to them.

    Ezeh (2005), discussed that many people have called out on

    government to checkmate this trend but the society appear to be sending

    mixed signals to the youngsters involved in marijuana smoking. He also

    noted that television and radio programmes are full of advert jingles on

    variety of beer and cigarette, to show image or describe people who have

    engaged in many rewarding activities after taking the substances. Yet

  • 25

    some adverts on cigarette end with a slogan, the Federal Ministry of Health

    warns that tobacco smoking is dangerous to health. What a contradiction!

    If the companies know the health hazards of these substances, why then

    are they advertised in such tantalizing manner that could easily induce

    young ones to try out? (Ezeh, 2005). Among drug users are the oblivion

    seekers, who want to move away from the realities of life and the

    experience seekers who want to move towards the realities of life. Ekeruo

    (1989) in Ezeh (2005) states that many youngsters indulge in marijuana

    smoking, as a way of fulfilling their sense of belonging to the peer or peer

    group. Asuni(1993) state that people who are judged to be mentally

    unstable tend to be more psychologically dependent on marijuana smoking

    than non smoker.

    Factors Affecting Social Behaviour in School/Society

    The menace of secret cult members in our society, especially in

    secondary school and institution of learning, is of tremendous gravity and a

    good number of the populace currently live with fear, the activities of such

    cults, include looting, maiming and outright killing of innocent citizens and

    those of the rival groups (Ezeh, 2005). According to Ekwunife (2000) cult

    simply refers to a system of religious worship or social gathering, mainly

    for devotion or homage to a being-human or spiritual. He said that member

    of secret cults often engage in hidden activities, whose overall ends and

    results spell doom for the members, the community and the society. Thus,

  • 26

    secret cults are characterized by secrete oath taking to maintain the

    secrecy, use of signs and symbols, rituals/initiation, parochial interest,

    exclusiveness as well as rationalization of their existence( Eya, 2001).

    Maliki (1999) discussed that cults as a social behaviour in Nigeria

    secondary schools is traced back to the middle of the last century with the

    emergence of the pirate confraternity, otherwise known as the National

    Association of Sea Dogs, which was initiated just to fight against mental

    enslavement of students by the colonial masters and they only engaged in

    cases of symbolic nature like rejecting some colonial table etiquette and

    dressing. Maliki (1999) states that, cult member has made Nigeria

    secondary schools into theatres occasioning wantom destruction of lives

    and properties even innocent by-standers. Some of these cult groups that

    ameliorate social behaviours in schools and campuses of Nigeria are: the

    Vikings (Baggas); Black Axe, Sea Dogs, Black Berets (BB); two-two;

    Buccaneers, Mafia, Burkina-Faso (BF), Amazons, the Black Bras and the

    Jezebel (Odoha 1999).

    Examination malpractice is another factor which is the commonest

    problem of social behaviour of students in secondary schools, some times

    called examination misconduct. It is an act or behaviour whereby most

    students in schools obtained score that were not actual or real. It is a

    pernicious evil that has eaten the fabrics of our educational system, such

  • 27

    that the authenticity of some certificate obtained from Nigeria secondary

    schools is subject of scrutiny and doubt in some developed countries.

    Eze (2000) stated that the reason why some of these students indulge in

    examination malpractice is that, they want to attain societal value

    orientation and quest for achievement without hard work. For this reason

    every student would want to acquire a certificate but many are not

    prepared for the studies.

    Nigerian students activist (1999) state that marijuana smoking

    among secondary school students has been a stigma of a morally

    bankrupt, decadent and wasted generation that must be made stronger or

    revitalize and collectively salvaged together in order to prevent the total

    degeneration and loss of our societal values and ideals. There are many

    factors that contribute to the influence of marijuana smoking among

    Nigerian secondary school students and youths, peer groups, parental

    background (broken home) emotional stress among others. The Nigerian

    students‘ activist (1999) mentioned that, students can be greatly influenced

    to be a marijuana addict if allowed to interact with his fellow students. He

    can be tempted on one fateful day to join the bad wagon of smoker of

    Indian hemp, thereby gradually ruining his career in life. Getting hooked to

    a particular drug like marijuana smoking is like a gradual process that will

    reach a climax.

    Nigerian student activist (1997) observed that, among Nigeria

    youths, problem of marijuana smoking have been a major threat to the

  • 28

    peaceful co-existence of all and sundry or everyone, not just few special

    people in our contemporary society, thereby destroying the socio-political

    dignity, personality and integrity of dependence on life. The Nigerian

    students‘ activist (1997) also lamented that, most parents in Nigeria today

    in their bid to make ends meet, searching for greener pasture always

    abandon and neglect the proper welfare of their wards and children and

    expose them to house maids. This ugly incidence will psychologically

    depress such children thereby giving rise to addiction. With this sad

    development, the society is being gradually and systematically ruined

    uncontrollably, thereby destroying the moral values of the Nigerian society.

    Some students instead of seeking for medical attention in times of stress

    would rather resort to marijuana smoking for correction.

    These are the evils that follow social behaviour in the society mostly

    in an academic environment where future leaders are being nurtured to

    take over governance tomorrow. This is what will entail how marijuana

    smoking will work, from the above analysis about cultism and

    (gangsterism, one cannot operate in a destructive mode like looting, killing

    without the sustenance of marijuana smoking.

    Relationship Between Marijuana Smoking and Academic

    Achievement.

    Heavy marijuana smokers made more mistakes and had more

    complexity supporting attention, changing attention to meet the demands

    of changes in the environment, and in registering, processing, and using

    information. So we can see that the greater harm among heavy smokers is

    probable because of an alteration of brain activity caused by marijuana.

  • 29

    Marijuana is an addictive drug that could adversely affect ones social

    behaviour contrary to things that could positively motivate the individual to

    strive for academic achievement.

    Dewey(1999) state that, marijuana smoking is a risk factor for

    academic problems such as lower grades, absenteeism and high dropout

    rates. Marijuana with alcohol and other substance can interfere with a

    student‘s ability to think, making learning and concentration more difficult

    and impeding academic performance. The more students‘ uses alcohol

    and marijuana, the lower his grade point average is likely to be and the

    more likely he is to drop out of school. Dewey (1999) also observed that

    students who smoke marijuana and alcohol may remember 10% less of

    what they have learned than those who do not smoke at all. It is a

    common observation that students who smoke marijuana tend to be more

    alienated from society and perform poorly in school and are also seen as

    unambitious and unmotivated to achievement as compared to non

    smokers. Compared to non-drinkers, heavy and binge drinking students

    are more likely to say that their school work is not encouraging rather poor

    and up to five times more likely to report skipping school. Dewey (1999)

    observed that students who smoke marijuana before the age 15 are three

    times more likely to have left school by age 16 and two times more likely to

    report frequent truancy. Others have shown increasing rates of

    delinquency following school dropout because of marijuana smoking

    before age 15.

  • 30

    Elliott (1978) said that evidence is clear that poor school

    performance, truancy and leaving school at a young age are connected to

    marijuana smoking by the students. That several problems are,

    responsible to students‘ behaviour while smoking marijuana, such as

    aggression and violence. He also maintained that most of them find it

    difficult in verbal and reading expression, lower reading and Mathematics

    scores to peer substance is as a result of marijuana and alcohol drinking.

    Elliott (1978) still observed that early aggressive behaviour may lead to

    difficulties in the classroom. Such difficulties may result in students

    receiving unfavourable evaluation from teachers or peers. These, in turn,

    might result to poor academic achievement and misconduct of behaviour.

    Kingery (1996) said that students who smoke marijuana observe to be

    aggressive in behaviour, that those who start smoking marijuana before

    age 13 use to perform poor in reading.

    Gottfredson (1987). Opined that, many schools include programmes

    designed to improve student‘s social behavior and guided counseling

    programs are often administered to students in groups as part of a study

    designed to measure and code interaction among students. Dishion(1999)

    stated that students who have poor academic planning may find

    themselves with so much problems to read few days to their examination.

    They may take marijuana to keep awake at night or to forget about the

    anxieties and fears of the examinations. He further stated that most

    students take marijuana for problem solving, for instance to speak boldly in

  • 31

    public during school debate, drama, discussions as well as overcoming

    public shyness, depression and lack of self confidence.

    Nigeria students activist (1997) state that habitual marijuana

    smoking has change from normal behaviour to mildly retarded character,

    both in humanly and socially unpleasant to themselves and find it difficult

    to cope in life direction. Most of these students who indulge on this

    smoking give rise to delirium and insanity, whereas habitual consumption

    usually produce mental weakness. The activist observed that, most of

    these students exhibit the sense of illusions and sometime violence,

    perhaps suffer from what is called insomnia. During their stay in the

    hospital they appear calm. The slightest provocation however evokes a

    state of violence and excitation. All these are related behaviour which can

    be observable from the students in secondary school that smoke

    marijuana.

    Theoretical Framework

    Erik Erikson Theory of psychosocial development

    B.F. Skinner operant conditioning theory

    Albert Bandura‘s social learning theory

  • 32

    Erik Erikson Theory of psychosocial development (1963)

    Erik Erikson (1902-1994), American psychoanalyst, who made major

    contributions to the field of psychology with his work on child development

    and on the identity crisis. Erikson became interested in the influence of

    culture and society on child development. He studied groups of Native

    American children to help formulate his theories. These studies enabled

    him to correlate personality growth with parental and societal values.

    Psychoanalyst Erik Erikson developed one of the most

    comprehensive theories of social development in 1963. According to

    Erikson, the developmental changes occurring throughout our lives can be

    viewed as a series of eight stages of psychosocial development, of which

    four occur during childhood. Psychosocial development involves changes

    in our interactions and understanding of us as member of the society.

    Erikson stages are represented in pairing of the most positive and most

    negative aspects of the crisis of the period.

    In the first stage of psychosocial development, the trust-versus-

    mistrust stage (birth to 1 years), infants develop feeling of thrust if their

    physical requirements and physiological needs for attachments are

    consistently met and their interactions with the world are generally positive.

    On the other hand, inconsistent care and unpleasant interactions with

    others can lead to the development of mistrust and leave the infant unable

    to meet the challenges required in the next stage of development.

    In the second stage, the autonomy-versus-shame-and-doubt stage

    (1 to 3years), toddlers develop independence and autonomy of

  • 33

    exploration and freedom are encouraged, or they experience shame, self-

    doubt, and unhappiness if they are overly restricted and protected.

    According to Erikson the key to the development of autonomy during this

    period is for the child‘s caregivers to provide the appropriate amount of

    control. If parents provide too much control, children will be unable to

    assert themselves and develop their own sense of control over their

    environment; if parent provide too little control, children themselves

    become overly demanding and controlling.

    The next crisis that children face is that the initiative-versus- the guilt

    stage (ages 3 to 6). In this stage, the major conflict is between children‘s

    desire to act independently and the guilt that comes from the unintended

    and unexpected consequences of their behaviour. Children in this period

    come to understand that they are persons in their own right, and they

    begin to make decisions about their behavior. If parents react positively to

    their child‘s attempt at independence, they help their child to resolve the

    initiative-versus-guilt crisis positively.

    The fourth and last stage of childhood is the industry-versus-

    inferiority stage (ages 6 to 12). During this period, successful psychosocial

    development is characterized by increasing competency in all areas,

    including social interactions and academic skills. In contrast, difficulties in

    this stage lead to feeling of failure and inadequacy. Erikson‘s theory

    suggests that psychosocial development continues throughout life.

    Erikson believes that each stage poses some crisis that needs to be

    properly resolved to ensure success in subsequent stage. Among the eight

    stages of psychosocial developments of individual‘s personality, the one

  • 34

    that concerns students in secondary school more is the fifth one which is

    identity versus identity Diffusion. Identity refers to an individual‘s unique

    development and the link between the unique values of the people he sees

    as his own (Manaster, 1977). This means that identity is concerned with

    one‘s own personal views and the identification with a group to which one

    feels to belong. Jessor(1977) opine that personality environment and

    behaviour are interrelated. When behaviour such as smoking is embedded

    in such a network concepts, the theoretical framework makes it possible to

    see the logical relation of smoking to other behaviour and variation in

    personality and environmental characteristic as well. Personality are

    values, exportation, beliefs, attitude, orientation toward self and others)

    which are cognitive and reflect social meaning and social experience.

    The individual as a social entity and in the process of making

    friendship begins to analyse people around him to ascertain those he is

    comfortable with and can trust. This is the stage that a student can be

    easily deceived by mischievous friends who will lure him with gifts in the

    guise of being nice, but will later introduce such students to antisocial

    behaviour. This scenario in our study explains Eriksons concept of trust-

    versus mistrust.

    The autonomy versus shame and doubt stage shows how students

    will strive for independence and would want to explore with their peer

    groups. They become very assertive and could spur arrogance in them if

    left unchecked. Attitude of social behaviour regarding marijuana smoking

  • 35

    on the part of friends are role models, example older adult or siblings,

    parents, salient members of reference groups) influence the probability of

    initiation. If marijuana smoking is practices by such significant persons,

    initiation is more likely, it is also more likely to occur at early age (Harbin,

    1975). He then opined that longitudinal evidence now available indicates

    that non using students who are most likely to smoke marijuana and hard

    drugs during secondary school tend to be more rebellious and deviance,

    The initiative versus guilt stage explains how students when left

    alone without guidance from their teacher and counselors are prone to acts

    that the students are not aware of the weight of the consequences. The

    period could bring guilt to them that may disorient them. Harbin (1975)

    longitudinal evidence now available indicate that student who are more

    likely to smoke marijuana during secondary school tend to be more

    rebellious and deviance, more alienated from parents; more critical of

    societal problem, more impulsive, more emotional, more pessimistic and

    sad, more sociable and extroverted; less traditional and conservative

    regarding values, less oriented toward religion, less orderly, diligent, and

    effective in work and academic habits, less intellectually curious and

    interested, less determined, persistence and motivated toward academic

    attainment, less likely to feel valued and accepted by others, less

    trustworthy and responsible, less tender and considerate of others, and

    less self controlled.

  • 36

    Manaster (1977) It can be seen that identity formation requires a

    number of skills which students ought to master their role experimentation

    versus role fixation. Adolescent tends to experiment on different ideologies

    and identities before settling at one. Many of them try out a number of

    roles to identify the ones that suit them best. Failure in the experimental

    process may lead one into role fixation that might manifest as one‘s

    involvement in antisocial behaviour like smoking of marijuana, violent

    activities. In the industry versus inferiority stage the student when properly

    guided will strive to be competent in whatever he does so as to avoid

    failure. The stage if not properly managed could build up inferiority

    complex in the student.

    B.F Skinner Operant Conditioning Theory (1948)

    American psychologist B. F. Skinner became one of the most

    famous psychologists in history for his pioneering research on operant

    conditioning. In fact, he coined the term operant conditioning. Skinner

    discovered important principles of operant conditioning, a type of learning

    that involves reinforcement and punishment. A strict behaviorist, Skinner

    believed that operant conditioning could explain even the most complex of

    human behaviors. , Skinner spent several decades studying the behavior

    of animals—usually rats or pigeons—in chambers that became known as

    Skinner boxes. Like Thorndike‘s puzzle box, the Skinner box was a barren

  • 37

    chamber in which an animal could earn food by making simple responses,

    such as pressing a lever or a circular response key. A device attached to

    the box recorded the animal‘s responses.

    The Skinner box differed from the puzzle box in three main ways;

    (1) upon making the desired response, the animal received food but did

    not escape from the chamber;

    (2) the box delivered only a small amount of food for each response, so

    that many reinforces could be delivered in a single test session; and

    (3) the operant response required very little effort, so an animal could

    make hundreds or thousands of responses per hour. Because of these

    changes, Skinner could collect much more data, and he could observe

    how changing the pattern of food delivery affected the speed and pattern of

    an animal‘s behavior.

    Skinner the founding father of operant conditioning developed what

    he called the Skinner box and his theory in 1948. His interest was in

    specifying how behaviour varied as a result of alteration in the

    environment. The term conditioning here means the process of regulating

    the behaviour of a learner through the manipulation of some event in the

    learner‘s environment. Environmental exposures to marijuana smoking

    provide a greater influence on many students to participate fully in a

  • 38

    condition they found themselves. Skinner stated that, what was satisfying

    during the initial period of tension reduction will be likely to repeat itself

    under similar circumstance on the occasion.

    In operant conditioning, reinforcement refers to any process that

    strengthens a particular behavior—that is, increases the chances that the

    behavior will occur again. There are two general categories of

    reinforcement, positive and negative. The experiments of Thorndike and

    Skinner illustrate positive reinforcement, a method of strengthening

    behavior by following it with a pleasant stimulus. Positive reinforcement is

    a powerful method for controlling the behavior of both animals and people.

    For people, positive reinforces include basic items such as food, drink, sex,

    and physical comfort. Other positive rein-forcers include material

    possessions, money, friendship, love, praise, attention, and success in

    one‘s career.

    Depending on the circumstances, positive reinforcement can

    strengthen either desirable or undesirable behaviors. Children may work

    hard at home or at school because of the praise they receive from parents

    and teachers for good performance. However, they may also disrupt a

    class, try dangerous stunts, or start smoking because these behaviors lead

    to attention and approval from their peers. One of the most common

    reinforces of human behavior is money. Most adults spend many hours

    each week working at their jobs because of the paychecks they receive in

  • 39

    return. For certain individuals, money can also reinforce undesirable

    behaviors, such as burglary, selling illegal drugs, and cheating on one‘s

    taxes.

    Negative reinforcement is a method of strengthening a behavior by

    following it with the removal or omission of an unpleasant stimulus. There

    are two types of negative reinforcement: escape and avoidance. In

    escape, performing a particular behavior leads to the removal of an

    unpleasant stimulus. For example, if a person with a headache tries a new

    pain reliever and the headache quickly disappears, this person will

    probably use the medication again the next time a headache occurs. In

    avoidance, people perform a behavior to avoid unpleasant consequences.

    For example,

    Keeln,(1996) stated that, reinforcement is the process by which a

    stimulus increases the probability that preceding behaviour will be

    repeated. This implies that, the ensuring tension reduction from marijuana

    smoking bring relief and reinforcement of the act which induced the

    administration of the marijuana in the first place. Delprato (1992) supported

    this Skinner‘s theory by stating that reinforcement is any stimulus which

    increases the probability that a preceding behaviour will occur again.

    Marijuana smoking is a reinforce to the smoker because it increases the

    probability that behaviour must respond to smoking which must take place.

    This theory affects the present study as it explains primary reinforce and

  • 40

    secondary reinforce by Skinner. That primary reinforce satisfies some

    biological need and work naturally regardless of a person‘s prior

    experience. Prior to the habit of marijuana smoking, the individuals could

    be faced with depression and therefore sought for a way of escape by

    indulging in antisocial behaviour such as marijuana smoking through the

    influence of his peer group and these actions will be of great experience.

    Reinforcement of marijuana responses intermittently can lead to greater

    conditioning and more resistance to extinction than reinforcement of ever

    responses.

    Albert Bandura’s social learning theory (1969)

    The third theory backing up this study is the social learning theory

    developed by Albert Bandura in 1969. According to psychologists Albert

    Bandura and colleagues, a major part of human learning consist of

    observational learning, that is, learning is done through observing the

    behaviour of another person called a model (Bandura, 1977).

    Bandura in his observation believed that, behaviours are acquired

    through observational learning. Example, children who where afraid of

    dogs were exposed to a model dubbed the fearless peer-playing with a

    dog. (Menlove 1967). This is applicable of the present study where social

    interaction and behaviour modeling exist between students in school

    watching how their fellow students smoke marijuana and other deviant

    behaviours.

  • 41

    Bandura (1986), state that, observational learning takes place in four

    steps. First paying attention and perceiving the most critical features of

    another person‘s behaviour, second remembering the behaviour, third,

    reproducing the action and firth being motivated to learn and carryout the

    behaviour instead of learning occurring through trail and error. Then the

    success being reinforced and failures punished, many important skills are

    learned through observation.

    This theory affects the present study because most students are

    motivated on a particular behaviour and they can as well carryout the

    expected behaviour exactly learned. These students learned how to smoke

    marijuana by observation from senior students in school, how to be

    aggressive, all these are behaviour modification in an environment. Many

    students behave well, but as soon as they left and joined their colleagues

    in school, behaviour will automatically change.

    Not all behaviour that we witness is learned or carried out, of course.

    One crucial factor that determines whether we later imitate a model is the

    consequences of the model‘s behaviour. Interestingly though observing the

    punishment of a model does not necessarily stop observers from learning

    the behaviour (Bandura, 1994).

    Review of Empirical Studies

    Daramola (2004) conducted a study on social behaviour and

    academic achievement of secondary school students in Ondo state of

  • 42

    Nigeria. The study was to investigate and find out whether there is any

    relationship between social behaviour and academic achievement of the

    student. To illicit data a Likert type questionnaire was used. Survey design

    was used and sample was 720 students randomly selected from 18

    secondary schools in using factor analysis to test the hypothesis. The

    findings of the study reveal that there is relationship between students‘

    social behaviour and their academic achievement.

    Crowely and David (1980) conducted a study on students‘ marijuana

    smoking in one East Lancanshire secondary school in the United state of

    America (USA). He was to examine the influence of marijuana smoking

    and academic achievement on secondary school students. The

    researchers employed survey research design with a sample of 11 and 25

    years old students. Classmates in this study were used. Data was

    analyzed using test retest reliability and cronbach‘s alpha. The finding of

    the study indicates that some of these students are addicted to marijuana

    smoking and they cannot stay without smoking marijuana.

    Samuel (1979) did a research on marijuana on social behaviour in

    public secondary schools of Lagos Nigeria. The study was to investigate

    the extent of marijuana smoking in social behaviour, and the school

    achievement. The study involved a sample of 14,584. Questionnaire was

    used to collect data. Analysis of variance and regression were used in

    analyzing data. The finding of the study revealed that there is a

    relationship between marijuana smoking, student‘s social behaviour and

  • 43

    their achievement in school performance. It also showed the extent of

    which marijuana smoking has a linkage between students inside school

    and those outside learning environment.

    Mensch (2001) carried out a study on impact of marijuana smoking

    on subsequent education attainment. The study investigated the

    relationship between academic achievement and marijuana smoking. The

    sample of young males from the National longitudinal survey of students

    was used for the study. The research design was survey and the

    instrument used was questionnaire. Data was analyzed using analysis of

    variance and regression. The findings of the study showed that, the

    likelihood functions for the probability of using marijuana smoking by

    students is within 18 years old, the study also revealed that family

    structure, (living with both parents, number of siblings), parental education,

    age, ethnicity, marital status, numbers of dependents, region, religiosity

    are indicator of living in a state where marijuana smoking has been

    decriminalized at age of 14.

    Winokur (1970) conducted a study on hospitalized students‘ addicts.

    The study sample was 259 randomly selected from hospitals. This finding

    indicated that mariSjuana smokers tend to run in families. He found that

    slightly over forty percent (40%) had marijuana students usually from

    home. Godwin (1990) find out that students of marijuana parents who had

    been adopted by non marijuana foster parents still had nearly twice the

    number of marijuana problem by their late twenties as did a control group

  • 44

    of adopted students who real parents did not have history of marijuana

    smoking

    Parlee (1979) carried out a survey study to identify the factors critical

    in friendships in a questionnaire answered by some 40.000 respondents,

    the qualities that were most valued in a friend were the ability to keep

    confidences, loyalty and warmth and affection, followed closely by

    supportiveness, frankness, and sense of human. The findings of the study

    revealed that, keeping confidences, loyalty and warmth and affection are

    among the most important qualities people look for in a friend.

    Summary of Literature Review

    Related literature shows that interaction with one another may

    achieve either positive or negative goal in life, which will be as a result of

    inner motivation. Marijuana has countless street terms, such as pot, herb,

    weed, grass, widow, and ganja. The review presented the conceptual

    framework on marijuana, marijuana smoking, social behaviour, academic

    achievement. It also takes into considerations the factors affecting social

    behavior in school and society, and the relationship between marijuana

    smoking and academic achievement.

    The review on theoretical framework traced the works of theorists

    and how their works have impacted on social behaviour. They are the

    Erikson‘s theory on psychosocial development, the Skinner‘s operant

    conditioning theory and the Bandura‘s social learning theory.

  • 45

    From the review of empirical studies on marijuana smoking,

    student‘s social behaviour and academic achievement in secondary

    schools, it is discovered that much research has not been done locally on

    marijuana smoking in secondary school. Rather much research work have

    been done on this same concept and especially in relation to social

    behavior and academic achievement by foreign scholars. The researcher

    therefore decided to draw the attention of relevant authorities to the

    menace caused by the influence of marijuana smoking on students social

    behavior and academic achievement.

  • 46

    CHAPTER THREE

    RESEARCH METHOD

    This chapter is made up of the following sub-headings, design of the

    study, area of the study, population of the study, sample and sampling

    technique, instrument for data collection, validation and reliability of the

    instrument, method of data collection and method of data analysis.

    Design of the Study

    The design of the study was Ex-post Factor. According to Ezeh

    (2005), Ex-post Fato research is a systematic empirical inquiry in which the

    scientist does not have direct control on independent variable because

    they are inherently not manipulable. The purpose of exposé factor studies,

    was to find out the factors that seem to be closely associated with certain

    behaviours occurrence, prevalence‘s or conditions.

    The researcher deemed it wise to adopt this design because, the

    researcher was not in full control of a major variable, marijuana smoking

    which predicted the study, but in finding out the cause effect relationship.

    The study seeks to elicit information on influence of marijuana smoking on

    students‘ social behaviour and their academic achievement.

    Area of the Study

    This study was conducted in the present Ikom Local Government

    Area of Cross River state. Cross River State is made up of eighteen (18)

  • 47

    Local Government Areas; and is divided into three (3) Educational Zone,

    the Ogoja Educational Zone, Ikom Educational zone and Calabar

    Educational Zone. Ikom which is in central senatorial district of Cross River

    State has four educational Area in the zone namely, Ikom Educational

    Area, Etung Educational Area, Obubra Educational area, and Boki

    Educational area. Ikom commanded my choice for this study because of

    the perceived marijuana smoking activities among secondary school

    students, deviant behavior, armed robbery, school drop-out and cultism.

    This area was also chosen for the study because farmers cultivate

    marijuana in commercial quantity as reported by the commander of

    Federal Road Safety Ikom branch on their ―drug and driving‖ awareness

    campaign on December 11th, 2007; sometime students are hired as

    laborers‘ to harvest and process the product, this gives students access to

    the product and the cultivation of the substance is done within the

    environment where these students live. Forest environment provides a

    protective coverage for students who smoke marijuana, as such; law

    enforcement agents do not have access to arrest students who smoke

    marijuana in the area.

    Population of the Study

    The population consisted of all senior secondary school students in

    Ikom educational zone of Cross River state. (Population of students by

    educational zone appendix III). There are total of twenty four (24) public

  • 48

    secondary schools in Ikom Educational authority. Eight public secondary

    schools located in urban center and rural area of Ikom education authority

    will be used. The reason why public secondary schools will be selected is

    because; most of them have no fence in order to monitor this students

    irregularity during school hours, teachers are not punctual to their classes

    and school supervisors are not regular for inspections.

    With all this, it is easier for students to practice this addiction within

    the forest in the school area. The choice of public secondary schools in the

    area has motivated the researcher to look on activities organized by the

    school authority for the students. On this note, most of these students

    relationship with peers and friends may in turn involve them in activities of

    marijuana smoking, gangs and clubs after schools, as such most of them

    may return late in the night to their parents.

    Sample and Sampling Techniques

    The sample size for the study was consist of two hundred (200)

    students. The researcher required two sampling processes. The first

    process is snorboh sampling technique and the second is simple random

    sampling (Eze, 2005).

    The random sampling technique was used to select 8 secondary

    schools that was randomly drawn from the 24 public secondary schools in

    Ikom education authority, 15 students were randomly sampled each from

    Senior Secondary class of eight (8) public secondary schools for the study.

  • 49

    In a snowball sampling, the researcher identified a student who smokes

    marijuana in the area. They identified student smoker help the researcher

    to administer the instrument to others who smoke and through this means,

    10 questionnaires where distributed each in the eight (8) public secondary

    schools in the area.

    Instrument for Data Collection

    The instrument for data collection is questionnaire, which was titled –

    Students Social Behaviour Rating Scale and student academic

    achievement questionnaire developed by the researcher. The academic

    achievement score of the students was obtained from their academic

    records. Their first year and second