Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Delft University of Technology
CHAMP, GRACE, GOCE and Swarm density and wind characterization with improvedgas-surface interactions modelling (PPT)
March, Gunther; Doornbos, Eelco; Visser, Pieter
Publication date2018Document VersionFinal published versionCitation (APA)March, G., Doornbos, E., & Visser, P. (2018). CHAMP, GRACE, GOCE and Swarm density and windcharacterization with improved gas-surface interactions modelling (PPT). 42nd COSPAR Assembly 2018,PAsadena, United States.
Important noteTo cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable).Please check the document version above.
CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consentof the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Takedown policyPlease contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights.We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology.For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to a maximum of 10.
1
CHAMP, GRACE, GOCE and Swarm density and wind
characterization with improved gas-surface interactions modelling
G. March, E. Doornbos, P.N.A.M. Visser
[email protected] COSPAR Assembly 2018,
Pasadena, California, U.S.A.,
Monday, July 16, 2018.
2
Contents
• Introduction;
• Improved SPARTA model;
• Gas-Surface Interactions (GSI);
• Influence on Aerodynamics;
• Influence on Wind;
• Influence on Density;
• Summary and Outlook.
3
Introduction
4
Improved SPARTA model
Panel model
Pros Cons
Simple approach Low fidelity geometry
No ShadowingLow computational cost
No Multiple reflections
SPARTA (Stochastic PArallel Rarefied-gas Time-accurate Analyzer) model
Pros Cons
High fidelity geometry Complex approach
Shadowing Expensive computational
costMultiple reflections
ESA-EOPG-MOM-MO-15, Siemes (2018)
5
New densities turned out to be higher reaching a mean +11% for CHAMP,
+5% for GRACE, +9% for GOCE and +32% for Swarm.
Improved SPARTA model
6
Attitude manoeuvre
Comparison
(90° Yaw man.)
13/05/2014
X-Y-Z Accelerations
&
Density comparison with 3
atmospheric models
7
OUT IN
Attitude manoeuvre
Comparison
(90° Yaw man.)
13/05/2014
X-Y-Z Accelerations
&
Density comparison with 3
atmospheric models
8
Gas-Surface Interactions (GSI)
Specular reflection Diffuse reflection
𝐶𝐷 = (1 − 𝜎) 𝐶𝐷,𝑠𝑝𝑒 + 𝜎 𝐶𝐷,𝑑𝑖𝑓 α𝐸
α𝐸 =𝑇𝑖𝑛𝑐−𝑇𝑟𝑒
𝑇𝑖𝑛𝑐−𝑇𝑤
- Adsorption of gases on satellite surfaces;
- (Solar activity);
- (Altitude);
- …?!
9
Influence on Aerodynamics
10
Influence on Wind
11
Influence on Wind
12
Influence on Wind
13
Influence on Wind
14
Influence on Wind
15
Influence on Wind
16
Influence on Density: GOCE
17
Influence on Density: GOCE
18
Influence on Density: GOCE
19
Influence on Density: Swarm-A
20
Influence on Density: Swarm-A
21
Influence on Density: Swarm-A
22
Influence on Density (ratios)
HA: High solar Activity; LA: Low solar Activity;
23
Influence on Density (ratios)
24
Influence on Density (ratios)
25
Summary & Outlook
- Optimize coefficients for diffusive & specular reflections (𝛼𝐸, 𝜎);- Improve Solar Radiation Pressure (SRP) accelerations;
- TU Delft works on the improvement of Swarm & GOCE thermospheric products [ESA contract (Starting: Q1-2019)];
- We are interested in revisiting GRACE data and work with GRACE-FO.
26
Thank you for your attention!
G. March, E. Doornbos, P.N.A.M. Visser
42nd COSPAR Assembly 2018,
Pasadena, California, U.S.A.,
Monday, July 16, 2018.