10
Using electronic field recordings to increase the detectability of bird species at point count sights Deborah Cushman Timothy Johnson Robert Keys, PhD Department of Biology, Cornerstone University http://www.flickr.com/photos/mudhen/8591467174/

Deborah Cushman Timothy Johnson Robert Keys, PhD Department of Biology, Cornerstone University

  • Upload
    daryl

  • View
    34

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Using electronic field recordings to increase the detectability of bird species at point count sights. Deborah Cushman Timothy Johnson Robert Keys, PhD Department of Biology, Cornerstone University. http:// www.flickr.com /photos/ mudhen /8591467174 /. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Deborah Cushman Timothy Johnson Robert Keys, PhD Department of Biology, Cornerstone University

Using electronic field recordings to increase the detectability of bird species

at point count sights

Deborah CushmanTimothy JohnsonRobert Keys, PhDDepartment of Biology, Cornerstone University

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mudhen/8591467174/

Page 2: Deborah Cushman Timothy Johnson Robert Keys, PhD Department of Biology, Cornerstone University

Introduction• Monitoring of bird

populations is important in light of environmental changes

• Point counts are commonly used monitoring method

• Limitations of point counts include misidentification, training, and missed species

Page 3: Deborah Cushman Timothy Johnson Robert Keys, PhD Department of Biology, Cornerstone University

Objectives

• We hypothesize that electronic field recordings (EFR) will show that certain bird species are often less detectable in field point counts, but that training can increase the ability of observers in the detection of these missed species.

• We predict that observer detectability will increase significantly with each point count series when EFRs are used.

• EFR’s will enable observers to increase detection of bird species having lower detection probability

Page 4: Deborah Cushman Timothy Johnson Robert Keys, PhD Department of Biology, Cornerstone University

Methods• Pierce Cedar Creek Institute, Barry County,

Michigan– 32 Points count sites– 6 Replicates– Multiple habitats

• Equipment – Zoom H4n Field Recorder– 2 ME62 Sennheiser Omnidirectional Microphones

• Point counts – 5 minutes– Radius < 75 meters

• Analysis of EFR– Raven Pro 1.5

Page 5: Deborah Cushman Timothy Johnson Robert Keys, PhD Department of Biology, Cornerstone University

Results

• Partially completed analysis of four series• Significant increases in observer accuracy

1 2 3 40.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

Observer Detection Accuracy

Series

Perc

enta

ge co

rrec

t det

ectio

ns

P = 0.038P = .010

P = 0.165

Page 6: Deborah Cushman Timothy Johnson Robert Keys, PhD Department of Biology, Cornerstone University

Observers vs. EFR

1 2 3 40

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

ObserverRecorder

Series

Perc

enta

ge co

rrec

t det

ectio

ns

Page 7: Deborah Cushman Timothy Johnson Robert Keys, PhD Department of Biology, Cornerstone University

Conclusion

• Our current analysis shows that the use of electronic field recordings can increase the detectability rate of field recorders at point count sites.

Page 8: Deborah Cushman Timothy Johnson Robert Keys, PhD Department of Biology, Cornerstone University

Where do we go from here?

• Complete point count series 5 and 6• Analysis of detectability accuracy• Analysis of low detection bird species

Page 9: Deborah Cushman Timothy Johnson Robert Keys, PhD Department of Biology, Cornerstone University

Acknowledgements

• Willard and Jessie Pierce Foundation• Pierce Cedar Creek Staff• Cornerstone University• Dr. Robert Keys• Brooke Kiel• Emily Finch

Page 10: Deborah Cushman Timothy Johnson Robert Keys, PhD Department of Biology, Cornerstone University

Questions