23
Citi Treasury Roundtable Series Ron Chakravarti, Managing Director, Citi Bryan Richardson, Senior Director, The NeuGroup March 2012 Defining World-Class Cash Management: Part I

Defining World-Class Cash Management: Part I - …€¦ · The World Class Principles Project Citi, The NeuGroup Global Cash and Banking Group, and 26 member companies (led by a core

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Citi Treasury Roundtable Series

Ron Chakravarti, Managing Director, Citi

Bryan Richardson, Senior Director, The NeuGroup

March 2012

Defining World-Class Cash Management: Part I

Introductions

Ron Chakravarti (Speaker)

Managing Director, Head, Global Solutions Management, Liquidity & Investments

Citi Global Transaction Services

Email: [email protected]

Tel: +1.212.816.6909

Ron leads a global team responsible for the design and delivery of integrated global treasury solutions for

Citi’s corporate and financial institutional clients. He has been with Citi for five years. His prior

experience includes positions in treasury consultancy; transaction banking strategy/business

development and product management; and corporate banking while based in Asia, Europe, and the US.

Bryan Richardson, CTP (Speaker)

Senior Director, Peer Knowledge Exchange

The NeuGroup

Email: [email protected]

Tel: +501.217.9925

Bryan Richardson joined The NeuGroup in July 2007 as director of peer groups to support the growing

number of peer groups facilitated by the company. In this role, he works at expanding the universe of

groups and member companies in addition to overseeing the relationship aspects and planning and

research process for several existing groups. He also supports the research and planning process of

other peer groups and authors articles for The NeuGroup’s flagship newsletter, International Treasurer.

Prior to joining The NeuGroup, Mr. Richardson has experience in cash management, treasury and

treasury consulting at a variety of institutions.

Manage through the Euro Crisis

Respond to accelerating changes in

regulations and tax

Get engaged, and add value to the

Supply Chain

Drive for operational Treasury best

practice

Extend the credit risk management

discipline

Leverage (or make case for)

technology investment

Last month we reviewed key considerations for Treasury in 2012, which include greater alignment with the

businesses, gaining operational flexibility and achieving best in class risk management

Background

While each company’s Trading, Treasury, and Working Capital model will determine specific 2012 priorities for Treasury…

…a common theme is recognition of the need to align more closely with working capital stakeholders, while maintaining

visibility of evolving trading models and proactively addressing impacts.

1

2

3

4

5

Trading

Legal and Tax Structure Commissionaire

Limited Risk Distributor

Toll/Contract Manufacturer

TreasuryWorking Capital

Management

Treasury/Risk

Management

Processes RTC

In-house Bank

Legal entity

AP/AR Processes SSC

Netting Center

Payment Factory

―… on Behalf of …‖

Corporate

Objectives

Liquidity

Structure

and

Forecasting

Risk

Management

Process

Execution

6

1

The World Class Principles ProjectCiti, The NeuGroup Global Cash and Banking Group, and 26 member companies (led by a core team of 6)

conducted a year-long program to define world class principles for treasury cash management activities and

provide a set of benchmarks that companies can use to measure performance. The project was co-

facilitated by Citi’s Global Treasury Advisory team and used their Citi Treasury Diagnostics tools.

Part I

Defining World-Class Cash Management

Part II

Structural /

Organizational

Organizational

Structure

Treasury

Responsibilities

Talent

Management

Bank Relationship

Management

Accounting

Policies and

Procedures

Technology End

State

Bank Account

Management

Intercompany

Txns / IHB

Dividend

Repatriation

Reporting /

Dashboards

Dashboards

Cash Visibility /

Pooling

Payments

Cash PositioningProcesses

2

Who is The NeuGroup?

The NeuGroup is an independent research and publishing company dedicated to the exchange of

knowledge among treasury and finance professionals through two mediums.

Newsletter:

Launched in 1994, our flagship monthly newsletter, International Treasurer

(www.itreasurer.com) makes us a trusted advocate for global finance practitioners.

Peer Groups:

The peer group model began in 2001 with the launch of Tech20, a group of treasurer’s in

the technology industry, which served as the start of a network of Fortune 500 practitioner-

driven member forums committed to sharing knowledge and experiences with their peers.

– Current peer groups 14

– Current number of member companies 160

– Current number of members 280 +

3

What is the Global Cash and Banking Group (GCBG)?

A group of more than 25 senior treasury professionals who meet twice per year to share ideas, challenges

and solutions within an informal, yet structured environment.

3M*

Accenture*

Agrium*

Altera

Amgen*

Applied Materials*

Bechtel *

Cargill*

Celgene*

Chiquita Brands*

Cooper Industries*

Costco*

Dell*

Diebold

Dr Pepper Snapple*

eBay*

Eli Lilly*

Genentech

Google*

Hasbro*

Herbalife*

Itron*

Kimberly-Clark*

Merck*

MoneyGram*

Nike

Oracle*

Research In Motion*

* World Class Research participant World class project core team member

4

What is Citi’s Treasury DiagnosticsSM?Treasury Diagnostics is a global treasury benchmarking program created by Citi. Participants, which include

multinational corporations from around the world, are able to benchmark their treasury operations vs. the

Best In Class and identify potential opportunities for improvement.

Benchmark Six Pillars of Treasury Operations

Liquidity

Management

Working Capital

Management

Risk

Management

Subsidiary Funding

and Repatriation

Policy and

Governance

Systems and

Technology

Identify Where You Stand Relative to Peers—Learn What Counts as Best in Class

Benchmarks Benchmarks Relative Performance Detail

Winner, Celent

Model Bank Award

Silver Winner, Solution of the

Year, Treasury and Risk Alexander Hamilton AwardsWinner, Innovative Product

Performance Risk Management +/-Policy &

Governance

Liquidity

Working Capital

Sub Funding &

Repatriation

Risk Management

Systems &

Technology

4.33.6

3.6

2.4

2.4 4.9

2.6

1.0

1.7

My Score

Peer Group

Universe 3.0

2.9 4.33.6

3.6

2.4

2.4 4.9

2.6

1.0

1.7

My Score

Peer Group

Universe 3.0

2.9 4.33.6

3.6

2.4

2.4 4.9

2.6

1.0

1.7

My Score

Peer Group

Universe 3.0

2.9 4.33.6

3.6

2.4

2.4 4.9

2.6

1.0

1.7

My Score

Peer Group

Universe 3.0

2.9 4.33.6

3.6

2.4

2.4 4.9

2.6

1.0

1.7

My Score

Peer Group

Universe 3.0

2.9 4.33.6

3.6

2.4

2.4 4.9

2.6

1.0

1.7

My Score

Peer Group

Universe 3.0

2.9 4.33.6

3.6

2.4

2.4 4.9

2.6

1.0

1.7

My Score

Peer Group

Universe 3.0

2.9 4.33.6

3.6

2.4

2.4 4.9

2.6

1.0

1.7

My Score

Peer Group

Universe 3.0

2.9

Top 25% of responses

Core 50% (25-75%) of responses

Bottom 25% of responses

Average response

My Score Top 25% of responses

Core 50% (25-75%) of responses

Bottom 25% of responses

Average response

My Score

My Relative Performance

Process Area Against Peer Group Against Universe

Liquidity/funding risk Worse Worse

Interest rate risk Worse Worse

Foreign Exchange

(Transactional)Better Better

5

2. Project Highlights and Outcomes

Highlights

Utilized a survey process of over 150 questions

Over 20 companies actively participated of which 6 were on a core leader team

Two phases over the course of a year

Outcomes

Two parts:

– Foundational areas: e.g., organizational structure, policies and procedures,

technology and talent management

– Processes-centered areas, e.g., cash positioning, cash forecasting, liquidity

management, and bank account management

15 Treasury operations categories, 72 principles to define world class treasury operations

Principles vs. Practices – intended to apply to ―all of the above‖ companies

Project Highlights and Outcomes

6

Principles:

Standardize operations first then evaluate additional locations

Centralize and align cash management to the degree necessary depending on

organizational structure, geographical locations, and local on-the-ground needs

Minimize the number and location of treasury centers as much as possible without

compromising operational efficiency and timeliness. This minimizes both expense and

points of operational coordination while ensuring operational optimization

Seek to extend operations at existing SSCs to capture efficiencies and benefits such as

availability of a broader talent pool and better integration with operations. Independent

treasury centers may be warranted and necessary, in lieu of or following co-location at an

SSC

Organizational Structure - HighlightsSummary Statement - As companies expand globally the need to organize effective treasury operations to

support remote areas of the business increases. For many MNC’s, this means winning greater efficiency in

developed markets so that it can deploy additional resources in developing markets, where efficiencies are

more difficult to achieve.

7

Organizational Structure – What Project Participants Said

How many Treasury Centers do you have, where HQ counts as 1?

36%

23%

32%

5%

5%

1

2

3

4

5

9

Principles:

Cash management activities are defined as ―owned‖ or ―influenced‖ and periodically

rationalized to avoid being overburdened by non-treasury or non-strategic activities

Standardized operational cash management activities are conducted outside corporate

treasury, either at a treasury center, a shared service center, or by local in-country staff,

leaving corporate staff with more resources for managing strategic activities

All policy decisions are initiated, or at least approved by, corporate treasury

Treasury Responsibilities - HighlightsSummary Statement - Treasury touches and is impacted by many areas within a company and obviously

can’t control everything. It should, however, at least try to minimize negative impacts by building influence in

areas that it can’t control. This requires treasury to take a hard look at the tasks being performed and to

determine if they are owned by treasury and if they are not owned how much influence it should have.

10

Treasury Responsibilities – What Project Participants Said

Where is cash operations / liquidity management performed in your organization?

73%

64%

14%

23%

0%

Performed at Head Office

Performed in a Treasury Center

Performed in a Regional SSC

Performed Locally in Country

Treasury Doesn’t Manage This Function

12

Principles:

Treasury does not ―own‖ treasury accounting itself, but partners with the accounting team

to foster good relations and ensure full understanding of treasury transactions

Treasury actively supports the purchase and use of tools that provide maximum

automation and minimal errors to accounting activity

Accounting - HighlightsSummary Statement - The big issue around treasury accounting is ―who should own it‖, which can be a

surprisingly complicated matter to consider. Expertise around actual transactions clearly resides with

treasury, which typically loathes being involved with accounting, while expertise around accounting rules

generally resides with accountants.

13

Accounting – What Project Participants Said

How automated is your treasury accounting process?

33%

39%

23%

STP (Push a button and create a report with automated feeds

from all related areas

Semi-Automated (need manual input along with automated

reporting)

Manual (need to manually pull info from various sources and

inputs and generate

spreadsheet)

15

Principles:

Certifications, participation in media articles, speaker opportunities and other possibilities

for personal development are supported and encouraged

Treasury and non-treasury rotational opportunities, either formal or informal, are supported

and encouraged for personal development and career management

Non-monetary reward programs such as flexible work hours and telecommuting programs

are supported and encouraged to create and maintain employee retention and

engagement

Talent Management - HighlightsSummary Statement - Talent and technology are treasury’s two biggest assets, and because they are

generally in scarce supply they must be carefully managed. A world-class treasury operation focuses on

various methods for recruiting, developing, and rewarding treasury personnel as well as different types of

monetary and non-monetary incentive programs.

16

Talent Management – What Project Participants Said

Do You Have a Rotation Program for Treasury Employees?

55%

41%

5%

No Program

Yes, Informal Program

Yes, Formal Program

18

Principles:

A global single instance of a treasury management system (TMS) and ERP is established

or in process

Supplementing the single instance TMS, best of breed systems are incorporated into the

TMS to allow for the highest level of STP

Unique special-purpose software products are minimal, automated and standardized

across all users

STP and full automation exists for at least 75 percent of cash management activity

processes

A world class treasury has dedicated IT support

Technology End State - HighlightsSummary Statement - Treasury technology is to support efficiency with automation (STP) and decision

support. But treasury needs to pursue an end-state that their organization can support and maintain

effectively. This can be evidenced by continually driving to minimize the number of core platforms,

supplemented by "best of breed" special-purpose applications where necessary.

19

Technology End State – What Project Participants Said

How Long Do You Think it Will Take to Achieve Your End-state Vision?

18%

55%

18%

9%

Less than 1 Year

2-3 Years

4-5 Years

More than 5 Years

21

3. Conclusions

Take-AwaysThe principles are intended to provide a roadmap by which any company can measure status and progress.

By focusing on principles, the results should apply to most companies and market environments.

With multinationals facing significant shifts in patterns of growth, any treasury organization seeking to be world-class must

become efficient in how it manages routine cash processes, so that it can focus more attention on supporting the

businesses generating the cash.

Becoming world-class is not a one-time endeavor. All organizations should look to regularly benchmark cash management

activities to see where they stand relative to peers, define their end goal, and set forth the milestones and acceptable time

frames to reach them.

Gaining a fuller understanding of the principles, and their application in various circumstances is best done through candid

discussions with peers – those in the same industry, as well as those engaged in other types of businesses. Service

providers can help too, as they serve as clearing houses for the best practices they see with their customers.

Acknowledgements

We thank all members of the Global Cash and Banking Group for their collaboration on the project and for allowing us to

share highlights.

Special thanks to the Global Cash and Banking Group core team members from Bechtel, 3M, Dell, Kimberly Clark, Merck,

Cooper Industries, eBay, and Eli Lilly. Their hard work in driving the research process and subsequent analysis and in

infusing the interpretation with the perspectives of corporate treasury practitioners resulted in practical and meaningful

takeaways for other practitioners.

22

Resources

Coming Soon!

Defining World-Class Cash Management : Part II - Tactical & Process Principles (Thursday April 26, 11:00 – 12:00 ET)

Project Highlights – To be Sent to Registered Participants

World Class Cash Management Principles: Highlights from the Collaboration of The NeuGroup’s Global Cash and Banking

Group and Citi. March 2012

Resources

www.itreasurer.com

http://www.transactionservices.citigroup.com/transactionservices/home/tts/corp/liquidity/index.jsp

23

Citi believes that sustainability is good business practice. We work closely with our clients, peer financial institutions, NGOs and other partners to finance solutions to climate change, develop industry standards,

reduce our own environmental footprint, and engage with stakeholders to advance shared learning and solutions. Highlights of Citi’s unique role in promoting sustainability include: (a) releasing in 2007 a Climate

Change Position Statement, the first US financial institution to do so; (b) targeting $50 billion over 10 years to address global climate change: includes significant increases in investment and financing of renewable

energy, clean technology, and other carbon-emission reduction activities; (c) committing to an absolute reduction in GHG emissions of all Citi owned and leased properties around the world by 10% by 2011;

(d) purchasing more than 234,000 MWh of carbon neutral power for our operations over the last three years; (e) establishing in 2008 the Carbon Principles; a framework for banks and their U.S. power clients to

evaluate and address carbon risks in the financing of electric power projects; (f) producing equity research related to climate issues that helps to inform investors on risks and opportunities associated with the issue;

and (g) engaging with a broad range of stakeholders on the issue of climate change to help advance understanding and solutions.

Citi works with its clients in greenhouse gas intensive industries to evaluate emerging risks from climate change and, where appropriate, to mitigate those risks.

efficiency, renewable energy & mitigation

© 2012 Citibank, N.A. All rights reserved. Citi and Citi and Arc Design are trademarks and service marks of Citigroup Inc. or its affiliates and are used and registered throughout the world.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates do not provide tax or legal advice. Any discussion of tax matters in these materials (i) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be

used or relied upon, by you for the purpose of avoiding any tax penalties and (ii) may have been written in connection with the "promotion or marketing" of any transaction contemplated hereby

("Transaction"). Accordingly, you should seek advice based on your particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

Any terms set forth herein are intended for discussion purposes only and are subject to the final terms as set forth in separate definitive written agreements. This presentation is not a commitment to lend, syndicate a

financing, underwrite or purchase securities, or commit capital nor does it obligate us to enter into such a commitment, nor are we acting as a fiduciary to you. By accepting this presentation, subject to applicable law

or regulation, you agree to keep confidential the information contained herein and the existence of and proposed terms for any Transaction.

Prior to entering into any Transaction, you should determine, without reliance upon us or our affiliates, the economic risks and merits (and independently determine that you are able to assume these risks) as well as

the legal, tax and accounting characterizations and consequences of any such Transaction. In this regard, by accepting this presentation, you acknowledge that (a) we are not in the business of providing (and you

are not relying on us for) legal, tax or accounting advice, (b) there may be legal, tax or accounting risks associated with any Transaction, (c) you should receive (and rely on) separate and qualified legal, tax and

accounting advice and (d) you should apprise senior management in your organization as to such legal, tax and accounting advice (and any risks associated with any Transaction) and our disclaimer as to these

matters. By acceptance of these materials, you and we hereby agree that from the commencement of discussions with respect to any Transaction, and notwithstanding any other provision in this presentation, we

hereby confirm that no participant in any Transaction shall be limited from disclosing the U.S. tax treatment or U.S. tax structure of such Transaction.

We are required to obtain, verify and record certain information that identifies each entity that enters into a formal business relationship with us. We will ask for your complete name, street address, and taxpayer ID

number. We may also request corporate formation documents, or other forms of identification, to verify information provided.

Any prices or levels contained herein are preliminary and indicative only and do not represent bids or offers. These indications are provided solely for your information and consideration, are subject to change at any

time without notice and are not intended as a solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any instrument. The information contained in this presentation may include results of analyses from a quantitative

model which represent potential future events that may or may not be realized, and is not a complete analysis of every material fact representing any product. Any estimates included herein constitute our judgment

as of the date hereof and are subject to change without any notice. We and/or our affiliates may make a market in these instruments for our customers and for our own account. Accordingly, we may have a position

in any such instrument at any time.

Although this material may contain publicly available information about Citi corporate bond research, fixed income strategy or economic and market analysis, Citi policy (i) prohibits employees from offering, directly or

indirectly, a favorable or negative research opinion or offering to change an opinion as consideration or inducement for the receipt of business or for compensation; and (ii) prohibits analysts from being compensated

for specific recommendations or views contained in research reports. So as to reduce the potential for conflicts of interest, as well as to reduce any appearance of conflicts of interest, Citi has enacted policies and

procedures designed to limit communications between its investment banking and research personnel to specifically prescribed circumstances.