Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    1/22

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    2/22

    decline and the proportion of adult population decrease led to the potential market

    will change. For example, the change of population structures of Yogyakarta and

    Central Java toward aging population as life of expectancy increase and decrease

    number of adult population because or fertility decline subsequently have to force the

    government implementing policy to close down or to merger many primary schools.

    Several years after, the secondary schools are also finding difficulty to get new

    pupils. This gives an illustration on how the change of population structure could

    determine the public policy. In contrary, the state has to spend a lot of fund to build

    new schools to serve young adult population need in the region where fertility rates

    still high. In some cases in order to make available its population need, the state

    have to provide more budget and grant. Moreover, more funds have to endow with

    subsidize to the region that has high poverty incidence or low quality of population.

    This perspective assumes that demographic aspect; especially population growth is

    place an independent variable.

    Other perspective assumes that demographic aspect could place as a

    dependent variable. This means that business activities could be influenced

    demographic variable. However, this could be occurring in a particular area or

    country. For instance in Batam before business activities (industries) are

    concentrated there, the number and the population growth was very low. Since

    business activities are located there, the rate of population growth increased

    significantly because abundant of migrants from other area migrated to Batam. In

    1990, the number of population was about 106.667 and in 1990 increase to 434.299

    and in 2005 increase close to 700.000. This means after industrial development, the

    population growth of Batam a year in period 1990-2005 vary between 5-10%. Rapid

    population growth is a result of in-migration as an attraction of the concentration of

    business activities (industries) there. However, the bulk of migrants have created

    new problems in Batam, such as crime, housing problem and environment

    degradation. This in-migration also led to population structure (age) of Batam aremore productive and young potential people. This means that business activities can

    be a magnet for people (labor) and lead to determine population aspect, especially

    population growth and age structures.

    From the previous discussion, it can be learned that demographic information

    could help some one to make decision about type, equality, and quantity for their

    business. Without those data and information the businessman may be find difficulty

    in developing their activities. However, business activities can determine population

    aspects as well. This gives ample reasons why businessman needs to study

    demographic aspects. Accordingly, this articles discusses several basic demographic

    2

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    3/22

    data and information such a number, distribution and population density, population

    structure (age, gender, education and employment) also their change and to evaluate

    its implications on business.

    NUMBERS, DISTRIBUTION AND POPULATION DENSITY

    From the number of Indonesians population in 2005 (213.4 million), lies in

    fourth place after RRC (1,264.5 million), India (1,002.1 million) and United State

    (275.6 million). This large number of population has potential to attract investor

    because there would be big market opportunities and an abundant amount of

    potential labor. Of course, this would help the development process and stimulated

    economic growth. Indonesia is one of destination countries for industrial expansion of

    industrial countries (Japan, South Korea, Hongkong, United States). Investment in

    several business activities has stimulated economic growth ranging between 5-8%

    per year. This economic growth has led to open opportunities for other business

    activities.

    However, this investment has created many problems cause of the unequal of

    quality and population distribution. Regions have large population such as Java may

    can attract more investors while other regions such as Papua, Maluku less attractive

    for them. Table 1 indicates the comparison of the population in Java and outside

    Java in the year 2005. Table 1 indicates about 60% of total population of Indonesia of

    live in Java, an island with its area covers only 7% of the total land area of the

    country. Especially, Jakarta population density in 2005 is about 13,334 persons per

    square kilometer (see Table 1). The high of population density indicates that Jakarta

    is a place has been more attractive for doing business both trade and service.

    However, it has been probably beyond the limit of carrying capacity of the

    environment to support the need of its population. This limitation has an implication,

    especially the cost in developing business, especially manufacturing, in Jakarta. It is

    more costly in Jakarta comparison to out side of Jakarta. The reason is that in

    developing business activities there is a need take into account the impact upon the

    environment. Environment has to protect and to minimize the impact of business on

    declining the quality environment of livelihood. This is important to consider in

    maintaining the sustainable development. To achieve this, an effort to prevent the

    degradation of environment we need to develop a plan and policy in controlling the

    impact of business activities on quality of environment.

    3

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    4/22

    Table 1

    Number and Population Density by Island and Provinces in 2005

    Island/provinces No.of population* % Pop.Density/sq km**

    SumatraNanggro Aceh Darussalam

    North Sumatera

    West Sumatera

    Riau

    Jambi

    South Sumatera

    Bengkulu

    Lampung

    Bangka Belitung

    Kepulauan RiauJava

    DKI Jakarta

    West java

    Central Java

    Yogyakarta

    East Java

    BantenB

    ali

    Nusa Tenggara

    West Nusa Tenggara

    East Nusa tenggara

    KalimantanWeast Kalimantan

    Central Kalimantan

    South Kalimantan

    East KalimantanSulawesi

    Nort Sulawesi

    Central Sulawesi

    South Sulawesi

    Southeast Sulawesi

    Gorontalo

    MalukuN

    orth Maluku

    Papua

    39,616,3664,213,821

    11,688,987

    4,555,810

    5,563,406

    2,627,216

    6,767,645

    1,546,286

    7,104,572

    1,042,828

    1,273,011

    128,025,689

    8,839,247

    38,886,975

    31,896,114

    3,337,095

    36,058,107

    9,008,1513

    ,378,092

    8,078,487

    4,169,695

    4,243,182

    12,068,1304,042,817

    1,913,026

    3,271,413

    2,840,87415,749,821

    2,121,017

    2,290,969

    8,457,123

    1,960,697

    920,015

    1,249,212

    881,867

    2,439,838

    18.62.0

    5.5

    2.1

    2.6

    1.2

    3.0

    0.7

    3.2

    0.4

    0.5

    60.0

    4.1

    18,2

    14.9

    1.6

    16.9

    4.21

    .6

    3.8

    1.9

    1.9

    5.61.9

    0.9

    1.5

    .1.37.4

    0.9

    1.0

    4,0

    0.9

    0.4

    0.60

    .4

    1.1

    9678

    169

    106

    52

    49

    73

    78

    201

    65

    15

    3,260

    13,344

    1,126

    982

    1,049

    757

    1,044

    610

    208

    90

    36

    28

    12

    75

    12

    82

    139

    36

    85

    51

    75

    31

    29

    7

    Total 213,375,287 100 110

    Source: *BPS, 2006, Population of Indonesia: Results of the Inter Census Population Survey 2005,

    Serie S1, Jakarta, p.51

    **BPS, 2007, Welfare Indicator 2006, Jakarta, p.112

    4

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    5/22

    Java, Bali and Sumatra (so called Western Indonesia) have numbers of

    population about 80.2% of Indonesia population. The rest about 19.8% of population

    are distributing in Kalimantan, Sulawesi, and other islands (so called Eastern

    Indonesia). Papua with its area cover 19.3% of the total inhabited only have 1.1% of

    Indonesian population. This unequal population distribution has an important

    implication on business development. The eastern of Indonesia is less attractive to

    investor has led to the business activities not developed in a good way in the region

    in comparison to Java and the rest of Western Indonesia. As a result, the

    development process is faster in Java and the rest of western than eastern Indonesia

    and this has an implication on inequality of welfare.

    Demographic data presents in Table 1 could be use for an investment

    planning as well. Java has a population density about 3,256 per square kilometers

    could be use as an indicator that labor and market are available there. However, it

    has limitation because land for industries has been limited so that land price is

    relatively expensive in comparison to other areas where population density is low.

    Another problem needs to be considering in areas having high population densities is

    for preventing environmental degradation and pollution. This need more fund so that

    the cost higher in comparison to the lower one. Labor cost may be lower but cost for

    environmental management in order to support sustainable environment may be

    more expensive. Those data can help the businessman to consider other alternatives

    in decision for their investment.

    POPULATION GROWTH

    Population growth can be use as basic information for business investment.

    They not only assisting in understanding the existing condition but it also can give us

    information about trend and prospect of population in the future. Table 2 presents the

    population growth rate by province of Indonesia in period 1980-1990, 1990-2000 and

    2000-2005. Data in Table 2 indicate that there is a significant provincial variation in

    the growth rate of population in period 1990-2005, ranging from 0.18% of West

    Kalimantan and 4.15% of Riau Island. Those data also presents that in several

    provinces the population growth in the past 10 years under 1%, such as in Jakarta,

    Central Java, Yogyakarta and East Java. West Java located surrounding Jakarta, its

    population growth about 2.7% above national growth rate. It seems that the district of

    Jabotabek as a greater of Jakarta Metropolitan has been received more migrants and

    peoples move out from Jakarta. This fact offered an indication that to develop

    business (retail and service) may be better to invest outside Jakarta than in center ofJakarta.

    5

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    6/22

    Table 2Population Growth by Provinces in period 1980-1990 and 1990-2000

    Provinces Pop. Growth

    1980-1990*

    Pop. Growth

    1990-2000*

    Pop. Growth

    2000-2005**

    Aceh

    North Sumatra

    West Sumatra

    Riau

    Jambi

    South Sumatra

    Bengkulu

    Lampung

    Bangka Belitung

    Riau Island

    Jakarta

    West Java

    Central Java

    Yogyakarta

    East Java

    Banten

    Bali

    West Nusa Tenggara

    East Nusa Tenggara

    West Kalimantan

    Central Kalimantan

    South Kalimantan

    East Kalimantan

    North Sulawesi

    Central Sulawesi

    South Sulawesi

    Southeast Sulawesi

    MalukuMaluku Utara

    Irian Jaya Barat

    Papua

    2.72

    2.06

    1.62

    4.31

    3.38

    3.09

    4.38

    2.65

    -

    -

    2.41

    2.57

    1.18

    0.57

    1.08

    -

    1.18

    2.15

    1.79

    2.68

    3.88

    2.32

    4.42

    1.60

    2.87

    1.42

    3.66

    2.78-

    -

    3.41

    1.67

    1.17

    0.57

    3.79

    1.80

    2.15

    1.83

    1.05

    0.97

    -

    0.16

    2.17

    0.82

    0.68

    0.63

    3.21

    1.22

    1.31

    1.92

    1.53

    2.67

    1.40

    2.74

    1.35

    1.97

    1.14

    2.86

    0.651.60

    -

    2.60

    0.52

    1.35

    1.45

    3.22

    1.83

    1.78

    1.26

    1.12

    3.00

    4.15

    1.17

    1.75

    0.48

    1.39

    0.86

    2.20

    1.44

    0.86

    2.19

    0.18

    0.63

    1.92

    3.05

    1.25

    1.07

    0.96

    1.52

    1.421.64

    3,.50

    2.17

    Indonesia 1.97 1.45 1.30

    Source: *BPS, 2000,Population of Indonesia: The Result of census 2000, Jakarta, p.5

    **BPS, 2007, Welfare Indicator 2006, Jakarta, p.111

    6

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    7/22

    Province outside Java that had experiences in the decline of population growth is

    Aceh, South Sulawesi, West Nusa Tenggara, West Kalimantan and Central

    Kalimantan. There have been several aspects causing the decline of population

    growth. The decline of population growth in Java provinces are partly causing of

    fertility and influx of out-migration provinces the population growth in the past 10

    years under 1%, such as in Jakarta, Central Java, Yogyakarta and East Java. West

    Java located surrounding Jakarta, its population growth about 2.7% above national

    growth rate. It seems that the district of the region. Whereas in Aceh the decreases

    of population growth because natural disaster of Tsunami that killed thousand

    peoples. West and Central Kalimantan, the decrease of population since the large

    number of population moved to other areas cause of social disturbance (riot and

    social conflict) that occurred since 1998. Fertility and mortality decline in several

    provinces of Java indicates that there is social change toward small family in

    response to family planning in the last 10 or 20 years ago. This would be effect on

    the change of the age population structure, and as a consequent, the age structure

    will change toward aging population. This will be discussing in the next section.

    The decline of fertility rate in few provinces have caused by some factors namely:

    Social change, especially female education has increased and female has

    initiated to enter the labor market of public sector in order to get wages. This

    brings change in social (life) behavior of women, especially toward marriage.They tend to delay marriage since they have to finish education for the sake

    or their career development in work place. For the marriage women, planning

    spacing of pregnancy is becoming a norm and the preference to have

    children depend on the family economic condition. Two children have already

    been a norm in young family.

    The awareness in birth control has spread out and has already been

    accepted in the society.

    The first age marriage has increased significantly, especially for younggenerations followed with young eligible couples.

    Small family norm are starting to be accepted and children are seen to be an

    economic burden (not as fortune any more).

    Service towards the effort to controlling and delaying pregnancy has available

    and easy to find.

    The decline of mortality rate is cause from several factors namely:

    Prevention for infection and spread disease has improved significantly.

    People are already free from spread disease.

    7

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    8/22

    Primary health care had developed and spread out so that people have easy

    access to find the health service.

    Access to service for pregnancy, childbirth, and modern facilities for mother,

    baby and child are already easy to find.

    Incidence for poverty tended to decline due to family health nutrition had been

    improving and nutrition for child under five years has improved significantly as

    well.

    Life expectancy for all age has increased.

    Table 3 present some indicator of crude birth and death rate, number of medical

    doctor per population, and life expectancy in 1971 and 2001. It shows that in all

    indicators confirm that within three decades there are significant changes in

    demographic aspects. Crude Birth Rates (CBR) and Crude Death Rates (CDR),

    infant mortality has decreased significantly. Families have accepted having two

    babies and may become a norm among young couples. The social changes toward

    small family norm have an implication on market opportunity of goods and service.

    To a certain degree in a normal condition, this changes lead to changes in family

    consumption behavior causing the ability to save pert of family incomes. The

    increase in purchasing power that could stimulate a market expansion for both goods

    and services.

    Table 3Crude Birth and Death Rates Medical Doctor per population and

    Expectancy of life in 1971 and 2005

    Indicators 1970* 2005**

    CBR (1/1000)

    CDR (1/1000)

    TFR

    Medical doctor per population

    Infant mortality (per 1000

    Life Expectancy of female when

    having a baby (year)

    Female

    Male

    40

    18

    5.5

    26,820

    104

    49

    46

    23

    9

    2.4

    5,150

    32

    57

    55Source: *World Development Report, 1991, Investing in Health, Washington, p.59

    **BPS, 2002, Welfare Indicators, Jakarta, 58

    8

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    9/22

    Data in Table 2 also indicates that several provinces where the population

    growth have increased above national rate. The provinces are Riau, Riau Island,

    West Java, East Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan, and Papua. This fact can use as

    an indicator that some business activities have attracted people migrate as an effort

    looking for job to those provinces. For Central Kalimantan, Southeast Sulawesi, and

    Papua beside in migration there is might be in association with the high fertility as

    result of low quality of human resources cause of the high proportion of poverty (see

    Table 4). By analyzing the population growth, we have an idea that there is open

    opportunity in those provinces to do business, but the low level of living condition, low

    family income as indicated by high poverty rate, the market might is quite limited

    leading the prospect for business also limited.

    Table 4

    Life Expectancy, Infant Mortality Rate and Poverty Rate of selected Provinces in 2005Provinces Life Expectancy* Infant Mortality Rate* Poverty Rate**

    Jakarta

    Central Java

    Yogyakarta

    East Java

    West Java

    West Nusa Tenggara

    Maluku

    Papua

    East KalimantanRiau

    West Sumatera

    74.0

    71.0

    74.0

    70.0

    69.0

    64.4

    67.7

    68.4

    71.670.1

    69.2

    14

    25

    14

    29

    33

    51

    38

    35

    2328

    32

    3.18

    21.11

    19.14

    20.08

    12.10

    25.38

    32.13

    38.69

    11.5713.12

    10.46Source: *BPS, 2007,Welfare Indicators 2006, Jakarta, p.115

    **BPS, 2007, Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2007, Jakarta, p. 585

    In Riau and East Kalimantan population growth have increased caused by

    influx of in-migration (young peoples) looking for job there. These areas have

    experienced rapid development activities since there are many investors investing in

    industries and other business activities. For example in Batam, Riau Island, bulk of

    investment in 2000 the economic growth of Batam reached approximately 7.67% a

    year. Batam City in the period of 1990-2000 has population growth approximately

    15.63% and in 2000-2005 decreasing about 6-7%, but still 4 times of national

    population growth. The industries activities have attract more labor migrated to this

    region. Free zone policy has attracted investors to invest in varied of business

    activities there. This has created a lot of job opportunities and business activities both

    formal and informal to support the need of population. This has led to attract more

    productive of young people looking for job there. It is not surprisingly; therefore, the

    age structures of Batam tend to dominate by productive age groups. This of course

    9

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    10/22

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    11/22

    Table 5

    Population Structure by Age of Selected Provinces in 2005

    Age Structure Indonesia (%) Yogyakarta (%) Riau (%) Papua (%)

    0-14

    15-64

    >65

    29.0

    66.3

    4.7

    21.3

    69.5

    9.2

    32.8

    65.0

    2.2

    35.5

    63.7

    0.8

    %

    N

    100

    213,375,287

    100

    3,337,095

    100

    4,563,406

    100

    2,439,834

    Dependency Ratio

    58

    44

    53

    57Source: BPS, 2006, Population of Indonesia: Results of the Intercensal Population Survey 2005,

    Serie S1, Jakarta, p.51

    Riau and Papua have experience of high population growth partly caused by

    in-migration and fertility, which has a different effect on population structure in

    comparison to Yogyakarta. There is tendency that both provinces, the age structure

    tend to have high proportion of population in age 0-15. This has different implication

    in comparison to Yogyakarta. To support the need of these populations the state

    needs to spend a lot fund to build new social facilities, such as public service: school,

    hospital, and others. This would create business opportunity but the market may be

    very limited. Moreover, the economic status or poverty rate such as in Papua is still

    high whereby the purchasing power also low.

    Population structure by age also can be used to examine the dependency

    ratio (population age 0-14 plus >65 or unproductive divided by population age 15-49

    plus 15-49 or productive population). In Indonesia dependency ratio are 58 that mean

    100 productive populations carry on 58 unproductive populations. The decline of

    population growth seems to have an influence upon dependency ratio. Yogyakarta

    dependency ratio is lower in comparison to Riau and Papua. The high dependency

    ratio may be could hinder development process because part of the income has to be

    spent for unproductive population need leading to the low purchasing power of

    population. This information can help what kind of business chosen if would like to do

    business in the area like that.

    The population age structure is able to provide information about family

    structure (size). Since the proportion of age 15-64 is higher ranging from 65% to 68%

    in Papua and Riau province and national level, this indicate that number of young

    families is bigger. Young family needs many housing facilities, domestic goods, both

    secondary and tertiary goods than old families. In normal economic condition, this

    may able to create market for business activities.

    Based on the population growth and age structure data we could predict thechange in age structure for several years ahead. This could help to develop a

    11

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    12/22

    business planning several years ahead. If the data is available, we could make

    several assumptions on the decline of fertility rate, mortality rate and migration and

    then incorporating them into a model so that several alternatives of change of age

    structure could be developed. Based on those assumptions we could make several

    planning alternative for business development. Table 6 contains data result from

    population projection in several provinces for the year 2010 based on an assumption

    that population growth, fertility, mortality, and migration are similar to the year 2000-

    2003 fell from 44% to 10% for men and from 69% to 16% for female. In addition, in

    this period also experienced a rise in secondary enrolment from 10% to 40%. Despite

    a massive effort carried out by the state, in term of education level, Indonesia lagged

    far behind the neighboring countries such as the Philippines, Malaysia, and

    Singapore. More than two third of the population above 10 years old are only

    graduated from primary school. Graduated high education (tertiary education) are

    very low about 2% in 1990 and increased to about 4% in 2005, except Jakarta,

    Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, Kepulauan Riau (see Table 7). Low level of

    education to some extent has implication on the quality of human resources led to

    low of purchasing power since they involved in low wages of employment (informal

    sector). In Eastern Indonesia, the proportion of population had graduated from

    secondary and tertiary not much difference from rest of Indonesia. This may has

    influenced why investor not interested in to invest their capital in some provinces of

    Indonesia. Not only skill labors are difficult to find out but also the market could not

    develop cause of purchasing power is lower.

    Table 6 present the projection result, there is a tendency that Indonesia

    population would change toward old population. In Yogyakarta the proportion of

    ageing population was increasing while the population under 15 was decreasing.

    Riau in the year 2010 do not severe any significant changes, only the population

    aged 15-64 a bit increasing. Population structure in Papua for 2010 in not much

    different from the structure in the year 2000, for the next 10 years, according to theresult of population projection of Riau and Papua they would not need any significant

    change yet. In Yogyakarta there would be needed business planning which could

    fulfill the needs of the ageing population. Businesses that are serving baby needs

    and children or population under 15 years old have reduced.

    These aggregate shifts in age structure are very important because many

    needs for good and services are strongly concentrated in particular age groups. This

    will cause corresponding variations in the level and type demand for particular goods

    and service. It is difficult to find data refer to Indonesia that can use to show the

    relationship between expenditure and age structures. To illustrate those relationships

    12

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    13/22

    we use examples Australian household expenditure and American expenditure by

    various broad categories according to the age structures see Figure 1 and Figure 2.

    Figure 1 indicates that the expenditures of household for recreation tend to increased

    gradually up age groups 45-55 and then decrease gradually. This means that age

    groups below 33-35 are potentially for recreation market. The market for clothing,

    medical care, housing and food could be identification as well. This pattern similar to

    the united state as indicated in figure 2. By analyzing relationships between age

    structure and household expenditure, we able to identified demand (market) for

    various goods and service. It is important to note that age structures not only main

    factor shaping demand for a product, but it can be use to understand the potential

    market. This means that one of the areas where demographic analysis may be most

    helpful to businessman is that it can help in identification the location of potential

    market. In addition, it can help in understanding the behavior of the diverse

    consumer groups that make up markets for goods and services both for existing

    situation and for the future.

    FIGURE 1

    Australia: Average Weekly Household Expenditure on Selected Items by Age, 1988

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    24 and

    under

    25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ age

    housing food recreation clothing medical care

    Source: Hugo, Graeme, 1981, p. 8

    13

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    14/22

    FIGURE 2United States: Expenditure on Selected Items by Age, 1988

    0

    400

    800

    1200

    1600

    2000

    less than

    25

    25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+ age

    rent food away from home education health care

    Source: Hugo, Graeme, 1981, p. 9

    Education

    Structure and level education of population is important data and information

    can be use for helping in developing business activity. Data and information onpopulation education structure and level of a region could give a picture of skill

    formation of the labors that is needed for supporting business activities. The region

    has low level of education maybe less attractive for business activities which needs

    support of skilled labors. For business activities that do not really on unskilled labors

    the low level of education structure would not be a problem but the level of wage

    would still be in consideration. Usually educated skill labors require different wages

    from unskilled labors. Business activities that are trying and seeking to find out low

    wage levels tend to look for regions have low level of education.

    Education level of population in normal condition could also be used as an

    indicator for understanding economic status of population. Regions with relatively

    have high proportion of educated people tend to have high incomes. Hence, it could

    also be used as proxy purchasing power of population. The life style and the need of

    population are influencing by education level. Based on those reasons, the need for

    goods and service for educated and uneducated people are different. As an example,

    the computer business could develop well in Yogyakarta because the proportion of

    highly educated populations is higher but computer business would not develop in

    14

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    15/22

    regions where the proportion of educated population is low such in Papua or Central

    Kalimantan.

    In the period between 1973 and 1991, the state has spending large

    investment for school building program. The out come is impressive, primary

    enrolment gradually increase close to 100%. As a result, there was a steady

    declining in illiteracy, between 1961 and - 2003 fell from 44% to 10% for men and

    from 69% to 16% for female. In addition, in this period also experienced a rise in

    secondary enrolment from 10% to 40%. Despite a massive effort carried out by the

    state, in term of education level, Indonesia lagged far behind the neighboring

    countries such as the Philippines, Malaysia, and Singapore. More than two third of

    the population above 10 years old are only graduated from primary school.

    Graduated high education (tertiary education) are very low about 2% in 1990 and

    increased to about 4% in 2005, except Jakarta, Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan,

    Kepulauan Riau (see Table 7). Low level of education to some extent has implication

    on the quality of human resources led to low of purchasing power since they involved

    in low wages of employment (informal sector). In Eastern Indonesia, the proportion of

    population had graduated from secondary and tertiary not much difference from rest

    of Indonesia. This may has influenced why investor not interesting to invest their

    capital in some provinces of Indonesia. Not only skill labors are difficult to find out but

    also the market could not develop cause of lower purchasing power.

    Data from Table 7 shows that within 15 years, from 1990 to 2005, the change

    of education level of population not significant. The proportions of primary educated

    populations are decreasing followed by increasing of graduates of secondary school

    but the proportions of population that have graduated from tertiary education are still

    low. Only a few provinces such as Jakarta, Yogyakarta, Bali, and East Kalimantan

    show significant increase. This indicates that improvement of welfare have not shown

    any significant changes in several provinces. From the business point of view, those

    changes have not yet give meaning because the possibility of market expansion isstill difficult to develop. May be this is one of the obstacles in tracking investors to

    invest their capital in several provinces, especially in the eastern provinces of

    Indonesia.

    15

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    16/22

    Table 7

    Education Structures of Population by Province in 1990 and 2005

    1990*

    Education (%)

    2005**

    Education (%)

    Province

    Primary Secondary Tertiary Primary Secondary Tertiary

    Ache

    North Sumatra

    West Sumatra

    Riau

    Jamb

    South Sumatra

    Engulf

    LampingBangka Belitung

    Kepulauan Riau

    DKI Jakarta

    West Java

    Central Java

    Yogyakarta

    East Java

    Banten

    Bali

    West NusaTenggara

    East Nusa Tenggara

    West Kalimantan

    Central Kalimantan

    South Kalimantan

    East Kalimantan

    North Sulawesi

    Central Sulawesi

    South SulawesiSoutheast Sulawesi

    Gorontalo

    Maluku

    Maluku Utara

    Papua

    73.2

    69.8

    72.1

    75.8

    78.3

    79.1

    76.8

    81.7-

    -

    51.9

    80.9

    83.0

    67.7

    81.2

    -

    75.6

    84.5

    86.2

    83.7

    76.3

    78.2

    69.2

    71.2

    78.0

    76.777.8

    -

    74.9

    -

    79.6

    25.4

    28.7

    26.1

    22.8

    20.5

    19.8

    21.5

    17.5-

    -

    42.8

    17.8

    16.0

    29.4

    17.6

    -

    22.4

    14.5

    12.8

    15.3

    22.6

    20.6

    28.5

    26.9

    20.6

    21.520.8

    -

    23.7

    -

    19,0

    1.4

    1.5

    1.8

    1.4

    1.2

    1.1

    1.6

    0.8-

    -

    5.3

    1.3

    1.0

    2.9

    1.2

    -

    2.0

    1.0

    1.0

    1.0

    1.1

    1.2

    2.3

    1.9

    1.1

    1.81.4

    -

    1.4

    -

    1.4

    51.9

    55.7

    61.8

    60.3

    63.0

    64.2

    62.7

    68.569.7

    45.8

    39.1

    66.6

    71.2

    52.1

    67.3

    63.4

    60.5

    76.8

    78.9

    69,6

    63.2

    66.3

    53.3

    53.0

    67.7

    66.866.1

    74.2

    59.8

    61.9

    70.7

    45.2

    40.8

    33.5

    36.6

    33.3

    32.3

    33.6

    29.228.1

    48.5

    50.8

    29.6

    25.7

    39.2

    29.4

    33.0

    33.2

    21.1

    18.9

    28,1

    34.0

    29,9

    41.4

    42.5

    28.9

    28.829.8

    23.2

    36.5

    35.7

    26.6

    2.9

    3.5

    4.7

    3,1

    3.7

    3.5

    3.7

    2.32.2

    5.7

    10.1

    3.8

    3.1

    7.9

    3.3

    3.6

    6.3

    2.1

    2.2

    2.3

    2.8

    3.8

    4.4

    4.5

    3.4

    4.44.1

    2.6

    3.7

    2.4

    2.7Source: *BPS, 1992, Population of Indonesia: Result of Census 1990, Seri S2, p.141

    **BPS, 2006, Population of Indonesia: Results of the Inter census Population Survey 2005,

    Serises S1, Jakarta, p. 102

    16

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    17/22

    Employment

    Besides education as discussed in the previous section, labor force and

    employment data could also be use as an indicator to examine the social and

    economic transformation process of a region. Labor force participation rate could

    show populations participation in labor market. The higher labor participation rates

    means the working age populations who are in endeavor to be involved in economic

    activities are high. Population growth, the expansion of education, the willingness of

    female to enter labor market, and the type of employment in a region could determine

    labor force participation in the labor market. Regions which is still depend much on

    agricultural sector or informal sector as a source of their income, the labor force

    participation rate are significantly higher compared to regions where the economy

    rely on manufacturing sectors. Understanding these data and information,

    businessman could examine the changes that will happen and could develop a plan

    or model for predictions on labor force supply and market prospect for business

    development or expansion.

    In period 1990-2005, the labor force participation in all provinces has

    experienced a significant increase (see Table 8): from below 60% rise to a level

    above 60%. This reflects that the flow of working age population for entering labor

    market is increasing. Population growth that occurred 20 years ago has contributed

    to this increase. Babies born 20 years ago are starting to enter the labor market. Thisincrease of labor participation rate might also cause of the increase of female labor

    force entering the public sectors a long with the increase their education. However,

    not all of the working age populations acquire employment as their aspiration. Most

    of them are continuing looking for jobs owing to the competition to enter labor market

    more tight in recent years. As the results, open unemployment has been increasing

    more than twice in period 1990-2005. This is an indication that labor market not able

    to absorb labor force. This means that economic transformation could not happen led

    to hamper in improving the quality human resources. This is of course as impact ofeconomic crisis that take place since the mid of 1997.

    During economic crisis, access to job opportunities in informal sectors

    became even more difficult to be entering by labor force. The competition became

    even difficult because among middle class workers and skill labor during the

    economic crisis seek to find prosperity in informal sector. Many workers of the formal

    sector that has discharged or received trouble in putting an effort in formal sector

    also attempt to enter the informal sector. Economic crisis has effect the slowing down

    of economic activities, except agricultural sectors. In fact, several sectors such as

    17

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    18/22

    Table 8Labor Force Participation Rate and Open Unemployment by provinces 1990 and 2003

    1990* 2005**Province

    Labor ForceParticipation

    Rate (%)

    OpenUnemployment

    (%)

    Labor ForceParticipation

    Rate (%)

    OpenUnemployment

    (%)

    Ache

    North Sumatra

    West Sumatra

    Riau

    Jambi

    South Sumatra

    Bengkulu

    Lampung

    Bangka Belitung

    Kepulauan Riau

    DKI Jakarta

    West Java

    Central Java

    Yogyakarta

    East Java

    Banten

    Bali

    West Nusa Tenggara

    East Nusa Tenggara

    West Kalimantan

    Central Kalimantan

    South Kalimantan

    East Kalimantan

    North Sulawesi

    Central Sulawesi

    South Sulawesi

    Southeast Sulawesi

    GorontaloSulawes

    Maluku

    North Maluku

    Irian Jaya Barat

    Papua

    53,2

    53,9

    51,0

    53,2

    56,6

    54,9

    59,5

    56,8

    -

    -

    48,7

    49,7

    58,6

    63,4

    57,3

    -

    61,7

    59,2

    63,2

    61,2

    58,7

    57,8

    53,6

    51,3

    54,5

    44,1

    53,5

    --

    49,6

    -

    -

    60,9

    2,8

    3,2

    3,0

    2,8

    1,9

    2,9

    1,8

    1,9

    -

    -

    7,1

    4,1

    2,6

    2,5

    2,7

    -

    2,0

    2,2

    0,8

    1,9

    1,8

    3,3

    4,3

    4,3

    2,7

    4,8

    3,3

    --

    3,4

    -

    -

    3,1

    68.4

    71.9

    62.5

    62.8

    66.0

    71.2

    75.5

    68.9

    65.0

    64.2

    63,1

    62.9

    71.1

    71.9

    69.5

    63.0

    79.1

    70.1

    79.9

    73.5

    73.2

    71.7

    64.7

    62.3

    66.9

    63.3

    71.1

    62.861.0

    59.2

    69.8

    71.7

    78.3

    12.5

    11.0

    11.5

    13.9

    8.6

    8.6

    6.1

    6.9

    8.1

    12.4

    14.7

    14.7

    8.6

    5.1

    8.5

    14.2

    4.0

    8.9

    5.5

    8.6

    4.8

    6.2

    9.0

    14.4

    7.6

    13.6

    8.9

    9.86.4

    12.3

    8.9

    10.2

    7.1

    Source: *BPS, 1992, Populations of Indonesia: Result of Census 1990, Jakarta, Seri S2, p.267

    **BPS, 2007, Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia, Jakarta, p. 84

    18

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    19/22

    construction, manufacturing industries, finance and trade decreased to a negative

    level (Boediono, Ace Suryadi, and Rusman Heriawan, 1999). In that condition, many

    business activities are suffer from bankruptcy. This condition was very difficult for

    business activity actually, before the economic crisis if we had already made effort to

    pay close attention to statistic numbers we could have anticipated possibilities that

    could occur. But what

    We have to bare in mind that we could not expect that economy crisis would

    happen as we experienced, moreover unexpected political variable had came to

    influence. An important lesson we could gain from that experience is that inefficient of

    management, with no transparency and no accountability has destroyed all of the

    essential potency of economic activities. As a result, unemployment increase, social

    conflict and social disturbances occur everywhere, investors withdraw from Indonesia

    and business activity becomes sluggish with much less prospect.

    The slowing down of business activities associated with economic crisis has

    hampered labors transformation from agriculture towards industrial sector or from

    traditional toward modern sectors. Despite agriculture continued being a vital source

    of employment, the shift towards manufacturing has occurred since 1990 (see Table

    9). In 2005 except Jakarta, agriculture continued to employ the labor force. During

    economic crisis agriculture sector have to absorb many return workers of urban

    areas that have lost their job because of the firm bankruptcy. For survival strategy,

    most of urban workers have to return to their home villages. This have increasing

    number of disguised unemployment due to the possibility to find out a full time job is

    quite difficult in the villages. The proportion of disguised unemployment before crisis

    is about 35% and the largest proportion are in the villages (Johnson: 1997:35).

    During economic crisis, the proportion of disguised unemployment has reaching 40-

    50 millions or 50%. These employment problems became more complicated because

    during the crisis, thousand of migrant workers who are working in Malaysia and

    Singapore are return to the home village.Like in Jakarta and in several large cities, many middle class people,

    including celebrities, seek to enter informal sector during the crisis. Because of that,

    the proportion of workers entering informal sectors increase from 65% in 1997 (the

    beginning of crisis) and became 68% in 1998 (during the crisis) all of that, causes a

    decrease in their income and purchasing power rapidly. The number of population

    living under poverty has increased from 12 million in the beginning of 1997 to 80

    million in the middle of 1998. Poverty rate in the rural areas have reached 53% and in

    the cities 39% (ILO, 1998: 99). The poverty rate could still be debatable

    19

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    20/22

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    21/22

    because each formula have different outcome. Without the formula, in reality we

    could witness that incidence of poverty have grown rapidly because of riots and

    social conflict that are happening in several places. It not only forces populations to

    flee and life in tents or evacuation place but also force million of people to lose their

    homes and properties. This means, during the economy crisis followed with many

    social riot cause people that live in poverty line increase significantly. This surely

    does not give advantage for business atmosphere. There is a tendency the economic

    condition being better since 2003 but the instability of political has been hindering of

    the investor to come to Indonesia leading to business opportunities not developed as

    expected.

    CONCLUDING REMARKS

    Demographic data and information have significance for business activities

    because they can help businessman to develop, expand and also planning for their

    enterprises. It is important to bear in mind that the relationship between demographic

    variables and business is not linear relationships. Their relationships only could

    happen in a normal condition. In an economic crisis condition, the relationship is

    quite difficult to be examined. Without any carefulness, the conclusion that we take

    might could be misleading.

    21

  • 8/7/2019 Demographical Environmental (Tadjudin Noer Effendi)

    22/22